Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and...
-
Upload
constance-davis -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and...
Defense Forum:Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues
VADM Nancy BrownThe Joint Staff (J-6)ModeratorDirector, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Directorate
SIPRNET
US EmbassyKuwait
US EmbassyKSA
US EmbassyEgypt
US EmbassyJordan
US EmbassyQatar
US EmbassyUAE
US EmbassyOman
US EmbassyBahrain
CJTF-Kuwait
JTF-SWAKSA
TCCCBahrain
NAVCENTBahrain
KSA Egypt Jordan UAE Oman Qatar Bahrain
GatewayFacilities
Coalition Partner Facilities
HeadquartersUK - PJHQ
Kuwait
Globalization – Community Issue
• Complexities of globalization – Resources and infrastructure required to manage and maintain
– Foreign disclosure
– COI information separation
• Current architecture and supporting requirements are currently being piece-mealed vice having a global perspective.
EXAMPLE Of PROBLEM
SIPR
TBMCS
Coalition GCCS
GCCS
Shared to Command GCCS
US//Coalition-Exchange E-Mail Server
Coalition - JOCS
ATO/ACOPlain Text
ATO/ACOPlain Text
Via JOCS to AOR
US JOC
ATO/ACO
COP Data
US to Coalition ATO/ACO/COP Data Flow
Limited interoperability frustrates our ability to share information with mission partners
• Organizing/integrating construct for IT, NSS, and IT Resource Management
• Includes the connected people, processes, and equipment to support DoD and Warfighter mission
• All DoD Components are entities within this environment not pieces, parts, connective tissue or backbone but entities
• DoD Components must exercise authorities and processes to ensure that this environment is:
– Interoperable, supportable, enabler of DoD and Warfighter mission success
Today’s Global Environment
Connected IT/NSS
Program Program Program Program Program Program
Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio PortfolioPortfolios
CapabilityCapabilityCapability CapabilityCapabilityCapabilityCapabilityCapabilityCapability
Programs
Capabilities
DOTMLPF
US-Mission PartnerEnvironment
-E-mail, Web, Service Oriented Architectures (SOAs)- Enterprise Services, Tailorable/User
– Defined/Shareable COP-Comprehensive/Universal Data Standards/Tagging
-Event-, Role-, and Content-Based Sharing- Identity Management
-Combined Tactics and Procedures
Coalition Information Exchange VisionNetwork Enterprise for Seamless Information Sharing
Common Suite of Information Services to All Mission Partners with Controlled Access to C2/Intel Applications on a Common Network – Access is Based on Country Trust
and User Role
Panel Question?
"What are your greatest barriers, challenges or impediments to delivering
operational agility?"
Our collective efforts are essential to this nation’s ability to enable net-centric forces today and tomorrow
Maj Gen Alan CowlesNational Guard Bureau (J-6)Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Division
Homeland Defense in DepthAn Operational Force—A National Asset
National Interest/Control, Decentralized Execution
Operational Title 32 MilitaryCivil
Overseas Conflict
BorderSecurityLocal & State
CrisisManagement
Preemptive andRetaliatory Strikes
MissileDefense/
Air Sovereignty
Law Enforcement(MSCLEA)
Regional ConsequenceManagement
(EMAC)
AirportSecurity
Local & State ConsequenceManagement
Counter Narco-
Terrorism
Physicalor CyberAttack onHomeland
NationalSecuritySpecialEvents
CriticalInfrastructure
Protection(CIP)
2 Swiftlydefeat
efforts intwo regions
1 Win
decisivelyin oneregion
1 Defense of the Homeland
TheaterSecurity
Cooperation
Governor/State Equities4
Deter forward in
four critical regions
A Joint Operational View of all NG IT Attributes
GAPState/Territory
EmergencyOperations Center
(EOC)
INCIDENTAREA
Incident Command SystemMobile Incident Command PostCivilian Emergency Responders
GAP
C2, Info Sharing, Collaboration, and/or
Coordination Requirements
GAP
GAP
Combatant Commanders (JOC/TNCC)
& Interagency Partners
GAPANGOperationsCenter
ARNGOperationsCenter
JOC/JCCC
Other Stakeholders
Other JFHQ-StateFEMA Regional Opns Ctr
FBI—State-LevelState Agencies
Others
Other StakeholdersLocal EOCs
Coord Officers(SCO/FCO/DCO)
FEMA/FBI—Incident AreaOthers
JFHQ-StateJOC/C4
Management
