Deitre Epps, Partner Results Leadership Group www ... · Deepen their understanding of Results...
Transcript of Deitre Epps, Partner Results Leadership Group www ... · Deepen their understanding of Results...
FPSI/RLG 1
Deitre Epps, Partner Results Leadership Group www.resultsleadership.org
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 2 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
Your Shared Experiences
• During the last webinar, we invited you to join in the webinar conversation by sharing your experiences with community partnership and other collective impact initiatives.
• Does your community partnership have a clear results statement that aligns multi-sector partners?
• Does your community have a comprehensive community action plan that includes the role and strategies of multiple partners?
Today’s Objectives
By the end of the webinar, participants will:
Deepen their understanding of Results Based Accountability (RBA) and its
application to the conditions of Collective Impact
Understand how RBA can be applied to a shared measurement system
• Distinguishing between population vs. performance data
• Equity Matters: The Importance of disaggregating the data
Understand how they can join a Community of Practice engaging in
shared learning for Achieving Measurable Collective Impact with RBA
Today’s Objectives Sharing My Experiences:
Community Leader
Results Based Facilitator
Executive Coach (community / organization leaders)
Human Services Administrator / Consultant
Program Evaluator
Learning About our Shared Experiences:
All Webinar Poll Participants – Australia, Canada, New Zealand,
South Africa, United Kingdom, United States of America
Developing*a*Community*of*Prac5ce**for*RBA*and*Collec5ve*Impact*
FPSI/RLG 5 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 6
Story behind the baseline
Partners (with a role to play in turning the curve)
What Works
Comprehensive Community Action Plan (with Budget)
Result: All Baltimore City Children Enter Kindergarten Ready to Succeed
Indicator Baseline
How are we doing?
Why?
Help?
Options?
Propose to do?
Turn-the-Curve Thinking™: Talk to Action
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
Five Conditions of Collective Impact A Common Agenda
Shared measurement
Shred Measurment
Mutually reinforcing activities
Continuous communication
A backbone support organization
1. Starting with ends, working backwards to means
2. Data-driven, transparent decision making
1. Affirm an explicit result statement to express the desired condition of well-being for your community partnership’s work together
2. Co-develop a comprehensive action plan with community-wide strategies and partners to implement the plan
Moving Toward Measurable Collective Impact with Common Agendas
FPSI/RLG 10 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
Coming together to collectively define the problem and create a shared vision to solve it. – Collective Impact Forum
FPSI/RLG 11 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
Shared Measurement System What’s that?
Shared Measurement System
agreeing to track progress in the same way,
which allows for continuous improvement
-Collective Impact Forum
Distinguishing �Ends�
FPSI/RLG 13
about the well-being of CLIENT POPULATIONS
about the well-being of WHOLE POPULATIONS
Population Accountability
Performance Accountability
For Communities – Cities – Counties – States - Nations
For Programs – Agencies – and Service Systems
1. Distinguish between population measures (indicators) and performance measures
2. Continuous improvement at all levels: population, service system, organization and program
FPSI/RLG 15
All North Carolinians are Healthy
Obesity rate
A condition of well-being for children, adults, families or communities.
A measure which helps quantify the achievement of a result.
A measure of how well a program, organization or service system is working.
Language Discipline [ ]
Example Sources of Community (Indicator) Data
Ready at Five
http://www.readyatfive.org/school-readiness-data/
jurisdictional-readiness-data-2015.html
Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance
http://bniajfi.org
Health Indicator Warehouse
http://www.healthindicators.gov
FPSI/RLG 17
Right data for useful feedback?
FPSI/RLG 18
Selecting Indicators
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 19
Criteria for
Selecting Indicators
Communication Power
Proxy Power
Data Power
Does the indicator communicate to a broad range of audiences?
Does the indicator say something of central importance about the result? Does the indicator bring along the data “herd”?
Quality data available on a timely basis.
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 20
Choosing Indicators Worksheet
Result: Children Enter Kindergarten Ready to Succeed
Candidate Indicators Communication Power
Proxy Power
Data Power
H M L Measure 1 Measure 2 Measure 3 Measure 4 Measure 5 Measure 6 Measure 7 Measure 8
HData Development Agenda
H M L H M L
H L H H H
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
regetting dySource: Maryland State Department of Education
• 82% of children entering kindergarten in school year 2012-2013 are fully school-ready, up from 49% in 2001-2002 – a 33-point or 67% improvement in overall school readiness.
• Maryland continued to exhibit an overall upward trend and maintained high readiness levels even with the one-point decline from 2011-2012.
Maryland School Readiness (Ready at Five) MMSR, 2012-2013
Note: A “Trendline” denotes the overall upward progression of Maryland’s full school readiness levels.
FPSI/RLG 22
Disaggregating Data
Equity Matters
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
regetting dySource: Maryland State Department of Education
• 76% of Baltimore City’s kindergarten students are fully school-ready in 2013-2014, a 48-point readiness gain from 2001-2002.
• The City’s kindergarteners are within 7 points of their Maryland peers (83% fully ready) and show greater long-term improvements (48 points compared with a 34 point improvement in the state).
Continued Our Strong Progress (Ready at Five) MMSR, 2013-2014
May 2015
readiness matters!
Baltimore City
regetting dy
Moving from Good to Great Ready for Kindergarten (R4K)
R4K has two components:
• An Early Learning Assessment measures the progress of learning in young children, 36 months to school age, in seven domains of learning.
• A Kindergarten Readiness Assessment (KRA) measures school readiness of all incoming kindergarteners in four domains of learning.
regetting dy
Measuring Kindergarten Readiness Kindergarten Readiness Assessment (KRA)
Kindergarteners are assessed as:
• Demonstrating Readiness Consistently exhibits the foundational skills and
behaviors that enable a child to fully participate in the kindergarten curriculum.
