A Carrier Protein Strategy Yields the Structure of Dalbavancin
Dalbavancin Journal Club
Transcript of Dalbavancin Journal Club
Jauregui LE, Babazadeh S, Seltzer E, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of once-weekly dalbavancin
versus twice-daily linezolid therapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.
CID. 2005;41:1407-1415.
Journal ClubAmy Yeh
PharmD CandidateClass of 2015
November 21, 2014
Abbreviations Abx: antibiotic(s) MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus SSSI: skin and skin structure
infection(s) MOA: mechanism of action IV: intravenous HD: hemodialysis Pt: patient(s) Tx: treat(s)/treating/treatment(s)
Abbreviations CrCl: creatinine clearance TOC: test-of-cure PO: oral F/u: follow-up ADRs: adverse drug reactions Rxn: reaction(s) Vs: versus DDIs: drug-drug interactions
What is Dalbavancin? A new abx
› Semi-synthetic lipoglycopeptide› Marketed as Dalvance
Properties› MOA: Disrupts cell wall synthesis› Half-life: 8.5 days› Bactericidal activity
Gram (+), including MRSA
Structure
http://www.google.com/patents/US8143212
Place in Therapy FDA approved for adults
› Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) Staphylococcus aureus
including MRSA Streptococcus pyogenes Streptococcus agalactiae Streptococcus anginosus
Dosing Normal renal function
› 1000 mg IV, then 500 mg IV a week later› Infuse over 30 minutes
Prevent infusion rxns Renal dosing
› CrCl < 30 (no HD) 750 mg IV, then 375 mg IV a week later
› If HD, no special dosing required
Pros Resistance
› Novel drug --> Not a concern Safety
› No known DDIs› Few ADRs › Pregnancy Category C
Convenience› Only 2 doses required› Outpatient tx is an option
Cons Expensive
› Cost comparable to linezolid› May be offset by the drug's advantages
IV only› For pts who insist on PO tx, linezolid would
be a better option
The Study Objective
› Demonstrate safety and efficacy of dalbavancin vs. linezolid for tx adults with complicated SSSI
Rationale› Growing antimicrobial resistance
Prevalence of MRSA in SSSI Alternative abx needed
› Medication adherence is key to success
Outcomes Primary
› Clinical success rate of the "clinically evaluable" pts at TOC Success: enough improvement that abx no
longer needed Clinically evaluable: tx for 3+ days, attended
all visits, followed directions/met all criteria TOC visit within 2 days after completion of tx
› Rate of ADRs in each tx arm Secondary: not clearly defined
Inclusion Criteria Adults with complicated SSSI
› Gram(+) etiology› Systemic infection -> initial IV tx required
PLUS ≥ 2 of the following› Drainage/discharge› Erythema› Warmth› Tenderness› Swelling/induration
Complicated SSSI Infection involves deeper layers of
tissue (or requires surgery)› Severe abscess› Burn › Wound infection› Extensive/ulcerating cellulitis
OR Infection where MRSA may be present
Exclusion Criteria Osteomyelitis/septic arthritis
› Require tx >14 days Infection requiring 3+ surgeries
› Indicate presence of other complications Concomitant abx tx
› Aztreonam/metronidazole permitted for mixed infections
› D/c when gram (-) coverage no longer needed
Study Design Non-inferiority
› Delta: -12.5% Parallel Randomized via computer system Double-blind Duration: 14 days of tx Multi-center
› USA, Latvia, Lithuania, Canada, UK, Estonia, Germany
Tx Arms Dalbavancin
› 1000 mg IV on day 1, then 500 mg IV on day 8
Linezolid› 600 mg every 12 hrs for 14 days› IV to PO after 24 hrs
Blinding› IV infusions bid until switch to PO› IV infusion of medication on day 8
The Participants Total enrollment
› 851 individuals› 571 (dalbavancin) vs. 283 (linezolid)
Clinically evaluable at TOC› Analyzed for primary outcome› 660 individuals› 434 (dalbavancin) vs. 226 (linezolid)
Statistics/Results Efficacy
› Clinical success rate at TOC 88.9% (dalbavancin) vs. 91.2% (linezolid)
› Lower limit of confidence interval -7.28% Did not cross delta margin of -12.5%
Non-inferiority was claimed
Statistics/Results Safety
› ADRs similar between tx arms› Both meds well tolerated
GI distress most common› Thrombocytopenia
0.2% on dalbavancin, 2.5% on linezolid› Infusion rxns
2.8% on dalbavancin, 3.9% on linezolid
Critique of Strengths Methods
› Appropriate dosing regimens Per IDSA guidelines
› Adequate blinding/randomization Inclusion/exclusion criteria
› Abx with gram (+) activity not permitted› Pts requiring extended tx were excluded
Critique of Strengths Tx arms
› Similar baseline characteristics› Good representation of SSSI types
Assessments› Thorough evaluations
Infection status Labs/cultures/vitals ADRs
› Excellent f/u with pts
Limitations/Confounders Delta margin (-12.5%)
› 10% is the standard› Rationale for generous delta not mentioned
Statistics› What tests were used?› Missing p-values/confidence intervals› Power not addressed
Med adherence not assessed
Limitations/Confounders Tx arms
› 2x as many subjects on dalbavancin Rationale for disparity not explained
Ancillary meds› DDIs of linezolid not considered
Potentially problematic meds permitted Serotonin syndrome? Increased BP?
Could explain the higher rate of ADRs
Relevance of Study Statistical/clinical significance
Missing data Unable to claim non-inferiority
Clinical relevance› High clinical success rate (88.9%)
demonstrates efficacy of dalbavancin› Alternative to linezolid for complicated
SSSI
When to Use Dalbavancin MRSA concern
› Suspected resistance to other drugs Convenience
› Outpatient tx› Only two IV doses required
Safety› When DDIs are a concern› For elderly, renal/hepatic/pregnant/lactating
References Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. IDSA Practice
guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. CID. 2005;41:1373-406.
Jauregui LE, Babazadeh S, Seltzer E, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of once-weekly dalbavancin versus twice-daily linezolid therapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. CID. 2005;41:1407-1415.
Moran GJ, Abrahamian FM, LoVecchio F, Talan DA. Acute bacterial skin infections: Developments since the 2005 IDSA guidelines. Journal Emergency Med. 2013;44:397-412.
Dalvance package insert. Revised May 2014. Accessed at www.duratatherapeutics.com on November 14, 2014.