Cytokeratin expressing epithelioid cells in ovarian sclerosing stromal tumor: A potential diagnostic...

2

Click here to load reader

Transcript of Cytokeratin expressing epithelioid cells in ovarian sclerosing stromal tumor: A potential diagnostic...

Page 1: Cytokeratin expressing epithelioid cells in ovarian sclerosing stromal tumor: A potential diagnostic pitfall that may be mistaken for metastatic carcinoma

letters

Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 3(4) Fourth Quarter 2010 hemoncstem.edmgr.com 207

tomy and gastrointestinal endoscopffic biopsy were all revealed amyloid depositions in the specimens. Bone marrow aspirations were dry tap and an increase in the reticulin fibers were presented in the bone marrow biopsy material.

Recently two children with the diagnosis of myelodysplastic synffdrome has been reported as having renal amyloidosis after the proteinffuria begun as other adult cases and this finding is similar to our case because of the clonal origin of both diseases.6 Another recent report in the literature presented an adult case with the diagnosis of myelofibrosis, whose renal biopsy, performed for proteinuria, revealed amyloidosis.7

Although the pathophysiologiffcal mechanism(s) of amyloidosis is not known exactly, we believe that it is attributable to chronic inflamffmation and cytokines observed in other clonal disorders such as myffelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. As amyffloidosis may occur secondarily to some diseases such as IMF as well. The potential for such concomitance should be kept in mind in patients with IMF or while investigating the cause of amyloidosis.

Göksel Leblebisatan,a Ilgen Sasmaz,b Bulent Antmen,b Melek Ergin,b Yurdanur Kılınçb

from the aGaziantep children hospital and bÇukurova university, Gaziantep, turkey

correspondence: Göksel leblebisatan, mdpediatric hematologyGaziantep children hospitalGaziantep 27270, [email protected]

doi: 10.5144/1658-3876.2010.206

1. Litchman MA. The idiopathic Myelofibrosis (Chapter 89. in: Lichtman MA, Beutler E, Kipps TJ, Seligsohn U, editors. Williams Hematology, Seventh edn. By McGraw-Hill professional, 2006; 1295-314.2. Jacobson Dr, Seldin DC, Buxbaum JN. The Amyloidosis (Chapter 101). in: Lichtman MA, Beu--tler E, Kipps TJ, Seligsohn U, editors. Williams He--matology, Seventh edn. By McGraw-Hill profes--sional, 2006; 1335-48.3. reilly JT. idiopathic myelofibrosis: pathogenesis to treatment. Hematol Oncol. 2006 Jun; 24(2): 56-63.4. Ferhanoglu B, Erzin y, Ba@ar Z, Ttiztiner HA. Secondary amyloidosis in the course of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Leukemia research. 1997;21(9): 897-898.5. Akikusa B, Komatsu T, Kondo y, yokota T, Uchino F, yonemitsu H. Amyloidosis complicating idio--pathic myelofibrosis. Archives of pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 1987; 11: 525.6. Bogdanovic r, Kuzmanovic M, Markovic-Lip--kovski J, Ognjanovic M, Micic D, Stankovic i, Stajic N, Nikolic V, Bunjevacki G. Glomerular in--volvement in myelodysplastic syndromes. pediatr Nephrol. 2001 Dec;16(12):1053-7. 7. Chan KW, Ho Cp. Amyloidosis complicating idiopathic myelofibrosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Dec;34(6):E27.

REFERENCES

Cytokeratin expressing epithelioid cells in ovarian sclerosing stromal tumor: A potential diagnostic pit--fall that may be mistaken for metastatic carcinoma

To the Editor: Sclerosing stromal tumor (SST) is a distinctive unffcommon benign neoplasm of the ovary that mostly affects young women.1f3 It is of unknown pathoffgenesis and etiology.1 However, it is accepted that SST is part of the spectrum of sex cordfstromal tumors and several studies have supported the notion that SST befflongs to the ovarian sexfcord stroffmal tumors category.1,2,4,5 It is also accepted that SST may originate from the ovarian cortical stromal cells or from the perifollicular myffoid stromal cells.1,2,4

