CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

141
CTEL Exam Prep Module 2 Mark Rounds

Transcript of CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

Page 1: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Exam PrepModule 2

Mark Rounds

Page 2: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

Contact Information

•email: [email protected]•website: ctelresources.wetpaint.com

Page 3: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

Module 2

• Domain 2 - Foundations of English Language/Literacy Development and Content Instruction

• Domain 3 - Approaches and Methods for ELD and Content Instruction

• Domain 1 - Assessment of English Learners

Page 4: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 2 004

Foundations of Programs for English Learners

CTEL Text: Chapter 4Participant Manual: pp. 13-21

Page 5: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Benchmarks 116-126• 1700-European immigrants settle in rural enclaves and run their own non-English-speaking schools

• 1839-Ohio is the first state to adopt a bilingual education law, allowing schools to operate in German and English at parent request

• 1847-Louisiana passes similar law for French & English

• 1848-Treaty gave Mexicans the right to speak Spanish in CA

• 1864-Congress prohibits Native Americans from being taught in their own language

Page 6: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Benchmarks 116-126• 1870-School Superintendent in St. Louis points out socio-cultural weaknesses if people lose ability in native language

• 1879-Children are punished when caught using native language

• 1888-Legislation attempted in both states• 1900-At least 600,000 taught in German• 1906-Congress passes first English-only law

• 1917-Anti-German sentiment begins to extend to other languages

Page 7: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Benchmarks 116-126• 1934-The de facto policy continues into the 40’s & 50’s

• 1959-Cuban immigrants arrive in Miami• 1961-Full bilingual program for Cuban immigrants

• 1968-Act provided money for programs of native language instruction

• 1974-Supreme Court determines that schools that do not make special provisions for students learning English are not providing equal educational opportunities.

Page 8: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Benchmarks 116-126• 1980-Ordinance is in response to new waves of immigrants who are poorer and less educated

• 1994-Prop 187 would have made it illegal to provide education to illegal residents. Was overturned on appeal

• 1998-Ed. Code 300-340-Required that instruction be overwhelmingly in English

• 2001-Provided federal funding to schools to support the instruction of English Learners

• 2004-Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ensures an equitable education for students with disabilities

• 2004-CA schools must provide equitable access to textbooks and facilities, and facilities and teachers must be appropriately authorized

Page 9: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Lau vs Nichols 118• Supreme Court decision (1974) of a suit brought by native Chinese speaker in San Francisco schools

• Made illegal those educational practices that excluded children from effective education on the basis of language

• Court ruled that simply providing same instruction and materials in English was not equitable

Page 10: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Lau Remedies 119• Published by US Commissioner for Ed.• Standardized requirements for identifying and evaluating ELs.

• Defined instructional treatments, procedures to transfer to all-English classes, and professional standards for teachers.

• Still in use in states without regulations.

Page 11: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) NCLB (Title III) 123, 126• States that “English Learners will develop high levels of academic proficiency and meet the same challenging academic standards as do their native-English speaking peers.”

• Funding for ELs and immigrants• Accountability requires annual progress in learning English, progress towards reclassification, and academic progress

Page 12: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) IDEA 122• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

• Reauthorized previous Special Education law

• Stipulates that children not be labeled disabled if poor school achievement is due to ethnic, linguistic, or racial difference

Page 13: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Proposition 227 124-125

• Ed. Code 300-340• Instruction overwhelmingly in English• Alternative programs through waiver process

Page 14: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Williams vs CA 125

• Requires equity in provision of textbooks, maintenance of facilities, and appropriately authorized staff (including teachers of English Learners)

Page 15: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Heritage Language 126

• AKA “developmental bilingual programs”

• Designed for students with a primary language other than English.

