Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s Richard Leete Chief, Population and Development Branch...
-
Upload
pauline-cannon -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s Richard Leete Chief, Population and Development Branch...
Demand for Population-Based
Data in PRS(P)s
Richard LeeteChief, Population and Development Branch
Improving Statistics for MeasuringDevelopment OutcomesWashington, 4-5 June, 2003
MDGs as Platform for Policy and Programmatic Focus in
PRS(P)s
•MDGs squarely at forefront of global development agenda and unifying tool for the UN System
•MDG targets combined with ICPD RH goal a natural platform and entry point for UN engagement in PRS(P)s
– capture multidimensionality of poverty – support rights-based approach to development
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
Challenges in Operationalising MDGs in
PRS(P)s•Weak statistical systems
–Capacity constraints and–Ad hoc nature of data collection
•Localising targets and broading ownership–Translating global targets into national targets
•Disaggregating and ‘en-gendering’ indicators–Sex; urban/rural and poor/rich, etc–Gender important for each MDG
•Building partnerships for data collection–Broad participation of primary stakeholders and pooling resources
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
UNFPA Review of 27 PRSPs (i)
•Unrealistic target setting, incl. MMR targets including in all 27 PRSPs
– Slowly changing indicator
– Difficult to detect changes because of infrequency of event
– Lack of appreciation of resources needed (financial/non-financial) to meet targets
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
UNFPA Review of 27 PRSPs (ii)
• Use of indicators that are not readily measurable or interpreted including in relation to HIV/AIDS eg
–Condom use at last high risk sex based on data collected in DHS type surveys
• Lack of focus on poor in target setting
–Focus almost exclusively on national averages
–Limited use of poverty mapping: population based indicators combined with physical facilities
• Huge poor-rich differentials in population and social outcomes– differentials in access and quality of basic social services
• Resource gaps, financial and human, to supply basic social services
• Lack of political will – an artificial ‘north’ in South, akin to North: affluent urban
elites and institutional resistance towards pro-poor resource allocations
• Need pro-poor social sector budgets and to target interventions towards poor
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
Equality and Non-Discrimination
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Nicaragua
Yemen
Philippines
India
Bangladesh
Indonesia
Vietnam
Mozambique
Niger
Ghana
Kenya
Richest quintilePoorest quintile
Proportion Currently Married Women Using Modern Contraception
Contraceptive Prevalence Rates
richest and poorest quintiles, 11 Countries mid-1990s to 2000
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
Good Example of Use of Population Data in PRSPs -
AzerbaijanHousehold Poverty Incidence
(%)Absolute Poverty
Line
Poverty Incidence (%)Relative Poverty Line
Higher education
Secondary
Lower than secondary
42
51
54
12
18
20
Household with no children
Household with 1 child
Household with 2 children
Household with 3 children
Household with 4+ children
38
49
51
55
63
12
15
18
19
25
Head 18-29 years
Head 30-39 years
Head 40-49 years
Head 50-59 years
Head 60+ years
38
46
49
48
53
11
15
15
15
20
Head of household male
Head of household female
49
49
17
17
- 80
- 60
- 40
- 20
0
20
40
60
80
- 50 - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
More equal access
Less equal access
Improvement access for poorest
x axis: % change in access of poorest 20% to skilled attendantsy axis: % change in ratio of access between richest and poorest 20% to skilled attendants
Deterioration access for poorest
1 outlier
4 outliers
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
Have Health Outcomes Improved for the Poorest Quintile
and Become More Equitable over the 1990s?Skilled Birth Attendants, DHS in 21 countries
Morocco
Egypt
Improvement for poorest but less equal access
Dominican Rep.Guatemala
Indonesia
Colombia
Brazil NE
Bolivia
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Togo
Senegal
Cameroon
Burkina Faso
Improvement for poorest and more equal access
Kazakhstan
Bangladesh
Peru
Tanzania
Kenya
Deterioration for poorest and less equal access
Uganda
Mali
Deterioration for poorest but more equal access
In absolute terms,average access increased in 13 of 21 countries: in 14 poorest quintile gained .
Demand for Population-Based Data in PRS(P)s
A Way Forward
• Increasing common ground in aim to eradicate poverty and consensus around MDGs provide new partnership opportunities for jointly addressing statistical capacity challenges
– centralising and mainstreaming data collection within NSOs
– meeting demand for poverty data through pooling of national and donor resources and ensuring continuity of support