Decreased fetal movements 2017

62
Decreased fetal movements (DFM) Alarm before fetal death Ahmad S Soliman Lecturer of Obstetrics and gynecology Department Benha University Hospital

Transcript of Decreased fetal movements 2017

Page 1: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Decreased fetal movements (DFM) Alarm before fetal death

Ahmad S SolimanLecturer of Obstetrics and gynecology

DepartmentBenha University Hospital

Page 2: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Objectives

• Normal FETAL MOVEMENTS

• DFMC

• Factors affecting FM

• Optimal management

Page 3: Decreased fetal movements 2017

“I AM A FETUS IN THE WOMB 

I FEAR IT MAY BECOME MY TOMB 

IF ONLY I COULD GIVE A SHOUT 

TO MAKE MY DOCTOR 

GET ME OUT.

I have no energy to move; I

am struggling to keep my

mom smiling

I am moving ; I am alive

Page 4: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Why we try to put a title decreased perception of fetal movement ???

Page 5: Decreased fetal movements 2017

In their 8th annual report (London 2001) The Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI) under the umbrella of NICE reviewed 422 stillbirths and found that 69 cases (16.4%) were related to altered or reduced fetal movements.

Over 55% of women experiencing a stillbirth perceive a reduction in fetal movements prior to diagnosis (Efkarpidis et al., 2004).

Early recognition of (DFM) makes it possible for the clinician to intervene at a stage when the fetus is still compensated, and thus prevent progression to fetal or neonatal injury or death.(Heazell et al; 2008).

Ahmad saber
National institute of clinical excellence
Page 6: Decreased fetal movements 2017

PREVALENCE

40 % of pregnant women experience DFM one or more times during pregnancy most of them are transient.(Saastad et al; 2012).

Ahmad saber
so decreased perception of fetal movement is not a one way ticket toword fetal death
Page 7: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Types of Fetal movements

• Limb movement. (short duration-variable amplitude)

• Rolling movement : Due to changing position. (long duration-high amplitude).

• Respiratory movement

• Hiccough like movement.

• OTHER activities like suckling the thumb or blinking.

Page 8: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Start around 20 weeks gestation peak at 28- 34 weeks gestation (Mangesi & Hofmeyr, 2007).

N.B: Multiparous may notice movements earlier (16-20 wks) than primi (20-22 wks gestation) (Grant et al., 1989).

Fetal movements tend to plateau at 32 weeks of gestation

No reduction in the frequency of fetal movements in the late third trimester.

Maternal perception of fetal movement

Ahmad saber
indicates fetal well being
Page 9: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Fetal movements follow a circadian pattern and absent during fetal sleep, periods which usually last 20-40 minutes and rarely exceed 90 minutes (Harrington et al; 1998) , (Velazquez et al; 2002).

Fetal movements show diurnal changes. The afternoon and evening periods are periods of peak activity. (Minors et al; 1979).

Page 10: Decreased fetal movements 2017

• Fetal position . Fisher ML 1999.

• Anterior placenta. (Only Prior to 28+0 weeks of gestation …. Neldam et al; 1980)

• Administration of corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity

(Hijazi et al; 2009)

Decreased maternal sensitivity to fetal movement

Ahmad saber
administeration of antenatal corticosteroids are associated with reduced fetal heart beats variability on CTG also>>>>
Ahmad saber
Fetal presentation has no effect on perception of movement.Kean LH, Suwanrath C,Gargari SS, Sahota DS, James DK.Acomparison of fetal behaviour in breech and cephalicpresentations at term.Br J Obstet Gynaecol1999;106:1209–13.
Ahmad saber
without any eviedince of fetal hypoxia during corticosteroid course even it is given to hypoxic feteses
Page 11: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Unlike betamethasone, dexamethasone does not induce a decrease in fetal movements. Dexamethasone might, therefore, be preferred for enhancement of lung maturation in imminent preterm labor. Mushkat et al; 2001

