Daily Report Tuesday, 26 February 2019 CONTENTS€¦ · Daily Report Tuesday, 26 February 2019 ......
Transcript of Daily Report Tuesday, 26 February 2019 CONTENTS€¦ · Daily Report Tuesday, 26 February 2019 ......
Daily Report Tuesday, 26 February 2019
This report shows written answers and statements provided on 26 February 2019 and the
information is correct at the time of publication (06:36 P.M., 26 February 2019). For the latest
information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements,
please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/
CONTENTS
ANSWERS 5
BUSINESS, ENERGY AND
INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 5
Conditions of Employment: EU
Countries 5
Gratuities: Unfair Practices 5
Minimum Wage: Voluntary
Work 6
Nuclear Power Stations:
Cumbria and North Wales 6
Nuclear Power Stations: North
West 8
Post Office: ICT 9
Retail Trade: Certification
Quality Marks 9
Secondhand Goods:
Certification Quality Marks 10
CABINET OFFICE 11
Cabinet Office: Consultants 11
Children: Paracetamol 11
Females: Pay 12
Government Departments:
Procurement 12
Prime Minister: Apprentices 12
DEFENCE 13
Ministry of Defence: Civil
Partnerships and Marriage 13
Ministry of Defence:
Procurement 14
Nuclear Weapons:
International Law 14
Veterans 14
Veterans: Identity Cards 15
DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND
SPORT 15
Football: Finance 15
Football: Schools 16
Football: Sportsgrounds 16
EDUCATION 17
Carers: Children 17
Carers: Children and Young
People 17
Child Trust Fund 18
Children: Day Care 18
European University Institute 19
Graduates: Employment 20
Pre-school Education: Finance 21
Pre-school Education: Free
School Meals 22
Pupils: Disadvantaged 23
Pupils: Hearing Impairment 23
Schools: Social Workers 24
Small Businesses: Apprentices 24
Soft Drinks: Taxation 25
Special Educational Needs:
Staff 25
T-levels: Science 26
T-levels: Work Experience 26
UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child 27
Universities: Degrees 27
Young People: Unemployment 27
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND
RURAL AFFAIRS 29
Agriculture: Children 29
Agriculture: Subsidies 29
Dairy Farming 30
Equine Flu: Disease Control 30
Non-native Species: EU Law 31
Pets: Travel 32
Rural Payments Agency:
Geospatial Commission 32
Salmon: Scotland 33
Tyres: Recycling 33
EXITING THE EUROPEAN
UNION 34
Department for Exiting the
European Union: Procurement 34
FOREIGN AND
COMMONWEALTH OFFICE 34
[Subject Heading to be
Assigned] 34
Central European University 34
Elections 35
Foreign and Commonwealth
Office: Procurement 35
Human Rights 35
India: Pakistan 36
Iran: Press TV 36
Iraq: Politics and Government 36
Kashmir: Terrorism 36
Press Freedom 37
Sierra Leone: Politics and
Government 37
Sudan: Economic Situation 37
Three Seas Initiative 38
Venezuela: Money Laundering 38
Venezuela: Presidents 39
Yemen: Conflict Resolution 40
Yemen: Security 40
HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE 40
Abortion 40
Accident and Emergency
Departments: Standards 41
Ambulance Services: East
Midlands 41
Ambulance Services:
Standards 41
Asthma: Prescriptions 42
Cancer: Health Professions 42
Cervical Cancer: Screening 43
Continuing Care 43
Continuing Care: Finance 44
Dental Services: Cumbria 45
Eating Disorders: Health
Services 45
Epilepsy: Drugs 46
Exercise 47
Fibromyalgia 47
General Practitioners:
Overseas Companies 47
Health Services: British
Nationals Abroad 47
Health Services: Greater
London 48
Health Services: Reciprocal
Arrangements 49
Heart Diseases: Transplant
Surgery 50
HIV Infection: Drugs 50
Hospitals: Cash Dispensing 51
Hospitals: Waiting Lists 51
Integrated Care Systems:
Hampshire and Isle of Wight 52
Mental Illness: Community
Care 52
NHS: DHL 53
NHS: Drugs 53
NHS: Fees and Charges 54
NHS: Negligence 55
Non-ionizing Radiation 55
Pain: Medical Treatments 56
Postnatal Depression 57
Rare Diseases: Drugs 57
St James Hospital Portsmouth 58
HOME OFFICE 58
British Nationality: EU
Nationals 58
Cannabis: Medical Treatments 58
Deportation: West Africa 59
Diamorphine: Glasgow 59
Domestic Abuse 59
Early Intervention Youth Fund 60
English Language:
Assessments 61
Fire and Rescue Services:
Labour Mobility 61
Fire and Rescue Services:
Staff 61
Fraud: Prosecutions 61
Immigration Controls:
Commonwealth 62
Immigration: EEA Nationals 63
Immigration: EU Nationals 63
Knives: Crime 65
Organised Crime 66
Police Patrolling 67
Police: Finance 67
Police: Managers 68
Prisoners: Repatriation 68
Yarl's Wood Immigration
Removal Centre: Per Capita
Costs 69
HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT 69
Buildings: Insulation 69
Citizens' Juries 71
Homelessness: Finance 71
Housing Infrastructure Fund 71
Housing: Construction 72
Housing: Prices 72
Local Government Finance 72
Local Government Services 73
Local Plans 74
Planning Inspectorate 74
Planning: Skilled Workers 75
Private Rented Housing 75
Sleeping Rough 76
INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT 76
Africa: Tax Evasion 76
Africa: Taxation 77
Alan Guttmacher Institute 77
Developing Countries: UK
Relations with EU 78
Niger: Marie Stopes
International 78
Overseas Aid 78
INTERNATIONAL TRADE 79
Food: Import Duties 79
Trade Agreements 79
Trade Agreements: NHS 79
World Trade Organisation:
Reform 80
JUSTICE 81
Cannabis: Misuse 81
Feltham Young Offender
Institution 81
Ministry of Justice: Bullying 82
Veterans: Prison Sentences 88
Young Offenders:
Rehabilitation 89
TRANSPORT 89
Crossrail Line 89
Department for Transport:
Contracts 90
High Speed Two 90
High Speed Two Railway Line:
Buckinghamshire 91
High Speed Two: Staff 92
Midland Main Railway Line:
Electrification 93
National College for High
Speed Rail 94
Network Rail: Expenditure 95
TREASURY 95
Asset Protection Agency 95
Child Benefit 96
Equitable Life Assurance
Society: Compensation 96
Foreign Investment in UK 97
Government Departments:
Procurement 97
Homelessness: Finance 97
Investment: Fraud 98
Royal Bank of Scotland 98
WOMEN AND EQUALITIES 99
Political Parties: Equality 99
WORK AND PENSIONS 99
Children: Day Care 99
Children: Maintenance 100
Food Banks 100
Unemployment: Ethnic Groups 100
Universal Credit 101
Universal Credit:
Disqualification 102
WRITTEN STATEMENTS 103
CABINET OFFICE 103
EU Exit Update 103
FOREIGN AND
COMMONWEALTH OFFICE 103
Entering into force of the
Prespa Agreement and North
Macedonia’s NATO Accession 103
Notes:
Questions marked thus [R] indicate that a relevant interest has been declared.
Questions with identification numbers of 900000 or greater indicate that the question was originally tabled as an
oral question and has since been unstarred.
ANSWERS
BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY
Conditions of Employment: EU Countries
Justin Madders: [222618]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether the
European Court of Justice will have jurisdiction over a claim brought by a UK national
under the Transfer of Undertaking Regulations 2006 in the event that the UK leaves the
EU without a deal and that national's employment transfers under the regulations from a
UK employer to an employer in an EU member state.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The EU Withdrawal Act 2018 established that if the UK leaves the EU without a deal
UK courts and tribunals will no longer be able to refer cases to the Court of Justice of
the European Union (CJEU) on or after exit day. Decisions of the CJEU made on or
after exit day will not be binding on UK courts and tribunals, but judges may take
these judgments into account if it is relevant to the matter before them. This principle
will apply to claims brought in the UK under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection
of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE).
As is the case before exit, an employment claim against an employer in another EU
Member State (i.e. not the UK) may be brought in that country under its relevant
national legislation. This will depend on the facts and circumstances of a particular
case.
Gratuities: Unfair Practices
Sir David Crausby: [222636]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, when his
Department plans to bring forward legislative proposals to tackle unfair practices in the
hospitality sector in relation to (a) tips, (b) gratuities, (c) cover charges and (d) service
charges.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Government has announced its intention to legislate to ensure that all tips left to
workers are kept by them in full. In some sectors, tips are a significant part of staff
income. It is only right that workers keep the full value of tips left in recognition of
good service and hard work.
This commitment was published as part of the Government’s Good Work Plan, which
represents the largest upgrade to workplace rights in a generation. Full details of
legislation on tips will be published in due course.
Minimum Wage: Voluntary Work
Damian Green: [222587]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
amendments have been made to the guidance relating to section 44 of the National
Minimum Wage Act 1998 since its enactment.
Damian Green: [222588]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether there
was a public consultation in support of the development of guidance relating to section 44
of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
Damian Green: [222589]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether the
Government plans to amend the guidance relating to section 44 of the National Minimum
Wage Act 1998; and if he will make a statement.
Kelly Tolhurst:
Section 44 of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 sets out a specific exemption
that applies to voluntary workers. People volunteering for charities, voluntary
organisations and other relevant organisations contribute a huge value to society,
and they do so without an expectation of being paid the National Minimum Wage.
Guidance is available on gov.uk to support charitable and other relevant
organisations in determining when voluntary workers are covered by the exemption.
This is contained in ‘Calculating the Minimum Wage’, which was first published in
April 2013 and can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/calculating-the-minimum-wage
This guidance on when voluntary workers are exempt from the National Minimum
Wage has not been the subject of a formal consultation and there are no immediate
plans to amend it. If the Department receives representations that show there is a
need for improved guidance we would consider these carefully.
Nuclear Power Stations: Cumbria and North Wales
Tim Farron: [222726]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what plans he
has to support North West Nuclear Arc innovation partnerships in enabling the next
phase of nuclear generation development in (a) Cumbria and (b) North Wales.
Richard Harrington:
Last year, the North West Nuclear Arc completed a Science and Innovation Audit
(SIA), a BEIS sponsored project, that mapped the strengths and opportunities in their
area. This will be published, with the other eleven Wave 3 SIAs, by BEIS in due
course.
Proposals for a £30 million national and regional nuclear supply chain and
productivity improvement programme, developed with participation from Local
Enterprise Partnerships in the North-West in conjunction with other parties, are
currently being considered by BEIS as part of the commitments within the Nuclear
Sector Deal.
The £180m Nuclear Innovation Programme which is part of the 2016-21, £505m
BEIS Energy Innovation Programme is part of the Nuclear Sector Deal. The
Programme covers the whole of the UK Nuclear Research and Development
community in order to develop and promote innovation and future growth in the
nuclear sector in the UK in conjunction with the Nuclear Sector Deal.
The Government welcomes the initiative of nuclear businesses, supply chain clusters,
universities and innovators across Cumbria, the wider North West, and North Wales
to work together through the North West Nuclear Arc.
We believe our policies through the Nuclear Sector Deal and Nuclear Innovation
Programme will support the North West Nuclear Arc to capitalise on the regions
historic strengths in the nuclear sector.
It was this Government that agreed a landmark Nuclear Sector Deal worth over
£200m, as well as giving the go-ahead to Hinkley Point C, the first new nuclear power
station in a generation.
Tim Farron: [222729]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he
plans to replicate the funding allocated to North Wales for the thermal hydraulics research
facility in Bangor with spending on the nuclear industry in Cumbria; and if he will make a
statement.
Richard Harrington:
The proposed Thermal Hydraulics facility in Bangor is part of the BEIS led Nuclear
Innovation Programme and is in its very early stages of development. The £180m
Nuclear Innovation Programme is part of the 2016-21, £505m BEIS Energy
Innovation Programme. The Programme covers the whole of the UK Nuclear
Research and Development community in order to develop and promote innovation
and future growth in the nuclear sector in the UK in conjunction with the Nuclear
Sector Deal.
The National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) is successfully delivering and playing a
leadership role on three streams of the Nuclear Innovation Programme; Advanced
Fuels, Recycle and Waste Management and Strategic Toolkit. All areas utilise key
nuclear skills and research infrastructure in the North West including Cumbria.
The NNL also invests in science and engineering programmes and skills using
earnings to reinvest which are implemented within North West universities, supply
chain and NNL facilities of which a large component is in Cumbria.
The Government welcomes the initiative of nuclear businesses, supply chain clusters,
universities and innovators across Cumbria, the wider North West, and North Wales
to work together through the North West Nuclear Arc.
We believe our policies through the Nuclear Sector Deal and Nuclear Innovation
Programme will support the North West Nuclear Arc to capitalise on the regions
historic strengths in the nuclear sector.
It was this Government that agreed a landmark Nuclear Sector Deal worth over
£200m, as well as giving the go-ahead to Hinkley Point C, the first new nuclear power
station in a generation.
Nuclear Power Stations: North West
Tim Farron: [222721]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent
discussions he has had with the North West Nuclear Arc on innovation and future growth
in new nuclear in the North West.
Richard Harrington:
Last year, the North West Nuclear Arc completed a Science and Innovation Audit
(SIA), a BEIS sponsored project, that mapped the strengths and opportunities in their
area. This will be published, with the other eleven Wave 3 SIAs, by BEIS in due
course.
Proposals for a £30 million national and regional nuclear supply chain and
productivity improvement programme, developed with participation from Local
Enterprise Partnerships in the North-West in conjunction with other parties, are
currently being considered by BEIS as part of the commitments within the Nuclear
Sector Deal.
The Government welcomes the initiative of nuclear businesses, supply chain clusters,
universities and innovators across Cumbria, the wider North West, and North Wales
to work together through the North West Nuclear Arc.
We believe our policies through the Nuclear Sector Deal and Nuclear Innovation
Programme will support the North West Nuclear Arc to capitalise on the regions
historic strengths in the nuclear sector.
It was this Government that agreed a landmark Nuclear Sector Deal worth over
£200m, as well as giving the go-ahead to Hinkley Point C, the first new nuclear power
station in a generation.
Tim Farron: [222722]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what plans he
has to work with the North West Nuclear Arc to develop innovation and future growth in
new nuclear in the North West.
Richard Harrington:
Last year, the North West Nuclear Arc completed a Science and Innovation Audit
(SIA), a BEIS sponsored project, that mapped the strengths and opportunities in their
area. This will be published, with the other eleven Wave 3 SIAs, by BEIS in due
course.
Proposals for a £30 million national and regional nuclear supply chain and
productivity improvement programme, developed with participation from Local
Enterprise Partnerships in the North-West in conjunction with other parties, are
currently being considered by BEIS as part of the commitments within the Nuclear
Sector Deal.
The £180m Nuclear Innovation Programme which is part of the 2016-21, £505m
BEIS Energy Innovation Programme is part of the Nuclear Sector Deal. The
Programme covers the whole of the UK Nuclear Research and Development
community in order to develop and promote innovation and future growth in the
nuclear sector in the UK in conjunction with the Nuclear Sector Deal.
The Government welcomes the initiative of nuclear businesses, supply chain clusters,
universities and innovators across Cumbria, the wider North West, and North Wales
to work together through the North West Nuclear Arc.
We believe our policies through the Nuclear Sector Deal and Nuclear Innovation
Programme will support the North West Nuclear Arc to capitalise on the regions
historic strengths in the nuclear sector.
It was this Government that agreed a landmark Nuclear Sector Deal worth over
£200m, as well as giving the go-ahead to Hinkley Point C, the first new nuclear power
station in a generation.
Post Office: ICT
Mr Ranil Jayawardena: [222063]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how much
money from the public purse has been spent on the Horizon IT High Court case to date.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Government recognises the critical role that post offices play in communities and
for small businesses across the UK. This is why the Government committed to
safeguard the post office network and protect existing rural services. The overall
number of post offices across the UK remains at its most stable in decades with over
11,500 branches thanks to significant Government investment of over £2 billion since
2010.
While the Post Office is publicly owned it operates as an independent, commercial
business. As such, the legal defence of this litigation and the costs involved in doing
so are being handled by Post Office Limited. As the litigation is ongoing in the High
Court, the Government is unable to comment further.
Retail Trade: Certification Quality Marks
Toby Perkins: [222757]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate
he has made of the period of time that will be provided to retailers to adapt to the
replacement of Conformité Européene markings in the event that the UK leaves the EU
without a deal.
Kelly Tolhurst:
In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, goods that are CE marked will
continue to be recognised for a time-limited period.
We recognise that adequate notice will need to be given to businesses of any change
to the period in order to enable them to adapt. In the event of no deal, we will consult
with businesses, including retailers, before taking any decision to end the period of
recognition.
Secondhand Goods: Certification Quality Marks
Toby Perkins: [222756]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
assessment he has made of the effect on (a) charity shops and (b) other second hand
retailers of plans to replace Conformité Européene markings with a UK mark in the event
that the UK leaves the EU without a deal.
Kelly Tolhurst:
In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, the Government is taking the
decision to adopt a continuity approach in some areas, such as CE marked products,
and continue to recognise CE marking as now. This means that charity retailers and
other second-hand retailers can continue to place second hand goods with CE
marking on the UK market, as before, for a time-limited period. There will be no need
to reassess or re-mark goods, thereby minimising costs to business and consumers.
As products that meet EU requirements can continue to be placed on the UK market
without any need for reassessment or re-marking, CE marked products will therefore
not be required to be re-marked with a UK Marking. This includes second hand
products.
We will consult with business, including charity retailers, before taking any decision to
end the period of recognition of the CE marking.
Toby Perkins: [222759]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if he will take
steps to ensure that charity shops will not be required to change Conformité Européene
labels to UK labels on existing stock on 29 March 2019 in the event that the UK leaves
the EU without a deal.
Kelly Tolhurst:
In the unlikely event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, the Government is
taking the decision to adopt a continuity approach to minimise disruption to
businesses and consumers. This means that goods that meet EU regulatory
requirements, including those with a CE Marking, will still be able to be placed on the
UK market for a time-limited period after 29 March 2019.
This rule applies to goods sold in charity shops, therefore charity shops will not need
relabel their products on 29 March 2019. As retailers of second hand goods, they will,
however, remain responsible for ensuring the products that they place on the market
are safe.
Toby Perkins: [222760]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether
secondhand goods with a CE label can continue to be sold by charity shops in the event
that the UK leaves the EU without a deal.
Kelly Tolhurst:
CE marking is a declaration that a product complied with relevant EU legislation when
the product was initially placed on the EU market. If a product has already been
placed on the market and is then later sold as second hand, it does not generally
have to be relabelled.
If the UK leaves without a deal, the Government has announced a time-limited
continuity approach to minimise disruption to businesses and consumers. This will
mean that CE marked goods – whether new or second hand – can continue to be
sold in the UK.
Charity shops will, therefore, still be able to sell second-hand goods labelled with the
CE Marking, as long as those goods were compliant at the time they were initially
placed on the UK market, and are still safe.
CABINET OFFICE
Cabinet Office: Consultants
Jon Trickett: [223139]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how much money has been spent from the
public purse on services provided by (a) Deloitte, (b) Slaughter and May and (c) Mott
MacDonald as recorded by his Department's spend analytic in each of the last five years.
Oliver Dowden:
Departmental spend over £25,000 is routinely published on Gov.UK.
Children: Paracetamol
Ruth George: [224372]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many children under the age of 16 have
had a (a) fatal and (b) non-fatal paracetamol overdose in each of the last 10 years.
Chloe Smith:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority.
I have asked the Authority to reply.
Attachments:
1. UKSA Response [PQ224372, 224373 holding response.pdf]
Ruth George: [224373]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many children under the age of 18 have
had a (a) fatal and (b) non-fatal paracetamol overdose in each of the last 10 years.
Chloe Smith:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority.
I have asked the Authority to reply.
Attachments:
1. UKSA Response [PQ224372, 224373 holding response.pdf]
Females: Pay
Kate Green: [223541]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what proportion of workers earning £30,000
per annum or less are women.
Chloe Smith:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority.
I have asked the Authority to reply.
Attachments:
1. UKSA Response [PQ 223541.pdf]
Government Departments: Procurement
Anneliese Dodds: [223207]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the guidance entitled,
Procurement policy note 03/14: promoting tax compliance, how many suppliers were
allocated contracts as a result of complying with (a) one and (b) more than one of the
mitigating circumstances after failing the tax compliance questions.
Oliver Dowden:
This information is not held centrally.
Prime Minister: Apprentices
Tracy Brabin: [223826]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what proportion of staff employed by in No. 10
Downing Street are apprentices.
Oliver Dowden:
The Cabinet Office currently employs 90 apprentices who are actively completing an
apprenticeship, this equates to 1.31% of our workforce.
As set out in the Civil Service apprenticeship strategy, the Civil Service has pledged
to achieve 30,000 apprenticeship starts in England by 2020, annually delivering 2.3%
of our workforce in England as apprenticeship starts.
Work is underway to produce detailed plans, at business unit level, to identify how
they will meet their target in 2019/20
DEFENCE
Ministry of Defence: Civil Partnerships and Marriage
Will Quince: [222595]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he is taking to allow (a) civil
marriage, (b) civil partnership and (c) same-sex marriage ceremonies on Ministry of
Defence sites.