• Goals include maintenance and development of native language

Page 16: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Dual Immersion 127

• Half EL, half EO• Goal is for students to be proficient in both languages … AKA additive bilingualism

• High level of academic competence in two languages by ELs and EOs

Page 17: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) English Only 127-128

• Goal of assimilation• Belief that common language is a unifier

• Belief that students will be more academically successful

Page 18: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Equity Issues 129-130• Program Placement

• Length of time in program• Tracking• Special Ed

• Student Data• Retention/promotion• Dropout rates/expulsion and detention rates

• Staffing• Teacher qualification• Teacher retention

• Funding

Page 19: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Types and ModelsStructured English

ImmersionEnglish Language

MainstreamDual Language Transitional

Bilingual Education

Placement Criteria

Less than reasonable fluency

Reasonable fluency Parental exception waiver

Parental exception waiver

Exit Criteria Reasonable fluency Fully fluent Parent choice District criteria

Program Length 1 year Until redesignated Parent choice District criteria

Class Composition District policy ELs and EOs 50/50 ideal Depends on models

Language Composition

Overwhelmingly in English

Overwhelmingly in English

Depends on model

Depends on model

Required Components

•ELD•Access to core(CBELD)

•ELD•Access to core(SDAIE)

•ELD•Access to core(L1/L2)

•ELD•Access to core(L1/L2)

Page 20: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Parental Exception Waivers 124Waiver Type Prerequisites Conditions Time Frame

A. English Speakers

Knows English based on standardized tests

NA Within 20 instructional days

B.Older Students 10 years or older Informed belief Within 20 instructional days

C.Special Needs Already placed for not less than 30 days in an English Language classroom

Informed belief, with approval

No later than 10 days after 30 day placement or 20 instructional days

Page 21: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) English Language Development (ELD)

• Goal: Language Proficiency

• Purpose: Developing SKILLS

• Limitations: Appropriate for development of language ONLY. Content will not be grade-level appropriate

Page 22: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) Content-Based ELD 138• Goal: Access to core

• Purpose: Develop language through core content

• Limitations: While providing access to some core content, concepts do not provide grade-level academics.

Page 23: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(004) SDAIE 139-140• Goal: Access to grade-level core content

• Purpose: Mastery of grade-level core content through specially designed, language-based strategies

• Limitations: Delivery may only include essential standards due to need for slower pacing.

Page 24: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 2 005

Foundations of English Literacy

CTEL Text: Chapter 5Participant Manual: pp.22-30

Page 25: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Oral and Written

• Oral Language Written Language• Language Experience Approach

• Written Language Oral Language• Using text to paraphrase

Page 26: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Vocabulary Knowledge

• How well developed vocabulary is• Level of vocabulary: social vs academic

Page 27: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Educational Background

• Prior knowledge• Literacy skills• Previous schooling• Background knowledge(familiarity with concepts)

Page 28: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Level of English Proficiency• Beginner• Early Intermediate• Intermediate• Early Advanced• Advanced

Page 29: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Primary Language

• How well developed literacy skills are• Linguistic differences between primary language and English

Page 30: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Motivation

• Necessity• Personal importance• Affiliation (e.g. teacher, peers)

Page 31: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150 • Integrate listening, speaking, reading, and writing

• Being cognizant of integrating L S R W while teaching Math, Social Studies, Science.

• Example: After a science experiment, use the Language Experience Approach to develop literacy through science

Page 32: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices

• Provides a balanced, comprehensive reading program

• Balance between phonics and comprehension; integrates L S R W

Page 33: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150• Uses standards-based thematic unit organization

• Themes based on standards

Page 34: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150

• Creates a language-rich environment

• Accessible contextualized print, guest speakers, films, experiments…

Page 35: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150

• Adapts instruction and materials to meet the special needs of English Learners

• Culturally and linguistically appropriate

• Use effective strategies (graphic organizers, visuals, contextualization, realia, etc.)

Page 36: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150

• Plans meaningful and purposeful literacy activities

• Relating your content and instruction to real life

Page 37: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150

• Selects appropriate reading materials

• Variety of genres, multicultural text, high interest, relevant

• Make sure that EL proficiency level is taken into consideration

Page 38: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices

• Utilizes English Learners’ prior knowledge to promote English language development in reading and writing

• Connect to students’ backgrounds

Page 39: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices

• Scaffolds literacy activities

• Provide well structured activities with ample support

• Example: Brainstorm/outline before required to write

Page 40: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Pedagogical Practices 150

