Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE · 10/5/2017 · Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE ......

10/5/2017 CC Agenda 1

Curriculum Committee of

MERCED COLLEGE

3600 M Street, Merced, California 95348‐2898

(209) 384‐6364

SIGN‐IN SHEET

DATE: September 28, 2017

MEMBERS:

Area 1, Cohort A Lisa Diaz Noncredit Director Janet Lyle

Area 1, Cohort B Katherine Schroeder

Counseling Cindy Hardcastle

Area 2, Cohort A Janee Young LRC Dee Near

Area 2, Cohort B Denise Rempel Articulation Officer Greg Soto

Area 3, Cohort A Tim Donvoan Senate President Julie Clark Area 3, Cohort B Scott McCall SLO Coordinator Val Albano

Area 4, Cohort A Caren Col‐Hamm VPI Brian Ellison

Area 4, Cohort B Patty Eighmey Dean, Area 1 Doug Kain

Area 4, Cohort C Sue Norris Dean, Area 5 John Albano

Area 5, Cohort A Jennifer Gardner ASMC Rep Mariah Gill

Area 5, Cohort B Carin Heidelbach SSSP Director Raul Alcala

Distance Ed Rep Ray Latham Recorder Gabriela Garcia

Researcher Luis Flores Office of Instruction Teresa Gudgel

A/R Diane Spork A/R Andrea Garibay

GUESTS:

10/5/2017 CC Agenda 2

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING

THURSDAY October 5, 2017; 11:00 am – 12:50 pm

Student Union Meeting Room – 137 and Los Banos – B119

AGENDA:

1) CALL TO ORDER 2) AGENDA 3) INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS 4) PUBLIC COMMENTS 5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF September 21, 2017

6) CONSENT AGENDA I

a) Course Modification(s) b) SLO Update(s) c) Title 5 Course Review(s) d) CTE 2 Year Review(s) e) Distance Education

7) COMMITTEE REPORTS

A. Articulation B. IPRSLOAC C. Distance Education

8) BUSINESS:

A. FIRST READING: Administrative Procedure defining Merced College’s Credit Hour and

the relationship of hours and units awarded

B. FIRST READING: Learning Community (LC) Evaluation Guidelines for LC’s having reached the end of the 6‐year cycle

C. ACTION: Approval of First‐time Learning Community ENGL/PHIL 13 and GUID 45 to be offered in spring 18

D. INFORMATION: Update on Math changes and concerns regarding articulation timelines

E. INFORMATION: Cabinet has selected eLumen to replace CurricUNET as Merced College’s Curriculum Management System

10/5/2017 CC Agenda 3

F. TASK FORCE: Creation of Task Force to review Merced College’s process for special topics courses

G. ACTION: Call for nominations for Curriculum Chair (Fall 18‐Spring 2020)

9) C‐ID UPDATE

10) Chancellor’s Office Updates

11) ANNOUNCEMENTS/CALL FOR AGENDA ITEMS Next Curriculum Committee Meeting:

October 19, 2017 11:00 am – 12:50 pm SU – 137 and Los Banos – B119

Agenda items are due Wednesday, October 11, 2017 by 5:00 pm to Myshel Pimentel.

12) ADJOURNMENT

Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE

MINUTES UNAPPROVED

Thursday, September 21, 2017 11:00 am‐12:50 pm, SU 137

MEMBERS:

Area 1, Cohort A Lisa Diaz Present Noncredit Director Janet Lyle Present

Area 1, Cohort B Katherine Schroeder Absent Counseling Cindy Hardcastle Present

Area 2, Cohort A

LRC Dee Near Present

Area 2, Cohort B Denise Rempel Present Articulation Officer Greg Soto Present

Area 3, Cohort A Tim Donovan Present Senate President Julie Clark Present

Area 3, Cohort B Scott McCall Absent SLO Coordinator Valerie Albano Absent

Area 4, Cohort A Caren Col‐Hamm Absent VPI Brian Ellison Absent

Area 4, Cohort B Patty Eighmey Present Dean, Area 1 Doug Kain Absent

Area 4, Cohort C Sue Norris Present Dean, Area 5 John Albano Present

Area 5, Cohort A Jennifer Gardner Present ASMC Rep Mariah Gill Present

Area 5, Cohort B Carin Heidelbach Present SSSP Director Raul Alcala Absent

STAFF:

Distance Ed Rep Ray Latham Present Recorder Gabriela García Present

Researcher Luis Flores Present Office of Instruction Teresa Gudgel Present

A/R Diane Spork Present A/R Andrea Garibay Present

GUESTS:

1) CALL TO ORDER

Myshel Pimentel called the meeting to order at 11:03 am.