Gavin Williamson:
I want to make sure that all those who want a civil marriage, civil partnerships and
same-sex marriage in the Armed Forces receive the same treatment as their
counterparts who wish to marry in religious ceremonies. That is why I have asked the
Department to look into all options on making this a reality and have written to the
Ministry of Justice and the Minister for Women and Equalities pushing this issue. The
relevant legislation should be changed so that all members of the Armed Forces
whether they want religious ceremonies, civil partnerships or marriage, or same-sex
marriage are treated equally.
The Department conducted a pilot project in 2016, under the Minister of the Armed
Forces, to consider the feasibility of using the MOD estate to host the registration of
civil marriages or partnerships. This pilot identified a change was required to the
relevant legislation to deliver this ambition. The current legislation does not allow for
the MOD sites to limit who is married, and who attends civil marriages, civil
partnerships and same-sex marriages; this presents difficulties in protecting security
of MOD sites. The Department is working on how we fix this anomaly and have
written asking for legislative change.
Meanwhile, more widely in the Armed Forces I am determined that the MOD should
continue to be a leader in supporting the LGBT community, and to build on the strong
progress to date. We continue to strive to be an employer of choice and are working
hard to improve the culture within defence to ensure that we attract and retain diverse
talent, including those from the LGBT community. Indeed, I was delighted the MOD
was recently recognised in the Stonewall Workplace Equality Index 2019, in which all
three services have been placed in the Top 100 LGBT inclusive employers listing.
In 2014, we made provision to allow the marriages of same sex couples in military
chapels, for those with demonstrable link to the Armed Forces and provided that the
chaplain and the chaplain's Sending Church agreed. At present only the United
Reformed Church (URC) permits its chaplains to conduct such marriages, and the
first religious marriage of a same sex couple on Defence site took place at St
Barbara's Church, HMS Excellent, Whale Island, Portsmouth in 2017.
Ministry of Defence: Procurement
Anneliese Dodds: [224371]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many suppliers have been excluded from
bidding for contracts due to their not meeting the criteria in his Department's Procurement
Policy Note 03/14 in each year since 2014.
Stuart Andrew:
The Cabinet Office's Procurement Policy Note 03/14 requires Central Government to
include measures to promote tax compliance in procurement over £5 million. The
Ministry of Defence (MOD) is compliant with this policy and includes tax compliance
conditions in its tenders and contracts.
Information on whether suppliers have been excluded from bidding for contracts is
not held centrally and, as the MOD has awarded nearly 4,000 contracts competitively
since 2014, this data can only be provided at disproportionate cost.
Nuclear Weapons: International Law
Martyn Day: [222573]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of
the implications for his policies of the conclusions of the New Zealand Yearbook of
International Law article entitled Is the UK nuclear deterrence policy lawful? Published in
Vol. 11, 2013; and if he will make a statement.
Gavin Williamson:
I can reassure the House that the United Kingdom's nuclear deterrent is fully
compliant and compatible with our international legal obligations.
Veterans
Toby Perkins: [223145]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent estimate he has made of the
number of veterans who have served in the armed forces who reside in each local
authority area.
Toby Perkins: [223146]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether it is his policy to record the number of
veterans who have served in the armed forces who reside in each local authority area.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
The Department does not record the number of veterans who reside in each local
authority.
An estimated distribution of the UK Armed Forces veteran population residing in
Great Britain can be found in the 'Annual Population Survey: UK Armed Forces
Veterans Residing in Great Britain', the latest edition of which (2017) is published at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/annual-population-survey-uk-armed-
forces-veterans-residing-in-great-britain. As at 2017, there were an estimated 2.4
million UK Armed Forces veterans residing in households across Great Britain.
The sample size of the Annual Population Survey is statistically too small to produce
veteran estimates at geographical locations below county level.
However, the Department does hold information on UK Armed Forces veterans in
each local authority who are in receipt of an Armed Forces occupational pension, a
disablement pension under the War Pensions Scheme or compensation under the
Armed Forces Compensation Scheme. This information can be found in table 3 of
“Location of Armed Forces pension and compensation recipients: as at 31 March
2018 (annex A)” which is published at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/location-of-armed-forces-pension-and-
compensation-recipients-2018.
Veterans: Identity Cards
Justin Madders: [223133]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reason there is an expiry date on the
HM Armed Forces Veterans identification card.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
In line with other identification cards such as passports and the Photo ID driving
licence, the Veterans ID card lasts for ten years. Appearances can change, and it is
important that Veteran ID cards provide a true likeness of the individual.
DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT
Football: Finance
Sir David Crausby: [222622]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what meetings he has
had with the Premier League in the last six months to discuss future funding for
grassroots football.
Mims Davies:
I met with the Premier League on 31 January 2019. The Secretary of State met with
them on 30 October 2018. The funding of grassroots football was discussed, and on
both occasions the Premier League reaffirmed their commitment to invest over
£100million in each of the next three years towards improving community football
programmes and facilities across the whole of the country in partnership with the
Football Association (FA) and Government.
Football: Schools
Sir David Crausby: [222626]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his
Department is taking to improve public access to school football facilities to increase
participation in grassroots football.
Mims Davies:
We want all schools to maximise the use of their facilities – for the mutual benefit of
schools and their communities. This is an ambition set out in the Government's
Sporting Future strategy and the Department for Education’s Governance Handbook
for schools.
Sport England’s 'Use Our School' resource has been designed to support schools to
open up their facilities for community use and to help those that are already open to
stay open.
The new cross-departmental School Sport and Physical Activity Action Plan, which
will be published in the spring, will also consider how school facilities can best be
used to encourage all children to play more sports, including football, and to be more
active.
Football: Sportsgrounds
Sir David Crausby: [222623]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his
Department is taking to improve access to all-weather football pitches at grassroots level.
Sir David Crausby: [222624]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether he has
received recent representations on the role of local authorities in the future of grassroots
football; and if he will make a statement.
Mims Davies:
Sport England invests £18million each year into football facilities on behalf of the
DCMS through ring-fenced exchequer contributions to the Football Foundation.
This funding, matched in partnership with the FA and the Premier League, sees more
money than ever before going towards priorities identified in the National Football
Facilities Strategy. The Strategy sets new challenging targets to significantly improve
the nation’s facilities stock over the next 10 years with an increase in 3G pitches is a
key strategic priority. This will be delivered through initiatives like the “Parklike Hubs”
programme that predominantly aims to deliver multi pitch 3G hubs for community use
at strategic locations across the country.
Local authorities are important stakeholders in the implementation of the National
Football Facilities Strategy as so much of the stock of facilities are in public
ownership. Sport England is working closely with the FA to develop Local Football
Facility Plans for every Local Authority in England. The plans will be in place by 2020
and will identify local priorities where investment in grassroots facilities is needed the
most.
EDUCATION
Carers: Children
Paul Farrelly: [224306]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps his Department is taking to
ensure that young carers are identified and adequately supported through their schooling.
Nadhim Zahawi:
The government is committed to supporting children and young people to improve
their health and wellbeing, and to protect them from excessive or inappropriate caring
responsibilities that can impact on their education.
The cross-government ‘Carers Action Plan’ (published June 2018), a 2 year
programme of tailored work to support unpaid carers of all ages, aims to improve the
identification of young carers; improving their educational opportunities and
outcomes; providing support to young carers, particularly to vulnerable children; and
improving access to services. The Children in Need review is also identifying how to
spread best practice on raising educational outcomes.
The Department for Education provides schools with £2.4 billion each year in
additional funding through the pupil premium to support disadvantaged pupils. Each
eligible pupil attracts £1,320 to primary schools and £935 to secondary schools.
Eligibility for the pupil premium is based largely on current or past claims for free
school meals. Some research with young carers aged 14-16 suggested that around
60% already attract the pupil premium through their eligibility for free school meals.
We expect schools to make effective use of their pupil premium and do not tell them
how to use it. Schools know their pupils best and will spend the grant to meet pupil
needs, which may include needs arising from a caring role. Schools are held to
account for their pupil premium use through school inspection and information in
performance tables, and most schools are required to publish details about their pupil
premium strategy and its impact.
Carers: Children and Young People
Angela Crawley: [222048]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent estimate his Department has
made of the number of carers under the age of 18 in (a) the UK, (b) England, (c)
Scotland, (d) Wales and (e) Northern Ireland.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: An estimate of the number of carers under the
age of 18 in England and Wales is collected by the Office of National Statistics
through census data. Information on the number of carers under 18 in Scotland and
Northern Ireland is a devolved matter.
According to the 2011 census, there are almost 166,000 young carers aged 5 to 17 in
England and Wales, although estimates from other studies using different
methodologies or question wording to identify carers are much higher.
In January 2017, the Department for Education published the omnibus survey report
‘The lives of young carers in England’:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-lives-of-young-carers-in-england.
This was a significant piece of research carried out by the Department in partnership
with Loughborough University looking to improve understanding of the numbers and
needs of young carers and their families.
The Department of Education and the Department of Health, Social Care have
commissioned the Carers Trust to undertake a review of best practice in identifying
young carers. This work is currently ongoing but by its conclusion should give us new
insights into how schools, health and other providers can best achieve this in
practice.
Child Trust Fund
Helen Goodman: [223788]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much funding he has allocated to the
Share Foundation's recovery programmes for Child Trust Fund accounts.
Nadhim Zahawi:
The Department for Education has provided the Share Foundation with funding
totalling £531,624 for administering the Junior Individual Savings Accounts scheme
for children in care and care leavers. It does not provide funding for recovery
programmes for Child Trust Funds.
Children: Day Care
Bridget Phillipson: [224323]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps his Department is taking to (a)
improve affordability and (b) reduce complexity for parents to access childcare support for
people in low-income families.
Nadhim Zahawi:
The government provides significant support to help families with childcare
affordability, including:
• 15 hours of free childcare a week for all 3 and 4-year-olds, worth around £2,500 a
year on average.
• 15 hours of free childcare a week for disadvantaged 2-year olds, i.e. all those
families in receipt of Universal Credit (UC), with an annual net earned income
equivalent to or less than £15,400; families in receipt of benefits that currently
qualify them for free school meals; those receiving working tax credits (with an
annual gross household income of no more than £16,190); and children entitled to
certain benefits or support for a disability or special educational need, looked-after
children and certain children who have been in care, including those who have
been adopted.
• 30 hours of free childcare a week, for working parents of 3 and 4-year-olds. 30
hours is available to families where both parents are working (or the sole parent is
working in a lone parent family), and each parent earns a weekly minimum
equivalent to 16 hours at national minimum wage or living wage. This also includes
self-employed parents.
• Childcare vouchers provided through some employers, allowing parents to save
money by paying for childcare from their pre-tax salary.
• Help with up to 70% of childcare costs for people on low incomes through working
tax credits, which in April 2016 increased to 85% through UC, subject to a monthly
limit of £646 for one child or £1108 for 2 or more children.
• Tax-free childcare, for which 1.5 million families who have childcare costs will be
eligible. For every £8 parents pay into an online account, the government will pay
£2 – up to a maximum contribution of £2,000 per child each year, for children aged
under 12. Parents of disabled children will receive extra support (worth up to
£4,000 per child, each year and until their child is 17).
To reduce complexity, the government has introduced a childcare calculator, which
parents can use to identify which of the childcare offers they may be entitled to. There
is also the childcare choices and GOV.UK websites, which provides detailed
information about all of the government’s childcare offers and how parents can apply.
Local authorities also have a statutory duty to provide parents with information,
advice and guidance on their websites about how these childcare offers can be
accessed locally.
European University Institute
Angela Rayner: [224487]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, for what reason he has withdrawn the
European University Institute (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
Angela Rayner: [224488]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will make it his policy to seek UK
membership of the European University Institute Convention after the UK leaves the EU.
Chris Skidmore:
The UK’s EU membership is inextricably linked to its current membership of the
European University Institute Convention (EUIC). As a result of EU Exit, the UK will
no longer be an EU member state and so, in a ‘no deal’ scenario, the UK’s
membership of the EUIC will automatically cease on 29 March 2019. In a 'deal'
scenario, the UK’s membership of this convention will continue for the duration of the
implementation period.
The Political Declaration sets out that we will establish general principles, terms and
conditions for UK participation in EU programmes in areas of shared interest, and
wider dialogues to allow us to share best practice and act together in our mutual
interest. On this basis, we will explore with the European University Institute (EUI)
options for future participation in its activities and we will work to ensure that UK
students at the EUI will be able to complete their studies.
The EUI (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, submitted on 7 February, were withdrawn
because of a minor terminology error in the accompanying Explanatory Memorandum
(the exact name of the instrument). They were resubmitted in corrected form on 19
February.
Graduates: Employment
David Simpson: [223116]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps his Department is taking with the
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to help university graduates
secure graduate job roles.
Chris Skidmore:
Employment outcomes for graduates are strong and, due to demand from employers,
healthy increases have been seen in recent years. In 2016/17, over 90% of UK and
other EU domiciled leavers were in work or further study 6 months after graduating
and, of those employed, 79% were employed in highly-skilled and professional
occupations. This compares to 89% and 73%, respectively in 2012/13.
The government’s Industrial Strategy sets out a long-term plan to boost productivity
by backing businesses to create good jobs and increase the earning power of people
throughout the UK with investment in skills, industries and infrastructure. £120 million
was provided to fund collaboration between businesses and universities to stimulate
local innovation through the Strength in Places Fund.
The Graduate Talent Pool is a government initiative which is designed to help new
and recent graduates gain real work experience. This allows employers to advertise
paid internships to new and recent graduates, free of charge.
The higher education regulator, the Office for Students’ (OfS), primary aim is to
ensure that higher education delivers positive outcomes for students and it has a
regulatory focus to ensure that students are able to progress into employment or
further study. The OfS supports graduate employment outcomes in a number of
ways, including a Challenge Competition to boost local employment outcomes and
the Institute of Coding which aims to boost UK digital skills and graduate outcomes.
The government has been improving the information available to students to help
them make informed choices when making decisions on higher education providers
and subject choice. For example, Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes
Frameworks, Longitudinal Education Outcomes data and the Higher Education Open
Data Competition we are running, which all provide information to prospective
students.
Pre-school Education: Finance
Bridget Phillipson: [222628]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate his Department has made of
the number of maintained nursery schools that would close if they received no further
funding guarantee for the period after 2020.
Bridget Phillipson: [222633]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether his Department has made an
assessment of the effect on social mobility of the closure of maintained nursery schools.
Nadhim Zahawi:
Maintained nursery schools (MNS) make a valuable contribution to improving the
lives of some of our most disadvantaged children.
MNS experience costs over and above those of other early years providers. That is
why we are providing local authorities with around £60 million a year in
supplementary funding to enable them to protect MNS funding.
This arrangement is due to end in March 2020, and what happens after that will be
determined by the next Spending Review. We are aware that the supplementary
funding for MNS currently accounts for about a third of their budgets - owing to
uncertainty over the exact date of the Spending Review, we are considering how best
to handle transitional arrangements for a number of areas, including MNS.
This government has an ambition to halve the proportion of children who finish
reception year without the early communication and reading skills they need to thrive.
To support this we are investing over £100 million in our social mobility programme.
This includes £20 million in high quality, evidence-based training and professional
development for pre-reception early years staff in disadvantaged areas; £26 million in
a network of English hubs; and £10 million to understand ‘what works’ in partnership
with the Education Endowment Foundation.
This ambitious work is underpinned by our early education entitlements - where we
are making record investment. This includes the entitlement to up to 15 hours of free
early education for disadvantaged 2-year-olds. Since its introduction in 2013, over
700,000 2-year-olds have benefited and take-up has risen and is now 72%.
Pre-school Education: Free School Meals
Stephen Timms: [223250]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment he has made of the
potential merits of increasing the payment to providers for universal free infant school
meals above the current rate of £2.30 per meal which has applied since 2014.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: The £2.30 per meal rate that we provide to
schools to fund universal infant free school meals was set at the last Spending
Review in 2015. The rate is based on the School Food Trust’s survey estimate of the
average cost of a primary school meal, and on discussion with stakeholders and
school food experts.
Decisions about school funding beyond 2020 will be taken at the next Spending
Review in 2019.
Stephen Timms: [223481]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans he has to assess the effect of the
universal free infant school meals policy on (a) school standards and (b) pupils' wellbeing
since its introduction in 2014.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: We spend around £600 million every year
ensuring 1.5 million infants in reception, year 1 and year 2 receive a free, nutritious
meal at lunchtime. This ensures pupils are well nourished, develop healthy eating
habits and can concentrate and learn.
We know that a balanced and nutritious meal, which includes vegetables and fruit, is
good for the health and well-being of children. By showing that more children are
eating a school meal we are confident that our universal infant free school meal
(UIFSM) policy is having a positive impact on children. We expect UIFSMs to bring
longer term benefits for children’s health by instilling early in life healthy eating habits
which will be carried forward into later years.
Shared mealtimes are great for learning to talk, behave, take turns, be polite and
share. Schools trialling free school meals in advance of the policy being introduced
reported better behaviour and a nicer atmosphere as a result of pupils eating together
every day.
Since 2010 we’ve been reforming education and driving up school standards. 1.9
million more children are now being taught in good and outstanding schools than
were in 2010, thanks in part to our reforms.
Pupils: Disadvantaged
Seema Malhotra: [224337]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to tackle the disparity
in attainment between white British pupils of key stage 4 age who (a) are and (b) are not
eligible for free school meals.
Nick Gibb:
The Government is committed to creating a truly meritocratic country, where
everyone has a fair chance to go as far as their hard work will take them, regardless
of background. To raise standards for all pupils, the Department has already
reformed the secondary curriculum, assessment and accountability arrangements.
The Department’s GCSE reforms mean that there is a rigorous suite of new
qualifications, in line with the standards expected in countries with high performing
education systems. The Department has also introduced new progress measures so
that schools are accountable for the progress pupils make as well as their attainment.
The Department is aware that the most significant factor affecting pupil attainment,
across all ethnicities including white British children, is economic disadvantage. To
tackle this, the Department has provided a total of £13.75 billion from April 2011 to
March 2018 through the pupil premium to help schools improve the progress and
attainment of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Department continues to
provide this additional funding, which is £2.4 billion this year alone. Pupils recorded
as eligible for free school meals now, or at any point in the last 6 years, are eligible
for the pupil premium.
Pupils: Hearing Impairment
Paul Farrelly: [223936]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to ensure the
adequacy of support for deaf schoolchildren in mainstream schools.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: I am determined that all children and young
people, including those who are deaf or have a hearing impairment, receive the
support they need to achieve the success they deserve.
94% of pupils identified with hearing impairment as their primary type of need in
January 2018 were in a state-funded mainstream school. It is therefore important that
teachers in mainstream schools, as well as those in specialist settings, are equipped
with the knowledge and skill to support their individual pupils, including those with a
hearing impairment, to achieve their potential.
In April 2018 the Whole School special educational needs and disabilities (SEND)
consortium, led by nasen, were awarded £3.4 million for 2018-2020 to deliver a
programme of work to equip the school workforce to deliver high quality teaching
across all types of SEND, including hearing impairment. The programme of work
aims to help schools identify and meet SEND training needs and build the specialist
workforce. We are also reviewing the learning outcomes of specialist SEND
qualifications, including the mandatory qualifications for teachers of classes with
hearing impairment, to ensure they reflect the changing needs of the education
system.
Schools: Social Workers
Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck: [223985]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what risk assessments his Department has
made on proposals to place social workers in schools in the local authority areas of (a)
Southampton, (b) Stockport and (c) Lambeth.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: Southampton, Stockport and Lambeth have
received funding from the What Works Centre for Children’s Social Care to test
having social workers in schools. As part of the application process the local
authorities were required to provide the What Works Centre with information about
key risks to delivery and the contingencies they would undertake to mitigate them.
The local authorities provided their assessment as part of the application and these
continue to be reviewed through project monitoring.
Small Businesses: Apprentices
Sir John Hayes: [222813]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps his Department has taken to
support small businesses in taking on apprentices.
Anne Milton:
Apprenticeships offer businesses of all sizes an opportunity to make a sustainable
investment in the training they need to grow and prosper.
For businesses with fewer than 50 employees who take on apprentices aged 16-18
(or up to the age of 24 for care leavers), the government meets the full cost of
training. All organisations who do not pay the apprenticeship levy benefit from very
generous funding from government, which will rise to 95% of the cost of training and
assessment in 2019.
The new apprenticeships marketing campaign, Fire it Up, aims to increase the
number of apprenticeship vacancies offered by employers, and incorporates a
website featuring case studies from small businesses and information on the funding
support available. It will continue to support employers to create new vacancies and
publicise these on the ‘Find an Apprenticeship’ website.
Small businesses are also able to benefit from transfers of apprenticeship levy funds,
which enable levy-paying employers to use up to 10% of their annual levy funds (up
to 25% from April 2019) to support apprenticeship starts in their supply chain or to
meet local skills shortages.
Soft Drinks: Taxation
Helen Hayes: [223505]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will ensure that under the
comprehensive spending review at least the same level of revenue from the Soft Drinks
Industry Levy is allocated to (a) the continuation of the healthy pupils capital fund and (b)
other schemes for the improvement of children’s health.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: Budget 2016 announced funding for a number
of programmes linked to the revenue from the Soft Drinks Industry Levy. The
department will receive £575 million during the current Spending Review period.
Funding for 2020-21 onwards will be considered at the next Spending Review.
