Decadal and Centennial ENSO Variability: MTM-SVD · 2013. 3. 26. · Decadal and Centennial ENSO...

1
Decadal and Centennial ENSO Variability: MTM-SVD Samantha Stevenson 1 , Baylor Fox-Kemper 1 , and Markus Jochum 2 1 ATOC/CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO; [email protected] 2 National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder CO Periods of Interest We have chosen two representative 50-year intervals in the 700-year CCSM3.5 run analyzed: P_HI and P_LO, so named for their NINO3 variances. Dynamics are vastly different in P_HI and P_LO! Years σ NINO3 (C 2 ) Δz th (m) Mean z th (m) u (m/s) σ u (m 2 /s 2 ) 1-49 0.721 79.89 90.08 -15.39 0.727 P LO 350-399 0.534 91.58 95.82 -14.64 0.517 400-449 0.685 91.38 96.39 -14.87 0.514 P HI 600-649 1.041 93.36 97.51 -14.86 0.528 650-699 0.777 95.26 98.45 -14.69 0.623 ! " # $ %& %! %" %# %$ & &’% &’! &’( &’" &’) &’# &’* &’$ +,- /01 20345 %!( 361789 : +; +0<=> ,1=<?708=> -=17=8<4 @AB :41703 @C4=15B ! " # $ %& %! %" %# %$ & &’% &’! &’( &’" &’) &’# &’* &’$ &’+ ,-./01 34-5.67 8095: ;.59</0=5: >5./5=9- 3?7 8;> @0. A01-6 %!( 1B./=C , DE Using MTM-SVD to Compare: P_LO vs. P_HI The application of the MTM-SVD decomposition method to data from a preliminary CCSM3.5 run has already yielded a great deal of information on the behavior of ENSO within the model. By comparing two 50-year segments of the run, it is possible to gain information on how precisely ENSO dynamics may differ within a single model, in the absence of other variations in the mean state. Maps of MTM-SVD modes during P_HI and P_LO at various frequencies show that ENSO-like modes of variability appear and disappear as the period of oscillation changes. P_LO: Westward wave propagation is clearly visible in the first MTM-SVD mode (marked “delayed oscillator-like” in Figure 1), while at other times wave propagation is nearly absent. During times marked “recharge/discharge-like”, zonal wind variability is dominated by basin-wide anomalies, which we hypothesize to lead to discharge of water from the equatorial Pacific via Sverdrup transport. The transition from a wave-dominated oscillation to a wind-dominated oscillation in the first MTM-SVD mode occurs at different periods in P_LO vs. P_HI. In P_LO, the transition happens first at roughly 3 years, then wave activity resumes at 5 year periods. In P_HI, the dynamics appear much different: “delayed oscillator-like” variability persists until periods of 6 years, then disappear in favor of variability dominated by basin-wide wind anomalies. We theorize that the marked difference in NINO3 variance in P_LO vs. P_HI, despite similarities in mean state between the two time periods, is a result of differences in interaction between distinct dynamical modes. Some modes are likely to resemble the “delayed oscillator”, while others do not; these may be acting as “recharge/ discharge” oscillators, or perhaps other dynamics come into play. Further work is necessary to diagnose the precise dynamical mechanisms at work throughout the model run. The new parameterization for atmospheric convection has greatly improved the representation of ENSO in the CCSM, but exactly what dynamical changes have resulted remains unclear. In an effort to diagnose these changes, the multitaper method/singular value decomposition (MTM-SVD; Lees & Park, 1995) method has been applied to our model run. The periods of interest are 50 years in length, and have been selected because they differ in mean state only in terms of the NINO3 variance present; making “P_LO” and “P_HI” excellent test cases for the effects of dynamical changes on ENSO behavior. The MTM-SVD method has proved effective at diagnosing ENSO in the past (Mann and Lees, 1996), and appears quite helpful in this case as well. We see marked changes in the distribution of variance with frequency in P_HI vs. P_LO, as well as dynamical effects which may represent changes in the importance of delayed- oscillator type wave dynamics relative to recharge and discharge of heat from the equatorial Pacific. Local fractional variance (LFV) for P_LO (left) and P_HI (right), including the first three modes of the MTM-SVD. MTM-SVD decomposition during P_HI at an oscillation period of 2.94 years, in SST (top panels), thermocline depth (middle panels) and zonal wind (bottom panels). Four arbitrary phases are chosen for each, to illustrate the behavior of the oscillation in all fields. !! !" !