Delivering TransitionLocal Informatics Transition Programme

Trevor Wright, Programme Director

12th January 2012

Slide 2

Programme UpdateFor Your Delights Today……..

1. Update on the SHA mapping piece – for consideration and approval

2. Update on the PCT Mapping piece and plans for completion

3. Plans to establish SHA Cluster Programmes

An overarching rider:

All proposals relevant to mapping of functions to future state

organisations in the document are presented for consideration only.

It is recognised that final sign-off of mapping and accountability will

need to be approved by the relevant Policy setting organisations (e.g.

NHS-CB) NHS and the Futures Board

Slide 3

Confirmation of the Purpose of this Exercise

A) To support the Workforce data mapping process being led by HR. To identify where current state functions will map to in the future state and to show the current (at a given point in time - currently 30th Sep 2012)

resource levels engaged in the delivery of these functions.

B) To provide planning intelligence for those designing the future state. In doing this the return makes recommendation where (current) functions which will continue to be needed in the future state should be accountable to, and gives an indication of potential deliver models in the future state (based on on-going work at PCT Cluster Level). The work also gives detail re the level of resource (permanent and temporary) currently employed (in the current state) to deliver said function.

Slide 4

SHA Mapping – A SummaryProposed Future State Destination1 w.t.e

Resource (permanent)

w.t.e. Resource (temp)

NHS-CB 32.3 2.3CCGs 50.0 3.4Local Delivery Organisation 23.6 6.3Delivered once where there is a single, clear requirement and where it will be most effective to do so (System-wide Function

Delivery Model)

44.2 1.7

Interim Delivery Organisations (To support Transition)

90.2 7.6

Total 240.2 20.9

Slide 5

SHA Mapping – A Summary

When compared to the Workforce Data (Count = 281 total), there are some anomalies; as follows:

Reason for Difference CountInclusion of staff not managed by CIOs 29Established Vacancies included 6Rounding up during data processing 6Total 41

Slide 6

PCT Mapping – A SummaryProposed Future State Destination Responsibility

(relevant to PCT Informatics function)

NHS-CB AccountableCCGs AccountableCSU/Os DeliveryLocal Provider Trusts (Delivering Informatics to Commissioning Functions)

Delivery

Local HIS (Delivering Informatics to Commissioning Functions)

Delivery

Delivered once where there is a single, clear requirement and where it will be most effective to do so (System-wide

Function Delivery Model)

Delivery

Interim Delivery Organisations (To support Transition)

N/A

Slide 7

PCT Function Mapping – What Next

• Mapping Template modified following validation by DIs Reference Group

• Template and completion guidance issued to SHA Cluster leads to coordinate completion by PCT Clusters by close of play 27th January 2013

• SHA Cluster Leads to provide TW details on PCT Clusters by close of play 13th January 2013

• Additional (Informatics) guidance to be issues to support Workforce Framework Data Collection process (Dec 2011 Data Return)

• Consolidated returns (by PCT Cluster, SHA Cluster and Nationally) to be presented to CIOs Forum for consideration by Tuesday 31st January 2012

• Need for a special CIOs Forum on 31st Jan??