D. Cavalli, S. Resconi 2 Dec 2008 EtMiss Software updates Jet/EtMiss Meeting D. Cavalli, S. Resconi.
-
Upload
kenneth-richardson -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of D. Cavalli, S. Resconi 2 Dec 2008 EtMiss Software updates Jet/EtMiss Meeting D. Cavalli, S. Resconi.
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
EtMiss Software updatesEtMiss Software updates
Jet/EtMiss Meeting
D. Cavalli, S. Resconi
22
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
In first processing of single beam data (Sept 08) highest level of descoping:In first processing of single beam data (Sept 08) highest level of descoping:
Only METAlg with a minimal set of MET Tools to calculate:
MET_Base = EtMiss from all CaloCells (Ecell2 noise)
etx(), ety(), sumet(),
exCalo(CaloReg), eyCalo(CaloReg), etSumCalo(CaloReg),ncellCalo(CaloReg)
CaloReg = PEMB, EMB, PEMEC, EME, TILE, HEC, FCAL
exReg(EtaReg), etReg(EtaReg), etSumReg(EtaReg)
EtaReg = Central (||1.5), EndCap (1.5|| 3.2), Forward (3.2||5)
Since rel 14.2.23.2 added quantity for basic performance/noise studies with first data:
MET_Base0 = EtMiss from all CaloCells WITHOUT any noise cuts
Available in “data08_cosmag*recon*f75*”
In next reprocessing (rel 14.5.0) no need to descope MET:In next reprocessing (rel 14.5.0) no need to descope MET:
All combined reco algo will run, all needed input objects to MET will be available
Only one problem with input muon containers not available, should be fixed by muon
experts
MissingET processing on real data
33
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
Implement in MET package more basic objects to study performances, Implement in MET package more basic objects to study performances,
and for monitoring / cleaning with first data and for monitoring / cleaning with first data (from the experience with cosmics)(from the experience with cosmics)
MET reconstruction from Calo / TopoTowers:
simple implementation: add a new tool that loops on Towers and calculate MET
MET in calo samplings and eta/phi slices:
Could be implemented directly in MET
P. Loch proposal: implement a cell map in a package related to event quantities, this could be a common tool for MET, for monitoring, etc (Adam volunteered to work on that…)
Already available: SUMET_BSE_EM = SumET in EM calos / SumET_Base
MissingET in view of first data
cosmics
Ztautau
J4SUMET_BASE_EM:
• good candidate for cleaning cuts
• should be tested in cosmics studies
• can be calculated on AOD/ESD/DPD
44
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
Implement in MET package the possibility to mask “Bad Channels” in theImplement in MET package the possibility to mask “Bad Channels” in the
calculation of EtMiss calculation of EtMiss
Problematic channels should be treated as much as possible at calorimeter level to guarantee a consistent treatment in all combined reconstruction algorithms
MET will use the official treatment / tools provided by calorimeters experts
Different tools are available : LArBadChannelTool, TileBadChannelTool, CaloBadChannelTool (combined info for LAr + Tile)
In contact with LAr+Tile experts to understand which tools to use and how to proceed
Work in progress in the context of the Jet/EtMiss Data Preparation Task Force
MissingET in view of first data
55
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
Some improvements related to input muon containers:
• Since rel 14.4.0 MET uses muon containers available both in ESD and AOD: “StacoMuonCollection”, “CaloMuonCollection”
For what concern TopoCluster input containers:
• No more need to re-reconstruct TopoClusters on the fly to get “CaloTopoCluster” container used to calculate MET from uncalibrated TC
• Possibility to switch to the uncalibrated signal state of the TopoClusters
to be implemented in MET
MissingET re-reconstruction on ESDs
MissingET re-reconstruction on AODs
On AOD: NOT possible to re-calculate EtMiss at Cell level. Overlap removal among reco objects cannot be done at CaloCell level:
• Ambiguity resolution could be based on Topoclusters BUT:
• electrons/photons and muons are NOT built on TopoClusters
• in AOD we have all CaloCells for electons/photons/muons
• The idea is to measure common cell content between different kind of clusters:
• Calculate the likelihood that a cell is within a TopoCluster envelop around its barycenter fraction of Ncells/energy from ele in Topocluster
• Code is existing but still under test/optimization