AOR-Level
State/Territory-Level
Incident-Level
• National Guard• Active Component• Other RCs
Federal Response Request
HLD/DSCAMilitary Response
Active Duty Other RCs
Joint Task Force(Title 10/32)
GAP
GAP Operational Process and Supporting IT Requirements
NGB
TA
CT
ICA
LO
PE
RA
TIO
NA
LS
TA
TE
GIC
Federal Military
State Civilian
State Military
Shape and Color Legend
State JFHQ JOC & NOC
JTF JOC (T32)
JTF JOC (T10)
State EOC
COCOM JOCs & TNCCs
NGB JOC and JCCC
JTF Comms Support
Element(s)
NG Air Bases
NG Armories
Local EOC(s)
Incident Site
Command Post(s)
JTF (T10/32)
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
- Parallel- Redundant- Seamless Connectivity- 24x7 Situational Awareness- Adaptive Routing as opposed to Deterministic Routing- Multiple Levels of Classification- Multiple Levels of Trust
Identification and Authentication
Multi-agency Horizontal Information Sharing
Content Delivery Network
Federal Civilian
DHS HSOCFBI SIOC
JCCSE Information
Sharing Environment
NG JIEE Full Access
NG JIEE Limited Access
Increasing Capabilities
Enhancements
Event Driven Data Architecture
Mission Data linked to Events
Situation Reporting
Standardized Battle Update Brief
AKO Single Sign On / CAC - enabled
Web Services Enabled (.NET Platform)
Available to Federal and State Mission Partners over AKO.
Enhancements
Event Driven Data Architecture
Mission Data linked to Events
Situation Reporting
Standardized Battle Update Brief
AKO Single Sign On / CAC - enabled
Web Services Enabled (.NET Platform)
Available to Federal and State Mission Partners over AKO.
Enhancements
Implement formal Configuration Management processes for JIEE and plan for upcoming releases
Discover State Interoperability Functional Requirements and Validate
Provide enhancements approved by Stakeholders
Enhancements
Implement formal Configuration Management processes for JIEE and plan for upcoming releases
Discover State Interoperability Functional Requirements and Validate
Provide enhancements approved by Stakeholders
Enhancements
Critical State level data integration and interoperability
Initial Integrated Portal and GIS Capability based on Requirements
Additional Discovery and Analysis of potential requirements
Enhancements
Critical State level data integration and interoperability
Initial Integrated Portal and GIS Capability based on Requirements
Additional Discovery and Analysis of potential requirements
Enhancements
Additional State Interoperability
NG COP Integration•Critical asset tracking•Layer management
DHS Common Operational Database Initial data sharing
TBD
Enhancements
Additional State Interoperability
NG COP Integration•Critical asset tracking•Layer management
DHS Common Operational Database Initial data sharing
TBD
JIEEV4.1JIEEV4.1
JIEEV4.XJIEEV4.X
JIEEV5.0
JIEEV5.0
TBD TBD TBD
JIEE V6?
JIEE V6?
TBD
TBDTBD
Phase I Phase IIIPhase II Future
JIEE 4.0
JIEE 4.0
June 2007
Event-Driven Database
Proposed Capability Delivery Phases
Strategic Information Sharing ChallengesMilitary – Civilian Mission Integration
• Coalition Policy / Governance– Enabling a Military-Civilian netcentric environment (coordinate JCCSE
Initiative, DoD ISE, PM ISE, DHS HSIN initiatives)– Ensure mission information sharing environment is fully validated
from “end to end” and adjust policies as necessary to enable agile coalition environment
– Interagency coordination around capability management, leveraging capabilities (e.g., FEMA State Interop Initiative or JIEE use by USNORTHCOM)
• Operational Issues– Interagency Information Management (DHS, DOD, NGB) Planning
Underway and Draft IM Plan developed– Exercise the IM Plan / Information Sharing Environment and provide
feedback to improve IM and synchronize mission essential processes– Operation Control Group (OCG) as interagency group supporting IM
evolution
Strategic Information Sharing ChallengesMilitary – Civilian Mission Integration
• Developing an HLD/DSCA “Enterprise” Architecture– State and Federal Information Sharing infrastructure to enable
interoperability– Coordinate network / IA policies and provisioning of capabilities
to support mission integration
We have made great advancements…
but we have not reached the end-state…yet.
