CTC MISSION STATEMENT...preparatory and developmental curricula, tutoring and learn-ing support, and...
Transcript of CTC MISSION STATEMENT...preparatory and developmental curricula, tutoring and learn-ing support, and...
Karen Schmitt, Dean
Coy Gullett, Budget & Finance
The Community & Technical College enhances, promotes and provides quality education and training that is responsive
to the needs of lifelong learners in a changing world through leadership collaboration within the community.
CTC MISSION STATEMENT
To achieve the college mission and prioritize resources, the Community & Technical College (CTC) administers academic programs and services within three function-al areas
Academic Programs: provide quality career & technical programs to degree and certificate seeking students to serve Alaska workforce needs - Aviation Technology, Career & Technical Education (includes Tech Prep), Computer Networking & Office Technology, Culinary Arts, Hospitality, Construction & Design Technology, Dietetics and Nutrition, Health Physical Education & Recreation, Transportation and Power
Extended Studies and Workforce Development: pro-vide general education, continuing education and testing services for all UAA students, including military, professionals and the community - Chugiak-Eagle River Campus, Continuing Education, Military Programs, Air Force ROTC, Army ROTC
Student Academic Support Services: provide college preparatory and developmental curricula, tutoring and learn-ing support, and academic advising to incoming UAA Anchor-age Campus underprepared students and CTC majors to in-crease university and college retention and completion rates - College Preparatory & Developmental Studies, Learning Re-sources Center, Enrollment Management
Spring 2013
Regular Faculty 70
Regular Staff 64
Adjuncts 183
P/T Temp Staff 66
P/T Student Workers 42
TOTAL 425
Defined by the CTC mission statement, the college evaluates its academic and service programs’ performance in alignment with three UAA core themes and objectives:
Teaching and Learning Core Theme: Student Learning Outcomes, State Needs
Student Success Core Theme: Access and Transition, Persistence and Goal Achievement
Community Partnerships: Community Partnerships
Guided by the CTC vision, values, and goal statement, the college sets performance targets and planning
priorities for its units in alignment with the corresponding UAA2017 strategic plan priorities:
2017 Priority A. Strengthen and Develop the Total UAA Instructional Program: (Successful and sustainable programs that sup-port student success, general education, workforce development, high-demand careers and high student demand)
Instruction driven by current and active professional and craft practice, academic research, or creative expression
2017 Priority C. Expand Educational Opportunity and Increase Student Success:
Focus on market share of Alaska’s college-bound students and their transition to higher education
Open access paired with retention and completion of educational goals
Efficiency of educational progress from entry to completion
2017 Priority E. Expand and Enhance the Public Square:
Community partnerships in training, education, research, and service
Educational partnerships to encompass pre-school through postgraduate continuing education
- Attachment #1 (PBAC Submission)
UAA is the only campus in the UA system that offers flight training. Funded since FY08 by TVEP (FY14 end of TVEP funding), the Flight Op-
erations & Training Manager and the Flight Operations Coordinator positions serve functions critical to the quality, success, and safety of
the flight training program. Funding the two requested posi-
tions will keep the doors open to the only full service avia-
tion school in the state of Alaska by sustaining the flight
training component of the Professional Piloting program.
Their continued support will ensure: 1) the practical appli-
cation of theory and skills in the cockpit and each student’s
readiness to stand for the FAA practical exam and certifica-
tion; 2) safety of flight training; 3) satisfaction of high de-
mand jobs by the transportation industry for pilots, the most
intensively trained of all transportation professionals (All
nine AY12 Bachelor of Science in Aviation Technology, Pro-
fessional Piloting graduates acquired flying jobs in Alaska).
- Attachment #2 (PBAC Submission)
In 2012 UAA entered into an SDI Productive Partnership with the Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District (MSBSD) to launch the first
middle college in the state. The Alaska Middle College School (AMCS), located at the Chugiak-Eagle River Campus, opened in August 2012
as a funded MSBSD-funded school with 43 high school juniors and seniors. De-
signed to expand to 175 students earning over 2,000 credits per year, AMCS offers
another educational choice for borough families and students; decreases time and
money required to complete a college degree; promotes rigorous academics in high
school; improves transition from high school to college; and increases college ac-
cess for all students. As a partner, UAA provides two major services for AMCS: 1)
college instruction and student services, and 2) facility space. While state formula
funding for students through the MSBSD provides the major sustainable funding
stream for these services, operation of this best practice program also requires a
contribution from UAA in the form of a coordinator position and facility enhance-
ments to provide: UAA/AMCS program coordination, advising and scheduling for
students, program reviews, bookstore operations, and videoconferencing services.