£100 million of revenue generated from the Soft Drinks Industry Levy is being used
for the Healthy Pupils Capital Fund. This one-year fund for 2018-19 is intended to
improve children’s and young people’s physical and mental health by enhancing
access to facilities for physical activity, healthy eating, mental health and wellbeing
and medical conditions. These facilities include kitchens, dining facilities, changing
rooms, playgrounds and sports facilities. There are no plans for the Healthy Pupils
Capital Fund to continue beyond 2018-19.
Special Educational Needs: Staff
Stephen Morgan: [224492]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps his Department is taking to
ensure the recruitment of adequate numbers of Special Educational Needs Coordinators.
Nadhim Zahawi:
Every mainstream school and academy must have a Special Educational Needs Co-
ordinator (SENCO) who is a qualified teacher. The recruitment of SENCOs is the
responsibility of individual schools.
On 28 January 2019, we published the Teacher Recruitment and Retention Strategy
and launched the Early Career Framework, which provides the starting point for a
review of Initial Teacher Training content.
In addition, the Whole Schools’ SEND consortium, led by nasen, are delivering a 2
year programme of work. The aim is to embed special educational need and disability
within the school led system of school improvement in order to equip the workforce to
deliver high quality teaching across all types of special educational needs (SEN). Part
of that work is to undertake a review of the learning outcomes of the mandatory
Masters level National Award in SEN Coordination to ensure that the qualification
reflects the changing needs of the educational system. A report is due in the spring.
T-levels: Science
Stephen Metcalfe: [222732]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether students will be able to progress
from a science T-level to a laboratory technician apprenticeship incorporating a level 4
qualification.
Anne Milton:
With additional teaching hours and a meaningful industry placement, we are
confident that T levels will give students the knowledge and skills needed to get a
skilled job, either immediately or after higher technical education (for example an
appropriate level 4 apprenticeship where it is offered by an employer). The outline
content for the Science T level has been developed by a panel of employers and
other experts (including GlaxoSmithKline and the Royal Society of Chemistry), who
have defined the skills needed to give students the best chance of progressing to a
relevant job or higher level study, including a laboratory technician apprenticeship.
T levels in Science, Healthcare Science and Health will roll out from September 2021.
We recently launched the expression of interest process for providers wishing to
deliver T levels in 2021.
T-levels: Work Experience
Stephen Metcalfe: [222731]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to ensure the supply
of T-level industry placements in the science sector.
Anne Milton:
It is important that employers from all industries are supported to deliver industry
placements. We believe employers will benefit from offering industry placements, but
recognise that this is a big change given the scale needed. We have already worked
with a number of employers, including those from the science sector, to identify the
main barriers and challenges to delivering industry placements. We also learnt more
about these and the type of support that employers need from the industry
placements pilot evaluation. As a result, we have invested £5 million into the National
Apprenticeship Service to raise awareness and promote industry placements through
their employer networks. This will include creating a streamlined ‘matchmaking’
service putting employers in touch with providers in their area.
We are also considering what additional support employers require on a route by
route basis to effectively plan and implement industry placements. Equally, we
recognise that different placement models might be needed to accommodate different
industries, students and locations. We have been carrying out extensive stakeholder
engagement across different challenging industries, including employers from the
science sector, to ensure industry placement policy generates placements that are
meaningful, reflective of current industry practice and meet the needs of employers.
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Cat Smith: [223144]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, which Minister is responsible for children's
play services; and what steps the Government is taking on ensuring that the UK upholds
Article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child on the right to play.
Nadhim Zahawi:
[Holding answer 25 February 2019]: I am the Minister responsible for early years and
childcare policy.
The UK government remains fully committed to children’s rights and the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child, and I reaffirmed our commitment in my Written
Ministerial Statement on 20 November 2018.
The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) Statutory Framework sets the regulatory
standards for ‘learning and development’ and ‘safeguarding and welfare’
requirements for all early years providers caring for children from birth to 5. The
framework defines 7 areas of learning and development and is clear that each area
must be implemented through planned, purposeful play and through a mix of adult-
led and child-initiated activity.
The EYFS Statutory Framework is available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework-
-2.
Universities: Degrees
David Simpson: [223115]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent discussions he has had with
representatives of universities on the proposed introduction of two year degree courses.
Chris Skidmore:
My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State meets with representatives of universities
regularly to discuss the Department for Education agenda. I have discussed 2 year
degree courses, in the context of discussions about accelerated degree courses, with
representatives of several universities -including most recently Middlesex University
and St Mary’s University Twickenham, both of whom are publicly funded providers of
accelerated degrees.
Young People: Unemployment
Justin Madders: [222656]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many people aged 16-19 were not in
employment, education or training in (a) Ellesmere Port and Neston constituency, (b)
Cheshire West and Chester unitary authority and (c) the North West of England in each
of the last five years for which figures are available.
Anne Milton:
Figures for the number of people aged 16-19 not in employment, education or
training (NEET) are not available at unitary authority or constituency level.
The Department for Education’s definitive estimates for young people aged 16-18
NEET in England are published in the National Statistics release ‘Participation in
education, training and employment’. This can be found here
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-neet. These estimates cannot be
disaggregated to lower level geographies.
The Department for Education also publishes estimates for England and the English
regions based on quarterly Labour Force Survey (LFS) data. However, due to sample
size limitations in the LFS data, it is not possible to produce reliable estimates at
unitary authority or constituency level.
Local authority level NEET estimates for England are published annually as
transparency data from the department’s National Client Caseload Information
System (NCCIS). For young people aged 16-17, local authorities are required to
monitor the extent to which they are meeting their duty to participate in education or
training through the NCCIS and figures for 2016/17 and 2017/18 are provided in the
table attached. Prior to 2016/17, young people aged 18 were also tracked by local
authorities and figures for 2013/14 to 2015/16 are also provided in the table attached.
It should also be noted that there is a break in the time series as figures prior to
2016/17 had an adjustment applied to the NEET figures to include those whose
activity was not known who were likely to be NEET. Post 2016/17 this adjustment
was no longer applied and the NEET figures include all people whose activity was not
known (in order to incentivise local authorities to better track their young people); as a
result, these figures should be interpreted with caution.
Estimates for academic year 2017/18 are published here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/neet-and-participation-local-authority-
figures.
Data prior to 2018 can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/neet-data-by-local-authority-2012-16-to-
18-year-olds-not-in-education-employment-or-training.
Also available are national statistics showing the destinations of pupils after key stage
4 (i.e. year 11, usually aged 16) and key stage 5 (after A levels or other level 3
qualifications, usually aged 18). See
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/destinations-of-ks4-and-ks5-pupils-2017.
This release shows the proportion of students staying in education or going into
employment or an apprenticeship for at least 2 terms. It also shows the percentage of
students who do not sustain their activity and can be used as an approximation for
numbers NEET. Time series data by local authority and parliamentary constituency
covering destination years 2010/11 to 2016/17 is available as part of the additional
and underlying data from the statistics page.
Attachments:
1. 222656_NCCIS_Estimates_of_NEET_for_Cheshire
[222656_NCCIS_Estimates_of_NEET_for_Cheshire_and_North_West.pdf]
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS
Agriculture: Children
Sir John Hayes: [222776]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent steps
he has taken to promote jobs in (a) agriculture and (b) horticulture to children.
George Eustice:
It is a key priority of this government to enable an innovative, productive and
competitive agricultural and horticultural sector.
Attracting young talent into agricultural and horticultural careers and having a skilled
workforce in place is vital for the future of UK food and farming.
The Government is working with industry bodies, such as the Food and Drink Sector
Council, to raise awareness of agriculture as an exciting and attractive career path
and to improve access to the talent and skills required by the industry.
The Government is reforming post-16 technical education to provide clear routes to
skilled employment in agriculture and other sectors. A key part of this is the
introduction of new T levels programmes, which alongside apprenticeships, will sit
within 15 routes, including an Agriculture, Environmental and Animal Care route.
Agriculture: Subsidies
Kerry McCarthy: [223210]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is
taking to ensure the (a) maintenance and (b) transparency of information in relation to
farm payments after the UK leaves the EU; whether his Department's CAP Payments
Search website will be used to hold that information; and whether it will link recipients of
payments to company and directorship registers kept by Companies House.
George Eustice:
It is right that the public are informed of how and where public funds are spent. We
intend that information currently made available through our CAP Payments Search
pages will continue to be published after the UK leaves the EU. This will apply in
relation to payments made in England under the legacy CAP schemes, using
retained CAP legislation, until the planned end of our agricultural transition period in
2027, or until the legacy schemes have ended, if earlier.
Clause 2 of the Agriculture Bill contains powers to enable information to be published
in relation to the new system of payments that will replace CAP schemes. This
includes information on who receives payments and for what purpose. The exact
nature of that information will be determined during the design process and in close
discussion with stakeholders and across government. We will need to ensure a
balance between transparency of public expenditure and commercial sensitivities.
Dairy Farming
Sir John Hayes: [222814]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he has
taken to support dairy farmers to obtain a fair price from supermarkets for their produce.
George Eustice:
We want all farmers to get a fair price for their products and the Government is
committed to tackling the unfairness that exists in the dairy supply chain.
There are a number of possible options for achieving this, including using new
powers in our Agriculture Bill to introduce Statutory Codes of Practice, and using
existing powers on Mandatory Written Contracts.
The approach taken will need to take account of the outcome of EU negotiations, and
a wide range of stakeholder views. We will launch a full consultation in due course.
Equine Flu: Disease Control
Sir John Hayes: [222810]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he has
taken to minimise the spread of the equine flu.
David Rutley:
The Government has been monitoring the situation and maintaining close contact
with the Animal Health Trust (AHT) and British Horseracing Authority (BHA) as well
as the Equine Disease Coalition.
Equine flu is a contagious disease of horses, donkeys, mules and all equidae. Clinical
signs include a raised temperature, cough and nasal discharge, lethargy and loss of
appetite. In otherwise healthy horses cases typically resolve within 1-2 weeks. It is
not a public health risk. Vaccination is the main control measure, alongside isolation
of infected cases and minimising the mixing of horses during an outbreak. Equine flu
is not a notifiable disease in the UK, which means that the industry takes
responsibility for surveillance, testing and vaccination. The Horserace Betting Levy
Board, which is a Government arm’s length body, provides funds to the AHT, which is
an internationally approved reference laboratory for equine flu.
Horse owners are urged to contact their private vet if they suspect respiratory illness
and to practice good biosecurity and isolate suspected or confirmed cases.
Non-native Species: EU Law
Kerry McCarthy: [222682]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what management
measures his Department has in place to meet the UK’s obligations under Article 19 of
EU Regulation No 1143/2014 on invasive alien species.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
Article 19 of the EU Invasive Alien Species Regulation (“The EU Regulation”)
requires EU Member States to put in place effective management measures for listed
species that are widely spread so that their impact on biodiversity, ecosystem
services, human health and the economy are minimised. These measures must be
aimed at the eradication, population control or containment of the population of a
species.
Around 15 of the listed species are widespread in England and Wales, including grey
squirrel, muntjac deer and floating pennywort, and management measures are
already in place for some of these. For example, work by the Forestry Commission
and UK Squirrel Accord partners under the Grey Squirrel Action Plan, and the
removal by the Environment Agency of more than 1,000 tonnes of pennywort from
the River Ouse in 2018.
We will be consulting on measures for widespread species.
Kerry McCarthy: [223215]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which competent
authority or authorities are responsible for ensuring compliance with the restrictions under
Article 7 of EU Regulation No 1143/2014 on invasive alien species.
Kerry McCarthy: [223216]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will publish a
list of incidents recorded of non-compliance under under Article 7 of EU Regulation No
1143/2014 on invasive alien species.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The enforcement bodies for Article 7 will include UK Border Force, the Police, Natural
England and Natural Resources Wales.
The Government has no plans to publish a list of recorded non-compliance prior to
Order coming into force. Where breaches of the EU Regulation have been reported,
the Government has taken the appropriate action including liaising with online sales
platforms to facilitate the removal of online listings that contravened the restrictions
laid out in the EU Regulation.
Pets: Travel
Patrick Grady: [224490]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans his
Department has to publish further guidance on pet travel to Europe after the UK leaves
the EU.
David Rutley:
Whatever the outcome of negotiations, when the UK leaves the EU, owners of pet
dogs, cats and ferrets will be able to continue to travel to the EU with their pets but
there may be changes to the system.
We want owners to continue to be able to travel with their animals with the minimum
of disruption, whilst maintaining our high biosecurity and welfare standards. However,
it’s our duty as a responsible Government to prepare for all eventualities, including a
‘no deal’ scenario.
On 6 November 2018, Defra published guidance on Pet Travel to Europe after Brexit
in preparation for the possibility of leaving the EU without a deal. The guidance also
contains advice on the documents and health preparation required for pets to return
to the UK from the EU.
The Department will continue to keep this guidance up to date as the arrangements
that allow pet owners to travel to and from the EU with pets after the UK leaves the
EU are confirmed.
Rural Payments Agency: Geospatial Commission
Kerry McCarthy: [223213]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether the Rural
Payments Agency is participating in the work of the Geospatial Commission; and whether
there are plans to publish the Rural Land Register as part of the work of that
Commission.
George Eustice:
The Rural Payments Agency (RPA) has made initial contact with the Geospatial
Commission (GC) and is looking to have a productive working relationship.
Outside of the work of the GC, Defra’s data sharing platform and data.gov already
allow private sector organisations and the public access to many of Defra’s
geospatial open datasets. The RPA is working alongside the Ordnance Survey, the
Environment Agency, Digital Data and Technology Services and the agri-tech sector
to develop the IT, control and licence protocols to enable more of the RPA’s land data
to be more openly accessible using the data sharing platform.
Salmon: Scotland
Jim Shannon: [223058]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what discussions
officials in his Department have had with their counterparts in the Scottish Government
on trends in mortality rates for farmed salmon.
George Eustice:
The Government is aware of concerns about trends in mortality rates for Scottish
farmed salmon. Aquaculture is a devolved matter. The issue is therefore a matter for
the Scottish Government, which we understand is taking action, including through the
Farmed Fish Health Framework. Officials are in regular discussions with Scottish
Government counterparts on a wide range of issues related to fishing and
aquaculture.
Tyres: Recycling
Chris Ruane: [223248]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what due
diligence his Department undertakes relating to used tire exports to India for recycling
purposes.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The UK and India are both parties to the Basel Convention which provides the
system for controlling movements of hazardous and other wastes between countries.
It is fully implemented in UK law through Regulation (EC) 1013/2006 on the shipment
of waste and the UK Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007. Under
Regulation (EC) 1013/2006, most exports of non hazardous wastes destined for
recycling to non-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
countries are subject to light touch international export controls known as ‘green-list’
controls. The European Commission asks non-OECD countries, including India, to
indicate where more stringent controls are required. India has indicated that exports
of tyres from the UK can be exported under green-list controls and must also meet
the requirements of Indian regulations.
The UK environmental regulators take an intelligence led approach to checking
compliance with waste export regulations. They carry out proactive and intelligence
led inspections to stop waste shipments that breach these regulations before they
leave our ports. Where concerns are raised about a recycling facility in other
countries, further information is requested from the relevant authorities in that country
to confirm sites are permitted and regulated according to their national laws.
In our recently published Resources and Waste Strategy, we set out plans to
introduce Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for more waste streams, including
tyres. This will increase the responsibility on tyre producers regarding their end of life.
We are also further developing a range of measures including: increased monitoring
of international waste shipments, improved provision for waste repatriation, and
charging higher fees to improve compliance. These changes aim to ensure any waste
we do send abroad is fit for recycling, and that it is recycled to equivalent standards
as required in the UK. This should create a more level playing field for domestic
recyclers as well as reducing the chances of exported tyres being mishandled.
EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION
Department for Exiting the European Union: Procurement
Anneliese Dodds: [224370]
To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, how many suppliers have
been excluded from bidding for contracts as a result of not complying with the criteria set
out in the guidance entitled, Procurement policy note 03/14: promoting tax compliance, in
each year since the creation of his Department.
Chris Heaton-Harris:
The Department have not directly excluded any suppliers from bidding for contracts
on the basis of PPN 03/14.
FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE
[Subject Heading to be Assigned]
Chris Williamson: [224321]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what
representations he has made to his Turkish counterpart on ending the isolation of
Abdullah Ocalan in line with International and Turkish domestic law and bring an end to
hunger strikes in that country.
Sir Alan Duncan:
British Embassy officials discussed the imprisonment of Abdullah Öcalan with Turkish
officials in mid-January. They also covered the hunger strikes in support of Abdullah
Öcalan by Kurdish prisoners, including Leyla Guven MP. We are pleased to note that
she was recently released from prison. We expect the Turkish authorities to ensure
that prisoners' human rights are observed, including access to medical treatment.
Central European University
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [222610]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
discussions he has had with (a) the Hungarian Government and (b) his counterparts in
the EU on the future of the Central European University in Budapest.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The Foreign Secretary has not discussed this matter with his Hungarian or EU
counterparts. However, both the former Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, and our
Embassy in Budapest have discussed it with the Hungarian Government. If and when
we have concerns, we raise them privately with our Hungarian counterparts, as you
do with friends and allies.
Elections
Mr Virendra Sharma: [909456]
What recent steps his Department has taken to support free and fair elections
internationally.
Mark Field:
We support elections by providing financial and technical assistance to international
organisations that carry out election observations missions; in particular the
European Union, the Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe, and the
Commonwealth. In 2018, the UK contributed observers to Organization for Security
Cooperation in Europe missions in Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia,
Montenegro, Macedonia (now North Macedonia) and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Procurement
Anneliese Dodds: [224369]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many
suppliers have been excluded from bidding for contracts as a result of not complying with
the criteria set out in the guidance entitled, Procurement policy note 03/14: promoting tax
compliance, in each year since 2014.
Sir Alan Duncan:
Authority to enter into contracts is devolved to directorates and departments within
the FCO in London as well as the global network of overseas missions. Relevant data
to answer this question is not held centrally and could not be collated without
disproportionate cost.
Human Rights
Ann Clwyd: [223809]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, when his
Department plans to publish its guidelines for supporting human rights defenders.
Mark Field:
The Minister of State for the Commonwealth and the UN is committed to making UK
support for human rights defenders more transparent. Officials are working in
consultation with NGOs to publish a document setting out UK support for human
rights defenders in 2019.
India: Pakistan
Sir John Hayes: [222811]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assessment
he has made of the implications for his Department's policies of the recent escalation of
tensions between India and Pakistan.
Mark Field:
We condemn in the strongest terms last week's appalling terror attack in Pulwama.
The thoughts of the British Government are with the victims and their families. We are
engaging the Governments of both India and Pakistan to encourage them to find
diplomatic solutions and refrain from actions that could jeopardise regional stability.
We are also working with the international community and through the UN Security
Council to ensure that the perpetrators of the Pulwama attack are brought to justice.
Iran: Press TV
Anne-Marie Trevelyan: [219522]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what estimate his
Department has made of the (a) budget of Press TV and (b) level of investment it
receives from the Iranian State; and what assessment he has made of Press TV's level of
editorial independence.
Alistair Burt:
We assess that Press TV is part of state-controlled Iranian media, and as such it is
not independent. We cannot currently assess Press TV’s budget or the level of
investment it receives from the Iranian state. Press TV’s license to broadcast in the
UK was revoked by Ofcom in 2012.
Iraq: Politics and Government
Eddie Hughes: [909450]
What recent diplomatic steps his Department has taken to support peace and stability in
Iraq.
Alistair Burt:
I visited Iraq last month and held useful discussions with leaders from the
Government of Iraq and Kurdistan Regional Governemnt. We discussed how the UK
and Iraq could cooperate together to promote peace and stability in Iraq. I announced
a further £30 million in funding to help rebuild Iraq and reinvigorate the economy.
Kashmir: Terrorism
Bob Blackman: [909449]
What diplomatic steps he has taken to support India following the recent terrorist attack in
Jammu and Kashmir.
Mark Field:
The UK government unequivocally condemns the appalling terror attacks in Pulwama
on 14 Februrary. We are actively encouraging the Governments of both India and
Pakistan to find diplomatic solutions and refrain from actions that could jeopardise
regional stability. We are also working through the UN Security Council to ensure that
the perpetrators are brought to justice.
Press Freedom
Dr Matthew Offord: [909455]
What steps he is taking to protect the rights and freedoms of journalists throughout the
world.
Mark Field:
A free media is the life blood of democracy. This is why the Foreign Secretray has put
the resources of the FCO behind a global media freedom campaign. The Foreign
Secretary was delighted to announce that he and his Canadian counterpart, the
Honorable Chrystia Freeland, will co-host a major international conference in London
on 10-11 July. My noble friend Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon has extended our invitation
to the world's Foreign Ministers at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.
Sierra Leone: Politics and Government
Nigel Dodds: [223503]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent
discussions he has had with his counterpart in Sierra Leone on the national emergency
declared in that country.
Harriett Baldwin:
The Government is aware that the President of Sierra Leone has declared a national
emergency on the prevalence of sexual and gender-based violence. The high rates
are alarming: 56 per cent of women in Sierra Leone report experiencing physical
violence. This month, the Sierra Leone-based Rainbo Initiative reported 2800 sexual
assaults committed against girls and women since the start of 2018.
The British Government regularly raises concerns about sexual and gender-based
violence with the Government of Sierra Leone. The High Commissioner to Sierra
Leone met the First Lady of Sierra Leone, a prominent campaigner, on 12 February
2019 to discuss the issue. We welcome President Bio's recent steps to establish a
new police department that solely investigates sexual offenses involving children and
a special court focusing on such cases.
Sudan: Economic Situation
Jim Shannon: [223056]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what discussions
his Department has had with the North Sudanese Government on economic support for
that country.
