Data Committee Meeting Agenda - michigan.gov · 6.2. – Status of Submitted Asset Management Plans...
Transcript of Data Committee Meeting Agenda - michigan.gov · 6.2. – Status of Submitted Asset Management Plans...
Data Committee Members: Committee Chair: Bill McEntee, CRA – Vice Chair: Dave Wresinski,
MDOT – Jon Start, MTPA – Bob Slattery, MML – Jennifer Tubbs, MTA – Rob Surber, MCSS
Data Committee Meeting Agenda
Wednesday, November 29, 2017 @ 1:00PM
Michigan Department of Transportation Aeronautics Building
2nd Floor Commission Board Room
2700 Port Lansing Road
Lansing, Michigan
1. Welcome - Call to Order – Introductions
2. Public Comments on Non-Agenda Items
3. Consent Agenda
3.1 Approval of the 10-27-17 Data Committee Meeting Minutes (Action – Attachment 1)
3.2 TAMC Budget Update (Attachment 2)
4. Correspondence & Announcements
4.1. The LTAP Bridge Newsletter Article Update
5. Review & Discussion Items:
5.1. Asset Management Plans
5.1.1. Process Flow Chart Example for Approval Process – Belknap (Attachment 3)
5.1.2. Status of Asset Management Plan Submittals – Belknap (Attachment 4)
5.2. Data Collection Status of 2017 PASER Collection – Belknap (Attachment 5)
5.3. Michigan Tech University – Center for Technology & Training – Colling
5.3.1. MTU Data Collection and Submittal Testing Report – Colling (Attachment 6)
5.3.2. Updates on Training and Workshop schedules – Colling
5.4. Act 51 Reporting and IRT
5.4.1. Investment Reporting and Act 51 Compliance – Belknap (Attachment 7)
5.4.2. IRT-ADARS Software Updates - Holmes
5.4.3. Training Update - Holmes
5.5. Website Update - Holmes
5.6. Dashboard Update - Holmes
5.7. 2018 TAMC Strategic Session – Belknap
6. Work Program
6.1. Prioritize list of assignments from 11-11-17 TAMC meeting – Kent (Attachment 8)
7. Public Comments
8. Member Comments
9. Adjournment
The next TAMC Data Committee Meeting is scheduled for December 27, 2017 at the MDOT
Aeronautics Building, 2nd Floor Commission Room, 2700 Port Lansing Road, Lansing,
Michigan
1
TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT COUNCIL DATA COMMITTEE MEETING
October 25, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. MDOT Aeronautics Building
2700 Port Lansing Road, 2nd Floor Commission Room Lansing, Michigan
MINUTES ** Frequently Used Acronyms Attached Members Present: Bill McEntee, CRA – Chair Jonathan Start, MTPA/KATS Rob Surber, DTMB/CSS Jennifer Tubbs, MTA David Wresinski, MDOT – Vice Chair Support Staff Present: Rob Balmes, MDOT Roger Belknap, MDOT, via Telephone Gil Chesbro, MDOT Mark Holmes, DTMB/CSS Dave Jennett, MDOT Polly Kent, MDOT Josh Ross, DTMB/CSS Gloria Strong, MDOT Cheryl Granger, DTMB/CSS Members Absent: Robert Slattery, MML Public Present: None 1. Welcome - Call-To-Order – Introductions: The meeting was called-to-order at 1:10 p.m.; Cheryl Granger from CSS was introduced to the group as the new TAMC Data Set Project Manager; everyone present was introduced. 2. Public Comments on Non-Agenda Items: None
3. Consent Agenda: 3.1. – Approval of the September 27, 2017 Data Committee Meeting minutes (Action Item) J. Start made a motion to approve the meeting minutes of September 27, 2017; D. Wresinski seconded the motion. The motion was approved by all members present. 3.2. - TAMC Budget Update – R. Belknap
A brief update on the TAMC budget for FY 2017 was provided. There has been a number of invoices that have recently come in that have not yet been included in this spreadsheet.
2
4. Correspondence and Announcements – R. Belknap: 4.1. – Portraits of TAMC Members/Photographer Attending November 1 Meeting
G. Strong has arranged for a photographer to take individual and group photos of the TAMC members and TAMC support staff on November 1, 2017. It will take place in the small conference room on the second floor promptly at 1:00 p.m. The TAMC full council meeting will take place immediately following the photoshoot.
4.2. – LTAP Bridge Newsletter Article D. Jennett has written an article regarding the TAMC Investment Reporting Tool (IRT) and submitted it to Vicki Sage at Michigan Technological University (MTU) for her review and editing for the December issue. The Bridge Committee will do the next article. 4.3. – Roadsoft Users Conference of the United States (RUCUS) November 1, Lansing Crowne Plaza D. Jennett, along with Mike Toth (MDOT), Melissa Carswell (MDOT), and Mark Holmes (DTMB/CSS) will be giving presentations on the Michigan Hour at the November 1, 2017 RUCUS Conference in Lansing. TAMC support staff and MDOTers will be reporting on Model Inventory of Roadway Elements (MIRE), Traffic Counts, Michigan Geographic Framework, Requests for Proposals (RFPs) process, and IRT updates. Joanna Johnson, TAMC Chair, will be present to represent TAMC. D. Jennett and R. Belknap has been asked by Gareth Lifton, KPMG and Michigan 21st Century Infrastructure Pilots Program Leader, to give their IRT presentation that they did at the TAMC Fall Conference on October 5, 2017, at an Infrastructure Pilot Project meeting on October 30. D. Jennett will give an IRT demonstration.
5. Work Program: 5.1. – TAMC FY 2017-2019 Work Program Update – P. Kent P. Kent will provide a detailed update on the progress of the TAMC Work Program at the November 1, 2017 TAMC full Council meeting. Some items have been completed, and others are ongoing. P. Kent suggested designating any work items specific to each committee and discussing those tasks at their individual committee meetings.
5.2. – Annual Report Update – R. Belknap R. Belknap reported that TAMC support staff has started the process of creating the next TAMC Annual Report. A draft of the newly formatted 2017 TAMC Annual Report has been created and will be shared at the November 1, 2017, TAMC ACE and full Council meetings. D. Jennett has created a mock Table of Content that he will also share. There are early discussions on PASER forecasting analysis and process. Support staff has made an overall Annual Report timeline.
3
6. Review and Discussion Items: 6.1. - Data Collection Status of 2017 Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) Collection – R. Belknap R. Belknap showed a map of submitted PASER data by regions. 45 counties have uploaded their data into the IRT. There are 26 agencies that have PASER collection completed-QA/QC in progress; 9 PASER collections in progress, and 3 PASER collections scheduled. 6.2. – Status of Submitted Asset Management Plans – R. Belknap R. Belknap presented a list of the agencies that have submitted Asset Management Plans as of October 18, 2017. Of the 66 plans that have been submitted over the years, 32 are still current, and 34 are expired. All but one of the expired plans were submitted by cities or villages, possibly in response to the Act 51 requirement that they submit a plan in order to be able to move funds to local roads. With TAMC agreement to add the ability to voluntarily submit plans through the IRT, some additional plans have been submitted recently. J. Tubbs had concerns that TAMC should not be handling asset management plans as the Council is not mandated by law to collect them. MDOT, however, is required to approve asset management plans from cities and villages wishing to shift funds to local roads. R. Belknap provides Lori Cole, MDOT, with a list of the agencies that have submitted approved asset management plans, in response to inquiries from Finance related to the Act 51 requirement. He does this as an MDOT employee, not on behalf of TAMC. TAMC support staff have created a checklist for asset management plans to determine compliance with the Act 51 requirement, and use this checklist when reviewing the submitted plans. R. Belknap also shared a list of investment reporting files, asset management plans, and miscellaneous items that have been submitted recently. These await review by TAMC support staff. J. Start expressed a concern about having enough TAMC support staff to review the plans. P. Kent will review staff availability and recommend a plan to keep up on the review of asset management plans voluntarily submitted through the IRT. Currently, there are not enough plans being submitted to create a problem. 6.3. - Michigan Tech University – Center for Technology and Training – T. Colling T. Colling was unavailable to report today. D. Jennett reported that the Asset Management workshop held yesterday went very well and was very informative. There was concern expressed about a legislative proposal not to continue to fund LTAPS. T. Colling informed D. Jennett that this will not have an impact on TAMC as they are under contract with TAMC. This matter will be on next week’s TAMC full Council agenda. Tracie Leix, MDOT Local Agency Program Engineer, will give an update.
6.4. – Act 51 Reporting and IRT –
6.4.1. – Investment Reporting and Act 51 Compliance – R. Belknap/D. Jennett Maps were provided showing the status of where agencies are in the review. For 2016, of 564 agencies submitting, only 44 agencies that need small adjustments in order to be compliant. For 2017, of 121 agencies submitting, 65 need to submit additional information to be in compliance.
4
6.4.2. – IRT-ADARS Software Updates – R. Belknap/D. Jennett M. Holmes reported that Josh Ross and Cheryl Granger, CSS Program Manager, have taken over this task. Some of the items that have been backlogged are now being worked on as part of the 2018 tasks. They are working on an IRT version 2.3. and improving the PASER data upload. B. McEntee reported that the PASER data uploads are one of the things CSS will look at by placing a notification on the home page and placing an automatic date stamp when an agency uploads PASER data. An issue that was recently noted is when an agency sends their data to their region, then the region enters the data in the IRT to the Council, it has been taking some time for it to be entered. Also, once the region has entered the data, it takes a few minutes for the region to get notification from the system that their data was not uploaded properly. There should be some notice that the upload is still in process and has not been uploaded, and the region will need to check back to assure the data was uploaded. It was suggested that an email giving information as to whether or not it was successfully uploaded be sent to the agency, region, and MPO to make everyone aware of the issue. 6.4.3. – Training Update – J. Ross CSS is scheduling five (5) off-site and 5 Webinars for training. J. Ross developed potential dates and locations; the 5 off-site trainings have been scheduled. Regions want to do the training before they go out and do field collection, so the Webinars will be done before early spring. It was suggested to hold off on scheduling the last two (2) trainings to catch any problems that the regions are noticing and they can be addressed in the last 2 Webinars. ACE Committee will need to review the schedule and give a recommendation to full council to approve the schedule. J. Ross will send the schedule to R. Belknap to add to the November 1, 2017 TAMC full Council agenda by Friday, October 27.
6.5. – Website Update – M. Holmes The TAMC Website was moved to a Vignette platform on October 6, 2017, however, all of the information from the old platform has not been migrated to the new platform. The move to Vignette will allow for MDOT and CSS staff to do much quicker updates and also gather feedback and Website usage information from Google Analytics. R. Belknap, D. Jennett, and G. Strong attended training for Vignette on October 13, 2017. CSS will complete the migration of information from the old platform to Vignette and continue to do updates until TAMC support staff are comfortable with doing the updates. 6.6. – Dashboard Update – M. Holmes The new IRT training videos and new interactive map have been uploaded. CSS questioned whether or not TAMC would like the IRT planned projects which are on a non-public map to be made public? After discussion, the committee agreed that this information should be made public. It also agreed to make townships visible in the IRT and the interactive map. The committee agreed that agencies would like to share their project information and be as
5
transparent as possible. Most agencies already have a program that shows their completed projects. The older projects will need to be removed and just show the last three to five years of information. A suggestion was made to possibly do a survey of the agencies to see how they feel about sharing their project information, but committee members did not think this was necessary. The committee also discussed showing township geographical boundaries in the IRT. Currently, road ownerships are not listed and if it is not a public road it states “unknown.” The committee agreed to change “unknown” to state “not a certified public road.” CSS is working towards putting in actual ownership information. CSS has entered a toggle that shows agencies only the roads that they own. CSS will also need to show routine maintenance information for all roads, whether they are township, city, or county owned. They will have to figure out how this will be shown on a map. The recommendations to make three years of planned construction projects available to the public was moved by J. Start and seconded by J. Tubbs. The motion was approved by all members present and will be forwarded to full Council.
