Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable...

45
1 Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Analysis and Economic Outlook Kevin Liu Executive Director Brendan Ahern Chief Investment Officer

Transcript of Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable...

Page 1: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

1

Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Analysis and Economic Outlook

Kevin LiuExecutive Director

Brendan AhernChief Investment Officer

Page 2: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Introduction to KraneShares

About KraneShares

Krane Funds Advisors, LLC is the investment manager for KraneShares ETFs. Our suite of China focused ETFs provides investors with solutions to capture China’s importance as an essential element of a well-designed investment portfolio. We strive to provide innovative, first to market strategies that have been developed based on our strong partnerships and our deep knowledge of investing. We help investors stay current on global market trends and aim to provide meaningful diversification. Krane Funds Advisors, LLC is majority owned by China International Capital Corporation (CICC).

2

Introduction

Page 3: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

3

Introduction

About the Speakers

Kevin Liu joined China International Capital Corporation (CICC) in 2011 and holds the title of Executive Director as a Strategist in the Research Department. From a top-down strategy approach by incorporating macro (growth and policy) and micro variables (corporate earnings and valuations etc.), his main responsibility is to provide investors with investment strategies, as well as cross-market/asset/sector allocation recommendations. His focuses include Chinese equities as well as general global markets. Mr. Liu ranked the second in Portfolio Strategy of the 2017 II All-China and Mainland China Best Analysts Ranking. Prior to CICC, Mr. Liu worked as a Quantitative Strategist with UBS Hong Kong. He obtained his master degrees from both Cornell University and Tsinghua University.

Brendan Ahern joined KraneShares in June 2012 to head the firm’s efforts in becoming the leading provider of China-focused exchange traded funds (ETFs) and Chinese investment education for US clients. Since early 2001, Brendan worked for one the largest global ETF providers where he was an original member of the business development team. His “from the ground up” experience at a global ETF provider allowed him to become intimately acquainted with all aspects of the business. His expertise spans product development, marketing, branding, business strategy, operations, portfolio management, trading, and client execution.

Kevin LiuExecutive Director

Brendan AhernChief Investment Officer

Page 4: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

4

For questions during the presentation please email: [email protected]

Page 5: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Navigating the Secular Trends in China- ”3Cs”: Challenge, Change and Chance

Kevin LIU, CFAEquity Strategist, Executive Director

[email protected]: S0080512030003SFC CE Red: AVH867

September 2019

Page 6: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Part I: Current market and macro condition

Page 7: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

How China performed YTD? Still ranking the top globally

Source: Bloomberg, Factset, CICC Research 7

22.3%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30% Global Assets Performance YTD (in USD)

EquityFixed IncomeFXCommodityAlternative

162%

Page 8: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path

8Source: CEIC, CICC Research

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Jun-

07

Jun-

08

Jun-

09

Jun-

10

Jun-

11

Jun-

12

Jun-

13

Jun-

14

Jun-

15

Jun-

16

Jun-

17

Jun-

18

Jun-

19

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth (YoY)

Real GDP growth (QoQ annualized)

%

6.2

6.6

GDP growth target for 2019: 6%-6.5%

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Jul-0

8

Jul-0

9

Jul-1

0

Jul-1

1

Jul-1

2

Jul-1

3

Jul-1

4

Jul-1

5

Jul-1

6

Jul-1

7

Jul-1

8

Jul-1

9

Growth of industrial value added

VAI growth (YoY)VAI growth (QoQ annualized)

%

Page 9: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: CEIC, CICC Research

Monetary: TSF picked up early this year, but moderated again since May after BSB takeover

9

10.7 %

8.1%

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

Jun-

08

Jun-

09

Jun-

10

Jun-

11

Jun-

12

Jun-

13

Jun-

14

Jun-

15

Jun-

16

Jun-

17

Jun-

18

Jun-

19

Adjusted TSF & M2

Adjusted TSF growth* M2 growth

YoY (%)

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

May

-16

Jul-1

6Se

p-16

Nov

-16

Jan-

17M

ar-1

7M

ay-1

7Ju

l-17

Sep-

17N

ov-1

7Ja

n-18

Mar

-18

May

-18

Jul-1

8Se

p-18

Nov

-18

Jan-

19M

ar-1

9M

ay-1

9Ju

l-19

Rmb trn

New total social financing

ABS & written-off loansNon-financial equity financingLocal government special bond financingCorporate bond financingTrust loansEntrusted loans & banker's acceptance billLoans

Page 10: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Property: more resilient than expected especially for tier-1 cities, but inv’t growth may slow down in 2H

10Note: * Property floor space sold is 3-month moving average. Tier-1 cities (4): Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen. Tier-2 cities (13): Tianjin, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Nanchang, Chengdu, Qingdao, Suzhou, Fuzhou, Xiamen, Changsha, Harbin, ChangchunSource: CEIC, Wind Info, CICC Research

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120Ja

n-13

Jul-1

3

Jan-

14

Jul-1

4

Jan-

15

Jul-1

5

Jan-

16

Jul-1

6

Jan-

17

Jul-1

7

Jan-

18

Jul-1

8

Jan-

19

Jul-1

9

Tier-1 Tier-2 Tier-3

YoY (%)