Harriett Baldwin:
The UK continue to urge the Government of Sudan to deliver much needed economic
reforms for the benefit of all Sudanese citizens, and to continue to make
improvements to the humanitarian and development operating environment. Most
recently, officials from the Department of International Development discussed
development work in Sudan, specifically the Darfur Development Strategy refresh,
with senior officials in the Government of Sudan on 21 February.
Three Seas Initiative
Daniel Kawczynski: [222708]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what support his
Department plans to provide to the Three Seas Initiative.
Daniel Kawczynski: [222709]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether he plans to
hold discussions with the Three Seas Initiative to explore future avenues for mutual
cooperation.
Daniel Kawczynski: [222710]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether his
Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of the UK becoming an
observer to the Three Seas Initiative.
Daniel Kawczynski: [222711]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will make it his
policy to support enhancing the diversity of energy supply in Europe through the Three
Seas Initiative.
Daniel Kawczynski: [222712]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will make an
assessment of the potential of the Three Seas Initiative to enhance regional cooperation
and development.
Sir Alan Duncan:
We support initiatives to strengthen and diversify the European energy market and
welcome the efforts of the participants in the Three Seas Initiative to promote
cooperation and development across the region. We have strong relationships with
the participating countries and will continue to discuss opportunities for mutual
cooperation with them, particularly on issues of such strategic importance, including
through the Three Seas Initiative.
Venezuela: Money Laundering
Andrew Lewer: [222579]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether the
Government is taking steps to identify (a) individuals and (b) institutions in the UK which
have (i) facilitated and (ii) benefited from the movement of stolen and laundered
Venezuelan funds through the UK; and which partners the Government is working with to
(A) identify and (B) freeze all monies and assets in the UK that are Maduro regime
pending transfer of those monies to the control of the government of interim President
Juan Guaido.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The EU agreed targeted sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes, against
18 individuals with senior positions in the Maduro regime. The UK is discussing with
EU partners the possibility of increasing the number of individuals subject to
sanctions.
In addition, the Government is currently considering what further bilateral measures
might be implemented to increase pressure on the Maduro regime.
Venezuela: Presidents
Andrew Bridgen: [909448]
What recent discussions he has had with his international counterparts on the status of
the presidency in Venezuela.
Sir Alan Duncan:
On 24 January, the Foreign Secretary discussed Venezuela with Vice-President
Pence and Secretary of State Pompeo in Washington, and further discussed
Venezuela at a meeting of EU Foreign Ministers in Bucharest on 30 January.
On 26 January, I represented the UK at the UN Security Council where I discussed
Venezuela with European and regional counterparts. On 4 Feburary, I went to Ottawa
for the meeting of Lima Group countries, where I discussed Venezuela with regional
and Foreign Ministers.
Andrew Lewer: [909460]
What recent discussions he has had with his international counterparts on the status of
the presidency in Venezuela.
Sir Alan Duncan:
On 24 January, the Foreign Secretary discussed Venezuela with Vice-President
Pence and Secretary of State Pompeo in Washington, and further discussed
Venezuela at a meeting of EU Foreign Ministers in Bucharest on 30 January.
On 26 January, I represented the UK at the UN Security Council where I discussed
Venezuela with European and regional counterparts. On 4 Feburary, I went to Ottawa
for the meeting of Lima Group countries, where I discussed Venezuela with regional
Foreign Ministers.
Yemen: Conflict Resolution
Louise Haigh: [909457]
What recent diplomatic steps he has taken to help pursue a resolution to the conflict in
Yemen.
Alistair Burt:
The situation in Yemen is of great concern to the government and the UK remains at
the forefront of the diplomatic response. Most recently, the Foreign Secretary co-
hosted the Yemen Ministeral Quad with US Secretary of State Pompeo on 13
Februrary in Warsaw. At this meeting, we highlighted our continued commitment to
progress on Yemen, which is at a critical juncture.
Yemen: Security
Kevin Brennan: [909451]
What recent assessment he has made of the security situation in Yemen.
Alistair Burt:
The situation in Yemen is of great concern to the government and the UK remains at
the forefront of the diplomatic response. Most recently, the Foreign Secretary co-
hosted the Yemen Ministeral Quad with US Secretary of the State Pompeo on 13
February in Warsaw. At this meeting, we highlighted our continued commitment to
progress on Yemen, which is at a critical juncture.
HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
Abortion
Sir Edward Leigh: [223137]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 6
February 2019 to Question 217544 on Spina Bifida: Surgery, if his Department will make
it its policy to provide pain relief to unborn babies of a similar age undergoing a
termination.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The Department does not set clinical practice. To support clinical practice, the Royal
College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has considered the issue of fetal pain
and awareness in its guidelines ‘The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion’
and ‘Fetal Awareness: Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice’,
which are available at the following links:
https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/abortion-
guideline_web_1.pdf
https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/rcogfetalawarenesswpr0
610.pdf
Accident and Emergency Departments: Standards
Paul Farrelly: [222748]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made
of the potential effect on patient care of removing A&E waiting time targets.
Stephen Hammond:
The Prime Minister announced a clinically-led review of standards in June 2018. The
review is considering the appropriateness of operational standards for physical and
mental health relating to planned, unplanned urgent or emergency care, as well as
cancer. The Review is being led by NHS England’s National Medical Director,
Professor Stephen Powis. In the interest of patient safety, we are committed to
ensuring that any changes to waiting time standards are based on clinical evidence.
Any changes should, and will, only seek to further strengthen current operational
standards.
The Review will report its interim findings in the spring of 2019, after which any
recommended changes will be carefully field-tested across the National Health
Service, before they are implemented.
Ambulance Services: East Midlands
Sir John Hayes: [222815]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimate he has made of
the average response time of ambulances in the East Midlands by (a) constituency and
(b) county, in the latest period for which data is available.
Stephen Hammond:
Information is not available in the format requested. National and individual
ambulance National Health Service trust level performance is available and published
monthly by NHS England and can be found at the following link:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/ambulance-quality-
indicators/
Ambulance Services: Standards
Sir John Hayes: [222816]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made
of trends in the level of ambulance response times in each year since 1997.
Stephen Hammond:
National Health Service ambulance trusts transitioned to new standards in December
2017, following a rigorous and independent evaluation of the clinically-led Ambulance
Response Programme (ARP). As a result, data is not comparable pre- and post the
ARP. National and individual ambulance NHS trust level performance data is
published monthly by NHS England, and can be found at the following link:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/ambulance-quality-
indicators/
Asthma: Prescriptions
Sir David Amess: [224470]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will take steps to include
asthma in the list of conditions which are exempt from the payment of prescription
charges.
Sir David Amess: [224471]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if his Department will make an
assessment of the effect on people's health of prescription charges for asthma medicines.
Steve Brine:
Extensive arrangements are already in place to help people afford National Health
Service prescriptions. These include a broad range of prescription charge
exemptions, for which someone with asthma may qualify. The Department has no
current plans to amend these exemptions, including the list of medical conditions that
provides exemption from prescription charges.
People on a low income, who do not qualify for an exemption, may be eligible for full
or partial help with prescription charges through application to the NHS Low Income
Scheme.
To support those with greatest need who do not qualify for an exemption or the NHS
Low Income Scheme, prescription prepayment certificates are available. A holder of a
12-month certificate can get all the prescriptions they need for just £2 per week.
Cancer: Health Professions
Thangam Debbonaire: [223778]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to
ensure that the Health Education England phase two cancer workforce plan co-ordinates
with the workforce implementation plan in the NHS Long Term Plan.
Steve Brine:
Health Education England (HEE) published its first ever Cancer Workforce Plan in
December 2017. HEE intended to publish a second phase, longer-term strategy that
looked at the cancer workforce needs beyond 2021. This work was started and
stakeholders from within the National Health Service and the charitable sector
contributed to the early discussions. This work has since been superseded by
publication of the NHS Long Term Plan in January 2019.
My Rt. hon. Friend Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has subsequently
commissioned Baroness Dido Harding, working closely with Sir David Behan, to lead
a number of programmes to engage with key NHS interests to develop a detailed
workforce implementation plan. These programmes will consider detailed proposals
to grow the workforce rapidly, including staff working on cancer, consider additional
staff and skills required, build a supportive working culture in the NHS and ensure
first rate leadership for NHS staff.
Cervical Cancer: Screening
Paul Farrelly: [224307]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether it remains his policy
that the NHS is the primary provider for cervical cytology screening in England.
Steve Brine:
The National Health Service will remain the primary provider for cervical cytology
screening in England and cervical screening remains part of the General Medical
Services contract.
In November 2015, the UK National Screening Committee recommended that human
papillomavirus (HPV) screening should replace the currently used liquid based
cytology test as the primary screening for cervical disease.
Following a review of its delivery strategy, NHS England commenced a one-stage
procurement process to reconfigure provider laboratories to support the roll-out of
HPV primary screening into the NHS Cervical Cancer Screening Programme in
England. HPV primary screening is due to be rolled out in 2019.
Once full implementation is achieved, all samples will be tested for HPV which
causes more than 99% of cervical cancers. This could prevent around 600 cancers a
year.
Continuing Care
Julian Knight: [223076]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether a qualified witness
independent of the relevant clinical commissioning group is required to be involved in a
patient's continuing healthcare assessment.
Caroline Dinenage:
The National Framework for Continuing Healthcare requires that a multidisciplinary
team (MDT) must assess whether an individual has a primary health need. This MDT
must comprise at least two professionals who are from different healthcare
professions, or one professional who is from a healthcare profession and one person
who is responsible for assessing persons who may have needs for care and support
under part 1 of the Care Act 2014.
The MDT should usually include both health and social care professionals and, as far
as is reasonably practicable, the clinical commissioning group (CCG) must consult
with the relevant local authority before making any decision about an individual’s
eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare. A local authority must, when requested to
do so by a CCG, co-operate with the CCG in arranging for persons to participate in a
MDT. In addition to this, the individual and, where appropriate, their representative
should be enabled to play a central role in the assessment process.
Continuing Care: Finance
Julian Knight: [222651]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the timescale is for Care
Commissioning Groups to request information from relevant (a) medical and (b) care
organisations during a continuing healthcare appeal.
Julian Knight: [222652]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the length of time required
is for a Care Commissioning Group to respond to a continuing healthcare appeal.
Julian Knight: [222654]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what length of time is set for a
(a) medical and (b) care organisation to respond to a request for information by a Care
Commissioning Group in relation to a continuing healthcare appeal.
Caroline Dinenage:
The National Framework for Continuing Healthcare and NHS Funded Nursing Care
(October 2018) requires that all clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) have a local
resolution process for responding to requests for reviews of Continuing Healthcare
eligibility decisions.
The National Framework specifies that local resolution processes should initially
involve an informal two-way meeting between the CCG and the individual or their
representative. Where a formal meeting is required, this could result in the CCG
requesting further information from other organisations.
Under the National Framework, CCGs are responsible for developing, delivering and
publishing a resolution process which includes timescales.
The National Framework specifies that CCGs should deal with requests for review of
eligibility decisions in a timely manner.
NHS England is responsible for holding CCGs to account if they are not following the
National Framework.
Julian Knight: [222653]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the length of time required
is for a (a) medical and (b) care organisation to respond to a request for information by a
Care Commissioning Group in relation to a continuing healthcare application.
Julian Knight: [222655]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether there is a minimum
period of notice given to families of those being given a continuing healthcare
assessment to ensure they have adequate time to attend the assessment.
Caroline Dinenage:
The National Framework for Continuing Healthcare and NHS Funded Nursing Care
October 2018, states that after a clinical commissioning group (CCG) receives a
positive checklist they should in most cases make the eligibility decision within 28
calendar days. CCGs are responsible for setting their own time periods for each
‘stage’ of the process including notice periods to families and timeline expectations
from third parties regarding requests for information.
Dental Services: Cumbria
Tim Farron: [222742]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many new adult patients
have been registered by each NHS dental practice in South Lakeland in each of the last
20 years.
Tim Farron: [222743]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he plans to take to
increase the number of new adult patients registered by NHS dental practices in
Cumbria.
Steve Brine:
The data is not held centrally in the format requested.
NHS England is responsible on behalf of Secretary of State for Health and Social
Care commissioning dental services to meet local need and assessing the level of
that need. NHS England advises that it is aware of and taking action to address
identified shortfalls in dental provision particularly, but not exclusively, in South
Cumbria. Action taken already in South Cumbria has included offering practices
additional funding to take on additional patients.
Eating Disorders: Health Services
Caroline Lucas: [222801]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 23
October 2018 to Question 179179 on Eating Disorders, and with reference to
recommendation two on page five of the report entitled, Ignoring the alarms: How NHS
eating disorder services are failing patients, published by the Parliamentary and Health
Service Ombudsman on 6 December 2017, what plans he has to achieve parity between
adult eating disorder services and child and adolescent services; what funding has been
allocated to achieve that parity; and if he will make a statement.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The Government takes seriously the report of the Parliamentary and Health Services
Ombudsman (PHSO) ‘Ignoring the alarms: how NHS eating disorder services are
failing patients’, including the recommendation to achieve parity between adult eating
disorders services and children and young people services.
NHS England is now working to understand the geographical variation of current
services, and the cost and workforce required to achieve parity with children and
young people’s eating disorder services.
NHS England has set up a working group, chaired by Professor Tim Kendall, the
NHS England and NHS Improvement National Clinical Director for Mental Health, to
address the PHSO’s recommendations and take them into account in planning for
improvements to eating disorder services.
The NHS Long Term Plan, published on 7 January 2019, sets out NHS England’s
proposals to improve care for adults include maintaining and developing new services
for those who have the most complex needs. The recently published ‘NHS
Operational Planning and Contracting Guidance 2019/20 Annex B: Guidance for
operational and activity plans - assurance statements’ to accompany the NHS
Planning Guidance for 2019/20 makes clear that these services include services for
adults with eating disorders.
Epilepsy: Drugs
Dr Rosena Allin-Khan: [222701]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 31
January 2019 to Question 211841, what specific steps his Department has taken to
ensure the supply of epilepsy medication in the event of the UK leaving the EU without a
deal.
Stephen Hammond:
We understand that epilepsy medicines are vitally important to many people in this
country. Our contingency plans aim to ensure that the supply of epilepsy medicines
and other essential medicines to patients is not disrupted in all European Union exit
scenarios, including in the event of a ‘no deal’ exit.
In August 2018, the Department wrote to all pharmaceutical companies that supply
prescription-only and pharmacy medicines to the United Kingdom that come from, or
via, the EU/European Economic Area asking them to ensure a minimum of six weeks’
additional supply in the UK, over and above existing business-as-usual buffer stocks,
by 29 March 2019.
On 7 December, the Government published updated reasonable worst-case scenario
border disruption planning assumptions in the event of a ‘no deal’ EU exit. Medicines
and medical products are prioritised in cross-Government planning, and the
Department is working with relevant partners across Government and industry to
ensure we have sufficient roll-on, roll-off freight capacity on alternative routes to
enable these vital products to continue to move freely into the UK.
Throughout the implementation of our plans, we have received very good
engagement from industry who share our aims of ensuring that the supply of
medicines and medical products can continue unhindered in the event of a ‘no deal’
EU exit.
Exercise
Jim Shannon: [223054]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent steps the NHS has
taken to promote the health benefits of regular exercise.
Steve Brine:
The Government recognises the health benefits of regular exercise. The Chief
Medical Officer has commissioned an evidence based review of physical activity and
health which will be published later this year. The ‘One You’ Campaign developed by
Public Health England and the National Health Service provides information around a
range of topics and provides the tools to encourage people to make better choices
today that can have a huge influence on their health, and could prevent diseases
such as type 2 diabetes, cancer and heart disease, and reduce the risk of suffering a
stroke or living with dementia, disability and frailty in later life.
Fibromyalgia
Angela Crawley: [222673]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to meet with
fibromyalgia charities and organisations.
Steve Brine:
Ministers at the Department regularly meet with charities and organisations to discuss
many issues. However there are no current plans to meet with fibromyalgia charities
and organisations.
General Practitioners: Overseas Companies
Julian Sturdy: [223127]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what proportion of GP practices
are administered by healthcare companies based abroad.
Julian Sturdy: [223130]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimate he has made of
the number of GP consortia that are run for profit by overseas-based medical insurance
firms.
Steve Brine:
This information is not collected or held centrally.
Health Services: British Nationals Abroad
Tom Brake: [222802]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent discussions he has
had with relevant health charities on ensuring they have advance warning of the
publication of new advice on travel in the EU and EEA in the event that the UK leaves the
EU without a deal.
Tom Brake: [222804]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken to
ensure the safety of patients with pre-existing conditions, which are not covered by
insurance, who travel in the EU and would no longer be covered by reciprocal healthcare
agreements in the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal.
Tom Brake: [222807]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to
ensure that reciprocal agreements with EU Member States and Members of the EEA for
the provision of health care to UK citizens travelling temporarily to those countries will be
in place after the UK leaves the EU; and what the timetable is for those arrangements.
Stephen Hammond:
The United Kingdom Government is seeking agreements with Member States, so that
no individual will face sudden changes to their healthcare cover.
People requiring treatment for their pre-existing conditions when travelling should
always seek advice from their doctor and specialist unit before booking travel. They
should also contact the chosen specialist administrator at the destination of travel to
ensure their treatment is covered after 29 March 2019 in a ‘no deal’ scenario. Any
charges to the patient should be discussed and agreed before booking travel.
The Department has been in discussion with a number of stakeholders on reciprocal
healthcare after the UK leaves the EU.
Any new travel advice will be updated on GOV.UK and the NHS website as the
circumstances change, including for travellers who have pre-existing conditions.
Health Services: Greater London
Sir John Hayes: [222818]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how much and what proportion
of total NHS funding is spent in the Greater London area in each of the last five years.
Stephen Hammond:
Spending in Greater London and as a percentage of the total NHS England Mandate
is shown in the following table. The spending may include services for people not
living in London.
FINANCIAL YEAR
TOTAL SPENDING FOR GREATER
LONDON (£ MILLION)
GREATER LONDON SPEND AS A
% OF TOTAL NHS ENGLAND
MANDATE
2017-18 18,600 17%
2016-17 17,800 17%
2015-16 17,300 17%
FINANCIAL YEAR
TOTAL SPENDING FOR GREATER
LONDON (£ MILLION)
GREATER LONDON SPEND AS A
% OF TOTAL NHS ENGLAND
MANDATE
2014-15 16,700 17%
2013-14 16,200 17%
Notes:
1. The spend includes all areas of direct commissioning and clinical commissioning
groups (CCGs), and also relevant administration and programme budgets.
2. Commissioning categories included: CCG direct commissioning; health and justice;
NHS England central programme costs; NHS England running costs; other; primary
care and secondary dental; public health; social care; and, specialised
commissioning.
3. The spend figures for CCGs are presented on an International Financial Reporting
Standards basis, compared against the total resource departmental expenditure
limit mandate for NHS England.
4. The spend figures may exclude some transformation budgets that are deployed
nationally.
5. The spend figures for specialised include all specialised spend with London
providers, which will include spend on patients from outside of London.
Health Services: Reciprocal Arrangements
Kevin Brennan: [224302]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many times European
Health Insurance Cards were used by UK citizens abroad in the past year.
Kevin Brennan: [224304]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many European Health
Insurance Cards have been issued to people over the age of 70.
Kevin Brennan: [224305]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many times European
Health Insurance Cards were used by UK citizens abroad to support the treatment of pre-
existing conditions in the last year.
Stephen Hammond:
There were 118,684 accepted claims when a European Health Insurance Card
(EHIC) was used, in the last 12 months.
There are 3,108,739 United Kingdom-issued EHICs in circulation for people aged
over 70. This is based on cards which have not expired and the applicant’s age on
the date the card was issued, and not their current age. EHICs are valid for five years
after their issue date.
Information is not available on the number of times EHICs were used by UK citizens
abroad to support the treatment of pre-existing conditions in the last year.
Kevin Brennan: [224303]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many times European
Health Insurance Cards were used by people over the age of 70 in each of the last five
years.
Stephen Hammond:
The following table shows the number of European Health Insurance Card claims
from people aged over 70 by year for the last five years:
2014 29,632
2015 35,518
2016 43,121
2017 38,271
2018 23,172
Heart Diseases: Transplant Surgery
Jim Shannon: [223052]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many people have had an
operation for an artificial heart have been undertaken in the NHS.
Steve Brine:
The information is not available in the format requested.
HIV Infection: Drugs
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [222647]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what discussions he has had
with (a) NHS England, (b) Public Health England and (c) local authorities on achieving
the Government's commitment to double the number of places on the PrEP Impact Trials.
Steve Brine:
On 30 January, my Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
announced that the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Impact trial would be expanded
to 26,000 people. Work is underway with partners to take this forward. The PrEP
Oversight Board has requested information on local capacity to make the additional
places available, and will review this later in February.
Hospitals: Cash Dispensing
Frank Field: [223542]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he issued guidance to
NHS hospitals on the phasing out of pay-to-use cash machines.
Stephen Hammond:
Decisions on the provision of Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) at hospitals are
made by National Health Service trusts locally. Guidance has not been issued on
ATMs, but there is more general guidance on income generation can be found at the
following link:
https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130124072327/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/pro
d_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_413066
8.pdf
Local decisions need to include an assessment of the need for supporting patients
and visitors to access cash. The use of electronic payments is increasingly common
in NHS hospitals. As with other areas of income generation, in the event that a
surplus is made by the trusts after costs are offset, this is used to improve clinical
services.