7. Public Comments: None 8. Member Comments: J. Tubbs suggested either moving agenda item #6 - Review and Discussion Items, up on the agenda to ahead of agenda item #4 – Correspondence and Announcements, to allow the committee more time to discuss important issues. If time allows, Correspondence and Announcements can be done or if time is running short, the committee can be updated at the full Council meetings as these items are also on their agenda each month. 9. Adjournment: J. Tubbs made a motion to adjourn the meeting; D. Wresinski seconded the motion. The motion was approved by all members present. The meeting adjourned at 3:03 p.m.. The next meeting will be held November 29, 2017, at 1:00 p.m., MDOT Aeronautics Building, 2nd Floor Commission Conference Room, Lansing.
6
TAMC FREQUENTLY USED ACRONYMS:AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS
ACE ADMINISTRATION, COMMUNICATION, AND EDUCATION (TAMC COMMITTEE)
ACT‐51 PUBLIC ACT 51 OF 1951‐DEFINITION: A CLASSIFICATION SYTEM DESIGNED TO DISTRIBUTE MICHIGAN’S ACT 51 FUNDS. A ROADWAY MUST BE CLASSIFIED ON THE ACT 51 LIST TO RECEIVE STATE MONEY.
ADARS ACT 51 DISTRIBUTION AND REPORTING SYSTEM
BTP BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (MDOT)
CPM CAPITAL PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
CRA COUNTY ROAD ASSOCIATION (OF MICHIGAN)
CSD CONTRACT SERVICES DIVISION (MDOT)
CSS CENTER FOR SHARED SOLUTIONS
DI DISTRESS INDEX
ESC EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE
FAST FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT
FHWA FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
FOD FINANCIAL OPERATIONS DIVISION (MDOT)
FY FISCAL YEAR
GLS REGION V GENESEE‐LAPEER‐SHIAWASSEE REGION V PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
GVMC GRAND VALLEY METRO COUNCIL
HPMS HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM
IBR INVENTORY BASED RATING
IRI INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX
IRT INVESTMENT REPORTING TOOL
KATS KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY
KCRC KENT COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
LDC LAPTOP DATA COLLECTORS
LTAP LOCAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
MAC MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
MAP‐21 MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY (ACT)
MAR MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF REGIONS
MDOT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MDTMB MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
MITA MICHIGAN INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION
MML MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
MPO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
MTA MICHIGAN TOWNSHIPS ASSOCIATION
MTF MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
MTPA MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ASSOCIATION
MTU MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
NBI NATIONAL BRIDGE INVENTORY
NBIS NATIONAL BRIDGE INSPECTION STANDARDS
NFA NON‐FEDERAL AID
NFC NATIONAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
NHS NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
PASER PAVEMENT SURFACE EVALUATION AND RATING
PNFA PAVED NON‐FEDERAL AID
PWA PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
QA/QC QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
7
RCKC ROAD COMMISSION OF KALAMAZOO COUNTY
ROW RIGHT‐OF‐WAY
RPA REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY
RPO REGIONAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION
RUCUS ROADSOFT USERS CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES
SEMCOG SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
STC STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
STP STATE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
TAMC TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
TAMCSD TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT COUNCIL SUPPORT DIVISION
TAMP TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
TPM TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES
UWP UNIFIED WORK PROGRAMS:/GLORIASTRONG/TAMC FREQUENTLY USED ACRONYMS.10.2017.GMS
As of 11‐21‐17 Financial Report FY15‐FY17
FY15 Budget FY15 Actual FY16 Budget FY16 Actual FY17 Budget
(most recent invoice date) $ Spent $ Spent $ Spent Balance
I. Data Collection (Federal‐Aid System) & Regional‐Metro Planning Asset Management Progam
Battle Creek Area Transporation Study 8/15/17 20,000.00$ 11,450.94$ 20,000.00$ 9,774.58$ 20,000.00$ 6,673.27$ 13,326.73$
Bay County Area Transportation Study 20,000.00$ 9,620.95$ 20,000.00$ 6,988.87$ 20,000.00$ ‐$ 20,000.00$
Central Upper Peninsula Planning and Development FINAL 40,471.00$ 40,471.00$ 40,471.00$ 40,471.00$ 40,471.00$ 40,471.00$ ‐$
East Michigan Council of Governments FINAL 95,995.00$ 95,995.00$ 95,995.00$ 95,995.00$ 95,995.00$ 80,092.75$ 15,902.25$
Eastern Upper Peninsula Regional Planning & Devel. FINAL 20,000.00$ 20,000.15$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ ‐$
Genesee Lapeer Shiawasse Region V Planning Com. 9/15/17 39,423.00$ 36,599.95$ 39,423.00$ 39,026.20$ 39,423.00$ 9,355.05$ 30,067.95$
Grand Valley Metropolitan Council FINAL 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 4,837.31$ 20,000.00$ 18,974.64$ 1,025.36$
Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study 8/17/17 20,000.00$ 16,434.05$ 20,000.00$ 12,024.73$ 20,000.00$ 14,545.38$ 5,454.62$
Macatawa Area Coordinating Council FINAL 20,000.00$ 1,598.50$ 20,000.00$ 3,910.09$ 20,000.00$ 7,405.66$ 12,594.34$
Midland Area Transportation Study FINAL 20,000.00$ 17,709.01$ 20,000.00$ 19,068.43$ 20,000.00$ 17,660.54$ 2,339.46$
Northeast Michigan Council of Governments FINAL 37,916.00$ 37,916.00$ 37,916.00$ 37,916.00$ 43,426.45$ 43,426.45$ ‐$
Northwest Michigan Council of Governments 8/2/17 61,316.00$ 61,316.00$ 61,316.00$ 61,316.00$ 61,316.00$ 37,064.81$ 24,251.19$
Region 2 Planning Commission 8/2/17 37,940.00$ 13,509.54$ 37,940.00$ 16,714.49$ 37,940.00$ 15,162.07$ 22,777.93$
Saginaw County Metropolitan Plannning Commission 20,000.00$ 16,975.33$ 20,000.00$ 7,172.10$ 20,000.00$ ‐$ 20,000.00$
Southcentral Michigan Planning Commission 9/15/17 53,162.00$ 35,879.53$ 53,162.00$ 31,370.58$ 53,162.00$ 33,931.37$ 19,230.63$
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments FINAL 135,680.00$ 37,030.00$ 135,680.00$ 88,357.55$ 135,680.00$ 135,679.60$ 0.40$
Southwest Michigan Planning Commission FINAL 37,030.00$ 32,396.00$ 37,030.00$ 37,029.76$ 37,030.00$ 37,030.00$ ‐$
Tri‐County Regional Planning Commission FINAL 33,786.00$ 33,646.28$ 33,786.00$ 14,081.44$ 33,786.00$ 33,786.00$ ‐$
West Michigan Regional Planning Commission FINAL 82,467.00$ 54,650.62$ 82,467.00$ 54,674.06$ 82,467.00$ 82,467.00$ ‐$
West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Com. FINAL 46,781.56$ 38,158.62$ 46,781.56$ 47,181.18$ 46,781.56$ 46,145.01$ 636.55$
Western Upper Peninsula Regional Planning & Devel. 8/7/17 34,867.00$ 34,867.00$ 34,867.00$ 34,867.00$ 34,867.00$ 21,431.17$ 13,435.83$
MDOT Region Participation & PASER Quality Control 9/30/17 185,191.00$ 62,177.00$ 88,000.00$ 22,702.00$ 62,750.00$ 85,337.50$ (22,587.50)$
Fed. Aid Data Collection & RPO/MPO Program Total 1,082,025.56$ 728,401.47$ 984,834.56$ 705,478.37$ 965,095.01$ 786,639.27$ 178,455.74$
II. 2017 PASER Data Collection (Paved, Non‐Federal‐Aid System)
Road Commission of Kalamazoo County ‐ 285.40 miles KATS 3,324.91$ ‐$ 3,324.91$
City of St. Clair Shores ‐ 160.00 miles SEMCOG Jackson CRC 9,201.47$ Marquette CRC 5,130.33$ 1,864.00$ 1,864.00$ ‐$
Kent County Road Commission ‐ 752.36 miles GVMC Port Huron 1,176.66$ St. Joseph CRC 2,647.68$ 8,764.99$ 8,764.99$ ‐$
Washtenaw County Road Commission ‐ 429.66 miles SEMCOG Harper Woods 439.08$ Presque Isle CRC 1,570.78$ 5,005.49$ 5,005.49$ ‐$
City of Novi ‐ 152.00 miles SEMCOG Whitehall 221.35$ Mount Morris ‐$ 1,770.80$ 1,770.80$ ‐$
Lapeer County Road Commission ‐ 239.28 miles GLS R V Montague 198.05$ Allegan CRC ‐$ 2,787.61$ ‐$ 2,787.61$
City of Flushing ‐ 26.95 miles GLS R V North Muskegon 209.70$ GVMC Urban Cities ‐$ 313.97$ ‐$ 313.97$
City of Lincoln Park ‐ 116.10 miles SEMCOG Tawas City 209.64$ Tuscola CRC 2,854.25$ 1,352.57$ 1,352.57$ ‐$
Manistee County Road Commission ‐ 243.00 miles NWMCOG Van Buren CRC 7,076.68$ 2,830.95$ ‐$ 2,830.95$
Oscoda County Road Commission ‐ 93.00 miles NEMCOG 1,083.45$ ‐$ 1,083.45$
Otsego County Road Commission ‐ 298.00 miles NEMCOG 3,471.70$ ‐$ 3,471.70$
City of Iron River ‐ 41.00 miles WUPPDR 477.65$ ‐$ 477.65$
Alpena County Road Commission ‐ 82.00 miles NEMCOG 955.30$ ‐$ 955.30$
Monroe County Road Commission ‐ 580.00 miles SEMCOG 6,757.00$ 6,757.00$ ‐$
2017 PASER PNFA Data Collection Total 13,808.96$ 11,655.95$ 36,780.33$ 19,279.72$ 40,760.39$ 25,514.85$ 15,245.54$
III. TAMC Central Data Agency (MCSS)
Project Mgmt 9/30/17 37,800.00$ 37,800.00$ 36,862.00$ 37,800.00$ $40,064.00 ($2,264.00)
Data Support 9/30/17 60,200.00$ 60,200.00$ 58,343.00$ 60,200.00$ $58,833.00 $1,367.00
Application Development / Maintenance / Testing 9/30/17 50,880.00$ 83,280.00$ 104,221.50$ 83,280.00$ $78,238.00 $5,042.00
Help Desk / Misc Support 9/30/17 81,300.00$ 66,600.00$ 75,162.00$ 66,600.00$ $65,652.00 $948.00
Training 9/30/17 19,800.00$ 27,600.00$ 26,761.50$ 27,600.00$ $29,133.00 ($1,533.00)
Data Access / Reporting 9/30/17 36,000.00$ 47,155.00$ 29,898.25$ 47,155.00$ $45,696.00 $1,459.00
Off Budget: Investment Reporting Tool Re‐write ‐ $241,000 9/30/17 15,000.00$ ‐$ 241,040.00$ 260,023.00$ (18,983.00)$
TAMC Central Data Agency (MCSS) Total 285,980.00$ 263,500.00$ 337,635.00$ 331,248.25$ 322,635.00$ 317,616.00$ 5,019.00$
IV. TAMC Training & Education (MTU) Calendar Year Z13 10/25/17 177,909.00$ 171,696.00$ 176,133.44$ 176,133.00$ 210,000.00$ 136,235.83$ 73,764.17$
V. TAMC Activities (MTU) Z10 10/25/17 99,345.00$ 99,345.00$ 99,980.00$ 95,543.00$ 70,000.00$ 55,700.12$ 14,299.88$
VI. TAMC Expenses
Fall Conference Expenses 3/31/17 n/a n/a 6,000.00$ 6,141.00$ 6,000.00$ 8,312.40$
Fall Conf. Attendence Fees + sponsorship Fees 3/31/17 n/a n/a n/a n/a ‐$ 2,625.00$
Net Fall Conference 3/31/17 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,625.00$ 8,312.40$ 312.60$
Spring Conference Expenses 7/11/17 n/a n/a 8,000.00$ 6,320.99$ 8,000.00$ 6,721.80$
Spring Conf. Attendence Fees + sponsorship Fees 7/11/17 n/a n/a n/a n/a ‐$ 6,140.00$
Net Spring Conference 7/11/17 n/a n/a n/a n/a 14,140.00$ 6,721.80$ 7,418.20$
Other Council Expenses 9/30/17 n/a n/a 2,286.23$ 3,589.01$ 3,915.29$ 8,483.24$ (4,567.95)$
TAMC Expenses Total 8,330.00$ 20,733.00$ 16,286.23$ 16,051.00$ 26,680.29$ 23,517.44$ 3,162.85$
Total Program 1,667,398.52$ 1,295,331.42$ 1,651,649.56$ 1,343,733.34$ 1,635,170.69$ 1,027,607.51$ 289,947.18$
Appropriation 1,626,400.00$ 331,068.58$ 1,626,400.00$ 282,666.66$ 1,626,400.00$
FY17 Year to Date
2015 PNFA Program 2016 PNFA Program
1 of 1
Local agency adopts a formal Asset Management Plan
Local Agency or RPO/MPO uploads Asset Management Plan into the TAMC Investment Reporting Tool (IRT) as
part of annual Investment Reporting required under MCL Section 247.659a(7)
When Local Agency is a County
When Local Agency is a City/Village
TAMC Coordinator inquires if Local agency seeking to shift
Major Street funds to Local funds under PA 338 of 2006 RPO/MPO has access to Plan via IRT
RPO/MPO reports on status of
all local agency plans under
Unified Work Program
Local agency plans should be
consulted and used in
prioritization of Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP)
development
RPO/MPO provides support
when applicable to assist local
agencies in achieving plan goals
as well as regional road/bridge
condition goals
Local agency says No Local agency says Yes
TAMC Coordinator reviews plan for content and determines if
plan meets TAMC guidelines and objectives per TAMC templates;
local agency may revise and resubmit plan to satisfy objectives
Plans become Transportation Resources
TAMC Coordinator reports
status of plans to TAMC monthly
TAMC reports on status of local
agency Asset Management Plans
as part of Michigan Roads and
Bridges Annual Report
Goals and objectives from Local
agency plans are analyzed
against system performance to
determine Best Management
Practices
Once a plan is approved by TAMC Coordinator, working on
behalf of MDOT, approval notice is provided to the Local agency,
the Act 51 Team at MDOT and the appropriate RPO/MPO
TAMC, partner agencies and industry associations are better
equipped to inform the Michigan Legislature, State
Transportation Commission and the general public of the
conditions and needs of the state’s collective transportation
infrastructure; dashboards and case studies are shared and
provide transparency.