Both betamethasone and dexamethasone induce a profound, transient, suppression of fetal heart rate characteristics and biophysical activities in the preterm fetus. However, the effect of betamethasone is more pronounced. Awareness of these phenomena might prevent unwarranted iatrogenic delivery of preterm fetuses. Rotmensch et al; 1999

Page 12: Decreased fetal movements 2017

In women with Persistent DFM, maternal glucose administration has no effect on perceived fetal movement Michaan et al; 2016

Increased with elevation of glucose concentration in maternal blood . (Zisser et al; 2006)

Increased fetal movements

Page 13: Decreased fetal movements 2017

The most common single cause of stillbirth is IUGR.

11-29% of women presenting with reduced FM carry a small for gestational age (SGA) fetus under the 10th centile (Heazell et al., 2005; Sinha et al., 2007).

Conditions associated with decreased fetal movements

Maternal causes : Maternal anemia & other medical disorders .

Fetal causes: IUD, FGR and oligohydramnios, hydrops fetalis and polyhydramnios CFMF (i.e. neurological, musculo-skeletal) Fetal anaemia or hydrops

(Unterscheider et al., 2009)

30%

Page 14: Decreased fetal movements 2017

If placental insufficiency is a cause of DFM

Did you have time to save your baby!!??

Page 15: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Struggling

Adaptation

Capitulation

Decompensation

Page 16: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Pearl:

55% of cases of still birth are associated with DFM and 30% of IUGRs are associated with DFM

Ahmad saber
Again
Page 17: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Fetal movements and CFMF

Fetuses with major malformations are generally more likely to demonstrate reduced fetal activity. (Christensen et al; 1999)

A lack of vigorous motion may relate to abnormalities of the central nervous system, muscular dysfunction or skeletal abnormalities. (Tveit et al; 2009)

Ahmad saber
especially corpus callosum dysgenesis
Ahmad saber
but cases of neuromuscular dysfunction did not experience fetal movements at all
Page 18: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Assessment of fetal movements

Subjective maternal perception VS Objective assessment by US.

Can we depend only on the US detected movements ?????

Duration of recording is restricted to 20–30 minutes with the mother in a semi-recumbent position but results not correlate strongly to perinatal outcome. (Lowery et al; 1997)

No studies evaluated the use of longer periods of fetal movement counting by ultrasound .

Ahmad saber
what about sleep cycles
Page 19: Decreased fetal movements 2017

When correlated sonographically,

• 50% with isolated limb movements • 80% of movements involving both the trunk

and limb (de Vries et al; 2006).

Mothers perceived 33 to 88 percent of visualized fetal movements by US (Hijazi et al; 2009).

Fetal Movements in a healthy fetus vary from 4 to 100 per hour (Mangesi & Hofmeyr, 2007).

Page 20: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Definition of DFM

Dilemma

Page 21: Decreased fetal movements 2017

No universally agreed definition of RFM. RCOG 2014

Also, level of fetal movement that distinguishes a healthy fetus from a fetus at risk has not been determined (Flenady et al; 2009).

NICE and ACOG guidelines do not provide a definition of reduced fetal movements, which reflects the dilemma and controversy of the definition and management of reduced FM.

Page 22: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Till now the alarm limit of perceived fetal movements is not determined Least number of maternally perceived fetal movements that reflect fetal well-being .

While, sudden decrease in fetal movement should be evaluated as a potential marker of risk (Winje et al; 2012).

Page 23: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Perception of at least • 10 FMs during 12 hours of normal maternal activity.

•10 FMs over two hours when the mother is at rest and focused on counting.

•4 FMs in one hour when the mother is at rest and focused on counting.

•10 FMs within 25 minutes in pregnancies 22 to 36 weeks and 35 minutes in pregnancies 37 or more weeks of gestation.

