d65025l
Transcript of d65025l
![Page 1: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NEC ELECTRONICS INC.
July 1999TRQ-99-07-330
QUARTERLY ASIC
RELIABILITY REPORTThis report contains reliability data on the following
Application-Specific Integrated Circuit familiesassembled by NEC Electronics Inc. in Roseville, California
(fabricated by NEC Japan or NEC Electronics Roseville as specified).
BiCMOS-4 CMOS-5 CB-C9
CMOS-3 CMOS-6 CB-C9VX/VM
CMOS-4 CMOS-6A UC-II
Prepared & Checked by: Approved by:
Signature on file Signature on file B. Howell K. MuranakaNEC Electronics Inc. NEC Electronics Inc.R&QC Department R&QC Department
Please refer all inquiries to:NEC Electronics Inc.
Reliability and Quality Control Department7501 Foothills Boulevard
Roseville, CA 95747Tel: (916) 786-3900
The information in this document is subject to change without notice. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced in any form orby any means without the prior written consent of NEC Corporation. NEC Corporation assumes no responsibility for any errors that mayappear in this document. NEC Corporation does not assume any liability for infringement of patents, copyrights, or other intellectualproperty rights of third parties by or arising from use of a device described herein or any other liability arising from use of such device. Nolicense, either express, implied, or otherwise, is granted under any patents, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights of NECCorporation or others. While NEC Corporation has been making a continuous effort to enhance the reliability of its semiconductor devices,the possibility of defects cannot be eliminated entirely. To minimize risks of damage or injury to persons or property arising from a defect inan NEC semiconductor device, customers must incorporate sufficient safety measures in its design, such as redundancy, fire-containment,and anti-failure features. NEC devices are classified into the following three quality grades: "Standard," "Special," and "Specific." TheSpecific quality grade applies only to devices developed based on a customer-designated "quality assurance program" for a specificapplication. The recommended applications of a device depend on its quality grade, as indicated below. Customers must check the qualitygrade of each device before using it in a particular application. Standard: Computers, office equipment, communications equipment, testand measurement equipment, audio and visual equipment, home electronic appliances, machine tools, personal electronic equipment, andindustrial robots. Special: Transportation equipment (automobiles, trains, ships, etc.), traffic control systems, anti-disaster systems, anti-crime systems, safety equipment, and medical equipment (not specifically designed for life support). Specific: Aircraft, aerospaceequipment, submersible repeaters, nuclear reactor control systems, and life-support systems or medical equipment for life support, etc.The quality grade of NEC devices is Standard unless otherwise specified in NEC's data sheets or data books. If customers intend to useNEC devices for applications other than those specified for Standard quality grade, they should contact an NEC sales representative inadvance. Anti-radioactive design is not implemented in this product.
![Page 2: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
2
Contents
Page
Failure Rate Prediction Philosophy .............................................................................................. 3
Table 1. Reliability Test Conditions ............................................................................................. 5
Table 2. Pretreatment Conditions for T/H, T/C, and PCT Tests ................................................... 6
Table 3. HTB Life Test Summary and Failure Rate Predictions ........................................................ 7
Table 4. Other Life Test Summaries (HTSL, HHSL, T/H) ................................................................. 12
Table 5. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (T/C, PCT) .............................................. 17
Table 6. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (LI, SD, TS) ............................................ 22
Table 7. Failure Summaries ................................................................................................................. 26
Table 8. CMOS-8L Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data ......................................................... 27
Table 9. CB-C9 Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data .............................................................. 27
Table 10. CB-C9VX/VM Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data ............................................... 28
Table 11. UC-II Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data .............................................................. 28
NEC Electronics Inc. is dedicated to the QCD principle
of providing the highest Quality product at the lowest
possible Cost with on-time Delivery to our customers.
![Page 3: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
3
This report contains reliability test results of ASICproducts subjected to routine Monitor Reliability Testing(MRT) at NEC. The products in this report wereassembled in Roseville and fabricated in either Rosevilleor Japan as specified. They are all representative ofNEC's manufacturing processes for ASIC products. Thisreport also contains failure rate predictions, which werecalculated using the Arrhenius method shown below.
Failure Rate Prediction Philosophy
When predicting the failure rate at a certain temperaturefrom accelerated life test data, various values of activationenergy corresponding to failure mechanisms should beconsidered. This is done whenever exact causes of failuresare known by performing failure analysis. In some cases,however, an average activation energy is assumed in orderto accomplish a quick first-order approximation. In thecase of ASIC devices, NEC assumes an activation energyof 0.5 eV for such approximations. This value has beenassessed from extensive reliability test results and yields aconservative failure rate.
Since most semiconductor failures are temperaturedependent, the Arrhenius relationship is used to normalizefailure rate predictions at a system operation temperatureof 55°C. The Arrhenius model includes the effects oftemperature and activation energy of the failuremechanisms. This model assumes that the degradation of aperformance parameter is linear with time. Thetemperature dependence is taken to be an exponentialfunction that defines the probability of occurrence. TheArrhenius equation for high-temperature stress is given asthe following:
A(T) =-Ea (
1jT -2jT )
k (1jT )(
2jT )e (1)
Where: A(T) ≡ Temperature acceleration factor
Ea ≡ Activation energy
Tj1 ≡ Junction temperature (in K)
at Ta1 = 55°C
Tj2 ≡ Junction temperature (in K) at Ta2 = 125°C
k ≡ Boltzmann's constant = 8.62 x 10-5 eV/K
The temperature contribution of the device's internalpower dissipation is significant enough that it cannot beignored. Therefore, the junction temperatures (Tj1 and Tj2)are used instead of the ambient temperatures (Ta1 and Ta2).If the thermal resistance of the device (junction to ambient)is known, it is possible to calculate the junctiontemperatures as follows:
jT = aT +( ja Pd)θ ⋅ (2)
Where: θja = Thermal resistance
Pd = Power dissipation
With this information, we can therefore calculate atemperature acceleration factor.
