Defending democracy ‘beyond the state’ Towards a Europeanization of national militant...
-
Upload
jeffery-atkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Defending democracy ‘beyond the state’ Towards a Europeanization of national militant...
Defending democracy ‘beyond the state’
Towards a Europeanization of national militant restrictions
dealing with extremism?
Nefeli Lefkopoulou
Defending democracy
Concept of militant democracy : introduced by Karl Loewenstein
Repressive stance with inclusionist strategies : Giovanni Capoccia
Repressive legislation : very broad ground of measures
National state approach on defending democracy
Viability & opportunity of national institutional frameworks
Cross national variation in legal restrictions
An approach leaving out …
possible interstate interactions
dialogue between national and European defensiveness
The EU and the challenge of extremism
Rise of extreme right parties
Responsibility role
Management of the crisis
at the EU level
European community of values
Values common to the MS
An established basis of agreement
Common and thus shared ?
Functional challenge : factors of national order
Partisan loyalties
Pre electoral contexts
Cultural differences
Towards a Europeanization of defending democracy (1) ?
Two – way process : uploading and downloading mechanisms
Codification mission : convergence between national militant restrictions
Towards a Europeanization of defending democracy (2) ?
Bottom – up approach :
How can different ‘national defending democracies’ affect the policy of the EU in intervening for combating extremism ?
Towards a Europeanization of defending democracy (3) ?
Up – down approach :
How does the depth of EU integration matter for MS to commit to EU democratic values ?
Logical assumptions
the stronger the adherence of a Member State to the EU democratic values, the higher the probability of adequate defending mechanisms at the national level
the higher the danger of extremism at a national level (crisis moments) and the more shocking to the public the extreme right parties’ activity, the higher the probability for the EU to develop stricter defending mechanisms at the EU level
Hypotheses
Principal : The level of Europeanized defensive mechanisms dealing with extremism is increasing over time and the anti-extremist institutional design is becoming more sophisticated
Subsidiary : The national government’s policy plays a more influential role in the process of downloading and uploading defensive mechanisms
Possible case studies (1)
Weaknesses of autonomous national responses : NPD (Germany), Golden Dawn (Greece)
Possible case studies (2)
Limitations of an autonomous EU intervention : Haider affair as a precedent, Hungary (Constitution changes)
Methodology
Dependent variable : the level of existing defensiveness at the national level
Independent variables : the depth of the EU integration of each MS, the level of adherence to the EU community of values, the occurrence of crisis moments, the public opinion’s reaction, the EU’s degree of interference
Empirical tools Euro barometers
Qualitative surveys
Reports by HR Commissioners
Identifying barriers
Interviews
Fact-finding meetings
Transferability
Successful defending mechanisms from one MS to another
Learning from the US model?
US system as a tool in the attempt to verify how Europeanization could be operationalized
Relegation of laws to state and federal legislatures
Limitations of exporting a US model
Primordial difference in the legal nature of the two systems
Cultural discrepancies on restrictions on freedom of speech