• Provides organized, systematic, explicit instruction in key skills

• Make no assumptions• Skills must be taught

Page 41: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(005) Effective Approaches 177• Frontloading Vocabulary 249• Language Experience Approach 257-258

• Interactive Journals 262• Shared Reading• Learning Logs• Process Writing 264-266• Graphic Organizers 177-184• Pre-Reading Activities 251, 253

Page 42: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 2 006

Instructional Planning and Organization for ELD and SDAIE

CTEL Text: Chapter 5Participant Manual: pp. 31-40

Page 43: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD Standards

• The Role of ELD Standards• Relationship to Native Speakers• Levels of English Proficiency 91

Page 44: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD Standards

Page 45: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD Standards

Page 46: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD Standards

Page 47: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD Standards

Page 48: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD Standards

Page 49: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Relationship between ELA and ELD

ELA HIGHWAY

R W L,S

Page 50: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) SDAIE 139-144

• What is SDAIE?• Who should receive SDAIE and why?• Why is SDAIE more than “just good teaching”?

• What is the role of primary language in a SDAIE class?

• What are some successful SDAIE strategies?

Page 51: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) ELD vs SDAIE

ELD – English Language Development Expected learning outcome:explicit, concise, and in-line with appropriate CA ELD and/or Content standards. Focus:Academic English Language Development.  Lesson CharacteristicsEmphasis is on developing academic English vocabulary and language structures.Accessing prior knowledge is essential.Incorporating and valuing the home culture of the student and the student’s family.Several opportunities for students to practice all 4 ELD strands – Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening.

SDAIE – Structurally Designed Academics in English Expected learning outcome:explicit, concise, and in-line with appropriate CA Content standards. Focus:Content, but mindful of continuing academic English language development. Lesson CharacteristicsEmphasis is on developing content knowledge in English.L1 (Primary Language) can be used to provide conceptual support.English vocabulary needs to be frontloaded.Scaffold abstract ideas and concepts that require organization.

Page 52: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Content and Language

• Content Standard: Students know causes and effects of different types of severe weather…

• CONTENT Objective: Students will be able to DEFINE and DESCRIBE… RECOGNIZE…

• LANGUAGE Objective: Students will PARTICIPATE in discussions…DEFINE and DESCRIBE…will be able to PRESENT…

Page 53: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Grouping Strategies 161-167 • Mixed with proficient English speakers

• For hands-on, concrete activities • Mixed with same native-language background• For conceptually demanding or abstract content

• Preview-review…• Description on page 35

Page 54: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Language Development

• Primary Language Groups• Proficiency Level Groups• Mixed Group w/Proficient English Speakers

Page 55: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Conceptual Development

• Primary Language Groups• Proficiency Level Groups• Prior Knowledge/Schooling• Reading Level

Page 56: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Classroom Community Development • Mixed/Heterogeneous

Page 57: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Physical Setting

• Supports Student Interaction• Physical Arrangement of Furniture• Configurations for whole group vs small group• Teacher and Student Movement

• Language Rich Environment• Display and use a variety of print materials in primary language and English

• Offers Stimuli for Conversation• Use of wall space to display content-related information

• Use of technology and multimedia

Page 58: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(006) Organizing

• Role of Paraprofessionals• Provide and monitor small group instruction

• Provide individual support• Assist in primary language instruction

• Volunteers• Older students, parents, community members

• Team Teaching• By subject matter or proficiency level

• Technology• Multimedia and specially designed software

Page 59: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 2 007

Components of Effective Instructional Delivery in ELD and SDAIE

CTEL Text: Chapter 5Participant Manual: pp. 41-46

Page 60: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Cummins’ Grid

A CB D

Cognitively Undemanding

Cognitively Demanding

ContextEmbedded

ContextReduced

Complete Quadrant Activity p.40

Page 61: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Modification

Modifying…• vocabulary• speed• stress• intonation• repetition• amplification

Page 62: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Primary Language

• Using cognates• Primary language text materials• Peer support

Page 63: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Prior Knowledge

• KWL chart• Anticipation guide• Discussion/brainstorm

Page 64: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Contextualization

Embed language in understandable context such as…

• Realia - manipulatives, hands-on props

• Visual support – multimedia and technology resources, charts/maps, nonverbal language

Page 65: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Assessment

• Formative• Summative• Re-teaching as a result

Page 66: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Checking for Understanding• Monitoring comprehension frequently• Checking for different levels of comprehension• Literal• Inferential• Evaluative

• Effective questioning techniques• Wait time• Framing questions appropriately• Different types of questions

Page 67: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Explicit Teachings

• Name• Give the strategy a name…

• Model• How do you use the strategy?