Having now predicted the overall acceleration factor forthe high-temperature operating life test, the failure rate canbe predicted at a 60% confidence level using the followingequation:
L =510
2T
χ2 ⋅(3)
Where: L ≡ Failure rate in %/1000 hours
χ2 ≡ The tabular value of chi-squared distribution at a given confidence level and calculated degrees of freedom (n = 2f + 2, where f = number of failures)
T ≡ Number of equivalent device hours = (Number of devices) x (number of test
hours) x (acceleration factor)
Exhibit Table: χ2 value for confidence level of 60% and90%
f 0 1 2 3
n 2 4 6 8
χ2 C.L. = 60% 1.83 4.04 6.21 8.35
C.L. = 90% 4.61 7.78 10.6 13.4
![Page 4: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
4
Exhibit Table: Acceleration factor for different Tj2 / Tj1
with different activation energy
Tj2 (°C)/Tj1 (°C) Acceleration Factor
0.3eV 0.5eV
(Typ)
0.7eV
125/55
125/70
125/80
125/90
125/100
125/110
125/120
6.47
4.07
3.05
2.32
1.80
1.41
1.12
22.5
10.4
6.42
4.08
2.66
1.77
1.20
78.0
26.4
13.5
7.16
3.93
2.22
1.30
150/55
150/70
150/80
150/90
150/100
150/110
150/120
10.8
6.82
5.12
3.90
3.01
2.36
1.87
53.2
24.5
15.2
9.66
6.29
4.19
2.85
261
88.2
45.1
24.0
13.1
7.43
4.33
Another method of expressing failures is as FIT (failures intime). One FIT is equal to one failure in 109 hours. SinceL is already expressed as %/1000 hours (10-5 failure/hr), aneasy conversion from %/1000 hours to FIT would be tomultiply the value of L by 109.
In conclusion, the failure rate of the whole process familyis expressed as follows:
L(FIT)2 109
2 T= ⋅
∑χ
(4)
Where summation ΣT is taken for all reliability testsperformed on the process family.
Note: Some of the estimated FIT rates are higher thanwould be expected due to small sample sizes; however,they are expected to lower as reliability monitor data isaccumulated.
Example
A sample of 960 devices was subjected to 1000 hours of125°C burn-in at 7.0 volts. One reject was observed. Giventhat the acceleration factor was calculated to be 34.6 (usingEquation 1), what is the failure rate, normalized to 55°C,using a confidence level of 60%? Express the failure ratein FIT.
Solution
For n = 2f + 2 = 2(1) + 2 = 4 X 2 = 4.04 (for 60%confidence level). Then,
LX 10
2T
X 10 (% /1000 hrs)
2(total device hrs)(accel factor)
2 5 2 5
= =· ·
= =·(4.04) 10
2(960)(1000)(34.6)0.0061 % /1000 hrs
5
Therefore,
FIT = 0.0061% 10
1000 hrs61
9·=
![Page 5: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
5
Table 1. Reliability Test Conditions
The reliability tests performed by NEC consist of high-temperature bias life (HTB), high-temperature storage life (HTSL), high-humidity storage life (HHSL), and high-temperature, high-humidity life (T/H = HHSL + bias). Additionally, variousenvironmental and mechanical tests are performed. The table below shows the conditions of various life tests, environmentaltests, and mechanical tests.
Test Item SymbolMIL-STD 883C
Method Test Conditions Remarks
High-temperature bias life HTB1
HTB2
1005 TA = 125°C
TA = 150°C
VDD
= VDD max.
Note 1
High-temperature storagelife
HTSL1
HTSL2
HTSL3
HTSL4
1008 TA = 150°C
TA = 175°C
TA = 200°C
TA = 250°C
Note 1
High-temperature/high-humidity bias life
T/H TA = 85°C; RH = 85%;
VDD
= VDD max.
Pretreatment as specified in Table 2, if any.
Note 1
High-humidity storage life HHSL TA = 85°C; RH = 85%
Pretreatment as specified in Table 2, if any.
Note 1
Pressure cooker PCT TA = 125°C; P = 2.3 atm
Pretreatment as specified in Table 2, if any.
Note 1
Temperature cycle T/C 1010 −65°C to 150°C
Pretreatment as specified in Table 2, if any.
Note 1
Lead fatigue LI 2004 90° bends; 3 bends without breaking Note 2
Solderability SD 2003 230°C; 5 sec; rosin base flux Note 3
Soldering heat TS Note 4 260°C; 10 sec; rosin base flux
Temperature cycle 1010 10 cyc; 1 hr/cyc; −65°C to 150°C
Thermal shock 1011 15 cyc; 10 min/cyc; 0°C to 100°C Note 1
Notes: 1. Electrical test per data sheet is performed. Devices that exceed the data sheet limits are considered rejects.2. Broken lead is considered a reject.3. Less than 95% coverage is considered a reject.4. MIL-STD-750A, Method 2031.