2) AGENDA 3) INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS

None

4) PUBLIC COMMENTS None

5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF September 9, 2017 Approve the September 9, 2017 minutes

M: D. Near S: G. Soto Y: 14 N: 0 A: 0

6) CONSENT AGENDA I

a) Course Modification(s) b) SLO Update(s) c) Title 5 Course Review(s) d) Program Modification(s)

e) Special Topic Julie Clark pulled DRAM 70N because she stated that it needs to be put in a family and there are issues with repeatability. Discussion occurred about how other community colleges handle these courses. After discussion, the course will be added to the Acting family. For now since the repeatability issues are not addressed in an official document, the course will be approved. Special Topics courses will be re‐visited at a future meeting when all interested parties are present for discussion. Approve DRAM 70N


Approve the rest of Consent Agenda 1


Title 5

M: G. Soto S: C. Heidelbach Y: 13 N: 0 A: 0

7) COMMITTEE REPORTS

A. Articulation Greg is continuing to clean up the courses in ASSIST. He projected the proposal status part of ASSIST and talked about some of the courses he is concerned about. Greg asked members to contact him if they submitted any courses for articulation in 2015, 2016, or 2017 and have not heard back on the status of the courses so that he can check what happened.

B. IPRSLOAC No Report

C. Distance Education Next meeting is September 22 at 10am in LRC‐157.

8) BUSINESS:

A. ACTION: Amend 2017‐18 DE‐Approved Course list to include VIRT 55 (approved as DE in

2014) Approve item 8A

M: D. Near S: P. Eighmey Y: 13 N: 0 A: 0

B. ACTION: Request to approve Title 5 CTE 2 Year Review for EMER 52 and amend minutes

from 12/01/16 As Myshel was going through CurricUNET, she realized that when Brian brought EMER 52 through it should have also been for a Title 5 CTE 2 Year Review but she only had it

on the agenda as an SLO update. She now would like to amend the minutes to reflect this.

Approve item 8B

M: G. Soto S: S. Norris Y: 13 N: 0 A: 0

C. ACTION: First Time Learning Community Request: ENGL 13 (#4392) and GUID 45 (#4480) The committee would like the faculty to reconsider this learning community because they feel these courses are not a good fit for pairing and it would not in the best interest of students since GUID 45 is not transferrable to the UC, and most students who take ENGL/PHIL 13 are UC bound.

M: D. Near S: S. Norris Y: 12 N: 0 A: 1

D. Rempel

D. DISCUSSION: Finalize pros and cons of new curriculum management system based on

demonstrations from eLumen and DigArc to forward to Cabinet Myshel went through her list of pros and cons and added feedback from the committee. She will finalize the list and send it to Arlis. Cabinet will be making the final decision on which system to purchase.

E. INFORMATION: Update from math faculty on the progress for the revised math

sequence Lisa presented the math pathways the math department is planning to implement. The goal is to implement this in Fall 2018. All the courses will be submitted in CurricUNET on September 30. Curriculum committee members asked a lot of questions and had suggestions on what the department can do to be prepared to address concerns as this moves forward.

9) C‐ID UPDATE Greg was able to get a log in reset for C‐ID so now he can start checking these courses.

10) Chancellor’s Office Updates Teresa is still having issues with the Chancellor’s Office submissions but she is trying to get that figured out.

11) ANNOUNCEMENTS/CALL FOR AGENDA ITEMS Next Curriculum Committee Meeting:

October 5, 2017 11:00 am – 12:50 pm SU – 137 and Los Banos – B119

Agenda items are due Wednesday, September 27, 2017 by 5:00 pm to Myshel Pimentel.

12) ADJOURNMENT

Meeting adjourned at 12:48 pm.

Voting Records 09/21/17 Y=Aye, N= No, A=Abstain; Members in italics

were absent.

