CVO International Barometer results 2012

2012 International Fleet Barometer

2

CVO – what is it ?

Focus: professional Mobility

Cost free Studies

Annual Fleet Barometer in collaboration with

Analysis of the decision-makers‘ attitudes on fleets Overview of the main trends of the automotive market Comparison of trends across 16 countries

An expert-platform for all fleet professionals:

fleet managers, procurement specialists, manufacturers, leasing companies, advisers, insurers, press, public

authorities, researchers etc.

Created by Arval in 2002

Launched in The Netherlands in 2012

Neutral & International

3

Perimeter of the study

2002: Creation in France2005: Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland2006: Poland2007: Belgium, Czech Republic2008: Spain, India2009: UK, Greece2010: Turkey, Brazil2011: Russia2012: The Netherlands

4

Perimeter of the studyFocus Europe

5

Methodology

Sample: 4 823 interviews including 3 616 through Europe and 1 207 out of Europe

Target: Fleet managers in companies of all industries using corporate vehicles

Fieldwork period: Q1 2012

Data collection method: CATI system (Computer-assisted telephone interviewing)

Duration of the interview: 13 minutes in average

Quotas: companies size and sector

6

Methodology

Companies with less than 10 employees

Companies with 10 to 99 employees

Companies with 100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

Companies with 250 / 500 / 1 000 employees and more

Companies < 100 employees

Companies >100 employees

7

Index

Characteristics of the market

Characteristics of the fleet

Financing

Car policy and choice criteria

Services

Safety

Telematics

8



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

9

IncreaseDecrease Balance 2012

Balance 2010

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decreaseBase: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% who think that the total number of vehicles on their company fleet will…% who think that the total number of vehicles on their company fleet will…

Fleet growth potentialin next three years

Balance 2011

Balance 2009

+ 4% + 10% + 10% + 8%

+ 7% + 14% + 13% - 2%

10

Cost pressure on the company fleet

IncreaseDecrease

Balance = Cost pressure will increase – Cost pressure will decreaseBase: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% who think that this year, cost pressure on the fleet will…% who think that this year, cost pressure on the fleet will…

Balance 2011

+ 32% + 31%

+ 31% + 37%

Balance 2012

11

Don’t know

Decrease

Remain the same

Increase

Used cars resale value

% who think that the resale value of vehicles will…% who think that the resale value of vehicles will…

Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

12



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

13

Number of vehicles in fleet


1 to 10 vehicles

11 to 100 vehicles

101 to 500 vehicles

501 vehicles and more

14

Distribution of fleet


Transport vehicles

Service vehicles

Sales vehicles

Incentive vehicles

Vehicles in exchange of a monthly cost

Transport vehicles: of less than 3,5 tonsService vehicles: used for maintenance and repair of facilities, general services, after-sales services…Sales vehicles: intended for sales travel and appointments Incentive vehicles: made available to employees as part of the company’s compensation policy Vehicles in exchange of a monthly cost: deduced from the employee’s salary

15

Increased

Decreased

Perceived evolution of average duration since last year

Passenger Cars

Light Commercial Vehicles

% who think that duration of usage in the company has…% who think that duration of usage in the company has…

Base: companies Light Commercial Vehicles or Passenger Cars / Excluding second-hand vehicles

‘Don’t know’ not included

16



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

17

Operating leasingFinance leasingCar creditSelf purchase*

Main financing methodConsolidated results


*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)

‘Don’t know’ and ‘others’ excluded

Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, Poland, Belgium, Czech Republic, Spain, UK, Greece1 year only for The Netherlands

18

Operating leasing

Finance leasing

Car credit

Self purchase*

Evolution of the main financing methodConsolidated results


*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) ‘Don’t know’ and ‘others’ excluded

Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, Poland, Belgium, Czech Republic, Spain, UK, GreeceFirst year for the Netherlands

19

Operating leasing

Finance leasing

Car credit

Self purchase*

Evolution of the main financing methodConsolidated results


*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) ‘Don’t know’ and ‘others’ excluded

Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, Poland, Belgium, Czech Republic, Spain, UK, GreeceFirst year for the Netherlands