Transportation agencies are managing bridges and pavements
according to an Asset Management process as required by Act
51, enhanced through a formal Asset Management Plan
development, which in turn, provides the highest return on
investment.
OUTCOMES
Pursuant to Public Act 51, the intent of this flow chart is to document the process of transportation agencies’ submittals
of Asset Management Plans, navigating from the local agency to the Transportation Asset Management Council, through
the regional and metropolitan planning agencies and ultimately to the Michigan Legislature and citizens of Michigan.
DRAFT 11-20-2017
As of 11‐22‐17
Asset Management Plans Submitted Directly to TAMC Support Staff
AGENCY DATE
SUBMITTEDEXPIRATION DATE
Miles
Owned by
Agency
TOP 125
Cities & Villages
City of Adrian 12/6/11 12/31/18 73.53 NO
City of Ann Arbor 1/23/17 1/23/19 296.83 YES
City of Auburn Hills 12/31/13 12/31/18 70.77 NO
City of Battle Creek 6/14/06 12/31/12 294.68 YES
City of Beaverton 2/27/07 2/27/12 7.45 NO
City of Bloomfield Hills* DRAFT DRAFT 28 NO
City of Carson City 5/5/11 12/31/15 10.76 NO
City of ColdWater 4/10/17 4/10/19 58.5 NO
City of Dearborn 6/22/09 12/31/13 267.56 YES
City of DeWitt 7/1/06 12/31/16 22.15 NO
City of Eastpoint 10/1/13 10/1/18 99.78 NO
City of Eaton Rapids 7/17/13 12/31/16 27.5 NO
City of Essexville 1/1/09 12/31/14 17.77 NO
City of Fraser 8/29/07 12/31/09 42.6 NO
City of Garden City 3/3/14 3/3/19 101.02 YES
City of Grand Rapids 7/25/17 7/31/20 597 YES
City of Grosse Pointe Woods 8/14/09 8/14/14 55.39 NO
City of Hamtramck 9/23/15 9/23/18 36.76 NO
City of Holland 4/5/13 4/5/18 149.08 YES
City of Ionia 7/1/05 7/1/10 26.51 NO
City of Keego Harbor 5/21/09 12/31/13 8.87 NO
City of Kentwood 2/17/15 12/31/20 147.11 YES
City of Lansing 6/25/07 12/31/12 410.8 YES
City of Lincoln Park 4/11/14 4/11/19 115.59 YES
City of Livonia 4/1/13 12/31/17 371.61 YES
City of Madison Heights 11/2/06 12/31/11 95.71 NO
City of Manistee 9/3/09 12/31/17 49.21 NO
City of Marquette Pre‐2008 12/31/07 90.42 NO
City of Monroe 2/13/09 12/31/09 82.71 NO
City of Montague 4/5/13 12/31/13 24.68 NO
City of New Baltimore 5/23/07 5/23/12 40.46 NO
City of Newaygo 5/18/10 12/31/11 19.78 NO
City of Northville 6/5/13 12/31/23 24.89 NO
City of Norton Shores * DRAFT '17 UPDATE FROM 2011 PLAN 148.93 YES
City of Plainwell 11/20/14 11/20/19 19.92 NO
City of Richmond 3/10/17 3/10/19 17.87 NO
City of Rockwood 5/15/17 5/15/19 11.52 NO
City of Romeo 2/20/10 12/31/12 12.92 NO
City of Romulus 10/31/06 12/31/10 113.95 YES
City of Roseville 6/28/07 12/31/17 128.67 YES
City of Royal Oak* 2014 PLAN OF ACTION ‐ MILLAGE DOC 214 YES
1 of 2
As of 11‐22‐17
Asset Management Plans Submitted Directly to TAMC Support Staff
AGENCY DATE
SUBMITTEDEXPIRATION DATE
Miles
Owned by
Agency
TOP 125
City of Saginaw 6/24/14 6/24/19 278.63 YES
City of Saline 1/17/13 1/17/18 34.82 NO
City of St. Clair 10/1/08 10/1/13 29.18 NO
City of Taylor 3/1/09 12/31/12 193.94 YES
City of Wakefield 9/10/07 12/31/12 37.55 NO
City of Walled Lake 3/4/05 3/4/10 18.09 NO
City of Wayne 12/14/04 12/14/09 57.08 NO
City of Westland 6/21/05 6/21/10 209.98 YES
City of Whitehall 2/1/11 12/31/20 26.07 NO
City of Wixom 7/25/17 7/31/20 47 NO
City of Zilwaukee 5/18/11 12/31/20 11.99 NO
Village of Caledonia 11/19/10 12/31/12 7.5 NO
Village of Decatur 8/7/14 8/7/19 14.91 NO
Village of Diamondale 3/10/08 12/31/13 6.41 NO
Village of Lake Isabella 11/19/10 12/31/11 26.26 NO
Village of Maybee 3/24/05 3/24/10 5.16 NO
Village of Shelby 2/1/12 12/31/16 13.6 NO
Village of Springport 10/24/06 12/31/10 3.28 NO
Village of Wolverine 4/11/17 4/11/19 7.2 NO
55 Approved Plans (33 expired) 5461.91
*5 Plans in Draft form not yet approved (3 from Top 125 Agencies)
14 Approved Plans from Top 125 Agencies (6 expired)
Counties
CRC Dickenson County 7/8/13 7/8/18 515.84 YES
CRC Eaton County 7/17/13 12/31/16 1173.38 YES
CRC Emmet County 6/18/13 6/18/18 832.01 YES
CRC Grand Traverse 6/30/16 6/30/20 1015.17 YES
CRC Kalamazoo County 8/9/17 (periodical updates) 1266.72 YES
CRC Kent County 8/31/16 8/31/26 1993.23 YES
CRC Mecosta County 8/14/13 8/14/18 1133.21 YES
CRC Ogemaw County 9/30/13 9/30/18 834.63 YES
CRC Washtenaw County 8/1/13 8/1/18 1653.19 YES
9 County Plans (1 expired) 10417.38
Every County is in Top 125 Agencies
2 of 2
IRON
DELTA
LUCE
CHIPPEWA
KENT
MARQUETTE ALGERGOGEBIC
BAYHURON
SANILAC
LAKE
BARAGA
IONIA
ONTONAGON
MACKINAC
OAKLAND
CASS
ALLEGAN
WAYNE
HOUGHTON
IOSCO
SAGINAW
EATON
CLARE
TUSCOLA
ALCONA
NEWAYGO
BARRY
LAPEER
SCHOOLCRAFT
LENAWEE
ST. CLAIR
JACKSON
ALPENA
CALHOUN
INGHAM
DICKINSON
OTTAWA
MASON
ANTRIM
GENESEE
EMMET
OSCODA
CLINTON
GRATIOT
BERRIEN
OCEANA
MONTCALM
OGEMAW
MONROEBRANCH
OTSEGO
ISABELLA
OSCEOLA
MIDLANDMECOSTA
HILLSDALE
WEXFORD
GLADWIN
WASHTENAW
KALKASKA
MANISTEE
VAN BUREN
MACOMB
MISSAUKEE
CRAWFORDBENZIE
PRESQUE ISLE
ST. JOSEPH
ARENAC
MENOMINEECHEBOYGAN
LIVINGSTON
KALAMAZOO
MUSKEGON
ROSCOMMON
SHIAWASSEE
MONTMORENCYLEELANAU
CHARLEVOIX
KEWEENAW
GRAND TRAVERSE
7
9
81
1213 11
4
14
3
10
2
56
2017 - PASER Status by County As of November 22· Map indicates completion status of TAMC sponsored Federal Aid PASER Data Collection as reported by Regional Planning AgencyCoordinators. Data also includes updates from previous calls and from quarterly reports found with invoices and IRT files uploaded up to November 22, 2017.
PASER Data Uploaded to IRT- QA/QC CompletedPASER Collection Completed-QA/QC in progress
PASER Collection in ProgressMichigan Planning Region Boundary
www.Michigan.gov/TAMC
Map created by RAB, 11-22-17
91856
1
Belknap, Roger (MDOT)
From: Timothy Colling <[email protected]>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 9:10 AMTo: Belknap, Roger (MDOT)Cc: Mary CraneSubject: Data TestingAttachments: TAMC Data Collection and Submittal Testing Report final.pdf
Roger, Attached is the TAMC data collection and submittal testing report for 2017. The testing did not result in any concerns for the interface of data between Roadsoft and the IRT. Please note that it was not possible to test Inventory based rating (IBR) data transfer since the infrastructure is not in place at the IRT to receive the data. We expect to test IBR data transfer early in 2018 before data collection starts, since IBR data will be mandatory in 2018. I would be glad to go over this at the next data committee meeting. Since we have done this several times now I anticipate just verbally reviewing the report rather than making a presentation. Tim Tim Colling PhD., P.E. Director – Center for Technology & Training Michigan Tech University Houghton, MI 49931 (906)487‐2102
Prepared by:
TAMC PASER and Investment Data Collection Process Testing between Roadsoft and the Investment Reporting Tool
Mary Crane Center for Technology & Training
Tim Colling, PhD, PE Center for Technology & Training
September 29, 2017
1.0 BACKGROUND Each year in Michigan, transportation agencies are required to collect and send data to the Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council (TAMC). Local agencies transfer their collected data to the TAMC via regional/metropolitan planning organizations (RPO/MPO) and the Center for Shared Solutions (CSS). The TAMC collects Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) condition data and inventory data as well as investment reporting data for current and planned road and bridge construction projects.
The TAMC uses Roadsoft—a roadway management system for collecting, storing, and analyzing data—for collecting PASER data each year. Roadsoft was created by Michigan Technological University’s Center for Technology & Training (CTT) and is used by many agencies to track road and bridge construction (investment) data. PASER and investment reporting data are uploaded to the TAMC by using the Investment Reporting Tool (IRT), created by CSS. Both Roadsoft and the IRT are living products that have been changing over the years to adapt to the needs of users. Easy, cost-effective data collection and sharing depends on the ability of Roadsoft and the IRT to handle changes to data collection efforts.