Name Item 5 Item 6 ‐

Drama

70N

Item 6 ‐

Rest of

Consent

Agenda

Item 6 ‐

Title 5

Item

8A

Item

8B

Item

8C

1A Lisa Diaz Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

1B Katherine Schroeder

2A

2B Denise Rempel Y Y Y Y Y Y A

3A Tim Donovan Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

3B Scott McCall

4A Caren Col‐Hamm

4B Patty Eighmey Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

4C Sue Norris Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

5A Jennifer Gardner Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

5B Carin Heidelbach Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Noncredit Janet Lyle y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Counseling Cindy Hardcastle Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

LRC Dee Near Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

AO Greg Soto Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

SP Julie Clark Y

SLO Coordinator Val Albano

VPI Brian Ellison

Dean Doug Kain

Dean John Albano Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

ASMC Rep Mariah Gill Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

SSSP Director Raul Alcala

CONSENT AGENDA I: September 21, 2017

# COURSE

PROPOSAL TYPE CHANGES

EFFECTIVE DATE NOTES

1

BIOL 09 MODIFICATION

Revise Course Outline SLO Update Remove Requisites Title 5 Review SUMMER 2018

Remove Prerequisites BIOL‐01 or BIOL‐02 or BIOL‐04A.

2

BIOL 50 MODIFICATION

Revise Course Outline Title 5 Review SUMMER 2018

Update Texts Update Activities

#

PROGRAM(S) PROPOSAL

TYPE CHANGES EFFECTIVE

DATE NOTES

3

Foods and Nutrition AA (13160.AA) MODIFICATION

TITLE CHANGE: Nutrition and Foods Update PLOS Elective Courses Changed SUMMER 2018

ADD NUTR 24, 50 ,60, 70A‐ZZ, and AOM 30 since it is cross‐listed with CPSC 30 Remove NUTR 26A‐C

4

Foods & Nutrition CL DRAM 70(13160.CL) MODIFICATION

TITLE CHANGE: Nutrition and Foods Elective Courses Changed Update PLOS SUMMER 2018

ADD NUTR 24, 50 ,60, 70A‐ZZ, and AOM 30 since it is cross‐listed with CPSC 30 Remove NUTR 26A‐C

#

PROGRAM(S) PROPOSAL

TYPE CHANGES EFFECTIVE

DATE NOTES

5

DRAM 70N SPECIAL TOPICS FALL 2017

Topic/Theme: Styles Acting (.5 unit/Lab) Umbrella Course: DRAM 70AA‐ZZ Courses Related in Content:

Consent Agenda 10/05/2017


#

COURSE PROPROSAL TYPE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES/REQUESTS EFECTIVE DATE

NOTES

1

AGRI 10 CTE 2 Year Update Text; Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18

2 ANSC 12 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18



5

ANSC 16 CTE 2 Year Update Text Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18

6

ANSC 17 CTE 2 Year Update Text; Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18

7

ANSC 18 CTE 2 Year Update Text; Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18


9 ANSC 30 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18

10


11


12

ANSC 10 MODIFICATION

C‐ID: AG 104 Updated SLOs Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E Edited Objectives Revised COR (Updated Assignments, Activities, Methods, & Content) SU 18

Re‐submit for C‐ID

13 LAND 10A CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18

14 LAND 10B CTE 2 Year Update Text/Materials SU 18


15 LAND 11 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18







22

HIST 09A (Introduction to East Asian Civilization: China) MODIFICATION

Course Title Change: China: Introduction to East Asian Civilization Update Texts SLO Update SU 18

23

HIST 09B (Introduction to East Asian Civilization: Japan) MODIFICATION

Course Title Change: Japan: Introduction to East Asian Civilization Update Texts SLO Update Revise Course Outline SU 18

24

FIRE 73A (Fire Prevention I) MODIFICATION

Course Title Change: Fire Inspector 1A Change Description Update Texts Update SLO Title 5 Revise Course Outline SU 18


25

FIRE 73B MODIFICATION

Course Title Change: First Inspector 1B: Fire and Life Safety Update Requisites SLO Update Change Description Title 5 Review Update Texts Revise Course Outline