• Approaching Readiness Shows some of the foundational skills and behaviors that
are needed to participate in the kindergarten curriculum.
• Emerging Readiness Displays minimal foundational skills and behaviors, which
are needed to meet kindergarten expectations successfully.
regetting dy
Looking At Baltimore City Demographics of Young Children
Population Data U.S. Census, 2013 Children <5 (age 0-4) 41,681 Estimated Children Age 4 8,336
School Enrollment MSDE, School Year 2014-2015 Pre-K Students (4/5-Year-Olds) 4,626
Full-Day Program 100.0% Half-Day Program 0.0%
Percent of 4-Year Olds 55.5%
Kindergarten Students 7,349
Kindergarteners by Ethnicity Kindergarteners by Gender American Indian 0.3% Male 50.6%
Asian 1.0% Female 49.4% African American 78.7% Kindergarteners by Subgroup
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.3% Children with Disabilities 7.9% White 9.4% English Language Learners 6.7%
Hispanic 9.7% Free/Reduced Priced Meals 87.4% Two or More Races 0.7%
regetting dy
Meeting Higher Standards KRA, 2014-2015
Baltimore City Results
• 49% of African American kindergarteners and 35% of Hispanic kindergarteners demonstrate this new level of readiness.
• 56% of females demonstrate kindergarten readiness – 15 points higher than their male peers.
Source: Maryland State Department of Education
regetting dy
Examining the Achievement Gaps KRA, 2014-2015
• 87% of kindergarteners or 6,381 children are from low-income households (as indicated by Free and Reduced Price Meal status).
• National studies show that at least half of the educational achievement gaps between poor and non-poor children already exist at kindergarten entry.2
2 Lee, V. and Burkham, D. (2002). Inequality at the Starting Gate: Social Background Differences in Achievement as Children Begin School. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. www.epinet.org.
46% of children from low-income households are ready for kindergarten, compared with 66% of children from mid- to high-income households.
Source: Maryland State Department of Education
20 pt gap
FPSI/RLG 30
All Maryland Children Enter Kindergarten Ready to Succeed
% Maryland Kindergarteners demonstrating readiness (Note: the assessment tool is not a part of the measure)
A condition of well-being for children, adults, families or communities.
A measure which helps quantify the achievement of a result.
A measure of how well a program, organization or service system is working.
Language Discipline [ ]
31
1. Community Result 2. Indicators 3. Story Behind the Baselines 4. Strategies Programs Program A Program B Program C
Local __________ Federal __________ Businesses _________ Civic __________ Non-profits _________
Program A Performance Measures
Story Behind the Baselines
• Action Plan & Budget
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
Performance measure
Population Indicator
FPSI/RLG 33
Selecting Performance
Measures
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
34
Who$are$our$clients?
What$services$do$we$provide$to$those$clients?
What$is$the$desired$impact*of$those$
services$on$those$clients?
How*are*we*doing*at$achieving$
that$desired$impact?
FPSI/RLG 35
How much did
we do?
The Three Kinds of Program Performance Measures
How well did we do
it?
Is anyone better off?
Quantity Quality
E
ffect
Ef
fort
# %
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 36
Selecting Headline Performance Measures
How much did we do? # Clients/customers served
# Activities (by type of activity)
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
37
Selecting Headline Performance Measures
How much did we do? How well did we do it? % Common measures e.g. workload ratio, staff turnover rate, % staff fully trained, unit cost
% Activity-specific measures e.g. % timely intakes, % accreditation standards met
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
TACS Timelines Attendance Customer Service Completion
Standards
RLG/FSPI
38
Selecting Headline Performance Measures How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off? #/% Skills / Knowledge
(e.g. cognitive, social, physical) #/% Attitude
(e.g. toward language, parenting) #/% Behavior
(e.g. reading to child at home) #/% Circumstances
(e.g. child care, transportation)
How much did we do?
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
BACKS Behavior Attitude Circumstances
Knowledge Skills
FPSI/RLG 39
Story behind the baseline
Partners (with a role to play in turning the curve)
What Works
Quality Improvement / Action Plan (with Budget)
Program:
Performance Measure Baseline
How are we doing?
Why?
Help?
Options?
Propose to do?
Turn-the-Curve Thinking™: Talk to Action
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 40
All North Carolinians are Healthy
Community-Wide Strategy/Partners
Program Performance Measures (baselines)
END
M
EAN
S
Client outcomes END
? X
Population Accountability
Performance Accountability
1. Doing the right things?
2. Doing those things right?
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
RLG/FPSI 41 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 42 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 43
44
1. What is the end that we seek?
2. How are we doing?
3. What is the story behind the data?
4. Who are our partners with a role to play?
Management, Budgeting & Strategic Planning
RLG/FPSI 45
Program
Accountability
RLG 46
Friedman, Mark. Founder of the Fiscal Policy Studies Institute and author of: Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough (Trafford, 2005) www.resultsaccountability.com; www.raguide.org
Kania, John, and Mark Kramer. �Collective Impact.� Stanford Social Innovation Review (2011)
http://ssireview.org/articles/entry/collective_impact/
Ready At Five, School Readiness Data, Readiness Matters www.readyatfive.org
MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
Acknowledgement Portions of these materials draw upon the work of:
Developing*a*Community*of*Prac5ce*RBA*and*Collec5ve*Impact*
47 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 48 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES
FPSI/RLG 49 MEASURABLE RESULTS FOR CLIENTS AND COMMUNITIES