Deficits and Disaster

32
1

description

Deficits and Disaster. Ron Haskins The Brookings Institution September 14, 2010. Thanks to Isabel Sawhill, Alex Gold, Daniel Moskowitz and Mary Baugh. Overview. Big Picture Polls/Public Dialogue Why Deficits Matter Taking Action. The Big Picture I: Budget Projections. Actual. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Deficits and Disaster

Page 1: Deficits and Disaster

1

Page 2: Deficits and Disaster

2

Deficits and Disaster

Ron HaskinsThe Brookings Institution

September 14, 2010

Thanks to Isabel Sawhill, Alex Gold, Daniel Moskowitz and Mary Baugh.

Page 3: Deficits and Disaster

3

Overview• Big Picture• Polls/Public Dialogue• Why Deficits Matter• Taking Action

Page 4: Deficits and Disaster

4

The Big Picture I: Budget Projections

Sources: Actual is from Office of Management and Budget Historical Tables (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/hist01z1.xls); CBO Baseline is from “The Budget and Economic Outlook: An Update,” August 2010 (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/117xx/doc11705/08-18-Update.pdf); Adjusted Baseline is from Auerbach and Gale, “Déjà Vu All Over Again: On the Dismal Prospects for the Federal Budget,” 2010 (http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2010/0429_budget_outlook_gale/0429_budget_outlook_gale.pdf).

Actual CBO Baseline (August 2010) Adjusted Baseline

-1,600

-1,400

-1,200

-1,000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

40020

00

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Surp

lus/

Def

icit,

$B

illio

ns

Page 5: Deficits and Disaster

5

The Big Picture II: Spending and Debt as Percent of GDP, 2010, 2020, 2050

Note: The Medicare category is net of Medicare premiums and payments.Source: Congressional Budget Office, Alternative Fiscal Scenario, The Long Term Budget Outlook, June 2010.

4.8 5.1

12.9

1.4

9.4

5.26.5

10.4

3.8

6.65.9

12.4

16.5

26.0

10.4

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Social Security Medicare,Medicaid, CHIP,and Exchange

Subsidies

All OtherNoninterest

Net Interest Deficit

Debt

as

Perc

ent o

f GDP

2010 2020 2050

Page 6: Deficits and Disaster

6

The Big Picture III: Rising Debt/GDP Ratio

6287

146

233

344

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Year

Deb

t as

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

Source: Congressional Budget Office, Alternative Fiscal Scenario, The Long Term Budget Outlook, June 2010.

Page 7: Deficits and Disaster

7

The Big Picture IV: Unsustainable Spending

Sources: Congressional Budget Office, “Historical Budget Data” (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/AppendixF.shtml) and Congressional Budget Office, Alternative Fiscal Scenario, The Long Term Budget Outlook, June 2010.

Social Security

Medicare, Medicaid, Exchange

Subsidies, and CHIP

Net Interest

Average Federal Revenue, 1970-

2009

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080

Year

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

Page 8: Deficits and Disaster

8

Polls: The Deficit Is Top Priority

605358

5355

56

35

4051

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Perc

ent W

ho S

ay D

efic

it Is

Top

Prio

rity

Source: Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, various years.

Page 9: Deficits and Disaster

9

Polls: Public Worried About Deficits14%

11% 11%

8%7%

6%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

Mos

t Im

port

ant P

robl

em 2

5 Ye

ars

from

Now

(Per

cent

)

Source: Gallup, March 4-7, 2010.

Page 10: Deficits and Disaster

10

Polls: Public Support for Sacrifice

18%

69%

13%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Yes No Not sure

Source: Rasmussen, April 27-28, 2010.

30%

62%

5% 3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Willing Not willing Some, butnot others

Unsure / Noanswer

Source: CBS News / New York Times Poll, February 2010.

45%

51%

2% 2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Willing Not Willing Some, butnot others

Unsure / Noanswer

Source: CBS News / New York Times Poll, February 2010.

