Culture and the Individual
description
Transcript of Culture and the Individual
Culture and the IndividualCulture, Anthropology and Psychology
The SelfHistorical Background
Augustine• Single UNIFIED narrative of a life• Inner fragmentation and spiritual reconstruction of self• View of humans as pilgrims seeking salvation for
individual souls• Egalitarian morality, natural rights,
personal liberty• Shift from pagan to Christian• Shift from individual as pawn of society• Shift to individuals as shapers of society• FIRST EVIDENCE in historic writings of self
discovery, self description, self assessment
The Self
Historical Background
Greece & Rome• Identity embedded in ancestry• Self defined by family and kinship relationships• Humanness defined by participation in
community• Privacy and personal gain indicated failure of the
person to be fully human• Greek word that comes closest to self is
“psyche”, which translates as mind or soul that leaves the body at death – no word for self.
The Self
Historical Background
Plato• Introversion as basis for self• Expanded introversion to include lower
and higher parts of the self• Reason and intelligence are higher parts• Passion and emotion are lower parts• Humankind as capable of self-mastery and
actions based on internal reasoning so that reason controls passion and emotion.
The Self
Historical Background
The Renaissance• Move away from individual as a pawn in the
feudal system over which individuals had no control
• Worship of creative genius and independent scholarship as individual accomplishment
• Shift from marriage as a role and duty in a larger family context to romantic love
• Beginning of scientific view of nature as knowable and controllable by humans
The Self
Historical Background
Multiple Perspectives on Self• Montaigne – contradictory nature of self• Hobbes – self pursuing power through
competition and conflict• Descartes – the power of self to think correctly,
to control the self through thought• Hume – self as a non-entity, unbounded,
contradictory, ruled by habit, sensation and desire
• Kant – rationality within self leads to morality
The Self
Historical Background
Protestant and Capitalist Persectives
• Protestant rejection of group oriented, patriarchal church in favor of religious autonomy
• Capitalism based on individual competition
• Entrepreneurism with focus on individual effort
The SelfHistorical Background
Rousseau• Noble Savages
The individual is self sufficient, self-evaluative, self-loving, living in harmony with nature, childlike and pure
With the Division of Labor transformed into• Civilized Humans
Individual is a slave to the power of others, an imitator of fashion who only knows the self through the eyes of others – all self
reflection comes through others
The Self
Historical Background
Hegel’s Spiral (relational) Thesis . . To . . Antithesis . . To . .Synthesis• People want to be autonomous and unique • People only exist in social interaction and are
therefore not either autonomous nor unique• The self is thus socially constructed• The individual is a fleeting moment in the
opposition between personal uniqueness and cultural construction
The Self
Historical Background
Marx (relational)• Materialism, not idealism, is the real focus
of individual identity
• Social class determines individual
• When the proletariat overthrows the capitalists, then “humanity” (not individual humans) will reach its pinacle
The Self as Autonomous Vs Relational
AutonomousRousseau – humans decay when they focus on the relational selfNietzsche – the selves of individuals are struggling to break free from the
controls of othersRelationalUtilitarianism – individuals must yield their own selves for the good of the
groupBentham – athe self is continually exchanging with others to maximize
pleasure and minimize pain.Hegel – People only exist as they struggle between personal uniqueness
and cultural constructionMarx – individuals are a reflection of their social class, based on control
of resourcesWeber – selves learn from their society how to view the worldDurkheim – individuals only exist as part of a superorganic society and
collective consciousnessFreur – self is sexually and aggressively defined by relationships with
others.