# !$ % $ # " ! !" !# !$ % $ # " &’()*+,-./ &1&2" 334 &’()*+,-./ 5 #% &1&2"65#%78*9. ’(:,; <’( =>2*; 7.(,’/#?@!$A B.*(9 P_LO: Maximum NINO3 amplitude MTM-SVD maps for the dominant mode of variability, at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. ENSO-like variability in SST is apparent at 2.94 and 6.25 years, but at 3.84 an additional mode is present, possibly representing a recharge/discharge-like oscillation. !!"# !! !$"# $ $"# ! !"# !! !$"% !$"& !$"’ !$"( $ $"( $"’ $"& $"% ! )*+,-./012 )4)56 778 )*+,-./012 9 ($ )4)56:9($;<-=1 *+>/? @*+ AB5-? ;1+/*26"%’&# C1-+=D ,*21! P_HI: Maximum NINO3 amplitude MTM-SVD maps for the dominant mode of variability, at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. ENSO-like patterns in SST are visible, along with wave propagation in thermocline depth, for all periods less than 6 years. At this point, the dynamics appear to shift to a mode more governed by wind activity. !!"# !! !$"# !$ !%"# % %"# $ $"# ! !"# !! !$"# !$ !%"# % %"# $ $"# ! &’()*+,-./ &1&23 445 &’()*+,-./ 6 !% &1&2376!%89*:. ’(;,< =’( >?2*< 8.(,’/@"!#%@ A.*(:B )’/.$ P_LO: Z20 (mean themocline depth in the eastern Pacific (5S-5N, 130E-80W) vs. NINO3 SST, following Kessler (2002). Plots shown for the dominant MTM-SVD mode (top) and second mode (bottom), at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. Arrows indicate direction of increasing phase. !! !" !# !$ % $ # " ! !#&’ !# !$&’ !$ !%&’ % %&’ $ $&’ # #&’ ()*+,-./01 (3(4" 556 ()*+,-./01 7 #% (3(4"87#%9:,;0 )*<.= >)* ?@3 ,= 90*.)1#&A!$’ B0,*; !! !" !# !$ % $ # " ! !" !# !$ % $ # " &’()*+,-./ &1&2" 334 &’()*+,-./ 5 #% &1&2"65#%78*9. ’(:,; <’( =>1 *; 7.(,’/"?@!AB C.*(9 !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$ !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$ ’()*+,-./0 ’2’34 556 ’()*+,-./0 7 &! ’2’3487&!9:+;/ ()<-= >() ?@2 += 9/)-(0$"&A!$ B/+); P_HI: Z20 (mean themocline depth in the eastern Pacific (5S-5N, 130E-80W) vs. NINO3 SST, following Kessler (2002). Plots shown for the dominant MTM-SVD mode (top) and second mode (bottom), at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. Arrows indicate direction of increasing phase. !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& !!"’ ! !"’ !"& !"% !"$ !"# !!"&# !!"& !!"’# !!"’ !!"!# ! !"!# !"’ !"’# !"& !"&# ()*+,-./01 (3(4% 556 ()*+,-./01 7 &! (3(4%87&!9:,;0 )*<.= >)* ?@4,= 90*.)1&"A$’# B0,*;C +)10& !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$ !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$ !"# ’()*+,-./0 ’2’34 556 ’()*+,-./0 7 &! ’2’3487&!9:+;/ ()<-= >() ?@3+= 9/)-(04"#%$A B/+);C *(0/& !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$ !!"& !!"’( !!"’ !!"!( ! !"!( !"’ !"’( !"& )*+,-./012 )4)56 778 )*+,-./012 9 &! )4)56:9&!;<-=1 *+>/? @*+ AB5-? ;1+/*2$"&(!$ C1-+=D ,*21& !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& !!"’ ! !"’ !"& !"% !"$ !"# !!"( !!") !!"$ !!"& ! !"& !"$ !") *+,-./0123 *5*6% 778 *+,-./0123 9 &! *5*6%:9&!;<.=2 +,>0? @+, AB5 .? ;2,0+3%"($)# C2.,=D -+32& Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 1: Delayed oscillator-like? Mode 1: Recharge/discharge-like? Mode 1: Delayed oscillator-like? Mode 1: Recharge/discharge -like? Example MTM-SVD Fields !!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$ !!"& !!"’( !!"’ !!"!( ! !"!( !"’ !"’( !"& )*+,-./012 )4)56 778 )*+,-./012 9 &! )4)56:9&!;<-=1 *+>/? @*+ AB5-? ;1+/*2$"&(!$ C1-+=D ,*21& !!"# !!"$% !!"$ !!"!% ! !"!% !"$ !"$% !!"#% !!"# !!"$% !!"$ !!"!% ! !"!% !"$ !"$% !"# !"#% &’()*+,-./ &1&23 445 &’()*+,-./ 6 #! &1&2376#!89*:. ’(;,< =’( >?1 *< 8.(,’/#"@A$% B.*(:C )’/.#

