Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of...

127
Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005

Transcript of Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of...

Page 1: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

Customer Assessment

Office of Quality Management

Office of Research Services

National Institutes of Health

October 2005

Page 2: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

For more information on Performance Management in the Office of Research services:

http://www.ors.od.nih.gov/OD/OQM/Pages/index.aspx

Or Contact:

Antonio Rodriguez

[email protected]

(301) 402-3440

Acknowledgments

This training was developed by SAIC and the Office of Quality Management.

Page 3: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

3

Training Objectives

• Introduction• Customer Assessment and Performance Management• Customer Relationship Management

• The 10 Steps • Conclusion

Page 4: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

4

Customer Assessment and Performance Management

The Balanced Scorecard for Your Organization

How do we exceed Customer/stakeholder

expectations?

What do our customers/stakeholders look for in

financial results?

What skills, tools, and culture are required to

perform these processes?

What process do we need to improve to fulfill these

expectations?Strategy

Customer

Learning

Financial Internal

Page 5: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

5

Performance Measurement Model

What inputs? What processes? What products/services?

Page 6: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

6

Customer Intimacy Is Customer Quality Relationships

• Understand their business

• Know their needs

• Provide complete solutions

• Quality of the relationship

• Empower them

• Share with them

• Our team knows their team

• Follow up and feed back

Page 7: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

7

Examples of Customer Objectives

• Provide integrated transparent access to the most relevant information via the most effective information sources for NIH researchers and staff

• Improve education of customers on portfolio of services offered by Events Management

• Be readily available to our customers to provide information, customer service, and resolve issues regarding transportation and parking services

• Improve communication with customers

• Meet customer needs by providing the right mix of specialized research support services

• Improve customers’ business decisions

• Improve as single-source contact on ORS-wide administrative processes

• Increase responsiveness to customers’ varying needs

• Increase customer satisfaction with our products and services

ORS and ORF EXAMPLEOBJECTIVES

Page 8: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

8

Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

Customer measurement a piece of CRM• Describes the many activities in managing relationships with

customers

What is a relationship?• Continuing series of collaborative interactions• Occurs over time• Develops based on successive interactions• Unique for each customer

Why management?• Each interaction offers:

• Ability to customize products/services to customers• Opportunity to influence customers’ perceptions• Learn more about customers for the future

• Management of relationship encourages loyalty

Page 9: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

9© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved

Page 10: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

10

Why should YOU care about managing customers?

Times have changed• Customers have escalating needs• Competitors are delivering on these demands• If you don’t, you will be out of business• Computer technology has contributed to this new world

Business Case• Dissatisfied customers usually don’t complain• Dissatisfied customers usually do defect• Dissatisfied customers tell everyone they know• Dissatisfied customers encourage others to defect• Result --- lost business…..forever!!

Page 11: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

11

Why should ORS/ORF care about managing customers?

Management Case• NIH stakeholders want to see data

• How ORS/ORF knows we are satisfying customers • Why ORS/ORF should be the provider of choice• How ORS/ORF is planning to meet future customer needs

Government Case• Should ORS/ORF be sole source of products/services

• Can others (government or private) be providers• Cost important but also value

• GPRA• Explain in quantifiable terms how serving customers• Value provided in fulfilling Agencies’ missions• Why we should continue to receive funding and support

Page 12: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

12

If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.

Page 13: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

13

Where do you start?

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 14: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

14

The 10 Steps

1. Select the service area to measure

2. Define products/services delivered to customers

3. Identify customer segments

4. Conduct targeted customer interactions

5. Research competitors

6. Select measures

7. Plan data collection

8. Gather and analyze customer data

9. Discuss findings and recommendations

10. Take action

Page 15: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

15

Step 1 Select Service Areas to Measure

Page 16: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

16

Step 1 (cont.) Select Service Areas to Measure

Best to prioritize areas to measure

In ORS/ORF, the PMP process is the key to understanding what is important.

Select those that are most important• What are the “High Impact” objectives?• In general,

• Visibility to customers• Complaints concerning quality• Revenue generated• High costs of operations• Desire to understand why product/service is successful• Initiatives to increase market share• Requests to demonstrate service usefulness

Page 17: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

17

Step 2 Describe Products/Services

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 18: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

18

Step 2 (cont.)Describe Products/Services

Some questions to answer:• What categories of products/services are delivered to

customers?• Why are some categories used more than others?

• Has the delivery of products/services increased, decreased, or remained constant?

• Why have these changes occurred?• Are particular NIH ICs using the product/service more than

others?• If so, why?

• Who is ordering, receiving, and using the products/services?

• Do your IT systems provide enough information to answer these questions?

Page 19: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

19

Step 2 (cont.)Graph what You Deliver to Customers

Example 2-1 • Division of Veterinary Resources (DVR) Procurement Orders

Processed by Customer and Fiscal Year

Example 2-2• Categories of Products Ordered from MAPB by Fiscal Year

Example 2-3• NIH Transhare Participants by Month

Example 2-4 • FY04 Flow Chart of the Division of Radiation Safety Review

of Animal Study Program (ASP) Proposals

Page 20: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

20

Step 2 (cont.)Example 2-1: FY04 DVR Procurement Orders Processed by Customer and Fiscal Year

Procurement Orders Processed by Customer

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

NIAID

NINDS

NICHD

NIMH

NIDDK

NIA

NHLBI

NIDA

NIDCR

NHGRINEI

NCI

NIDCD

NIAAA

NIAM

S CCORS

NCCAM

IC

Nu

mb

er o

f R

un

s

FY02 FY03 FY04

Page 21: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

21

Step 2 (cont.)Example 2-2: Categories of Products Ordered from MAPB by Fiscal Year

Page 22: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

22

Step 2 (cont.)Example 2-3: NIH Transhare Participants by Month

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Oct

. 03

No

v. 0

3

De

c. 0

3

Jan

. 04

Fe

b. 0

4

Ma

r. 0

4

Ap

r. 0

4

Ma

y.0

4

Jun

. 04

Jul.