RDML Kendall CardUS Northern Command (J-6)
Director, Command Control Systems
Dimensions of Information Sharing
Unclas
InternetLaw Enforcement Sensitive
FBI
Medical Sensitive
Can
ada
Mex
ico
US
Oth
er
Can
ada
Mex
ico
Oth
er
Law Enforcement Sensitive
FBI
Medical SensitiveU
SUnclas
Internet
SecretReleasable
SecretNOFORN
Can
ada
Mex
ico
US
Oth
er
Law Enforcement Sensitive
FBI
Medical SensitiveUnclas
Internet
SecretReleasable
SecretNOFORN
DHS NORAD-USNORTHCOMNational Guard
FEMA DHS NCS JTF-NARNORTH JTF-CSLATX FL
UsersUsersRegistered and
Authorized
DataDataTagged
SecretReleasable
SecretNOFORN
Centrally managed and funded, redundant, GIG-centric, protected, endurable, survivable system of systems which enables optimal Multinational Information Sharing and cross domain execution, providing enterprise secure access to the edge.
….and World Peace
What I REALLY need is a ….
BG Mark BowmanUS Central Command (J-6)Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems
“It takes a Network to defeat a Network”
Challenge
• Current multinational information exchange frameworks are cumbersome for the user and increasingly unsupportable for the maintainer
• Why?– Current policy requires physically separated networks for
each community of interest (COI) and classification domain
– Information exchange between these multiple networks induces the requirement for multiple Cross Domain Solutions (CDS)
Impact of Multiple Networks
USCENTCOM HQ: 10 different networks Affordable separation technologies are evolving, yet still immature
Cross Domain Solution Process/Standardization
Bridging the Information Sharing Gap
Standardization
Process
3-13 months
33 Guards inUSCENTCOM
AOR
Information Sharing Architect
• DoD needs a dedicated Information Sharing Architect– The UCDMO construct for information protection is a good
start, however….
– A similar organization is required to develop key multinational information exchange requirements and operational architectures• Establish best-of-breed process to “down select” from existing
solutions (close fight)
• Determine which capabilities are ready for programmatic insertion (near term fight)
• Identify capability gaps for the science and technology community to research (deep fight)
Single Policy Framework for Information Separation
EAL/SMLPL
SABI
TSABI
CDS
UCDMODNI - CIO DOD - CIO
• PL – Protection Level• EAL – Evaluation Assurance Level• SML – Strength of Mechanism Level
• SABI – Secret and Below Interoperability • TSABI – Top Secret and Below Interoperability • CDS – Cross Domain Solutions
Funding
SIPRNET/ SIPRNET/ REL DMZ REL DMZ
CENTRIXSCENTRIXS
=
= ?
Summary
IncentivizedIndustry Partners
Funding
Architect
Policy Technology
Brig Gen Dave WarnerDefense Information Systems Agency (DISA)Director of C2 Programs, PEO C2C
Unclassified
Unclassified
Tenets of Net-Centric WarfareTenets of Net-Centric Warfare
DoDDoDNet-CentricNet-Centric
Data StrategyData Strategy
InformationInformationAssuranceAssurance
StrategyStrategy
Global Global ConnectivityConnectivity
(Transformational(TransformationalCommunications)Communications)
Core EnterpriseCore EnterpriseServicesServices(NCES)(NCES)
Global connectivity, real-time collaboration, and rapid and continuous information exchange
Global connectivity, real-time collaboration, and rapid and continuous information exchange
29
C2 Apps
Unclassified
Unclassified
Capabilities RequiredCapabilities Required
1. Ability to share, collaborate, and synchronize information with mission partners
2. Ability to interoperate with and leverage mission partners
3. Ability to extend MNIS capabilities to mission partners
4. Resolving non-materiel information sharing approaches is essential regardless of the material approach chosen
ObserveOrient
Act
Decide
Compress and facilitate!