Adapted from Australian guidelines, four examples of criteria for reassurance of fetal well-being (Kuwata et al; 2008)

Page 24: Decreased fetal movements 2017

To get rid of that dilemmaAdapt the guidelines

Page 25: Decreased fetal movements 2017

A recent prospective cohort study showed that the mean time to perceive 10 movements is approximately 10 minutes in normal 3rd trimester pregnancies (Winje et al., 2011).

If women are unsure of RFM after 28+0 wks, RCOG 2011Patient on left side and focus on fetal movements for 2 hours. If they do not feel 10 or more discrete movements in 2 hours, they should contact their doctor immediately. level C

ACOG 2014perception of 10 distinct movements in a period of up to 2 continuous or interrupted hours is considered reassuring. The only numerical limit that has been derived from a total population, and subsequently evaluated as a screening test in the same population, is the perception of 10 distinct movements during focused counting over a period of two hours, which is reassuring ("count to 10" method) ( Moore et al; 1989).

Page 26: Decreased fetal movements 2017

qualitative vs quantitative!!

There is no evidence that any quantitative limit is more effective than qualitative maternal perception of DFM for identifying pregnancies at risk of adverse outcome.

Page 27: Decreased fetal movements 2017

EVALUATION of a case of DFM

• Rationale• Goal

• Methods  

Page 28: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Rationale :

Fetal heart rate, fetal movements are impacted by uteroplacental blood flow alterations and are thereby sensitive to fetal hypoxemia and acidemia. ACOG 2014

Any diminution in fetal activity requires fetal reevaluation , regardless of the amount of time that has elapsed since the last test. level B ACOG 2014

Fetal movements decrease as the fetus attempts to conserve energy . The loss of fetal movement can be a sign of ongoing central nervous system hypoxia and injury. (Olesen and Svare JA. 2004)

Page 29: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Goals: 1. rule out imminent fetal demise.

2. Assessment for common risk factors, such as fetal growth restriction and decreasing placental function.

Page 30: Decreased fetal movements 2017

1st History taking (FGR, placental insufficiency and congenital malformations).

• Confirm RFM if not present reassure and discharge. If confirmed : comprehensive stillbirth risk evaluation • multiple consultations for RFM, known FGR, • HTN, DM, • extremes of maternal age, • smoking,• placental insufficiency, • CFM, • obesity,• poor past obstetric history (e.g.FGR and stillbirth)• genetic factors.

Page 31: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Clinical approaches described in observational studies include:

1. physical examination including SFH

2. non-stress and contraction stress tests.

3. ultrasound examination (biophysical profile [BPP])

4. umbilical artery Doppler.

5. testing for fetomaternal hemorrhage (eg, Kleihauer-Betke test).

6. Amnioscopy. 

Ahmad saber
The wide range of diagnostic approaches reflects efforts to detect acute fetal distress, subacute and chronic placental insufficiency, and other specific pathologies associated with DFM.
Ahmad saber
contraction stress test not used or recommended now
Page 32: Decreased fetal movements 2017

In one study CTG was the most favored method of assessing fetal wellbeing (93%) followed by the use of • kickcharts (64%). • biophysical score (54%). • liquor volume (52%). • SFH (34%). • umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry (23%) .

(Unterscheider et al., 2010)

Page 33: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Fetal movement counting (count-to-ten kickcharts)

The use of kickcharts is easy, simple and can be done at home.

Page 34: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Using kickcharts were associated with higher intervention rates 32% and caesarean section rates 24% (Sinha et al., 2007).

Routine formal FM counting should not be offered as a fetal well being testing. NICE 2003 renewed in their 2008 guideline.

In contrast, ACOG supports formal movement counting. In their bulletin on antepartum fetal surveillance they instruct the woman to count 10 movements, preferably after a meal, and to write down the hours this takes (ACOG, 2000).