Property floor space sold, 30 large & mid-sized cities

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70total floor space sold, 12mma

property investment new starts (sqmt),12mma

real monthly property investment*

% chg yoy

* real FAI of property investment is calculated using nominal property investment deflated by PPI

Page 11: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Retail sales: non-housing related discretionary consumption also stayed resilient YTD

11Source: CEIC, CICC Research

Page 12: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Auto: sales remain sluggish but improved sequentially

12Source: CEIC, CICC Research

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Jul-0

8

Jul-0

9

Jul-1

0

Jul-1

1

Jul-1

2

Jul-1

3

Jul-1

4

Jul-1

5

Jul-1

6

Jul-1

7

Jul-1

8

Jul-1

9

Passenger car sales volume growth and tax rate cut

Purchase tax of passenger vehicles of 1.6L or below was reduced to 5%

Tax rate was raised to 7.5%

Purchase tax ratereturned to 10%

Purchase tax of passenger vehicles of 1.6L or below was reduced to 5%

Purchase tax rate was raised to 7.5%

Purchase tax rate returned to 10%

Subsidy on autos for rural households

YoY (%)

VAT tax rate wascut down by 3ppt to 13% since Apri 1, 2019

Page 13: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: Bloomberg, CICC Research

Monetary: there is more room and necessity to bring down LPR, MLF, and risk-free rates in China

13

1yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 6yr 7yr 8yr 9yr 10yr 15yr 20yr 30yr

Switzerland -1.09 -1.10 -1.13 -1.12 -1.10 -1.07 -1.04 -1.03 -1.07 -0.99 -0.79 -0.70 -0.53

Japan -0.25 -0.31 -0.31 -0.34 -0.35 -0.37 -0.39 -0.38 -0.34 -0.28 -0.09 0.06 0.15

Germany -0.82 -0.89 -0.92 -0.93 -0.89 -0.89 -0.86 -0.82 -0.76 -0.69 -0.55 -0.41 -0.19

Netherlands -0.86 -0.90 -0.87 -0.81 -0.75 -0.72 -0.65 -0.62 -0.56 -0.20

Denmark -0.86 -0.89 -0.88 -0.83 -0.76 -0.65 -0.45

Finland -0.67 -0.77 -0.79 -0.77 -0.76 -0.66 -0.63 -0.55 -0.50 -0.43 -0.25 0.03

France -0.74 -0.80 -0.84 -0.82 -0.75 -0.69 -0.63 -0.56 -0.49 -0.41 -0.10 0.00 0.43

Sweden -0.64 -0.72 -0.70 -0.62 0.04 -0.53 -0.33 -0.16 0.11

Austria -0.65 -0.78 -0.78 -0.77 -0.71 -0.68 -0.60 -0.58 -0.52 -0.44 -0.19 -0.09 0.15

Belgium -0.80 -0.81 -0.74 -0.65 -0.62 -0.55 -0.49 -0.43 -0.35 -0.07 0.15 0.53

Ireland -0.55 -0.44 -0.65 -0.62 -0.54 -0.42 -0.34 0.57 -0.18 -0.09 0.22 0.42 0.75

Spain -0.51 -0.56 -0.54 -0.42 -0.36 -0.24 -0.15 -0.08 -0.02 0.08 0.49 0.97

Italy -0.17 -0.11 0.22 0.36 0.55 0.59 0.81 0.87 0.90 1.14 1.66 1.84 2.20

United States 1.73 1.51 1.43 1.38 1.43 1.47 1.93

China 2.59 2.71 2.80 2.76 2.92 3.19 3.09 3.12 3.15 3.05 3.67

More yields are turning negative global wise, except US and China

China-US yield spread continues to widen

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

0

1

2

3

4

5

Jan-

14

Jun-

14

Nov-

14

Apr-1

5

Sep-

15

Feb-

16

Jul-1

6

Dec-

16

May

-17

Oct-1

7

Mar

-18

Aug-

18

Jan-

19

Jun-

19

China 10yr yield US 10yr yield

China-US USD/CNY (RHS, inverted)

Page 14: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: CEIC, CICC Research

Fiscal: deficit and local gov’t bond issuance expanded to lend supports for moderate recovery in infrastructure inv’t

14

-1,400

-1,200

-1,000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Government revenue less expenditure Jan-July

General public budget

Government fund

Rmb bn

Deficit widened or surplusnarrowed

222

603 774

440

77 284

1263

70

632 504 252

731 709

385

143

747

745

-1

611

261

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19

Net issuance of local government bonds

Local government general bonds

Local government special bonds

Rmb bn

1Q17: Rmb 0.5 trn

1Q18:Rmb 0.2 trn

1Q19: Rmb 1.2 trn

Page 15: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Growth forecast: China’s real GDP is expected to grow 6.2% YoY in 2019 and 6% YoY in 2020