SU 18

26

CLDV 10 NEW

Title: Strategies for Working with Challenging Behaviors

(3 Unit Lecture); Advisories: ENGL 85A, 85AC, and E

Requesting CSU Transfer

Requesting DE Status

Justification: The CA Dept. of Education has asked TK teachers to obtain 24 units of

child development by 2020. Additionally, our local MCOE Special Education

Workforce, Mentors, and ECE Teachers have vocalized the need for a challenging

behaviors course to meet the needs of children in our county. SU 18

27

MECH 12 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E Updated Textbooks SU 18

28

MECH 13 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E Updated Textbooks SU 18

29

MECH 15 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E Update Textbooks SU 18

30



31

MECH 22A CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E Update Textbooks SU 18

32


33


34


35

MECH 27 CTE 2 Year

Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E ADD MATH 80 Advisory Update Textbooks SU 18

Added MATH 80 advisory as OR w/ MATH 85

36


37


38


39


40


41

MECH 51 CTE 2 Year

Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E ADD MATH 80 Advisory Update Textbooks SU 18



42

MECH 70 AAZZ CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E ADD MATH 80 Advisory SU 18


43

MECH 71 CTE 2 Year Update Requisites to include ENGL 85A, 85AC, 85E SU 18

Academic Senate of MERCED COLLEGE

3600 M Street Merced, CA 95348-2898 Telephone (209) 384-6095

RESOLUTION First Reading:

Second Reading/Action (Date): Pass/Fail

RESOLUTION NO.

Subject: ___AP Credit Hour ____________________________ Mover: Myshel Pimentel Division/Area: Curriculum Chair

Seconder: Caren Col-Hamm Division/Area: Allied Health

Whereas Merced College has established consistent practices for awarding units of credit based on a relationship between units and hours and has consistently applied those practices in determining the number of units awarded per course; Whereas California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 55002, requires creation of a formal calculation document to define the relationship between units and hours as part of the College’s curriculum development and approval process; Therefore be it resolved Merced College Curriculum Committee recommends that the Academic Senate recommend adoption of the Administrative Procedure Credit Hour to the Board of Trustees.

AP: Credit Hour

Merced College grants units of credit for courses based on a relationship between the number of units

and the number of hours as identified on the Course Outline of Record (COR). The table below shows

the relationship of in‐class hours and expected outside‐of‐class hours for each instructional category

offered at Merced College.

Instructional Category In‐Class Hours Outside‐of‐Class Hours

Lecture (Lecture, Discussion, Seminar, & Related Work)

1 2

Laboratory (Traditional Lab, Natural Science Lab, Clinical, & Similar)

3 0

Work Experience

1 unit of semester credit shall equal 75 paid hours work experience.

OR 1 unit of semester credit shall equal 60 non‐paid hours work experience. (§ 55256.5. Work Experience Credit)

To determine the Units of Credit for a course,* Merced College will utilize the formula:

[Total Contact hours + Outside‐of‐Class Hours] = Units of Credit

Hours‐per‐unit Divisor

Because Merced College follows an 18‐week semester, the Hours‐per‐unit Divisor is 54. For example, a

course that meets for 3 hours each week would have 6 additional outside‐of‐class hours each week. The

formula to determine the Units of Credit for this course is as follows:

(54 + 108)/54 = 3 units of credit

The Course Outline of Record (COR) shall indicate the In‐Class Hours, Outside‐of‐Class Hours, and the

Total Student Learning Hours. Short‐term offerings of courses should adhere to the same hour/unit

calculation as the 18‐week equivalent course.

Merced College may elect to award credit in increments of .25 but not less than .5. For example, a

course may be 2.25 units, but cannot be less than .5 units in total. When increments are utilized, the

College cannot award credits unless the total student learning hours have reached the minimum

threshold for that number of units. If application of the aforementioned formula resulted in 3.33 units of

credit, the highest number of units the College could award for the course is 3.25. In order to reach 3.5

units, the College would need to adjust the hours for the course.

The instructional categories defined above and the units of credit calculations are specific to the units a

student can be awarded for a Merced College course and should be separated from faculty workload

considerations.

Definitions for terms used above:

Total Contact Hours: The sum of hours in a given term that a student is under the direct

supervision of a professor or other qualified employee as defined in Title 5, 58050‐58051.