Hospitals: Waiting Lists
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [222611]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make it his policy to
consult patients before changes are made to NHS waiting times targets.
Stephen Hammond:
The clinically-led review of standards was announced by the Prime Minister in June
2018. The review is considering the appropriateness of operational standards for
physical and mental health relating to planned, unplanned urgent or emergency care,
as well as cancer. In the interest of patient safety, we are committed to ensuring that
any changes to waiting time standards are based on clinical evidence.
The Long Term Plan provides a platform upon which innovative models of patient
care can and are being developed. In that context, the NHS National Medical Director
has been working with the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, Healthwatch England
and many others to consider what matters most to patients, on the clinical issues with
the current target regime, and what National Health Service staff believe will help
them provide the best quality care for patients.
The review will report its interim findings in the spring of 2019, after which any
recommended changes arising from the Clinical Standards Review will be carefully
tested across the NHS and be subject to a rigorous approach before they are
implemented. Any changes should, and will, only seek to further strengthen current
operational standards. Any changes to the NHS Constitution will be consulted on as
is legally required.
Integrated Care Systems: Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Stephen Morgan: [222660]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the evidential basis was
for his Department's decision to create an Integrated Care System covering Hampshire
and the Isle of Wight.
Stephen Morgan: [222661]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made
of the potential negative consequences of introducing Integrated Care Systems on
subsidiarity and tailored approaches to local needs.
Stephen Hammond:
NHS England’s Five Year Forward View set out a clear vision on how to close the
gaps of the health and wellbeing of the population, the quality of care provided, and
the finances and efficiencies of NHS services. The NHS’s chosen vehicle to deliver
this is sustainability and transformation partnerships (STPs) which bring together
National Health Service organisations and local councils together in footprints
covering the whole of England.
The areas to be covered by all STPs, including Hampshire and Isle of Wight, were
decided through discussions between the leaders of local and national NHS bodies.
Factors that were considered included partnership work already under way between
organisations, local government boundaries, and where patients go to receive
treatment.
The NHS Long Term Plan confirmed that all STPs will become Integrated Care
Systems (ICSs) by April 2021.
ICSs will be expected to work in partnership with local authorities, to make collective
decisions on population health, service redesign and the implementation of the Long
Term Plan. The Plan set out a further requirement that ICSs establish a partnership
board, drawn from and representing commissioners, trusts, primary care networks,
local authorities, the voluntary and community sector and other local partners. This
will be accompanied by a new ICS accountability and performance framework that
will consolidate the current combination of local accountability arrangements that
exists, and provide a consistent and comparable set of performance measures which
could be used to assess ICSs.
Mental Illness: Community Care
Steve McCabe: [222619]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether powers exist to compel
an individual to accept mental health treatment in the community.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
An individual cannot be compelled to have treatment in the community if they do not
want it.
For individuals who have been detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, section
17A of the Act makes provision for Community Treatment Orders. This allows
conditions to be placed on an individual when in the community, following detention
under s3 or s37 of the Mental Health Act. If conditions are not followed, and an
individual’s mental health declines, they can be recalled back to hospital for
treatment.
NHS: DHL
Caroline Lucas: [224317]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the proposed
shipping route to be operated by DHL for products supplied to the NHS on a 24 to 72
hours timeframe in the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, what assurances
he has sought from DHL that the issues which led to the supply-chain breakdown in 2018
that occurred during DHL's contract with Kentucky Fried Chicken have been resolved;
and if he will make a statement.
Stephen Hammond:
The contractual arrangement that the Department has with DHL is unrelated to any
other contracts that they may operate for different clients.
The Department has a team working closely with DHL on all aspects of the
operational mobilisation and assuring that this contingency will be in place ahead of
the date that the United Kingdom exits the European Union.
NHS: Drugs
Emma Dent Coad: [223824]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 8
February 2019 to Question 215257, on NHS: drugs, what information his Department
holds on the level of medicine shortages in the last 12 months.
Steve Brine:
Medicines shortages are a routine issue that the Department constantly manages.
The Department works closely with the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the pharmaceutical industry, NHS England and others
operating in the supply chain to ensure that the risks to patients are minimised when
they do arise.
The Department receives regular reports from the pharmaceutical industry about
impending medicine supply issues that may affect United Kingdom patients. From
January 2019, it became a mandatory requirement that the pharmaceutical industry
must report this information to us in a timely manner. However, not all the issues of
which the Department are notified will result in a medicine shortage as the supply
team will work behind the scenes using a host of tools to help mitigate and prevent an
issue from impacting patients.
Tom Brake: [224290]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what guidance his Department
has issued to Clinical Commissioning Groups on the provision of medicines in the event
that the UK leaves the EU without a deal; and what the responsibility is of Clinical
Commissioning Groups ensure adequate supplies of medicines in that event.
Stephen Hammond:
The Department’s contingency plans aim to ensure that the supply of medicines to
patients is not disrupted in all European Union exit scenarios, including in the event
we exit the EU without a deal. We are confident that, if everyone does what they
need to do, the supply of medicines will be uninterrupted in the event of exiting the
EU without a deal.
The Department is working closely with trade bodies, product suppliers, the health
and care system in England, the devolved administrations and Crown Dependencies,
to make detailed plans to ensure the continuation of the supply of medicines to the
whole of the United Kingdom in the event of a no deal EU exit.
On 23 August 2018, the Department sent a letter to all healthcare providers to advise
of our ‘no deal’ EU exit medicines supply contingency plans. That letter highlighted
the need for maintaining existing practices and that hospitals, general practitioners
and community pharmacies throughout the UK do not need to take any steps to
stockpile additional medicines, beyond their business as usual buffer stocks.
A letter from Dr Keith Ridge CBE, the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer at NHS England,
outlining the steps taken thus far to protect the continuity of supply for medicines was
then sent out NHS services, including clinical commissioning groups, on 17 January
2019.
More recently, on 4 February 2019, a further letter was sent out by Professor Keith
Willett, EU Exit Strategic Commander and Medical Director for Acute Care and
Emergency Preparedness, to clinical commissioning groups and trust Chief
Executives reiterating the Department’s messaging and outlining the operational
response that NHS England and NHS Improvement are undertaking at a national and
regional level in preparation for a ‘no deal’ EU exit. This latest letter also includes
links to previous correspondence and operational guidance.
NHS: Fees and Charges
Frank Field: [222612]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make an assessment
of the potential merits of extending entitlement to discounted (a) prescriptions, (b) eye
tests and (c) dental treatment to (i) apprentices earning the apprentice rate of the
minimum wage and (ii) all other apprentices.
Steve Brine:
The Department has extensive arrangements in place to help people access
prescriptions, eye sight tests and dental treatment. This includes a broad range of
National Health Service charge exemptions for certain medical conditions and related
to age or entitlement to certain social security benefits. The Department has no
current plans to amend these exemptions.
Apprentices on a low income, who do not qualify for an exemption, may be eligible for
full or partial help with prescription charges, dental treatment charges and the cost of
sight tests, glasses and contact lenses through application to the NHS Low Income
Scheme.
On prescription charges, to support those with greatest need who do not qualify for
an exemption or the low-income scheme, prescription prepayment certificates are
available. A holder of a 12-month certificate can get all the prescriptions they need for
just £2 per week.
NHS: Negligence
Ian Austin: [224312]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when he plans to publish the
cross-Government strategy on the costs of clinical negligence.
Steve Brine:
The rising costs of clinical negligence are a major concern. As set out by the National
Audit Office in their September 2017 report ‘Managing the Costs of Clinical
Negligence in Hospital Trusts’, between 2006-07 and 2016-17, annual cash costs for
clinical negligence quadrupled from £0.4 billion to £1.6 billion. In the same period the
number of claims registered with NHS Resolution doubled from 5,300 to 10,600.
Funds spent on clinical negligence claims are resources that are not available for
patient care and this rate of rise is unsustainable.
We are committed to tackling this issue and we are working intensively across
Government, looking at all the drivers of cost. We will bring forward proposals in due
course.
Non-ionizing Radiation
Toby Perkins: [222608]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an
assessment of the implications for his policies of the Committee on Medical Aspects of
Radiation in the Environment report on the health effects of UV radiation; and whether he
plans to implement the recommendations in that report.
Steve Brine:
In 2009 the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment
(COMARE) provided advice on the health effects from ultraviolet (UV) radiation in
their 13th report. This related to the effects form sunbed use because of the evidence
accumulating about the particular associations with artificial tanning devices. The
committee has not produced any additional advice or recommendations on the
general risks of UV exposure since their statement in 1992 about the general impacts
of UV exposure. As a result, the Sunbeds Regulation Act 2010 was implemented to
prohibit under-18s from using sunbeds. Local authorities are responsible for enforcing
the regulations and carry out inspections. The Department and the Health and Safety
Executive have published guidance to support the enforcement and safe use of
sunbeds, and Public Health England (PHE) continues to monitor the evidence on the
impacts of the use of sunbeds.
PHE discourages the use of sunbeds for cosmetic tanning and provides information
to increase awareness of the health risks of excessive exposure to UV radiation and
advice for people to protect themselves. Further information can be found at the
following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ultraviolet-radiation-and-sunscreen
An awareness campaign on the signs of skin cancer has also been carried out by
PHE and NHS England.
PHE provides independent and expert advices on a range of topics, including UV
radiation and staying safe in the sun. Further information can be found at the
following links:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/spring-sun-advice-from-public-health-england
Pain: Medical Treatments
Martin Vickers: [223082]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the NHS Long
Term Plan, what assessment he has made of the effect of developments in digital care on
the provision of pain pathway services.
Martin Vickers: [223083]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to prevent worsening chronicity of pain in people suffering from chronic pain.
Steve Brine:
The routine assessment and management of pain is a required competency of all
healthcare professionals. Many patients with chronic pain can be successfully
supported and managed through routine primary and secondary care pain
management services. Approaches to treatment are not all pharmacological;
education in self-management techniques to aid symptom control may also be
appropriate for some patients.
As set out in the NHS Long Term Plan, published on 7 January 2019, low back and
neck pain is the greatest cause of years lost to disability, with chronic joint pain or
osteoarthritis affecting over 8.75 million people in the United Kingdom. In the Long
Term Plan NHS England committed to build on work already undertaken to ensure
patients will have direct access to musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners (FCP).
98% of sustainability and transformation partnerships have confirmed pilot sites for
FCP and 55% of pilots are already underway.
NHS England will expand the number of physiotherapists working in primary care
networks, enabling people to see the right professional first time, without needing a
general practitioner referral. NHS England will also expand access to support such as
the online version of ESCAPE-pain, Enabling Self-management and Coping with
Arthritic Pain through Exercise, a digital version of the well-established, face-to-face
group programme.
Postnatal Depression
Steve McCabe: [222574]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make an assessment
of the implications for his policies of the conclusions of the June 2017 National Childbirth
Trust report entitled The Hidden Half: Bringing postnatal mental illness on a lack of
support for new mothers with mental health issues.
Jackie Doyle-Price:
The Department is aware of the National Childbirth Trust’s ‘Hidden Half’ report and
campaign, which are making an important contribution to the debate around the need
to develop and improve perinatal mental health services.
The NHS Long Term Plan includes a commitment for a further 24,000 women to be
able to access specialist perinatal mental health care by 2023/24, building on the
additional 30,000 women who will access these services each year by 2020/21 under
pre-existing plans as set out in the Five Year Forward View for Mental Health.
Specialist care will also be available from preconception to 24 months after birth,
which will provide an extra year of support.
General practitioners and primary care teams have a crucial role in supporting the
identification of perinatal mental illness and treatment, and are part of an integrated
pathway of services. This includes monitoring early onset conditions, providing pre-
conception counselling and referring women to specialist mental health services,
including Improving Access to Psychological Therapies and specialist perinatal
community teams, if necessary.
Over £1.2 million was provided in 2017 to enable the training of primary care,
maternity and mental health staff to increase awareness and skills related to perinatal
mental health.
Rare Diseases: Drugs
John Lamont: [223060]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make an assessment
of the potential merits of implementing a UK-wide scheme for the purchase and
distribution of expensive drugs and medical supplies that are used to treat rare
conditions.
Steve Brine:
We have no plans to assess the potential merits of implementing a United Kingdom-
wide scheme for the purchase and distribution of expensive drugs and medical
supplies that are used to treat rare conditions. It is for the National Health Service in
England and the devolved administrations to make decisions in the best interest of
their patients, including those with rare diseases, to ensure access to the medicines
and medical supplies they need.
St James Hospital Portsmouth
Stephen Morgan: [222577]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the value was of the bid
submitted by Portsmouth City Council for the St. James Hospital site in Milton,
Portsmouth.
Stephen Hammond:
NHS Property Services treats all bids as commercial in confidence.
HOME OFFICE
British Nationality: EU Nationals
Deidre Brock: [222649]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether he will make it his policy
to offer UK citizenship to EU citizens free of charge on the same basis as the EU
Settlement Scheme.
Caroline Nokes:
As the Prime Minister announced on 21 January, there will be no fee for applications
under the EU Settlement Scheme when we roll out the scheme in full by 30 March.
Anyone who has applied during the pilot phase, or who does so, will have their fee
reimbursed. The Home Office will set out further details in due course.
We have no plans to reduce or abolish the fee for British citizenship applications for
EU citizens.
Cannabis: Medical Treatments
Norman Lamb: [222736]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many specialist doctors are
licenced to prescribe medicinal cannabis.
Mr Nick Hurd:
None. From 1 November 2018, specialist doctors on the Specialist Register of the
General Medical Council have been able to prescribe cannabis-based products for
medicinal use without the need for a Home Office li-cence.
Deportation: West Africa
Caroline Lucas: [194670]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 9
October 2018 to Question 174681 on deportation: West Africa, what the outcome was of
the considerations taking place in relation to the two people who were referred under the
National Referral Mechanism for the identification of victims of trafficking; and what type
of status was granted to the individual who was a family member of an EEA national.
Caroline Nokes:
There are conclusive grounds to accept that the two people referred under the
National Referral Mechanism for the identification of victims of trafficking, are both
victims of modern day slavery.
One individual has been granted a period of discretionary leave. There are no
reasons to believe that the other individual requires protection and/or assistance and
therefore a grant of Discretionary Leave has not been made. The individual was
issued a residence card as a non-EEA national family member confirming their right
to reside in accordance with EEA Treaty rights.
Diamorphine: Glasgow
Mr Paul Sweeney: [193514]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 19
November 2018 to Question 191442 on Diamorphine: Glasgow, what the guidelines are
on chronic heroin addiction treatment plans as a condition of his Department permitting a
diamorphine prescribing licence to local authorities.
Victoria Atkins:
The issue of ‘prescriber’ licences was devolved to the Scottish Ministers in 2012. The
timeline for a decision on any prescriber licence or any conditions to be assigned to
that licence are matters for Scottish Government.
Any controlled drugs licenses required by the organisation at a specific premises to
possess and supply controlled drugs are a matter for the Home Office.
Domestic Abuse
Conor McGinn: [223818]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what framework social services
use when dealing with (a) adolescent-to-parent violence and abuse and (b) child-on-
parent violence.
Victoria Atkins:
The Government is committed to tackling all forms of domestic abuse. On 21 January
2019, we published a landmark draft Domestic Abuse Bill alongside a wide-ranging
package of measures to protect and support victims.
As part of our package of commitments, we will drive forward wide-ranging reforms to
children’s social care, to ensure that social workers provide effective support to
children and families affected by domestic abuse. We are also providing funding for
the development of training for social workers on domestic abuse.
In 2015 the Government published an information guide on adolescent to parent
violence and abuse, which provides materials and advice to support professionals in
their response, including social workers.
Early Intervention Youth Fund
Dr Matthew Offord: [199932]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made
of the effectiveness of the Early Intervention Youth Fund; and what accomplishments that
fund has achieved.
Victoria Atkins:
Our Early Intervention Youth Fund of £22 million is already supporting 29 projects in
England and Wales. Over £17 million has already been allocated to projects
delivering interventions to young people at risk of criminal involvement, gang
exploitation and county lines.
The successful bids were announced in November 2018 and so it is too early to
make an assessment of the Fund’s effectiveness and any accomplishments.
We will be appointing an independent evaluation partner who will support local
partnerships with monitoring arrangements and will gather qualitative and quantitative
data over the course of the project. This work will contribute to a programme wide
evaluation, including an overview of what we have learnt about good practice. The
projects will also be required to provide regular updates on their progress.
Vicky Foxcroft: [216377]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans he has to
assessment the effectiveness of the allocation of funds from the Early Intervention Fund.
Victoria Atkins:
Our Early Intervention Youth Fund of £22 million is already supporting 29 projects in
England and Wales. Over £17 million has already been allocated to projects
delivering interventions to young people at risk of criminal involvement, gang
exploitation and county lines.
We will shortly be appointing an independent evaluation partner who will support
projects with their monitoring arrangements and will gather qualitative and
quantitative data. This work will contribute to a programme wide evaluation, including
an overview of what we have learnt about good practice. The projects will also be
required to provide regular updates on their progress as part of their grant
agreements.
English Language: Assessments
Stephen Timms: [224291]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he plans to complete his
review of the treatment of people accused by ETS of cheating in English language tests.
Caroline Nokes:
I refer to my previous answer to question 163106.
In relation to reviewing live ongoing litigation we continue to work closely with
applicants and the Courts to progress each individual case.
Where people have made a Human Rights claim this will be considered and even if
refused will generate an in country right of appeal (unless the claim is clearly
unfounded).
Fire and Rescue Services: Labour Mobility
Sir David Crausby: [222620]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate he has made of
the number of redeployment opportunities for firefighters who have to work until the age
of 60.
Mr Nick Hurd:
We do not collect data on redeployment opportunities for firefighters.
The availability of redeployment opportunities is a matter for individual fire and rescue
authorities as employers.
Fire and Rescue Services: Staff
Jenny Chapman: [909399]
What assessment he has made of the effect of changes in the number of firefighters on
fire service capacity to respond to emergency calls.
Mr Nick Hurd:
Recent data show that the average total response time to primary fires has remained
the same as last year, and for secondary fires has increased by 1 second since last
year.
Total response times have risen gradually since 1994 but are now starting to
stabilise.
Fire and rescue services have the resources they need to do their important work.
Fraud: Prosecutions
Graham P Jones: [196884]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made
of the effectiveness of the Serious Crime Act 2015 on prosecuting perpetrators of
financial abuse.
Victoria Atkins:
The Serious Crime Act 2015 introduced a new domestic abuse offence of coercive or
controlling behaviour in intimate and familial relationships. The statutory guidance
underpinning the offence is clear that financial abuse, such as controlling the victim’s
finances, is a type of behaviour that can form part of a purposeful pattern of
behaviour over time to exert power, control or coercion over another person.
In 2017-18 960 offences of coercive or controlling behaviour have been charged and
reached a first hearing, more than three times the volume in the previous year. This
shows that the offence is having an impact and sends a strong message that
coercive or controlling behaviour will not be tolerated.
On 21 January we published our landmark draft Domestic Abuse Bill and consultation
response which will transform the cross-Government response to this devastating
crime. The draft Bill includes provisions for a statutory definition of domestic abuse,
including economic abuse. Replacing ‘financial’ with ‘economic’ acknowledges how
broad this form of abuse is and how many aspects of a victim’s life it can affect, such
as limiting their access to fundamental resources such as money, food, transport,
employment and housing. This will raise awareness of the issue of economic abuse
and also enable frontline professionals and the criminal justice system to better
understand, recognise and tackle it, so that victims can be supported to achieve the
economic stability that they need.
The draft Bill is underpinned by a comprehensive package of non-legislative action
which we have set out in our consultation response, including a commitment to
review the effectiveness of the coercive or controlling behaviour offence to ensure it
is fit for purpose and that it adequately protects victims from abuse. In addition, we
have committed to update the statutory guidance and CPS legal guidance on the
offence to include economic abuse and provide guidance on how this form of abuse
can manifest itself as part of a pattern of coercive control
Immigration Controls: Commonwealth
Sir John Hayes: [222775]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will introduce priority
passport checking gates for citizens entering the UK from (a) Australia, (b) New Zealand
and (c) other Commonwealth realms.
Caroline Nokes:
The Government has already announced that, from this summer, nationals of
Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Singapore as well as those from Japan, South
Korea and USA will be permitted to use our ePassport gates when crossing the UK
border.
The enabling legislation has recently completed its passage through Parliament and
the change is on track to be implemented as planned.
Immigration: EEA Nationals
Alex Chalk: [220968]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when the EU Settlement
Scheme will open to applications from EEA nationals.
Caroline Nokes:
The EU Settlement Scheme will be open to all EEA citizens, including citizens of the
EEA EFTA states (Norway Iceland and Liechtenstein) and Swiss citizens by 30
March 2019.
Immigration: EU Nationals
Dame Caroline Spelman: [222737]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether during the private beta
testing phase two of the EU Settlement Scheme his Department instructed local
authorities to support eligible non-UK EU children in care to secure British citizenship.
Caroline Nokes:
During the second Private Beta phase of the EU Settlement Scheme, participating
local authorities were not instructed to support eligible EU national children in care to
secure British citizenship.
Local authorities participated on a voluntary basis to apply on behalf of some children
in their care. Only looked after EU national children (within the meaning of section
22(1) of the Children Act 1989) were eligible to participate in this phase of the
scheme. The Private Beta phase did not involve applications for British citizenship,
which is a separate process.