In order to validate the reliability of data transfer, the TAMC has asked CSS and CTT staff to test data transfer protocols on an annual basis in order to ensure accurate and complete data. This year’s testing was of specific importance because of significant changes made to the IRT during 2017 due to a routine update of the program. Testing consisted of passing fabricated datasets through Roadsoft to the IRT and comparing the results between what was sent and what was received. This testing process does not verify the validity of the submitted data, but it does verify that what was submitted remains consistent through the process. The CTT would like to thank the staff at the CSS for their cooperation and assistance in the testing related to this report.
2.0 METHODS
Two tests were performed to verify datasets passed from Roadsoft to the IRT. The first test checked PASER condition and inventory data, and the second test checked investment reporting data.
2.1 PASER Data Tests
Two trial datasets were created containing several different surface types, number of lanes and PASER scores. The datasets passed through the entire data handling process outlined in Figure 1 (below). At each transition between systems, the data sent was compared to the data received in order to verify that no change or loss of information occurred. The PASER data test simulated the worst-case scenario of dataset transfers between local agencies, regions, and the State. Inventory Based Rating (IBR) data for unpaved roads was not formally tested during this round of assessment, because the infrastructure to accept IBR data is not currently in place in the IRT. This testing will take place early in 2018 prior to data collection when IRB data will be mandatory.
The counties of Lapeer and Tuscola were chosen as the surrogates for this test because they share border roads that are paved Federal-aid highways. According to data collection rules, these border roads could potentially be collected in both counties. Further complicating the data collection, these two
counties belong to different planning regions so data for these border roads could be submitted by different region coordinators. After each step of the data handling procedure, visual and numerical comparisons of the data were performed.
Figure 1: PASER Data Collection Process
The tested data transfers that are detailed in this report include:
• Transfer of a local agency’s Roadsoft database to the LDC (Figure 1: Step 4) • Transfer of the LDC database back to the local agency’s copy of Roadsoft (Figure 1: Step 7) • Transfer of the local agency’s Roadsoft database to the Region’s copy of Roadsoft (Figure 1: Step
9) • Transfer of the Region’s Roadsoft database to IRT (Figure 1: Step 10) • Final results from the IRT processing at CSS and the expected results
Prior to testing, an empty database was created for each county. The project team populated these databases, using the local agency version of Roadsoft, with a randomly chosen network of roads in each county along with a border road shared in both counties (see Figures 2 and 3). Each test set contained roads of each pavement type as well as unpaved roads. After exporting each road network to the LDC, the project team edited rating and inventory data in the LDC following the normal field collection procedures. The characteristics of the test data for Lapeer and Tuscola counties are:
2.1.1 Lapeer County test data
Total centerline miles defined: 13.753 Asphalt: 1.515 (Rated 7, 8, 9) Composite: 4.058 (Rated 4, 5, 6, 7) Concrete: 2.273 (Rated 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) Sealcoat: 2.271 (Rated 2, 6, 7, 9) Brick: 1.405 (Rated 6, 8) Gravel: 2.231 (No Rating) Miles rated on Tuscola Border: PR Number: 754905 E Brown Rd (0.113 miles) 0.000 – 0.113 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Other) PR Number: 3440073 Marlette Rd (3.118 miles) 0.959 - 1.147 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=5 (Other) 1.147 - 1.197 NOT RATED 1.197 - 1.649 Sealcoat, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Other) 1.649 - 1.956 Sealcoat, 3 Lanes, Rating=2 (Other)
1.956 - 2.148 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Other) 2.148 - 2.457 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Other)
2.457 - 2.959 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=3 (Other) 2.959 - 3.140 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=5 (Other) 3.140 - 3.963 Gravel, 2 Lanes, Rating=Validated (Other)
3.963 - 4.127 Gravel, 1 Lane , Rating=Validated (Other) Miles Rated within County:
PR Number: 762203 Clifford Rd (1.002 miles) 2.800 - 3.314 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Burlington)
3.314 - 3.742 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=9 (Clifford) 3.742 - 3.802 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=9 (Clifford)
PR Number: 757505 Lake Pleasant Rd (0.400 miles) 5.550 - 5.750 Asphalt, 3 Lanes, Rating=7 (Clifford) **split made at: 5.75 5.750 - 5.950 Asphalt, 3 Lanes, Rating=9 (Clifford) PR Number: 1514409 Washburn Rd (1.590 miles) 4.082 - 4.601 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=3 (Other) 4.601 - 5.085 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=4 (Other) 5.085 - 5.456 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=5 (Other)
5.456 - 5.589 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Other) 5.589 - 5.621 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=7 (Other)
5.621 - 5.672 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Other)
PR Number: 75508 Cade Rd (3.870 miles) 0.742 - 1.751 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=7 (Goodland Twp) 1.751 - 1.798 NOT RATED 1.798 - 2.245 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Imlay Twp) 2.245 – 2.255 NOT RATED 2.255 - 3.685 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Imlay Twp) 3.685 - 4.669 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Imlay Twp)
PR Number: 3440076 Dryden Rd (1.512 miles) 0.000 - 0.983 Sealcoat, Lanes=2, Rating=7 (Almont Twp)
0.983 - 1.512 Sealcoat, Lanes=2, Rating=9 (Other) **outside of County PR Number: 3441168 Demille Blvd (0.451 miles) 0.000 - 0.451 Brick, Lanes=1, Rating=8 (Lapeer) PR Number: 344043 Demille Blvd (0.453 miles)
0.677 - 1.130 Brick, Lanes=1, Rating=6 (Lapeer) PR Number: 3440080 Hosner Rd (1.244 miles)
0.843 - 1.012 Gravel, Lanes=1, Rating=Validated (Other) *outside of county 1.012 - 1.052 Gravel, Lanes=2, Rating=Validated (Dryden Twp) *border 1.052 - 1.070 Gravel, Lanes=2, Rating=Validated (Dryden Twp) *border 1.070 - 1.589 Gravel, Lanes=2, Rating=Validated (Dryden Twp) 1.589 - 2.087 Gravel, Lanes=2, Rating=Validated (Dryden Twp)
Figure 2a: Lapeer County dataset in the LDC (circled roads have defined surface types and ratings)
Figure 2b: Total Miles rated for Lapeer County dataset in the LDC
2.1.2 Tuscola County test data
Total centerline miles defined: 22.299 Asphalt: 7.702 (Rated 4, 5, 8, 9) Composite: 5.339 (Rated 6, 7) Concrete: 2.433 (Rated 5, 6, 9) Sealcoat: 1.670 (Rated 7) Brick: 4.932 (Rated 8) Gravel: 0.223 (No Rating) Miles rated on Lapeer Border: PR Number: 754905 E Brown Rd (3.567 miles) 0.000 – 0.113 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Fremont Twp) 0.113 – 0.610 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Fremont Twp) 0.610 – 0.836 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Dayton Twp) 0.836 – 1.627 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Dayton Twp) 1.627 – 1.837 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Dayton Twp) 1.837 – 2.342 Composite, 3 Lanes, Rating=6 (Dayton Twp) 2.342 – 2.619 NOT RATED 2.619 – 2.851 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 2.851 – 3.621 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 3.621 – 3.844 Gravel, 2 Lanes, Rating=Validated PR Number: 3440073 Marlette Rd (3.355 miles) 0.000 – 0.116 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Koylton Twp) 0.116 – 0.146 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Koylton Twp) 0.146 – 0.639 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Koylton Twp) 0.639 – 0.959 NOT RATED
0.959 - 1.147 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=9 (Koylton Twp) 1.147 - 1.197 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=9 (Koylton Twp) 1.197 - 1.649 NOT RATED 1.649 - 1.956 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=9 (Koylton Twp)
1.956 - 2.148 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=9 (Koylton Twp) 2.148 - 2.457 Concrete, 3 Lanes, Rating=9 (Koylton Twp) 2.457 – 2.959 Sealcoat, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Koylton Twp) 2.959 – 3.140 Sealcoat, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Koylton Twp) 3.140 – 3.963 Sealcoat, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Koylton Twp) 3.963 – 4.127 Sealcoat, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Koylton Twp)
PR Number: 1018902 Marlette Rd (0.835 miles) 0.00 – 0.835 Asphalt, 3 Lanes, Rating=9 (Koylton Twp) Miles Rated within County:
PR Number: 268104 Millington Rd (3.002 miles) 14.318 – 15.315 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Watertown Twp) 15.315 – 16.311 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Watertown Twp) 16/311 – 16.688 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Watertown Twp) 16.688 – 17.320 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Watertown Twp) PR Number: 3790685 E Dayton Rd (2.224 miles)
0.000 – 0.794 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Wells Twp) 0.794 – 1.350 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Wells Twp) 1.350 – 2.003 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Wells Twp) 2.003 – 2.224 Asphalt, 2 Lanes, Rating=4 (Wells Twp)
PR Number: 766801 S Reese Rd (2.997 miles) 0.000 – 0.500 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Merritt Twp) 0.500 – 1.001 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Merritt Twp) 1.001 – 1.998 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Merritt Twp) 1.998 – 2.502 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Merritt Twp) 2.502 – 2.997 Composite, 2 Lanes, Rating=7 (Merritt Twp) PR Number: 266604 Columbia St (0.386 miles) 0.022 – 0.408 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Caro) PR Number: 266603 Montague Ave (0.299 miles) 0.000 – 0.060 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Caro) 0.060 – 0.130 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Caro) 0.130 – 0.219 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Caro) 0.219 – 0.299 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=5 (Caro) PR Number: 274309 N Unionville Rd (0.702 miles) 7.473 – 7.906 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Unionville) 7.906 – 7.968 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Unionville) 7.968 – 7.986 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Unionville) 7.986 – 8.050 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Unionville) 8.050 – 8.112 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Unionville) 8.112 – 8.175 Concrete, 2 Lanes, Rating=6 (Unionville)
PR Number: 270809 E Bevens Rd (2.511 miles) 10.983 – 11.986 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Kingston Twp) 11.986 – 12.987 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Kingston Twp) 12.987 – 13.494 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Kingston Twp) PR Number: 3760060 Snover Rd (2.421 miles) 0.00 – 1.484 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Kingston Twp) 1.484 – 2.421 Brick, 2 Lanes, Rating=8 (Lamotte Twp)
Figure 3a: Tuscola County in the LDC (circled roads have defined surface types and ratings)
Figure 3b: Total roads rated for Tuscola County dataset in the LDC
2.2 Investment Reporting Data Tests
The second set of testing verifies investments reported to the IRT. The Roadsoft TAMC menu gives three options to allow local agencies to export and upload their investment data from Roadsoft to the IRT. For the investment reporting data tests, the project team used the trial datasets to analyze each of the available data export options (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Roadsoft TAMC Menu
Testing focused on project data with the required Project IDs and how those individual project records were handled and combined. The project team uploaded the 2016 completed project export files, which included several different pavement treatment types, project dates, locations, duplication, owners, and segment lengths. Planned road treatment files as well as bridge treatment files were uploaded and tested.
Total records sent for each:
Current Road Treatments:
Garden City: 11 treatment records
Washtenaw County: 10 treatment records 11 treatment records (to test duplication)
Planned Road Treatments:
Garden City: 9 treatment records
Washtenaw County: 25 treatment records
Current & Planned Bridge Treatments:
Jackson County: 5 treatment records
Because Roadsoft allows for customization of surface and treatment types, Roadsoft treatment type data must be “mapped” to IRT treatment type data prior to attempting the export process. This mapping must be defined on the Surface Type Definition form (Figure 5) where a TAMC Project Classification can be assigned for each Roadsoft-defined treatment. The available designations for TAMC project classifications match those in the IRT. This mapping has been simplified from previous versions: whereas previous versions had both a classification and a treatment type, the new simplified classification categories are Light Preventative Maintenance, Heavy Preventative Maintenance,
Rehabilitation and Reconstruction. Previously existing mappings were re-mapped if possible or cleared if the mappings were not obviously able to be mapped.
Figure 5: Surface Definition Form – Mapping Roadsoft treatment to IRT TAMC project classification
The export process also requires that Lanes be updated to reflect how many lanes were included in the project and requires that Life Expectancy and Project ID fields must be entered. If the required fields and mappings have not been done, a message will display indicating that the file will not be accepted by the IRT (Figure 6). Projects can also be excluded if necessary by unchecking the Include check box.
