Cultue

59
GEERT HOFSTEDE

Transcript of Cultue

Page 1: Cultue

GEERT HOFSTEDE

Page 2: Cultue

G. Hofstede • Professor of Organizational Anthropology and

International Management of Maastricht University• Senior Fellow of IRIC, the Institute for Research on

Intercultural Cooperation, and Extra-Mural Fellow of the CentER for Economic Research, both at Tilburg University

• Occupational activities have varied from sailor, factory worker, industrial engineer, plant manager and personnel director to teacher and researcher at various academic institutions in Europe

Page 4: Cultue

McGraw-Hill, New York 1997

New edition in press 2004 (Hofstede & Hofstede)Translated into Bulgarian,

Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swedish

Older book in ItalianNew edition forthcoming in

Russian

Website www.geerthofstede.nl

Page 5: Cultue

Hofstede Cultural Framework

Page 6: Cultue

What is Culture?

A system of learned values and norms sharedamong a group ofpeople and, whentaken together,constitute a designfor living.

Page 7: Cultue

Values

Abstract ideas about the good, the right, the desirable

Like evil-good, abnormal-normal, dangerous-safe, dirty-clean, immoral-moral, indecent-decent, unnatural-natural, paradoxical-logical, ugly-beautiful, irrational-rational

Page 8: Cultue

Norms

Social rules and guidelines; determine appropriate behavior in specific situations

Folkways: norms of little moral significance–dress code; table manners;

timeliness

Mores: norms central to functioning of social life

–bring serious retribution: thievery, adultery, alcohol

Page 9: Cultue

Definitions of Culture

is…

the unwritten rules of the social game

Culture is the collective programming of the mind, which distinguishes the

members of one human group from another (Hofstede, 1980).

Page 10: Cultue

Why is knowledge of culture important in today’s organisation?

"The world was my oyster, but I used the wrong fork.”

Oscar Wilde

Page 11: Cultue

Culture is more often a source of conflict than of synergy. Cultural differences are a

nuisance at best and often a disaster."     Prof. Geert Hofstede, Emeritus

Professor, Maastricht University.

Page 12: Cultue

Culture Shock Cycle

15-6

Page 13: Cultue

V-for victory in US is obscene in some European countries

Page 14: Cultue

• English-speaking: OK

• France: zero, nothing, worthless

• Japan: money• Brazil & Germany:

vulgar, obscene gesture

Page 15: Cultue

Fingers crossed:

• Europe: good luck, protection

• Paraguay: offensive gesture

Page 16: Cultue

Thumbs up:

• Australia: rude gesture

• Most of the world: okay

Page 17: Cultue

Different connotations in different cultures

Sacred colors

Green and blue in Arabic countries

Yellow in Buddhist countries

Colors of mourning: black / white / purple / saffron...

Warning indicators: yellow / red

Page 18: Cultue

The way to deal with diversity is not to The way to deal with diversity is not to deny it or ignore it, but to learn about deny it or ignore it, but to learn about

differences so they don’t impair differences so they don’t impair communicationcommunication

Page 19: Cultue

Hofstede’s IBM study

• Geerte Hofstede was a staff psychologist at IBM International Business Machines Corporation .

• He conducted a global survey of IBM WORK force & set forward a questionnaire to 160000 IBM managers across more than 70 countries.

• Resultant database was & is a gold mine for people who study cultures.• He found four fundamental

differences in national style

Page 20: Cultue

Hofstede’s Four Dimensions

• Power Distance

• Individualism

• Masculinity

• Uncertainty Avoidance

Page 21: Cultue

• individualism versus collectivismcollectivism

• large versus small small power distance

• masculinity versus femininityfemininity

• strong versus weakweak uncertainty avoidance

Page 22: Cultue

POWERPOWER DISTANCEDISTANCE

Small

Large

Page 23: Cultue

Power Distance

• “...the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally.”

Page 24: Cultue

Power distance focuses on the degree

of equality or inequality between people in the country or society or the extent to which power inequality is accepted.

Page 25: Cultue

Power Distance

High Power Distance cultures believe that the more powerful people must be deferred to and not argued with, especially in public– Based on gender, age, seniority, position

Inequalities of power and wealth have been allowed to grow within the society. Latin American and Arab nations are ranked the highest in this category.

Page 26: Cultue

Low Power Distance cultures believe people are equal.

The society de-emphasizes the differences between citizen's power and wealth. In these societies equality and opportunity for everyone is stressed. Scandinavian and Germanic speaking countries the least.

Page 27: Cultue

Power Distance at Work

• Hierarchy• Centralization• Salary range• Participation• Privilege & status

symbols

Page 28: Cultue

• Wide salary range• Taller organization structure• Strict obedience is in practice• Employees accept that superiors have

more power tan they have & seldom by-pass chain of command.

• Employees are seen as frequently afraid of disagreeing with their bosses

• Privileges and status symbols for managers are both expected and popular

• Centralization is popular

Page 29: Cultue

Power Distance : Low

• Superiors & subordinates are regarded as one

• Flatter organization structure• Employees are not seen as very afraid

and bosses are not often autocratic or paternalistic.

• Hierarchy in organizations means an inequality of roles, established for convenience

Page 30: Cultue

Consultative relationship between boss and employees. There is less dependence on a superior and more interdependence. Subordinates will readily approach and contradict their boss.

• Decentralisation is popular, narrow salary ranges, consultation, democratic bosses, and limited privilege and status symbols are emphasized.

Page 31: Cultue

FemininityMasculinity

Page 32: Cultue

Gender

Gender focuses on the degree of traditional gender role of achievement, control, and power.

