CUDA and Caffe for deep learning

24
CUDA and Caffe for deep learning Amgad Muhammad Mohamed Ghoneim

Transcript of CUDA and Caffe for deep learning

CUDA and Caffe for deep learningAmgad MuhammadMohamed Ghoneim

Outline

• GPU Computing• What is CUDA?• Why use CUDA?• When use CUDA?• CUDA - Machine Specs .• CUDA - Matrix Multiplication• CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D• Convolution Neural Networks• Auto Encoder

GPU Computing

• Moore’s law slowed down.• Computation is directed towards parallelism instead of

better processing unit performance.• CPU has a small number of processing units with very

high processing power.• GPU has a large number of processing units with

moderate processing power.

What is CUDA?

• Compute Unified Device Architecture• Introduced by nVidia in 2006.• Refers to 2 different concepts:1. CUDA Architecture: Massively parallel architecture of

modern GPUs with hundreds of cores.2. CUDA Programming Model: the model used to program

these GPUs

[Bryan Catanzaro]

Why use CUDA?

• Efficiently processing thousands of small/repeated tasks in parallel.

• It provides a methodology for these tasks to communicate and cooperate efficiently.

• Scalable and intuitive mechanism to express parallelism.

When use CUDA?

• Lots of computations and lots of data.• Parallel algorithms.• Neural Networks.• Physical Simulations• Distributed Computing• Accelerated Encryption, Decryption and Compression

CUDA – Machine Specs .Machine specs for this experiment:- Processor: Dual-core AMD Opteron(™) processor 2216 2.4 GHz (2

processors).- RAM: 32.0 GB- OS: 64-bit Windows 7- Graphics Card: Quadro FX 4600

- CUDA Driver: 5.5- CUDA Compatibility: 1.0- # of Cores: 96- Core Clock: 500MHz- Memory: 768MB- Memory Clock: 1400MHz

CUDA - Matrix MultiplicationComparing different implementations:All the times below are in milliseconds.

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10000

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Matrix Multiplication

CPU GPU

Matrix Side

Time in MS

CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D

This is a well known problem where the algorithm tries to find the 2 points that closest to each other. There are many solutions to address this problem:

1. Brute Force complexity O( n^2 )2. Divide and Conquer O( n log(n) )

For completeness there is another implementation using KD-trees with complexity similar to D&C.

CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D (cont.)Comparing different implementations:All the times below are in milliseconds.

100 1000 5000 10000 20000 25000 30000 40000 50000 1000000

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

Closest Pair in 2D

Brute Force CPU BF GPU BF GPU Optimized

Number of Points

Time in MS

CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D (cont.)Comparing different implementations:All the times below are in milliseconds.

100 1000 5000 10000 20000 25000 30000 400000

100200300400500600700800900

1000

Closest Pair in 2D

BF GPU Optimized Divide and Conquer CPU

Number of Points

Time in MS

CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D (cont.)To explain how optimized GPU version works we need to review the threads hierarchy in

the GPU works:

CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D (cont.)To explain how optimized GPU version works we need to review the memory hierarchy in

the GPU works:

CUDA – back to Matrix MultiplicationExplaining the matrix multiplication optimization on board

CUDA - Closest Pair in 2D (cont.)Explaining the optimized code on board

__global__ void FindClosestGPU2(float2* points, float* vals, int count){

__shared__ float2 sharedPoints[blockSize];if(count <= 1) return;int idx = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x;float2 thisPoint;float distanceToClosest = FLT_MAX;if(idx < count) thisPoint = points[idx];for(int currentBlockOfPoints = 0; currentBlockOfPoints < gridDim.x; currentBlockOfPoints++) {

if(threadIdx.x + currentBlockOfPoints * blockSize < count)sharedPoints[threadIdx.x] = points[threadIdx.x + currentBlockOfPoints * blockSize];

elsesharedPoints[threadIdx.x].x = reasonableINF, sharedPoints[threadIdx.x].y = reasonableINF;

__syncthreads();if(idx < count) {

float *ptr = &sharedPoints[0].x;for(int i = 0; i < blockSize; i++) {

float dist = (thisPoint.x - ptr[0]) * (thisPoint.x - ptr[0]) +(thisPoint.y - ptr[1]) * (thisPoint.y - ptr[1]);

ptr += 2;if(dist < distanceToClosest && (i + currentBlockOfPoints * blockSize < count)

&& (i + currentBlockOfPoints * blockSize != idx))distanceToClosest = dist;

}}__syncthreads();

}if(idx < count)

vals[idx] = distanceToClosest;}

CNN

Convolution, The first operation to optimize

Pooling, the second operation to optimize

Results

LeNet ResultsThe MNIST database of handwritten digits, has a training set of 60,000 examples, and a test set of 10,000 examples. We used OpenBlas for parallelization on the CPU

Due to the fact that the data set is small in size, the overhead wasn't compensated by the speedup.

1 CPU Core 2 CPU Cores 3 CPU Cores 4 CPU Cores0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

CNN

with GPU without GPU

Time in Seconds

AutoEncoder

AutoEncoders ResultsThe MNIST database of handwritten digits, has a training set of 60,000 examples, and a test set of 10,000 examples. And the main operation here is inner product

1 CPU Core 2 CPU Cores 3 CPU Cores0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Auto Encoder

with GPU without GPU

Time in Seconds

Thank You!

Questions?