Dame Caroline Spelman: [222790]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many non-UK EU children
are residing in the five local authorities selected by his Department for the private beta
testing phase two of the EU Settlement Scheme in (a) total and (b) in each local authority
pilot site area.
Caroline Nokes:
The Home Office does not hold data on how many EU National children reside in the
five local authorities which participated in the second Private Beta test phase of the
EU Settlement Scheme.
Dame Caroline Spelman: [222791]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate he has made of
(a) the number of non-UK EU children in care and (b) the number of those children in
each local authority that were part of his Department's private beta phase two testing pilot
by (i) age and (ii) EU nationality.
Caroline Nokes:
The precise number of non-UK EU children in care is not known. Local authorities do
not routinely collect this data. The Home Office has estimated that there are
approximately 5,000 EU children in care in the UK, not including care leavers. This
estimate is based on ONS data on the proportion of EEA citizens per Local Authority
and government data on volumes of children in care per Local Authority
The second Private Beta phase included some applications for Looked After Children
made by five local authorities. The local authorities which participated did so
voluntarily for some of the EU children in their care. In total 19 applications were
made on behalf of looked after children by these local authorities. Applicants were
aged between 5-17 and comprised 6 different nationalities.
Dame Caroline Spelman: [222792]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate he has made of
the number of non-UK EU children in care who could not take part in his Department's
private beta phase test pilot (a) in total and (b) in each local authority pilot site because
they did not have a passport.
Caroline Nokes:
According to the rules laid before parliament (on 11/10/2018) for the second Private
Beta phase of the EU Settlement Scheme, only a child being looked after (within the
meaning of section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989) by one of the five named local
authorities, with a chipped passport, was eligible to apply.
The Home Office did not estimate the number of children who could not take part in
the Private Beta phase because they did not have a passport.
All EU applicants, including looked after children, will be able to apply with an ID card
or a passport once the scheme is rolled out fully from 30 March 2019. In addition,
from that date it will be possible for applicants to submit alternative evidence of their
identity and nationality where they are unable to provide a passport or national
identity card due to circumstances outside of their control, or for compelling practical
or compassionate reasons.
Dame Caroline Spelman: [222793]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many non-UK EU children
in care took part in the Home Office's private beta testing phase two of the EU Settlement
Scheme (a) in total and (b) in each local authority area; how many (i) received settled
status, (ii) received pre-settled status, (iii) were refused, (iv) requested an administrative
review (A) in total and (B) in each local authority area.
Caroline Nokes:
In total 19 applications were made on behalf of looked after children by the
participating local authorities. We are unable to provide a breakdown by local
authority as this may identify some of the children involved.
16 have received settled status.
0 have received pre-settled status
0 have been refused
0 have requested an administrative review
We are working with the relevant local authorities to gather further evidence for the 3
outstanding cases.
Knives: Crime
Hugh Gaffney: [214072]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps he is taking to tackle
incidents of knife crime on the railways.
Victoria Atkins:
The chances of being a victim of crime, on the railways or elsewhere, remain
extremely low. However, the Government is very concerned about increases in knife
crime and its impact on victims, families and communities. The action we are taking is
set out in our Serious Violence Strategy and includes new legislation in the Offensive
Weapons Bill and continuing police action under Operation Sceptre. The British
Transport Police also participate in Operation Sceptre and we expect the next
national week of action to take place in March 2019.
More widely, we have also been supporting the #knifefree media campaign to raise
awareness of the consequences of knife crime and discourage young people from
carrying knives more generally. The Serious Violence Strategy includes a strong
focus on prevention and early intervention to stop young people being drawn in to
knife crime. Our Early Intervention Youth Fund of £22 million is already supporting 29
projects in England and Wales. Over £17 million has already been allocated to
projects delivering interventions to young people at risk of criminal involvement, gang
exploitation and county lines.
We are supporting 68 small community projects this year through the anti-knife crime
Community Fund. In addition, we have extended our support for Redthread in
hospital emergency departments to introduce its “teachable moment” youth violence
intervention work to hospi-tals in Birmingham and Nottingham.
Sir John Hayes: [222773]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps he is taking to
support police officers to reduce knife crime.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Government supports the police in their important work to tackle knife crime in a
number of ways. We continue to encourage forces to participate in the national
weeks of enforcement action under Operation Sceptre, co-ordinated by the National
Police Chiefs’ Council. Results from the September 2018 phase of Operation Sceptre
are as follows:
• All 44 police forces took part in the week of action. • Over the course of the week of
action a total of 1002 arrests were made
• A total of 1779 stop and searches were carried out
• 9302 knives were surrendered or seized
• 1158 weapon sweeps were conducted, resulting in the recovery of 172 knives and
other weapons. In addition, 8781 knives were surrendered
• 496 test purchase operations were carried out in retail premises. Of these, there
were 397 passes. 99 resulted in the retail outlet failing the test purchase
• 1280 education events - including workshops, were also held in schools to raise
awareness of the dangers of carrying knives.
The next week under Operation Sceptre is taking place in March.
We are encouraging the police to use stop and search. It is a vital policing tool when
used correctly and officers have the Government's full support to use these powers in
a targeted way that is fair, lawful and effective. We are looking at ways to work with
the police to reduce bureaucracy and increase efficiency in the use of this power. We
have also listened to the police re-quest that we introduce new Knife Crime
Prevention Orders to help them to divert those involved in knife crime away from a
violent lifestyle. The Government is seeking to introduce the new Order through
amendments to the Offensive Weapons Bill.
The Offensive Weapons Bill, currently passing through Parliament, includes specific
new knives offences, in particular making it an offence to possess certain offensive
weapons in private, and stopping knives being sent to residential addresses after
they are bought online. These measures are designed to help the police in their
response to knife crime.
In addition to supporting the police on law enforcement, our Serious Violence
Strategy stresses the importance of early intervention to tackle the root causes of
serious violence and provide young people with the skills and resilience to lead
productive lives free from violence. Our Early Intervention Youth Fund is already
supporting 29 projects in England and Wales, and our anti-knife crime Community
Fund is supporting 68 local community projects to tackle knife crime. Our national
knife crime media campaign - #knifefree – also aims to raise awareness of the
consequences of knife crime and to discourage young people from carrying knives.
Organised Crime
Dr Matthew Offord: [222593]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent steps he has taken
to tackle serious and organised crime; and if he will make a statement.
Mr Ben Wallace:
Serious and organised crime affects more of us, more often, than any other national
security threat, persistently eroding our economy and our communities. It costs the
UK at least £37 billion every year.
The newly updated Serious and Organised Crime Strategy, published on 1st
November 2018, sets out how the Government will mobilise the full force of the state
and align the collective efforts of key partners from the public, private and voluntary
sectors to tackle serious and organised crime together in one single approach.
The cross-system approach is aligned to the four strategy objectives:
(i) Relentless disruption and targeted action against the highest harm serious and
organised criminals and networks affecting the UK
(ii) Building the highest levels of defence and resilience in vulnera-ble people,
communities, businesses and systems
(iii) Stopping the problem at source, identifying and supporting those at risk of
engaging in criminality
(iv) Establishing a single, whole-system response, aligning the ef-forts of all those
involved in responding to serious and organised crime as one, cohesive system.
The Government has already made some early progress in implementing the Serious
and Organised Crime Strategy. For example, we have established new community
coordinators in five pilot areas to promote community resilience and divert people
away from serious and organised crime. We have also recruited a new cross-
government overseas policy specialists network to complement existing international
law enforcement operational work
The Government is determined to prevent serious and organised crime, defend
against it, track down perpetrators and bring them to justice. We will allow no safe
space – online or offline – for these people and their networks.
Police Patrolling
Sir John Hayes: [222805]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much and what proportion
of a police officer's time is spent on walking patrol in their local community.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office does not hold centrally the information requested.
Police: Finance
Keith Vaz: [200549]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what criteria are used in the
allocation of police funding to tackle violent crime.
Victoria Atkins:
The Government understands that police demand is changing and becoming
increasingly complex. That is why we have provided a strong and comprehensive
funding settlement for the police that will increase funding by £970million compared
to 2018/19, including precept, pensions funding and national investment.
In relation to tackling violent crime, our Serious Violence Strategy, published in April
2018, is supported by £40million over 2 years to deliver initiatives that tackle serious
violence, this includes: an Early Intervention Youth Fund of £22 million which is
already supporting 29 projects in England and Wales. Over £17 million has already
been allocated to projects delivering interventions to young people at risk of criminal
involvement, gang exploitation and county lines.
Other funding we have made available to tackle serious violence includes: £3.6million
to set up a National County Lines Co-ordination Centre; a Community Fund that
provided £1.5 million this year to support 68 projects; and £1.4m to support a new
national police capability to tackle gang related activity on social media.
Police funding continues to be a priority for the Home Secretary and we are working
closely with the police sector to better understand the demand landscape.
Police: Managers
Sir John Hayes: [222808]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps his Department has
taken to reduce the amount and proportion of police funding spent on administrative and
managerial roles.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The 2019-20 police funding settlement provides the biggest increase in police funding
since 2010, with more money for local police forces, counter terrorism and tackling
serious and organised crime.
At the 2018/19 police funding settlement, we set out clear priorities for the police to
deliver this year on efficiency, productivity and financial transparency. The police
developed a plan and are on track to deliver £120 million in commercial and back
office savings by 2020/21.
As I set out in my Written Ministerial Statement of 24 January the investment of up to
£970 million, including council tax precept, in the 2019/20 police settlement will
support four key pillars of police effectiveness. Firstly, it will help increase capacity,
secondly it will assist crime prevention, thirdly we will enhance the support we offer to
hard-working frontline police officers and staff. And finally, by ensuring system
leaders provide national direction on performance, including through working more
smartly, with the digitally enabled modern tools to police effectively.
However, it is for the individually elected PCC’s to determine how to allocate their
resources as they are best placed to understand the needs of the communities they
serve.
Prisoners: Repatriation
Mr Philip Hollobone: [224314]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many foreign national
offenders have been repatriated under the early removal scheme by country since 2010.
Caroline Nokes:
The Home Office publishes quarterly statistics on the number of Foreign Na-tional
Offenders (FNO) that have been removed from the UK under the Early Removal
Scheme. This information can be found by accessing the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/immigration-enforcement-data-
november-2018
The Home Office does not routinely disclose country specific information re-garding
the deportation of FNOs as its disclosure could prejudice relations between the UK
and foreign governments.
Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre: Per Capita Costs
Chi Onwurah: [222642]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the cost per detainee is of
detaining someone at Yarlswood immigration removal centre; and how that cost is
calculated.
Caroline Nokes:
The Costs of individual Removal centres are commercially sensitive. The costs for
calculating the average daily cost of a removal centre are as below.
The costs are derived at by dividing the Total Resource Costs of running Detention
Centres (Contracts, staff, Rent, Rates, Utilities and Depreciation) by the average
number of bed spaces (currently 3448).
The average cost to detain an individual in immigration detention is provided on a per
day basis. The current daily cost per detainee is £88.29, which corresponds to an
annual cost of £32,227 (£88.29 multiplied by 365 days). Data can be found at the link
below
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/immigration-enforcement-data-
november-2018
HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Buildings: Insulation
Mr Steve Reed: [224341]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 6 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation and with
reference to the Buildings Research Establishment interim report entitled Fire
performance of cladding materials research – experimental methodology and
performance criteria, who the members are of the referenced project steering group.
Mr Steve Reed: [224342]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 6 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation and the
interim report entitled, Fire Performance of Cladding Materials Research – Experimental
methodology and performance criteria prepared by the Building Research Establishment
for his Department, if he will publish the minutes of the meetings of the (a) Project
Steering Group and (b) Project team.
Kit Malthouse:
So as to allow the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation,
the Department does not routinely release the details of members of research project
steering groups or minutes of meetings. Full details of the work will be published after
it is completed.
Mr Steve Reed: [224343]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 11 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation and the
interim report entitled, Fire Performance of Cladding Materials Research – Experimental
methodology and performance criteria prepared by the Building Research Establishment
for his Department, on what date his Department approved the bespoke testing
methodology.
Kit Malthouse:
The Department approved the methodology set out in the interim report on 22 August
2018.
Mr Steve Reed: [224344]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 11 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation and the
interim report entitled, Fire Performance of Cladding Materials Research – Experimental
methodology and performance criteria prepared by the Building Research Establishment
for his Department, if he will publish the (a) success and (b) failure criteria for the new
bespoke test methodology when testing cladding and other building materials.
Mr Steve Reed: [224345]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 11 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation and the
interim report of the Building Research Establishment for his Department entitled Fire
Performance of Cladding Materials Research – Experimental methodology and
performance criteria, whether materials that fail the bespoke test will be subject to further
BS 8414 large scale tests.
Mr Steve Reed: [224346]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 11 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation and with
reference to the interim report of the Building Research Establishment (BRE) for his
Department entitled Fire Performance of Cladding Materials Research – Experimental
methodology and performance criteria, whether the BRE advised against the
development of a bespoke testing methodology for insulation.
Kit Malthouse:
At this stage the study is aimed at developing a better understanding of the behaviour
of a range of cladding products when exposed to fire and their possible contribution
to fire spread.
A bespoke testing methodology for insulation was not considered necessary for this
stage of the research. There are a comparatively small number of insulation materials
available and their behaviour when exposed to fire is already well documented.
There are no success or failure criteria, the findings will help determine, in
consultation with the expert panel, any further action we should take. This could
include further testing at large scale and/or advice to building owners.
Citizens' Juries
Daniel Zeichner: [223903]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will
place in the Library the list of local authority areas which have bid successfully to begin
local Innovation in Democracy pilots.
Jake Berry:
The Innovation in Democracy Pilot Programme (IIDP) is a great opportunity for local
people to get involved in influencing policy decisions through facilitated partnerships
with their local authorities. Successful areas will be announced shortly and will be
published on www.gov.uk.
Homelessness: Finance
Stephanie Peacock: [223927]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how
much funding from the Homelessness Relief Fund was granted to (a) Barnsley, (b) South
Yorkshire and (c) nationally in each year since that fund was established.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
Local authorities across the country receive funding to prevent and relieve
homelessness from my Department. This includes preventing homelessness core
funding and flexible homelessness support grant funding. However, we do not
operate a fund called the Homelessness Relief Fund and are therefore unable to
provide the specific information you request.
Housing Infrastructure Fund
John Healey: [222600]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
assessment he has made of the value for money of the Housing Infrastructure Fund.
James Brokenshire:
Bids for funding from the Housing Infrastructure Fund are subject to a robust
assessment covering value for money, strategic fit and deliverability. On 28 January
2019, the Department published its Housing Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy that
included a commitment to evaluate the Housing Infrastructure Fund.
Housing: Construction
John Healey: [222597]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with
reference to the National Audit Office report entitled Planning for new homes, published 8
February 2019, what plans he has to revise the standard method for assessing housing
need in order for it to be consistent with the Government's ambition to deliver 300,000
new homes per year by the mid-2020s.
James Brokenshire:
In the Government response to the Technical consultation on updates to national
planning policy and guidance, published on 19 February 2019, we confirmed that the
standard method will be revised in accordance with the proposals consulted on.
These changes ensures that the standard method remains consistent with enabling
the housing market to deliver 300,000 homes a year on average by the mid-2020s.
Housing: Prices
John Healey: [222601]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with
reference to the National Audit Office report entitled Planning for new homes, published 8
February 2019, what steps he plans to take in response to the National Audit Office
finding that developer contributions to the cost of infrastructure and affordable housing
are not keeping pace with increases in house prices.
James Brokenshire:
The Department does not respond to NAO reports ahead of Public Account
Committee (PAC) hearings. The Department will respond to the PAC
recommendations, following the PAC hearing, via the Treasury Minute process.
We recently consulted on draft regulations intended to ensure Community
Infrastructure Levy is more market responsive. The consultation closed on 31
January. The Government will publish its response in due course.
Local Government Finance
Mr Clive Betts: [224297]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the oral contribution of 5 February 2019 of the Under-Secretary of State for Housing,
Communities and Local Government, Official Report column 289, how that 4 per cent
figure relating to deprivation was calculated.
Rishi Sunak:
The Government is undertaking a review of the relative needs and resources of local
authorities in England, with a view to setting fresh baseline funding levels in 2020-21.
We are working closely with local government representatives and others to consider
the drivers of local authorities’ costs, the resources available locally to fund services,
and how we should account for these in a way that draws a more transparent and
understandable link between local circumstances and resource allocations.
In December 2018 the Government published a consultation paper, which set out a
proposed approach to assessing the relative needs of local authorities. Our analysis
has shown that for many universal services, the number of people in each local
authority area is the most important predictor of the costs that councils face in
delivering those services. The consultation therefore proposes the introduction of a
simple population-based Foundation Formula to account for many of the universal
services that local authorities deliver, alongside several specific funding formulas for
some of the largest and most complex service areas.
To understand whether including additional ‘cost drivers’, including deprivation,
significantly improves the precision of the Foundation Formula, a comparison was
made between the amount of variation in past expenditure that was explained by
different combinations of cost drivers, to the total amount of variation in expenditure.
The basis on which this comparison was made is set out in pages 19 to 21 of the
consultation paper (link below). Whilst, in aggregate terms, deprivation was not
shown to be a major cost driver for the services included in the Foundation Formula,
to ensure that deprivation is appropriately accounted for in the relative needs
assessment, deprivation, or a suitable proxy for deprivation, is taken into account in
four of the service-specific formulas that were proposed.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-local-authorities-relative-
needs-and-resources.
Local Government Services
Bridget Phillipson: [224324]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether
his Department has made an assessment of the correlation between changes in (a) local
authority funding and (b) changes in the level of provision of local authority services,
excluding social care, since 2010.
Bridget Phillipson: [224325]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether
he has made an assessment of the correlation between the (a) increased proportion of
local authority spending on social care, (b) reduction in local authority overall spending on
services other than social care and (c) decrease in local authority funding since 2010;
and if he will make a statement.
Rishi Sunak:
As democratically elected organisations, local authorities are independent of central
government, and are responsible for managing their budgets in line with local
priorities and their legal duties.
Central government funding cannot in isolation provide a true representation of local
authority finances. The responsibilities, structure and makeup of local authorities
have changed significantly since 2010 and spending power, formula grants and
settlement funding assessments are not directly comparable over this period. For
example, with the introduction of the Business Rates Retention Scheme, local
authorities estimate they will keep around £2.4 billion in business rates growth in
2018-19.
As announced in the Local Government Finance Settlement, Core Spending Power is
forecast to increase from £45.1 billion in 2018-19 to £46.4 billion in 2019-20. This is a
cash-increase of 2.8 per cent and real-terms increase in resources available to local
authorities. In the long term, the Spending Review will determine funding for local
government from 2020-21 onwards and will enable us to look at local government
spending in the round.
Local Plans
John Healey: [222598]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will
list the local authorities that (a) do and (b) do not have an up-to-date local plan.
James Brokenshire:
It is essential for authorities to have up to date plan policies in place to plan for our
housing needs and to provide clarity that communities and developers about where
new homes should be built. It also helps ensure that development is planned for and
is sustainable rather than the result of speculative applications.
It is up to Local Planning Authorities to determine if their plans are up to date and
they must review their plans at least every five years to ensure that policies remain
relevant and effectively address the needs of the local community. Reviewing does
not necessarily mean updating is required, but they should take account of changing
circumstances or changes in national policy.
The Planning Inspectorate publishes local plan progress at:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/777040/LPA_Strategic_Plan_Progress_-
_1_February_2019._GOV.UK.pdf.
Planning Inspectorate
John Healey: [222599]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government,with
reference to the National Audit Office report entitled Planning for new homes, published 8
February 2019, what plans he has to improve the performance of the Planning
Inspectorate.
James Brokenshire:
The Government believes that all parties should benefit from a more efficient
planning appeal process with faster decision-making, and that this will require
additional resource. The Planning Inspectorate has recently undertaken a successful
recruitment campaign which will see a further 100 Inspectors and Appeals Planning
Officers join the organisation over the coming months. On 12 February, we published
an independent review by Bridget Rosewell CBE into the planning appeal inquiry
process which has made 22 practical recommendations to enhance and speed up the
process. We will work closely with the Planning Inspectorate to implement the Review
recommendations.
Planning: Skilled Workers
John Healey: [222602]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with
reference to the National Audit Office report entitled Planning for new homes, published 8
February 2019, what steps he plans to take to address the National Audit Office finding
that his Department does not understand the extent of skills shortages in the planning
sector.
John Healey: [222604]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of levels of staffing in local authority
planning departments.
James Brokenshire:
The Government recognises that having well-resourced and skilled planning
departments is essential for the delivery of our ambitious housing programme, which
is why we increased planning application fees by 20 per cent in January 2018. We
are working with the Local Government Association and the Royal Town Planning
Institute to assess the resourcing and skills needs in council planning departments.
Private Rented Housing
Diana Johnson: [224313]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
plans he has to bring forward legislative proposals to amend the Homes (Fitness for
Human Habitation) Act 2018 to extend the terms of that Act to people who have been
tenants of private landlords for longer than seven years.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
The Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act (2018) does not have regard to the
total number of years a person has been a tenant of a private landlord but rather the
length of the term of the tenancy and the date the tenancy was agreed.
The Act will apply to tenants who have:
• a tenancy agreed before 20 March 2019, with a term of less than seven years, from
20 March 2020.
• a tenancy agreed on or after 20 March 2019 or have made a significant change in
their tenancy, with a term of less than seven years, from the date the Act comes
into force.