Transcript of Decadal and Centennial ENSO Variability: MTM-SVD · 2013. 3. 26. · Decadal and Centennial ENSO...

Page 1: Decadal and Centennial ENSO Variability: MTM-SVD · 2013. 3. 26. · Decadal and Centennial ENSO Variability: MTM-SVD Samantha Stevenson1, Baylor Fox-Kemper1, and Markus Jochum2 1ATOC/CIRES,

Decadal and Centennial ENSO Variability: MTM-SVDSamantha Stevenson1, Baylor Fox-Kemper1, and Markus Jochum2

1ATOC/CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO; [email protected] Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder CO

Periods of InterestWe have chosen two representative 50-year intervals in the 700-year CCSM3.5 run analyzed: P_HI and P_LO, so named for their NINO3 variances. Dynamics are vastly different in P_HI and P_LO!

3 Understanding ENSO in the Holocene

3.1 Intrinsic ENSO Centennial Variability in a 700yr Trial Run

A preliminary 700 year CCSM run forms the dataset for our “control” simulation; although shorterthan the millennial simulations we propose to conduct, this simulation is nevertheless long enoughto show interesting dynamical changes. Even though there is no external forcing variability, mul-tidecadal variations are ubiquitous in this CCSM3.5 simulation and inextricably linked with varia-tions in mechanisms connecting SST, zonal wind and thermocline depth.

Table 1 characterizes the mean state of the ocean, presented at 50-year intervals throughout themodel run. Of particular importance are the variances in NINO3 index (σNINO3) and in the meanzonal wind (σu). The former is used to distinguish between periods of strong/weak El Nino events,while the latter provides a rough idea of the magnitude of stochastic wind forcing.

We identify two periods of interest from this table, which illustrate the range of ENSO dynamicsin the model; these are model years 350-399 (P LO; low NINO3 variance) and 600-649 (P HI;high NINO3 variance). Note that the mean winds, wind variance, mean thermocline tilt, and meanthermocline depth differ very little between P LO and P HI, yet the NINO3 variance differs bynearly a factor of 2. Most proxy records are thought to detect quantities like ∆zth,zth, and u withunknown degrees of ‘noise’ from σNINO3 and σu.†

Table 1: Characterization of the state of the tropical Pacific in a 700-year integration of CCSM3.5,analyzed at 50-year intervals. Most proxy records are thought to sense quantities like ∆zth,zth,uwith unknown degrees of ‘noise’ from σNINO3 and σu.