15Source: Bloomberg, Wind Info, CICC Research

7.0 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.2 6.1 6

6.7 7.2

6.0 6.1

7.0 7.3

7.8

9.6

11.7 11.4 11.3 11.2

10.3 10.1

9.1

7.8 8.2 8.0 7.9

2

4

6

8

10

12

5

6

7

8

9

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2015: 6.9% 2016: 6.7% 2017: 6.7% 2018: 6.6% 2019E: 6.2%

%Real GDP YoY Nominal GDP YoY (RHS)%

Page 16: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: CEIC, EPFR, CICC Research

RMB: this time is less of a shock; global easing also offers some cushion; but weaker RMB does weigh on global flows

16

6.0

6.2

6.4

6.6

6.8

7.0

7.2(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

0

500

1,000

1,500

Jan-

14

Jun-

14

Nov-

14

Apr-1

5

Sep-

15

Feb-

16

Jul-1

6

Dec-

16

May

-17

Oct-1

7

Mar

-18

Aug-

18

Jan-

19

Jun-

19

Overseas flows to HK EquitiesUSD/CNY (Inverted, RHS)15-day mavg

(US$m)

Overseas flows to HK is tightly correlated with RMB

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

% Implied appreication/depreciation rate by CNY NDF

3M NDF12M NDF

8/11Reform RMB

depreciatedrapidlyinearly2016

USD/CNYbrokethe"7"thresholdonAug. 5,2019

Page 17: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Where the market stands now? The phase of “Hope”Valuation rebounded first for the “hope” of future earnings recovery

Source: Bloomberg, CICC Research 17

5.8

6.3

6.8

7.3

7.8

8.3

8.8

9.3

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

Feb-

15Ap

r-15

Jun-

15Au

g-15

Oct

-15

Dec

-15

Feb-

16Ap

r-16

Jun-

16Au

g-16

Oct

-16

Dec

-16

Feb-

17Ap

r-17

Jun-

17Au

g-17

Oct

-17

Dec

-17

Feb-

18Ap

r-18

Jun-

18Au

g-18

Oct

-18

Dec

-18

Feb-

19Ap

r-19

Jun-

19Au

g-19

12m fwd EPS (RHS) MSCI China Index 12m fwd PE2016/9/1=100

Despair

Optimism

Suspicion

DespairOptimism

Suspicion Hope

Hope

Page 18: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Market consensus: the consensus estimates are still in the downturn

18Source: Factset, Go-goal, CICC Research

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400M

ay-0

8D

ec-0

8Ju

l-09

Feb-

10Se

p-10

Apr-1

1N

ov-1

1Ju

n-12

Jan-

13Au

g-13

Mar

-14

Oct

-14

May

-15

Dec

-15

Jul-1

6Fe

b-17

Sep-

17Ap

r-18

Nov

-18

Jun-

19

2009

2010

2011

20122013

20142015 2016

2017

2019

2018

CSI300 (RHS)

(Rmb bn) CSI300 Non-financials earnings forecast consensus

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

Jan-10

Aug-10

Mar-11

Oct-11

May-12

Dec-12

Jul-13

Feb-14

Sep-14

Apr-15

Nov-15

Jun-16

Jan-17

Aug-17

Mar-18

Oct-18

May-19

MSCI China Index EPS consensus estimates (Rmb)

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

20122011

2010

2019

MSCI China Index (RHS)

Page 19: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: Go-goal, CICC Research 19

Valuations: H-shares: close to the troughs repeatedly tested after the financial crisis

6

11

16

21

26

Mar

-06

Sep-

06M

ar-0

7Se

p-07

Mar

-08

Sep-

08M

ar-0

9Se

p-09

Mar

-10

Sep-

10M

ar-1

1Se

p-11

Mar

-12

Sep-

12M

ar-1

3Se

p-13

Mar

-14

Sep-

14M

ar-1

5Se

p-15

Mar

-16

Sep-

16M

ar-1

7Se

p-17

Mar

-18

Sep-

18M

ar-1

9

(X)

MSCI China (ex. A-share)MSCI China (ex. Financials & A-share )MSCI China (ex. Tencent, ADRs & A-share)

Avg. since 06

10.1

Avg. since 0612.6

7.6

-0.6 std.dev. below avg.-0.4 std.dev. below avg.

-0.9 std.dev. below avg.

MSCI China forward 12-month P/E

Page 20: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: Bloomberg, Wind, CICC Research

Competitive advantage: equity looks more attractive vs. bond, 1 std. dev. above historical average

20

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Apr-0

5

Feb-

06

Dec

-06

Oct

-07

Aug-

08

Jun-

09

Apr-1

0

Feb-

11

Dec

-11

Oct

-12

Aug-

13

Jun-

14

Apr-1

5

Feb-

16

Dec

-16

Oct

-17

Aug-

18

Jun-

19

CSI 300 dividend yield vs. China 10yr gov't yield

Div. yld. vs. 10yr bond yld. CSI 300 (RHS)

Page 21: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: Factset, Bloomberg, CICC Research 21