The Act will apply in the same way to tenants of a private landlord where the term of
the tenancy is for more than seven years, but where the landlord has the option to
terminate the tenancy before the expiry of the seven years.
There are currently no plans to amend the Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act
2018.
Sleeping Rough
Liam Byrne: [224478]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with
reference to the Rough Sleeping Strategy, published in August 2018, what steps he is
taking to ensure that (a) Safeguarding Adult Reviews are conducted when a person who
sleeps rough (i) dies and (ii) is seriously harmed as a result of abuse or neglect and (b)
the implementation of processes to (i) record and (ii) learn lessons from those deaths.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
My Department is working with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)
through the Rough Sleeping and Homelessness Reduction Taskforce to ensure that
Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SARs) are conducted when appropriate and that rough
sleepers have the health care they need, when they need it.
We are ensuring that where a homeless person dies, or there has been serious harm,
SARs take place where appropriate, so that local services can learn lessons from
these tragic events to better prevent them from happening in the future.
DHSC is working with Safeguarding Adult Boards to ensure that SARs are conducted
when a person who sleeps rough dies, or is seriously harmed as a result of abuse or
neglect, whether known or suspected, and there is concern that partner agencies
could have worked more effectively to protect the adult. Lessons learned from these
reviews will inform improvements in local systems and services.
They are working with the Local Government Association (LGA) to develop a series
of national events in 2019/20 to look at safeguarding and homelessness and how we
can share learning from reviews into rough sleeper deaths. DHSC is also
commissioning King’s College London to conduct a thematic review of the national
SAR library on rough sleeping cases.
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Africa: Tax Evasion
Adam Afriyie: [223497]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps her Department
has taken to reduce tax evasion in Africa.
Harriett Baldwin:
Tackling tax evasion is a priority for DFID as part of our Transparency Agenda, Addis
Tax Initiative commitments and the UK Anti-Corruption Strategy.
Since 2013 DFID has supported the Global Forum for the Exchange of Information
for Tax Purposes through its International Tax Transparency Programme. The Global
Forum helps countries tackle tax evasion by strengthening global tax transparency
and international cooperation. The Global Forum now has over 150 members and
DFID supports its Africa Initiative to strengthen transparency and the exchange of
information across Africa.
HMRC and DFID continues to work alongside the Global Forum with other
jurisdictions such as Egypt, Ghana and Nigeria; alongside the African Tax
Administration Forum in Uganda and independently in Montserrat to support the
implementation of the Automatic Exchange of Information.
DFID’s announcement on the 19 February of a new £47m package of support for Tax
for Development will further boost efforts to help countries in Africa and elsewhere to
tackle this important issue.
Africa: Taxation
Adam Afriyie: [223498]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how much additional tax
revenue will be raised by Governments in Africa as a result of support by her Department
by the year 2022-23.
Harriett Baldwin:
DFID’s support will help strengthen developing country capacity to raise domestic
resources, including through assistance in the implementation of international tax
standards. Although many factors impact on revenue growth, so forecasts are not
available, past DFID tax programmes have proved to be great value for money. For
example, the OECD’s Tax Inspectors Without Borders initiative, which assists
developing countries to implement international tax standards, has generated an
additional £100 for every £1 spent on operating costs.
Alan Guttmacher Institute
Fiona Bruce: [224485]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, with reference to her
Department's paper entitled, Single Departmental Plan - Results Achieved by Sector in
2012-2018, Family Planning, what steps her Department has taken to verify the numbers
of illegal backstreet abortions provided by the Guttmacher Institute; and whether her
Department has conducted a separate estimate of those abortions.
Alistair Burt:
DFID’s single departmental plan reports on the increase in family planning use from
our programmes. From this, estimates are made, based on the best international
expertise, on wider impact. The Guttmacher Institute’s reputation for producing high
quality scientific research and data for evidence-based policy making on Sexual &
Reproductive Health and Rights means we have confidence in these independent
estimates.
Other studies support the key Guttmacher Institute finding that unsafe abortion is a
significant killer of women and restricting safe abortion does not make abortion less
common, it just makes it less safe.
Developing Countries: UK Relations with EU
Nigel Dodds: [223501]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what discussions she has
had with the EU on continuing co-operation on international development after the UK
leaves the EU.
Harriett Baldwin:
We are seeking a future partnership with the EU on international development to
tackle shared global challenges in areas where it is in our mutual interest and
represents the best value for taxpayers’ money. The Secretary of State and other
DFID Ministers have discussed our future partnership with counterparts in the
Commission during bilateral meetings and in the margins of international events. Any
future UK participation in EU development programmes would require appropriate
influence and oversight over UK funds and eligibility for UK organisations to bid for
and to implement any UK funded programmes.
Niger: Marie Stopes International
Fiona Bruce: [224486]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, with reference to the Answer
of 20 December 2018 to Question HL12251 on Kenya: Marie Stopes International, if he
will publish the conclusions of the investigation into alleged illegal abortions practices by
Marie Stopes International in Niger.
Alistair Burt:
We have seen no evidence of any illegal activity in Niger on their part and no formal
allegations have been made to us. DFID funds cannot be used to fund any illegal
activities. We treat allegations of any improper use of funds extremely seriously. The
process for reporting allegations is on our website:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-international-
development
Overseas Aid
Sir John Hayes: [223132]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what recent steps she has
taken to ensure the effectiveness Official Development Assistance.
Harriett Baldwin:
Every project in DFID is rigorously appraised for efficiency and likely effectiveness
before approval and is assessed against a robust monitoring framework to ensure it
remains cost effective. The Independent Commission for Aid Impact said that DFID’s
systems “improve the return on UK investment in aid” and recognised that DFID is “a
global champion on Value for Money”. DFID is committed to supporting other
government departments strengthen the quality of their aid spending and maximising
their impact on poverty through an extensive offer of support.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Food: Import Duties
Hugh Gaffney: [224358]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what recent estimate he has made
of the level of tariffs that could be applied by both the UK and EU to food exports in the
event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal.
George Hollingbery:
Upon leaving the EU, the UK will be responsible for its own independent tariff regime.
The UK will not be responsible for the tariffs the EU sets on its imports. The EU has
stated through its technical notices that it will apply the EU’s Common External Tariff
to UK exports in the event of a no deal, including on food products. The
Government’s tariff schedule for a no deal scenario is being finalised. Once a final
decision has been taken, we will bring forward legislation to the House and
communicate this in an appropriate way for a market sensitive announcement.
Trade Agreements
Danielle Rowley: [224362]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what steps his Department is taking
to ensure that new trade deals do not affect the ability of the UK to (a) regulate in the
public interest and (b) protect public services.
George Hollingbery:
Protecting the UK’s right to regulate in the public interest and protect public services,
including the NHS, is of the utmost importance. The UK’s public services are
protected by specific exceptions and reservations in EU trade agreements - including
the recent EU-Canada agreement (CETA) - and, as we leave the EU, the UK will
continue to ensure that rigorous protections are included in all trade agreements it is
party to. The Government has been consistently clear that we are committed to the
fundamental principles of the NHS - that it is universal and free at the point of need.
We will ensure that no trade agreements alter these fundamental facts.
Trade Agreements: NHS
Danielle Rowley: [224363]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what assessment he has made of
the potential risks to the NHS as a result of future trade deals after the UK leaves the EU.
George Hollingbery:
Protecting the UK’s right to regulate in the public interest and protect public services,
including the NHS, is of the utmost importance. The UK’s public services are
protected by specific exceptions and reservations in EU trade agreements - including
the recent EU-Canada agreement (CETA) - and, as we leave the EU, the UK will
continue to ensure that rigorous protections are included in all trade agreements it is
party to. The Government has been consistently clear that we are committed to the
fundamental principles of the NHS - that it is universal and free at the point of need.
We will ensure that no trade agreements alter these fundamental facts.
Danielle Rowley: [224364]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, if he will take steps to ensure that
future trade deals will not make it easier for private companies to provide NHS services.
George Hollingbery:
The UK will continue to ensure that decisions about the NHS are made by UK
Governments, including the Devolved Administrations, not our trade partners. The UK
will determine whether private companies should be involved in providing services
under contract, and if so to what extent. Trade deals will give no greater access for
private companies, domestic or overseas, to NHS services.
World Trade Organisation: Reform
Andrew Rosindell: [224481]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what steps he plans to take to
promote WTO reform and free trade after the UK leaves the EU.
George Hollingbery:
The UK is a strong supporter of the rules-based multilateral trading system and global
trade liberalisation.
The WTO is the bedrock of rules-based free trade. The UK welcomed the
commitment made at the G20 Summit last year in December to support the
necessary reform of the WTO to improve its functioning. Following the UK’s departure
from the EU, the UK will continue to champion discussions on WTO reform, and
engage with WTO Members at international fora and in our bilateral engagements, in
particular on the importance of updating rules on digital trade and ensuring that the
WTO dispute settlement system is not undermined. G20 Leaders are committed to
return to this matter at their Summit in June.
JUSTICE
Cannabis: Misuse
Norman Lamb: [222733]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people were (a) prosecuted and (b)
cautioned for cannabis possession offences in each police authority area in each of the
last two years.
Rory Stewart:
As per your previous question (PQ 157684 from 27/06/2018), data is available up to
December 2017, and data for the year ending December 2018 will be published in
May. Therefore, the response is the same as before:
(a) The number of people prosecuted for cannabis possession in each police
authority has been published up to December 2017 and can be found in the ‘Court
Outcomes by Police Force Area data tool’, available at the following link:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/733996/court-outcomes-by-pfa-2017-update.xlsx
Select court type: ‘02: Magistrates Court’
Select offence: ’92E.01 Possession of a controlled drug - Class B (cannabis)’ and
‘92E.02 Possession of a controlled drug – Class C (cannabis)’ in the ‘Offence’ filter.
The number of people proceeded against by police force area can be found in the
table.
(b) The number of people cautioned for cannabis possession in each police authority
can be found in the table attached.
Attachments:
1. Aformentioned Table [Copy of PQ222733 table.xlsx]
Feltham Young Offender Institution
Seema Malhotra: [224338]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what progress has been made in implementing
the Secure STAIRS framework at HM Young Offenders Institute Feltham; and what
assessment he has made on the potential effect of that framework on the levels of (a)
violence and (b) disruptive behaviour at that institution.
Seema Malhotra: [224340]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether a custody support plan that provides
each young offender with a weekly review by a nominated officer is in place at HM Young
Offenders Institute Feltham.
Edward Argar:
A staggered roll out of the SECURE STAIRS framework has commenced at HMYOI
Feltham with HMYOI Feltham’s Enhanced Support Unit (ESU) currently working to
the Framework. Roll out will continue over the coming year. It is too early in the
project to draw any conclusions on the impact on violence or disruptive behaviour at
HMYOI Feltham.
The Custody Support Plan (CuSP) has been implemented in the ESU and the ESU
CuSP Officers are engaging in their allocated young person’s case formulation
meetings as per the joint HMPPS YCS and NHS England Behaviour Management
Strategy. Full implementation is planned for the end of March 2020.
Ministry of Justice: Bullying
Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck: [222806]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of (a) disabled and (b) all other
staff in his Department reported experiencing bullying or harassment at work in the most
recent Civil Service People Survey.
Edward Argar:
Bullying and harassment has no place in any workplace, including the Civil Service.
In our most recent People Survey 11% of respondents, on average, told us that
they'd experienced bullying or harassment at work in the 12 months preceding the
survey.
While this figure has remained stable since 2016, we recognise that some staff are
more like to say they have experienced this type of unacceptable behaviour than
others. This includes those with long-term limiting conditions who, in the vast majority
of departments and agencies, were more likely to say they'd been bullied or harassed
in the last 12 months than staff members with no long-term limiting conditions.
We are strengthening the routes for all staff to report bullying and harassment to
ensure that they are fully supported throughout the process, and to ensure cultures
are positive and inclusive.
The high level People Survey results for each organisation, including reported rates
of bullying and harassment, were published last December on gov.uk.
Each spring the Cabinet Office conducts and publishes a range of further analysis on
the People Survey responses, including the results by gender, ethnicity, sexual
orientation and health status. Similar analysis will be conducted again this year and
made available on gov.uk.
The results for the 2017 survey are summarised below with the organisations that
make up the MoJ highlighted. A copy of this table has been placed in the House.
Civil Service People Survey 2017: results by organisation and health status
Long-term health status is captured in the People Survey through questions J04 and
J04A. J04 asks if the individual has a "long-standing physical or mental health
condition, illness, impairment or disability?" and, if they answer yes, J04A asks
whether their condition, illness or disability has an impact on their daily activity or the
work they can do.
Results are aggregated in to two broad categories: "No long-term limiting condition",
combining those who answer “No” to either J04 or J04A; and, "Long-term limiting
condition", those who answer “Yes” to J04 and who answer that their condition limits
what they can do either "a little" or "a lot" at J04A .
ANSWERED “YES” TO THE
QUESTION “DURING THE PAST
12 MONTHS HAVE YOU
PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED
BULLYING OR HARASSMENT AT
WORK?”
NO LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
HAS A LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
Acas 8% 21%
Accountant in Bankruptcy 4% 0%
Animal and Plant Health
Agency
10% 23%
Attorney General's Office 4% ..
Cabinet Office 9% 19%
Centre for Environment,
Fisheries and Aquaculture
Science
7% 22%
Charity Commission 10% 22%
Civil Service HR 13% 22%
Companies House 4% 11%
Competition and Markets
Authority
11% 33%
Criminal Injuries
Compensation Authority
8% 31%
Crown Commercial Service 10% 20%
Crown Office and Procurator
Fiscal Service
10% 35%
Crown Prosecution Service 8% 21%
Defence Electronics and
Components Agency
17% 38%
Defence Equipment & Support 10% 25%
ANSWERED “YES” TO THE
QUESTION “DURING THE PAST
12 MONTHS HAVE YOU
PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED
BULLYING OR HARASSMENT AT
WORK?”
NO LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
HAS A LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
Department for Business,
Energy and Industrial Strategy
6% 15%
Department for Communities
and Local Government
6% 19%
Department for Digital, Culture,
Media and Sport
4% 12%
Department for Education 7% 17%
Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs
7% 16%
Department for Exiting the
European Union
6% 25%
Department for International
Development
10% 20%
Department for International
Trade
10% 17%
Department for Transport 6% 14%
Department for Work and
Pensions
8% 20%
Department of Health 6% 9%
Disclosure Scotland 9% 27%
Driver and Vehicle Licensing
Agency
6% 16%
Driver and Vehicle Standards
Agency
17% 37%
Dstl 10% 27%
Education Scotland 19% 36%
Estyn 5% ..
ANSWERED “YES” TO THE
QUESTION “DURING THE PAST
12 MONTHS HAVE YOU
PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED
BULLYING OR HARASSMENT AT
WORK?”
NO LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
HAS A LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
FCO Services 9% 37%
Food Standards Agency 16% 27%
Food Standards Scotland 8% 7%
Foreign and Commonwealth
Office
12% 22%
Government Actuary's
Department
7% ..
Government Internal Audit
Agency
9% 21%
Government Legal Department 8% 11%
Health and Safety Executive 10% 21%
HM Courts and Tribunals
Service
8% 21%
HM CPS Inspectorate 31% ..
HM Inspectorate of
Constabulary and Fire &
Rescue Services
20% 23%
HM Prison and Probation
Service HQ
10% 14%
HM Revenue & Customs 9% 22%
HM Treasury 7% 20%
Home Office: Border Force 14% 40%
Home Office: HM Passport
Office
11% 25%
Home Office: Immigration
Enforcement
13% 28%
Home Office: Policy and 9% 21%
ANSWERED “YES” TO THE
QUESTION “DURING THE PAST
12 MONTHS HAVE YOU
PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED
BULLYING OR HARASSMENT AT
WORK?”
NO LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
HAS A LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
Enablers
Home Office: UK Visas and
Immigration
9% 20%
Intellectual Property Office 7% 10%
Land Registry 6% 14%
Legal Aid Agency 5% 16%
Maritime and Coastguard
Agency
14% 42%
Medicines and Healthcare
products Regulatory Agency
9% 23%
Met Office 8% 21%
Ministry of Defence 10% 26%
Ministry of Justice HQ 7% 18%
MoJ Arms Length Bodies 6% 18%
National Crime Agency 11% 26%
National Records of Scotland 5% 12%
National Savings & Investment 7% 45%
Office for National Statistics 9% 18%
Office of Gas and Electricity
Markets
7% 11%
Office of Qualifications and
Examinations Regulation
7% 6%
Office of Rail and Road 12% 20%
Office of the Public Guardian 15% 26%
Office of the Scottish Charity
Regulator
15% ..
ANSWERED “YES” TO THE
QUESTION “DURING THE PAST
12 MONTHS HAVE YOU
PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED
BULLYING OR HARASSMENT AT
WORK?”
NO LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
HAS A LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
Ofsted 5% 15%
Public Health England 11% 19%
Registers of Scotland 7% 5%
Revenue Scotland 7% ..
Rural Payments Agency 10% 25%
Scotland, Wales & Northern
Ireland Offices
7% 15%
Scottish Courts and Tribunals
Service
7% 19%
Scottish Government 8% 17%
Scottish Housing Regulator 5% ..
Scottish Prison Service 15% 40%
Scottish Public Pensions
Agency
13% 23%
Serious Fraud Office 9% 20%
Student Awards Agency
Scotland
8% 16%
The Insolvency Service 6% 13%
The National Archives 5% 21%
The National Probation
Service
10% 25%
The Planning Inspectorate 4% 11%
The Prison Service 13% 28%
Transport Scotland 9% 17%
UK Debt Management Office 7% ..
ANSWERED “YES” TO THE
QUESTION “DURING THE PAST
12 MONTHS HAVE YOU
PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED
BULLYING OR HARASSMENT AT
WORK?”
NO LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
HAS A LIMITING LONG-TERM
ILLNESS
UK Export Finance 16% 7%
UK Hydrographic Office 8% 17%
UK Statistics Authority 15% ..
Valuation Office Agency 6% 17%
Vehicle Certification Agency 12% ..
Veterinary Medicines
Directorate
6% 27%
Welsh Government 7% 18%
Wilton Park 8% ..
Note: ‘..’ indicates value
supressed due to small sample
size
Veterans: Prison Sentences
Toby Perkins: [223148]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many former members of the armed forces
have served custodial sentences in each year since 2000.
Toby Perkins: [223163]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of the prison population has
previously served in the armed forces.
Edward Argar:
Since January 2015, all offenders coming into custody (convicted or remanded) are
asked at reception if they have previously served in the Armed Forces. The
department publishes this data quarterly and the number declaring has remained
stable at approximately 3.5% - 4%.
In October 2018, Ministry of Justice published Experimental Statistics on ex-service
personnel in the prison population (next release due October 2019), which indicated
that there were at least 2,032 former members of the Armed Services in prison as at
30 June 2018. Details of the report and breakdown can be found at:
1. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attach
ment_data/file/750708/ex-service-personnel-prison-population-2018.pdf
2. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attach
ment_data/file/750710/ex-service-personnel-2018.ods
We do not hold information on the number of former service personnel that have
served a custodial sentence for the years requested, which could only be obtained at
disproportionate cost.
The Ministry of Justice recognises the unique nature of those who served in the
Armed Forces and those prisoners who declare a military background are able to
access a range of specialist support, including from military charities who deliver
services in prisons.
Young Offenders: Rehabilitation
Seema Malhotra: [224339]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many young people are subject to a Youth
Rehabilitation Order in (a) the Feltham and Heston constituency and (b) England and
Wales.
Edward Argar:
The most recent published data shows that in 2017/18, there were 6,794 Youth
Rehabilitation Orders issued in England and Wales
The Ministry of Justice does not hold data for Feltham and Heston Constituency
specifically, but within Hounslow Youth Offending Service, of which Feltham and
Heston is a part, there were 43 Youth Rehabilitation Orders issued to children and
young people in 2017/18.
TRANSPORT
Crossrail Line
Sir John Hayes: [222812]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps are being taken to reduce the
cost to the public purse of delays in the construction of Crossrail.
Andrew Jones:
Crossrail Limited, the organisation responsible for delivering the project and a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Transport for London, are working to establish a robust delivery
schedule and gain certainty regarding the final cost of the project.
As announced in December, the Department is providing a loan of £1.3bn to the
Greater London Authority and an additional loan facility of up to £750m to Transport
for London to finance the remaining costs of the project. It is expected the project will
be completed within the revised funding envelope of £17.6bn.
With the financial package now in place, Crossrail Limited can focus on finishing
construction and moving ahead with the testing ready for the introduction of
passenger services as soon as possible.
Department for Transport: Contracts
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [222799]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much his Department paid to contractors
for (a) hotel accommodation and (b) travel costs in 2018.
Jesse Norman:
The Department consists of a central department and four agencies (the Driver &
Vehicle Licensing Agency, Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency, Vehicle Certification
Agency and Maritime & Coastguard Agency). We have estimated that the information
requested can only be provided at disproportionate cost and would exceed the £850
cost limit.
High Speed Two
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [222797]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will (a) list the assurances made to
petitioners that have been breached by HS2 Ltd and (b) provide the dates and details of
each of those breaches.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
(a) There has been one incident of non-compliance involving three related
Undertakings and Assurances (U&As), numbers 1969, 2553 and 1976 on the Public
Register.
(b) This incident of non-compliance occurred in the week commencing 16 October
2017. The incident involved the removal of tree branches for security reasons without
prior engagement with the Woodland Trust, as required by the assurance. As soon as
HS2 Ltd had identified this incident, works were stopped and the Woodland Trust was
notified. A full investigation subsequently took place, the investigation findings were
shared with the Trust, and mitigations recommended as a result of the investigation
were put in place.