• Could be a common tool for overlap removal at AOD level (discussion at the last PAT)
66
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
• Towards the best Refined Calibration:
METRefEleTool: test of CalibHits based electron calib (No out-of-cone corr) in progress now
METRefJetTool: apply scale factor (apart out-of-cone corr)need to have separate
corrections due to different effects / use correction factor from track jets to recover energy losses METRefMuonTool: plan to move to use TrackInCaloTools instead of TrackToCalo
• Muon term: bug fix affecting calculation of muon term for isolated muos in tag MissingET-03-01-25 check/improve cleaning cuts it would be usefull to have a common tool provided by muon experts (started discussion with Ketevi)
• Merging with ObjMissingET:
Include calibration of cells outside reconstructed objects provided by ObjMET: still to finalize the integration in MissingET package (Xin Chen)
….also move MissingETSignificance to use MET objects (Xin Chen)
• METPerformance package (proposal by Adam Y.): official package to provide tools for measuring the MET algorithm performance
see talk by Adam Y. tomorrow at the Jet/EtMiss Data Preparation task force
Other deliverables for rel 15
77
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
BACKUP SLIDES
88
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
MET_Base0
MET_Base0 and MET_Base distribution on RNDM trigger: data08_cosmag.00092100.physics_RNDM.recon.ESD.o4_f75_T1224790081
MET_Base, MET_Base0
<> = - 0.7, RMS=3.4
<> = - 2.5, RMS=6.8
<> = 0.3, RMS=3.5
<> = 0.4, RMS=6.8
EyMiss distribution not centered on 0:
EyMiss_Base0 more evident behaviour
Due to HEC problems ?
MET_Base0 can be useful to study noise and to identify calo problems
ExMiss EyMiss EyMiss_HEC
<> = - 0.5, RMS=2.4
<> = - 1.8, RMS= 4
No masking of bad cells applied
will be provided at Calo level ?
99
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
EM fraction of SumET = SumET in EM calos / SumET_Base
SUMET_BASE_EM =(SumET_EMB+ SumET_PEMB+SumET_EMEC+ SumET_PEMEC) / SumET_Base
those info are already available in ESD / AOD / CBNT
EM fraction of SUMET_Base
cosmics:
data08_cosmag.00092099.physics_L1Calo
Ztautau sample:
trig1_misal1_csc11.005188.A3_Ztautau_filter
J4 sample:
trig1_misal1_csc11.005013.J4_pythia_jetjet
SUMET_BASE_EM is a good candidate for Cleaning cuts
Can be tested in cosmics studies.
1010
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
re-calculate / re-calibrate changing calibration and/or particle-Identification
On AOD: NOT possible to re-calculate EtMiss at Cell level. Overlap removal among reco objects cannot be done at CaloCell level.
How to implement ambiguity resolution at AOD level ?
see talk by Peter L. at Tucson ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop, March 08:
Ambiguity resolution could be based on Topoclusters BUT:
electrons/photons and muons are NOT built on TopoClusters
no direct association between muons and TopoClusters
The idea is to measure common cell content between different kind of clusters:
in AOD we have all CaloCells for electons/photons/muons
AOD TopoCluster have no cells, so a criteria has to be
applied: Calculate the likelihood that a cell is within a TopoCluster envelop around its barycenter
Code is existing but still under test/optimization:
re-used the same MET Tools written for ESD
same map as ESD Cell map can be used for clusters
MissingET reconstruction on AODs
1111
D. Cavalli, S. D. Cavalli, S. ResconiResconi
2 Dec 20082 Dec 2008
Merging with ObjMissingET (in progress):Merging with ObjMissingET (in progress):
Calibration of cells outside reconstructed objects:
Cells in TopoClusters outside reconstructed objects are taken into account in the EtMiss calculation (MET_CellOut)
special calibration for low pT depositions provided by ObjMET:
in MissingETTools package: MiniJetTool and PionWeightTool
integration in MissingET package, in METRefinedClusterOut :
build the MiniJet Collection using MiniJetTool
call get_weight(*Cell, *TopoClus) method provided by PionWeightTool:
if the TopoClus belongs to a MiniJet returns a Cell weight that depends to the /classification of the MiniJet
if the TopoClus does not belong to a MiniJet returns a Cell weight that depends on the CaloRegion of the
TopoClus (Barrel, Endcap, FCal)
output object key= MET_CellOutMiniJet
still to finalize testing before putting in CVS
in contact with Xin Chen
Merging with ObjMET