- Attachment #4 (CTC Internally Funded)
The majority of students entering UAA need remedial math and/or English. Most students who enroll in the remedial coursework never
move on to complete a college-level course. The overwhelming lack of success of our underprepared students unintentionally dismantles
our open enrollment policy, yet research has shown that additional intensive advising support can help many more at-risk developmen-
tal students succeed academically, and enter the workforce with high value credentials. The proposed specialized Advising position is
meant to intervene early and consistently to improve the academic, financial, and workforce outcomes for underprepared UAA students.
Effective advising to the underprepared population can harness their potential to increase UAA’s student credit hours, persistence and
graduation rates, and ultimately positively impact the pool of skilled Alaskan applicants for Alaska’s high demand jobs.
- Attachment #3 (PBAC Submission)
The requested faculty funding will sustain and develop both the dietetics and nutrition bachelor's degree programs added in 2010. Due to
continuing popularity of these programs an unanticipated enrollment boom threatens the sustainability of the BS Nutrition program in
which new enrollments are currently suspended. Without the requested faculty funding, admissions will remain suspended for AY14.
Additionally, academic quality is at stake: the growth in Dietetics
has triggered the requirement for a requested, third permanent
faculty position (currently TVEP Funded) in order to obtain program
accreditation from the American Dietetic Association Commission
on Dietetics Education (CADE). Sustainability of these degree pro-
grams also fosters student success by supporting other majors,
such as Nursing, Med-Lab Technology, Radiology, Dental Hygiene,
Early Childhood Education, Health/Physical Education & Recreation,
Hospitality/Restaurant Management and Nutrition Minor.
CTC mission, vision, values, and goals are reaffirmed annually through core theme alignment for structuring col-lege assessment, planning, and re-source allocation processes. The Col-lege Council of directors and chairs is responsible for the key components of organizational planning, resource allocation, and assessment of college effectiveness.
The College Council calendar and monthly meeting agenda follow an annual cycle that links and leverages the college pro-cesses directly with existing in-stitutional assessment, re-porting, planning, and budgeting processes.
CTC Component Criteria for Program Prioritization (after Dickeson, College Source for Reporting
1. History, development, and expectations of the program UAA Program Review (Quinquennial)
CTC Budget Operating Review (Annual)
Program Advisory Group Review (Annual)
2. External demand for the program 3. Internal demand for the program
4. Opportunity analysis of the program
5. Impact, justification, and overall essentiality of the program
6. Quality of program inputs and processes CTC Performance Report (Annual)
CTC Budget Operating Review (Annual) 7. Size, scope, and productivity of the program
8. Quality of program outcomes Program SLO/PDO Assessments (Annual)
Program Accreditation Reports (Various) 9. Revenue and other resources generated CTC Management Decision-Support Report (Monthly)
CTC Budget Operating Review (Annual) 10. Costs and other expenses associated with the programs
CTC plans to increase NGF contributions to support operations from increased offer-ings and enrollments in noncredit courses offered by the continuing education unit of the ESWFD division of the college.
CTC is continuing to analyze the relationship and data of CPDS Students and the Learning Resource Center (LRC). The LRC provides approximately 15K tutor and testing sessions a year with 70% of those sessions being utilized by CPDS students. CPDS math testing and/or tutoring fees could be implemented if appropriate and required.
CTC continues to pursue grant funding where appropriate and executable.
($30,000) Aviation Insurance: Unanticipated increase in CTC’s aviation insurance premium due to State of Alaska internal reallocation between the State of Alaska and the University of Alaska (10% in FY11 to 17.5% in FY13). CTC Aviation is required to pay 50% of the Univer-sity of Alaska insurance premium. CTC would need to increase student fees by $11.29 per flight hour to cover the additional cost. For a BSAT piloting graduate earning the minimum number of certificates and ratings, the new total cost on 200 hours equates to $8,080 or $40.40 per flight hour.