![Page 6: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
6
Table 2. Pretreatment Conditions for T/H, T/C, and PCT Tests
Pretreatment Condition
A Infrared Reflow (230°C Peak)
B Vapor Phase Soldering (215°C Peak)
C Temp Humidity Bake (125°C, 4 hrs) + IR
C16 Cycling + Storage + Bake (125°C, 16 hrs) + IR
D (−65°C to 150°C, 20 cyc) (85°C/85% RH, 72 hrs) Bake (125°C, 4 hrs) + VPS
D16 Bake (125°C, 16 hrs) + VPS
E Lead Soldering (260°C, 10 sec)
◊◊!-1 Temp Humidity
Cycling + Bake + Storage +
Infrared Reflow (240°C Peak)
1 time
◊◊!-2 (-65°C to 150°C, (125°C, (30°C/70% RH,
20 cyc) ◊◊ hrs) ! days + 10 hrs)Infrared Reflow (240°C Peak)
2 times
◊◊!-3Infrared Reflow (240°C Peak)
3 times
◊◊ : Bake time! : Storage time:
2 → 58 hours
3 → 82 hours
7 → 178 hours
Example PCT with pretreatment 207–2 = T/C (20 cycles) → Bake (20 hours) → Humidity Storage (178 hours) → IR Reflow (2 times) → PCT
![Page 7: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
7
Table 3. HTB Life Test Summary and Failure Rate Predictions
This table summarizes the reliability test results of processes extensively used by most NEC ASIC products. The failure ratepredictions are based on both 125°C and 150°C high-temperature bias life test results. Failure rate predictions are shown forthe current period of available data and for past periods of cumulative data.
ProcessType
ProcessPeriod
AmbientTemp.
Numberof Devices
Accum.DeviceHours
No. ofFailures(Note 1)
Accel.Factor(Note 2)
Equiv.DeviceHours
Failure Rate55°C and 60%Confidence Level(Note 3)
3A. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D67070GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 89–Jun 97 125°C 88 8.8 x 104 0 47
D67030GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 88–Jun 97 125°C 72 7.2 x 104 0 47
D67010L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 125°C 136 1.36 x 105 0 47
D67010GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 47
BiCMOS Jan 89–Jun 99
(cumulative)
125°C 320 3.20 x 105 0 47 1.5 x 10
7 0.0061%/1000= 61 FIT
3B. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 125°C 236 2.36 x 105 0 49
3C. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 125°C 72 7.20 x 104 0 49
CMOS-3 Jan 89–Jun 99
(cumulative)
125°C 308 3.08 x 105 0 49 1.5 x 10
7 0.0061%/1000= 61 FIT
3D. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 125°C 156 1.56 x 105 0 13.5
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 125°C 198 1.98 x 105 0 13.5
D65024L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 89–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 91–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 89–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 125°C 276 2.76 x 105 0 13.5
D65070L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 125°C 88 8.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 125°C 40 4.0 x 104 0 13.5
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
3E. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65012L(64-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65012GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
![Page 8: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
8
Table 3. HTB Life Test Summary (continued)
ProcessType
ProcessPeriod
AmbientTemp.
Numberof Devices
Accum.DeviceHours
No. ofFailures(Note 1)
Accel.Factor(Note 2)
Equiv.DeviceHours
Failure Rate55°C and 60%Confidence Level(Note 3)
D65013GF(64-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Sep 98 125°C 144 1.44 x 105 0 13.5
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Jun 97 125°C 312 3.12 x 105 0 13.5
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65031L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 96–Mar 98 125°C 72 7.2 x 104 0 13.5
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 93–Jun 98 125°C 168 1.68 x 105 0 13.5
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 98 125°C 120 1.20 x 105 0 13.5
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 91–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 125°C 72 7.1 x 104 2 13.5
D65042GF(64-pin QFP)
Apr 88–Jun 97 125°C 144 1.44 x 105 0 13.5
D65042GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65042GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65070L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 95–Sep 98 125°C 72 9.6 x 104 0 13.5
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun97 125°C 96 9.6 x 104 0 13.5
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Jun 97 125°C 120 1.2 x 105 0 13.5
CMOS-4 Apr 88–Jun 99
(cumulative)
125°C 2462 3.10 x 106 2 13.5 4.19 x 10
7 0.00742%/1000
= 74 FIT
3F. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 90–Jun 97 125°C 168 1.68 x 105 0 13.5
D65044L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 125°C 264 2.64 x 105 0 13.5
D65061GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 125°C 120 1.20 x 105 0 13.5
D65103L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 91–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
3G. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65016GF(80-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 125°C 168 1.68 x 105 0 13.5
D65016GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65025L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 125°C 144 1.44 x 105 0 13.5
D65025GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
![Page 9: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
9
Table 3. HTB Life Test Summary (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
AmbientTemp.
Numberof Devices
Accum.DeviceHours
No. ofFailures
(Note 1)
Accel.Factor(Note 2)
Equiv.DeviceHours
Failure Rate
55°°°°C and 60%Confidence Level(Note 3)
D65025GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 90–Jun 97 125°C 120 1.2 x 105 0 13.5
D65029GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65029GD(120-pin QFP)
Jul 92–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 91–Dec 97 125°C 192 2.16 x 105 0 13.5
D65032GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 97 125°C 240 2.4 x 105 0 13.5
D65044L
(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 94–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65044L
(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 98–Dec 98 125°C 24 4.0 x 103 0 13.5
D65046GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 125°C 245 2.45 x 105 0 13.5
D65046GD(136-pin QFP)
Oct 92–Jun 97 125°C 168 1.68 x 105 0 13.5
D65046GD
(160-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Mar 98 125°C 192 1.92 x 105 0 13.5
D65051GF(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Sep 98 125°C 144 1.44 x 105 0 13.5
D65051GF(160-pin QFP)
Jul 97–Sep 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65061L (68-pin PLCC)
Oct 96–Sep 98 125°C 72 7.2 x 104 0 13.5
D65061GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 125°C 120 1.2 x 105 0 13.5
D65061GD(136-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Jun 97 125°C 240 2.4 x 105 0 13.5
D65062GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65062GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65082GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 13.5
D65103L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 98 125°C 480 5.04 x 105 0 13.5
D65103GD
(160-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65103GD
(80-pin QFP)
Jul 97–Dec 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 13.5
D65180GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 125°C 144 1.44 x 105 0 13.5
CMOS-5 Jan 89–Jun 99(cumulative)
125°C 3677 3.70 x 106 0 13.5 5.00 x 10
7 0.00183%/1000
= 18 FIT
![Page 10: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
10
Table 3. HTB Life Test Summary (continued)
ProcessType
ProcessPeriod
AmbientTemp.
