D2 GW RLF01-RightsandEntitlements

7/29/2019 D2 GW RLF01-RightsandEntitlements

1/12

Rights and Entitlement based

work and Resilience

Group Work Presentation Template

06-08 Feb 2013, Kathmandu

Regional Consultation on Resilience-06-08 Feb 2013, Kathmandu, Nepal | Christian Aid | South Asia

Group 03


2/12

Suggestions to Brainstorm

What part of your work seems to fit in the RL

framework

Did you get any new realities/ insights for your work

from the RL framework What areas of engagement does this suggest for the

future and

How would you suggest this framework be adapted /modified to be useful in your context

Please answer from the thematic groups

perspectiveRegional Consultation on Resilience-06-08Feb 2013, Kathmandu, Nepal | Christian

Aid | South Asia


3/12

What part of your work seems to

fit in the RL framework Out of the 6 components we touch all.

Try to raise voice first at grassroots

Local power structures powerful & powerless

Power within affirming identity, raising awareness

Power with alliances with others

Power to capacity to act raise voice (against

money lenders, exploitative players)



4/12

Governance traditional (PESA) & local (PRI)

Social (marginalised) dalits, tribals, minorities, women Environment protection & regeneration of forest,

water, land, salinity, mangroves, prevent erosion

(riverine)

Equality socio-economic equality & gender

participation, awareness, capacity, campaigns, wages,

Economy access to market, value-chain

Services access to govt services/entitlements,insurance, banking, agro-business (market), SMS EWS,

Crop/animal insurance private (through NGO or

private). Improved seed varietiesRegional Consultation on Resilience-06-08 Feb 2013, Kathmandu, Nepal | Christian Aid | South Asia


5/12

Asset

Natural - Improved seed

variety, livestock

Financial SHG savings,

farmer club community assets

grain bank, CPR (grazing

grounds)

Human training,

technical knowledge/

skill, traditional

knowledge Physical agri

implements,

Social leadership

qualities, elected rep,

traditional systems

shared labour, CBO

member, FCRegional Consultation on Resilience-06-08 Feb 2013, Kathmandu, Nepal | Christian Aid | South Asia


6/12

Migration social,

economic,

Displacement

enviroment, socialrights, economy,

equality

Gender in eg

Improved seed varieties

knowledge & service

NREGA social protection

(rights/entitlement)economy,

FRA links to all



7/12

Rights/entitlements

Entitlements:

Pensions, allowances,

VGD, VGF

Rights of children, PWD,widows, elderly, single

women,

Tribal rights (FRA, PESA,customary rights)

Issue based campaigns

Land, Water, Forest

Right to Food campaign

Right to work as a

fundamental right



8/12

new realities/ insights for your

work from the RL framework Areas were not engaging much in:

Communications

Housing & energy



9/12

What areas of engagement does

this suggest for the future and Transportation creating link roads through

NREGA

Energy

Dairybiogas + childrens nutrition (milk) thinkingof promoting dairy for childrens

Solar energy for domestic use

Communication - Information regarding market,weather & agri



10/12

How would you suggest this

framework be adapted / modified

to be useful in your context

Household assets are in the pentagram, butcommunity assets, grazing grounds, ponds,

Where would you see migration? (PAR)



11/12

Discussion Scheme (right/entitlement)? Bangladesh

Entitlement can demand

Schemelocal govt is given a target (1000 VGF), so if Im not in the

1000 I cannot demand that.

Right to primary education is a right.

Demand supply problem in Bangladesh so how do you unlick the

lower rungs of local govt.

At national level why no investment in 40 days work? this is for

certain districts only

Selection of district & beneficiaries political

NGO efforts union & uppazilla (ADP prepared) no power & resource

so a wishlist National level efforts human rights perpective e.g. right to food,

Need to put Bangladesh case in political context

These institutions are young & fragile



12/12

Starting pointassets & how HH interacts with PIP

Starting point isnt rights but should it be? If we

start from what rights a human being should have,

then assess what rights are being accessed/denied.

Then see PIP (policies inst. processes) enable or deny rights.

Why cant UN framework for HR be starting point for

this framework?... Assets may not be the startingpoint for many extreme poor.

Resource constraint for resourcing rights in Bang

Human rights language challenge in Bang Important to identify whom to work with.

Lowest 20%, landless,

Need to change the institutions (even NGOs)Regional Consultation on Resilience-06-08 Feb 2013, Kathmandu, Nepal | Christian Aid | South Asia

D2 GW RLF01-RightsandEntitlements

Documents

Transcript of D2 GW RLF01-RightsandEntitlements