Figure 6: Entering required fields before Export
After the required fields are completed, Roadsoft creates an XML file version for the user, and file must be uploaded manually to the IRT. The file includes the name of the jurisdiction, the type of data being included, and the framework version used. The XML format is new for this process, and the previously available web-transfer option has been retired. Files must now be manually uploaded into the IRT where the upload process will provide feedback as to which records will or will not be loaded and why.
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 PASER Data Test Results
3.1.1 Transferring the Collection Network to the LDC (Figure 1: Steps 1-4)
The generated road networks for both Lapeer and Tuscola counties were sent from the local agency version of Roadsoft to the companion version of the LDC. Datasets compared before and after the data transfer exhibited no change to the data—that is, the before and after datasets were identical for both test counties.
3.1.2 Transferring Collected Rating Data back to Local Agency’s Roadsoft (Figure 1: Steps 5-7)
After importing the LDC data into the local agency Roadsoft database, each dataset did contain values for the number of lanes, location, pavement type, and rating number. Datasets compared before and after the data transfer exhibited no change—that is, the before and after datasets were identical for both test counties.
3.1.3 Transferring Local Agency’s Roadsoft data to the Region Roadsoft Database (Figure 1: Steps 8-9)
Prior to importing the local agency Roadsoft data into the Region database, the project team created an empty database for each Planning Region. Lapeer County is in Planning Region 5 and Tuscola County is in Planning Region 7. Datasets compared before and after the data transfer exhibited no change—that is, the before and after datasets were identical sets for both test counties.
3.1.4 Transferring data from Region’s Roadsoft Database to CSS (Figure 1: Step 10)
The instruction for delivering the final dataset via the IRT to CSS guides region coordinators to export a shapefile using a command found in the TAMC menu of Roadsoft. After performing the export for the two counties in each Region dataset, the CSS verified the shapefiles.
3.1.5 Final Results from CSS after Data Processing
The two datasets were sent to the CSS for processing. The CSS processed the datasets in different orders to simulate the reception of the datasets at different times. The first test processed Region 5 first and Region 7 second whereas the second test processed Region 7 first and Region 5 second. Both tests resulted in the datasets being processed with no loss of data; this included the shared roads between the two counties.
3.2 Investment Reporting Data Tests
3.2.1 Uploading Roadsoft data files in the IRT
The project team used each of the three Roadsoft TAMC menu export options to create data files from Roadsoft. The previously available web-transfer process has been discontinued in this version of Roadsoft. Agencies must now create data files from Roadsoft and manually upload them to the IRT.
3.2.2 Results from the IRT
To confirm receipt of the records, the CSS provided a test userid for the IRT. Appropriate jurisdictions were assigned to that userid, which granted access to review records directly in the IRT. Records uploaded from a Roadsoft file were verified in the IRT by using the Data tab and viewing the asset data by year. In addition to the test files described here, extensive testing was done prior to the release of the new IRT version. Issues found during that testing were reported to the CSS and then tested again after notification of fixes being applied. All found issues were corrected.
3.2.3 Road Current Treatments
Garden City: 11 treatment records: Of the 11 treatment records that were uploaded to the IRT, 9 of them were successfully received. Two records were considered “not owned” or “partially owned” and were not created. This was an anticipated result from the IRT since agencies are expected to report on their own roads.
Washtenaw County: 10 treatment records: Of the 10 treatment records that were uploaded to the IRT, 5 records were successfully received. Five records were considered “not owned” and were not created. This was an anticipated result from the IRT since agencies are expected to report on their own roads.
No other issues were found with this file. Records were all received and combined together in projects as expected.
To test the handling of duplicate records, an additional Washtenaw file was uploaded; this file contained all of the original 10 treatment records as well as one additional record. Results were as expected with one additional record being created, five “not owned” records being ignored, and no duplicates being created.
3.2.4 Road Planned Treatments
Garden City: 9 treatment records: Of the 9 treatment records sent to the IRT, 7 records were successfully received. Two records were considered “not owned” or “partially owned” and were not created. This was an anticipated result from the IRT since agencies are expected to report on their own roads.
No other issues were found with this file. Records were all received and combined together in projects as expected.
Washtenaw County: 25 treatment records: Of the 25 treatment records sent to the IRT, all records were successfully received and exhibited the anticipated results.
3.2.5 Bridge Current & Planned Treatments Jackson County: 5 treatment records: Of the five treatment records uploaded to the IRT, the IRT successfully created of the records, and the received data closely matched what was sent. In three cases, the milepoint listed for the bridge slightly differed from what was sent. After investigation, it was determined that the IRT displays the milepoint from the MiBRIDGE system, not the milepoint from the Roadsoft database. In some instances, this was slightly different but was still within the correct location of the bridge. It was determined that the Structure ID for the bridge is the important key for the bridge and that the milepoint differences were acceptable.
During initial IRT testing, multiple other agencies’ files were also tested and included other test cases such as bridges “not owned” bridges, current and future dates, various treatments, and duplicates.
The IRT either successfully received all treatment records and the received data matched what was sent or ignored treatment records as they should have been.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The testing of the TAMC PASER data submission process followed the guidelines that are taught each year in the PASER training class. Following these instructions resulted in no loss of data throughout the entire testing process.
The testing of the Roadsoft-to-IRT upload of treatment data relied on the TAMC menu options to export and create files for treatment data. The road treatments were entered directly in the Road Module, using Multi-Edit or the Project Builder as test projects; and, bridge treatments were entered in the Bridge Module for local activities. The Current Road Treatment, Planned Road Treatment, and Bridge files all uploaded successfully—that is, the IRT received the data without any data being rejected, unless appropriate based on business rules.
The uploaded data had only two discrepancies: ownership and bridge milepoints. The IRT expects that the projects being reported are “owned” by the agency reporting the treatments. Segments where the ownership does not match the reporting agency are not uploaded into the IRT. This is by design and those rejected records can be either manually entered if necessary or successfully reported by the “owner” agency.
It was also found that the resulting milepoints of some bridges varied slightly from what was sent. The IRT uses the MiBRIDGE milepoint, which can vary slightly from the milepoint in Roadsoft. It was determined that the Structure ID is the main key for the bridge and that milepoint discrepancies are still considered appropriate.
CTT and CSS project teams feel confident that the entire process is working correctly with adherence to prescribed business rules and without loss of data.
Summary Statistics – TAMC Investment Reporting Compliance
As of November 22, 2017
Fiscal Year 2016
Agencies Approved for Investment Reporting 566
Not Approved: #1‐ No Data or IRT User 34
Not Approved: #2 – IRT & ADARS Not Matching 0
Not Approved: #3 – IRT Status Not Updated 8
Not Approved: #4 – IRT AM Survey Not Completed 0
Agency Not Yet Reported (Act 51 Report Extension) 9
Fiscal Year 2017
Agencies Approved for Investment Reporting 172
Not Approved: #1‐ No Data or IRT User 6
Not Approved: #2 – IRT & ADARS Not Matching 0
Not Approved: #3 – IRT Status Not Updated 41
Not Approved: #4 – IRT AM Survey Not Completed 9
Agency Not Yet Reported (Not Yet Due) 389
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Agency Name Agency Type
(FIPS)
Compliance
Status
Reviewer Review
Start Date
Review
Finish
Date
Comments Has
IRT
User
Road Status
Alcona COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Alger COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Allegan COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/28/17 05/01/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Alpena COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Antrim COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Arenac COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/08/17 08/22/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Baraga COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Barry COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/20/17 04/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bay COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/24/17 06/05/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Benzie COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Berrien COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/20/17 04/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Branch COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Calhoun COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cass COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/08/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Charlevoix COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/10/17 05/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cheboygan COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/20/17 10/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Chippewa COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/08/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clare COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/08/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clinton COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 06/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Crawford COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/08/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Delta COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/17/17 07/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dickinson COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/18/17 06/07/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Eaton COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/17/17 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Emmet COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Genesee COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gladwin COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gogebic COUNTY Approved Belknap 08/22/17 10/18/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grand Traverse COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/05/17 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gratiot COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hillsdale COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Houghton COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
1 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Huron COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/05/17 07/24/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ingham COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/13/17 06/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ionia COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/02/17 05/02/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Iosco COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/05/17 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Iron COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/01/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Isabella COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Jackson COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/25/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kalamazoo COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/19/17 04/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kalkaska COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/21/17 08/22/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kent COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 03/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Keweenaw COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/05/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/13/17 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lapeer COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/05/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Leelanau COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lenawee COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Livingston COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Luce COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mackinac COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Macomb COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Manistee COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/08/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marquette COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mason COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mecosta COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Menominee COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Midland COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 07/24/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Missaukee COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Monroe COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/20/17 06/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Montcalm COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Montmorency COUNTY Approved Belknap 08/31/17 08/31/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Muskegon COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Newaygo COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Oakland COUNTY Approved Belknap 08/30/17 08/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Oceana COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ogemaw COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ontonagon COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/29/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
2 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Osceola COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Oscoda COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/04/17 05/04/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Otsego COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ottawa COUNTY Approved Belknap 09/19/17 09/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Presque Isle COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/05/17 06/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Roscommon COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/05/17 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Saginaw COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/13/17 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St. Clair COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/26/17 06/26/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St. Joseph COUNTY Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sanilac COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/05/17 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Schoolcraft COUNTY Approved Belknap 03/13/17 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shiawassee COUNTY Approved Belknap 06/05/17 06/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Tuscola COUNTY Approved Belknap 09/19/17 09/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Van Buren COUNTY Approved Belknap 04/17/17 04/19/17 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Washtenaw COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/26/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wayne COUNTY Approved Belknap 6/6/2017 6/6/2017 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wexford COUNTY Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Addison village Approved McNichol 05/31/16 05/31/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Adrian city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 03/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ahmeek village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 08/22/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Akron village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Alanson village Approved Belknap 11/14/16 11/30/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Albion city Approved Belknap 05/01/17 10/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Algonac city
Allegan city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Allen village No, #1 McNichol 01/23/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Allen Park city No, #1 McNichol 01/23/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Alma city Approved Belknap 03/06/17 05/15/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Almont village Approved Belknap 09/15/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Alpena city Approved McNichol 01/23/17 03/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Alpha village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ann Arbor city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Applegate village Approved Belknap 12/19/16 05/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Armada village Approved Belknap 11/14/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ashley village Approved Belknap 12/16/16 10‐110‐17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
3 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Athens village Approved Belknap 11/14/16 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Auburn city Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Auburn Hills city Approved McNichol 03/27/17 03/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Au Gres city No, #1 McNichol 11/14/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Augusta village Approved Belknap 09/19/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bad Axe city Approved Belknap 10/19/16 10/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Baldwin village Approved Belknap 09/15/16 11/30/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bancroft village Approved McNichol 09/19/16 09/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bangor city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Baraga village Approved Belknap 10/06/16 11/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Baroda village Approved Belknap 09/19/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Barryton village No, #1 McNichol 07/29/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Barton Hills village Approved McNichol 09/27/16 09/27/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Battle Creek city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bay City city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bear Lake village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 09/09/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Beaverton city
Belding city Approved Belknap 09/02/16 04/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bellaire village Approved McNichol 05/31/16 05/31/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Belleville city Approved Belknap 12/27/16 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bellevue village Approved McNichol 04/14/17 04/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Benton Harbor city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/20/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Benzonia village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 11/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Berkley city Approved McNichol 12/05/16 12/05/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Berrien Springs village Approved Belknap 01/24/17 04/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bessemer city Approved Belknap 01/24/17 05/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Beulah village No, #3 Belknap 07/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Beverly Hills village Approved Belknap 03/06/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Big Rapids city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bingham Farms village Approved Belknap 11/15/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Birch Run village No, #3 McNichol 11/07/16 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Birmingham city Approved McNichol 01/24/17 01/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Blissfield village Approved Belknap 03/28/17 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bloomfield Hills city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 08/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bloomingdale village Approved Belknap 07/11/16 12/01/15 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
4 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Boyne City city Approved Belknap 06/14/16 05/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Boyne Falls village Approved Belknap 07/11/16 07/22/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Breckenridge village Approved Belknap 11/15/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Breedsville village Approved McNichol 05/31/16 06/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bridgman city Approved Belknap 01/24/17 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Brighton city Approved McNichol 01/24/17 01/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Britton village Approved Belknap 06/28/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bronson city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Brooklyn village Approved McNichol 01/24/17 01/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Brown City city Approved Belknap 07/29/16 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Buchanan city No, #1 McNichol 11/15/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Buckley village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 09/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Burlington village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 08/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Burr Oak village No, #1 McNichol 11/07/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Burton city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 09/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Byron village Approved Belknap 10/11/16 11/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cadillac city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 05/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Caledonia village Approved McNichol 11/07/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Calumet village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 08/22/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Camden village Approved Belknap 10/18/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Capac village Approved Belknap 11/15/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Carleton village Approved Belknap 06/21/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Carney village No, #1 McNichol 09/02/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Caro city Approved McNichol 11/07/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Carson City city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 01/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Carsonville village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Caseville city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Casnovia village Approved Belknap 09/15/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Caspian city Approved Belknap 11/17/16 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cass City village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 11/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cassopolis village Approved McNichol 10/21/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cedar Springs city Approved Belknap 01/24/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Cement City village Approved McNichol 11/07/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Center Line city Approved McNichol 01/23/17 01/23/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Central Lake village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