Numberof Devices
Accum.DeviceHours
No. ofFailure(Note 1)
Accel.Factor(Note 2)
Equiv.DeviceHours
Failure Rate55°C and 60%Confidence Level(Note 3)
3H. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65622GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 96–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 22.5
D65632
(100-pin QFP)
Sep 97–Dec 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 22.5
D65640GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 97–Jun 98 125°C 96 1.20 x 105 0 22.5
D65640GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 94–Sep 98 125°C 264 2.64 x 105 0 22.5
D65640GD(120-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Sep 98 125°C 316 3.16 x 105 0 22.5
D65646GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 94–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 22.5
D65646GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 94–Jun 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 22.5
D65650GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 92–Jun 97 125°C 72 7.2 x 104 0 22.5
D65650GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 22.5
D65650GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Sep 97 125°C 384 3.84 x 105 0 22.5
D65654GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 125°C 96 9.6 x 104 0 22.5
D65654GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Dec 98 125°C 264 2.44 x 105 0 22.5
D65658GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Dec 97 125°C 216 2.16 x 105 0 22.5
D65658GD(208-pin QFP)
Apr 95–Jun 98 125°C 120 1.20 x 105 0 22.5
CMOS-6A Nov 90–Jun 99
(cumulative)
125°C 1996 1.99 x 106 0 22.5 4.49 x 10
7 0.00204%/1000
= 20 FIT
3I. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
D65841GJ
(144-pin QFP)
Mar 96–Aug 96 150°C 576 5.76 x 105 0 53.2
3J. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65832GD
(208-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Jun 99 150°C 72 7.2 x 104 0 53.2
CMOS-8L Mar 96–Jun 99
(cumulative)
150°C 648 6.48 x 105 0 53.2 3.45 x 10
7 0.00265%/1000
= 27 FIT
3K. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
TEG 1
(304-pin QFP)
May 97–Sep 97 125°C 24 4.8 x 104 0 22.5
TEG 2
(352-pin TBGA)
May 97–Sep 97 125°C 24 2.4 x 104 0 22.5
![Page 11: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
11
Table 3. HTB Life Test Summary (continued)
ProcessType
ProcessPeriod
AmbientTemp.
Numberof Devices
Accum.DeviceHours
No. ofFailure(Note 1)
Accel.Factor(Note 2)
Equiv.DeviceHours
Failure Rate55°C and 60%Confidence Level(Note 3)
3L. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D82174GD(160-pin QFP)
Oct 98–Dec 98 125°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 22.5
CB-C9 May 97–Jun 99
(cumulative)
125°C 96 1.2 x 105 0 22.5 2.70 x 10
6 Note 4
3M. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
TEG 1
(304-pin QFP)
Apr 98–Jun 98 150°C 47 4.7 x 104 0 53.2
3N. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D82286S1(272-pin PBGA)
Oct 98–Dec 98 150°C 72 7.2 x 104 0 53.2
D82287S1
(272-pin PBGA)
Jan 99–Mar 99 150°C
125°C
112
481.12 x 10
5
4.8 x 104
0
0
53.2
22.5
CB-C9VX/VM Apr 98–Jun 99
(cumulative)
150°C
125°C
231
482.31 x 10
5
4.8 x 104
0 53.2
22.51.34 x 10
7 0.00684%/1000
= 68 FIT
3O. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D83901S1(320-pin PBGA)
Apr 99–Jun 99 150°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 53.2
UC-II Apr 99–Jun 99
(cumulative)
150°C 48 4.8 x 104 0 53.2 2.55 x 10
6 Note 4
Notes: 1. Details of failures are given in Table 7.
2. The acceleration factor was calculated using the Arrhenius mathematical model shown on page 3.
3. FIT was derived from HTB data for all available time periods (devices included in this and all previous ASIC reports issued by NEC Electronics on Japan- and Roseville-made devices).
4. Some of the FIT rates were not calculated due to small sample sizes. In these cases, the FIT rates would not be meaningful. NEC expects a FIT rate of less than 100 for ASIC device types (target not to exceed 150).
![Page 12: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
12
Table 4. Other Life Test Summaries (HTSL, HHSL, T/H)
This table summarizes the reliability test results of the different process types during 150°C storage and 85°C/85% RHstorage and bias tests. The data is summarized for the current period of available data and for past periods of cumulativedata.