04

Au

g. 0

4

Se

pt.

04

TranshareParticipants

Page 23: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

23

Step 2 (cont.)Example 2-4: FY04 Flow Chart of the DRS Review of ASP Proposals

Page 24: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

24

Step 3 Identify Customer Segments

Page 25: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

25

Step 3 (cont.)Identify Customer Segments

Segmentation means to sort customers into groups based on similar characteristicsCritical to the viability of service organizationsSegmentation allows understanding of the differences in customer groups

• What they like - what they don’t like• How to tailor service offerings to better meet needs of

each group

By identifying and tracking customer segments over time

• Determine which segments are most profitable to target and retain

• Determine which segments to deemphasize

Page 26: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

26

Step 3 (cont.) How do I Segment my Customers?

Use existing data to understand: • Type of products/services used• Quantities of use• Customer’s organization• Customer’s function• Other demographic variables

• Location• Type of business• Delivery schedule

Page 27: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

27

Step 3 (cont.) Graph Data to Understand Customer Segments

Example 3-1• Library Translation Customers by Fiscal Year

Example 3-2• FY04 Division of International Services (DIS) Visas

Processed by Type

Page 28: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

28

Step 3 (cont.) Example 3-1: Library Translation Customers by Fiscal Year

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Customers

No

. of

Tra

nsl

atio

n J

ob

s C

om

ple

ted

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004

Page 29: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

29

Step 3 (cont.) Example 3-2: FY04 DIS Visas Processed by Type

5 3 63138 99

16

616

0

2543

852 60 82 45

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

A-1

A-2

B-1

EA

D

F-1

G-4

H-1

B I

J-1

J-2

L-1

O-1 TN

WB

Type

Nu

mb

er p

roce

ssed

Page 30: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

30

Step 4Conduct Needs Assessment

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 31: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

31

Step 4 (cont.)Conduct Needs Assessment

Existing data may not reveal what matters most to customers

• Providing what customers really need vs. providing what you think customers need

Needs Assessments allow you to learn more about your customers

• First review data from prior steps• Look at additional sources – e.g. complaints, stakeholder

input, data showing a particular service is over/under-used• Develop list of questions• Gather data via:

• Targeted interactions• Interviews• Focus Groups

• Survey of customers

Page 32: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

32

Step 4 (cont.)Conduct Needs Assessment (cont.)

• Example 4-1• FY04 Animal Program Advisory Committee (APAC) Feed and

Bedding Focus Group• Example 4-2

• FY04 Scientific Equipment and Instrumentation Branch (SEIB) Needs Assessment survey

Page 33: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

33

Step 4 (cont.) Example 4-1: APAC Feed and Bedding Focus Group (Slide 1 of 3)

Division of Veterinary Resources (DVR) Basic Animal Life Support Service Group analyzed data regarding its feed and bedding processes

• FY02 and FY03 data suggested that the acquisition and storage of feed and bedding products as well as the quality assurance testing of these products should be further examined – especially with respect to customer needs

• A focus group was held with APAC members in FY04 to gather data on customer needs

Page 34: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

34

Step 4 (cont.) Example 4-1: APAC Feed and Bedding Focus Group (Slide 2 of 3)

• A structured series of questions were asked of members and action items generated based on the data gathered

• Is the current ordering process for feed and bedding products working? Explain.

• Currently how confident are you that you can get feed and bedding when you need it?

• Have you had problems related to the delivery of feed and/or bedding?

• Have you found the OLAO staff to be responsive to your needs?

• Have you had ongoing issues related to the quality of either the feed or bedding products delivered?

• Do you think NIH should continue to do additional quality assurance checks on feed and bedding products beyond the tests run by the manufacturers?

Page 35: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

35

Step 4 (cont.) Example 4-1: APAC Feed and Bedding Focus Group (Slide 3 of 3)

• When you have a quality issue, do you contact Dennis Barnard in DVR or do you contact OLAO staff or both?

• Would you find it helpful to have all issues about feed and bedding be handled by one person in DVR? Why or why not?

• Some organizations eliminate their warehousing function as a way to reduce costs, and receive their supplies directly from vendors just-in-time – meaning they receive the products just as they are ready to use them. How would you feel about going to such a system for animal feed and bedding products? Explain.

• Customer input verified necessity of current acquisition and storage procedures

Page 36: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

36

Step 4 (cont.) Example 4-2 : FY04 SEIB Needs Assessment Survey

Survey was designed to determine the need for instrument design and fabrication services among NIH intramural Principal Investigators (PIs)

What was discovered:• About 90% of all intramural PIs completed the survey• 34% of PIs expressed a need for instrument fabrication and

design services• Almost half of all jobs are urgent or emergencies • About 40% of PIs used outside sources for design and

fabrication work

Page 37: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

37

Step 4 (cont.) Example 4-2 : FY04 SEIB Needs Assessment Survey (cont.) Do you require any of the following services for instrument fabrication and design?

175873

278

615

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

No Need forInstrumentFabricationand Design

Apparatus thatis not

commerciallyavailable

Design ofexperiment-

specificapparatus

Repairs ormodificaitonsto customer

builtequipment

Helpdevelopingengineering

specificationsfor commercial

apparatus

Nu

mb

er

of

Resp

on

den

ts

N = 93534% expressed need for instrument fabrication and design (N=320)

66% expressed no need

Note: Multiple responses possible in last four categories. 172 respondents skipped this question.

Page 38: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

38

Step 5 Research Competitors

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 39: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

39

Step 5 (cont.)Research Your Competitors

Why should ORS/ORF be the provider of choice?

Ask yourself:• Who else can provide this service?• At what cost can others provide this service?• What does ORS/ORF offer that is unique or valued

compared to competitors?• What do competitors offer in terms of features and amenities

that are not offered by ORS/ORF?• What distinguishes you from your competitors?• What are you doing to increase market share?

What is the value proposition for your service area?