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [222798]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when HS2 Ltd will publish the protocols for
dealing with breaches of assurance.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
In line with commitments made to the HS2 Phase 2a Commons Select Committee a
protocol for how to report a possible non-compliance with an Undertaking or
Assurance agreed for Phases 1 and 2a will be published no later than Royal Assent
for the HS2 Phase 2a hybrid Bill.
High Speed Two Railway Line: Buckinghamshire
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [223989]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will publish the (a) permissions and (b)
legal assurances for clearances of vegetation planned to take place on 200 acres near
Steeple Claydon Buckinghamshire by (i) HS2 Ltd (ii) contractors working for HS2 Ltd; and
the dates on which they were obtained.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The permissions to undertake the work in question cover the following:
Land
HS2 Ltd’s contractors will initially undertake the vegetation clearance work using
access rights granted under Schedule 2 of the High Speed Rail (London to West
Midlands) Act 2017 (“the HS2 Act”).
This involves engaging with the landowners to discuss minimising the impact of the
work.
The required land will be acquired under Schedule 16 of the HS2 Act 2017, notices of
which are imminent to the landowners.
Ecology & Environment
The vegetation clearance proposed will be undertaken in accordance with the
following ecological consents and licences:
The HS2 Act HS2 Organisational European Protected Species Licence for Great
Crested Newt WML025. First issued March 2017.
HS2 Organisational European Protected Species Licence for Badger WML024. First
issued February 2018.
Highway Authority
HS2 Ltd is in the process of producing applications under schedule 4 of the HS2 Act
which detail the highway traffic management that it plans to implement to undertake
the works. These are subject to approval by the local highway authority.
Network Rail
The Asset Protection Agreement Brief, required under the Framework Asset
Protection Agreement with Network Rail, is in place, under which the possessions are
currently being requested. As part of its commitment to keep communities informed of
works that may affect them, HS2 Ltd also issued an Advance Works Notification to
people within the vicinity of the area to be cleared, advising them of the planned work
and how it may affect the local community. This was issued in early February 2019.
High Speed Two: Staff
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [222800]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many HS2 Ltd staff are working
exclusively on mitigating the environmental effect caused by HS2 Ltd.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
HS2 Ltd takes its environmental responsibilities seriously and seeks to reduce its
environmental impacts across all staff and project disciplines. There are currently 82
HS2 Ltd staff working exclusively on mitigating the environmental effects of HS2. This
includes individuals that are embedded within the organisation via HS2 Ltd’s
development partner. These staff cover all project phases (Phases 1 and 2).
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [222803]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many HS2 Ltd staff left the company in
each month of the last two years; and what the total number of staff on the payroll was in
each of those months.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
Information on the Number of HS2 Ltd staff who left the company and the headcount
for each month in the last two years is set out in the table below.
ALL PAYROLLED STAFF 1
Month Headcount Leavers
Jan-2017 1053 13
Feb-2017 1058 21
Mar-2017 1054 37
Apr-2017 1085 14
May-2017 1091 11
Jun-2017 1090 16
Jul-2017 1086 18
Aug-2017 1076 17
Sep-2017 1106 28
Oct-2017 1120 11
Nov-2017 1123 14
Dec-2017 1130 12
Jan-2018 1156 11
ALL PAYROLLED STAFF 1
Feb-2018 1181 13
Mar-2018 1193 18
Apr-2018 1217 17
May-2018 1216 16
Jun-2018 1237 12
Jul-2018 1256 7
Aug-2018 1254 21
Sep-2018 1261 18
Oct-2018 1271 17
Nov-2018 1265 25
Dec-2018 1261 19
1) Figures include HS2 Permanent staff, HS2 Fixed Term Contract staff, Graduates
and Apprenticeships and therefore the data includes staff with fixed term or
temporary contracts which have a natural end date.
Midland Main Railway Line: Electrification
Neil O'Brien: [222764]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will extend the electrification of the
Midland Main line to Market Harborough.
Andrew Jones:
Network Rail has been instructed to design an extension of electrification
infrastructure from Kettering to Market Harborough station, as part of the Midland
Main Line enhancements programme.
The Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) extension to Market Harborough will enable a
new connection to a power supply at Braybrooke. At Outline Business Case stage in
March 2018 this was determined to be the best value for money option for making the
power supply connection. In line with normal practice, this will be tested again when
the overall Midland Main Line programme Key Output 1a, of which Market
Harborough electrification is a constituent part, is assessed at Full Business Case
stage.
National College for High Speed Rail
Dame Cheryl Gillan: [222670]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the costs to the public purse have been
for establishing the National College for High Speed Rail at (a) Doncaster and (b)
Birmingham; how many staff are employed at each of those locations; how much has
been spent on (i) salary and (ii) expenses costs for those staff; and what the annual
running costs have been at each of those locations in the last 12 months for which
information is available.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
Capital funding of £33.3m was provided by the Department for Business Innovation &
Skills to Birmingham City Council as Accountable Body towards capital costs
associated with the establishment of The National College for High Speed Rail. The
monies were paid between financial years 15-16 and 17-18.
In addition to this, £6m contributions were payable by the Greater Birmingham and
Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership and the Sheffield City Region Combined
Authority (formally known as the Barnsley, Doncaster, Rotherham, and Sheffield
Combined Authority). The land at each site was donated by Birmingham City Council
and Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council.
The College received a working capital loan from the Department for Education of
£8.3m to fund its start-up, £4,710k being paid in March 2017 and £3,590k in January
2018. It also received a loan of £2,770k from HS2 Ltd, paid in March 2017. Interest is
applicable on the loans at standard treasury rates.
A revenue grant of £4.55m is payable by the Department for Education between
January 2019 and July 2020. £2m was paid January 2019, £1.75m becomes payable
in June 2019 and £0.8m will be paid in June 2020.
Staffing
A total of 64 staff are employed at the National College for High Speed Rail, with 22
based in Doncaster and 42 in Birmingham.
Staffing costs per year:
Salary costs 2015/16 – £278k
Salary costs 2016/17 – £1,683k
Salary costs 2017/18 – £2,578k
Salary costs August 2018 to January 2019 - £1,390k
Expenses are included in the amounts above
Running/ premises costs
Annual running costs for the last 12 months where information is available – 12
months to July 2018: Total premises costs £874k of which Birmingham costs were
£444k and Doncaster £430k.
Network Rail: Expenditure
Sir John Hayes: [222772]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much Network Rail spent on (a)
management, (b) publicity and public relations, (c) marketing and (d) recruitment in each
of the last three years.
Andrew Jones:
Network Rail’s expenditure on management, publicity and public relations, and
marketing, is listed below.
MANAGEMENT (£M)
PUBLICITY AND PUBLIC
RELATIONS (£M) MARKETING (£M)
FY17/18 762.0 9.7 1.5
FY16/17 687.0 6.0 1.5
FY15/16 654.0 9.5 1.3
Network Rail expenditure on publicity and public relations is limited to the promotion
of safety and public awareness campaigns.
Network Rail does not hold central records on recruitment costs.
TREASURY
Asset Protection Agency
Martin Whitfield: [224359]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will publish the (a) focused assets covered
under the Asset Protection Agency and (b) focused assets underwritten by the Asset
Protection Agency that were transferred to West Register between 2009 and 2012.
John Glen:
The Asset Protection Agency (APA) was set up in 2009 to manage the Asset
Protection Scheme (APS), with the objective of maintaining financial stability and
protecting taxpayers’ interests by helping participating banks manage their exposure
to high-risk assets.
The 2009-10 APA Annual Reports and Accounts state that the APS initially provided
protection on £282bn worth of assets on the consolidated balance sheet of the Royal
Bank of Scotland Group plc. The detail of these assets is commercially sensitive. The
Annual Report can be found here:
https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130129110533/http://www.hm-
treasury.gov.uk/apa.htm
To develop a more streamlined and better focused monitoring process for these
assets, in 2011 and 2012 the APA stopped reviewing certain low risk assets and
instead focused on a number of larger, high risk assets, known as the “Focus List”.
Further information on the make-up of the Focus List can be found at
http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2012-0368/DEP2012-0368.pdf
and at
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/229293/0120.pdf.
Further detail on the assets underwritten by the APA, including the assets that were
transferred to West Register, an RBS subsidiary, between 2009 and 2012, is
commercially sensitive information in relation to RBS’ customers.
Child Benefit
Angela Crawley: [223194]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 15 February 2019 to
Question 220289, Children: Maintenance, if she will provide further information on the
overall care test used to determine entitlement to child benefit.
Elizabeth Truss:
Child Benefit is payable where a claimant is responsible for a child under the age of
16, or a qualifying young person up to the age of 20 in full-time non-advanced
education or approved training. A person is treated as being responsible for a child in
any week where:
(i) they have the child living with them in that week; or
(ii) they are contributing to the upkeep of the child at a weekly rate not less than the
amount of Child Benefit payable for that week.
Only one person can get Child Benefit in respect of a child. In cases of shared care,
where more than one person meets the entitlement criteria and makes a claim for
Child Benefit, priority rules apply. These rules are set out in the Child Benefit
Technical Manual at the following link.
www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/child-benefit-technical-manual/cbtm08001
Equitable Life Assurance Society: Compensation
Mr Robert Goodwill: [223227]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he has plans to allocate additional
funding to the Equitable Life payment victims.
John Glen:
There are no plans to review the funding allocation made to the Equitable Life
Payment Scheme. Since 2010, we have taken more action than any previous
government to resolve this issue by allocating up to £1.5bn, tax free, for payment to
affected policyholders.
Foreign Investment in UK
Adam Afriyie: [223496]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent steps he has taken to increase the
level of Foreign Direct Investment into the UK.
Robert Jenrick:
Since 2010 we have significantly lowered the headline rate of Corporation Tax from
28% down to 19% today – the lowest in the G20, with further cuts to 17% legislated
by 2020.
We have also created a world-leading offer on creative sector tax reliefs, given
significant support for R&D investment through the tax system, and introduced the
Patent Box regime to attract international investment in intellectual property to the
UK.
These steps have helped to create a highly competitive and FDI-friendly business
environment.
Government Departments: Procurement
Anneliese Dodds: [224367]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many suppliers have been excluded from
bidding for contracts as a result of not complying with the criteria set out in the guidance
entitled, Procurement policy note 03/14: promoting tax compliance, in each year since
2014.
Robert Jenrick:
The information is not held centrally.
Homelessness: Finance
Liam Byrne: [224477]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make it his policy to classify as a
priority in the next Spending Review, funding to reduce rough sleeping and
homelessness.
Elizabeth Truss:
The government is committed to tackling homelessness and rough sleeping. We
have provided £1.2bn of funding to address homelessness. In August, we announced
a £100m Rough Sleeping Strategy to begin progress to meet the commitment to
halve rough sleeping by 2022, and eliminate it by 2027.
All long-term decisions on public spending will be taken at the Spending Review this
year, when the Chancellor will set out his approach for the future.
Investment: Fraud
Dr David Drew: [223247]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government plans to introduce
measures to require banks to reimburse people who have been misled by fraudulent
investment schemes.
John Glen:
The Government takes the issue of investment fraud very seriously and is committed
to protecting people and pursuing those who perpetuate scams wherever possible. In
the area of pension scams in particular, the Government introduced regulations to
ban pensions cold calling which came into force in early January 2019. Firms who
break the rules could face penalties of up to half a million pounds.
If fraudulent investments were recommended by an authorised financial advisor, the
consumer can seek redress by the advisor’s firm by bringing the case to the Financial
Ombudsman Service (FOS).
In the event that the authorised financial adviser is responsible or a UK authorised
collective investment scheme fails, consumers also have access to Financial
Services Compensation Scheme protection. The FSCS provides compensation to
customers of financial services firms that have failed. Since 2011 the FSCS has paid
over £60 million to claimants.
Royal Bank of Scotland
Frank Field: [222650]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment he has made of the
potential merits of maintaining majority ownership of Royal Bank of Scotland.
John Glen:
The Government believes that, as a matter of principle, firms best succeed under
private ownership. Returning RBS to the private sector is the right policy for
taxpayers, customers, and the wider economy.
The Government intervened in RBS to maintain stability at the height of the financial
crisis. RBS was never a speculative investment made to generate a profit, and it is
right that private investors, not taxpayers, should bear the risk of companies such as
RBS.
The Government’s policy remains to return the financial sector assets acquired during
the crisis to private ownership, when it represents value for money to do so, and
market conditions allow.
WOMEN AND EQUALITIES
Political Parties: Equality
Faisal Rashid: [222794]
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, if the Government will bring into force
section 106 of the Equality Act 2010 so that political parties would be required to publish
diversity data on candidates standing in elections.
Victoria Atkins:
We keep section 106 under review, as we do with other uncommenced provisions in
the Equality Act 2010.
The Government Equalities Office is working to support women and disabled people
to participate in politics. This includes the recently announced fund to support
disabled candidates to seek electoral office, to meet the costs of campaigning,
primarily for the forthcoming English local elections in 2019.
Ultimately, parties are responsible for their candidate selection and should lead the
way in improving diverse representation. Many are already doing so.
WORK AND PENSIONS
Children: Day Care
Bridget Phillipson: [224322]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether her Department plans to
use the data it will hold on family circumstances through universal credit to provide more
tailored support to parents in England on the types of childcare available to them.
Justin Tomlinson:
Universal Credit provides an unprecedented level of personalised support, which is
tailored and managed through Work Coaches. Unlike the legacy system Universal
Credit Work Coaches know each person’s case and have more tools than ever
before to help people prepare for work and get a job.
The Universal Credit childcare costs policy aligns with the wider government
childcare offer, which includes free childcare hours and tax free childcare. We are
removing barriers to work by ensuring the childcare offers available eases the
financial burden for parents.
In Universal Credit, we test and adapt the service as we go along, to ensure support
is tailored accordingly for each individual, including parents. We have recently
undertaken a series of nation roadshows for operational colleagues to promote both
the childcare costs offer under Universal Credit and the wider government’s childcare
offer. We continue to work with other government departments to ensure parents
have the information they need to make the best childcare choice for their family.
Children: Maintenance
Martin Whitfield: [224360]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reason (a) child
maintenance payments are allocated first to (i) enforcement charges and (ii) debt and
then to children and (b) there is no provision to retrieve payments which have been
allocated incorrectly by the system or manually.
Justin Tomlinson:
(a)The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) does not prioritise the collection of
enforcement charges over on-going maintenance and arrears. Only when all the
money due to children, along with any associated collection fees, has been collected,
will the CMS collect the remaining charges associated with the case, including
enforcement charges. The only exception would be where an enforcement charge
forms part of a liability order, which would be collected alongside the other debt
associated with that order.
(b)The system does have the Manual Allocation capability, which enables a
caseworker to allocate money received across any outstanding liability on a case
Food Banks
Frank Field: [224299]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether her Department has made
an assessment of the geographic coverage of food banks throughout the UK.
Justin Tomlinson:
The Department has not made any assessment of the geographical coverage of food
banks in the UK. Details of the geographical locations of food banks in the Trussell
Trust network can be accessed through the following link:-
https://www.trusselltrust.org/get-help/find-a-foodbank/
The Independent Food Aid Network is currently undertaking an exercise to map
independent food banks, details of which can be accessed through the following link:-
http://www.foodaidnetwork.org.uk/mapping
Unemployment: Ethnic Groups
Seema Malhotra: [224336]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps she is taking to tackle
the comparatively high rates of unemployment among adults from (a) Black and (b)
Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic groups in each (i) region and (ii) nation of the UK.
Alok Sharma:
In 2015 the Government made a commitment to increase the level of ethnic minority
employment by 20% by 2020. Since then, 556,000 more people from ethnic minority
backgrounds are in employment, a 17% increase. The Black/African/Caribbean
unemployment rate of 8.4% is the lowest it has been since this series began in 2001
as is the Pakistani and Bangladeshi unemployment rate of 7.7%.
We know there is more to do following the Race Disparity Audit in 2017 which
revealed a gap in employment rates between ethnic minority groups and the overall
population. The Department has been addressing this by maximising the
effectiveness of our jobcentres and influencing the behaviour of employers in
supporting ethnic minority jobseekers into employment.
For example, the Department identified 20 challenge areas across Great Britain to
work with that have a large gap between ethnic minority and white employment rates.
We have delivered mentoring circles in all 20 challenge areas which involve national
employers offering specialised support to unemployed, ethnic minority jobseekers to
help build their confidence and raise their aspirations. In January 2019, I announced
that these mentoring circles will now be rolled out nationally from April 2019.
We also know from the Race Disparity Audit that gender matters, even more so for
the Pakistani and Bangladeshi group, where employment rates for females is less
than half of White groups. To help overcome this barrier, in September we started
trialling a programme with Pakistani and Bangladeshi women in Birmingham. The
women participated in workshops to explore the benefits of becoming work ready and
the financial incentives for their families in taking up paid employment. We will use
this learning to help determine how we can deliver similar programmes across the
Jobcentre network in 2019.
[ Figures are all based on averages from January 2018 – December 2018 (Labour
Force Survey, ONS) for the UK.]
Universal Credit
Stephen Timms: [224472]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the evidential basis is for her
oral contribution of 11 February 2018, Official Report, column 594, that food bank use
had increased in the initial roll-out of Universal Credit because people had difficulty in
accessing money on time; and if she will make a statement.
Justin Tomlinson:
The proportion of new claims to Universal Credit Full Service receiving full payment
on time in January 2017 was 55%. Since then Waiting Days have been abolished,
advances increased from 50% to 100% and a two week run on of housing benefit
was introduced. Latest figures for full payment on time in the first assessment period
for November 2018 show an increase to 86% from the 55% recorded in January
2017.
Between 2017 and 2018, the number of people making a claim to Universal Credit
rose by 132%. Trussell Trust data for the same period shows an increase in the
number of foodbank parcels issued to Universal Credit claimants of 90%. So while
there may have been difficulties in early 2017, what we may be observing now is a
substitution effect as legacy claims are replaced by Universal Credit claims, rather
than an increase directly attributing to Universal Credit.
Universal Credit: Disqualification
Frank Field: [223197]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what records her Department holds
on the income of the 4.9 per cent of claimants who were not in receipt of any tracked
benefits in the 180 days following a universal credit live service sanction decision.
Alok Sharma:
The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur
disproportionate cost.
WRITTEN STATEMENTS
CABINET OFFICE
EU Exit Update
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office (Mr
David Lidington): [HCWS1361]
On 14 February 2019, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Exiting the
European Union, the Honourable Member for Daventry, made a commitment in the
House that I would meet with the Right Honourable Member for Broxtowe on behalf of the
Government, to identify information to be published relating to the implications for trade
and business of a no-deal exit from the European Union on 29 March 2019.
These discussions have now taken place. In light of these discussions, I am depositing in
the Libraries of both Houses the following document: Implications for Trade and Business
of a No Deal Exit from the European Union on 29 March.
This document summarises Government activity to prepare for no deal as a contingency
plan, and provides an assessment of the implications of a no deal exit for trade and
businesses, given the preparations that have been made.
The Government’s primary aim remains to ensure that the UK leaves the EU on 29 March
with a negotiated deal which will honour the result of the referendum. However, as a
responsible government, it continues to plan for all eventualities. Guidance for
businesses and citizens on how to prepare for a no deal scenario can be found on the
Government’s Exit guidance website, www.gov.uk/government/brexit.
FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE
Entering into force of the Prespa Agreement and North Macedonia’s NATO
Accession
The Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Sir Alan Duncan):
[HCWS1360]
Her Majesty’s Government has received by Note Verbale a formal notice from the
government in Skopje that the Republic of Macedonia has changed its name to the
Republic of North Macedonia. This follows the entering into force of the Prespa
Agreement. The UK body that deals with geographical names, the Permanent Committee
on Geographical Names (PCGN), recommended that we endorse the change. My Right
Honourable Friend, the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs agreed.
The Name Issue
The Name Issue had been a matter of dispute between Macedonia and Greece since
1991, when Greece refused to recognise the new state as the ‘Republic of Macedonia’
owing to sensitivities over use of the term Macedonia. The Republic of Macedonia
became the 181st member of the United Nations, but under the provisional term, the
‘former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’. Until the Prespa Agreement came into force,
this was the designation used by the country in all international fora. In bilateral
communications, the United Kingdom referred to the country by its constitutional name,
the ‘Republic of Macedonia’.
The Prespa Agreement
Under the auspices of the United Nations, negotiating teams from both countries reached
a settlement. The foreign ministers of Greece and Macedonia signed the Prespa
Agreement on 17 June 2018. The entering into force of the Prespa Agreement earlier this
month resolves the dispute. Under Article 1 (3) of the Agreement, the Republic of
Macedonia is henceforth the Republic of North Macedonia.
NATO Accession
NATO Allies, including the United Kingdom, signed North Macedonia’s Accession
Protocol on 6 February. Greece’s parliament ratified North Macedonia’s NATO Accession
Protocol on 8 February. The Greek government then confirmed to the Macedonian
Government that all necessary steps to ratify the Prespa Agreement were complete. Her
Majesty’s Government is taking forward the process for UK ratification of North
Macedonia’s NATO Accession Protocol. This will involve laying the Accession Protocol
before Parliament for 21 sitting days for scrutiny (as stipulated in the Constitutional
Reform and Governance Act 2010). Once this process is complete, and provided
Parliament has no objections, Her Majesty’s Government will deposit its instrument of
ratification.