Current State of Quality in the Automotive...
-
Upload
trinhduong -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
4
Transcript of Current State of Quality in the Automotive...
Current State of Quality in the Automotive Industry
Scott Gray
Director, Quality Products and Services, AIAG
Agenda
• Survey Demographics
• Top Issues
• Deep Dive on Top Five
– Why is this issue important?
– Level of difficulty to close the gap?
– Level of impact if the gap is closed?
• Key Takeaways
2
Survey Demographics
Good balance across
product commodities
85% of respondents
are from Suppliers
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study 3
Survey Demographics
Feedback from functional
SME’s, Middle Management
and Corporate Executives Approximately one-third from
Engineering, Operations, Sales
and Purchasing functions
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study 4
Current State - Top Issues
5 Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Issues All
Respondents
OEM
Supplier
Problem Solving 1 1 1
Customer Specific Requirements 2 2 2
Quality Management Systems 3 7 3
Product Development 4 5 4
Loss of Experience 5 4 5
Supplier Management 6 3 6
Change Management 7 5 7
Core Tools 8 8 8
Warranty 9 9 9
Metrics 10 10 10
Issue #1 - Problem Solving
6
“Why is Problem Solving important to you?”
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
1. Impacts ability to manage, monitor, and
respond to quality related events
2. Impact ability to implement operational
efficiencies
3. Impacts brand and/or customer relationships
OEM and supplier rankings of the top three reasons why
Problem Solving is important were exactly the same.
Problem Solving
7
What is the risk to the industry if we
don’t improve?
How capable is your company now?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Almost two-thirds of respondents
feel their organizations are at
best Moderately capable at
Problem Solving
More than half of
respondents see significant
risk if no action is taken to
close the gap.
Problem Solving
8
How difficult will it be to close the gap? How much impact if we close the gap?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
OEMs and suppliers almost unanimously agree that
closing the gap is not easy, but doing so would have a
significant level of impact on improving quality.
Problem Solving - Causes
9
Although differences emerge when ranking why
Problem Solving is inadequate, both point to a desire
for a rapid answer, compromising analysis.
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
CAUSE OEM SUPPLIER
Jumping to the Solution 1 4
Root Cause Analysis Lacking 2 1
Management / Organizational Culture 3 2
Rushed 4 3
Lack Prevention through Lessons Learned 5 5
Not Data-driven 6 7
Not Systemic 7 8
Lack Resources 8 6
Issue #2 – CSR’s
10
Why is this issue important?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Reasons OEM Supplier
Impacts ability to standardize business processes and systems
5 1
Impacts ability to manage customer expectations and relationships
1 2
Impacts ability to implement operational efficiencies
3 3
Impacts ability to manage profitability 4 4
Impacts ability to manage, monitor, and respond to quality-related events
2 5
OEM and supplier rankings differed on the top reasons why CSR’s
are important to improving quality
CSR’s
11
Impact from T1 CSR reduction Impact from OEM CSR reduction
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
OEMs and suppliers overwhelmingly agree that the industry would
benefit from a significant reduction in Customer Specific Requirements
CSR’s
12
Respondents also overwhelmingly agree that the degree of
difficulty to minimize CSR’s would be significant
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Issue #3 - QMS
13
Why is this issue important to your company?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Reasons OEM Supplier
Impacts ability to standardize business processes and systems
1 1
Impacts ability to implement operational efficiencies
5 2
Impacts ability to manage customer expectations and relationships
3 3
Impacts ability to mange, monitor, and respond to quality related events
2 4
Impacts ability to manage profitability 4 5
Respondents agree that standardization is the #1 area impacted
by complex and redundant QMS requirements.
QMS – Average Site Impact
14
How many workdays does it take annually
to comply with all QMS requirements?
If complexity and redundancy
were reduced to a minimum, how
many workdays would remain?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Avg. = 116 workdays Avg. = 67 workdays
Opportunity = 2.7M Workdays
QMS – Average Site Impact
15
If complexity and redundancy were
reduced to a minimum, what
approximate expense would remain?
What are your approximate total
expenses related to all the external
audits – certification and customer?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Avg. = $100,225 Avg. = $51,189
Opportunity = $3.5B
QMS
16
Respondents agree on the top actions to improve QMS, and are
aligned on the potential implications if no changes are made
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Top Actions that have the most potential for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of current QMS requirements
1. Reducing TS requirements to only those elements with direct impact on product quality and reliability
2. Determining audit schedules based on performance
3. Combining TS and VDA requirements
Top Issues or Concerns if no change is made
1. The need to maintain multiple systems in support of multiple standards
2. Increase in number of CSR’s (OEM and Tier 1)
3. Poor correlation between certification(s) and actual performance
QMS
17
Impact that could result from
improved standardization and
reduced complexity of standards
and requirements
The level of resistance you
believe would be encountered
in changing current QMS
standards and requirements
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Issue #4 – Product Development
18
Top Reasons Why Product Development is Important
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Reason Total Supplier OEM
Impacts ability to assure product compliance
1 1 1
Impacts ability to manage profitability 2 2 6
Impacts ability to implement operational efficiencies
3 3 3
Impacts ability to drive innovation and collaboration
4 4 2
Impacts customer relationships 5 5 7
Respondents agree that assuring product compliance
is the top reason why this issue is important
Product Development
19
Current level of
capabilities to design,
develop, validate, and
launch new products
effectively.
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Respondents feel their organizations are
capable in product development
Product Development
20
Top sources of
complexity and
risk if no
actions are
taken
Top two
improvement
actions that
should be
pursued
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Improvement Actions OEM Supplier
Design in Quality 1 2
Design for Manufacturability 2 1
Lean Product Development 5 3
System DFMEA 3 4
Design for Six Sigma 4 5
Sources of Complexity OEM Supplier
Unrealistic Specifications 1 1
System validation occurs at launch 2 2
Continuous launch cycles 4 3
Global Platforms 3 4
Advanced technology software 5 5
Issue #5 – Loss of Experience
21
Top reasons this issue important to your company
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Reasons OEM Supplier Total
Impacts ability to avoid repeating past mistakes
5 1 1
Impacts ability to implement operational efficiencies
1 2 2
Impacts ability to develop new talent 2 3 3
Impacts ability to solve problems 2 4 4
Impacts ability to manage, monitor, and respond to quality-related events
2 5 5
Respondents believe this issue will impact their
ability to avoid repeating past mistakes and ability to
implement operational efficiencies
Loss of Experience
22
Over three-quarters of respondents
rate their organizations, at best, as
moderately capable of preserving
and transferring knowledge
What methods do you use to
preserve and transfer knowhow?
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Loss of Experience
23
Level of difficulty to address the
concerns
Risk to the industry if no action is
taken
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study
Respondents overwhelmingly feel that while it is
difficult to address the issue, not addressing the loss
of experience is a significant risk to the industry.
Key Take Aways
• Tough Challenges, Big Rewards
– Significant levels of difficulty will be encountered in driving change, yet all agree significant benefits will result
• Solve the Problem Solving Challenge
– The issue isn’t lack of tools, or skills to use them, the issue is leadership, cross-functional team culture, and discipline
• Standardization. Standardization. Standardization
– Complexity and redundancy drive process/system variation
– Huge amounts of time and money could be saved
• Product Development is key to quality, product compliance
– More emphasis on designing in quality, design for manufacturability needed to address advanced technology and system validation challenges
Source: Deloitte AIAG Quality 2020 Study 24
Quality Survey Partner
• AIAG wants to thank our partner
25
• For their support in getting the survey developed and launched to the industry
• We also appreciate their insights on the analysis and reporting of the results
Closing
Questions?
26