1. Introducing two types of definitions of democratic regimes.

2. Outlining implications of choosing different definitions of democracy.

3. Clarifying some things that democracy is not.

DemocracyDemos = people-cracy = “rule”

“Regime” vs. “State,” “Government”“State”: territorially defined political entity, like “country.”

“Government”: collection of particular leaders fulfilling governing positions at any one time.

“Regime”: Set of rules & institutions defining political system.

Procedural DefinitionsSubstantive, “Outcome”-

focused Definitions

Minimal electoral definitions

More complex procedural definitions(“liberal democracy”)

Maximalist definitions

Procedural DefinitionsFocus on process and rules defining democracy.

Most common definitions today in study of democratization.

Minimalist Complex

Democracy = competitive elections

Additional institutions and/ or liberty protections required

Minimalist Electoral DefinitionsDefine democracy by process used to make up governing institutions.

Require only multi-candidate, competitive elections.

Minimalist Electoral DefinitionsJoseph Schumpeter’s (1943) definition: “individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote.”

Also Przeworski, Huntington

“The fallacy of electoralism” (Terry Karl)

The belief that elections equal democracy.

“Electoral democracies”

Regimes that have minimal competitive elections, but no other democratic institutions.

More Complex Procedural DefinitionsInstitutions or guarantees of freedoms, as well as elections, must exist to call regime democratic. E.g. Liberal definitions of democracy.

“Illiberal Democracies”(Fareed Zakaria)Everyone has the right to vote among multiple candidates, but human rights and individual liberties are not well observed.

Examples: Russia, other post-Soviet, Nigeria, Venezuela.

Complex Procedural Definitions Examples of Institutional RequirementsChecks & balances, separation of powers: legislative, executive, & judicial organs separated.

Rule of law: legal rules applied fairly and consistently to all citizens.

Guaranteed protection of minorities.

Complex Procedural Definitions Examples Robert Dahl’s definition of

“Polyarchy”: 1. opposition – contestation through

elections.2. participation – the equal right of

all adults to vote and run for office.

Includes certain civil liberties, argued to be essential.

Complex Procedural Definitions Examples

Schmitter & Karl: Dahl’s requirements plus a few more:

1. Elected leaders must not be subject to veto from unelected officials.

2. Elected officials must be able to make binding decisions without approval of foreign actors.

Complex Procedural Definitions Examples

Larry Diamond adds many institutions for protecting liberal democracy:

1. Constitution.2. Civil society.3. Independent media.4. Independent judiciary.

Procedural DefinitionsSubstantive, “Outcome”-

focused Definitions

Minimal electoral definitions

More complex procedural definitions(“liberal democracy”)

Maximalist definitions

Substantive Definitions of DemocracyDemand that democratic regime must succeed in providing outcomes that promote equality among citizens.

Substantive Definitions Examples

•Participatory democracy or deliberative democracy.

•e.g. Benjamin Barber: “strong democracy in the participatory mode.”

Substantive Definitions ExamplesEqual socio-economic outcomes.e.g. Ann Phillips (feminist): outcomes should allow all women to have equal chance with men at participating. •Social and economic inequalities prevent.

•Actual participation most important measure of democracy.

Procedural DefinitionsSubstantive, “Outcome”-

focused Definitions

Minimal electoral definitions

More complex procedural definitions(“liberal democracy”)

Maximalist definitions

Is democracy a continuous or dichotomous variable?Dichotomous = 2 values or categories

Continuous = a spectrum of infinite measures, not separated into distinct categories

What democracy is not – Not all good things go together(Schmitter & Karl)

1. Not necessarily capitalism or economic freedoms.

2. Not necessarily more orderly, stable, or consensual than nondemocracy.

Diamond on stability:Democracy depends on minimal coercion and maximum consent.

Results in three constant paradoxes re: stability:

Diamond: 3 paradoxes related to stability

1. Conflict vs. consensus. There must be disagreements and opposition in order to allow competition…Yet not too much disagreement!

Diamond: 3 paradoxes related to stability2. Representativeness vs.

governability. Governments must be responsive to constituencies, yet must be able to govern effectively.

Diamond: 3 paradoxes related to stability3. Consent vs. effectiveness.

• Democracy requires consent.• Consent based on legitimacy.• Legitimacy based on

effectiveness.• Effectiveness requires unpopular

decisions.