DAFTAR PUSTAKA - Diponegoro University | Institutional...
Transcript of DAFTAR PUSTAKA - Diponegoro University | Institutional...
58
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Morgan, G Edward, S Mikhail. Clinical Anesthesiology. New York: MC
Graw Hill; 2006.
2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Pain Prevalence After Major Craniotomy. C2013
[updated 2013 Jan 13; cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01502540
3. Wood Sharon. Anatomy and Physiology of Pain. C2008 [updated 2008
Sep 18; cited 2014 Jan 31] Available from: http://www.nursingtimes.net
/nursing-practice/clinical-zones/pain-management/anatomy-and
physiology-of-pain/1860931
4. Thibault M, Girard F, Moumdjian R, et al. Craniotomy site influences
postoperative pain following neurosurgical procedures: a retrospective
study. Can J Anaesth [Internet] . 2007 [cited: 2013 Nov 30]; 54(7): 544-
548. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17602040
5. Hyo-Seok Na, Sang-Bum An,
Hee-Pyoung Park, et al. Intravenous Patient-
Controlled Analgesia to Manage the Postoperative Pain in Patients
Undergoing Craniotomy. Korean J Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2011[cited:
2013 Nov 30]; 60(1): 30-35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040429/
6. Soenarjo. Anestesiologi. Semarang: Perdatin; 2002.
7. Maund E, Mcdaid C, Rice S, et al. Paracetamol And Selective And Non-
Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs For The Reduction In Morphine-
Related Side Effects After Major Surgery: A Systematyic Review. British
Journal Of Anesthesia [Internet].2011 [cited 2013 Nov 30]; 106(3): 292-
297. Available from: http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon1417.pdf
8. Chouduri AH, Uppal R. A Comparison Between Intravenous Paracetamol
plus Fentanyl and Intravenous Fentanyl Alone for Postoperative Analgesia
During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Anesthesia Essays and Research
59
[Internet]. 2011 [cited: 2013 Nov 29]; 5(2): 196-200. Available from:
http://www.aeronline.org/article.asp?issn=0259-1162;year=2011;volume
=5;issue=2;spage=196;epage=200;aulast=Choudhuri.
9. Arici S, Gurbet A, Türker G, et al. Preemptif Analgesic Effects of
Intravenous Paracetamol in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. The Journal
of The Turkish Society of Algology[Internet]. 2009[cited 2013 Nov 29];
21(2):54-61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
19562533 .
10. Arslan Mustafa , Bahadır Celep, Ramazan Çiçek, et al. Comparing the
Efficacy of Preemptif Intravenous Paracetamol on the Reducing Effect of
Opioid Usage in Cholecystectomy. Journal of Research in Medical
Sciences[Internet]. 2013[cited 2013 Nov 29]; 18(3): 172–177.Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3732894/
11. E Verchère, Grenier B, Mesli A, et al. Postoperative Pain Management
After Supratentorial Craniotomy. Journal of Neurosurgical
Anesthesiology[Internet]. 2002[cited 2013 Nov 29]. ;14(2):96-101.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11907388
12. IA, Savvina. Preemptif Analgesia with Paracetamol in Pediatric
Neurosurgical Patients. Anesteziol Reanimatol[Internet]. 2010[cited 2013
Nov 29]; 1:4-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
20568329
13. CJ, Woolf. Pain: moving from symptom control towards mechanism-
specific pharmacologic management. Annals of Internal Medicine
[Internet]. 2004 [cited 2014 Jan 2]; 140(6):441. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15023710
14. Schulte Fried , Andreas Filis, Nikolaos Karageorgos, et al. Pain After
Craniotomy-Really a Problem?. Arch Medical Science [Internet]. 2010
[cited 2014 Jan 2]; 6(6): 827-828. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302690/
60
15. Steeds, Charlotte E. Anatomy and Physiology of Pain. Surgery [Internet].
2009 [cited 2014 Jan 2]; 27(12): 507-511. Available from:
http://www.surgeryjournal.co.uk/article/S0263-9319%2809%2900253-
1/abstract
16. Wuhrman Elsa, Maureen F, Cooney, et al. Acute Pain: Assessment and
Treatment. Topics in Advanced Practice Nursing Ejournal[Internet].
