Ctg underlying pathophysiology

28
Targeting the Underlying Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes

description

 

Transcript of Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Page 1: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Targeting the Underlying Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes

Page 2: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Aim

Provide practical guidance on improving diabetescare through highlighting the need to:

• understand that insulin resistance and -cell dysfunction are core defects of type 2 diabetes

• address the underlying pathophysiology

Page 3: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Type 2 diabetes

• Characterized by chronic hyperglycemia

• Associated with microvascular and macrovascular complications

• Generally arises from a combination of insulin resistance and -cell dysfunction

Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications. Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance,World Health Organization, Geneva 1999. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org.uk/infocentre/carerec/diagnosi.doc

Page 4: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

• Major defect in individuals with type 2 diabetes1

• Reduced biological response to insulin1–3

• Strong predictor of type 2 diabetes4

• Closely associated with obesity5

What is insulin resistance?

IRIR

1American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 1998; 21:310–314.2Beck-Nielsen H & Groop LC. J Clin Invest 1994; 94:1714–1721. 3Bloomgarden ZT. Clin Ther 1998; 20:216–231.

4Haffner SM, et al. Circulation 2000; 101:975–980. 5Boden G. Diabetes 1997; 46:3–10.

Page 5: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

What is -cell dysfunction?

• Major defect in individuals with type 2 diabetes

• Reduced ability of -cells to secrete insulin in response to hyperglycemia

DeFronzo RA, et al. Diabetes Care 1992; 15:318–354.

Page 6: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Insulin resistance and -cell dysfunction are core defects of type 2 diabetes

Insulinresistance

Genetic susceptibility,obesity, Western

lifestyle

Type 2 diabetes

IR-celldysfunction

Rhodes CJ & White MF. Eur J Clin Invest 2002; 32 (Suppl. 3):3–13.

Page 7: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

How do insulin resistance and -cell dysfunction combine to cause type 2 diabetes?

Abnormalglucose tolerance

Hyperinsulinemia,then -cell failure

Normal IGT* Type 2 diabetes

Post-prandial glucose

Insulin resistance

Increased insulinresistance

Fasting glucose Hyperglycemia

Insulinsecretion

*IGT = impaired glucose tolerance

Adapted from Type 2 Diabetes BASICS. International Diabetes Center (IDC), Minneapolis, 2000.

Page 8: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

• Several methods exist, including:

– continuous sampling of insulin/glucose1

• gold standard, but impractical for large-scale use

– single measure of insulin/glucose2

• simple estimate from fasting insulin and glucose

• useful for assessment on a larger scale

How is insulin resistance measured?

1Bergman RN, et al. Eur J Clin Invest 2002; 32 (Suppl. 3):35–45.2Matthews DR, et al. Diabetologia 1985; 28:412–419.

Page 9: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

More than 80% of patients progressing to type 2 diabetes are insulin resistant

Insulin resistant;low insulin secretion

(54%)

Insulin resistant; good insulin secretion

(29%)

Insulin sensitive;good insulin secretion (1%)

Insulin sensitive;low insulin secretion (16%)

83%83%

Haffner SM, et al. Circulation 2000; 101:975–980.

Page 10: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Insulin resistance – reduced response to circulating insulin

Insulinresistance

Glucose output Glucose uptake Glucose uptake

Hyperglycemia

Liver Muscle Adiposetissue

IR

Page 11: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Overall, 75% of patients with type 2 diabetes die from cardiovascular disease

Gray RP & Yudkin JS. Cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. In Textbook of Diabetes 2nd Edition, 1997. Blackwell Sciences.

Page 12: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Insulin resistance is as strong a risk factor for cardiovascular disease as smoking

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Od

ds

rati

o f

or

inci

den

t C

VD

Age Smoking Total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol

Insulinresistance

Bonora E, et al. Diabetes Care 2002; 25:1135–1141.

Page 13: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Insulin resistance is closely linked to cardiovascular disease

Present in > 80% of people with type 2 diabetes1

Approximately doubles

the risk of a cardiac event2

Implicated in almost half of CHD events in individuals with type 2 diabetes2

Insulinresistance IR

1Haffner SM, et al. Circulation 2000; 101:975–980.2Strutton D, et al. Am J Man Care 2001; 7:765–773.