Years σNINO3 (C2) ∆zth (m) Mean zth (m) u (m/s) σu (m2/s2)1-49 0.721 79.89 90.08 -15.39 0.727

50-99 0.554 83.10 93.50 -15.51 0.741100-149 0.635 85.20 94.08 -15.53 0.666150-199 0.674 86.09 95.00 -15.06 0.606200-249 0.690 86.31 95.04 -14.85 0.595250-299 0.589 88.73 94.98 -14.80 0.539300-349 0.641 88.67 94.84 -14.83 0.585

P LO 350-399 0.534 91.58 95.82 -14.64 0.517400-449 0.685 91.38 96.39 -14.87 0.514450-499 0.927 92.05 96.40 -14.89 0.574500-549 0.923 92.50 96.28 -14.52 0.512550-599 0.911 94.12 97.31 -14.77 0.619

P HI 600-649 1.041 93.36 97.51 -14.86 0.528650-699 0.777 95.26 98.45 -14.69 0.623

†The mean state of the model in this preliminary run has some remaining trends. In particular, the meridionaloverturning circulation weakens and the mean thermocline depth continues deepening in Table 1. However, this isonly a preliminary simulation: other versions of the CCSM and the higher-resolution version of CCSM3.5 have beensuccessfully run for thousand-year timescales without such issues and full spin-up of the production model is assured.

C–5

3 Understanding ENSO in the Holocene

3.1 Intrinsic ENSO Centennial Variability in a 700yr Trial Run

A preliminary 700 year CCSM run forms the dataset for our “control” simulation; although shorterthan the millennial simulations we propose to conduct, this simulation is nevertheless long enoughto show interesting dynamical changes. Even though there is no external forcing variability, mul-tidecadal variations are ubiquitous in this CCSM3.5 simulation and inextricably linked with varia-tions in mechanisms connecting SST, zonal wind and thermocline depth.

Table 1 characterizes the mean state of the ocean, presented at 50-year intervals throughout themodel run. Of particular importance are the variances in NINO3 index (σNINO3) and in the meanzonal wind (σu). The former is used to distinguish between periods of strong/weak El Nino events,while the latter provides a rough idea of the magnitude of stochastic wind forcing.

We identify two periods of interest from this table, which illustrate the range of ENSO dynamicsin the model; these are model years 350-399 (P LO; low NINO3 variance) and 600-649 (P HI;high NINO3 variance). Note that the mean winds, wind variance, mean thermocline tilt, and meanthermocline depth differ very little between P LO and P HI, yet the NINO3 variance differs bynearly a factor of 2. Most proxy records are thought to detect quantities like ∆zth,zth, and u withunknown degrees of ‘noise’ from σNINO3 and σu.†

Table 1: Characterization of the state of the tropical Pacific in a 700-year integration of CCSM3.5,analyzed at 50-year intervals. Most proxy records are thought to sense quantities like ∆zth,zth,uwith unknown degrees of ‘noise’ from σNINO3 and σu.

Years σNINO3 (C2) ∆zth (m) Mean zth (m) u (m/s) σu (m2/s2)1-49 0.721 79.89 90.08 -15.39 0.727

50-99 0.554 83.10 93.50 -15.51 0.741100-149 0.635 85.20 94.08 -15.53 0.666150-199 0.674 86.09 95.00 -15.06 0.606200-249 0.690 86.31 95.04 -14.85 0.595250-299 0.589 88.73 94.98 -14.80 0.539300-349 0.641 88.67 94.84 -14.83 0.585

P LO 350-399 0.534 91.58 95.82 -14.64 0.517400-449 0.685 91.38 96.39 -14.87 0.514450-499 0.927 92.05 96.40 -14.89 0.574500-549 0.923 92.50 96.28 -14.52 0.512550-599 0.911 94.12 97.31 -14.77 0.619

P HI 600-649 1.041 93.36 97.51 -14.86 0.528650-699 0.777 95.26 98.45 -14.69 0.623

†The mean state of the model in this preliminary run has some remaining trends. In particular, the meridionaloverturning circulation weakens and the mean thermocline depth continues deepening in Table 1. However, this isonly a preliminary simulation: other versions of the CCSM and the higher-resolution version of CCSM3.5 have beensuccessfully run for thousand-year timescales without such issues and full spin-up of the production model is assured.