Page 40: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

40

Step 6 Select Measures

Page 41: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

41

Step 6 (cont.)Typical Balanced Scorecard Customer Measures

Customer satisfaction• How well meeting needs and satisfaction with specific

performance criteria

Market share• Proportion of business in market that you provide to

customers

Customer retention• Do you maintain ongoing relationships with customers and

retain their business

Customer acquisition• Rate at which you attract new customers

Customer profitability• Net profit of a customer segment accounting for unique

expenses to support that customer

Page 42: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

42

Step 6 (cont.)

Some Advice About “Measures”

Rarely can you gather data and use it directly to gauge performance

• Data needs to be collected, transformed, analyzed, summarized, and displayed

Most measures are calculated based on a series of raw data metrics

• Customer satisfaction may be the overall satisfaction score on a 20 question survey

• Market share may be combination of percentage of market for variety of products/services

• Customer retention may be combination of retention of many different customers, segments

There is no one “right” measureBe flexible to change measures

• Example 6-1• FY05 Division of Facilities Planning (DFP) Customer Scorecard

Page 43: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

43

Step 6 (cont.)Example 6-1: FY05 DFP Customer Scorecard

5

6

7

8

9

10

Reliability

Equitability

Anticipating Needs

Timeliness

Responsiveness

Competence

Handling of Problems

Overall Mean

AccommodatingIC Facility Needsin NIH MasterPlans

Determining ICMid-Range FacilityRequirements

DevelopingPlans/Proposalsfor New NIHFacilities

Guidance on ICShort-RangeSpace Needs

CoordinatingCommunity andOutside AgencyReviews

Note: Though the rating scale ranges from (1) Unsatisfactory to (10) Outstanding, only a portion of the scale is shown for greater clarity

Outstanding

Page 44: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

44

Step 7Plan Data Collection

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 45: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

45

Step 7 (cont.)THINK Before you Act!

• Data collection is a time consuming activity

• Gathering data from customers raises their expectations

• Only collect the amount of data you can analyze and respond to in timely fashion

• Garbage in = Garbage out

Page 46: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

46

Step 7 (cont.) Methods for Collecting Data

Existing Data

Observation

Interviews and Focus Groups

Surveys

Page 47: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

47

Step 7 (cont.) Existing Data (cont.)

Financial data, ordering data, delivery data, complaints data

Steps to using existing data:• Select appropriate data• Define data into measures• Determine computational procedures to use measures as

information

Example 7-1• Scientific Equipment Instrumentation Branch (SEIB) Rental

Revenue by Fiscal Year

Page 48: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

48

Step 7 (cont.) Example 7-1: SEIB Rental Revenue by Fiscal Year

$-

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04

Page 49: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

49

Step 7 (cont.) Existing Data - Advantages

• Easy to gather

• Doesn’t require involving the customer

• Often viewed as “objective” or “real”

• Can be summarized over time

• Allows quick review of current situation

• Typically used to convince management that something needs to change

Page 50: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

50

Step 7 (cont.) Existing Data - Disadvantages

• Quality of the data may be poor - not recorded in consistent fashion

• Data may be incomplete

• Extraction of data may be time consuming

• Not collected with analysis in mind

• May have limited usefulness

Page 51: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

51

Step 7 (cont.) Observations

• Simple to do

• Great reality check on how things really happen

• Very useful to understand new features, amenities you could provide

• Example 7-2• FY05 Security Guard Observations of Wait Times for Vehicle

Security Checks

Page 52: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

52

Step 7 (cont.) Example 7-2: FY05 Security Guard Observations of Wait Times for Vehicle Security Checks

Page 53: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

53

Step 7 (cont.) Observations - Advantages

• Yield real time data

• Provide understanding of context

• Outsiders can be used so data has little bias

• See things that escape notice in general course of work

• Access to information people may not want to discuss in interviews

Page 54: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

54

Step 7 (cont.) Observations - Disadvantages

• Can be costly if have to train observers

• Limitations due to people’s concerns about anonymity and being observed

• Presence of observer may influence process

• Can be hard to code and analyze

Page 55: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

55

Step 7 (cont.) Interviews and Focus Groups

Difference• Interviews are conducted with individuals• Focus groups consist of multiple participants

Good for collecting qualitative data• Information not readily categorized and coded• Explore why customers feel they way they do

Questions are usually open-ended in nature• Let customers respond in their own words• Provides insight into customer perceptions

Example 7-3• FY03 ORS Financial Management Branch (FMB) Customer

Interviews

Page 56: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

56

Step 7 (cont.) Example 7-3: FY03 ORS FMB Customer Interviews (Slide 1 of 4)

• Interviews were conducted with representatives in ORS to capture how the ORS Financial Management Branch (FMB) can provide better service to its customers.

• Total of 13 interviews were held and most lasted 1 hour

• Combined open ended questions with a structured survey (ORS customer scorecard)

• Summary of results were compiled

Page 57: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

57

Step 7 (cont.) Example 7-3: FY03 ORS FMB Customer Interviews (Slide 2 of 4)

How the results were used:• FMB took action to clarify its role, especially in the budget

reporting process• FMB was able to partner with Divisions and become a better

advocate for them with OFM• Results helped reaffirm FMB’s commitment to a customer

service mentality.

Page 58: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

58

Step 7 (cont.) Example 7-3: FY03 ORS FMB Customer Interviews (Slide 3 of 4)

Open Ended Questions:• Business plan formulation questions

• How well do you think the current business plan formulation process works?

• What specific ideas do you have to improve the process?• What tools or services could the FMB provide to assist you in

this process?• Budget execution questions

• Do the current reports and information you receive meet your needs to track your budget obligations/accruals/expenditures?

• How could the reports/information be modified so you would NOT have to manipulate it to use it?

• How much has timeliness and accuracy of budget execution information been an issue for you?

Page 59: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

59

Step 7 (cont.) Example 7-3: FY03 ORS FMB Customer Interviews (Slide 4 of 4)

Open Ended Questions (cont.):• Central Services Questions to be Asked

• Do the current Central Services reports and information you receive meet your needs to track your budget obligations/accruals/expenditures?