We discovered a case of ovarffian sclerosing stromal tumor with unusual immunohistochemical exffpression of cytokeratin (CK) that

could impose an interpretation pitfffall for the novice. Microscopically, SST has a heterogeneous appearffance with cellular nodules that are usually separated by zones of edema or hypocellular fibrous hyafflinizing stroma.2 The vasculature is prominent with hemangioperiffcytomaflike staghorn blood vesffsels.2 The heterogeneous cellular components include the spindle fibroblasts, the plump myoid cells, the polygonal thecalike cells, the endothelial cells of the blood vesffsels and primitive mesenchymal cells.2,4 Immunostains for vimenfftin, inhibin, calretinin, melanfA and CD99 are usually positive, but their intensity varies.1,3,6 The myoid cells are positive for smooth musffcle actin (SMA) and sometimes for muscle specific actin (MSA) and desmin.1,4 Positivity for estroffgen and progesterone receptors has been reported.1 The cells are usually negative for cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA).1,6

In our case, a 26fyearfold woman presented with abdominal discomfffort for three months. Radiology showed a right ovarian mass. The mass was resected and showed a wellfdefined lobulated solid tumor (Figure 1). Microscopically, the mass had characteristic solid cellufflar nodules surrounded and sepaffrated by zones of edematous and hypocellular fibrous stromal tissue with prominent vascular proliferafftion (Figure 2). The cellular nodffules showed large vacuolated cells with large nuclei and prominent nucleoli (Figure 3). Frequent cells showed moderate atypia some of which were signet ringflike cells. Mucin stains (Alcian blue and muffcicarmine) were negative. These epithelioid cells were individually wrapped by reticulin fibers.

Immunohistochemistry showed that the spindle and plump oval

Page 2: Cytokeratin expressing epithelioid cells in ovarian sclerosing stromal tumor: A potential diagnostic pitfall that may be mistaken for metastatic carcinoma

Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 3(4) Fourth Quarter 2010 hemoncstem.edmgr.com208

Figure 1. Computed tomography showed a well-defined, solid, lobulated and enhancing right adnexal mass. The uterus and the left ovary were unremarkable. inset showed the gross appearance of the outer surface and the cut surface of the resected mass. The mass had characteristic lobulated pattern of yellow nodules separated by paler gray edematous tissue.

Figure 2. Low power view showed the cellular nodules separated by edematous hypocellular fibrous stroma with prominent vasculature (Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×20).

Figure 3. A cellular nodule with large vacuolated cells with large nuclei and prominent nucleoli, intermixed with spindle and ovoid myoid cells. Few signet ring-like cells were seen (Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×400). inset highlighted scattered single cells that were strongly positive for cytokeratin (CK(AE1/AE3); Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), original magnification ×400).

stromal cells were strongly and diffffusely positive for vimentin and SMA, and were focally positive for CD10, MelanfA and MSA. They were negative for CD34, CD117, desmin, calretinin, S100, HMB45, CK, EMA, BerfEP4, B27.3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

The vacuolated thecalike epithefflioid cells, on the other hand, were vimentin positive and focally, but strongly positive for SMA, Melanf

A and calretinin. Few cellular nodffules showed frequent single cells that were also strongly positive for CK (AE1/AE3) (Figure 3) and for high molecular weight CK and to a lesser extent for CK5/6. They were negative for CK20, CK7, low molecular weight CK (CAM 5.2), EMA, BerfEP4, B72.3 and CEA. We entertained the diagnosis of ovarian SST. The patient had an uneventful postfoperative course and was well after seven months follow up.

CK positivity in ovarian stroffmal tumors can occur, but it is unffcommonly described.5,6 Expression of CK in SST is unusual.1f4 The importance of this uncommon CK immunohistochemical staining in the cellular nodules of SST is that the unwary pathologist could misffinterpret these epithelialflike vacuffolated cells as metastatic carcinoma cells. In particular, the presence of CK positive signet ringflike cells can simulate metastatic signet ring carcinoma (Krukenberg tumor) of the ovary. The fact that these cells are mucin negative, negative for EMA, BerfEP4, B72.3 and CEA, and are positive for inhibin, calffretinin and SMA should resolve

this confusion. It also emphasizes the cellular and immunohistoffchemical heterogeneity of SST in comparison to other ovarian stromal tumors, which can help in differentiating SST from fibrothffecoma and luetinizing thecoma in certain cases. This unusual CK expression may shed some light in to the origin of these cells in SST, which needs further investigation by a larger study with a larger number of cases to show the prevffalence of CK expression in SST.

Badr AbdullGaffar

from the dubai hospital, dubai,

united arab emirates

correspondence:

badr abdullGaffar, md

dubai hospital, alKhaleej road,

community 354, dubai 7272

united arab emirates

[email protected]

doi: 10.5144/1658-3876.2010.207

letters