Process
Type
Process
Period
HTSL Failures Hours
HHSL Failures Hours
T/H FailuresHours
Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
4A. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D67070GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 89–Jun 97 80 0 0 0 0 - - - 64 0 0 0
D67030GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 88–Jun 97 60 0 0 0 0 - - - 72 0 0 0
D67010L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 0 - - - 136 0 0 0
D67010GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
BiCMOS Jan 89–Jun 99
(cumulative)
280 0 0 0 0 - - - 296 0 0 0
4B. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 200 0 0 0 0 - - - 235 0 0 0
4C. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 90–Jun 97 60 0 0 0 0 - - - 72 0 0 0
CMOS-3 Jan 89–Jun 99
(cumulative)
260 0 0 0 0 - - - 307 0 0 0
4D. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 140 0 0 0 0 - - - 156 0 0 0
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 182 1 0 0 0 - - - 206 0 0 0
D65024L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 89–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 91–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 89–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 240 0 0 0 0 - - - 276 0 0 0
D65070L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 80 0 0 0 0 - - - 87 0 0 0
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 20 1 0 0 0 - - - 20 0 0 0
4E. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65012L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
D65012L(80-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 13: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
13
Table 4. Other Life Test Summaries (HTSL, HHSL, T/H) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
HTSL Failures Hours
HHSL Failures Hours
T/H FailuresHours
Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D65013GF(64-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Sep 98 120 0 0 0 0 - - - 144 0 0 0
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Jun 97 240 0 0 0 0 - - - 288 0 0 0
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
D65031L(68-pin PLCC)
Feb 96–Mar 98 60 0 0 0 0 - - - 72 0 0 0
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 95–Jun 98 140 1 0 0 0 - - - 168 0 0 0
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 98 100 0 0 0 0 - - - 120 0 0 0
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 91–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 80 0 0 0 0 - - - 96 0 0 0
D65042GF(64-pin QFP)
Apr 88–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 0 - - - 144 0 0 0
D65042GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
D65042GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 1 0 0
D65070L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 95–Sep 98 60 0 0 0 0 - - - 72 0 0 0
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 97 80 0 0 0 0 - - - 96 0 0 0
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Jun 97 100 0 0 0 0 - - - 120 0 0 0
CMOS-4 Jan 89–Jun 99
(cumulative)
2042 3 0 0 0 - - - 2377 1 0 0
4F. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65032L (84-pin PLCC)
Jan 90–Jun 97 140 0 0 0 0 - - - 168 0 0 1
D65044L (84-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 220 0 0 0 0 - - - 184 0 0 0
D65061GF
(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 100 0 0 0 0 - - - 120 0 0 0
D65103L (68-pin PLCC)
Apr 91–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
4G. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65016GF(80-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 144 0 0 1
D65016GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 14: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
14
Table 4. Other Life Test Summaries (HTSL, HHSL, T/H) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
HTSL Failures Hours
HHSL Failures Hours
T/H FailuresHours
Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D65025L (68-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 100 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 144 0 0 0
D65025GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 95–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65025GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 90–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 96 0 0 0
D65029GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 92–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 1 0 0
D65029GD(120-pin QFP)
Jul 92–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65032L (84-pin PLCC)
Jan 91–Dec 97 1420 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 192 0 0 0
D65032G(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 97 200 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 240 0 0 0
D65044L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 94–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65044L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 98–Dec 98 20 0 - - 25 0 - - 24 0 - -
D65046GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 180 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 216 1 0 1
D65046GD(136-pin QFP)
Oct 92–Jun 97 140 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 164 0 0 0
D65046GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Mar 98 160 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 192 0 0 0
D65051GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Sep 98 120 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 144 0 0 0
D65051GD(160-pin QFP)
Jul 97–Sep 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65061L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 97–Sep 98 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65061GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 100 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
D65061GD
(136-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 180 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 240 0 0 0
D65062GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65062GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65081L (84-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65082GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65103L (68-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 98 440 0 0 0 450 0 0 0 432 0 0 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 15: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
15
Table 4. Other Life Test Summaries (HTSL, HHSL, T/H) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
HTSL Failures Hours
HHSL Failures Hours
T/H FailuresHours
Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D65103GD(80-pin QFP)
Jul 97– Dec 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65103GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65180GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 144 0 0 0
CMOS-5 Jan 88–Jun 99
(cumulative)
3040 0 0 0 3070 0 0 0 3468 2 0 3
4H. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65622GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 96–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65632
(100-pin QFP)
Sep 97–Dec 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65640GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 97–Jun 98 80 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 96 1 0 0
D65640GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 95–Sep 98 180 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 216 0 0 0
D65640GD(120-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Sep 98 260 0 0 0 320 0 0 0 312 0 0 0
D65646GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 94–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65646GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 95–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0
D65650GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 92–Jun 97 60 1 0 0 75 0 0 0 72 0 0 0
D65650GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
D65650GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Sep 97 320 0 0 0 400 0 0 0 384 0 0 0
D65654GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 80 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 96 0 0 0
D65654GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Dec 98 220 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 264 0 0 0
D65658GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Dec 97 179 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 216 0 0 1
D65658GD(208-pin QFP)
Apr 95–Jun 98 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 1 120 0 0 0
CMOS-6, 6A Jan 88–Jun 99
(cumulative)
1619 1 0 0 1994 0 0 1 1944 1 0 1
4I. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
D65841GJ
(144-pin QFP)
Mar 96–Jan 97 0 - - - 0 - - - 264 0 0 0
D65848GN
(240-pin TAB QFP)
Mar 96–Jan 97 0 - - - 0 - - - 264 0 0 0
D65895GL
(304-pin QFP FP)
Mar 96–Dec 96 0 - - - 0 - - - 240 0 0 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 16: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
16
Table 4. Other Life Test Summaries (HTSL, HHSL, T/H) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
HTSL Failures Hours
HHSL Failures Hours
T/H FailuresHours
Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D65895S1
(352-pin PBGA)
Mar 96–Dec 96 0 - - - 0 - - - 240 0 0 0
4J. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65832GD
(208-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Jun 99 60 0 0 0 0 - - - 72 0 0 0
CMOS-8L Mar 96–Jun 99
(cumulative)
60 0 0 0 0 - - - 1080 0 0 0
4K. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
TEG 1
(304-pin QFP)
May 97-Sep 97 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
TEG 2
(352-pin TBGA)
May 97-Sep 97 24 0 0 0 0 - - - 24 0 0 0
4L. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D82174GD
(160-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Mar 99 0 - - - 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
CB-C9 May 97–Jun 99
(cumulative)44 0 0 0 0 - - - 96 0 0 0
4M. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D82286S1(272-pin PBGA)
Oct 98–Dec 98 0 - - - 0 - - - 144 0 0 0
D82287S1(272-pin PBGA)
Jan 99–Mar 99 20 0 0 0 0 - - - 72 0 0 0
CB-C9VX/VM Oct 98–Jun 99
(cumulative)20 0 0 0 0 - - - 216 0 0 0
4N. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D83901S1(320-pin PBGA)
Apr 99–Jun 99 0 - - - 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
UC-II Apr 99–Jun 99
(cumulative)0 - - - 0 - - - 48 0 0 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 17: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
17
Table 5. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (T/C, PCT)
This table summarizes the environmental and mechanical test results of the different process types. The datais summarized for the current period and for past periods of cumulative data.
