Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social...

6
Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 1 Mohammad Haider Haroon : 10040 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion Disaster in my opinion is a blessing in a disguise. For the very first reason it creates destruction no doubt but on the same side it also provides a window of opportunity to build economies and furthermore social cohesion. Hence in my opinion it’s a situation of mixed bag because it is not necessary that social cohesion will be successful.  So me c han ge s in the e mpl oyme nt str uctu r e of t he region aft er th e e ar th quak e have be en obs e r ve d. F ir s t, af ter the i ntegration of vil lages , th e number of e mploye d h e ads of house hol ds de creased sli ght ly, f r om 187 to 1 64 (Tabl e 4), mos tl y due to r e tir e ment. F e w pr evious ly un e mpl oye d hou s e hold heads now h ave j obs . M oreove r , mos t of t he jobs are now par t-ti me   the av e r age nu mbe r of wor ki ng month s pe r ye ar has fal len f r om ni ne to e igh t. Typicall y, be f ore the e ar th quak e , onl y one pe r s on per f amil y was e mpl oye d. I n th e pos t-di s as ter peri od, howeve r, t he data s how that the number of f amili es with mul ti ple me mbe r s worki ng has ri s en, e s pe cial l y in th e host co mmu ni ty. Th e f i ndi ngs a l s o s ugges t th at the type of employment befor e and af ter th e e art hqu ake has c han ge d. The pe r ce nt age of persons e mpl oye d in t he ag r i cul tu r e s e ctor h as de creas e d in both commu ni ti es . Thi s de cli ne is part i cul ar ly acute in th e r e l ocate d communi ty, due pr imar il y to i ts los s and i ts lim ited ac ce s s to ag ri cult ur al r e s our ce s . Ye t, th e re has be e n an in creas e in the lev e l of e mployme nt of t he hos t communi ty in the publi c and pr ivate sector service industries” (S. Al i B adri , e t al, 2001, 458) The following extract from a research paper done on Iran’s earthquake shows that after the post disaster the economic activity in village has increased in services sector after the collapse of agriculture sector. Previous people who did not have jobs are now employed and are now earning

Transcript of Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social...

Page 1: Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

7/27/2019 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/current-disaster-reconstruction-methods-miss-the-opportunity-to-build-local 1/6

Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 1

Mohammad Haider Haroon : 10040

Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss

the opportunity to build local economies and

social cohesion

Disaster in my opinion is a blessing in a disguise. For the very first reason it creates destruction

no doubt but on the same side it also provides a window of opportunity to build economies and

furthermore social cohesion. Hence in my opinion it’s a situation of mixed bag because it is not

necessary that social cohesion will be successful.

“ Some changes in the employment structure of the region after the earthquake have been 

observed. F ir st, after the integration of vil lages, the number of employed heads of households 

decreased sli ghtly, f rom 187 to 164 (Table 4), mostly due to reti rement. Few previously 

unemployed household heads now have jobs. Moreover, most of the jobs are now part-time  — 

the average number of working months per year has fal len f rom nine to eight. Typically,

before the earthquake, only one person per f amil y was employed. I n the post-disaster period,

however, the data show that the number of famili es with mul tiple members worki ng has risen,

especial ly in the host communi ty. The findings also suggest that the type of employment before 

and after the earthquake has changed. The percentage of persons employed in the agr icul ture 

sector has decreased in both communi ties. Thi s decli ne is particular ly acute in the relocated 

communi ty, due pr imar il y to i ts loss and i ts limited access to agri cultur al r esources. Yet, there 

has been an increase in the level of employment of the host communi ty in the publi c and 

pr ivate sector service industries” (S. Al i Badri , et al, 2001, 458) 

The following extract from a research paper done on Iran’s earthquake shows that after the post

disaster the economic activity in village has increased in services sector after the collapse of 

agriculture sector. Previous people who did not have jobs are now employed and are now earning

Page 2: Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

7/27/2019 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/current-disaster-reconstruction-methods-miss-the-opportunity-to-build-local 2/6

Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 2

money in order for their survival. Although after the massive earthquake struck area in Manjil

with a lot of destruction but on other hand multiple families member got job. One such is

example of honey production in which now more people were involved so that they can earn a

respectable amount of income.

The situation of women in the disaster stricken area of Manjil also shows a positive trend.

Women are now getting more opportunity to work in region after the disaster rather than before.

The very reason is the need. Human recourse is mainly required in the region after the disaster.

Women being the major chunk in the area play a vital role in economic generation but one thing

that comes into hindrance is that they are usually paid less for their work then the man , which in

itself being gender biased but on other hand its better for women to earn something rather than

sitting idle in home.

“Successive governments have been unable to alter local political economies and  thereby 

change signif icantl y the socio-economic and poli tical positi on of the poorest people, in which 

case a partnership seems to be the most positive way to break the cycle. The governments 

would continue to be responsible for the in frastructural elements of coastal management 

thr ough publi c-works programmes and other publi c services. The co-operative NGOs would 

be responsible for car rying out the economic aspects of the anti -poverty programmes, which 

have the possibi li ty of r eaching mi ll ions of people. These programmes are normall y well 

beyond their means. Together these programmes should ensure both protection and reduced 

vulnerabi li ty as well as bringing lasting economic benefi ts in cyclone and f lood-prone coastal 

areas.”  (Peter Winchester, 2000, 34) 

Tropical cyclones and floods usually hit the East coast of India. The above taken paragraph from

a Middlesex University flood hazard research centre shows that after the hitting of cyclones and

floods in the region a lot of destruction takes place. In post disaster scenario, rehabilitation ,

Page 3: Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

7/27/2019 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/current-disaster-reconstruction-methods-miss-the-opportunity-to-build-local 3/6

Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 3

reconstruction plays a very eminent role for a society to get upheaval in economic and social

well being . For these two very reasons the government has decided that NGO sector should

come forward in this regard and help out people living there . It is urged that the NGO s can play

a pivotal role of development in the eastern coastal region of Devi Seema. The poverty can only

 be alleviated by improvement of socio economic resilience of the poor.