• What specific ideas do you have on how we provide this information to you in a useful manner and timeframe?

• Questions for Rate Study Customers • What services does the Budget and Finance group currently

provide for your rate studies? • What could we do to improve our service to you in this area?

• General • Do you have any additional specific ideas on how the Budget and

Finance Service Group can improve our service to you?

Page 60: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

60

Step 7 (cont.) Interviewing is a Skill

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 61: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

61

Step 7 (cont.) Interviews/Focus Groups - Advantages

• Allow flexibility in data collection

• Can gather unexpected data and ask unplanned questions

• Provide more complete customer perspective

• Facilitate communication and customer relations

• Useful for generating ideas for improvement

• Allow for problem-solving during the actual meeting

Page 62: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

62

Step 7 (cont.) Interviews/Focus Groups - Disadvantages

• Require skilled interviewers or they can backfire

• Produce results that can be difficult to analyze and interpret with assistance

• Can produce biased results

• Social desirability or peer pressure (focus groups) can be influential

Page 63: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

63

Step 7 (cont.)Surveys

• Doing a good survey is NOT simple• Obtaining useful information requires skill and practice

• The method (e.g. doing a web survey) is just part of the process

• Need to consider issues of anonymity and confidentiality

• There is no “magical” number of questions

• Response rates are key to evaluating surveys -- how the data can be used

• Don’t do a survey unless you plan to act on the results

Page 64: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

64

Step 7 (cont.)Components of a Survey

• Introduction• Reasons for survey• Guaranteeing anonymity• Instructions

• Survey Questions• Satisfaction surveys• Needs assessment surveys• Climate surveys

• Comments• Offer respondents chance to comment

• Closing• Thank you• Assurance that results will be made available

Page 65: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

65

Step 7 (cont.)Introduction

• Introduction• Example 7-4

• FY05 Division of Facilities Planning Customer Scorecard

Page 66: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

66

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-4: FY05 Division of Facilities Planning Customer Scorecard

Introduction

• The Division of Facilities Planning in the Office of Research Facilities is gathering customer feedback on the planning services it provides ICs so that we know how to better satisfy your needs. Each IC is being asked for one response representing the consolidated views of the IC. Your responses will be combined with the responses of others and analyzed by the Office of Quality Management in the Office of Research Services. Thus the information you provide will remain anonymous. Please take a few minutes to complete this survey.

Page 67: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

67

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Customer Satisfaction Surveys

• Customer Satisfaction Dimensions• Common satisfaction dimensions apply to all/most Service

Groups• Use these dimensions whenever possible• Advantage: Allows OQM to roll-up ratings across Service

Groups• Example 7-5

• ORS Customer Scorecard

Page 68: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

68

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-5: ORS Customer Scorecard

Customer Satisfaction Dimensions

Please rate your SATISFACTION with <Service Group or Product Name> on the following:

Unsatisfactory Outstanding

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Product/Service

Cost 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/AQuality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/A

Timeliness 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/AReliability 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/A

Customer Service

Availability 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/AResponsiveness 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/A

Convenience 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/ACompetence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/A

Handling of problems 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D/K N/A

Don't Know

Not Applicable

Page 69: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

69

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Satisfaction Surveys

• Satisfaction With Specific Performance Aspects• Satisfaction ratings may be obtained on any aspect of

service or product performance• Work with OQM to define questions• Example 7-6

• FY05 Space Administration and Finance Branch (SAFB) Consolidated Statement of services (CSS) survey

• Example 7-7• FY05 Division of Radiation Safety Laboratory Transfer survey

Page 70: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

70

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-6: FY05 SAFB CSS Survey

Other Types of Satisfaction QuestionsAnswer the following questions regarding the NIH Rent Program section of the CSS.Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.

Product/Service 1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

Rent data are accurate. 1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

Adjustments are understandable. 1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

TIA financial data are accurate. 1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

The NIH Occupancy Agreement is useful. 1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

Neither agree nor disagree

Strongly agreeDisagree Agree

Don’t know

Not Applicable

Strongly disagree

Please answer the following question for the CSS overall.

Product/Service 1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

There has been improvement in the FY05 CSS over the FY04 CSS.

1 2 3 4 5 DK NA

AgreeStrongly

agreeDon’t know

Not Applicable

Strongly disagree Disagree

Neither agree nor

Page 71: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

71

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-7: FY05 Division of Radiation Safety Laboratory Transfer Survey

Other Types of Satisfaction Questions

Please rate the helpfulness of the information provided to you in the following areas:

Not at all helpful Extremely Helpful

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Dry and liquid radioactive waste containers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

Empty radioactive waste containers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

Refrigerators and freezers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

Contaminated/labeled equipment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

Transferring/storage of radioactive material 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

Posting of new laboratory spaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

Not Applicable

How helpful was the assistance you received from your Area Health Physicist?

Not at all helpful Extremely Helpful

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Page 72: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

72

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Needs Assessment Surveys

• Frequency of Product/Service Use• Helps prioritize services and/or products already offered• Helps identify outside service provider impact• Example 7-8

• FY04 Scientific Equipment and Instrumentation Branch (SEIB) Needs Assessment survey: Frequency of Product/Service Use

• Example 7-9• FY04 Scientific Equipment and Instrumentation Branch (SEIB)

Needs Assessment survey: Product/Service Use by Service Provider

Page 73: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

73

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-8: FY04 SEIB Needs Assessment Survey

Frequency of Product/Service Use

Is most of your work:

20

135

35

56

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Other

Both

de novo Design

Modification/Repair

N = 246

Typ

e o

f W

ork

Number of Responses

Note: Only answered by those expressing need for instrument fabrication and design services (N=320). 74 respondents skipped this question.

23%

14%

55%

8%

Page 74: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

74

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-9: FY04 SEIB Needs Assessment Survey

Product/Service Use by Service ProviderRespondents were asked to indicate their service providers for Instrument Modification

12 11 11

6 6 6 6 5 4 4 31 1 1

2023

28

44

74

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

ORSSEIB

ComJob

Shops

OtherSource

NIMHNINDS NIA NIDDK NCI NEI NHLBINICHDNIEHSNIAMS CC NIDA NIAIDNIDCRNIAAANIBIB

Nu

mb

er

of

Resp

on

den

ts

Note: Only Service Providers with responses are shown. Multiple responses possible.