2011[cited 2014 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/
viewarticle/735034_3
17. NB Patel. Physiology of Pain. In: Guide to Pain Management in Low
Resources Setting. IASP 2010.[cited 2014 Jan 2]; 13-7. Available from:
https://www.uonbi.ac.ke/npatel/files/chapter_3_physiology_of_pain_.pdf
18. GG Graham, Scott KF. Mechanism of Action of Paracetamol. Am J
Ther [Internet]. 2005[cited 2014 jan 30]; 12(1): 46-55. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15662292
19. MP Jensen, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of Visual Analog Scale
Ratings and Change Scores: a Reanalysis of Two Clinical Trials of
Postoperative Pain. J Pain [Internet]. 2003.[cited 2014 Jan 30]; 4(7): 407-
414. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14622683
20. De Benedittis G , Lorenzetti A, Migliore M, Spagnoli D, Tiberio F, Villani
RM. Postoperative Pain In Neurosurgery: A Pilot Study In Brain Surgery.
Neurosurgery[Internet].1996.[cited 2014 Jan 2]; 38(3): 469-470. Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8837797
21. De Gray L.C., B.F. Matta. Acute and Chronic Pain Following Craniotomy:
a Review. Anaesthesia[Internet]. 2005. [cited 2014 Jan 2]; 60(7): 693-704.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960721
22. Pubchem Choumpound. Fentanyl. [cited 2014 Jan 31]. Available from:
http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=3345
61
23. Hartono Ruddi, Wiwi Jaya, Djudjuk Rahmad Basuki. Pengaruh Pemberian
Fentanyl 1µg/Kgbb Sebagai Ajuvan pada Bupivacain 0,5% Terhadap
Onset Blok Motorik dan Sensorik Pasie yang Dilakukan Anestesi
Epidural. Jurnal Anestesi Indonesia. 2013.[cited 2014 Jan 2] ;5(1).
Available from: www.janesti.com/journal/view/article/87
24. Tan I. Farmakologi dan Terapi.Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FKUI, 2007.
25. Chahl, Loris A. Opioid-mechanism of action. Australian Prescriber. 1996
[cited 2014 Jan 25]; 19: 63-65.Available from: http://www.
australianprescriber.com/magazine/19/3/63/5
26. Katzung Bertram G. Farmakologi Dasar & Klinik, 10th ed. Jakarta: EGC;
2007.
27. Gupta Anuj, Kirtipal Kaur, Sheeshpal Sharma, Shubham Goyal, Saahil
Arora, R.S.R Murthy. Clinical Aspect of Acute Post-Operative Pain
Management & Its Assesment. Journal of Advance Pharmacology
Technology and Research. 2010.[cited 2014 Jan 2]; 1(2): 102. Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255434/
28. Viscusi, Eugene R. IV Acetaminophen Improves Pain Management and
Reduces Opioid Requirements in Surgical Patients: A review of the
clinical Data and Case-based Presentation. Anesthesiology News. 2012.
[cited 2014 Jan 20]; Available from : http://www. painmedicinenews.com
/download/SR122_WM.pdf
29. DE, Feierman. The effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on fentanyl
metabolism in vitro. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000.[cited 2014 Jan 29];
44(5):560-563. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
10786743
30. DJ Kehlet H. Anesthesia for Caesarean Delivery. Anesth Anelg. 1993.
[cited 2014 Jan 30]; 77:1048-1056. Available from: http://
www.medscape.org/viewarticle/581948
62
31. William. Effect of Intravenous Parecoxib on Post-craniotomy Pain. Br J
Anaesth. 2011. [cited 2014 June 14]; 107(3):398-403. Available from: http
://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21841050
32. C, Edward. Pain Management After Craniotomy. Best Practice &
Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2007. [cited 2014 June 15]; 21(4):557-
73. Available from: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1521689607000614/1-s2.0-
S1521689607000614-main.pdf
33. SY, Rahimi. Postoperative Pain Management with Tramadol After
Craniotomy: Evaluation and Cost Analysis. 2010.[cited 2014 June 15];
112(2):268-72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/
19630495
63
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Informed consent
JUDUL PENELITIAN : Pengaruh Pemberian Parasetamol 1000 MG
Intravena Perioperatif Terhadap Penggunaan
Fentanyl pada Pasien Kraniotomi di RSUP Dr.
