Decision Lens & PM-DIS TxDOT TPP …...Project 1 Project 2 Project 3..... Most Beneficial Least...
Transcript of Decision Lens & PM-DIS TxDOT TPP …...Project 1 Project 2 Project 3..... Most Beneficial Least...
1
Decision Lens & PM-DISTxDOT TPP Implementation Overview
June 2018
2
AgendaTopic
Welcome Introductions and Background
TxDOT Opportunity for Strategic Prioritization,Access to Data and Predictive Performance
Understanding TxDOT Criteria – Developing a Performance-based Prioritization Framework
Understanding PM-DIS
Decision Lens Demonstration
Q&A
2
3
Introductions
3
PartnerHigh Street Consulting
Kevin Ford, PhD
Systems ArchitectAlliance Transportation Group
Ben Lauritzen
Solution AnalystDecision Lens
Marco Triqueros, PE
4
Project Background
5
Project Background
5
• Created to Fulfill New Federal and State Prioritization
• Began with Uploading Spreadsheets
• TxDOT Requested a System to Create a More Efficient Prioritization Method
• TxDOT Worked with Consultants to Outline Department Needs
• Arrived at a Fully Automated Project Prioritization Tool
6
6
TxDOT Opportunity
Strategic Prioritization Lack of uniform process for project selection for
UTP, STIP, TIP, etc. Lack of justification and transparency in project
selection Access to Data Districts and MPOs did not have uniformed
access to project data Request for project data was timely
Predictive Performance Project and portfolio performance was estimated
by SMEs and not consistent
7
Developing a Performance-based Prioritization FrameworkKevin Ford, Ph.D.High Street Consulting Group
7
8
Identify Goals & Objectives
Assign Scoring Criteria
Quantify Project Impacts
Establish Priorities
Evaluate Investment Strategies
What are we trying to achieve?
How do we define
progress?
Which projects drive
performance?
Why should we consider funding one project over another?
Where should our limited
resources go?
Prioritization Framework
9
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Identify Goals & Objectives
Improve Safety
Preserve the System
Reduce Congestion
Enhance Connectivity
Grow the Economy
Protect the Environment
10
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Identify Comprehensive
Evaluation Criteria
Improve Safety
Reduction in the Number and Rate of Fatal & Serious Injury Crashes
Reduction in the Number and Rate of All Crashes
Societal Cost Savings
Implement a Safety Related Project
Improves an Evacuation Route
Save Lives
Reduce Crash Likelihood
Enhance General Safety
Improve Critical Routes
Most Beneficial Projects are those that …
Assign Scoring Criteria
11
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Preserve the System
Reduction in the Structurally Deficient Bridge Deck Area
Deck Area Receiving Preventive Maintenance
Reduction in Poor Lane Miles by Ride & Distress Scores
Lane Miles Receiving Preventive Maintenance
Mitigate risk
Correct deficiencies
Reduce life-cycle costs
Most Beneficial Projects are those that …
Identify Comprehensive
Evaluation Criteria
Assign Scoring Criteria
12
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Identify Comprehensive
Evaluation Criteria
Reduce Congestion
Connects Transportation Options
and Communities
Most Beneficial Projects are those that …
Assign Scoring Criteria
Reduce Congestion (MPO)
Truck & Non-Truck Congested VMT Reduction
Truck & Non-Truck Congested VMT Reduction per Lane
Improve an Intermodal Connector
Add Lane-Miles of New Connectivity
13
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Identify Comprehensive
Evaluation Criteria
Increases Travel Time Reliability
Improves Accessibility
Connects Transportation Options
and Communities
Most Beneficial Projects are those that …
Assign Scoring Criteria
Enhance Connectivity (Non-MPO)
Affects Access and Reliability
Trunk System Route
Intermodal Connector
Lane-Miles of New Connectivity
14