Ahmad saber
as a fetal well being testing
Page 35: Decreased fetal movements 2017

systematic review of 5 trials involving 71,458 women Not enough evidence on counting the baby's movements in the womb to check for wellbeing. (Mangesi et al; 2015) .

Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing

Page 36: Decreased fetal movements 2017
Page 37: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Role of CTG

For how long CTG should be done?

Even without movements if the term fetus does not experience a fetal heart rate acceleration for more than 80 minutes, fetal compromise is likely to be present (Leveno et al; 1983).

The negative predictive value of NST alone for predicting stillbirth within 1 week of a normal test is 99.8%; for BPP, modified BPP, and CST, it is greater than 99.9%. ACOG 2014 

Ahmad saber
CTG monitoring of the fetal heart rate, initially for at least 20 minutes, provides an easilyaccessible means of detecting fetal compromise.The presence of a normal fetal heart ratepattern (i.e. showing accelerations of fetal heart rate coinciding with fetal movements) isindicative of a healthy fetus with a properly functioning autonomic nervous system.
Ahmad saber
The fetal heart rate accelerateswith 92–97% of all gross body movements felt by the mother.63,64
Ahmad saber
The authors acknowledged severallimitations, including limited numbers of women (four trials and 1588 women) and seriousmethodological concerns, such as the fact that the trials were conducted in the early 1980swhen CTG monitoring was just being introduced into routine clinical practice.
Page 38: Decreased fetal movements 2017

There are no randomised controlled trials of ultrasound scan versus no ultrasound scan in women with RFM

US examination in cases complicated by persistent DFM despite a reactive NST is a valuable assessment

tool.• Fetal activity• Fetal growth velocity• Amniotic fluid volume• Fetal anatomic survey (CFMF)• EFW if there is a size-dates discrepancy (Heazell et al;

2005).

Growth restriction has been associated with a decrease in the number, quality, strength, and duration of fetal movements (Bekedam et al;1985 ).

Exclude fetal Growth restriction

Ultrasound examination

Ahmad saber
not surprising
Page 39: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Remember The most 2 important US markers are :

Perfusion

Growth velocity

Page 40: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Biophysical profile (BPP)

A normal BPP score along with a reactive NST is an indication of fetal well-being.  ACOG 2014

A total biophysical score of <4 is abnormal and suggestive of fetal compromise and increased risk of adverse outcome. ACOG 2014

Ahmad saber
A normal BPP score along with a reactive NST is an indication of fetal well-being. The BPP provides 2 points each for fetal breathing, movement, and fetal tone in 30 minutes and 2 points for normal amniotic fluid volume. There has been debate regarding the ultrasound definition of oligohydramnios and whether a single deepest vertical pocket of fluid of ≤2 cm, as recommended in the Practice Bulletin, is more acceptable as a predictor than an amniotic fluid index (AFI) of <5 cm.
Page 41: Decreased fetal movements 2017

RCTs does not support the use of BPP as a test of fetal wellbeing .

There was no significant difference between the groups in perinatal deaths. (Cochrane review Lalor et al.,2008)

Page 42: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Useful only if IUGR is diagnosed. A study of 599 cases of DFM evaluated by nonstress testing found no additional benefit of Doppler assessment ( Dubiel et al;1997).

Doppler demonstrated a pathological pattern in 1 % of the 1151 cases. Most of these abnormalities were associated with growth restricted fetuses.

In 940 cases ; after exclusion of cases of non reactive CTG and IUGR Doppler velocimetry was abnormal

Only in 1 Case. Norwegian Perinatal Society Conference, November 2006

Doppler velocimetry  

Page 43: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Baschat 2010

Page 44: Decreased fetal movements 2017
Page 45: Decreased fetal movements 2017

ACOG support the use of UA Doppler assessments only in the management of suspected IUGR, instructing that decisions regarding the timing of delivery should be based on UA Doppler results in combination with other tests of fetal well-being . 