Two intermediate-scale NGOs operating in the Krishna delta have joined forces with larger 

 NGOs to carry out projects which neither could do on their own while remaining independent.

The Divi Seema Social Service Society (1977 – 85), run by the Jesuits, and the Salvation Army

(1977 – 82) came to Divi Seema immediately after the 1977 cyclone and worked in the areas with

the highest death tolls on the coastal strip and low-lying inland areas where approximately

25,000 people lived (or one-third of the area’s population). They departed after friction between

their respective head offices and their field operatives. Both organizations established village

credit unions, membership of which gave access to soft loans and subsidized agricultural inputs;

their other programmes covered health-care, adult and nursery education and skills training for a

wide range of self-employment activities. Membership of credit unions was open to everyone,

 but the better-off found the prospect of regular payments and compulsory attendance at meetings

too tedious and the loans and subsidies too small. Nevertheless they did not feel excluded and

consequently did nothing to undermine the programmes. Both NGOs worked with Oxfam and

other international aid agencies on large projects (affecting up to 15,000 people).

With the operation of new NGOs in the region , hence it was now time for people to get benefit

from them and hence provide themselves an opportunity to earn and also gel together socially

 because the activities NGO z are doing will definitely fill the gap of the society and social

cohesion hence will take place .

Page 4: Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

7/27/2019 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/current-disaster-reconstruction-methods-miss-the-opportunity-to-build-local 4/6

Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 4

“In addition to relocating communities to a foreign natural  envi ronment, the resettl ement 

process incited by the buf fer zone has also resul ted in unfavorable social conditions. For 

example, at the Di ckwell a resettlement camp in the Matara distri ct of southern Sr i L anka 

more than1000 people of dif ferent social, economic and cul tur al backgrounds were brought to 

li ve together. This is a drastic change from the small traditional vil lages of a few hundred 

residents where people lived before the tsunami. A sense of community is dif fi cul t to attain in 

large resettlement camps with non-traditional groupings of socioeconomic and cultural 

classes. Thus, community networks, which are crucial f or f osteri ng adaptation and learning 

from a disaster ( Adger et al., 2005; M il ler, 2005  )may have been severely disrupted. A fai lur e 

to address long-term needs such as social and cultur al issues when selecting resettl ement 

camp locations for coastal communiti es has potenti all y made it dif fi cult for people to cope with 

the trauma of the disaster and may increase vulnerability to social conflicts.” (Jane C. Ingram 

et al , 2006, 609) 

The aforementioned extract taken from a research paper done on tsunami stricken Dickwella

resettlement camp in Matara , Srilanka. Here the people of various backgrounds were resettled

after the disaster of tsunami. Unfortunately social cohesion could not take place between

everyone there because the effecters from various nontraditional groupings could not merge

together. Everyone had their differences. It was a difficult job to try to settle more than 1000

 people in one place if they are not willing to live together. Ultimately it was a failure and made

life complex for people to muddle through the trauma of the disaster. For this very reason the

 policy should be made that how the resettlement of the people will be done in order that there is

no issue that they might end up facing while living together. Sustainable livelihood opportunities

must be given to the affected people of disaster stricken region so that they can get involved in

work and engage themselves actively in the society and hence providing economic generation in

the region.

All in all after going through some of the examples regarding the topic I conclude that current

disaster reconstruction although provide a window of opportunity in economic aspects but as far 

as social cohesion goes there is a need bringing such a policy that people struck in disaster region

Page 5: Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

7/27/2019 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/current-disaster-reconstruction-methods-miss-the-opportunity-to-build-local 5/6

Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 5

get an opportunity to amalgamate together so that they can do work collectively as a single unit

hence showing social cohesive bond. A famous saying goes “United we stand and divided we

fall.” This saying is a picture perfect example for the case of this topic.

Page 6: Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

7/27/2019 Current Disaster Reconstruction methods miss the opportunity to build local economies and social cohesion

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/current-disaster-reconstruction-methods-miss-the-opportunity-to-build-local 6/6

Disaster, Vulnerability and Development Page 6

References:

  Disasters, Badr i, E,A(2006) “ Post-disaster resettlement, development and change: a 

case study of the 1990 Manji l Earthquake in I ran ” : Bl ackwell Publi shers,30,4,Oxford and Malden ,458.

  Disasters, Peter Winchester (2000), 24(1) “ Cyclone M iti gation, Resource Al location 

and Post- disaster Reconstruction in South I ndia: L essons from Two Decades of 

Research ” Blackwell Publishers, 24, 1, Oxford and Malden, 34.

  Envir onmental science & poli cy, I ngram E, A (2006) “ Post-disaster recovery 

dilemmas: chal lenges in balancing shor t-term and long-term needs for vulnerabil ity 

reduction ” Ear th institute, 9, Newyork, 609.