5 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Centreville village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 10/20/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Charlevoix city Approved Belknap 10/07/16 11/17/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Charlotte city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Chatham village No, #1 Jennett 09/11/17 No Status, Projects or AM NO INCOMPLETE
Cheboygan city No, #3 McNichol 01/24/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Chelsea city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Chesaning village Approved Belknap 11/07/16 05/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clare city Approved Belknap 01/24/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clarksville village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 07/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clawson city Approved Belknap 12/19/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clayton village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 08/04/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clifford village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 08/11/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Climax village No, #1 McNichol 11/07/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Clinton village Approved Belknap 11/17/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clio city No, #1 McNichol 12/16/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Coldwater city Approved Belknap 12/19/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Coleman city Approved Belknap 11/07/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Coloma city Approved Belknap 11/17/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Colon village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 11/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Columbiaville village Approved Belknap 10/10/16 05/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Concord village Approved McNichol 06/23/17 06/23/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Constantine village Approved Jennett 03/28/17 09/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete NO COMPLETE
Coopersville city Approved Belknap 11/09/16 01/31/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Copemish village Approved Belknap 06/14/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Copper City village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Corunna city Approved McNichol 11/17/16 11/17/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Croswell city Approved Belknap 11/21/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Crystal Falls city Approved McNichol 03/20/17 03/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Custer village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 09/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Daggett village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dansville village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 08/02/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Davison city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dearborn city Approved McNichol 01/23/17 01/23/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dearborn Heights city Approved Belknap 11/29/16 04/17/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Decatur village No, #1 McNichol 07/12/16 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
6 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Deckerville village Approved Belknap 10/07/16 11/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Deerfield village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Detour village Approved Belknap 09/19/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Detroit city Approved Belknap 09/02/16 12/21/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dewitt city Approved Belknap 11/09/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dexter village Approved Belknap 01/27/17 05/09/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dimondale village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 09/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Village of Douglas Approved Belknap 01/27/17 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dowagiac city Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dryden village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 08/11/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dundee village Approved McNichol 07/12/16 07/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Durand city Approved Belknap 11/10/16 06/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Eagle village No, #1 McNichol 9/2/2016 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
East Grand Rapids city Approved Belknap 11/10/16 03/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
East Jordan city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Eastlake village Approved Belknap 01/27/17 04/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
East Lansing city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Eastpointe city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
East Tawas city Approved Belknap 01/30/17 04/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Eaton Rapids city Approved Belknap 5/8/2017 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Eau Claire village Approved Belknap 09/19/16 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ecorse city Approved Belknap 11/17/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Edmore village Approved Belknap 11/17/16 05/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Edwardsburg village Approved McNichol 09/15/16 09/15/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elberta village Approved Belknap 06/14/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elk Rapids village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elkton village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 11/09/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ellsworth village Approved Belknap 06/14/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elsie village Approved Belknap 10/07/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Emmett village Approved Belknap 05/16/31 08/11/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Empire village Approved Belknap 11/10/16 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Escanaba city Approved Belknap 11/17/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Essexville city No, #1 McNichol 02/16/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Estral Beach village Approved Belknap 11/07/63 04/20/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Evart city Approved McNichol 10/10/16 10/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
7 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Fairgrove village Approved McNichol 11/21/16 11/21/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Farmington city Approved Belknap 11/18/16 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Farmington Hills city Approved McNichol 12/16/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Farwell village Approved Belknap 11/10/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fennville city Approved Belknap 01/27/17 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fenton city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ferndale city Approved Belknap 01/27/17 04/13/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ferrysburg city Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fife Lake village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 09/09/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Flat Rock city Approved Belknap 01/23/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Flint city Approved Belknap 09/02/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Flushing city Approved McNichol 01/27/17 01/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Forestville village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 12/08/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fountain village Approved McNichol 11/10/16 11/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fowler village Approved Belknap 05/08/17 05/10/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fowlerville village Approved Belknap 11/10/16 05/15/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Frankenmuth city Approved Belknap 10/07/16 12/06/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Frankfort city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Franklin village Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fraser city Approved McNichol 03/07/17 03/07/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Freeport village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Freesoil village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 09/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fremont city Approved Belknap 11/18/16 04/18/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fruitport village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 08/03/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gaastra city Approved McNichol 11/10/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gagetown village Approved Belknap 11/10/16 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gaines village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 09/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Galesburg city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Galien village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Garden village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Garden City city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gaylord city Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gibraltar city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gladstone city Approved Belknap 10/11/16 04/20/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gladwin city
8 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Gobles city Approved McNichol 12/16/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Goodrich village Approved McNichol 12/16/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grand Beach village Approved McNichol 03/07/17 03/07/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grand Blanc city Approved Belknap 10/07/16 11/15/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grand Haven city Approved Belknap 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grand Ledge city No, #3 McNichol 01/27/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Grand Rapids city Approved McNichol 01/27/17 01/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grandville city Approved Belknap 12/16/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grant city Approved McNichol 11/10/16 11/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grass Lake village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 09/12/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grayling city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Greenville city Approved McNichol 12/16/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grosse Pointe city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grosse Pointe Farms city Approved Belknap 11/21/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grosse Pointe Park city Approved Belknap 11/10/16 04/13/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grosse Pointe Woods city Approved Belknap 12/19/16 04/13/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hamtramck city Approved Belknap 01/23/17 04/13/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hancock city Approved McNichol 01/27/17 01/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hanover village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Harbor Beach city Approved Belknap 12/16/16 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Harbor Springs city Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Harper Woods city Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Harrietta village Approved Jennett 06/02/17 08/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Harrison city No, #3 McNichol 06/23/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Harrisville city Approved Belknap 11/18/16 04/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hart city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 04/24/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hartford city No, #1 McNichol 01/27/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Hastings city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hazel Park city Approved Belknap 01/27/17 04/25/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hersey village
Hesperia village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 11/28/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Highland Park city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 06/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hillman village Approved Belknap 07/12/16 09/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hillsdale city Approved Belknap 02/15/17 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Holland city Approved Belknap 02/15/17 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
9 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Holly village Approved Belknap 11/10/16 05/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Homer village Approved Belknap 06/02/17 07/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Honor village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 10/03/17 ADARSAM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hopkins village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 08/29/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Houghton city Approved Belknap 11/10/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Howard City village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 10/06/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Howell city Approved Belknap 12/05/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hubbardston village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 11/15/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hudson city Approved McNichol 11/10/16 11/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hudsonville city Approved Belknap 10/21/16 06/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Huntington Woods city Approved Belknap 10/06/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Imlay City city Approved McNichol 11/10/16 04/07/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Inkster city Approved McNichol 12/16/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ionia city Approved Belknap 11/21/16 04/17/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Iron Mountain city Approved Belknap 10/21/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Iron River city Approved Belknap 11/21/16 05/15/17 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ironwood city Approved Belknap 01/04/17 01/10/16 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ishpeming city No, #3 McNichol 06/02/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Ithaca city Approved McNichol 12/16/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Jackson city No, #1 McNichol 11/21/16 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
Jonesville village Approved McNichol 12/16/16/ 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kalamazoo city YES
Kaleva village Approved McNichol 03/06/17 03/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kalkaska village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 09/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Keego Harbor city Approved Belknap 11/18/16 04/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kent City village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 08/24/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kentwood city Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kinde village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kingsford city Approved Belknap 12/16/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kingsley village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 09/12/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kingston village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 08/11/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Laingsburg city Approved Belknap 12/21/16 12/21/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake Angelus city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake Ann village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 09/12/19 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake City city Approved Belknap 07/15/16 09/13/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
10 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Lake Linden village Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake Odessa village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 09/20/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake Orion village Approved Belknap 12/19/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lakeview village No, #1 McNichol 06/15/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Lakewood Club village Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
L'Anse village Approved Belknap 02/15/17 05/26/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lansing city Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lapeer city Approved Belknap 02/15/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lathrup Village city Approved Belknap 02/15/17 04/13/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Laurium village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 08/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lawrence village Approved Belknap 07/15/16 09/27/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lawton village Approved Belknap 09/16/16 09/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lennon village Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Leonard village Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Leroy village Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Leslie city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/20/17 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lexington village Approved Belknap 11/21/16 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lincoln village Approved Belknap 11/18/16 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lincoln Park city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/03/17 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Linden city No, #1 McNichol 02/16/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Litchfield city No, #1 McNichol 10/11/16 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
Livonia city Approved Belknap 05/08/17 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lowell city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 03/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ludington city Approved Belknap 05/08/17 07/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Luna Pier city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Luther village Approved Belknap 06/20/16 09/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lyons village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 09/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
McBain city Approved McNichol 08/17/16 08/17/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
McBride village Approved McNichol 07/29/16 07/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mackinac Island city Approved Belknap 11/18/16 05/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mackinaw City village Approved Belknap 07/15/16 09/13/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Madison Heights city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mancelona village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Manchester village Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Manistee city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
11 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Manistique city Approved Belknap 11/29/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Manton city Approved McNichol 01/23/17 01/23/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Maple Rapids village Approved Belknap 05/08/17 08/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marcellus village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marine City city No, #1 McNichol 11/23/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Marion village Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marlette city Approved McNichol 08/17/16 08/17/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marquette city Approved Belknap 04/10/17 04/26/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marshall city Approved Belknap 12/16/16 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Martin village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 10/31/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marysville city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mason city