20



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

21

Decision-making department on car policy

Top Management

Administrative /Finance Direction

Fleet Director

Procurement

Human Resources

Other


22

Mobility manager

% of companies with a function that covers both corporate fleets and travel % of companies with a function that covers both corporate fleets and travel

Base: companies with 100 employees and more, with corporate vehicles

23Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Limitation of CO2 emissions when

choosing a car

Prohibition of hand free mobile phones

Restrictions on driving home after a

company party

Incentive of awards for safe drivers

Established practices concerning the car policy

% of companies having these established practices concerning their Car Policy% of companies having these established practices concerning their Car Policy

24

Already implemented

Don’t know what a mobility plan is

Considered

Mobility plan

% of companies considering mobility plan for their employees% of companies considering mobility plan for their employees

Base: companies with more than 100 employees “Not considered” not included

Total implemented + considered

25

Potential of Electric Vehicles

% who identified areas where Electric Vehicles could be suitable% who identified areas where Electric Vehicles could be suitable


2012

2011

26



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

27

% who outsource the following services% who outsource the following services

Outsourcing of services

Vehicle maintenance

Tyre replacement

24h assistance

Management of insurance

Accident management

Replacement vehicle

Fuel Management

Driver Safety training

Online reporting

28

% who think these services brought the most savings…% who think these services brought the most savings…

Savings achieved through outsourcing(All responses)

Services which brought the most savings

Outsourced service

Vehicle maintenance

Tyre replacement

24h assistance

Management of insurance

Accident management

Replacement vehicle

Fuel Management

Driver Safety training

Online reporting


29

CO2 optimization of car policy

Reporting on reliability of brands / models

CO2 reporting

Communication to drivers to decrease operational costs

Reporting for accounting and fiscal purposes

Eco driving training

Consultancy on car company policy

Grey Fleet management

Administration of pool of cars available upon reservation

% with the following services already in place% with the following services already in place

New services already in place


30

Considered

Already implemented

% considering replacing some vehicles currently individually allocated with a right-to-use pool car upon reservation% considering replacing some vehicles currently individually allocated with a right-to-use pool car upon reservation

Right-to-use pool car upon reservation

Base: companies which have the administration of pool of cars available upon reservation or which are interested

31



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

32

% of businesses who consider safe driving behavior on professional trips as…% of businesses who consider safe driving behavior on professional trips as…

Individual responsibility Don’t knowShared responsibility between company and driver

Responsibility between driver and company


33

Safety driving training

% who have mandatory safety driving training% who have mandatory safety driving training


34


% who have mandatory safety driving training% who have mandatory safety driving training


EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR GR IT NL PL PT UK

35


In-door classes

On the road

On tracks

E-learning

On Simulators

Others

What kind of mandatory safety trainings in companiesWhat kind of mandatory safety trainings in companies

Base: companies with safety training implemented

36

Effectiveness in companies with a training programEffectiveness in companies with a training program

Frequency of safety driving training

Annual

Bi annual

One off training session

Don’t know

Base: companies with safety training implemented

37



Financing


Services

Safety

Telematics

38Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Use of Telematics

Plans to implement

Implemented

% of companies using or planning to implement Telematics in the next 3 years% of companies using or planning to implement Telematics in the next 3 years

39

Purposes for using Telematics

Base: companies using or planning to use Telematics

As a vehicle locator/tracker

Reduce fuel consumption

Monitor technical car data to reduce maintenance costs

Monitor unauthorised use

Monitor driving behaviours

Improve safety of your drivers

Primary and secondary purposes for using TelematicsPrimary and secondary purposes for using Telematics

40

Open No opinion Reluctant

Acceptance of drivers concerning Geolocalisation information


Strongly opposed

Acceptance of drivers on the gathering of Geolocalisation information according to fleet managersAcceptance of drivers on the gathering of Geolocalisation information according to fleet managers

5%

-1%

Balance Open –

(Reluctant + Strongly opposed)

41

Open No opinion Reluctant


Strongly opposed

Acceptance of drivers concerning driving behaviors information

Acceptance of drivers on the gathering of driving behaviors information according to fleet managersAcceptance of drivers on the gathering of driving behaviors information according to fleet managers

15%

9%

Balance Open –

(Reluctant + Strongly opposed)

CVO International Barometer results 2012

Automotive

Transcript of CVO International Barometer results 2012