Competitive advantage: better risk-reward global wise

DM

S&P 500

Europe

Germany

France

Spain

JapanEM

Asia Pacific BRICs

India

Brazil

Russia

South AfricaASEAN

Korea

CSI 300

Shcomp

MSCI China

HSI

HSCEIMSCI HK

Nasdaq

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%

ROE vs. PB, 2019e

2019e ROE

2019e P/B

DM

S&P 500

Europe

Germany

France

Spain

Japan

EM

Asia Pacific

BRICs

India

Brazil

Russia

South AfricaASEAN

Korea

CSI 300Shcomp

MSCI China HSI

HSCEI

MSCI HK

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30%

EPS Growth vs. PE, 2019e

2019e EPS growth

2019e P/E

Page 22: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Part II: Challenges and policy responses

Page 23: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

External: trade frictions might still pose external demand shocks in the near term

23Source: USTR, Wind, CICC Research

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

% US imports from China

$50bn list $200bn list Other

Page 24: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Sectors affected by tariffs more initially are mostly labor intensive

24Source: USTR, Wind, CICC Research

Page 25: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Exports to U.S.2%

Supporting industries of exports to

U.S.3%

Exports to non-U.S.

areas10%

Supporting industries of exports to non-U.S.

areas19%

Domestic demand

66%

Breakdown of China's industrial output

14

18

23

26

28

29

57

64

64

0 20 40 60 80

Non-metalproducts

Food &beverages

Oil & gas

Mining

Othermanufacturing

Metal products

Footwear &apparel

Machinery

Chemicals

Exports to USSupporting industries of exports to USExports to non-USSupporting industries of exports to non-US

%

Breakdown of China's industrial output: by sector

Existing tariffs may drag down China 2019 nominal GDP by 0.4ppt in base case scenario

Source: Bloomberg, Wind, CICC Research 25

Page 26: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

26

Scenario analysis on US-Chinatrade friction

Impact onexport growth

Impact on GDPgrowth

Impact on nonfinancia l

l i s tcosrevenuegrowth

Impact on netmargin of non

financia lsl i s tcos

Impact onearnings

growth of nonfinancia l

l i s tcos overnext 12months

A-share non financials

Bul l -2.2% -0.2% -0.5% -0.1% -2.3%

Base -4.0% -0.4% -0.9% -0.1% -4.2%

Bear -6.2% -0.6% -1.4% -0.2% -6.6%

Offshore Chinese non financials

Bul l -2.2% -0.2% -0.5% -0.1% -2.8%

Base -4.0% -0.4% -0.9% -0.3% -5.1%

Bear -6.2% -0.6% -1.5% -0.4% -8.1%

Assumption 1: US$50bn/US$200bn/Remainders imports to tariff has elasticity of 2/1.5/1 respectively

Assumption 2: A-share/offshore Chinese non-financials revenue to nominal GDP growth has elasticity of 2.31/2.44Assumption 3: A-share/offshore Chinese non-financials net margin to export growth has elasticity of 0.03/0.07

A-shares’ earnings growth could thereby be 4.2ppt lower due to the tariffs in base case

Source: Factset, Wind, CICC Research

Page 27: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

But further escalation could also hurt US by passing through higher cost and domestic inflation

27Source: USTR, PIIE, Wind, CICC Research

34100

9275

8749

6273

6864

5756

5150

4110

7

211

126

1227

1720

2341

1330

1777

4518

22

113

6

1314

203

3620

4113

4782

66

412

3219

12

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

MineralsHide & skins

TransportationAnimal products

Prepared foodChemicals

MiscellaneousFuel

MetalsWood products

Plastics & rubberVegetable products

MachineryStone & glass

ElectronicsTextiles

FootwearToys

Breakdown of US tariffs on Chinese goods by products

As of Sep 23, 2018 List A (Sep 1, 2019) List B (Dec 15, 2019) Not covered

46

8222

3829

21

111

1140

29

437

4930

4

440

22

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Overall

IntermediateOthers

Capital GoodsFinal Consumption

Breakdown of US tariffs on Chinese goods

As of Sep 23, 2018 List A (Sep 1, 2019) List B (Dec 15, 2019) Not covered

Page 28: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Policy responses: 1) boost domestic demands (e.g. VAT & fee cut, auto, infrastructure inv’t); 2) to open service accounts

28Source: Wind, CICC Research

-400

-350

-300

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

US total trade deficit to China

US service surplus to China

US$bn

20.522.923.8

26.228.829.129.530.030.1

33.134.0

37.037.337.8

39.239.840.840.9

42.943.8

46.146.346.747.047.4

49.049.1

51.552.153.053.1

57.760.4

64.965.1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

CanadaHong Kong…

DenmarkIsrael

SwitzerlandSouth Africa

ThailandUnited…

IndonesiaKorea, Rep.