Process
Type
Process
Period
T/C Failures
Cycles
PCT Failures
Hours
Qty 100 300 Qty 96 192
5A. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D67070GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 89–Jun 97 90 0 0 60 0 0
D67030GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 88–Jun 97 72 0 0 60 0 0
D67010L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 166 0 0 40 0 0
D67010GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
BiCMOS Oct 88–Jun 99(cumulative)
353 0 0 180 0 0
5B. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 219 0 0 0 - -
5C. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 75 0 0 0 - -
CMOS-3 Jan 89–Jun 99(cumulative)
294 0 0 0 - -
5D. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 158 0 0 0 - -
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 130 0 0 0 - -
D65024L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 89–Jun 97 25 0 0 0 - -
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 91–Jun 97 25 0 0 0 - -
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 89–Jun 97 25 0 0 0 - -
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 280 0 1 0 - -
D65070L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 65 0 0 0 - -
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 20 0 0 0 - -
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 48 0 - 0 - -
5E. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65012L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65012GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65013GF(64-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Sep 98 150 0 0 120 0 0
![Page 18: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
18
Table 5. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (T/C, PCT) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
T/C FailuresCycles
PCT FailuresHours
Qty 100 300 Qty 96 192
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Jun 97 300 0 0 180 0 0
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65031L(68-pin PLCC)
Feb 96–Mar 98 75 0 0 60 0 0
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 95–Jun 98 175 0 0 140 8 0
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 98 125 0 0 100 1 0
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 91–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 75 0 0 60 0 0
D65042GF(64-pin QFP)
Apr 88–Jun 97 150 0 0 0 - -
D65042GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65042GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 2 0
D65070L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 95–Sep 98 75 0 0 60 0 0
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 97 100 0 0 80 0 0
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Jun 97 125 0 0 100 0 0
CMOS-4 Apr 88–Jun 99
(cumulative)
2401 0 1 1120 11 0
5F. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 90–Jun 97 175 0 0 0 - -
D65044L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 275 0 0 0 - -
D65061GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 - -
D65103L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 91–Jun 97 25 0 0 0 - -
5G. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65016GF(80-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 150 1 0 120 0 0
D65016GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65025L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 144 0 0 80 0 0
D65025GF(80-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65025GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 90–Jun 97 120 0 0 0 - -
![Page 19: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
19
Table 5. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (T/C, PCT) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
T/C FailuresCycles
PCT FailuresHours
Qty 100 300 Qty 96 192
D65029GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65029GD(120-pin QFP)
Jul 92–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 91–Dec 97 200 0 0 80 1 0
D65032GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 97 250 0 0 180 0 0
D65044L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 94–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65044L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 98–Dec 98 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65046GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 250 0 0 120 0 0
D65046GD(136-pin QFP)
Oct 92–Jun 97 150 0 0 140 0 0
D65046GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Mar 98 200 0 1 60 0 0
D65051GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Sep 98 150 0 0 120 0 0
D65051GD(160-pin QFP)
Jul 97–Sep 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65061L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 96–Sep 98 75 0 0 60 0 2
D65061GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 120 0 0 100 0 0
D65061GD(136-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Jun 97 225 0 1 120 0 0
D65062GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65062GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65082GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65103L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 98 496 2 2 300 1 1
D65103GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 97–Dec 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65103GF(160-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65180GF
(160-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 120 0 0 80 0 0
![Page 20: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
20
Table 5. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (T/C, PCT) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
T/C FailuresCycles
PCT FailuresHours
Qty 100 300 Qty 96 192
CMOS-5 Jul 88–Jun 99 (cumulative)
3720 3 4 1940 2 3
5H. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65622GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 96–Jun 96 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65632
(100-pin QFP)
Sep 97–Dec 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65640GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 97–Jun 98 100 0 0 80 0 0
D65640GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 94–Sep 98 300 0 1 200 1 0
D65640GD(120-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Sep 98 275 0 0 220 0 0
D65646GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 94–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65646GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 95–Jun 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
D65650GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 75 0 0 70 0 0
D65650GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 50 0 0 40 0 0
D65650GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Sep 97 375 0 0 320 0 0
D65654GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 100 0 0 80 0 0
D65654GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Dec 98 270 0 0 220 0 0
D65658GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Dec 97 225 0 0 160 1 0
D65658GD(208-pin QFP)
Apr 95–Jun 98 125 0 0 100 0 0
CMOS-6, 6A Jul 91–Jun 99(cumulative)
2020 0 1 1590 2 0
5I. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
D65841GJ
(144-pin QFP)
Mar 96–Jan 97 250 0 0 240 0 0
D65848GN
(240-pin TAB QFP)
Mar 96–Jan 97 125 0 0 120 0 0
D65895GL
(304-pin QFP FP)
Mar 96–Dec 96 150 0 0 144 0 0
D65895S1
(352-pin PBGA)
Mar 96–Dec 96 100 0 0 72 0 0
5J. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65832GD
(208-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Jun 99 150 0 0 60 0 0
![Page 21: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
21
Table 5. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (T/C, PCT) (continued)
Process
Type
Process
Period
T/C FailuresCycles
PCT FailuresHours
Qty 100 300 Qty 96 192
CMOS-8L Mar 96–Jun 99(cumulative)
775 0 0 636 0 0
5K. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
TEG 1
(304-pin QFP)
May 97–Sep 97 25 0 0 20 0 0
TEG 2
(352-pin TBGA)
May 97–Sep 97 25 0 0 0 - -
5L. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D82174GD
(160-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Mar 99 50 0 0 40 0 0
CB-C9 May 97–Jun 99(cumulative)
100 0 0 60 0 0
5M. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN JAPAN
TEG 1
(304-pin QFP)
Apr 98-Jun 98 25 0 0 0 - -
5N. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D82286S1
(272-pin PBGA)
Oct 98–Dec 98 231 0 0 231 0 0
D82287S1
(272-pin PBGA)
Jan 99–Mar 99 25 0 0 20 0 0
CB-C9VX/VM Apr 98–Jun 99(cumulative)
281 0 0 251 0 0
5O. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D83901S1
(320-pin PBGA)
Apr 99–Jun 99 154 0 0 52 0 0
UC-II Apr 99–Jun 99(cumulative)
154 0 0 52 0 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 22: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
22
Table 6. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (LI, SD, TS)
This table summarizes the environmental and mechanical test results of the different process types. The datais summarized for the current period and for past periods of cumulative data.