C–5

3 Understanding ENSO in the Holocene

3.1 Intrinsic ENSO Centennial Variability in a 700yr Trial Run

A preliminary 700 year CCSM run forms the dataset for our “control” simulation; although shorterthan the millennial simulations we propose to conduct, this simulation is nevertheless long enoughto show interesting dynamical changes. Even though there is no external forcing variability, mul-tidecadal variations are ubiquitous in this CCSM3.5 simulation and inextricably linked with varia-tions in mechanisms connecting SST, zonal wind and thermocline depth.

Table 1 characterizes the mean state of the ocean, presented at 50-year intervals throughout themodel run. Of particular importance are the variances in NINO3 index (σNINO3) and in the meanzonal wind (σu). The former is used to distinguish between periods of strong/weak El Nino events,while the latter provides a rough idea of the magnitude of stochastic wind forcing.

We identify two periods of interest from this table, which illustrate the range of ENSO dynamicsin the model; these are model years 350-399 (P LO; low NINO3 variance) and 600-649 (P HI;high NINO3 variance). Note that the mean winds, wind variance, mean thermocline tilt, and meanthermocline depth differ very little between P LO and P HI, yet the NINO3 variance differs bynearly a factor of 2. Most proxy records are thought to detect quantities like ∆zth,zth, and u withunknown degrees of ‘noise’ from σNINO3 and σu.†

Table 1: Characterization of the state of the tropical Pacific in a 700-year integration of CCSM3.5,analyzed at 50-year intervals. Most proxy records are thought to sense quantities like ∆zth,zth,uwith unknown degrees of ‘noise’ from σNINO3 and σu.

Years σNINO3 (C2) ∆zth (m) Mean zth (m) u (m/s) σu (m2/s2)1-49 0.721 79.89 90.08 -15.39 0.727

50-99 0.554 83.10 93.50 -15.51 0.741100-149 0.635 85.20 94.08 -15.53 0.666150-199 0.674 86.09 95.00 -15.06 0.606200-249 0.690 86.31 95.04 -14.85 0.595250-299 0.589 88.73 94.98 -14.80 0.539300-349 0.641 88.67 94.84 -14.83 0.585

P LO 350-399 0.534 91.58 95.82 -14.64 0.517400-449 0.685 91.38 96.39 -14.87 0.514450-499 0.927 92.05 96.40 -14.89 0.574500-549 0.923 92.50 96.28 -14.52 0.512550-599 0.911 94.12 97.31 -14.77 0.619

P HI 600-649 1.041 93.36 97.51 -14.86 0.528650-699 0.777 95.26 98.45 -14.69 0.623

†The mean state of the model in this preliminary run has some remaining trends. In particular, the meridionaloverturning circulation weakens and the mean thermocline depth continues deepening in Table 1. However, this isonly a preliminary simulation: other versions of the CCSM and the higher-resolution version of CCSM3.5 have beensuccessfully run for thousand-year timescales without such issues and full spin-up of the production model is assured.

C–5

! " # $ %& %! %" %# %$&

&'%

&'!

&'(

&'"

&')

&'#

&'*

&'$

+,-./01.20345.%!(.361789.:+;

+0<=>.,1=<?708=>.-=17=8<4.@AB

:41703.@C4=15B! " # $ %& %! %" %# %$&

&'%

&'!

&'(

&'"

&')

&'#

&'*

&'$

&'+

,-./01234-5.67

8095:2;.59</0=5:2>5./5=9-23?7

8;>[email protected]%!(21B./=C2,DE

Using MTM-SVD to Compare: P_LO vs. P_HI

The application of the MTM-SVD decomposition method to data from a preliminary CCSM3.5 run has already yielded a great deal of information on the behavior of ENSO within the model. By comparing two 50-year segments of the run, it is possible to gain information on how precisely ENSO dynamics may differ within a single model, in the absence of other variations in the mean state.