Willing to pay higher taxes

Willing to decrease spending on health care or education

Willing to decrease military spending

Page 11: Deficits and Disaster

11

Polls: Willingness to Cut Specific Programs

Source: The Economist / YouGov Poll, April 3-6, 2010.

6

7

7

11

12

12

12

13

17

19

22

22

27

27

27

29

71

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Veterans' Benefits

Social Security

Medicare

Medicaid

None of the Above

Education

Highw ays

Health Research

Aid to the Poor

Unemployment Benefits

Science and Technology

National Defense

Mass Transit

Agriculture

Housing

The Environment

Foreign Aid

Percent Supporting Specific Cuts

Page 12: Deficits and Disaster

12

Polls: Support for Specific Solutions

Source: Bloomberg Poll, December 2009.

20

23

26

57

66

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

New federal consumption tax

Cut spending growth on entitlement programs

Raise taxes on the middle-class as well as the wealthy

Cut discretionary federal programs

Raise income taxes on wealthy (individuals making$500,000; households>$1 million)

Perecent Supporting Specific Solutions

Page 13: Deficits and Disaster

13

Good News: Attitudes Change in Response to Dialogue

• Dialogues with public on Social Security, Medicare, and taxes

• Conducted by Viewpoint Learning in collaboration with other organizations

• 12 day-long dialogues all over the country• Representative sample of 35-45 participants

Page 14: Deficits and Disaster

14

Dialogues with the Public: Medicare– 68% support gradually raising the age of

eligibility from 65 to 67 – 68% support progressive scaling of

premiums to income – 79% support raising taxes to maintain

benefit levels– 75% support a 2-3% national sales tax– 63% support raising the payroll tax rate

Page 15: Deficits and Disaster

15

Dialogues with the Public: Taxes• Participants are willing to pay higher taxes if

they are sure that their tax dollars are well spent for reducing deficit or for earmarked purposes they consider important.

• 57% support raising taxes to reduce the deficit• 67% support investment in education and

transportation even if taxes increase

Page 16: Deficits and Disaster

16

Why Deficits Matter• Dependence on foreign lenders• Rapidly rising interest costs • Burden on future generations• Limited ability to invest in children• Limited ability to address emergencies

Page 17: Deficits and Disaster

17

Dependence on Foreigners

49%

30% 32%36%

41% 42% 41%

47%44%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Trill

ions

of C

urre

nt D

olla

rs

Foreign Holdings of Treasury Securities Domestic Holdings of Treasury Securities

Source: U.S. Treasury Department and U.S. Bureau of Public Debt (though June 2009).

Page 18: Deficits and Disaster

18

Rapidly Rising Interest Costs

Source: Congressional Budget Office, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: An Update,” August 2010, Table 1-2, (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/117xx/doc11705/BudgetProjections.xls).

187 202 225259

326

410

492

564

623676

726778

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Year

Bill

ions

of C

urre

nt D

olla

rs

Page 19: Deficits and Disaster

19

Burden on Future Generations

Page 20: Deficits and Disaster

20

Spending On Children and The Elderly

$8,942

$2,895

$21,904 $21,144

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

Public Spending Federal Spending

Spending Per Child

Spending Per Person 65and Older

Source: Julia B. Isaacs, How Much Do We Spend on Children and the Elderly (Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 2009).

Page 21: Deficits and Disaster

21

Productive Investments in Children• Preschool Education• Home Visiting• Teen Pregnancy Prevention• Career Academies• K-12 Education, Especially KIPP Schools• Second Chance Programs for Teens• Community and Family-based Programs for

Delinquents• Community College Interventions• Small Schools of Choice

Page 22: Deficits and Disaster

22

Limited Ability to Address Emergencies

• Wars and Terrorists Attacks

• Natural Disasters

• Recessions

Page 23: Deficits and Disaster

23

Taking Action: Preconditions• Public recognition that deficits are a problem• Public willingness to pay new taxes and accept

spending cutbacks• Everything on the table• Bipartisanship• Presidential Leadership

Page 24: Deficits and Disaster

24

Taking Action: General Rules• Recognition of short-term vs. long-term impacts• Combination of spending cuts and revenue

incentives• No implementation until economy is in recovery• Implement cuts gradually over a period of years• Savings must come from big three

entitlements: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security

Page 25: Deficits and Disaster

25

Average Number of Years Spent in Retirement: 1950 and 2006

Source: Isabel V. Sawhill, “Paying for Investments in Children,” in Big Ideas for Children: Investing in Our Nation’s Future, edited by First Focus (Washington, D.C.: First Focus, 2008).