ChileNorwayFinland

VietnamMalaysiaPortugal

NetherlandsTurkey

PhilippinesUnited States

Czech…Russian…

JapanSpain

AustraliaGermanySwedenAustria

IndiaMexico

ItalyBelgiumFranceChinaBrazil

Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit)

Page 29: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

29

Internal: the mystery of China’s “high leverage”: high savings + the inefficient financial system

Source: CEIC, Wind, CICC Research

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

Mar

-01

Mar

-02

Mar

-03

Mar

-04

Mar

-05

Mar

-06

Mar

-07

Mar

-08

Mar

-09

Mar

-10

Mar

-11

Mar

-12

Mar

-13

Mar

-14

Mar

-15

Mar

-16

Mar

-17

Mar

-18

Mar

-19

%China: debt/GDP Deposits/GDP

Page 30: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

30

By sector: more critical for corporate and LGFV; household & govt sectors are in net cash

Source: BIS, Wind, Factset, CICC Research

375

358

311

302

295

279

260

254

253

250

238

235

185

176

158

151

131

123

114

112

78

77

70

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Japa

nH

KFr

ance

Can

ada

Gre

ece

UK

Spai

nC

hina

Italy US

Kore

aAu

stra

liaM

alay

sia

Ger

man

yBr

azil

Thai

land

Sout

h Af

rica

Indi

aTu

rkey

Arge

ntin

aR

ussi

aM

exic

oIn

done

sia

Global non-financial sector debt to GDP, 2018(%)

120

101 98 87

76 72 69 66 60 59 58 53 53 53 40

34 28 17 17 16 15 11 7

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Aust

ralia

Can

ada

Kore

aU

KU

SH

KTh

aila

ndM

alay

sia

Fran

ceSp

ain

Japa

nG

erm

any

Gre

ece

Chi

naIta

lySo

uth

Afric

aBr

azil

Rus

sia

Indo

nesi

aM

exic

oTu

rkey

Indi

aAr

gent

ina

Global household sector debt to GDP, 2018(%)

219

152 141 117

103 102 93 84 75 74 70 70 68 58 57 48 46 45 42 39 26 23 16

0

50

100

150

200

250

HK

Chi

naFr

ance

Can

ada

Japa

nKo

rea

Spai

nU

KAu

stra

lia US

Italy

Turk

eyM

alay

sia

Gre

ece

Ger

man

yTh

aila

ndR

ussi

aIn

dia

Braz

ilSo

uth

Afric

aM

exic

oIn

done

sia

Arge

ntin

a

Global corporate sector debt to GDP, 2018(%)

203 182

132

99 99 97 90 87 87 80 67 66 61 59 51 50 39 37 35 34 30 30

15

0

50

100

150

200

250

Japa

nG

reec

eIta

ly US

Fran

ceSp

ain

Arge

ntin

aBr

azil

UK

Can

ada

Indi

aH

KG

erm

any

Sout

h Af

rica

Mal

aysi

aC

hina

Kore

aAu

stra

liaM

exic

oTh

aila

ndTu

rkey

Indo

nesi

aR

ussi

a

Global government sector debt to GDP, 2018(%)

Page 31: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: Wind, CICC Research

Policy responses: promote long-term investors (institutional & foreign); share of retail investors could be below 50% now

31

8.4% 14.7%

18.5% 22.1%

31.3% 24.5% 23.1%

19.4% 18.0% 16.9% 14.5% 11.4% 7.7% 6.3% 8.6% 10.4%

13.1% 7.0%

9.5%

11.2% 7.3%

6.9% 9.4% 9.0% 8.7%

7.2% 7.5% 8.4% 6.7%

8.4%

3.9%

1.7% 4.6%

3.6% 4.1% 4.1%

3.2% 2.5% 2.9% 2.7%

2.7%

1.5%

3.8% 3.6% 5.3% 4.6%

4.8% 5.5% 9.2% 6.5%

8.5% 7.4%

6.9% 8.2%

7.8%

2.3% 2.9%

2.9% 2.9%

3.1% 3.7% 3.8%

3.9%

2.6%

3.1% 4.8%

6.3%

91.6% 85.3%

68.5% 67.1%

53.8% 56.3% 62.8%

66.9% 64.8% 64.7% 67.6% 70.1% 62.7%

57.5% 57.5% 50.5%

8.4%

14.7%

31.5% 32.9%

46.2% 43.7%

37.2% 33.1%

35.2% 35.3% 32.4%

29.9%

37.3%

42.5% 42.5%

49.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

A-share investor structure (% of total free-float market cap)Individualinvestors

Foreigninvestors

NationalTeam

Enterpriseannuity

Private funds

Broker

Socialsecurityfunds

Insurers

Mutual funds

All domesticinstitutions

Institutional investors

Page 32: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: CEIC, Wind, CICC Research

But current small-bank deleveraging and tightening financial regulations could weigh on TSF growth

32

Page 33: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Thank you!

Page 34: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

34

Mainland Chinese equity market is selling at a multi-year low discount to US equities

1The price-earnings ratio (P/E Ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per-share earnings.Source: Bloomberg as of 8/31/2019

-15-10

-505

10152025303540

6/1/

2002

2/1/

2003

10/1

/200

3

6/1/

2004

2/1/

2005

10/1

/200

5

6/1/

2006

2/1/

2007

10/1

/200

7

6/1/

2008

2/1/

2009

10/1

/200

9

6/1/

2010

2/1/

2011

10/1

/201

1

6/1/

2012

2/1/

2013

10/1

/201

3

6/1/

2014

2/1/

2015

10/1

/201

5

6/1/

2016

2/1/

2017

10/1

/201

7

6/1/

2018

2/1/

2019

Shanghai Composite Index P/E – S&P 500 Index P/E1

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

6/1/2002

6/1/2003

6/1/2004

6/1/2005

6/1/2006

6/1/2007

6/1/2008

6/1/2009

6/1/2010

6/1/2011

6/1/2012

6/1/2013

6/1/2014

6/1/2015

6/1/2016

6/1/2017

6/1/2018

6/1/2019

Shanghai Composite Index P/B – S&P 500 Index P/B2

2The price to book ratio (P/B Ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per-share book value.