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Identify Comprehensive
Evaluation Criteria
Stimulate Regional and National
Economies
Equitable Allocation of Benefits
Most Beneficial Projects are those that …
Assign Scoring CriteriaGrow the Economy
Improvement to the National Highway System or Freight Network
Average Daily Traffic Experiencingan Improvement
Percent Trucks in Project Limits
Improve an Energy Sector Route
15
Improve Safety31%
Preserve the System21%
Reduce Congestion19%
Enhance Connectivity
14%
Grow the Economy10%
Protect the Environment
5%
Identify Comprehensive
Evaluation Criteria
Improve Air and Water Quality
Mitigate Erosion
Enhance Livability
Most Beneficial Projects are those that …
Assign Scoring CriteriaProtect the Environment
Implement an Environmental-Related Project
16
Leverage Data to Inform Decisions
Mobility
Safety
Structures
Roadway
Understand Underlying Performance Data
at Location
Forecast Performance With and Without Funding Project
Identify Project Location
Project Location
Quantify Project Impacts
PM-DIS
Powered by:
17
Improve Safety
7.9 points out of 31
Preserve the System
2 points out of 21
Reduce Congestion10 points out of 19
Enhance Connectivity4 points out
of 14
Grow the Economy0 points out of 10
Protect the Environment
3.5 points out of 5
Project Score
Project 1Project 2Project 3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Most Beneficial
Least Beneficial
Project 1Reconstruct Interchange with Grade Separation
7.9 + 2 + 10 + 4 + 0 + 3.5 = 27.4
Overall Project Score
Benefit Rank #1 out of 655
Establish PrioritiesCollaboratively-Establish Goal Weighting
Powered by:
18
Communicate Policy Implications
What if
Incorporates financial and operational constraints
Enables exploratory analysis
Communicates impact on outcomes
Allows for process refinement
Approach
Powered by:
Evaluate Investment Strategies
19
PM-DISPerformance Metrics – Data Integration System
MAKING LIVES BETTER
20
WHAT IS PM-DIS?
1. Helps Meet Federal Guidelines
2. Provides Reliable Project Scores
3. Reduces Manual Input to Nearly Zero
4. Integrates Legacy Systems
5. Provides a Springboard for TxDOT’s Data Future
20
21
LEVERAGESYOUR DATA FROM FIVE LEGACY SYSTEMS
21
PONTEX/BMIS/InspectTech
PMIS/Pavement Analyst
CRIS RHINO DCIS
22
WHAT IS PIM-DS?
22
23
PULLS DATA INTO A SINGLE SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS
23
Generates a Set of Performance Ratings, Project Categories, and Costs
PMIS/Pavement Analyst
CRIS
RHINO
DCIS
PONTEX/BMIS/InspectTech
Preservation
Safety
Congestion
Connectivity
Economics
Environment
PM-DIS
PM-DIS Pulls Data into a Single System for Analysis
24
HELPSYOU FIND THE PROJECTSYOU NEED
24
25
GIVESYOU ACCESS TO ALLYOUR PROJECT DATA INONE PLACE
25
26
EXPORTS / IMPORTS ALLYOUR PROJECT DATA WITHONE CLICK
26
27
INTEGRATES WITH TXDOT MAPPING TOOLS
27
28
WITH ONE CLICK, PM-DIS SENDSYOUR PROCESSEDAND SCORED DATA TO DECISION LENS FOR DISPLAY
28
29
PM-DISMaking Data Smarter
30
AUSTIN | HOUSTON | DALLAS | LAKE CHARLES
THANKYOU!
MAKING LIVES BETTER
Ben LauritzenSystems Architect
31
Decision Lens Demonstration
32
Current Challenges Transportation Agencies Face
Multiple Perspectives clash in this model
1. Breakdown between Fed and State
2. Breakdown between State and MPOs
Federal mandates for measures and
performance reporting
States have their own performance goals
that don’t line up with federal requirements
MPOs have subjective measures that don’t line up with States requirements for
Federal $$$
33
Asset Management Systems Continue to Perpetuate Siloed Information
Transportation is moving away from this siloedapproach…
34
34
Cutting-edge software implemented by leading transportation experts to enable performance-based planning and programming
Bridge
Pavement
Safety
Mobility
Leverage Data Score Projects based on Expected Impact Develop Investment Strategies
Environment
Economic
35
Thank You