Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling
Transcript of Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling
-
7/29/2019 Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling
1/4
602 Reviews of books
and other information, we learn of rituals and of practices of Mexico Citys crypto-
Jews, of those in other Jewish sources (syncretic ones forged in seventeenth-century
Catholic Spain, detailing inversions of Jewish or Catholic rituals), and of the cultural
absorption of Christian stereotypes of Jews.
This eclectic collection of autobiographies is not intended, nor should it be taken,
as demonstrative of true accounts of lives sullied by the Inquisition. Rather thenarratives show the understanding of the power of the word on the part of some of
those called before the Holy Office. Stories were adjusted and adapted, tones were
adopted as the prisoners grappled with confronting undefined charges deriving from
the testimony of unknown witnesses. By looking at such autobiographies (whose
veracity cannot be determined) through a kind of parallax of history, one gains a
slightly different view of a closely studied topic and is able to discern another piece
to place in the mosaic of the story of the past. In addition, the editors of this volume
have performed a useful service for anyone interested in the Inquisitions activities;
most especially for those who would like to look into various episodes recorded inthe files of the accused who appeared before inquisitorial tribunals in the Iberian
Peninsula and in the New World in the early modern period. We hope that Richard
Kagan and Abigail Dyer will continue to provide us with translations of additional
trials so as to enhance the information available for research into the Inquisition and
its history. They should be encouraged to persist in this endeavour with the same
enthusiasm and diligence as they have shown in this book.
Bar-Ilan University MoissOrfali
XXXsecondary reviewReviews of booksReviews of booksREVIEWS OF BOOKS
Richard Kuhns, Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling: Author as Midwifeand Pimp. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005. xxiii + 177pp. $40.00.ISBN 0 231 13608 0. Simone Marchesi, Stratigrafie decameroniane. Firenze:Olschki, 2004. xxii + 154. $19.00. ISBN 88 222 5403 1.
BoccacciosDecameroncontinues to command (and repay) considerable critical interest
even in the seventh century of its reception, and these two recent studies make new
and important contributions to the field. Both studies are essentially concerned with
Boccaccios place in literary culture: Richard Kuhns contextualizes the Decameronwithin the broader cultural milieu, while Simone Marchesi delves into the text and
its intertexts in order to map Boccaccios allusive mechanisms.
Kuhnss characterization of Boccaccio as pimp is derived from the subtitle to
the text: il libro chiamato Decameron, cognominato Prencipe Galeotto (the book
called Decameron, otherwise known as Prince Galehalt). In the romance tradition,
Galeotto was the knight who acted as go-between for Lancelot and Guinevere in their
illicit love affair, and Kuhns suggests that the subtitle should be read as Prince of
Pimps, referring both to the book itself, as provider of explicitly sexual material, and
to the author, who draws the reader into a sexual relationship with his book. Theauthorial pose of the author as pimp is shown to be a literary tradition that extends
back through Ovid to the character of Socrates in Platos dialogues (who is also the
-
7/29/2019 Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling
2/4
Reviews of books 603
BoccacciosDecameronis situated in the wider comparative context of world narrative
traditions. The introductory chapter is particularly useful in this regard, relating the
Western literary tradition to mythic storytelling and the development of individual
consciousness through narrative. Chapter 1 argues for the importance of visual cul-
ture as inspiration for Boccaccios storytelling methods, as evidenced by the presence
of painters in the text, and Boccaccios co-option of painterly illusionistic techniques.Chapter 2 broadens the discussion beyond Boccaccios storyworld, considering the
function of dreams and masking in storytelling, and re-presenting Boccaccios well-
known narrative personae as masked performative ritual. Chapter 3 considers the
metamorphoses of the body within theDecameron, with original readings of IV, 1 and
VIII, 7; storytelling is shown to metaphorize the sexual body, and likewise, sexual
actions metaphorize storytelling. Chapter 4 concentrates on a detailed reading of VII,
9, concluding that by his inversion of narrational and religious traditions, Boccaccio
reveals the latent content of his work, which is to scrutinize the nature of narrative
(and religious) truth itself. Chapter 5 considers the text as a total work of art, whichencompasses painting, music, dance and poetry in addition to storytelling, while
the final chapter returns to the philosophical implications of truth in storytelling,
presenting Boccaccios text in psychoanalytic terms as a transitional object, used to
relate fiction to reality.
