Culture Classification: An Analysis
description
Transcript of Culture Classification: An Analysis
Culture Classification:An analysis
Kai Li
Culture Classification
• URL: http://vterrain.org/Culture/culture_class.html
• Designed by Virtual Terrain Project (VTP)• Date: Draft was published in 2002
Domain and Scope
• It is "a complete list of terms which give useful information about the visual appearance of a man-made object on the terrain".– Inductive classification scheme
• Unit: the concept of man-made objects
Domain and Scope (2)
• Specifications:– "objects over a certain size: roughly human-scale
and larger"– "objects which are typically found "outdoors"– "placed upon the terrain, not modifications to the
terrain itself"
Purpose
• One of the purposes of this classification may be to establish a domain map to share with other communities the descriptions of artifacts.– A number of schemata are referenced and
discussed in this classification scheme– Mapping and linking, especially used by Internet
community, will be an increasingly important function of library classification in the future
Structure
• Hierarchical structure. • Structure of the classification:– stationary objects
• apartment building• building• ……• windmotor, wind turbine, wind generator
– mobile objects• amphibious vehicle• ……• space vehicle
Structure (2)
• Structure of the classification:– stationary objects• building
– power plant» subtype necessary to implicate appearance, examples:
nuclear power plant……– religious building
» subtype necessary to implicate appearance, examples: eastern orthodox church
– ……
Structure (3)
• “Is-a” relationship between levels; parallel relationship between terms in the same level.– Terms arranged alphabetically
• “Appearance of the objects” is the only facet in the classification based on the guiding principles:– However, “these may be based on appearance
(visual form), on use, or several other criteria”. (http://vterrain.org/Culture/BldCity/)
Evaluation
• “The hierarchy used here is entirely arbitrary and subjective.”– “Human language concepts are imprecise”– “Categorization is never a simple directed graph”
• Languages:– “How to handle synonyms”– Bias toward American English
Evaluation (2)
• Appearance may not be the best criterion to classify buildings.– Buildings with different functions may or may not
have different appearances• This classification is too simple compared with
the objects it aims to describe.– Inconsistencies in terms of how deep a category
should be divided
Reference
• Virtual Terrain Project. (n.d.). Culture Classification. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from http://vterrain.org/Culture/culture_class.html
Thanks!