Curriculum Review 2014 Performance vs proficiency
-
Upload
michelle-olah -
Category
Education
-
view
15 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Curriculum Review 2014 Performance vs proficiency

Curriculum Reveiw Workshop
2014
Seminole County Public Schools


Learning Goal:
Teachers will be able to evaluate the current curriculum in relationship to Standards and Proficiency based instruction and assessment in order to improve teaching practice and increase student proficiency in World Languages learning.


What are Standards?
Content Standards (NGSS Standards for World languages)• What should students know and be able to do?
Performance Standards• How can students show they are achieving the content standards?
Proficiency Standards• How well are students achieving – how can we measure progress
over time?
Program Standards (district curriculum and resources) • When? Where? Who? – the elements of program design
State Standards: Connecting a National Vision to Local Implementation (PDF) by Paul Sandrock, ACTFL
5

How to find Language Goals for Each Course Level:
1.Go to Cpalms (http://www.cpalms.org )
2.Read FLDOE Course Description
3.Find PROFICIENCY level expected in that level
4.Understand Performance and Performance indicators for each level

Proficiency Vs. PerformanceProficiency
• to communicate meaningful information
• in spontaneous interaction
• understandable to native speakers
• does not mean perfection
Performance
• performance in familiar contexts
• practiced and rehearsed
• connected to specific curriculum

Florida World Languages
Standards are based on
PROFICIENCY levels

Proficiency Levels
What are the proficiency levels?Novice
Intermediate Superior
Advanced

Proficiency Levels

Proficiency is like…Pizza
Novice
Superior
Advanced
Intermediate

Proficiency is like…Pizza
You start eating at the point of the pizza and there’s really
not much there.
When you start learning a language there’s very little you
can do with the language because there’s not much there.

Proficiency is like…Pizza
The farther up the pizza slice you eat, the more there is to eat.
The more language you learn, the more you can do with the language.

Proficiency is like…Pizza
Some people eat the crust and some don’t.
Some people speak language at the superior level, and some never achieve
that (even in their native language).

Proficiency is like…Pizza
Some people eat a cheese pizza, others eat pepperoni, while others eat only
veggies, and that’s ok.
When it comes to learning a language, not everyone learns the same vocabulary, and that’s ok, too.

Proficiency Levels Defined

Expected Proficiency Levels for Florida
Level 1: Novice Mid - Novice High
Level 2: Intermediate Low-Mid
Level 3: Intermediate High-Advanced Low
Level 4: Advanced Low-Advanced Mid
Novice low Novice Mid Novice High Intermediate Low
Intermediate Mid
Intermediate High Advanced Low Advanced Mid
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 4

Proficiency Sublevels
LOWa baseline performance for the level; sustained but skeletal for the level; “Just hanging on”MID (the largest sublevel)solid performance for level; quantity/quality for the level; may have some features of the next level
HIGH
sustained performance close to the next major level

Proficiency Sublevel Differences
• Differences between low and mid is the quantity and quality with the same function
• Differences between mid and high is not being able to sustain criteria for the next level


ACTFL Proficiency and Performance Descriptions
http://actflproficiencyguidelines2012.org/
http://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/PerformanceDescriptorsLanguageLearners.pdf

The Modes of Communication – critical to understanding the standards
Interpersonal
Interpretive
Presentational

Interpersonal CommunicationStudents engage in conversation, provide and obtain information, express feelings and emotions, and exchange opinions.
1.The active negotiation of meaning among individuals
2.Participants observe and monitor one another to see how their intentions and meanings are being communicated
3.Adjustments and clarifications can be made accordingly.
4.Participants need to initiate, maintain, and sustain the conversation

Interpersonal communication
Is NOT ISOne-way communication Two-way exchange
Memorized (dialogues) Spontaneous (and unpredictable)
Only asking (all) the questions
Helping each other
Strict turn taking Following up and reacting; maintaining the conversation
Ignoring your partner; waiting to say something
Indicating interest: interactive body language, eye contact
Overly concerned about accuracy
Focusing on the message
Giving up when you don’t understand
If communication fails/falters, asking for clarification

Interpretive CommunicationStudents understand and interpret written and spoken language on a variety of topics
1.The interpretation of meaning, including cultural
2.The source is something heard, read, or viewed
3.No opportunity to interact with the writer, speaker, or producer
4.The task is to try to understand the gist and as many layers of details as possible

Interpretive communication
Is NOT IS
Translation Context-driven understanding (gist)
Hunt for trivial details Whole picture; mediating meaning with the text; focused task
Glossed readings; teaching all new vocabulary first
Familiar words in new context; and new words in a familiar context (authentic)
Reading, listening or viewing from the reader's perspective only
Use the author’s perspective and cultural perspective
Reading word for word Re-phrasing chunks, retelling; predicting; using the structural clues

Presentational CommunicationStudents present information, concepts, and ideas to a audience of listeners or readers on a variety of topics
1.The creation of messages2.The message may be delivered via
writing, speaking or visually presenting
3.No immediate opportunity to interact with the reader, listener, or viewer
4.The creator of the message needs to be aware of the audience and how to make an impact on that audience

Presentational communication
Is NOT ISNegotiated communication
One-way communication
Random Practice, rehearsed, polished (or on demand)
Unplanned Organized
Speaking or writing in a vacuum
An awareness of audience (formal/informal; cultural context)
Reliance of circumlocution Improved with dictionary and spell-check tools
Talking or writing only for the teacher
Maintaining attention of intended audience

We need to make sure ALL standards and
ALL modes of communication are
addressed in our curriculum

What is working?What are we currently emphasizing in curriculum?What do we need to do more of?What do we need to do less of?
Task #1 – Look at our current curriculum guide

Works CitedACTFL PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS FOR LANGUAGE LEARNERS. Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, 2012. Print.
"ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines." ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines.
Sandrock, Paul. Through World Languages: Developing Literacy through Language Learning. N.p.: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, n.d. PDF.
Sandrock, Paul. The Keys to Assessing Language Performance: A Teacher's Manual for Measuring Student Progress. Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, 2010. Print.
Swender, Dr. Elvira. "ACTFL Proficiency Levels in the Work World." Proc. of CIBER 2012 Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 5-16. Print.