N = 266

28% used ORS SEIB

27% used Outside Sources (Commercial

Job Shops or Other Source)

Page 75: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

75

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Needs Assessment

• Determination of Additional Products or Services Needed• Helps determine what additional services or products are in

demand• Example 7-10

• FY05 Information Technology Branch (ITB) Needs Assessment survey: Importance and Criticality Ratings

• Example 7-11• FY05 Information Technology Branch (ITB) Needs Assessment

survey: Importance and Criticality Classification• Example 7-12

• FY05 Information Technology Branch (ITB) Needs Assessment survey: After Hours Support Use

Page 76: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

76

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-10: FY05 ITB Needs Assessment Importance and Criticality Ratings

Importance Ratings• For each application used by an Office/Division,

respondents were asked to rate the importance of having after hours support for the IT application.

• The scale ranged from (1) Not Important to (10) Very Important.

Criticality Ratings• For each application used by an Office/Division,

respondents were asked to rate the amount of time that their business operation could tolerate (i.e., operate effectively) when the application is not fully functional.

• The scale included 5 choices; (1) 1 hours or less, (2) 2 – 4 hours, (3) 4 – 8 hours, (4) 8 – 12 hours, and (5) 12 hours or more.

Page 77: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

77

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-11: FY05 ITB Needs Assessment Importance and Criticality Classification

ImportanceC

riti

calit

y

High Medium Low

High

CPR Training – Online RegistrationFilemaker Pro 5.5Laboratory SafetyNIH ShuttleOnline InterpretiveDOES Automated InspectionsParking and Transhare

Andover ContinuumDIS Training SystemAO Services System

Dynamic SurveySPSS and Survey DevelopmentBldg 10 RevitalizationDPPA SurveyJJ Keller RevitalizationLeased PropertyORF – IBC Training RegistrationORF Training Registration

Medium

Remedy ITB Help Desk Remedy Change ManagementCRISBITSRemedy KnowledgebaseNIH CensusOSISPosted Space ApplicationSpace Justification Log

Project Server 2003ORS Services AdministrationRemedy DPS Training AppRemedy Facility RiskWeapons InventoryVRP Billing SystemARCHIBUSCalendar Module

Low

DPPA Time ManagementQualtraxORF Reference Library

Capacity ManagementRationalRadiation Safety Irradiator

Remedy Web ClientCATWebOBSF Business ToolORS Training RegistrationVSOF

Note ORF Applications in red font

Page 78: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

78

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-12: FY05 ITB Needs Assessment After Hours Support Use

Respondents were asked to estimate how many times they would have called ITB for support during the past 6 months had they been available during specific time frames. Results are ordered by frequency from heaviest use to lowest use.

65

41

2519 17

14 13 13 10 107

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

After Hours Use

Nu

mb

er o

f Res

po

nd

ents

Page 79: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

79

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Climate Surveys (Slide 1 of 3)

• Climate • Climate is defined as the practices and procedures in an

organization that connote or signal to people what is important (Schneider, 1975)

• Climate has been shown to promote a variety of positive internal organizational outcomes such as employee satisfaction, employee productivity, employee turnover, and employee use of training

• Climate has also been shown to promote a variety of positive external organizational outcomes such as increased production and customer satisfaction

• Work with OQM to define climate dimensions and questions that are appropriate for your Service Group

Page 80: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

80

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Climate Surveys (Slide 2 of 3)

• Climate Dimensions• Typical dimensions include policies, practices, and procedures

related to• Management

• Mission/vision clarity and relationship to customer• Supervisory practices• Performance measurement

• Communication • Among Service Group employees• Between Service Groups• Between senior management and Service Groups

• Teamwork• Among Service Group employees• Between Service Groups

• Training• Are employees trained?• Do employees use the training they have received?

• Rewards• Are employees rewarded for good performance• Is good performance tied to mission, customer expectations, etc.

Page 81: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

81

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Questions: Climate Surveys (Slide 3 of 3)

• Climate Examples• Example 7-13

• FY04 Division of Events Management Climate Survey• Example 7-14

• FY04 Division of Employee Services (DES) Worksite Enrichment Climate Survey

• Example 7-15• FY04 Office of Quality Management (OQM) Performance

Management Survey

Page 82: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

82

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-13: FY04 Division of Events Management Climate Survey

Management Dimension: Ratings by Question and Type of RespondentRespondents were asked to rate the extent of their satisfaction on the following climate aspects.

2.29

2.17

3.43

2.86

3.71

3.71

4.22

3.77

1 2 3 4 5

Long-term quality improvement goals are establishedand integrated into DEMS overall strategic planning

and budgeting processes

Short-term quality improvement goals areestablished and integrated into DEMS overallstrategic planning and budgeting processes

I understand how my job contributes to DEMSmission, vision, and values

DEMS has a well-defined mission, vision, and values

NIH EmployeeContract Employee

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

Mean Response

N = 7N = 23

N = 7N = 23

N = 6N = 23

N = 7

N = 23

Man

agem

ent

Qu

esti

on

s

Page 83: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

83

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-14: FY04 DES Worksite Enrichment Climate Survey

Respondents were asked to rate the extent of their satisfaction on the following climate aspects.