Unclassified
Unclassified
Coalition Information Sharing (CIS) ProblemCoalition Information Sharing (CIS) Problem (Today – Stove-piped)(Today – Stove-piped)
• Timelines to establish domains are long
• Neither Standard nor Transparent
• Drives “swivel chair” Gymnastics
• Dis-connected National C2 networks
• Need to know vs. Obligation to share
Physical Netting
Unclassified
Unclassified
Then …December 2004
• DISA assume lead for CENTRIXS
• Began centralizing PACOM and CENTCOM CENTRIXS and Global Griffin
Shifting From Regional to Enterprise FocusShifting From Regional to Enterprise Focus
Now …Since September 2006• Griffin develops new services to support allied operations
– Bi-Lateral CHAT / Web Services• CENTRIXS remains regionally focused, but…
– Re-Engineering the larger CENTRIXS networks – Transitioning additional CENTCOM, PACOM and National Enclave services – Mapping regional CENTRIXS networks for the first time– QDR footprint Expansion in five COCOM AORs
Next …not your current MNIS PMO• MNIS Objective Capability AoA kick-off September 2007
– Draft AoA to influence POM 10
– JROC submission by Spring 2008
• MNIS Objective Capability ICD expected in December 2007• CCER Funding Proposal submitted for FY09-11• Transferring network services to GIG Enterprise Services FY08
• Planning future coalition enterprise services & capabilities
Unclassified
Unclassified
CCER OverviewCCER Overview Spiral 1Spiral 1
What CCER Brings:
- Net-Centric approach (Global Enterprise)
- Single common coalition network environment (CMIL)
- Centralized network management
- Common core applications (NCES and NECC)
- Ability to quickly build / scale COIs
- Ability to seamlessly expand network
- Reduces cross domain requirements
- Reduces O&M
Convergence:GCTF & MCFI (Spiral 1)
Current
Logical vs. Physical
Coalition “Four-eyes”
COCOM
EMBASSIES
CFE
COCOM
EMBASSIES
GCTF
Global Counterterrorism Task Force
COALITION PARTNERS
Multinational Coalition Forces - Iraq
COCOM
EMBASSIES
COALITION PARTNERSMCFI
Embassies
Coalition Partners
COCOMs
CMIL.MIL
6
Unclassified
Unclassified
Coalition Info Sharing RoadmapCoalition Info Sharing Roadmap
PhysicalSeparation
Current - 2009
HybridSeparation2010-2012
LogicalSeparation2013-2016
CCERAssess Tech, Dev, Test
COCOM/COI CENTRIC PARTIAL ENTERPRISE CENTRIC
ENTERPRISE CENTRIC
CCER
AISEnables:
NECCNCESDISN
Info Sharing I-PlanCoalition IS CONOPS
CCER CONOPSCCER Migration Plan
Griffin Griffin
CFE, ISAF, CNFC, CENTRIXS- J / K, Bi-lats…
ExtraNet – UnclassStd, Dev, Test
DOD ExtraNet Portal
CDS Baseline Enterprise CDS
EnterpriseGateways
OB
JEC
TIV
E S
YS
TEM
MNIS/AIS AOA
CENTRIXS Consolidate/ Standardize svcs @ DECCs
PK Enabled
Unclassified
Unclassified
ConclusionConclusion
• What we need help with from Industry!
– Standardized Open Architecture
– Data Tagged
– IA Built In
– Common Solutions
Brig Gen Bradley ButlerHQ Air Force Space CommandDirector, Logistics and Warfighting IntegrationChief Information Officer
Expeditionary Air and Space Force
Information is a Information is a KEYKEY part of the equation part of the equation
Lean LethalLean Lethal
LightLight
Ensure Availability, Sustainability & Integration of ICBM & Space C2 & ISR Systems
JOB #1:
CIO
Better IT Tools (Information/Knowledge) for AFSPC Airmen and Their Families
-- Wherever They Live and Work!
AFSPC A4/6 Focus Areas
Integrating and Delivering Space Capabilities and Effects for the Joint and Coalition Warfighters
JFCC SPACEJFCC SPACE
Joint Space Operations Center
Coordination & Direct Support
Optimizes Assigned/Attached Space ForcesOptimizes Assigned/Attached Space ForcesThrough the Joint Space Tasking Order (JSTO)Through the Joint Space Tasking Order (JSTO)
CDR JFCC SPACECDR JFCC SPACE
- Monitor & - Monitor & RedirectRedirect
Combat PlansCombat Plans
- Produce - Produce JSTOJSTO
Combat OpsCombat Ops
- Target & - Target & AssessAssess
ISRISR
- Define - Define ObjectivesObjectives
StrategyStrategy
CDRUSSTRATCOMCDRUSSTRATCOM
JSpOC DirectorJSpOC Director
Integrated SpaceIntegrated SpaceEffects SupportingEffects Supporting
JFC ObjectivesJFC Objectives
THEATER JFACC & DIRSPACEFORDIRSPACEFOR
NAVY
Socorro
JFCC SPACE Presentation of Forces
AIR FORCE
ARMY
Guam
Prospect Harbor
Stennis Space CenterPoint Mugu
Schriever
Camp Roberts
Fort MeadeFort Detrick
Stuttgart
Fort Buckner
Osan
Landstuhl
ColoradoSprings
Qatar
Diego Garcia
Clear
Thule
FylingdalesOakhanger
Moron
Ascension