Outside‐of‐Class Hours: The sum of hours in a given term that students are expected to engage

in coursework outside of the classroom. Standard practice in higher education is that for each

hour of lecture or related course format, students should spend two hours outside of class. All

other course formats, including laboratory, activity, clinical, studio, etc. must provide an

equivalent number of Total Student Learning Hours. The ratio of in‐class to outside‐of‐class time

should be defined appropriately for the instructional category and should fall adhere to

standard practices in higher education.

Total Student Learning Hours: The sum of Total Contact Hours and Outside‐of‐Class Hours in a

given term.

Title 5: 55002, 55002.5, 55256.5, 58050‐58051

*This applies to all Merced College courses except cooperative work experience courses. Cooperative

Work Experience courses will adhere to the hour requirements as define in Title 5, 55256.5.

Academic Senate of MERCED COLLEGE

3600 M Street Merced, CA 95348-2898 Telephone (209) 384-6095

RESOLUTION First Reading:

Second Reading/Action (Date): Pass/Fail

RESOLUTION NO.

Subject: ______Learning Community Evaluation Process and Guidelines ________________________ Mover: Myshel Pimentel Division/Area: Curriculum Chair

Seconder: Division/Area:

Whereas Academic Senate Resolution 2-10 identifies Learning Communities are a proven method for increasing student success and are an effective method of staff development for faculty; Whereas Administrative Procedure 4260.II.C.3 states that Learning Communities will be assessed at the end of every 6-years of offering; Whereas Merced College does not currently have established guidelines in place for the assessment of Learning Communities; Therefore be it resolved that Merced College Learning Communities adhere to the evaluation guidelines as established by the Merced College Curriculum Committee.

Learning Community Review Guidelines

Recommendations for the Review Process:

1. The assessment will be completed by the faculty and dean(s) involved in

the Learning Community. The Office of Institutional Effectiveness (OIE) will

assist with the assessment.

2. The assessment will occur at the end of the semester for which the

Learning Community pairing is up for review. Only Learning Communities

that have been offered for six years will be assessed.

3. The results of the assessment will be reviewed by the dean(s) and faculty

teaching in the learning community. If the Learning Community crosses

areas, both deans will participate in the review in the discussion.

4. A follow‐up report will be generated at the conclusion of the review by deans and faculty that includes a brief description of the discussion that

ensued, any recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the

learning community, and a decision to continue/not‐continue offering the

learning community.

There are three possible outcomes of the review:

i. Continue the Learning Community without Modification;

ii. Continue the Learning Community with Modification;

iii. Discontinue the Learning Community.

If the outcome of the review is to continue the Learning Community with

Modification, possible recommendations to strengthen a Learning Community

may include, but are not limited to:

iv. Staff Development

v. Improved Scheduling

vi. More Effective Advertising

vii. Other 5. A report generated by OIE will be sent to the Curriculum Committee as an

informational item upon conclusion of all Learning Community reviews

each semester in which Learning Community pairings are evaluated. This

report will be a general report that includes a summary of all learning

communities evaluated, not singling out any one Learning Community

Pairing.

6. Subsequent Reviews: a. If the Learning Community is deemed effective, the next review will

occur after the next 6 years of offering.

b. If recommendations are made to increase the effectiveness of the

learning community, a follow‐up review will occur after 2 more years

of offering the community.

Assessment Tools:

1. For the purpose of evaluating a Learning Community, success and

completion rates will be measured against the average of the non‐Learning

Community sections of the course. Institutional benchmarks for success

and completion will be used to guide the review.

2. A student survey will also be completed to help gauge the effectiveness of

the Learning Community. (See survey questions in Appendix A).

Identification

This survey is specifically about your experiences with Learning Communities at Merced College.

* 1. Are you a faculty member who taught a Learning Community or a student who enrolled in a Learning

Community?

Student Faculty member

Students' Feedback

The following questions are specifically about your student experience with Learning Communities

at Merced College.

2. Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements about the registration process:

Strongly

Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree N/A

The registration process

to enroll in all Learning

Community courses was

easy.

The registration process

to enroll in all Learning

Community courses was

successful.

Comments

3. Indicate your level of agreement to the following statement about teaching and collaboration:

Strongly


Collaboration across

courses existed.

Teaching was effective

across courses.

Assignments were

aligned across courses.

Connection was

improved between

faculty members and

students.

Your academic and

social opportunities were

enhanced.

You were more involved

in the learning

environment when

compared to non-

Learning Communities.

Comments:

4. How have Learning Communities helped you? [Select all that apply]

Received higher grades

Became a better student

Received valuable feedback

Increased motivation or self-confidence

Increased knowledge in specific areas

Learned better study skills

Learned better time management skills

Provided different point of view or

perspective

Provided a study partner(s)

Other (please specify)

Supplemental Questions

5. Indicate your level of satisfaction with Learning Communities and Merced College, overall.

Very unsatisfied Unsatisfied

Neither satisfied

or dissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied

Don't

know/Decline to

state

Learning Communities

Merced College

6. Revisiting: Would you plan on re-enrolling in a Learning Community in future semesters?

Yes No Don't know/Decline to state

Comments:

7. Which of the College's other student support centers have you visited? [Select all that apply]

Math Lab

Study Central

Tutorial Center

Library

Computer lab

Never visited

8. Location: Where do you, generally, take most of your classes? [Select one]

Merced Campus

Los Banos Campus

Off-Campus Locations

Distance Education/online

Commented [MP1]: ADD ILC

Faculty Members' Feedback

The following questions are specifically about your faculty member experience with Learning

Communities at Merced College.

9. Indicate your level of agreement to the following statement about teaching and collaboration.

Strongly


Collaboration between

faculty members existed.

Teaching was effective

across courses.

Assignments were

aligned across courses.

Connection was

improved between

faculty members and

students.

Students' academic and

social opportunities were

enhanced.

Students were more

involved in the learning

environment when

compared to non-

Learning Communities.


10. In your opinion, how have Learning Communities helped students? [Check all that apply]

Received higher grades

Became a better student

Received valuable feedback

Increased motivation or self-confidence

Increased knowledge in specific areas

Learned better study skills

Learned better time management skills

Provided different point of view or

perspective

Provided a study partner(s)


11. In your opinion, how have Learning Communities helped you as an instructor?

Additional Comments

12. Comments: Is there any thing else you would like to add regarding Merced College's Learning

Communities?

End

Thank you for your participation. Your responses will help the Merced College Office of Student

Equity and Success help plan and improve the Learning Communities program.

For more information about Learning Communities, click here.

Sincerely,

Michael McCandless

Dean of Student Equity and Success

[email protected]

(209) 384-6107

ROUTING PROCEDURE: 1st Proposing Faculty > 1st Discipline Area’s Dean > 2nd Discipline Area Dean > Director of Student Success > Research Analyst > Curriculum Chair if needed or send back to Director of Student Services

OFFICIAL MERCED COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FORM

LEARNING COMMUNITY

OFFICE OF INSTRUCTION/#3101/REVISED, OCTOBER 2016

FIRST TIME LEARNING COMMUNITY Click circle of form submitting REOCCURRING LEARNING COMMUNITY Submit 1 Year in Advance Submit 1st week in April for Spring – 1st Week of December for Fall

Linked Courses to be offered: Semester Year

Yes No 1st Proposing Discipline Faculty Area FT PT Prior Experience with L/C's

Course Name Section No. Day(s) Time Units

Yes No 2nd Proposing Discipline Faculty Area FT PT Prior Experience with L/C's


Yes No 3rd Proposing Discipline Faculty Area FT PT Prior Experience with L/C's


The following signatures give approval for the above Learning Community based upon verification that content review procedures were applied in compliance with Title 5, Section 58106, and Merced College Administrative Procedure 4260 II.C.3

Dean of 1st Proposing Discipline Faculty (Print Name)

Area Click below to Submit

To:

Signature

Date

Dean of 2nd Discipline Faculty if different from the 1st (Print Name)

Area

Signature

Date

Director of Student Success (Print Name)

Signature

Date

Research Analyst (Print Name)

Signature

Date

Curriculum Chair (Print Name)

Signature

Date

of 2

OFFICIAL MERCED COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FORM

LEARNING COMMUNITY

OFFICE OF INSTRUCTION/#3101/REVISED, OCTOBER 2016

Linking Rationale for First Time Learning Community (Enter N/A for Reoccurring)

Schedule Description (First Time and Reoccurring)

Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE · 10/5/2017 · Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE ......

Documents

Transcript of Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE · 10/5/2017 · Curriculum Committee of MERCED COLLEGE ......