Clim

ate

Asp

ect

7.38

7

6.89

6.44

6.33

7.33

7.11

7.33

7.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Physical environment (e.g., safety)

Respectful treatment by others

Fair and equitable treatment by others

Information on schedule or location of others

Information received to keep abreast of variousprograms

Information received concerning changes within NIH

Feedback on work activities

Communication with supervisors/managers

Communication with peers

Unsatisfactory Outstanding

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

Page 84: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

84

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-15: FY04 OQM Performance Management Survey

Respondents were asked to rate the extent of their agreement with the following statements

4.15

3.56

3.21

3.84

3.70

3.50

4.03

3.59

1 2 3 4 5

Actively Involved inData Collection

PM Assist with A-76

PM Contributed toImprovements

Accountability is anImportant Value

Results-OrientedCulture

I Understand ServicesHierarchy

Committed to PM

See Value of PM

Clim

ate

Asp

ect

Strongly Disagree

Neither Agree nor Disagree

Strongly Agree

N = 40

N = 39

N = 40

N = 40

N = 39

N = 40

N = 40

N = 40

Page 85: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

85

Step 7 (cont.)Types of Survey Questions

• Demographic questions• Example 7-16

• FY04 Division of Events Management Climate Survey

• Yes/No questions• Example 7-17

• FY04 Division of Employee Services (DES) Worksite Enrichment Customer Survey

• Check all that apply questions• Example 7-18

• FY04 Division of Employee Services (DES) Worksite Enrichment Customer Survey

Page 86: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

86

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-16: FY04 Division of Events Management Climate Survey

Demographic Questions1. Which best describes you? Place “X” next to choice. _____NIH Employee _____Other 2. What is your primary location? Place “X” next to choice. _____NIH Bethesda Campus _____Off NIH campus in Washington DC Metro Area _____Other Location 3. How long have you been a Federal Government employee (excluding military

service)? Place “X” next to choice. _____1 – 5 years _____6 – 10 years _____11 – 15 years _____16 – 20 years _____21 – 25 years _____26 – 30 years _____More than 30 years _____Not Applicable (N/A) 4. What is your grade level? Place “X” next to choice. _____5 – 7 _____8 - 10 _____11 - 13 _____14 - 15 _____Senior Executive Service (SES) _____N/A

demographic questions allow you to view results by type of respondent

Page 87: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

87

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-17: FY04 DES Worksite Enrichment Survey

Yes/No Questions

During the past 6 months, did you purchase food or drink at an NIH dining center (located in Bldgs 1, 10, 12B, 38A, 40, Natcher, EPS, NSC, Rockledge I and II)? _____Yes (survey skips to next service area section) _____No (survey skips to new web page -- Why haven’t you used

an NIH dining center during the past 6 months?)

In general, yes/no questions should be avoided unless you use them to stratify responses (e.g., exclude those respondents who answer “no”, or view results by whether respondents chose “yes” or “no” to certain qualifying question)

Page 88: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

88

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-18: FY04 DES Worksite Enrichment Survey

Check All That Apply Questions

Why haven’t you used an NIH dining center during the past 6 months? (Check all that apply) _____No need _____Didn’t know existed _____Costs too much _____Low quality _____Limited hours of operation _____Inconvenient _____Customer service is unresponsive

In general, check all that apply questions should be avoided unless you’d like to examine responses collectively irrespective of the number of respondents

Page 89: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

89

Step 7 (cont.)Comments

• Comments• Are examples of open-ended questions• Always provide an opportunity for respondents to comment• Providing a structured way for respondents to comment is

helpful to focus comments on important areas• Example 7-19

• ORS Customer Scorecard• Other open-ended questions

Page 90: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

90

Step 7 (cont.)Example 7-19: ORS Customer Scorecard and Other Open-Ended Questions

• ORS Customer Scorecard Questions• What was done particularly well?• What needs to be improved?• Other comments?

• Other Open-Ended Questions• Are there any additional services or amenities would you like to see

added? • If the Division of Employee Services could do one thing to improve

the quality of your work life, what would it be?• Is there any additional training that you would find beneficial?• Do you have any comments on how we can improve our business

planning process?

Open-ended questions provide a good source of ideas on how to improve

Page 91: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

91

Step 7 (cont.)Closing

• Closing• Thank you• Assurance that results will be made available• Examples

• Thank you for your time. We will post survey results on our website <website location> and notify you when the results are available.

• Thank you for your feedback.

Page 92: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

92

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Sampling and Administration

• Sampling is for statisticians• Define population/sampling frame/actual sample• Plan for post-stratification weighting procedures

• Administration• Web surveys are the way to go

• Authentication• Respondent control• Branching• Data validation

• Point of sale surveys• Don’t necessarily generalize to the larger population• Good for tapping current customers• Effective method to solicit improvement ideas

• Mail surveys

• Response rates and incentives

Page 93: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

93

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Tips (Slide 1 of 6)

• Rating Scales• Typical rating scales vary from 5 to 10 rating choices• There is no one “correct” or “best” rating scale• Even numbers of rating choices discourage “fence sitters”

(e.g., neither agree nor disagree)• There is no need to label each and every rating point on a

scale. It is often sufficient to label only the low end and high end of a scale

• The ORS Customer Scorecard uses a 10-point rating scale• The larger number of points are useful to ensure a greater

amount of variation among responses• Useful when respondents are closely bunched on one end of the

scale or the other• A greater amount of variation is useful when making

comparisons (e.g., among types of respondents, over time, etc.)• In general, use a 10-point scale when possible

Page 94: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

94

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Tips (Slide 2 of 6)

• Don’t Know and Not Applicable• Typical rating scales allow respondents to choose “Don’t

Know” or “Not Applicable”• Include these choices unless you are absolutely sure that

respondents have no reason to choose one or the other• When these choices are not available on a survey you may

find an inordinate number of questions are not answered. You’ll have no idea why.

Page 95: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

95

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Tips (Slide 3 of 6)

• Pitfalls of Yes/No Questions• Avoid using Yes/No questions• Use Yes/No questions only when the answer is used for the purpose

of stratifying responses or branching.• Answer will be used to compare answers of respondents who chose

“yes” to those who chose ”no” on some other dimension• Answer leads to different path on survey.

• Inappropriate• Reviews are timely ___Yes ___No• Your Area Health Physicist was helpful ___Yes ___No

• Better• How timely were our reviews? Use a rating scale from (1) Not at all

Timely to (10) Extremely Timely. Include “Don’t Know” and “Not Applicable”.

