Data-based Decision Making: Analyzing Enrollment Data.
-
Upload
dominic-ball -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Data-based Decision Making: Analyzing Enrollment Data.
Data-based Decision Making:Analyzing Enrollment Data
PPS Enrollment Trends: 1995-2004
47,918
57,266
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Enrollment estimated to level off to about 44,000 students by 2010*
*Population Research Center, Portland State University, August 2004
PPS Enrollment Trends for Elementary Schools: 1995-2004
21,560
26,727
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
PPS Enrollment Trends for Middle Schools: 1995-2004
9,447
11,883
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
PPS Enrollment Trends for High Schools: 1995-2004
12,797
13,481
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Elementary Schools with Major Enrollment Shifts
Capitol Hill – 9.6%Boise Eliot – 10.3%Chief Joseph – 12.0%Vernon – 13.3 %Lee – 14.0%Scott – 14.3%Creston – 18.3%Kenton – 25.3%Applegate – 30.8%
Forest Park – 13.3%
Hayhurst – 66.5%
Sunnyside Environ. – 126.1%
Fernwood – 9.6%
Ockley Green – 9.8%
Gregory Heights – 12.4%
Whitaker – 14.3%
Tubman – 20.6%
Middle Schools with Major Enrollment Shifts
Decrease in births rate since 1981, (constant 5,600-5,800 annual birth rate since 1993).
Fewer school-age children.
Fewer young families moving into Portland than moving out.
More affordable family housing available outside Portland.
Residents are aging in-place.Barry Edmonston, Population Research Center, Portland State University, October 2004
What is causing declines in enrollment?
Most families with school-age children are still choosing Portland Public Schools – (84% capture rate)
What remains constant?
Barry Edmonston, Population Research Center, Portland State University, October 2004
What is happening in other districts?
Between 1990 and 2000, 7 Multnomah County school districts gained residents, paced by mid and east county
districts.
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Population: percentage change 1990-2000
REYNOLDS DAVIDDOUGLAS
GRESHAM-BARLOW
CENTENNIAL PARKROSE
RIVERDALE
PPS CORBETT
From Report to the Leader’s Roundtable Update on Multnomah County 3 rd Grade Reading Initiative, Sept. 28, 2004
What is happening in other districts?
PPS lost households with children while districts to the east, led strongly by Reynolds, gained them.
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
REYNOLDS DAVIDDOUGLAS
GRESHAM-BARLOW
CENTENNIAL PARKROSE RIVERDALE
PPS CORBETT
Households with children: percentage change 1990-2000
From Report to the Leader’s Roundtable Update on Multnomah County 3 rd Grade Reading Initiative, Sept. 28, 2004
Criteria for Addressing Growth in School Enrollments
Elementary and middle schools with 30 or more students above their ADM (average daily membership).
High schools with enrollments greater than the ADM used for staffing of 75 or more students.
Developed by Dr. Patricia Pickles and Area Directors
Other Considerations
Not all positions were allocated given the current financial uncertainties.
Staff work with schools to develop options (such as blends) when enrollment is high at one or two grade levels.
Area Directors have discretion to make small adjustments within clusters.
Additional Staff Allocations (To date)
School FTE
Forest Park Elementary School 1.3
Franklin High School 3.0
Grant High School 0.5
TOTAL 4.8
Addressing Decreases in School Enrollment: Critical Questions
What makes for effective schools (based on research and good practice)? Academic programming
Efficient use of resources
Size and learning environment
What’s the Tipping Point? School Initiation and Closure Policy
Implementation Steps