Cullen 4e PPT CH09 [Re ~im kompatibility]Title Cullen 4e PPT_CH09 [Re ~im kompatibility] Author:...
Transcript of Cullen 4e PPT CH09 [Re ~im kompatibility]Title Cullen 4e PPT_CH09 [Re ~im kompatibility] Author:...
Chapter 9International Strategic Alliances: Design and ManagementInternational Strategic Alliances: Design and Management
Copyright© 2007 Thomson Learning All rights reserved
Strategic Alliances Issues
• Increasingly popular strategy to develop new product
and to expand into new markets
• However, strategic alliances are very risky and
unstable
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
unstable
• Failure rate of 30% to 60%
• Even profitable alliances can be torn by conflict
Where to Link in the Value Chain
• Alliance combining same value-chain activities are to
gain efficiencies, merge talents, or share risks
• Upstream/downstream alliances serve the objective of
low-cost supply/manufacturing
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
low-cost supply/manufacturing
• Operations/marketing alliances provide access to
markets
• Depends on the objective that the firm seeks to
achieve
Exhibit 9.2: Linking Value Chains in Strategic Alliances: Some Examples
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
Exhibit 9.3: Value-Chain Links in US International Alliances
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
Choosing a Partner: The Most Important Choice?
• Key criteria for picking an appropriate alliance partner
- Seek strategic complementarity
• Understand objectives and seek complementarity
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Understand objectives and seek complementarity
- Pick a partner with complementary skills
• One that enhances but does not necessarily
duplicate an alliance partner’s skills
Criteria for Choosing Partners
- Seek out companies with compatible management
styles
- Seek a partner that will provide the “right” level of
mutual dependency
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
mutual dependency
- Avoid the “anchor” partner
• Anchor partner: a partner that holds back the
strategic alliance because it cannot or will not
provide its share of the funding
Criteria for Choosing Partners (cont.)
- Be cautious of the “elephant-and-ant” complex
• Occurs when two companies are greatly unequal in
size
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- Assess operating-policy differences with potential
partners
- Assess the difficulty of cross-cultural communication
with a likely partner
Choosing an Alliance Type
• Three main types of strategic alliances
- Informal international cooperative alliances
- Formal international cooperative alliances
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- Formal international cooperative alliances
- International joint venture
Informal International Cooperative Alliance
• Non-legally binding agreements between companies
from two or more countries
- Agreements of any kind
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- Provide links anywhere on their value chains
- Limited involvement between companies
Formal Cooperative Alliances
• Higher degree of involvement than informal alliances
• Formal contract
• Popular in high tech industries because of high costs
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Popular in high tech industries because of high costs
and risks
International Joint Ventures (IJV)
• Separate legal entity owned by two or more parent
companies from different countries
• No need for equal ownership
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Equity based on cash or other contributions
• Ex.: One partner brings technology while other
partner brings financial contributions
Exhibit 9.5: Types of Alliances
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
Negotiating the Agreement
• IJV negotiation issues
- equity contributions
- management structure
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- management structure
- “prenuptial” agreements
Decision-making Control
• Majority ownership does not necessarily control
- Operational decisions
- Strategic decisions
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- Strategic decisions
• In IJVs, strategic decision making takes place at the
level of IJV’s board of directors or top management.
Management Structures
• Dominant parent: controls or dominates strategic
decision making
- Often has majority ownership
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- Treats the IJV as wholly owned subsidiary
• Shared management: both parent companies
contribute approximately the same number of
managers to the alliance organization
Management Structures
• Split control management control: partners usually
share strategic decision making and split functional
decision making
• Independent management structure: alliance
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Independent management structure: alliance
managers act more like managers from a separate
company
- IJVs often recruit managers from outside the parent
companies
Management Structures
• Rotating management: key positions rotate among
partners
- Popular in developing countries
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
- Trains management talent and transfers expertise
Choosing a Strategic Alliance Management Structure
• If partners have similar technologies or know-how and
contribute equally
- Shared management structure preferred
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• If partners have different technologies but contribute
equally
- Split management structure preferred
• If one partner has dominant equity position
- Dominant management structure more likely
Choosing a Strategic Alliance Management Structure
• For joint ventures
• Mature joint ventures move to independent structures as the
joint venture’s management team gains more expertise
• Joint ventures in countries with a high degree of
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Joint ventures in countries with a high degree of
government intervention produce IJVs with local partner
dominance
• Independent management structures are more likely when
the market is expanding, the venture does not require much
capital, or the venture dose not require much R&D input
from its parents
Critical HRM Problems and Issues
• Career development—must provide clear information
on how alliance assignments fit within careers
• Cultural differences
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Training
Assessing the Performance of an International Strategic Alliance
• If strategic intent is to produce immediate results,
standard financial and efficiency measures can be
used.
• Other strategic alliance provide indirect strategic
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved
• Other strategic alliance provide indirect strategic
benefits.
• IJV and ICA performance criteria: often must include
criteria other than financial, such as organizational
learning.
Exhibit 9.10: Selected Performance Criteria for Strategic Alliance
Copyright© 2007 South-Western/Thomson Learning All rights reserved