• How helpful was the assistance you received from your Area Health Physicist? Use a rating scale from (1) Not at all Helpful to (10) Extremely Helpful. Include “Not Applicable”.

Page 96: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

96

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Tips (Slide 4 of 6)

• Soliciting Respondents Name/Email address• Always make this optional• Can be useful depending on purpose of survey

• Needs assessment surveys • Allows you to get back to respondent with specific information at

his/her request• In general, avoid asking for this information

• Most respondents uncomfortable• Results no longer anonymous

Page 97: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

97

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Tips (Slide 5 of 6)

• Survey Frequency• Needs assessment surveys

• A one-time survey• Customer satisfaction and climate surveys

• Dependent on size of customer pool, results, etc.• Do not want to over-survey• In general, every 2 years may be just about right• Point-of-sale or contact surveys

• Survey all customers for a short period of time, several times per quarter

• Survey every nth customer on an on-going basis

Page 98: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

98

Step 7 (cont.)Survey Tips (Slide 6 of 6)

• Sharing Results• Make sure to share results with stakeholders

• Senior ORS/ORF leaders• Service Group team members• Customers (respondents)

• Promotes positive relationship with customers• Encourages sharing of ideas with customers• Provides means to educate customers on Service Group

capabilities

Page 99: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

99

Step 7 (cont.)Surveys - Advantages

• Used to gather large amounts of data quickly

• Permit anonymity - thus honest feedback

• Use sampling techniques so don’t bother customers

• Provide results that generalize to larger population of customers

• Data can be summarized and analyzed using statistical tests

Page 100: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

100

Step 7 (cont.)Surveys - Disadvantages

• Not as flexible as interviews/focus groups

• Raise customer expectations that things will improve

• Low response rates and non-response bias can lead to faulty conclusions

• Data gathered may not generalize to larger population

• Expensive in terms of development, administration, analysis

Page 101: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

101

Step 7 (cont.)Get Assistance from OQM

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 102: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

102

Step 7 (cont.)Data Collection Plan

• * Use the template(s) available to help you define your measures• Measure Roadmap, or• Data Collection Plan

• Templates walk you through the measurement definition and collection process and specify,…..• performance measure link to objective• methodology used for data collection• ownership of measure• source of data• frequency of data collection• targets

* Available at http://www.nih.gov/od/ors/od/oqm/pm/index_pm.htm and described in Managing With Measures, June 2004

Page 103: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

103

Step 8 Gather and Analyze Customer Data

Page 104: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

104

Step 8 (cont.) Steps in Gathering Customer Data

Steps to Gather Customer Data• Pilot test data collection tools• Determine dates and locations for data collection• Publicize data collection effort (if relevant)• Start data collection period• Collect the data• Provide follow-up reminders if applicable• End data collection period• Enter data into the appropriate IT system• Check/transform the data as needed• Analyze the data and product summary graphs, charts,

tables

Page 105: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

105

Step 8 (cont.) Analyzing Customer Data

• There are generally two types of data: quantitative and qualitative

• Analyzing data is not simple – contact OQM for assistance• There is both an art and a science to analyzing data• Compare yourself over time or to others to better understand

your results• Highlight similarities and differences• Categorize findings in a way that tells a story• Do NOT report all the data -- be selective

Page 106: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

106

Step 8 (cont.) Analyzing Data is a Skill

Page 107: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

107

Step 8 (cont.) Types of Charts and Graphs

• Pie Charts• Example 8-1

• FY04 Bioengineering and Physical Science Collaboration Needs Assessment

• Bar Charts• Example 8-2

• FY05 Support Foreign Staff Exchange Program Division of International Services (DIS) Visiting Program Participant Survey

• Example 8-3• FY04 Office of Research Facilities Senior Leadership Survey

• Line Graphs• Example 8-4

• FY04 ORS Customer Scorecard Roll-up Results

Page 108: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

108

Step 8 (cont.) Types of Charts and Graphs (Cont.)

• Pareto Charts• Example 8-5

• FY04 Office of Quality Management (OQM) Performance Management Survey

• Gap Analysis• Example 8-6

• FY03 Library Translation Services Customer Scorecard

Page 109: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

109

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-1: FY04 Bioengineering and Physical Science Collaboration Needs Assessment

Pie Chart: Respondent Characteristics - Tenure

Less than 1 Year N = 12

3%

1 - 5 Years N = 4612%

More than 5 Years N =

31385%

N = 371

Page 110: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

110

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-2: FY05 DIS Visiting Program Participant Survey

Bar Chart: Satisfaction – Reliability Frequency of Response

0 1 1 0 13

12

20

24

4

1

45

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK NA

Fre

qu

en

cy

of

Re

sp

on

se

N = 112

Mean = 8.77

Median = 9

Unsatisfactory Outstanding

83%15%2%

Page 111: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

111

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-3: FY04 Office of Research Facilities Senior Leadership Survey

Bar Chart: Satisfaction With Service Areas by Organization

7.43

6.00

7.71

6.83

7.60

7.33

5.62

6.20

6.88

5.37

5.89

4.78

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Long Term Stewardship

Property Management (Leased)

** Property Management (federally owned)

Development (Leased)

Development (federally owned)

Master & Facilities Planning

NIH Office of the Director

Institute or Center

Unsatisfactory Outstanding

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 9

N = 27

N = 27

N = 27

N = 27

N = 26

N = 27

** Groups significantly diff erent (p < .01)

Page 112: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

112

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-4: FY04 ORS Customer Scorecard Roll-up Results

Line Graph: Satisfaction - Mean Convenience Ratings

N = 13

Mean = 8.50

Median = 9.00

8.75

7.256.85

7.61 7.71

8.759.18 9.19

8.70

10.009.93

7.23

8.49

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1 2 *3 4 5 7 10 11 *13 14 **15 **16 **18

Service Group

Me

an

Ra

tin

g

Service Group Mean Rating Overall Mean Rating

Outstanding

Unsatisfactory

* Group significantly different from mean (p < .05) ** Group significantly different from mean (p <.01)