Maps of MTM-SVD modes during P_HI and P_LO at various frequencies show that ENSO-like modes of variability appear and disappear as the period of oscillation changes. P_LO: Westward wave propagation is clearly visible in the first MTM-SVD mode (marked “delayed oscillator-like” in Figure 1), while at other times wave propagation is nearly absent. During times marked “recharge/discharge-like”, zonal wind variability is dominated by basin-wide anomalies, which we hypothesize to lead to discharge of water from the equatorial Pacific via Sverdrup transport.

The transition from a wave-dominated oscillation to a wind-dominated oscillation in the first MTM-SVD mode occurs at different periods in P_LO vs. P_HI. In P_LO, the transition happens first at roughly 3 years, then wave activity resumes at 5 year periods. In P_HI, the dynamics appear much different: “delayed oscillator-like” variability persists until periods of 6 years, then disappear in favor of variability dominated by basin-wide wind anomalies.

We theorize that the marked difference in NINO3 variance in P_LO vs. P_HI, despite similarities in mean state between the two time periods, is a result of differences in interaction between distinct dynamical modes. Some modes are likely to resemble the “delayed oscillator”, while others do not; these may be acting as “recharge/discharge” oscillators, or perhaps other dynamics come into play. Further work is necessary to diagnose the precise dynamical mechanisms at work throughout the model run.

The new parameterization for atmospheric convection has greatly improved the representation of ENSO in the CCSM, but exactly what dynamical changes have resulted remains unclear. In an effort to diagnose these changes, the multitaper method/singular value decomposition (MTM-SVD; Lees & Park, 1995) method has been applied to our model run. The periods of interest are 50 years in length, and have been selected because they differ in mean state only in terms of the NINO3 variance present; making “P_LO” and “P_HI” excellent test cases for the effects of dynamical changes on ENSO behavior. The MTM-SVD method has proved effective at diagnosing ENSO in the past (Mann and Lees, 1996), and appears quite helpful in this case as well. We see marked changes in the distribution of variance with frequency in P_HI vs. P_LO, as well as dynamical effects which may represent changes in the importance of delayed-oscillator type wave dynamics relative to recharge and discharge of heat from the equatorial Pacific.

Local fractional variance (LFV) for P_LO (left) and P_HI (right), including the first three modes of the MTM-SVD.

Figure 2: PHI MTM-SVD results at oscillation period of 2.94 years, at phases 0 (upper left), 1.07(upper right), 2.87 (lower left) and 4.85 (lower right).

2

MTM-SVD decomposition during P_HI at an oscillation period of 2.94 years, in SST (top panels), thermocline depth (middle panels) and zonal wind (bottom panels). Four arbitrary phases are chosen for each, to illustrate the behavior of the oscillation in all fields.

!! !" !# !$ % $ # " !!"

!#

!$

%

$

#

"

&'()*+,-./0&1&2"0334

&'()*+,-./05#%

&1&2"65#%078*9.0'(:,;0<'(0=

>20*;07.(,'/#?@!$A0B.*(9

P_LO: Maximum NINO3 amplitude MTM-SVD maps for the dominant mode of variability, at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. ENSO-like variability in SST is apparent at 2.94 and 6.25 years, but at 3.84 an additional mode is present, possibly representing a recharge/discharge-like oscillation.

!!"# !! !$"# $ $"# ! !"#!!

!$"%

!$"&

!$"'

!$"(

$

$"(

$"'

$"&

$"%

!

)*+,-./0123)4)563778

)*+,-./01239($

)4)56:9($3;<-=13*+>/?3@*+3A

B53-?3;1+/*26"%'&#3C1-+=D3,*21!

P_HI: Maximum NINO3 amplitude MTM-SVD maps for the dominant mode of variability, at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. ENSO-like patterns in SST are visible, along with wave propagation in thermocline depth, for all periods less than 6 years. At this point, the dynamics appear to shift to a mode more governed by wind activity.

!!"# !! !$"# !$ !%"# % %"# $ $"# ! !"#!!

!$"#

!$

!%"#

%

%"#

$

$"#

!