Process Process LI SD TS
Type Period Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail
6A. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D67010L(68-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 82 0
D67010GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 18 0
BICMOS Jan 89–Jun 99
(cumulative)
0 - 0 - 100 0
6B. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 88–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 76 0
D65022L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 58 0
D65030L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 91–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 18 0
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 89–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 18 0
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 138 0
D65070L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 88–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 48 0
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 88–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 10 0
6C. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65012L(64-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 0 - 5 0 18 0
D65012GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 10 0 10 0 36 0
D65013GF(64-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Dec 97 0 - 10 0 0 -
D65013GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Sep 98 55 0 55 0 180 0
D65022L(64-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 0 - 5 0 18 0
D65031(68-pin PLCC)
Sep 97–Mar 98 0 - 10 0 0 -
D65031L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 95–Jun 98 0 - 40 0 126 0
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 91–Jun 98 20 0 25 0 72 0
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jul 91–Jun 97 0 - 5 0 54 0
![Page 23: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
23
Table 6. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (LI, SD, TS) (continued)
Process Process LI SD TS
Type Period Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail
D65042L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 92–Jun 97 0 - 10 0 36 1
D65042GF(80-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65042GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 36 0
D65070L
(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 95–Sep 98 0 - 15 0 36 0
D65081L(84-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 97 0 - 10 0 54 0
D65081GF(100-pin QFP)
Apr 94–Jun 97 10 0 10 0 72 0
CMOS-4 Apr 88–Jun 99(cumulative)
105 0 225 0 1140 1
6D. FABRICATED IN JAPAN, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 90–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 126 0
D65044L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 89–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 72 0
D65103L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 91–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 18 0
6E. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65016GF(80-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 20 0 20 0 90 0
D65016GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Jun 97 5 0 4 0 18 0
D65025L(68-pin PLCC)
Oct 92–Jun 97 0 - 15 0 90 0
D65025GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 95–Jun 97 10 0 10 0 36 0
D65029GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65031GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65032L(84-pin PLCC)
Jan 91–Dec 97 0 - 20 0 108 0
D65044L(68-pin PLCC)
Jul 94–Jun 97 0 - 0 - 36 0
D65044L(84-pin PLCC)
Oct 98–Dec 98 0 - 5 0 0 -
D65046GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Jun 97 40 0 40 0 126 0
![Page 24: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
24
Table 6. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (LI, SD, TS) (continued)
Process Process LI SD TS
Type Period Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail
D65046GD(136-pin QFP)
Oct 92–Jun 97 35 0 35 0 126 0
D65046GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 91–Mar 98 10 0 15 0 120 0
D65051GD(120-pin QFP)
Jan 96–Sep 98 25 0 25 0 54 0
D65061L (68-pin PLCC)
Oct 96–Sep 98 0 - 5 0 36 0
D65061GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65061GD(136-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Jun 97 50 0 50 0 180 0
D65062GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65062GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 10 0 10 0 36 0
D65082GD(160-pin QFP)
Apr 93–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65103L(68-pin PLCC)
Apr 90–Jun 98 0 - 45 0 216 0
D65103GD(80-pin QFP)
Jul 97–Dec 97 5 0 10 0 18 1
D65103GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 93–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 36 0
D65180GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 90–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 54 0
CMOS-5 Jul 88–Jun 99(cumulative)
245 0 349 0 1710 1
6F. FABRICATED IN ROSEVILLE, ASSEMBLED IN ROSEVILLE
D65622GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 96–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
D65632(100-pin QFP)
Sep 97–Dec 97 0 - 5 0 0 -
D65640GF(80-pin QFP)
Apr 97–Jun 98 10 0 15 0 36 0
D65640GF(100-pin QFP)
Jan 94–Sep 98 40 0 40 0 144 0
D65640GD(120-pin QFP)
Apr 92–Sep 98 50 0 60 0 162 0
D65646GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 94–Jun 97 10 0 10 0 36 0
D65646GD(136-pin QFP)
Jul 95–Jun 97 5 0 5 0 18 0
![Page 25: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
25
Table 6. Environmental and Mechanical Test Summaries (LI, SD, TS) (continued)
Process Process LI SD TS
Type Period Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail Qty No. of Fail
D65650GF(80-pin QFP)
Jul 91–Jun 97 15 0 15 0 54 0
D65650GF(100-pin QFP)
Jul 93–Jun 97 10 0 10 0 36 0
D65650GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Sep 97 45 0 45 0 234 0
D65654GF(100-pin QFP)
Oct 93–Jun 97 20 0 20 0 72 0
D65654GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 92–Dec 98 40 0 39 0 126 0
D65658GD(160-pin QFP)
Jan 91–Dec 97 30 0 35 0 108 0
D65658GD(208-pin QFP)
Apr 95–Jun 97 15 0 25 0 108 0
CMOS-6, 6A Jul 88–Jun 99(cumulative)
295 0 329 0 1152 0
Note: Details of failures are given in Table 7.