Antigua
Kaena PtMaui
Kwajalein
Cape Cod
New Boston
Beale
Holloman
Cavalier
Peterson
SchrieverBuckley
Cheyenne Mtn
EglinCape Canaveral
Onizuka
AF Fence
Patrick
Vandenberg
SocorroDahlgren
On Any Given Day…
USNORTHCOM
USPACOM
USSOUTHCOM
USEUCOM
USCENTCOM
Exercises
OIF/OEFHurricaneNuclear Posturing
43
Space Capabilities: Critical to Military Operations
Position, Navigation &Timing (PNT)
• Enroute navigation for all forces• Precision-guided munitions• Personnel & aircraft tracking in
support of Combat Search & Rescue (CSAR)
• Network timing source• Launch vehicle tracking
Missile Warning (MW)• Force protection posturing• Geolocate for attack ops• Cueing data for missile
defense• Cueing for CSAR
SatelliteCommunications
• Land, sea & air forces comm• Emergency Action Messages• Unmanned Aerial System Ops• C2 dissemination (CTO)• Theater broadcast
Environmental Monitoring
• Mission Planning• Munitions loading decisions• MW conditions assessment• CONUS weather monitoring &
forecasting• Solar activity impacts to space
operations & communications
Focus Areas/Challenges“Where we need to Improve”
Schriever IV Wargame – “Big Ten”Schriever IV Wargame – “Big Ten”
Objective 1 (Defend/Augment/Replace)1. Defensive Counterspace Ops Planning2. Space Situational Awareness3. Required SpaceArchitecture4. Operationally Responsive Space
Objective 2 (C2 Relationships)5. Decide – Observe – Act Construct6. Global / Regional Aspect of Space
Objective 3 (Integrated Operations)7. Evolution from Big 2 to Big 48. Coalition Operations
Objective 4 (Homeland Defense)9. Space Support to Homeland Defense
Space Policy & Rules of Engagement (ROE)10. Sufficiency of Space Policy & ROE
We need to shift from:
“Force Enhancement”
to
“Responsive Force Enhancement”
in a
“Contested Environment”Gen Bob Kehler
AFSPC/CC
Fly – Fight – Win
Space Situation Awareness (SSA)
Spacecraft are now threatened in every orbit, at all altitudes by both Directed Energy and Kinetic Energy weapon systems
Current systems are taxed to keep up with space awareness demands Ground-based space surveillance systems
Space is no longer a sanctuary; National Space Policy mandates protection of space assets
Fly – Fight – Win
Monitoring U.S. space assets, capabilities, and
operations
Intelligence on adversary space
activities
Space Situation Awareness (SSA)
SSA is knowledge of all aspects of space. Achieving it requires:
Surveillance of all space objects and space
activities
Detailed reconnaissance of
space objects of interest
Monitoring and analyzing conditions in the space
environment
Conducting integrated tasking, processing,
fusion, analysis, dissemination, archiving
Interoperability--Enablers & Solutions
• Architectures – Know Roles & Players
• SOA Framework is key – Universal Core Services
• Data – Leverage COIs (e.g. SSA COI)
• What do I need?
• Who has it?
• How do I get it?
• Cross-Domain Sharing
• Fusion Tools
• Collaboration Tools
• Wargaming & Experimentation
• Integrated space, air & ground capabilities & support for COCOMS
• Explore Title 50, 10 & 32 policy seams
• Explore & Tighten Relationships/TTPs• JSpOC & NROC • JFCC Space & JTF-GNO—e.g. Leverage Transformational Comm
Warfighter Focus Always !!!Warfighter Focus Always !!!DIRSPACEFOR in COCOMSDIRSPACEFOR in COCOMS
Space Impact to Theater“Improving Interoperability”
• Increased dependence on space demands increased Increased dependence on space demands increased space integrationspace integration
• More calls for space pros in theaterMore calls for space pros in theater
• Tightly integrated day-to-day reachback supportTightly integrated day-to-day reachback support
• Effects focused operations at tactical space unitsEffects focused operations at tactical space units
Detailed, real-time collaboration must occur to Detailed, real-time collaboration must occur to ensure dependable and continuous space effectsensure dependable and continuous space effects
49
““Critical Enablers for Joint Critical Enablers for Joint Warfighting”Warfighting”
““There’s no GIG (There’s no GIG (GlobalGlobal Information Grid) Information Grid)
Without Without SpaceSpace!!”!!”
Space Capabilities/Effects Space Capabilities/Effects and and
Warfighting IntegrationWarfighting Integration
50
Space-enabled Warfighter
Defense Forum:Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues
Questions?
Defense Forum:Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues