Delivering value for your money NOVEMBER 2013
description
Transcript of Delivering value for your money NOVEMBER 2013
Delivering value for your moneyNOVEMBER 2013
This presentation will cover…
How much we know about the state of safety and quality in the Australian healthcare system
How safe are our hospitals and health services
The purpose of the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards
Using medical practice variation to improve quality
Safety and Quality
Safety
Protect the patient from harm
Quality
Appropriateness
Effectiveness
People + Systems
The Australian Health Care System
The Australian health system is consistently one of the top performers in OECD countries7th longest life expectancy at birth life expectancy at birth 82 yrsTop 5 countries for survival after heart attack & cancerSpectacular” declines in death from CVD (Australia’s Health)8.9% GDP compared with OECD average 9.3%
Do the sick no harm
“It may seem a strange principle to enunciate as the very first requirement in a Hospital that it should do the sick no harm.”
Nightingale, F. First sentence of Preface to Notes on Hospitals (1859, 3rd. Ed.,1863)
Patient harm
• Around 12% adverse event rate
• Estimated that 50% of these events are avoidable
• Don’t know about the degree of harm
• One in 300 chance of being harmed – compared with one in one million as aircraft traveller
0.04% Death or serious harm
1,782
0.149% Temporary, less harm
6,816
• Medication error
• Patient falls
• HAI
• Deterioration and failure to respond
• Suicide
Leadership
How safe are our hospitals and health services?
How do we assess safety?
• Are patients/carers at the center of care?
• How many patient complaints are received? Week/month/year
• Are they resolved?
• How many SAC1 & SAC2 events?
• What is the HSMR?
• What is the infection rate?
• What is the hand washing rate?
• What is the surgical mortality?
• Results of latest climate survey?
• How are staff assessed?
• How are new technologies assessed?
Funders – Safety & Quality
• Are you getting only good news?
• Do you think that your providers are performing better than then they really are?
• Do reports contain the concerning news as well as the good news?
• What is world class performance and how do your providers compare?
• Are metrics kept simple and meaningful?
• Are these data shared with fund holders, patients and staff?
• Where does the patient/carer story fit with your Board and Executive?
National Safety & Quality Health Service Standards
• To protect the public from harm
• To improve the quality of health service provision
NSQHS Standards
Standard 7Blood and Blood
Products
Standard 10Preventing Falls and
Harm from Falls
Standard 1Governance for Safety and
Quality in Health Service Organisations
Standard 2Partnering withConsumers
Standard 4Medication Safety
Standard 3Healthcare AssociatedInfections
Standard 8Preventing and
Managing Pressure Injuries
Standard 9Recognising and
Responding to ClinicalDeterioration in Acute
Health Care
Standard 5Patient Identificationand ProcedureMatching
Standard 6ClinicalHandover
The NSQHS Standards
• Standards 1 and 2 are overarching
• Standards 3 – 10 are clinical standards, selected because they address areas where:
The impact of poor safety or quality of care is across a large patient population
There is a known gap between existing delivery of care and best practice
Improvement strategies exist that are evidence based and achievable
Update of outcomes end of November 2013
1320 public and private health services to be assessed over 3 years
• 297 health public (57%) and private health (43%) services have undergone accreditation
Nationally
• 51% have had accreditation status confirmed
• 49% have actions that need to be addressed within 120 days
What is Medical Practice Variation? (MPV)
• MPV across & within countries widely documented
• The fact that MPV are not always linked to clinical needs or patient preference now common knowledge
• Australian Atlas of Medical Practice Variation to identify anomalies
• To stimulate change to bring practice back toward evidence
• Decision support tools
Understanding Medical Practice Variation (MPV)
Effective Care: • Evidence based interventions for which the benefit
exceeds the harms so that most pts should receive the services (immunisations or beta-blockers following heart attack)
Preference-sensitive care:• Treatment options exist but carry different benefits
and risks (PSA screening vs. biopsy)
Lower-value care includes health care activities whose effectiveness has not been demonstrated
• Plain x-ray for lower back pain, IVF treatment over 40
Unwarranted variation in care
Underuse of effective care • e.g. screening of diabetics for retinal disease,
prophylaxis for VTE, chronic heart failure management
Overuse of supply sensitive care• e.g. overuse of acute care sector because of lack of
infrastructure support for chronic disease in the community
Misuse of preference sensitive care• e.g. Failure to accurately communicate risks & benefits
of alternative treatments & failure to base the choice of treatment on the patients values & preferences
Overuse
• More health care can lead to worse outcomes
• Almost all interventions have some risks of harm &/or side effects
• Intervention “creep” to different populations where benefit unproven or < harms
• Some services become widely used but are of little proven benefit
Overuse – lower back pain
• Routine imaging in low back pain < 6/52 duration
• Low back pain lifetime incidence of 80%
• In Australia 28% of patients with low back pain have X-Rays (US 42% of patients)
• Lumbar imaging for low back pain without indications of serious underlying conditions does not improve clinical outcomes
• Potential harms: unneeded follow up tests for incidental findings, irradiation exposure, increased risk of surgery & medical costs
Preference sensitive care
Early stage prostate cancer
• Watchful waiting: many prostate cancers never progress to affect quality of life or survival, but some do
• Radiation: shrinks or eliminates cancer in the
prostate, but there are risks of side effects
• Radical prostatectomy: removes prostate cancer entirely, but there are substantial risks of incontinence & impotence
The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care
www.dartmouthatlas.org
Estimated Cost of Waste in US Health Care
Failures of care delivery - $102-154 billion
Failures of care coordination - $25-45 billion
Overtreatment - $158-226 billion
Administrative complexity - $107-389 billion
Pricing failures - $84-178 billion
Fraud & abuse - $82-272 billion
Sum of midpoint estimates: $910 billion (34% of national health expenditures)
Berwick & Hackbarth JAMA 2012
Preference sensitive care
• Studies show major gaps in people’s understanding of their treatment options
• Importance of outcomes, side effects, risks differ for individuals
• Patient preferences may be poorly understood by doctors – e.g. breast cancer
• Decisions tend to be driven by doctors & favour intervention
• Better informed patients often choose different treatments
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2012. Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America.
Preference sensitive care
Decision aids (booklets, videos, web tools)
• prepare people to participate in decisions that
involve weighing potential benefits, risks & scientific uncertainties about interventions
• present sufficient information about options to help people clarify how they value benefits vs harms & what matters most
• allow informed judgments about options
Decision Aids
Cochrane systematic review
• People using evidence-based decision aids had
• improved knowledge of options
•more accurate expectations of possible benefits & harms
•choices more consistent with informed values
•greater participation in decision making
•reduced choice of major elective surgery in favour of conservative options
Stacey et al, 2011
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2012. Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America.
OECD Medical Practice Variations
2013 study – 14 countries
Key findings:
• Little variation in low-risk and high benefit procedures (surgery after hip fracture)
• More in country variation preference sensitive care (cardiac procedures and diagnostic tests)
• Social health insurance based countries report relatively lower variation than tax-based health care systems
• Australia stands out for revascularisation and knee interventions
CABG by Medicare Local, age and sex standardised number per 100,000
population
Knee arthroscopy by Medicare Local, age and sex standardised number per 100,000
population
Hysterectomy rates by Medicare Local and age-standardised number per 1,000 female
population
Age-standardised rates for prostatectomy per 100,000 males
Age-standardised rates of caesarian sections per 1000 live births
Age-standardised rates of hysterectomy per 100,000 females