• Explain• Describe how strategy helps…

• Apply• Tell when and how strategy can be used

• Example• …

Page 68: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(007) Content-Specific Discourse•pp.194-208•List some of the discourse skills that are critical to a content area that you teach in the specific categories…

Page 69: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 3 008

Effective Resource Use for ELD and SDAIE

CTEL Text: Chapter 5 (184-189)Participant Manual: pp. 47-52

Page 70: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(008) In the CA H/SS Standards

• White- 63 Male, 11 Female• Black- 12 Male, 5 Female• Latino- 0 Male, 1 Female• Asian- 0 Male, 0 Female• Native- 4 Male, 0 Female

• Total- 79 Male, 17 Female

Page 71: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(008) Textbook Analyses

• Picture Analysis• “People to Study” Analysis• Anthology Analysis• Storyline Analysis

Page 72: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(008) Brainstorm…

• How can you modify materials to meet the cognitive, linguistic, cultural, and academic needs of English Learners?

• What should you consider in choosing basic and supplementary materials?

Page 73: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 3 009

Approaches and Methods for ELD and Content Instruction

CTEL Text: Chapter 5Participant Manual: pp. 53-56

Page 74: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Brainstorm…

• Reflect on some of the ways you were taught a foreign language in high school and college.

• What were some of the activities that you participated in?

• How well did you learn the language?

Page 75: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Natural Approach 60-61• Theoretical Base: Krashen’s Monitor Model

• Goal: Comprehension• Key Features: Closely resembles the way that a child acquires a first language.

• Effectiveness: Because it is based in acquisition, it is effective when followed explicitly.

Page 76: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Natural Approach 60-61

Stage 1:Pre-Production

Stage 2:Early Production

Stage 3:Speech Emergence

Stage 4:Intermediate Fluency

Characteristics:-minimal comprehension-no verbal production

Activity Behaviors:-listen-point-move-choose-match-mime-act out-draw

Characteristics:-limited comprehension-one/two word response

Activity Behaviors:-name-list-respond-label-categorize

Characteristics:-good comprehension (if context)-errors in pronunciation and grammar-simple sentences-limited descriptive vocabulary

Activity Behaviors:-describe-define-explain-recall-retell-summarize-role-play-compare/contrast

Characteristics:-good comprehension-few grammar errors-near native speech

Activity Behaviors:-give opinions-defend-debate-justify-examine-analyze-create-evaluate-read-write

Page 77: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Total Physical Response 54• Theoretical Base: James Asher, based on association between language and body movement

• Goal: Comprehension • Key Features:

• Listening precedes speaking• Understanding is developed through body movement

• Speaking is never forced• Effectiveness: Allows for low-stress acquisition of receptive vocabulary

Page 78: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) CALLA 158-159• Theoretical Base: Chamot & O’Malley• Goal: Development of learning strategies

• Key Features: CALLA is targeted at EL students at the early intermediate and intermediate levels of English language proficiency.

• Effectiveness: Because of its cognitive and metacognitive strategies, CALLA is designed provide transitional instruction from CBELD to SDAIE classrooms

Page 79: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Structured Interactions

• Meaningful• Purposeful• Oral and written• Maximizes language output• Can negotiate meaning in a supportive context

• Use during ELD and content instruction

• Dynamic groups--homogeneous, heterogeneous, etc.