![Page 26: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
26
Table 7. Failure Summaries
CMOS-4
Test Item Duration Period Failure
HTSL 168 hrs Jul 88–Oct 88 1 Functional Failure
HTSL 168 hrs Jul 88–Oct 88 1 Functional Failure
HTB 168 hrs Jul 91–Sep 91 1 Functional Failure
T/H 168 hrs Jan 93–Apr 93 1 Functional Failure
T/C 300 cyc Apr 88–Jun 88 1 Functional Failure
HTB 1000 hrs Apr 96–Jun 96 1 Functional Failure
TS 15 cyc Apr 96–Jun 96 1 DC Failure
HTSL 168 hrs Jul 96–Sep 96 1 Functional Failure
PCT 96 hrs Oct 96–Dec 96 1 DC Failure
PCT 96 hrs Apr 97–Jun 97 7 Functional, 1 DC Failures
CMOS-5
Test Item Duration Period Failure
T/H 1000 hrs Jan 91–Apr 91 1 DC Failure
T/H 1000 hrs Oct 95–Dec 95 1 DC Failure
T/H 168 hrs Jul 93–Sep 93 1 DC Failure
T/H 1000 hrs Jul 92–Sep 92 1 DC Failure
T/C 300 cyc Jan 92–Mar 92 2 DC Failures
T/C 300 cyc Jan 94–Mar 94 1 Functional Failure
T/C 300 cyc Jan 93–Mar 93 1 Functional Failure
T/C 100 cyc Oct 96–Dec 96 1 DC Failure
PCT 192 hrs Oct 96–Dec 96 1 DC Failure
T/C 100 cyc Oct 96–Dec 96 1 DC Failure
PCT 96 hrs Apr 97–Jun 97 1 DC Failure
TS 15 cyc Jul 97–Sep 97 1 DC Failure
CMOS-6, 6A
Test Item Duration Period Failure
HTSL 168 hrs Jul 92–Sep 92 1 DC Failure
PCT 96 hrs Oct 93–Dec 93 1 Functional Failure
HHSL 1000 hrs Jan 93–Apr 93 1 Functional Failure
PCT 96 hrs Jul 96–Sep 96 1 DC Failure
T/C 300 cyc Oct 96–Dec 96 1 Functional Failure
T/H 1000 hrs Oct 96–Dec 96 1 DC Failure
T/H 168 hrs Apr 97–Jun 97 1 Functional Failure
![Page 27: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
27
Table 8. CMOS-8L Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data (Jan - Jun 99)
The following device types in all package types are covered in the CMOS-8L process family:
HTB Failures (Hours)
HTSL Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D65832GD
(208-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Jun 99 72 0 0 0 60 0 0 0
PCT Failures(Hours)
T/C Failures(Cycles)
T/H Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 96 192 Qty 100 300 Qty 168 500 1000
D65832GD
(208-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Jun 99 60 0 0 150 0 0 72 0 0 0
Table 9. CB-C9 Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data (Jan - Mar 99)
The following device types in all package types are covered in the CB-C9 process family:
HTB Failures (Hours)
HTSL Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D82174GD
(160-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Mar 99 0 - - - 0 - - -
PCT Failures(Hours)
T/C Failures(Cycles)
T/H Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 96 192 Qty 100 300 Qty 168 500 1000
D82174GD
(160-pin QFP)
Jan 99–Mar 99 40 0 0 50 0 0 48 0 0 0
![Page 28: d65025l](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050720/55370ab44a7959361a8b4b8d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
NEC Electronics Inc. Roseville Manufacturing
28
Table 10. CB-C9VX/VM Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data (Jan - Jun 99)
The following device types in all package types are covered in the CB-C9VX/VM process family:
HTB Failures (Hours)
HTSL Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D82287S1
(272-pin PBGA)
Jan 99–Jun 99 160 0 0 0 20 0 0 0
PCT Failures(Hours)
T/C Failures(Cycles)
T/H Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 96 192 Qty 100 300 Qty 168 500 1000
D82287S1
(272-pin PBGA)
Jan 99–Jun 99 20 0 0 25 0 0 72 0 0 0
Table 11. UC-II Process Family, Quarterly Reliability Data (Apr - Jun 99)
The following device types in all package types are covered in the UC-II process family:
HTB Failures (Hours)
HTSL Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 168 500 1000 Qty 168 500 1000
D83901S1
(320-pin PBGA)
Apr 99–Jun 99 48 0 0 0 0 - - -
PCT Failures(Hours)
T/C Failures(Cycles)
T/H Failures(Hours)
Device Type Time Period Qty 96 192 Qty 100 300 Qty 168 500 1000
D83901S1
(320-pin PBGA)
Apr 99–Jun 99 52 0 0 154 0 0 48 0 0 0