Page 35: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Source: Bloomberg, Wind, CICC Research

There have been continuous foreign inflows via stock and bond connect into Chinese domestic assets

35

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

Dec

-13

Mar

-14

Jun-

14

Sep-

14

Dec

-14

Mar

-15

Jun-

15

Sep-

15

Dec

-15

Mar

-16

Jun-

16

Sep-

16

Dec

-16

Mar

-17

Jun-

17

Sep-

17

Dec

-17

Mar

-18

Jun-

18

Sep-

18

Dec

-18

Mar

-19

Jun-

19

Foreign Holdings of domestic Chinese assets: Equity Foreign Holdings: BondRMB bn

Page 36: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

The Index MattersMSCI is a trusted index provider for the largest global investment managers

1 As of June 30, 2018, as reported on September 30, 2018 by eVestment, Morningstar and Bloomberg, retrieved 6/30/2019.2 Based on latest P&I AUM data and MSCI clients as of March 2018, retrieved 6/30/2019.3 As of September 2018 , retrieved 6/30/2019; defined as each share class of an exchange traded fund, as identified by a separate Bloomberg ticker. Only primary listings, and not cross-listings, are counted.4 As of Dec 2016, according to Intersec LLC , retrieved 6/30/2019.

36

Page 37: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

The China A-Share market is too big to ignoreEven though China is the world’s second largest economy and stock market, China A-Shares are still underrepresented in global capital markets.

371. Data from MSCI as of 8/31/2019. See end of the presentation for index definitions

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

United States Japan UnitedKingdom

China France

Top 5 Country Weights in MSCI All Country World Index (Market cap weighted)1

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

United States China Japan Germany France

Top 5 Country Weights in the MSCI All Country World Index (GDP Weighted)1

Page 38: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

MSCI’s current Global Standard definition of China only represents a small portion of China’s total market The MSCI China Index was historically limited to Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Recently, MSCI expanded this definition to include US-listed Chinese companies. This definition represents only a small percentage of Chinese stocks.

Source: MSCI Data as of 7/31/2019, Retrieved on 8/31/2019.See end of the presentation for index definitions.

*Excluding Singapore listed (0.1%)Source: MSCI as of 7/31/2019. 38

MSCI’s Current Global Standard Definition of China

MSCI China Index Hong Kong and US = 94.7%China A-Shares = 5.3%500 Stocks

MSCI’s Definition of Entire Mainland A-Share Market

MSCI China A Onshore IMI Index Shanghai and Shenzhen only2,411 Stocks Mainland China

A-Shares59.18%

Hong Kong Listed

Chinese Companies

30.25%

U.S. Listed Chinese

Companies10.49%

CHINA A-SHARE CLASS BREAKDOWN OFMSCI ALL CHINA INVESTABLE MARKET INDEX (IMI)*

Page 39: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

China26.3

China A Shares

17.4Korea10.5

Taiwan9.0

India7.2

Others29.6

China29.7

China A Shares

2.6Korea11.5Taiwan

11.2

India8.7

Others36.3

On February 28, 2019, MSCI made a larger than expected China A-Share inclusion announcement. MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of China A-Shares in their Global Standard Indexes from 5% to 20% in 2019.

Currently, $1.8 trillion track the MSCI EM Index. Up to $300b are expected to be reallocated to China A-Shares after full inclusion.

• On September 3, 2018 MSCI completed the first 5% inclusion of China A-Shares within the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

• Then, on February 28, 2019, MSCI announced they will increase the inclusion factor of China A-Shares from 5% to 20% in 2019.

• The full proposed inclusion weight is projected to reach 17.4% of the Emerging Markets Index.

• We believe multiple inclusions could provide a sustained catalyst for the outperformance of the Mainland market.

China30.5

China A Shares

0.8Korea15.0Taiwan

11.1

India8.3

Others34.3

2018 Inclusion1 Post August 2019 Inclusion2 Future Proposed Inclusion3

1. MSCI.com/China retrieved 6/30/20192. MSCI3. MSCI, “China and the future of equity allocations”, June 2019.

39

Current and Country Weights within the MSCI Emerging Markets Index Potential

1.Data from Bloomberg as of 8/31/2019, calculated by KraneShares.2.Data from MSCI as of 8/31/2019. See page end of presentation for index definitions.