Page 80: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Strategies

Oral Strategies• Numbered Heads Together 166• Think--Pair--Share

Written Strategies• Write Around• Cooperative Paragraph Strips

Page 81: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Explicit Instruction

Error Correction 266• Teachable moment• To explain or clarify• Language structure• Word meaning

Grammar Development 269• Guided by ELD Standards

Page 82: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Implicit Instruction

Error Correction 266• Modeling• Providing feedback• Using correct syntactical structure

Grammar Development 269• Interactive journal (writing)• SSR (reading)

Page 83: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(009) Content-Based ELD 197• Who? - K-3, B-A…4-12, B-EI• What? - Content instruction is given at the students’ ELD level (not necessarily grade level)

• Which Standards? - Integrates ELD standards with content standards

• When? - Throughout the day (outside of ELD instruction)

• Why? - To provide access to core while developing English

• How? - tapping prior knowledge, contextualization, graphic organizers, brainstorming, visuals, C.L., etc.

Page 84: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 3 010

ELD--Listening and Speaking

CTEL Text: Chapter 6Participant Manual: pp. 57-60

Page 85: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Listening

• pp. 214-217 in the CTEL Text• Listening for Basic Comprehension• Listening to Repeat• Listening to Understand• Listening for Communication

Page 86: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Listening

• p. 218 in the CTEL Text• Example Listening Activities at each ELD level

Page 87: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Listening

• p. 219 in the CTEL Text• The Listening Process

• Before Listening• During Listening• After Listening

Page 88: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Speaking

• p. 220-225 in the CTEL Text• Developing Oral Language

• Situations for Speaking• Resources for Spoken Discourse• Teaching Pronunciation

Page 89: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Speaking

• p. 227-231 in the CTEL Text• The Speaking Process

• Before Speaking• During Speaking• After Speaking• Oral Discourse and Instructional Conversation

Page 90: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Skills that Promote L/S

• Comprehension• Organization and Delivery of Oral Communication

• Analysis and Evaluation

**Many of these skills can be used as examples in a constructed response**

Page 91: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Strategies that Promote L/SFrontloading…• Teaching key vocabulary before they encounter it

• Explicitly teaching language functionsPre-teaching• Small group discussion in L1• Preview/review• Use primary language text before English text

Brainstorming…• Scaffold with sentence frames

Page 92: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(010) Strategies that Promote L/SCooperative Learning• Teaching interactive structure first before it is used

academically

Whole-class and small group discussions• Teaching turn-taking

Role-plays• Modeling

Interviews• Practicing questioning and answering techniques• Sentence frames

Debriefing• Think-Pair-Share(or other coop. strategy) to reflect on

lesson

Page 93: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 3 011

ELD--Reading and Writing

CTEL Text: Chapter 7Participant Manual: pp. 61-64

Page 94: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) ELD Reading Standard Sequence

ELA HIGHWAY

BEI

I

EAA

Reading Onramp

Page 95: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Reading

• pp. 238-241 in the CTEL Text• Personal Factors Affecting Reading

• Primary Language Literacy Level• Transfer of Primary Language Literacy• Level of EL Proficiency

Page 96: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Reading

• pp. 242-248 in the CTEL Text• Foundations of Literacy

• Standards-Based Reading Instruction• Transfer of Reading Skills• Developing Word Analysis Skills

Page 97: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Reading

• pp. 248-251 in the CTEL Text• Developing Fluency

• Reading Aloud• Seeking Meaning• Systematic Vocabulary Development• Contextual Redefinition

Page 98: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Reading

• p. 251-254 in the CTEL Text• The Reading Process

• Before Reading• During Reading• After Reading

Page 99: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Skills That Promote Reading

• Word Analysis• Fluency• Systematic Vocabulary Development

• Reading Comprehension• Literary Response and Analysis

Page 100: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Reading

• pp. 254-259 in the CTEL Text• Developing Reading Comprehension

• Match to Proficiency Level• Strategies When Comprehension Fails• Text Genres• Grade-Level Appropriate Texts• Critical thinking• Creative Thinking and Risk Taking

Page 101: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Writing

• pp. 260-262 in the CTEL Text• Writing and the English Learner

• College Writing• Writing as a Social Construction• Stages of Writing Development

Page 102: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Writing

• p. 263 in the CTEL Text• Writing Genres and Prompts

• Writing Narrative Prose• Writing Expository Prose

• p. 268 in the CTEL Text• Adaptations in Writing for English Learners

Page 103: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(011) Skills That Promote Writing