Kariadi Semarang
INSTANSI PELAKSANA : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro
PENELITI : Irma Amalia
Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan
(INFORMED CONSENT)
Berikut ini naskah yang akan dibacakan pada Responden / Ibu Responden
Penelitian :
(a.I. berisi penjelasan apa yang akan dialami oleh responden diwawancarai)
Yth Bapak/Ibu :
Peneliti yang tersebut diatas adalah Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Diponegoro yang bermaksud ingin menggunakan data rekam medik dalam
peneitian ini dengan tujuan mengetahui pengaruh pemberianm parasetamol 1000
mg intravena perioperatif terhadap penggunaan fentanyl pada pasien kraniotomi
di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. Peneliti akan mengambil data identitas,
kebutuhan fentanyl yang diperlukan selama operasi, skor visual analog scale,
serta kejadian mual muntah yang terjadi pada pasien tersebut. Peneliti menjamin
kerahasiaan identitas dan informasi yang diberikan. Informasi tersebut hanya
digunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian. Bapak/ Ibu berhak menolak dan
keluardari penelitian sesuai dengan keinginan.
Terima kasih atas kerjasama Bapak/Ibu/Sdr.
64
Setelah mendengar dan memahami penjelasan penelitian, dengan ini saya
menyatakan
SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU
Untuk ikut sebagai responden / sampel penelitian.
Semarang,………………..... 2014
Saksi : Nama Terang :
Nama Terang : Alamat :
Alamat :
65
Lampiran 2. Ethical clearance
66
Lampiran 3. Surat ijin penelitian
67
Lampiran 4. Laporan Tindakan Anestesi
68
69
Lampiran 6. Lembar Evaluasi
70
71
Lampiran 6. Data SPSS
Crosstabs
Jenis kelamin * Kelompok Crosstabulation
7 6 13
6.5 6.5 13.0
35.0% 30.0% 32.5%
17.5% 15.0% 32.5%
13 14 27
13.5 13.5 27.0
65.0% 70.0% 67.5%
32.5% 35.0% 67.5%
20 20 40
20.0 20.0 40.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Laki-laki
Perempuan
Jenis kelamin
Total
Kontrol Perlakuan
Kelompok
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.114b 1 .736
.000 1 1.000
.114 1 .736
1.000 .500
.111 1 .739
40
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
50.
b.
72
Umur
Case Summaries
Umur
20 38.90 12.208 35.00 18 57
20 43.20 12.792 44.50 15 72
40 41.05 12.533 41.00 15 72
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
N Mean Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum
Tests of Normality
.156 20 .200* .924 20 .120
.113 20 .200* .980 20 .931
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Umur
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true significance.*.
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
Um
ur
80
60
40
20
25
35
73
T-Test
Group Statistics
20 38.90 12.208 2.730
20 43.20 12.792 2.860
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Umur
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.227
.636
-1.088 -1.088
38 37.917
.284 .284
-4.300 -4.300
3.954 3.954
-12.304 -12.305
3.704 3.705
F
Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
Lower
Upper
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
t-test for Equality of
Means
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Umur
74
Lama operasi
Case Summaries
Lama operasi
20 279.00 75.457 285.00 150 420
20 300.00 97.939 300.00 165 480
40 289.50 86.948 300.00 150 480
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
N Mean Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum
Tests of Normality
.158 20 .200* .940 20 .236
.180 20 .089 .919 20 .095
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Lama operasi
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true significance.*.
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
La
ma
op
era
si
500
400
300
200
100
75
T-Test
Group Statistics
20 279.00 75.457 16.873
20 300.00 97.939 21.900
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Lama operasi
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
2.396
.130
-.760 -.760
38 35.679
.452 .452
-21.000 -21.000
27.646 27.646
-76.966 -77.086
34.966 35.086
F
Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
Lower
Upper
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
t-test for Equality of
Means
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Lama operasi
76
Kelompok
Case Summaries
20 20
2.50 1.90
1.051 .553
2.00 2.00
1 1
4 3
20 20
1.25 1.00
1.372 .973
1.00 1.00
0 0
4 3
40 40
1.88 1.45
1.362 .904
2.00 2.00
0 0
4 3
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
VAS.1 VAS.24
Tests of Normality
.283 20 .000 .845 20 .004
.269 20 .001 .815 20 .001
.372 20 .000 .728 20 .000
.250 20 .002 .839 20 .003
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kontrol
Perlakuan
VAS.1
VAS.24
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
77
VAS.1
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
VA
S.1
4
3
2
1
0
VAS.24
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
VA
S.2
4
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
11
16
1
3
4
10
78
Kontrol
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
9a 6.94 62.50
3b 5.17 15.50
8c
20
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ties
Total
VAS.24 - VAS.1
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
VAS.24 < VAS.1a.