Page 40: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

China is the largest country in the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index by weight and by number of securities

40Data from MSCI as of 8/31/2019. See end of the presentation for index definitions

China, 32%

South Korea, 11%Taiwan,

11%

India, 9%

Brazil, 7%

Other, 29%

% of MSCI EM Index - by Weight

China, 42%

South Korea,

9%Taiwan,

7%

India, 7%

Brazil, 5%

Other, 31%

% of MSCI EM Index - by Number of Securities

Page 41: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

411.Data from Bloomberg as of 8/31/2019, calculated by KraneShares.2.Data from MSCI as of 8/31/2019. See page end of presentation for index definitions.

We believe that the MSCI China A Index has distinct advantages over the CSI 300 Index.• The CSI 300 Index, originally built for domestic Chinese investors, consists of the 300 largest China A-Share stocks ranked by market capitalization.

• In comparison, the MSCI China A Index currently tracks 443 securities deemed most suitable for international investors by MSCI.

• The constituent count overlap of these indexes is 52%1.

• We believe gaining exposure to China A-Shares through an MSCI index provides international investors with several distinct advantages.

MSCI China A Index and CSI 300 Index Comparison2

MSCI China A Index CSI 300 Index MSCI Advantage

Index Construction Methodology

Based on MSCI’s Global Investable Market Index (GIMI) methodology

Largest 300 China A-share companies ranked by full market capitalization

Consistent with MSCI EM and MSCI ACWI which enables building and monitoring portfolios in a cohesive manner

Eligible UniverseOnly A-shares that can be traded through Stock Connect

Any A-share listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges No QFII or RQFII quota restraints

Foreign Ownership Takes into account Chinese regulator’s foreign ownership limits of 30%

Does not consider foreign ownership limits, creating potential for tracking error Tailored for foreign investors

Size SegmentationLarge Cap Size Segment targets 70%, Standard Size Segment targets 85%, and IMI Size Segment targets 99% of the coverage universe

Uses a fixed number of constituentsmethodology

Designed to dynamically reflect the growing China capital markets

Index Review Semi-Annual and Quarterly Index Reviews Semi-Annual Reviews More timely reflection of the market

Page 42: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

42

Conclusion:

• On June 1, 2018, MSCI commenced the multi-year process of including China A-Shares into their Global Standard Indexes.

• This rebalance has triggered what may be one of the largest asset transfers in recent history, causing hundreds of billions of dollars to be reallocated to China A-Share securities.

• We believe full inclusion could take up to five years, potentially providing a sustained catalyst for the performance of China’s Mainland market.

Potential Full Inclusion of China A-Shares Within the MSCI Emerging Markets Index

Source: MSCI, “China and the future of equity allocations”, June 2019.

China26.3

China A Shares

17.4Korea10.5

Taiwan9.0

India7.2

Others29.6

Page 43: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Important legal disclosures

General DisclosuresThis document has been produced by China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited (CICCHKS). This document is based on information available to the public that we consider reliable, but CICCHKS and its associated company(ies)(collectively, hereinafter “CICC”) do not represent that it is accurate or complete. The information and opinions contained herein are for investors’ reference only and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of any client, and are not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned. Under no circumstances shall the information contained herein or the opinions expressed herein constitute a personal recommendation to anyone. Investors should make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this research document, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs. CICC does not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. Neither CICC nor its related persons shall be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.The performance information (including any expression of opinion or forecast) herein reflect the most up-to-date opinions, speculations and forecasts at the time of the document’s production and publication. Such opinions, speculations and forecasts are subject to change and may be amended without any notification. At different periods, CICC may release documents which are inconsistent with the opinions, speculations and forecasts contained herein.

The analysts named in this document may have from time to time discussed with our clients, including CICC salespeople, traders, and other professionals, or may discuss in this document, trading strategies that reference catalysts or events that may have a near-term impact on the market price of the equity securities discussed in this document, which impact may be directionally counter to the analysts' published price target expectations for such stocks. Any such trading strategies are distinct from and do not affect the analysts' fundamental equity rating for such stocks as described herein.

CICC’s salespeople, traders, and other professionals may provide oral or written market commentary or trading ideas that may be inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the recommendations and opinions presented in this document. Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the persons who prepared them, and CICC is under no obligation to ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought to the attention of any recipient of this document. CICC’s asset management area, proprietary trading desks and other investing businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or opinions expressed in this document.

Unless stated otherwise, any performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a indicator of future performance. No representation or warranty is made that any returns indicated will be achieved. Certain assumptions may have been made in this analysis which have resulted in any returns detailed herein. Changes to the assumptions may have a material impact on any returns detailed.To the extent this material is provided to any recipient, this material is provided solely on the basis that the recipient has the capability to independently evaluate investment risk and is exercising independent judgment in evaluating investment decisions in that its investment decisions will be based on its own independent assessment of the opportunities and risks presented by a potential investment, market factors and other investment considerations.

This document is distributed in Hong Kong by CICCHKS, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission. Queries concerning CICC Research from readers in Hong Kong should be directed to our Hong Kong sales representatives.

