DASC: Dense Adaptive Self-Correlation IEEE 2015 Conference ... · IEEE 2015 Conference on Computer...

1
IEEE 2015 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition DASC: Dense Adaptive Self-Correlation for Multi-modal and Multi-spectral Correspondence Seungryong Kim, Dongbo Min, Bumsub Ham, Seungchul Ryu, Minh N. Do, and Kwanghoon Sohn Download the code at http://seungryong.github.io/DASC/ Introduction DASC Descriptor Experimental Results Conclusion Motivation In multi-modal and multi-spectral image, conventional descriptors often fail to estimate correspondence Goal To establish dense correspondence for those images NIR Visible No-flash Flash Low exp. High exp. Blur Sharp Randomized Receptive Field Pooling Unlike center-biased max pooling in LSS descriptor, the DASC descriptor incorporates randomized receptive field pooling Sampling Pattern Learning Exploit supports vector machine (SVM) with linear kernel Features: Energy function for SVM Small Support Window Similarity Adaptive self-correlation measure Efficient Computation Asymmetric weights Reference-biased sampling pairs Approximated adaptive self-correlation Middlebury Stereo Benchmark Multi-modal and Multi-spectral Image Pairs Background Img 1 Img 2 color, gradient, structural similarity RGB Image NIR Image Matching Cost A Matching Cost B Matching Cost C Challenge on Multi-modal Images Nonlinear photometric deformation, e.g., gradient reverses and intensity order variations LSS descriptor DASC descriptor Middlebury multi-modal SINTEL 1 2 2 2 , , , exp ( ) /2 ml ml ml r r d d 2 () || || max(0,1 ( )) m m m v v y r Intuitions Center-biased pooling sensitive to noise Randomness of BRIEF LSS , bin ( ) max (,) i il j l d ij LSS descriptor DASC descriptor , , , , , ( , ), , il il il il il i d s t s t , , , 2 2 , , ( )( ) (,) { ( )} { ( )} ss tt s s t t st ss s s tt t t s t f f st f f , , , 2 2 , , , , ( )( ) (,) ( ) ( ) ii i i j ij i j ii i i ii j ij i i j f f ij f f ,' ss , , ( ) (, - ) , il il t j i s i i Robust estimation (,) max(exp( (1 ( , ))/ ), ) st st The correlation is normalized with norm of all (,) st l Img1 Img2 RSNCC BRIEF DAISY LSS DASC RGB-NIR flash-no flash different exposure blur-sharp Robust novel descriptor called the DASC for multi-modal correspondence Leverages adaptive self-correlation and randomized receptive pooling Efficient computation with fast edge-aware filters Limitation of Conventional Descriptors Image gradient (SIFT) or intensity comparison (BRIEF) cannot capture coherent matching evidence Img1 Img2 ANCC BRIEF SIFT LSS DASC Ground Truth Illumination Exposure

Transcript of DASC: Dense Adaptive Self-Correlation IEEE 2015 Conference ... · IEEE 2015 Conference on Computer...

Page 1: DASC: Dense Adaptive Self-Correlation IEEE 2015 Conference ... · IEEE 2015 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition DASC: Dense Adaptive Self-Correlation for Multi-modal

IEEE 2015 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern

Recognition

DASC: Dense Adaptive Self-Correlation for Multi-modal and Multi-spectral Correspondence Seungryong Kim, Dongbo Min, Bumsub Ham, Seungchul Ryu, Minh N. Do, and Kwanghoon Sohn

Download the code at http://seungryong.github.io/DASC/

Introduction DASC Descriptor Experimental Results

Conclusion

Motivation • In multi-modal and multi-spectral image, conventional

descriptors often fail to estimate correspondence

Goal • To establish dense correspondence for those images

NIR

Visible

No-flash

Flash

Low exp.

High exp.

Blur

Sharp

Randomized Receptive Field Pooling • Unlike center-biased max pooling in LSS descriptor, the DASC descriptor incorporates

randomized receptive field pooling

Sampling Pattern Learning • Exploit supports vector machine (SVM)

with linear kernel • Features: • Energy function for SVM

Small Support Window Similarity • Adaptive self-correlation measure

Efficient Computation • Asymmetric weights • Reference-biased sampling pairs

• Approximated adaptive self-correlation

Middlebury Stereo Benchmark

Multi-modal and Multi-spectral Image Pairs

Background

Img

1

Img

2

color, gradient, structural similarity

RGB Image NIR Image

Matching Cost A Matching Cost B Matching Cost C

Challenge on Multi-modal Images • Nonlinear photometric deformation, e.g., gradient

reverses and intensity order variations

LSS descriptor DASC descriptor

Middlebury multi-modal SINTEL

1 2 2 2, , ,exp ( ) / 2m l m l m l rr d d

2( ) || || max(0,1 ( ))m mmv v y r

• Intuitions Center-biased pooling

sensitive to noise Randomness of BRIEF

LSS, bin ( )max ( , )

ii l j ld i j

LSS descriptor

DASC descriptor

, , , , ,( , ), ,i l i l i l i l i l id s t s t

, ,,

2 2, ,

( )( )

( , ){ ( )} { ( )}

s s t t s s t ts t

s s s s t t t ts t

f f

s tf f

, ,,

2 2, , ,

,

( )( )

( , )( ) ( )

i i i i j i ji j

i i i i i i j i ji i j

f f

i jf f

, 's s

, ,( ) ( , - ), i l i ltj i si i

• Robust estimation

( , ) max(exp( (1 ( , )) / ), )s t s t • The correlation is normalized

with norm of all

( , )s t

l

Img1 Img2

RSNCC

BRIEF

DAISY

LSS

DASC

RGB-NIR flash-no flash different exposure blur-sharp

• Robust novel descriptor called the DASC for multi-modal correspondence • Leverages adaptive self-correlation and randomized receptive pooling • Efficient computation with fast edge-aware filters

Limitation of Conventional Descriptors • Image gradient (SIFT) or intensity comparison (BRIEF)

cannot capture coherent matching evidence

Img1 Img2 ANCC BRIEF

SIFT LSS DASC Ground Truth Illumination Exposure