• Writing Strategies and Application

• Writing that reflects purpose, speaker, audience, and form across different writing genres

• English Language Conventions

Page 104: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 3 012

Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE)

CTEL Text: Chapters 4 & 5Participant Manual: pp. 65-76

Page 105: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) Key Components of SDAIE• Tap into prior knowledge• Contextualize the lesson• Provide a positive affective domain

• Teach study skills• Modify the use of the textbook

Page 106: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) Scaffolding Strategies

• Provides a personal connection between learner and topic. Builds on known concepts

• Helps simplify complex concepts. Creates an experiential environment

• The more familiar students are with the features of the text, the more successful…

• Clarifies procedures and expectations• Fosters autonomy through self monitoring• Pre-teach terms so they will be understood in the lesson

Page 107: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) Scaffolding Strategies

• Students extend their understanding by applying it in novel formats

• To promote critical thinking skills• Learning is most effective when students have opportunities to discuss and process content

• Different ways of determining student performance to provide more accurate evidence as to whether learning has taken place

• Clarifies misconceptions and further develops proficiency in English

Page 108: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) SDAIE Lesson Plan Format 151-160• Grade Level• Content Standard• ELD Standard• Assessment• Learning Opportunities

• Into• Through • Beyond

Page 109: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) SDAIE Lesson Plan

• Grade Level-5• Content Standard - 5.3.2 Students know when liquid water evaporates, it turns into water vapor in the air and can reappear as a liquid when cooled or as a solid if cooled below the freezing point of water.

• ELD Standard - Write brief expository compositions(e.g. description, comparison and contrast, cause and effect, and problem and solution) that include a thesis and some points of support.

• Assessment - Students will write a one paragraph composition comparing and contrasting the different forms of water.

Page 110: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) SDAIE Lesson Plan

Learning Opportunities• Into - Using the think-pair-share cooperative grouping model,

students will write brief 1-2 sentence narratives of any experience that they have had with the different forms of water. As the T-P-S model dictates, they will pair up to relate their sentences to a partner, then share out in table groups. -Students will read summary of the lesson reading in table groups in order to preload content. -Class will review the concept of comparing and contrasting using actual forms of water.

• Through - Using a graphic organizer that pictorially represents the water cycle, students will develop understanding of the relationships the different forms of water have with one another. Students will then compare and contrast their charts with the charts of table mates. -Students will develop a paragraph comparing and contrasting the different elements of the water cycle based on teacher-modeled representation.

• Beyond - Students will create a haiku that describes water in its liquid, solid and gaseous forms

Page 111: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(012) SDAIE Lesson Reflection

How is this lesson different for English Learners? What makes it MORE than just good teaching?

Page 112: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 1 002

Role, Purposes, and Types of Assessment

CTEL Text: Chapter 3Participant Manual: pp. 77-84

Page 113: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) CELDT

• What? - State Test of ELD, Based on Standards

• Who? - All English learners• Why? - Initial Identification, Annual Assessment, Redesignation, Reclassification

• When? - Annual Assessment- 7/1-10/31, Initial Assessment-30 days from enroll date

• 4 grade spans: K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12• 4 parts: L, S, R, W• 5 Levels: B, EI, I, EA, A

Page 114: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) ID and Placement

•Chart on p. 76

Page 115: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Home Language Survey

Page 116: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Parent must be notified… 145

• Language assessment and academic assessment results

• Placement in an EL classroom• The opportunity to apply for a parental exception waiver

Page 117: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Redesignation/Reclassification

Possible Criteria:• Teacher evaluation of language proficiency and curriculum mastery

• CELDT score• Parental consultation• Objective data from standardized tests

• etc.

Page 118: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Identification

• CELDT Score: Early Advanced • L/S: Intermediate or above• R: Intermediate or above• W: Intermediate or above

A student who falls below any of these criteria is an EL.

Page 119: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Reclassification

• CELDT: Meets criteria on previous slide

• Objective criteria: ELA score of BASIC on California Content Standards Test.

• Other criteria identified by district: i.e. teacher observation, grades, writing sample, etc.

Page 120: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Reclassification

Page 121: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Validity 100

A test is valid if it measures what it claims to be measuring.