No evidence that inclusion of umbilical artery Doppler in antenatal surveillance provides additional benefit in the assessment of a normally growing fetus. ACOG 2014

Page 46: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Abnormal elevation of Doppler indices precedes loss of fetal heart rate variability and reactivity, eventually leading to decline and loss of fetal breathing and body movements (Williams et al; 2003).

Page 47: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Testing for feto-maternal transfusion

Kleihauer-Betke stain or flow cytometry

pregnant patient who presents with DFM +• sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern or• unexplained fetal tachycardia or• Fetal hydrops on ultrasound associated with

elevated middle cerebral artery Doppler velocity.

Page 48: Decreased fetal movements 2017

A large fetomaternal transfusion (FMT) is estimated to occur in 0.3 % of pregnancies, and is a significant contributor to stillbirth. (Sebring et al;1990)

Page 49: Decreased fetal movements 2017

FOLLOW-UP AND DELIVERY

There are no studies to determine whether intervention (e.g. delivery or further investigation) alters perinatal morbidity or mortality in women presenting with recurrent or persistent RFM remote from term .

No randomized trials have evaluated any aspect of the management of DFM. (Frøen et al; 2005)

Ahmad saber
Therefore, the decision whether or not to induce labour at term in a woman who presents recurrently with RFM when the growth, liquor volume and CTG appear normal must be made after careful consultant-led counseling of the pros and cons of induction on an individualized basis. Evidence level 2
Page 50: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Abnormal findings :• Non-reactive non-stress test• low biophysical profile score• fetal growth restriction

managed according to usual clinical standards

Page 51: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Persistent DFM and normal evaluation

 

There are no studies evaluating the optimal frequency and method of follow-up of pregnancies complicated by persistent DFM in which the antepartum evaluations are all normal. 

no data from randomized trials to guide practice recommendations for management of DFM (Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 ).

Page 52: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Adapted recommendations of managing a woman reported decreased perception of fetal movements from Stillbirth Foundation , The Perinatal Society Of Australia and New Zealand and the

international stillbirth Alliance

Page 53: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Management of patients with persistently decreased fetal movement depends on:

1. gestational age 2. presence of other identifiable risk factors for

stillbirth.

If no cause for decreased fetal movement is determined, we suggest pregnancies under 37 weeks of gestation be monitored with nonstress testing and ultrasound examination twice weekly.

After 37 wks >> labor induction of these pregnancies when the cervix is favorable ( Grade 2C ).

Page 54: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Reduced fetal movements in multiple gestations

The same but focus in

Evaluation of chorionicity,

no structural abnormalities, signs of selective IUGR or twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS),

Serial sonographic assessment for multiple gestations, more frequently in monochorionic gestations, is recommended.

Page 55: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Postdates

UA Doppler would not be expected to be helpful since elevated fetal risk in postdates pregnancy is related to impaired placental gas exchange rather than impaired blood flow

Amniotic fluid assessment should be added in postdates pregnancies.

Page 56: Decreased fetal movements 2017

•Every mother who presents with the concern of reduced or altered fetal movements should. be taken seriously .

•The initial assessment should include a detailed history +DVP + AC to rule out IUGR + CTG. ( if all normal discharge !!!!)

Summary and recommendation

Kickcharts are of no value and should therefore not be given out to pregnant women.

UA Doppler velocimetry and vibroacoustic stimulation are of limited use in the assessment of reduced FM.

BPP scoring has not been shown to be of benefit.

Page 57: Decreased fetal movements 2017
Page 58: Decreased fetal movements 2017

NST alone for predicting stillbirth within 1 week of a normal test is 99.8%; for BPP, modified BPP, and CST, it is greater than 99.9%.

 

Page 59: Decreased fetal movements 2017
Page 60: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Thank you

Page 61: Decreased fetal movements 2017

Women with high risk factors for stillbirth should undergo antepartum fetal surveillance using NST, modified BPP. ACOG 2014 level B

Page 62: Decreased fetal movements 2017