Mattawan village Approved McNichol 11/18/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Maybee village No, #3 McNichol 04/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Mayville village Approved Belknap 9/16/16/ 05/10/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mecosta village No, #1 McNichol 11/21/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Melvin village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 06/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Melvindale city Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Memphis city Approved Belknap 09/27/16 11/21/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mendon village Approved Belknap 11/18/16 04/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Menominee city No, #3 McNichol 02/16/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Merrill village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 09/21/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mesick village Approved Belknap 06/21/16 08/01/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Metamora village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Michiana village Approved McNichol 11/23/17 11/23/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Middleville village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Midland city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Milan city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Milford village Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Millersburg village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 05/03/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Millington village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 11/30/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Minden City village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 06/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Monroe city Approved Belknap 10/07/16 05/10/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Montague city Approved Belknap 10/11/16 11/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Montgomery village No, #1 McNichol 10/07/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
12 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Montrose city Approved Belknap 03/06/17 06/02/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Morenci city Approved Belknap 11/23/17 05/03/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Morley village Approved McNichol 07/15/16 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Morrice village Approved Belknap 07/15/16 09/13/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mt Clemens city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 06/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mt Morris city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mt Pleasant city Approved Belknap 04/28/17 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Muir village Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mulliken village Approved Belknap 10/11/16 12/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Munising city No, #1 McNichol 12/10/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Muskegon city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Muskegon Heights city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Nashville village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 11/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Negaunee city Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Newaygo city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
New Baltimore city Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Newberry village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
New Buffalo city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 05/01/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
New Era village No, #1 Jennett 08/22/17 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
New Haven village No, #1 McNichol 09/02/16 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
New Lothrop village Approved Belknap 01/30/17 07/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Niles city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
North Adams village Approved Belknap 12/12/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
North Branch village Approved Belknap 07/15/16 08/24/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
North Muskegon city Approved Belknap 04/16/17 04/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Northport village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Northville city Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Norton Shores city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Norway city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Novi city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Oakley village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 07/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Oak Park city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Olivet city No, #1 Belknap 12/29/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Omer city Approved Belknap 10/11/16 12/08/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Onaway city Approved McNichol 11/18/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
13 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Onekama village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Onsted village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 12/01/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ontonagon village Approved Belknap 11/23/16 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Orchard Lake city Approved Belknap 09/26/16 09/26/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ortonville village Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Otisville village Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Otsego city Approved McNichol 11/18/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Otter Lake village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 08/11/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ovid village Approved Belknap 03/13/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Owendale village Approved Belknap 10/07/15 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Owosso city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Oxford village Approved Belknap 10/21/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Parchment city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Parma village Approved Belknap 10/07/16 07/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Paw Paw village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Peck village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pellston village Approved Belknap 10/11/19 11/30/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pentwater village Approved Belknap 11/29/16 04/17/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Perrinton village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 11/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Perry city Approved Belknap 01/23/17 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Petersburg city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Petoskey city Approved Belknap 04/30/17 05/01/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pewamo village Approved Belknap 10/07/16 11/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pierson village No, #1 Belknap 09/02/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Pigeon village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 10/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pinckney village Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pinconning city Approved Belknap 11/29/16 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Plainwell city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pleasant Ridge city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Plymouth city Approved Belknap 12/19/16 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pontiac city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Portage city Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Port Austin village Approved McNichol 12/10/16 10/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Port Hope village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Port Huron city Approved McNichol 12/19/16 12/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
14 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Portland city Approved Belknap 11/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Port Sanilac village Approved Belknap 11/23/16 06/27/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Posen village No, #1 McNichol 05/08/17 No Data YES COMPLETE
Potterville city Approved Belknap 02/16/12 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Powers village Approved Belknap 11/23/16 06/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Prescott village Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Quincy village Approved Belknap 03/06/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ravenna village Approved McNichol 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Reading city No, #1 McNichol 02/16/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Reed City city Approved Belknap 10/21/16 11/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Reese village Approved Belknap 09/12/16 09/12/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Richland village Approved Belknap 06/15/16 06/24/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Richmond city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
River Rouge city No, #1 McNichol 12/10/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Riverview city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rochester city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rochester Hills city Approved McNichol 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rockford city Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rockwood city Approved Belknap 11/29/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rogers City city Approved McNichol 12/20/16 12/20/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Romeo village Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Romulus city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Roosevelt Park city Approved McNichol 03/06/17 03/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Roscommon village Approved McNichol 03/06/17 03/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rosebush village Approved Belknap 12/10/16 04/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rose City city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Roseville city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/20/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rothbury village Approved Belknap 06/15/16 08/04/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Royal Oak city Approved McNichol 01/23/17 01/23/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Saginaw city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St Charles village Approved Belknap 10/07/16 12/13/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St Clair city No, #1 McNichol 04/10/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
St Clair Shores city Approved Belknap 11/21/16 12/05/16 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St Ignace city Approved McNichol 05/08/17 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St Johns city Approved Belknap 11/18/16 11/28/16 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
15 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
St Joseph city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 08/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St Louis city Approved McNichol 12/20/16 12/20/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Saline city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sand Lake village Approved Belknap 11/16/16 11/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sandusky city No, #1 McNichol 07/29/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Sanford village Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Saranac village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 08/30/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Saugatuck city Approved Belknap 11/21/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sault Ste Marie city Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Schoolcraft village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 08/03/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Scottville city Approved McNichol 09/27/16 09/27/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sebewaing village Approved Belknap 11/29/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shelby village Approved Belknap 07/25/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shepherd village Approved McNichol 07/25/16 10/21/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sheridan village Approved Belknap 08/17/16 09/13/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sherwood village Approved Belknap 11/29/16 07/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shoreham village Approved McNichol 11/29/16 11/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Southfield city Approved Belknap 03/28/17 08/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Southgate city Approved Belknap 12/10/16 01/31/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
South Haven city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 08/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
South Lyon city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 08/29/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
South Range village Approved Belknap 05/16/16 07/07/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
South Rockwood village Approved Belknap 11/23/16 05/08/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sparta village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Springfield city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Spring Lake village Approved McNichol 12/10/16 12/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Springport village Approved Belknap 08/10/16 11/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Standish city Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stanton city Approved Belknap 10/21/16 08/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stanwood village Approved McNichol 08/10/16 08/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stephenson city Approved Belknap 09/19/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sterling village Approved McNichol 07/29/16 12/10/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sterling Heights city Approved Belknap 12/20/16 04/18/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stevensville village Approved Belknap 09/27/16 12/08/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stockbridge village Approved Belknap 09/16/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
16 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Sturgis city Approved McNichol 04/10/17 04/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sunfield village Approved McNichol 05/31/16 09/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Suttons Bay village Approved Belknap 06/23/17 10/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Swartz Creek city No, #1 McNichol 10/21/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Sylvan Lake city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 08/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Tawas City city Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Taylor city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Tecumseh city Approved Belknap 11/23/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Tekonsha village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 09/09/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Thompsonville village Approved McNichol 12/12/16 12/12/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Three Oaks village Approved McNichol 03/28/17 03/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Three Rivers city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/18/18 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Traverse City city Approved McNichol 11/23/16 11/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Trenton city Approved Belknap 10/07/16 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Troy city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Turner village
Tustin village Approved McNichol 07/29/16 07/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Twining village Approved McNichol 03/06/17 03/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ubly village Approved Belknap 05/31/16 08/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Union City village No, #1 McNichol 12/12/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Unionville village Approved Belknap 07/25/16 09/23/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Utica city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vandalia village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 11/09/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vanderbilt village Approved Belknap 10/11/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vassar city Approved Belknap 12/20/16 05/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vermontville village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vernon village Approved Belknap 09/19/16 12/01/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vicksburg village Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/20/17 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Village of Clarkston city Approved Belknap 12/16/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
The Village of Grosse Pointe S city Approved Belknap 09/19/16 04/12/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Village of Lake Isabella village Approved Belknap 02/15/17 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wakefield city Approved McNichol 02/16/17 02/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Waldron village Approved Belknap 09/16/16 10/19/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Walker city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Walkerville village Approved Belknap 12/12/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
17 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2016
Walled Lake city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Warren city Approved Belknap 12/12/16 04/06/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Watervliet city No, #1 McNichol 09/27/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Wayland city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 08/31/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wayne city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/13/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Webberville village
West Branch city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 07/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Westland city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 05/01/17 ADARS spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Westphalia village Approved Belknap 09/09/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
White Cloud city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Whitehall city Approved Belknap 04/11/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
White Pigeon village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 06/05/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Whittemore city Approved Belknap 10/07/16 11/18/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Williamston city Approved Belknap 10/21/16 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wixom city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 06/20/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wolverine village Approved Belknap 07/29/16 09/16/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wolverine Lake village No, #1 McNichol 12/16/16 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
Woodhaven city Approved Belknap 02/16/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Woodland village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wyandotte city Approved Jennett 03/07/17 09/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wyoming city Approved McNichol 11/29/16 11/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Yale city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 12/29/16 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ypsilanti city Approved Belknap 02/15/17 04/11/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Zeeland city Approved Belknap 12/29/16 04/24/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Zilwaukee city Approved Belknap 12/16/16 04/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
18 of 18
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Agency Name Agency
Type (FIPS)
Compliance
Status
Reviewer Review
Start Date
Review
Finish Date
Comments Has IRT
User
IRT Status
Addison village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Adrian city
Ahmeek village Approved Belknap 05/12/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Akron village
Alanson village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Albion city
Algonac city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Allegan city
Allen village
Allen Park city
Alma city
Almont village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Alpena city
Alpha village
Ann Arbor city
Applegate village Approved Belknap 09/19/17 09/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Armada village Approved Jennett 08/21/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ashley village Approved Belknap 09/28/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Athens village Approved Belknap 07/17/17 07/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Auburn city
Auburn Hills city
Au Gres city Approved Belknap 09/28/17 11/15/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Augusta village Approved Belknap 08/21/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bad Axe city
Baldwin village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 10/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bancroft village No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Bangor city
Baraga village No, #3 Belknap 07/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Baroda village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 11/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Barryton village No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Barton Hills village IRT is not able to be updated
Battle Creek city
Bay City city
1 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Bear Lake village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Beaverton city
Belding city
Bellaire village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Belleville city
Bellevue village
Benton Harbor city
Benzonia village No, #3 Jennett 09/05/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Berkley city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Berrien Springs village
Bessemer city
Beulah village
Beverly Hills village
Big Rapids city
Bingham Farms village
Birch Run village
Birmingham city
Blissfield village
Bloomfield Hills city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bloomingdale village No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Boyne City city
Boyne Falls village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Breckenridge village Approved Jennett 09/28/17 09/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Breedsville village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bridgman city
Brighton city Approved Belknap 10/16/17 10/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Britton village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 10/18/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Bronson city
Brooklyn village
Brown City city Approved Jennett 08/21/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Buchanan city
Buckley village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 11/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Burlington village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Burr Oak village Approved Belknap 11/07/17 11/07/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Burton city
2 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Byron village No, #3 Jennett 09/05/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Cadillac city No, #3 Belknap 11/03/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Caledonia village