Page 113: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

113

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-5: FY04 OQM Performance Management Survey

Pareto Chart: Satisfaction - Mean Convenience Ratings

7.97 7.827.15

6.52 6.45 6.38 6.29 6.25 6.18 6.06 6.00 5.88 5.86 5.74

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Not at all

Helpful

Extremely

Helpful

Page 114: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

114

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-6: FY03 Library Translation Services Customer Scorecard

Gap Analysis: Satisfaction and Importance Ratings

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

Satisfaction

Imp

ort

ance

NOT SATISFIED, IMPORTANT

NOT SATISIFIED, NOT IMPORTANT

SATISFIED,IMPORTANT

SATISFIED, NOT IMPORTANT

Data based on 70 respondents

Note: The Importance rating scale ranges from 1 - 10 where “1” represents Unimportant and “10” represents Important. The Satisfaction rating scale ranges from 1 - 10 where “1” represents Unsatisfactory and “10” represents Outstanding.

Page 115: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

115

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-6: FY03 Library Translation Services Customer Scorecard (cont.)

Gap Analysis: Satisfaction and Importance Ratings–A Closer Look

7.00

7.50

8.00

8.50

9.00

9.50

10.00

7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00

Satisfaction

Imp

ort

an

ce

SATISFIED,IMPORTANT

Cost

Convenience

Responsiveness

AvailabilityHandling of Problems

Competence

QualityTimeliness

Reliability

Data based on 70 respondents

Note: A smaller portion of the chart is shown so that the individual data points can be labeled.

Page 116: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

116

Step 8 (cont.) Data Over Time

• Example 8-7• FY05 Division of Facilities Planning Customer Scorecard

• Example 8-8• FY04 ORS Customer Scorecard Roll-up Results: Overall

Service Group Satisfaction Means by Fiscal Year

• Example 8-9• FY04 ORS Customer Scorecard Roll-up Results: Percentage

Change in Overall Customer Satisfaction

Page 117: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

117

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-7: FY05 Division of Facilities Planning Customer Scorecard

Satisfaction Ratings by Fiscal Year

8.00

8.00

7.53

7.38

7.17

7.79

7.17

6.67

6.75

6.33

6.90

6.92

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Competence

Responsiveness

Timeliness

Anticipating Needs

Equitability

Reliability

FY04

FY05

Unsatisfactory

Outstanding

Sati

sfa

cti

on

D

imen

sio

n

N = 14

N = 16

N = 15

N = 16

N = 15N = 16

N = 15

N = 16

N = 15N = 16

N = 15N = 16

Note: There are no significant differences between the groups

Page 118: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

118

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-8: FY04 ORS Customer Scorecard Rollup Results

Overall Service Group Satisfaction Means by Fiscal Year

8.57

6.74

7.417.71

7.366.95

9.598.98

6.96

9.54

8.52

7.13

5.62

4.75

5.5

9.11

7.637.36

8.76

7.52 7.52

7.447.32

9.31

7.176.74

9.46

8.268.66 7.89

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

**1 2 **3 **4 **5 6 12 *13 14 *17 *18 19 *20 21 22

Service Group

Me

an

Ra

tin

g

Time 2

Time 1

* Group significantly different from Time 1 (p < .05) ** Group significantly different from Time 1 (p <.01)

Page 119: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

119

Step 8 (cont.) Example 8-9: FY04 ORS Customer Scorecard Rollup Results

Percentage Change in Overall Customer Satisfaction%

Change in

Overa

ll C

ust

om

er

Sati

sfact

ion

Mean

R

ati

ng

1% 1% 1% 3% 5%

20% 20%

3%

-4%

40%

3%

56%

-5% -3% -2%

-75%

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

12 14 22 6 2 19 21 *17 *18 *20 *13 **1 **3 **5 **4

Service Group

Appendix shows Service Group number mapping* Significant change (p < .05) ** Significant change (p <.01)

Page 120: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

120

Step 9 Discuss Findings and Recommendations

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 121: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

121

Step 9 Discuss Findings and Recommendations (cont.)

• Data not worth anything if not reviewed for findings and recommended actions

• If issues are identified, some kind of action is imperative• Customers share dissatisfaction and nothing happens --

organization has failed them twice

• Actions can be thought of as service recovery• Recovery can impact tremendously on satisfaction and

loyalty• In general customers have basic expectations

Page 122: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

122

Step 9 Basic Expectations of Customers Regarding Service

• Customer Expectations• Be competent• Explain things• Be respectful• Keep me informed• Be on my side• Play fair• Protect me from catastrophe• Keep your promise• Fulfill obligations• Learn my business and work with me• Share my sense of urgency• Be competent• Be prepared• Be flexible

Source: Parasuraman, Berry, & Zeithaml, 1991.

Page 123: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

123

Step 9 Interpreting Findings

Page 124: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

124

Step 9 Tips for Interpreting Data

• Try to see the forest through the trees

• Organize your data and findings to tell a story

• Get front-line employee involved

• Involve customers if they are willing

• Organize findings to report both good news and areas for improvement

• Develop a presentation summarizing the measurement process, method, findings, and recommendations

Page 125: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

125

Step 10 Take Action

© 2001 The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 126: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

126

Step 10 Take Action (Cont.)

• Taking action is the bottom line• If nothing else -- you must provide feedback to

customers on findings• Won’t cooperate with future data collection• May negatively impact on their image of you

• Balanced Scorecard approach encourages integrating customer data into strategic planning process• Customer data is KEY ingredient in way the organization

does business• Customer data should DRIVE organizational improvement

• Remember that improvement is a process• Outstanding service doesn’t come over night• It’s not impossible• Just takes commitment to customer satisfaction and quality

Page 127: Customer Assessment Office of Quality Management Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health October 2005.

127

Conclusion

• Customer Assessment is essential to measuring the impact of your strategy• Meant to be used in conjunction with the other perspectives

of your PMP

• The 10 steps are a guideline to get you started• Customer data helps you answer the question, “How

well do I deliver on my “value proposition”?