Page 14: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Insulin resistance is linked to a range of cardiovascular risk factors

Atherosclerosis

Hyperglycemia

Dyslipidemia

Hypertension

Damage to blood vessels

Clotting abnormalities

Inflammation

Insulinresistance

IR

Zimmet P. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2002; 12:354–362.

Page 15: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

~90% of people with type 2 diabetes are overweight or obese

World Health Organization, 2005. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/facts/obesity

Page 16: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

How is -cell function measured?

-cell function is difficult to measure and most methods are impractical for large-scale use1

• Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) provides a simple estimate of -cell function2

• Proinsulin:insulin ratio is sometimes used as a marker of -cell dysfunction1

1Matthews DR, et al. Diabetologia 1985; 28:412–419.2Bergman RN, et al. Eur J Clin Invest 2002; 32 (Suppl. 3):35–45.

Page 17: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Why does the -cell fail?

Chronic hyperglycemia

Oversecretion of insulin to compensate for insulin resistance1,2

High circulating free fatty acids

Glucotoxicity2

Pancreas

Lipotoxicity3

-celldysfunction

1Boden G & Shulman GI. Eur J Clin Invest 2002; 32:14–23.2Kaiser N, et al. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2003; 16:5–22.

3Finegood DT & Topp B. Diabetes Obes Metab 2001; 3 (Suppl. 1):S20–S27.

Page 18: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Glycemic control declines over time

9

8

7

60

Years from randomization

Diet

Sulfonylurea or insulin

6.2% upper limit of normal range

0 3 6 9 12 15

Med

ian

Hb

A1c

(%)

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352:837–853.

Page 19: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Loss of -cell function occurs before diagnosis

Time from diagnosis (years)

Up to 50% loss

100

80

60

40

-ce

ll fu

nct

ion

(%

)

20

0

Diagnosis

-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6

Holman RR. Diabetes Res Clin Prac 1998; 40 (Suppl.):S21–S25.

Page 20: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Oral antidiabetic agents – do they target insulin resistance and

-cell dysfunction?

Page 21: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Barriers to achieving good glycemic control

Inadequate targeting of underlying pathophysiology

Page 22: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Primary sites of action of oral antidiabetic agents

Glucose output

Insulin resistance

Biguanides

Insulin secretion

Sulfonylureas/meglitinides

Carbohydrate breakdown/absorption

-glucosidase inhibitors

Insulin resistance

Thiazolidinediones

Kobayashi M. Diabetes Obes Metab 1999; 1 (Suppl. 1):S32–S40.

Nattrass M & Bailey CJ. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 13:309–329.

Page 23: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

The dual action of thiazolidinediones reduces HbA1c

+

HbA1c

Insulinresistance IR

-cellfunction

Lebovitz HE, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:280–288.

Page 24: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Potential to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes in at-risk women

Troglitazone reduced progression to type 2 diabetes by > 50%

Pro

po

rtio

n w

ith

dia

bet

es 0.5

0.6

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

Time on trial (months)

100 20 30 40 50 60

Placebo

Troglitazone* 400 mg/day

Buchanan TA, et al. Diabetes 2002; 51:2796–2803.

*Troglitazone is no longer available

Page 25: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Su

bje

cts

(%)

100

Screening

80

60

40

20

0Week 12 Screening Week 12

Placebo Rosiglitazone 8 mg/day

IGT100%

IGT89%

T2DM11%

IGT100%

NGT44%

IGT56%

Can thiazolidinediones delay progression from IGT to T2DM?

Bennett SM, et al. Diabet Med 2004; 21:415–422.

Page 26: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Does decreasing insulin resistance decrease macrovascular complications?

Myocardial infarction

Not significant

All-cause mortality

Not significant

Sulfonylureas/insulin

Myocardial infarction

Significant

All-cause mortality

Significant

Metformin

21% 8% 39% 36%

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352:854–865.

Page 27: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

Insulin sensitizers reduce cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes

12-m

on

th c

om

bin

ed e

ven

t ra

te (

%)

0

10

20

30

40

Non-sensitizers Sensitizers

50

60

Kao JA, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43:37A.

Page 28: Ctg underlying pathophysiology

How can diabetes care and outcomes be improved?

The Global Partnership recommends:

Address the underlying pathophysiology, including treatment of insulin resistance

Del Prato S, et al. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59:1345–1355.