Page 122: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Reliability 100

A test is reliable if it yields predictably similar scores over several administrations.

Page 123: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Traditional Assessment 99•Limits of Traditional(Standardized) Assessments•Time•Linguistic Bias•Cultural Bias•Test Anxiety•Equivalent Versions•Rapport

Page 124: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Textbook Tests 101• Purpose - to provide a direct measure of what was presented in the text

• Feature – aligned to state standards• Limitations – lack of relevance to the student or the culture of the community

• Modifications - partner work, supplemental text features

Page 125: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Performance-Based Tests 101• Purpose – designed to offer information about a student’s proficiency

• Feature - open-ended tasks• Limitations - time

• Modifications - design groups for optimal language performance, scoring rubrics

Page 126: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Curriculum Tasks 102• Purpose – measure the success of activities performed in class

• Feature – add-on assessment unnecessary

• Limitations – difficult to assess skill level independent of help

• Modifications - partner work, scoring rubrics

Page 127: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Authentic Tests 102• Purpose - assess proficiency on a task commonly found outside the classroom

• Feature – stem from classroom activities, allow students to self-evaluate

• Limitations - lack of comparison group for accountability

• Modifications - portfolios, group or individual

Page 128: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Teacher-Made Tests 103• Purpose - assess teaching of material• Feature – ease of construction and administration

• Limitations - reliability/validity

• Modifications - focus on message, not form

Page 129: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(002) Portfolio Assessments 103• long-term record of student progress• clear measure of student progress instead of a single number

• opportunity for improved student self-image as a result of showing progress and accomplishment

• recognize different learning styles• can include writing samples, self-assessments, audio, photo, video, graphic organizers, teacher notes

Page 130: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 1 001

Principles of Standards-Based Assessment and Instruction

CTEL Text: Chapter 3Participant Manual: pp. 85-94

Page 131: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(001) ELD Standards• ELD Standards are a pathway to the ELA standards for ELs.

• The ELD standards establish clear performance expectations for ELs. The ELD standards are to be used to plan/provide instruction for English Language Development.

• The ELD standards are based on proficiency levels and grade-level spans in L/S, R, and W.

• The ELD standards are based on the same components as the ELA standards. An English Learner may require more explicit steps to reach a standard.

• The CELDT is aligned with the ELD standards.

Page 132: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(001) Standards-Based…

1. STANDARDS inform ASSESSMENT2. ASSESSMENT informs INSTRUCTION3. Students engage in LEARNING4. Students DEMONSTRATE what they

know5. Students experience LEARNING, or6. Teacher RETEACHES

Page 133: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(001) Standards and EL Students

• ELs must have access to the core in order to meet standards.

• Teachers must develop benchmarks to show that these students are moving toward the standards.

• Teachers must teach to the ELD standards.

Page 134: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(001) Building a Scaffolded Assessment

• Read the information on p.88

Page 135: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

CTEL Module 2 Domain 1 003

Language and Content-Area Assessment

CTEL Text: Chapter 3Participant Manual: pp. 95-97

Page 136: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(003) Language Assessments Informal• Teacher Observation 103• Benchmark Assessments/Checklist• Story Tell/RetellFormal• CELDT• Content Standards Test• Other commercial assessments

Page 137: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(003) Identification… 110-111• Referral process• Early intervention• Continued services during and after placement

Page 138: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(003) Academic… 109-110• Sound-Symbol Relationships• Receptive Language• Metacognition• Informal Retention• Motor Control• Social-Emotional Functioning• Attending and Focusing• Culture/Language Shock

Page 139: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(003)Underachievement… 293-297• retention, placement, and promotion• ELD as compensatory education• dropping out of high school• difficulties in higher education• difficulties attaining management status

Page 140: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(003) Overachievement… 297 • “Model Minorities” become over-qualified for jobs

• Teacher expectations of some groups elicit higher achievement

• Some subgroups resist assimilation

Page 141: CTEL Module 2 PPT 02/2012

(003) Issues…•Dropouts

• Tendency is to blame students• The need is to provide high quality curriculum and instruction and know about the students and their families

•Retention• 10% of language minority students are retained

•Tracking• Educational gaps continue