VAS.24 > VAS.1b.
VAS.24 = VAS.1c.
Test Statisticsb
-1.877a
.061
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
VAS.24 -
VAS.1
Based on positive ranks.a.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Testb.
79
Perlakuan
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
6a 6.17 37.00
4b 4.50 18.00
10c
20
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ties
Total
VAS.24 - VAS.1
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
VAS.24 < VAS.1a.
VAS.24 > VAS.1b.
VAS.24 = VAS.1c.
Test Statisticsb
-1.026a
.305
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
VAS.24 -
VAS.1
Based on positive ranks.a.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Testb.
80
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
20 25.68 513.50
20 15.33 306.50
40
20 26.15 523.00
20 14.85 297.00
40
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
VAS.1
VAS.24
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsb
96.500 87.000
306.500 297.000
-2.906 -3.239
.004 .001
.004a
.002a
Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed
Sig.)]
VAS.1 VAS.24
Not corrected for ties.a.
Grouping Variable: Kelompokb.
81
Kelompok
Case Summaries
Delta VAS
20 -.60 1.314 .00 -3 2
20 -.25 1.020 .00 -3 1
40 -.43 1.174 .00 -3 2
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
N Mean Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum
Tests of Normality
.226 20 .009 .930 20 .155
.297 20 .000 .847 20 .005
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Delta VAS
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
Delta VAS
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
Delt
a V
AS
2
1
0
-1
-2
-327
82
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
20 18.78 375.50
20 22.23 444.50
40
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
Delta VAS
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsb
165.500
375.500
-.986
.324
.355a
Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed
Sig.)]
Delta VAS
Not corrected for ties.a.
Grouping Variable: Kelompokb.
Fentanyl
Case Summaries
Fentanyl
20 201.25 67.119 200.00 100 350
20 185.00 96.108 175.00 100 400
40 193.13 82.234 200.00 100 400
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
N Mean Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum
Tests of Normality
.207 20 .024 .926 20 .129
.212 20 .019 .821 20 .002
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Fentanyl
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
83
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
Fe
nta
ny
l400
350
300
250
200
150
100
84
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
20 22.45 449.00
20 18.55 371.00
40
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
Fentanyl
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsb
161.000
371.000
-1.087
.277
.301a
Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed
Sig.)]
Fentanyl
Not corrected for ties.a.
Grouping Variable: Kelompokb.
85
Mual muntah
Case Summaries
Mual muntah
20 .30 .657 .00 0 2
20 .00 .000 .00 0 0
40 .15 .483 .00 0 2
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
N Mean Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum
Tests of Normalityb
.476 20 .000 .515 20 .000
Kelompok
KontrolMual muntah
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
Mual muntah is constant when Kelompok = Perlakuan. It has been omitted.b.
Kelompok
PerlakuanKontrol
Mu
al m
un
tah
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2
16
67
86
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
20 22.50 450.00
20 18.50 370.00
40
Kelompok
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
Mual muntah
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsb
160.000
370.000
-2.079
.038
.289a
Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed
Sig.)]
Mual muntah
Not corrected for ties.a.
Grouping Variable: Kelompokb.
87
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi
88
Lampiran 8. Biodata mahasiswa
BIODATA MAHASISWA
Nama : Irma Amalia
NIM : 22010110120005
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Jakarta 14 Januari 1993
Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan
Alamat : Jl. Cipinang Jaya GG No. 12 C Jakarta
Nomor Telepon : 082133353592
e-mail : [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD : SD BPS&K III Lulus tahun: 2004
2. SMP : SMP N 52 Jakarta Lulus tahun: 2007
3. SMA : SMA N 54 Jakarta Lulus tahun: 2010
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun: 2010