&'()*+,-./0&1&230445

&'()*+,-./06!%

&1&2376!%089*:.0'(;,<0='(0>

?20*<08.(,'/@"!#%@0A.*(:B0)'/.$

P_LO: Z20 (mean themocline depth in the eastern Pacific (5S-5N, 130E-80W) vs. NINO3 SST, following Kessler (2002). Plots shown for the dominant MTM-SVD mode (top) and second mode (bottom), at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. Arrows indicate direction of increasing phase.

!! !" !# !$ % $ # " !!#&'

!#

!$&'

!$

!%&'

%

%&'

$

$&'

#

#&'

()*+,-./012(3(4"2556

()*+,-./0127#%

(3(4"87#%29:,;02)*<.=2>)*2?

@32,=290*.)1#&A!$'2B0,*;

!! !" !# !$ % $ # " !!"

!#

!$

%

$

#

"

&'()*+,-./0&1&2"0334

&'()*+,-./05#%

&1&2"65#%078*9.0'(:,;0<'(0=

>10*;07.(,'/"?@!AB0C.*(9

!!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$!!"#

!!"$

!!"%

!!"&

!

!"&

!"%

!"$

'()*+,-./01'2'341556

'()*+,-./017&!

'2'3487&!19:+;/1()<-=1>()1?

@21+=19/)-(0$"&A!$1B/+);

P_HI: Z20 (mean themocline depth in the eastern Pacific (5S-5N, 130E-80W) vs. NINO3 SST, following Kessler (2002). Plots shown for the dominant MTM-SVD mode (top) and second mode (bottom), at periods of 2.94, 3.84 and 6.25 years. Arrows indicate direction of increasing phase.

!!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& !!"' ! !"' !"& !"% !"$ !"#!!"&#

!!"&

!!"'#

!!"'

!!"!#

!

!"!#

!"'

!"'#

!"&

!"&#

()*+,-./012(3(4%2556

()*+,-./0127&!

(3(4%87&!29:,;02)*<.=2>)*2?

@42,=290*.)1&"A$'#2B0,*;C2+)10&

!!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$!!"#

!!"$

!!"%

!!"&

!

!"&

!"%

!"$

!"#

'()*+,-./01'2'341556

'()*+,-./017&!

'2'3487&!19:+;/1()<-=1>()1?

@31+=19/)-(04"#%$A1B/+);C1*(0/&

!!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$!!"&

!!"'(

!!"'

!!"!(

!

!"!(

!"'

!"'(

!"&

)*+,-./0123)4)563778

)*+,-./01239&!

)4)56:9&!3;<-=13*+>/?3@*+3A

B53-?3;1+/*2$"&(!$3C1-+=D3,*21&

!!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& !!"' ! !"' !"& !"% !"$ !"#!!"(

!!")

!!"$

!!"&

!

!"&

!"$

!")

*+,-./01234*5*6%4778

*+,-./012349&!

*5*6%:9&!4;<.=24+,>0?4@+,4A

B54.?4;2,0+3%"($)#4C2.,=D4-+32&

Mode 1

Mode 2

Mode 1: Delayed oscillator-like?

Mode 1: Recharge/discharge-like?

Mode 1: Delayed oscillator-like?

Mode 1: Recharge/discharge -like?

Example MTM-SVD Fields

!!"# !!"$ !!"% !!"& ! !"& !"% !"$!!"&

!!"'(

!!"'

!!"!(

!

!"!(

!"'

!"'(

!"&

)*+,-./0123)4)563778

)*+,-./01239&!

)4)56:9&!3;<-=13*+>/?3@*+3A

B53-?3;1+/*2$"&(!$3C1-+=D3,*21&

!!"# !!"$% !!"$ !!"!% ! !"!% !"$ !"$%!!"#%

!!"#

!!"$%

!!"$

!!"!%

!

!"!%

!"$

!"$%

!"#

!"#%

&'()*+,-./0&1&230445

&'()*+,-./06#!

&1&2376#!089*:.0'(;,<0='(0>

?10*<08.(,'/#"@A$%0B.*(:C0)'/.#