This document is distributed in Singapore only to accredited investors and/or institutional investors, as defined in the Securities and Futures Act, by China International Capital Corporation (Singapore) Pte. Limited (“CICCSG”), which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. By virtue of distribution by CICCSG to these categories of investors in Singapore, disclosure under Section 36 of the Financial Adviser Act (which relates to disclosure of a financial adviser’s interest and/or its representative’s interest in securities) is not required. Recipients of this document in Singapore should contact CICCSG in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with this document. This document is not intended for and should not be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person in the jurisdiction of Singapore.This document is distributed in the United Kingdom by China International Capital Corporation (UK) Limited (“CICCUK”), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The investments and services to which this document relates are only available to persons of a kind described in Article 19 (5), 38, 47 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. This document is not intended for retail clients. In other EEA countries, the document is issued to persons regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) in their home jurisdiction.This document will be made available in other jurisdictions pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations in those particular jurisdictions.

Special Disclosures

CICC may have positions in, and may effect transactions in securities of companies mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform investment banking services for those companies. Investors should be aware that CICC and/or its associated persons may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this document. Investors should not solely reply on the opinions contained in this document when making any investment decision or other decisions.

Disclosures in relation to the Companies contained this document could be found at https://research.cicc.com/footer/disclosures, or in the published latest company-specific research. Distribution of ratings is available at https://research.cicc.com/footer/disclosures.

Explanation of stock ratings: “BUY”, the stock is expected to provide an absolute return of 20% or more; “HOLD ”, the stock is expected to provide an absolute return of -10%~20%; “SELL”, the stock is expected to the stock to provide an absolute return of -10% and below.

Explanation of sector ratings: Analyst expects a sector rated “OVERWEIGHT” to outperform the market by 10% or more, “EQUAL-WEIGHT” to end up between 10% below and 10% above the market, and “UNDERWEIGHT” to fall behind the market by 10% or more, over the next 6~12 months.

Copyright of this document belongs to CICC. Any form of unauthorized distribution, reproduction, publication, release or quotation is prohibited without CICC’s written permission.

Page 44: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

US Regulatory Disclosures

Analyst Certification

The analysts who prepared the research contained herein hereby certify pursuant to Regulation AC of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") that: (i) the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my personal views about the subject securities and issuers; and (ii) no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research

report.

Foreign Broker-Dealer Disclosure

This research report was prepared by China International Capital Corporation Limited and China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited (hereinafter "CICC"), a company authorized to engage in securities activities in United States. CICC is not a registered broker-dealer in the United States and, therefore, is not subject to U.S. rules regarding the preparation of research reports and the independence of research

analysts. This research report is provided for distribution to “major U.S. institutional investors” in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 15a-6 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Any U.S. recipient of this research report wishing to effect any transaction to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments based on the information provided in this research report should do so only through CICC US Securities, Inc. (hereinafter "CICC US"), a registered broker-dealer in the United States. Under no circumstances should any recipient of this research report effect any transaction to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments through CICC. CICC US accepts responsibility for the contents of this research report, subject to the terms set out below, to the extent that it is delivered to a U.S. person

other than a major U.S. institutional investor. The analyst whose name appears in this research report is not registered or qualified as a research analyst with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and may not be an associated person of CICC US and, therefore, may not be subject to applicable restrictions under FINRA Rules on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a

research analyst account.

Page 45: Deal or No Deal? Trade War Scenario Outlook · 2019-09-17 · Overall growth: largely stable despite high volatility for monthly path Source: CEIC, CICC Research 8 4 6 8 10 12 14

Index Definitions:

MSCI China Index: captures large and mid cap representation across China H shares, B shares, Red chips and P chips.

MSCI All China Investable Market Index (IMI): captures large, mid and small cap representation across all China securities that are listed in China and Hong Kong, the US and in Singapore. The index includes: A-Shares, H shares, B shares, Red chips and P chips as well as China securities that are listed on the NYSE Euronext (New York), NASDAQ, New York AMEX and Singapore exchanges.

MSCI ACWI Index: captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 23 Emerging Markets (EM) countries.

The MSCI ACWI GDP Weighted Index: is based on the flagship MSCI ACWI Index, its parent index, and includes large and mid cap stocks across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index uses a different weighting scheme than its cap weighted parent index, however. The weight of each country in the index is derived from its economic size (using GDP data) rather than the size of its equity market. Over time, GDP data tends to have more stability than equity market prices.

The MSCI EAFE Index: is an equity index which captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada.

S&P 500 Index: is an American stock market index based on the market capitalizations of 500 large companies having common stock listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index: captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Emerging Markets (EM) countries.

The MSCI USA Index: The MSCI USA Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the US market.

The MSCI Frontier Markets (FM) Index: captures large and mid cap representation across 29 Frontier Markets countries.

The MSCI China A Index: captures large and mid cap representation across China securities listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges.

The MSCI China A International Index: is a free-float adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is designed to track the equity market performance of large-cap and mid-cap Chinese securities listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. The Index is based on the concept of the integrated MSCI China equity universe with mainland Chinese securities included.

The MSCI United Arab Emirates (UAE) Index: designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the UAE market.

CSI 300 Index: consists of the 300 largest and most liquid A-share stocks. The Index aims to reflect the overall performance of China A-share market..

45