Kuhns is not an Italianist by formation, but rather a philosopher of literature, and
there are necessarily many gaps in his knowledge of Boccaccio (most notably in his
knowledge of recent critical literature). His contention that the Decameron is a
straightforwardly pro-feminist text is perhaps a little simplistic, given recent feminist
readings (for example, Migiel). Nonetheless, both the specialist and general reader
alike will find much of interest here. At its best, this book refracts Boccaccios text
through the lens of performative and material culture, and forces the reader to
reassess it in a new light.
Simone Marchesis Stratigrafie decameronianeis concerned with the study of Boccaccios
intertextual strategies, and is directed clearly towards the Boccaccio specialist,
rather than the general reader. It is surely no accident that the organization of the
book mimics Boccaccios own structuring principles in theDecameron, with a proemial
preface, introduction, four chapters, and an authorial conclusion. The preface and
introduction set out the fundamental premises of this study: that the Decameron, like
Dantes Commediabefore it, is a text which operates on multiple levels; it is the readersrole to tease out the meanings which lie below the surface. This layered ordering of
meaning is analogous to Marchesis governing metaphor for Boccaccios intertextual
reference: the stratigrafie of the title. Marchesi suggests a three-dimensional model
of allusion, where Boccaccios literary sources are arranged one above another, each
corresponding to a different literary culture. By focusing not only on the philological
relations between texts, but also on the receptive role of the contemporary reader (or
auditor), Marchesi is able to show that Boccaccios text is targeted at and compre-
hensible by different reading communities, all of whom are able to construct their
own meanings depending on their own literary culture. In Chapter 1, Marchesisuggests that a previously-unrecognized allusion to Aristotles Rhetoricain the Proemio
is the key to unlocking Boccaccios generic definition of his text and that Quintilian
-
7/29/2019 Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling
3/4
604 Reviews of books
develops this idea, contending that the authors self-defence in the Introduction to
Day IV is in fact an invitation to intertextual reflection. Tracing an allusion from
Dante through to Horaces first satire, he shows the close links between theDecameron
and Horace, not only in terms of textual allusion, but also in the deep structuring
principles of the text. Chapter 3 traces the similarities between Virgils Dido and
the character of Lisabetta (IV, 5); the links are shown through intertextual allusionnot only to the Aeneidbut also to subsequent retellings of the Dido myth in classical
and vernacular literature, such as early Dante commentaries. The final chapter
demonstrates the importance of the Calandrino cycle of tales to the meta-narrative,
by analysing a cluster of related allusions (classical, bibical, and patristic) that create
an intertextual dialogue about the nature of the narrative experience itself. In the
conclusion, Marchesi rejects narrowly philological or semiological approaches, and
argues instead for a third way of responding to the text based on Jausss
Rezeptionsthetik. In order to understand Boccaccios referential practices, we must
instead focus on the relationship between the author, his first readers, and theirhorizons of expectation. In conclusion, Marchesis book makes a very valuable
contribution to the analysis of Boccaccios intertextual practice, not least because of
his skilful incorporation of the manuscript paratext into the philological field. His
sensitivity to narrative structures and echoes is notable, and this book deserves to be
widely read.
University of Cardiff GuydaArmstrong
XXXsecondary reviewReviews of booksReviews of booksREVIEWS OF BOOKS
Ivo Biagianti, Storie di Famiglia. Nobili, capitani, dottori nei Ricordi della famigliaDe Giudici di Arezzo (14931769)(Fonti e Studi di Storia Aretina, II). Florence:Casa Ed. Leo S. Olschki, 2004. 207pp. $21.00. ISBN 88 222 54147.
In many respects, Arezzos De Giudici family embodied the spirit and experience of
the early modern service nobility, at least insofar as the term is applicable to Italian
society. They attained a measure of local prominence in the later fourteenth century,
but owed their rapid rise in the early modern period to the services they rendered to
various potentates, both in Italy and farther afield. Arezzos ancient enmity with
Florence did not prevent the opportunistic De Giudici from establishing a particu-larly close relationship with the Medici rulers of Tuscany, under whose tutelage the
familys fortunes bloomed. The steady growth of De Giudici territorial possessions
during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries inevitably led to patrimonial divisions
around which distinct family branches grew up, though the family never surrendered
its sense of solidarity or lost sight of its collective goals. Unabashed social climbers,
the De Giudici first applied themselves to the pursuit of advantageous marriages;
then became a family into which others aspired to marry. As naval commanders and
captains of war, jurists and judges, administrators and counsellors, priests and
abbesses, they increased their wealth and prestige through ministration to the greatuntil they numbered themselves among the premiere Tuscan families of the early
modern period Ivo Biagiantis Storie di Famiglia Nobili capitani dottori nei Ricordi della
-
7/29/2019 Decameron and the Philosophy of Storytelling
4/4