‘a situation in which the dominant values in society are success, money & things.’

Page 33: Cultue

Masculinity• Masculine roles

– assertiveness– competition– Toughness Masculine

societies: social gender roles are distinct (men focus on material success; women on quality of life)

Page 34: Cultue

Femininity

• Feminine societies: social gender roles overlap (both quality of life)

• Feminine roles– home and

children– people– family

Page 35: Cultue

A High Masculinity ranking indicates the country experiences a high degree of gender differentiation.

Men are supposed to be assertive, ambitious, and tough; women tender and take care of relationships.

Males fight back when attacked - females shouldn't. . Japan is considered by Hofstede to be the most "masculine" culture,

A Low Masculinity ranking indicates the country has a low level of differentiation and discrimination between genders. Sweden the most "feminine."

Page 36: Cultue

Masculinity / Femininity

• Centrality of work• Ways of managing &

decision making• Fem: equality,

solidarity, quality of work life

• Mas: equity, compete, performance

• Conflict resolution

Page 37: Cultue

Masculinity : High

• Male dominate a significant portion of the power structure.

• Great importance on earning, recognition, advancement & challenge

• Independent decision making is encouraged

• Achievement is defined in terms of wealth

• Career is defined as most important

Page 38: Cultue

• Emphasis on striving to be the best and failure is regarded as a disaster.

• Managers are decisive and assertive, stress is on competition and performance.

• Conflict is resolved by fighting them out.

Page 39: Cultue

Masculinity : low• Great importance on co-operation, friendly atmosphere & employment

security.• Group decisions are encouraged• Managers use intuition and strive for consensus, stress quality of work life,

and resolve conflict by compromise and negotiation. • Dominant values are caring for others and preservation, people and

relationships are important, everyone should be modes• Low level of discrimination & differentiation between genders.

Page 40: Cultue

INDIVIDUALISMINDIVIDUALISM

IndividualistIndividualist

CollectivistCollectivist

Page 41: Cultue

Identity

Identity focuses on the degree the society reinforces individual or collective achievement and interpersonal relationships.

Page 42: Cultue

Collectivism Collectivist societies:

people integrated into strong, cohesive groups; protection is exchanged for loyalty

These cultures reinforce extended families and collectives where everyone takes responsibility for fellow members of their group.

Harmony and consensus are ultimate goals

Page 43: Cultue

Individualism • Individualist societies: ties are loose and

everyone looks out for himself or herself• Individualist cultures are expected to act

according to their own interest, and work should be organised in such a way that this self-interest and the employer’s interest coincide.

• individual freedom prevails over.U.S.A. is one of the most

individualistic cultures.

Page 44: Cultue

Individualism / Collectivism

• Employee-employer relationship

• Hiring and promotion decisions

• Managerial focus• Task vs. relationship

priority

Page 45: Cultue

Individualism: at work

• Individual decisions are valued more than group decision.

• Individual have the right to differ from majority opinion.

• Promotion is on merit & performance.

• Tasks take precedence over relationship.

• Emphasize individual rights & goals

• “I” instead of “We”.

Page 46: Cultue
Page 47: Cultue

Collectivism : at work• In a collectivist culture, an employer never

hires just an individual, but a person who belongs to an in-group.

• The employee will act according to the interest of this in-group, which may not always coincide with his or her individual interest

Page 48: Cultue

• Promotion & advancement are based on seniority & loyalty.

• Relations prevail over tasks

Page 49: Cultue

HIGH

Uncertainty Avoidance

Low

Page 50: Cultue

Uncertainty

Uncertainty focuses on the level of avoidance or tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity within the society.

Page 51: Cultue

Uncertainty Avoidance

• “…the extent to which the members of a culture feel threatened by uncertain or unknown situations.”

• Presence of rules

Page 52: Cultue

Uncertainty avoidance : High Hofstede described uncertainty avoiding

societies are a society where there are many formal laws and informal rules.

There is a high need of security.

This creates a rule-oriented society that institutes laws, rules, regulations, and controls in order to reduce the amount of uncertainty

• Japan rank the highest in this category

Page 53: Cultue

Uncertainty avoidance: Low

Societies have more tolerance for a variety of opinions, less rule-oriented, more readily accepts change.

Societies are characterized by feelings that life is a continuous fight against threat, high anxiety and stress, acceptance of familiar risk but not of ambiguous situations.

Page 54: Cultue

Uncertainty Avoidance

• Necessity of rules• Time orientation• Precision &

punctuality• Interpretation of

“What is different…”• Appropriateness of

emotional displays

Page 55: Cultue

High Uncertainty Avoidance: at Work

• High premium on job security• Career Planning• Insurance & retirement benefits• Clear rules & regulations are welcomed.• Managers prefer reduction of conflict, man

precise instructions, detailed job descriptions to deal with job complexity, and avoidance of multiple bosses.

Page 56: Cultue

• Structure oriented organizations.

Prefer strong codes of behavior & management practices.

Tolerate less deviation from them

Page 57: Cultue

Low Uncertainty Avoidance: at Work

• Entrepreneurial, innovation

• Exhibit less resistance to change

• More risk taking managers

• Managers empower team members and delegate authority, rather than direct and control team decisions.

Page 58: Cultue

• Single organization.

• It assumes that national territory & limits of culture correspond.

• It is not so in case of smaller country & in case of bigger country as there are sub cultures.

• Over lapping of some dimensions.

Limitations

Page 59: Cultue

Confirmation of Hofstede’s IBM study

Despite all the limitation, Hofstede’s work

is widely acknowledged.

No other study compares so many national culture in so much detail.