Page 26: Deficits and Disaster

26

Selected Statistics for the Elderly and Non-Elderly

Source: Isabel V. Sawhill, “Paying for Investments in Children,” in Big Ideas for Children: Investing in Our Nation’s Future, edited by First Focus (Washington, D.C.: First Focus, 2008); updated with data for 2007 where available.

Page 27: Deficits and Disaster

27

Taking Action: Social Security Reforms

3050

90100

5060

3030

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Increase the Payroll Tax Rate By 1 Percentage Point in 2012

Increase the Payroll Tax Rate by 3 Percentage Points Over 20Years

Tax Covered Earnings Above the Taxable Maximum; Do NotIncrease Benefits

Reduce PIA Factors to Index Initial Benefits to Prices RatherThan Earnings

Lower Initial Benefits to Top 70 percent of Earners

Index Earnings in the AIME and Bend Points in the PIAFormula to Prices

Raise the Full Retirement Age to 70

Reduce COLA by 0.5 percentage points

Percentage Impact on Actuarial Balance

Source: Congressional Budget Office, “Summary Figure 1,” in Social Security Policy Options, summary (2010).

Page 28: Deficits and Disaster

28

Taking Action: Health Care Reform• Is Obama reform the solution or part of the problem?• New costs

– Guaranteed access to a basic package– Subsidies related to income; Medicaid expansion– The Class Act

• Offsets to costs– Taxation of high-end plans– Medicare cuts– Employer and individual fees for not participating– “Bending the curve” (e.g., IT, evidence-based medicine, more

coordination, Medicare Commission)• But very unlikely that we can restrain costs enough to prevent growth

of government or reduce current projected deficits• Two possible choices

– Caps on spending (implicit rationing)– A new source of revenue to cover cost; e.g., VAT

Page 29: Deficits and Disaster

29

Taking Action: Four Revenue Options• Increase income tax rates• Broaden the income tax base (reduce tax

expenditures)• Increase energy taxes• Impose consumption taxes

Source: William Gale, Brookings Institution, 2010.

Page 30: Deficits and Disaster

30

Cost of Selected Tax Expenditures:Average Annual Cost (2009-2013)

Tax ExpenditureAverage Cost

(billions)Deduction for mortgage interest $114.58

Exclusion of employer contributions for health care $113.64

Reduced rates of tax on dividends and long-term capital gains $83.76

Credit for children under age 17 $32.06

Exclusion of capital gains at death $31.88

Exclusion of investment income on life insurance and annuity contracts for insurance companies $31.78

Deduction for property taxes on real property $25.14

Exclusion of Medicare supplementary medical insurance (Part B) $23.94

Exclusion on capital gains on sales of principal residences $17.32

Credit for alcohol fuels $8.38

Exclusion of Medicare prescription drug insurance (Part D) $5.76

Exclusion of employer-paid transportation benefits $4.30

Source: Joint Committee on Taxation, “Table 1: Tax Expenditure Estimates By Budget Function, Fiscal Years 2009-2013,” in Estimates of Federal Tax Expenditures for Fiscal Years 2009-2013 (Washington, D.C.: Author, 2010).

Page 31: Deficits and Disaster

31

Class Act• Long-term care insurance• Short-term savings (2010-2019): $57.8 billion• Long-term costs:

– Adverse selection– CBO: “The program would add to

future federal budget deficits in a large and growing fashion.”

Page 32: Deficits and Disaster

32