Calumet village Approved Belknap 07/17/17 07/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Camden village
Capac village
Carleton village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 11/14/17 ADARS Am Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Carney village
Caro city
Carson City city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/02/17 ADARS Am Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Carsonville village
Caseville city
Casnovia village
Caspian city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Cass City village
Cassopolis village
Cedar Springs city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Cement City village Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Center Line city
Central Lake village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Centreville village Approved Belknap 08/21/17 11/21/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Charlevoix city Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Charlotte city
Chatham village
Cheboygan city
Chelsea city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Chesaning village
Clare city
Clarksville village Approved Belknap 07/17/17 07/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clawson city
Clayton village Approved Belknap 08/21/17 11/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clifford village Approved Belknap 05/09/17 05/09/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Climax village
Clinton village Approved Belknap 08/21/17 10/18/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Clio city No, #3 Belknap 11/03/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
3 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Coldwater city
Coleman city
Coloma city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Colon village No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Columbiaville village Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Concord village
Constantine village
Coopersville city
Copemish village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Copper City village
Corunna city
Croswell city
Crystal Falls city
Custer village Approved Belknap 05/12/17 07/28/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Daggett village
Dansville village No, #3 Belknap 07/24/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Davison city
Dearborn city
Dearborn Heights city
Decatur village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Deckerville village Approved Jennett 08/22/17 08/22/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Deerfield village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/19/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Detour village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Detroit city
Dewitt city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dexter village
Dimondale village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Village of Douglas
Dowagiac city
Dryden village Approved Belknap 05/15/17 05/15/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Dundee village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Durand city
Eagle village
East Grand Rapids city No, #3 Jennett 09/11/17 No Status or AM questions YES INCOMPLETE
East Jordan city
4 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Eastlake village
East Lansing city
Eastpointe city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
East Tawas city
Eaton Rapids city
Eau Claire village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ecorse city No, #4 Belknap 11/02/17 Missing AM info YES INCOMPLETE
Edmore village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Edwardsburg village Approved Belknap 09/11/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elberta village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Complete ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elk Rapids village
Elkton village Approved Belknap 08/22/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Complete ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ellsworth village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Elsie village No, #1 Jennett 08/21/17 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
Emmett village Approved McNichol 06/23/17 06/23/17 ADARS AM Complete ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Empire village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 11/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Escanaba city No, #3 Belknap 11/03/17 Needs status updated YES INCOMPLETE
Essexville city
Estral Beach village
Evart city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fairgrove village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Farmington city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Farmington Hills city
Farwell village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fennville city
Fenton city No, #4 Belknap 11/03/17 Missing AM info YES INCOMPLETE
Ferndale city
Ferrysburg city
Fife Lake village No, #1 Jennett 09/05/17 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
Flat Rock city
Flint city
Flushing city
Forestville village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 10/09/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fountain village
Fowler village
5 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Fowlerville village
Frankenmuth city Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Frankfort city
Franklin village
Fraser city
Freeport village No, #3 Belknap 09/19/17 Needs Status Update YES INCOMPLETE
Freesoil village No, #1 Jennett 08/28/17 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
Fremont city Approved Belknap 11/03/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Fruitport village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gaastra city
Gagetown village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gaines village No, #3 Belknap 11/03/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Galesburg city
Galien village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Garden village
Garden City city
Gaylord city
Gibraltar city
Gladstone city Approved Belknap 11/09/17 11/09/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gladwin city Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Gobles city
Goodrich village
Grand Beach village
Grand Blanc city No, #3 Belknap 09/19/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Grand Haven city
Grand Ledge city
Grand Rapids city
Grandville city
Grant city Approved Belknap 10/16/17 10/16/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grass Lake village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Grayling city
Greenville city
Grosse Pointe city
Grosse Pointe Farms city
Grosse Pointe Park city Approved Belknap 11/09/17 11/09/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
6 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Grosse Pointe Woods city Approved Belknap 10/16/17 10/16/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hamtramck city
Hancock city
Hanover village Approved Jennett 07/24/17 09/11/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Completed YES COMPLETE
Harbor Beach city Approved Belknap 06/23/17 11/21/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Compete YES COMPLETE
Harbor Springs city
Harper Woods city
Harrietta village
Harrison city
Harrisville city No, #3 Belknap 07/24/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Hart city
Hartford city
Hastings city
Hazel Park city
Hersey village
Hesperia village No, #1 Jennett 09/28/17 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
Highland Park city
Hillman village Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Completed YES COMPLETE
Hillsdale city
Holland city
Holly village
Homer village
Honor village
Hopkins village
Houghton city No, #3 Belknap 11/09/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Howard City village No, #3 Belknap 07/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Howell city
Hubbardston village No, #3 Jennett 08/21/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Hudson city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Hudsonville city
Huntington Woods city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Imlay City city No, #4 Belknap 10/10/17 Missing AM info YES COMPLETE
Inkster city
Ionia city
Iron Mountain city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/06/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
7 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Iron River city
Ironwood city
Ishpeming city
Ithaca city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs Bridge Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Jackson city No, #3 Belknap 11/09/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Jonesville village
Kalamazoo city
Kaleva village
Kalkaska village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Keego Harbor city
Kent City village Approved Belknap 05/12/17 05/30/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kentwood city
Kinde village Approved Belknap 05/12/17 06/02/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kingsford city
Kingsley village Approved McNichol 06/23/17 02/23/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Kingston village Belknap 05/12/17 05/12/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Laingsburg city
Lake Angelus city
Lake Ann village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Completed YES COMPLETE
Lake City city Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Completed YES COMPLETE
Lake Linden village
Lake Odessa village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lake Orion village
Lakeview village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 11/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lakewood Club village Approved Jennett 07/14/17 09/12/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Completed YES COMPLETE
Lanse village
Lansing city
Lapeer city
Lathrup Village city
Laurium village Approved Belknap 09/07/17 09/07/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lawrence village No, #3 Jennett 09/05/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Lawton village Approved McNIchol 06/23/17 06/23/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lennon village
Leonard village
Leroy village
8 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Leslie city Approved Belknap 11/09/17 11/13/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lexington village
Lincoln village Approved Jennett 08/22/17 08/22/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lincoln Park city
Linden city
Litchfield city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/03/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Livonia city
Lowell city
Ludington city
Luna Pier city
Luther village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Lyons village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
McBain city Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
McBride village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mackinac Island city Approved Jennett 08/21/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mackinaw City village Approved Belknap 08/22/17 10/11/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Madison Heights city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Mancelona village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Manchester village Approved Belknap 11/09/17 11/09/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Manistee city
Manistique city
Manton city
Maple Rapids village
Marcellus village
Marine City city No, #4 Belknap 11/09/17 Missing AM info YES INCOMPLETE
Marion village
Marlette city Approved Jennett 08/22/17 08/22/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marquette city
Marshall city
Martin village Approved Belknap 07/24/17 07/24/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Marysville city
Mason city Approved Belknap 11/09/17 11/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mattawan village
Maybee village
Mayville village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
9 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Mecosta village
Melvin village Approved Belknap 07/17/17 07/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Melvindale city
Memphis city
Mendon village Approved Belknap 07/24/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Menominee city
Merrill village Approved Jennett 08/22/17 09/07/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mesick village Approved Belknap 05/12/17 10/12/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES INCOMPLETE
Metamora village No, #4 Belknap 10/10/17 Missing AM info YES COMPLETE
Michiana village
Middleville village
Midland city
Milan city
Milford village Approved Belknap 09/19/17 09/19/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Millersburg village Approved Belknap 07/24/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Millington village Approved Belknap 06/02/17 7/24/2017 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Minden City village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Monroe city
Montague city Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/2017 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Montgomery village No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Montrose city
Morenci city Approved Belknap 11/13/17 11/13/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Morley village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Morrice village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Mt Clemens city
Mt Morris city
Mt Pleasant city
Muir village
Mulliken village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/19/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Munising city
Muskegon city
Muskegon Heights city
Nashville village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Negaunee city
Newaygo city No, #3 Belknap 11/13/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
10 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
New Baltimore city
Newberry village
New Buffalo city
New Era village
New Haven village
New Lothrop village Approved Jennett 08/21/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Niles city
North Adams village No, #3 Belknap 09/11/17 No Data YES INCOMPLETE
North Branch village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
North Muskegon city
Northport village Approved Belknap 09/05/17 11/21/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Northville city Approved Belknap 11/13/17 11/13/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Norton Shores city
Norway city Approved Belknap 10/16/17 10/16/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Novi city
Oakley village No, #3 Belknap 09/19/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Oak Park city
Olivet city
Omer city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Onaway city Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Onekama village No, #3 Belknap 07/14/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Onsted village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ontonagon village
Orchard Lake city
Ortonville village No, #3 Belknap 11/13/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Otisville village
Otsego city
Otter Lake village Approved McNichol 06/23/17 06/23/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ovid village
Owendale village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Owosso city
Oxford village
Parchment city
Parma village Approved Belknap 10/03/17 10/03/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Paw Paw village
11 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Peck village Approved McNichol 06/02/17 06/02/17 ADARS Spreadsheet ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pellston village Approved Jennett 09/28/17 09/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pentwater village Approved Jennett 08/21/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Perrinton village No, #3 Belknap 07/24/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Perry city Approved Belknap 11/13/17 11/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Petersburg city
Petoskey city
Pewamo village Approved Belknap 09/19/17 09/19/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pierson village No, #1 Belknap 10/10/17 No Data No INCOMPLETE
Pigeon village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 11/13/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Pinckney village
Pinconning city
Plainwell city
Pleasant Ridge city
Plymouth city
Pontiac city
Portage city
Port Austin village
Port Hope village Approved Belknap 09/19/17 11/14/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Port Huron city
Portland city
Port Sanilac village
Posen village
Potterville city
Powers village Approved Jennett 08/21/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Prescott village
Quincy village
Ravenna village
Reading city
Reed City city No, #4 Jennett 09/28/17 Missing AM info YES INCOMPLETE
Reese village Approved Belknap 09/19/17 10/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Richland village Approved Belknap 08/22/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Richmond city Approved Belknap 10/16/17 10/16/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
River Rouge city
Riverview city
12 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Rochester city
Rochester Hills city
Rockford city
Rockwood city
Rogers City city
Romeo village
Romulus city
Roosevelt Park city
Roscommon village
Rosebush village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 11/22/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Rose City city
Roseville city
Rothbury village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Royal Oak city
Saginaw city
St Charles village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/18/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
St Clair city
St Clair Shores city
St Ignace city
St Johns city
St Joseph city
St Louis city
Saline city
Sand Lake village No, #3 Jennett 08/21/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Sandusky city Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sanford village
Saranac village Approved Jennett 07/17/17 08/21/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Saugatuck city
Sault Ste Marie city
Schoolcraft village No, #3 Belknap 07/14/17 Needs Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Scottville city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Need Status Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Sebewaing village Approved Belknap 08/21/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shelby village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shepherd village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/20/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sheridan village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 11/09/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
13 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Sherwood village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Shoreham village
Southfield city
Southgate city
South Haven city
South Lyon city
South Range village No, #1 Jennett 09/28/17 No Data NO INCOMPLETE
South Rockwood village
Sparta village
Springfield city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Spring Lake village
Springport village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Standish city
Stanton city
Stanwood village Approved Jennett 08/28/17 08/28/17 ADARS AM done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stephenson city
Sterling village Approved Belknap 07/24/17 10/18/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sterling Heights city
Stevensville village Approved Belknap 10/10/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Stockbridge village Approved Jennett 09/05/17 09/05/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Sturgis city
Sunfield village No, #3 McNichol 06/02/17 Status Needs Updateing YES INCOMPLETE
Suttons Bay village
Swartz Creek city No, #3 Belknap 11/13/17 Needs Statu Updated YES INCOMPLETE
Sylvan Lake city
Tawas City city Approved Belknap 11/13/17 11/22/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Taylor city
Tecumseh city
Tekonsha village Approved Jennette 07/14/17 10/23/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Thompsonville village No, #4 Belknap 10/10/17 Missing AM info YES COMPLETE
Three Oaks village
Three Rivers city
Traverse City city Approved Belknap 11/09/17 11/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Trenton city No, #4 Belknap 10/10/17 Missing AM info YES COMPLETE
Troy city
14 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Turner village
Tustin village Approved McNichol 06/23/17 06/23/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Twining village Approved Belknap 09/19/17 10/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Ubly village Approved Belknap 07/14/17 07/14/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Union City village Approved Belknap 11/07/17 11/07/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Unionville village Approved Belknap 08/22/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Utica city
Vandalia village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/10/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Vanderbilt village
Vassar city
Vermontville village
Vernon village No, #4 Belknap 10/10/17 Missing AM info YES COMPLETE
Vicksburg village
Village of Clarkston city
The Village of Grosse Pocity
Village of Lake Isabella village
Wakefield city
Waldron village Approved Jennett 08/22/17 08/22/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Walker city
Walkerville village Approved Belknap 08/28/17 10/18/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Walled Lake city
Warren city
Watervliet city Approved Belknap 11/02/17 11/02/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wayland city
Wayne city
Webberville village
West Branch city
Westland city
Westphalia village Approved Belknap 07/10/17 07/19/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
White Cloud city
Whitehall city
White Pigeon village Approved Belknap 10/17/17 10/17/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Whittemore city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs status updated YES INCOMPLETE
Williamston city Approved Belknap 11/13/17 11/13/17 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wixom city No, #3 Belknap 10/10/17 Needs status updated YES INCOMPLETE
15 of 16
Investment Reporting Compliance As of 11‐22‐17 Fiscal Year 2017
Wolverine village Approved Jennett 08/22/17 8/22/2017 ADARS AM Done ‐ IRT Complete YES COMPLETE
Wolverine Lake village
Woodhaven city
Woodland village
Wyandotte city
Wyoming city
Yale city
Ypsilanti city
Zeeland city
Zilwaukee city
16 of 16
TAMC 2017 - 2019 Work Program
Data Committee Priorities, December 2017
Tasks Status
Priority
(high,
medium,
low)
NotesWork Product
Communications
2Research cost-effectiveness of data
collection effort
Refer to Data Committee for
recommendation?
Focus efforts to collect plans from
top 124
Refer to Data Committee for
recommendation?
ReportRefer to Data committee for
recommendation?
Current state, projection &
recommended changes.
3 ForecastingReview new IRT data for forecasting
tools
Refer to Data committee for
recommendation?
Compare & analyze AM plans & data
from IRT with PASER and Bridge data
Data committee reviewed list of
submitted AM plans in October;
further discussion needed?
Data Comm should discuss the need
to analyze condition data more
thoroughly & consistently
DA
TA C
OLL
ECTI
ON
Review Collection
Methods &
Reimbursement Policy
for FA and Non-FA
Networks (Paved &
Unpaved)
Asset Management
Plans
PR
OJE
CT
&
INV
ESTM
E
Fields Inquiring
about AM Process
DA
TA A
NA
LYSI
S &
RES
AER
CH
Data Storage &
Design Reports -
Recommendations
for Optimal Use