($14,500) Lease increase for the Chugiak Eagle River Campus (CERC) administrative and classroom space in the Eagle Center. A 6% annu-al increase for the leased space at the Eagle Center will go in effect FY14. FY13 appropriated funding for this lease is $240,607.00
No “soft” funds are used for current operations
Initiative FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 project-
ed
FY10 Dietetics & Nutrition Inst TVEP $64,300 $90,250 $90,250 $85,700 $81,400
FY12 AET AAS & Cert Programs $93,680 $93,700 $89,000
FY08 Flight Ops Personnel FY08 SB137 $125,558 $134,807 $129,304 $147,151 $110,600 $105,100
FY09 Apprenticeship Staff/Prom TVEP $30,558 $79,627 $77,045 $69,340 $65,900 $62,600
FY09 Welding/NDT AAS Prog TVEP $94,500 $94,525 $94,530 $89,800 $85,300
FY12 HPER BS Program $92,000 $92,000 $92,000
Total $156,116 $373,234 $391,124 $556,951 $537,700 $516,400
CTC’s PBAC request for the Aviation’s Flight Ops Personnel is intended to provide replacement funding for TVEP. If no funding is identified to continue these positions, which are critical to the Professional Piloting program, then funding will be reallocated within CTC at the deg-radation of another program or service.
As the Dean responsible for CTC’s wide range of academic programs and services, my strategy over the period of 2010-2013 has been to engage in organizational development structured around the regional accreditation standards of the Northwest Commission of College’s and University (NWCCU) and the CTC Component Criteria for Program Prioritization (after Dickeson, 2010). Utilizing these standards and UAA’s institutional accreditation cycles, CTC has developed a program assessment, planning, and resource allocation framework for im-proving college effectiveness.
In AY11, CTC underwent a functional-area alignment reorganization to differentiate and define the responsibilities of the associate deans within the college. Based on units’ functional role, the directors/chairs were re-appointed to report to either the Associate Dean for Aca-demic Affairs or the Associate Dean of Extended Studies and Workforce Development; the Chair of the College Preparatory & Developmen-tal Studies was re-appointed to report to the dean. At that time the Strategic Enrollment Management Coordinator was reclassified as the Director of Enrollment Management; and the reporting of Director of the Learning Resources Center was reassigned from the Fiscal Officer to the Dean.
In AY12, CTC developed the functional area leadership responsibilities as subcommittees of the College Council in order to define and de-velop the organizational indicators of effectiveness appropriate for each area. Initial work was done by the Council to align the college’s mission within the UAA core theme framework and to connect these indicators to a performance management framework to inform the resource prioritization processes in the college. Development of data sources and reports to assist the unit leadership with assessment and planning was pursued with staff resources and development within the Dean’s office.
In AY13-AY14, the Dean’s office is now moving to implement changes to the organizational structure to support the college operations which will provide the foundation for supporting the college’s three strategic programmatic initiatives being implemented in CTC for FY14: (a) Student Academic Support Services Advising Center Initiative; (b) Partnerships for Extended Studies and Workforce Development Initiative; and (c) Career and Technical Education Center of Excellence Initiative.
Attachment 1: FY14 PBAC - ($160,400) Aviation Technology Flight Training & Operations
Attachment 2: FY14 PBAC - ($121,521) Alaska Middle College Support
Attachment 3: FY14 PBAC - ($139,447) Dietetics and Nutrition BS Program Faculty
Attachment 4: FY14 CTC Funded - ($100,000) Advisor Preparatory & Developmental Studies
Attachment 5: FY13 Project/Initiative Status Report Dietetics & Nutrition Faculty
Attachment 6: FY13 Project/Initiative Status Report Eagle River & Aviation Lease
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #1)
1
ATTACHMENT VI
Incremental Request Form
FY14/FY15
Title: Aviation Technology Flight Operations & Training Personnel
(2 positions: Flight Operations & Training Manager, Flight Operations Coordinator-Scheduler-
Administrative Assistant)
MBU Priority Ranking #: 1 (Academic Programs)
1. Request Description/Strategic Purpose.
a. Provide a detailed narrative of the request. Include the purpose of the request and the market
demand the request is intended to meet. If applicable, include the number of students affected
and specific employer demand met.
PURPOSE
This request seeks funding of $160,400 for two positions critical to the success and safety of the
UAA Aviation Technology Division (ATD) flight training program: the Flight Operations
General Manager ($93,103) and the Flight Operations Coordinator ($67,300).
The UAA Aviation Technology Division is the FAA Part 141 certified aviation flight school in
the state of Alaska, and UAA is the only campus to offer in-house flight training within the
University of Alaska system. Professional Piloting is a magnet program for aviation, as a whole
attracting ~ 30% of each incoming class. Flight training is an integral component of the AAS and
BSAT Professional Piloting curriculum.
The flight operations manager has a significant impact on the quality and safety of the UAA
flight training program. The position can be thought of as the “sage” of practical application.
While regular faculty teach the classroom knowledge, theory and regulatory aspects of piloting,
it is the flight operations manager who teaches the skills and practical application of that
knowledge. The incumbent selects, manages, guides and performs quality control over the
Certified Flight Instructors (CFI) that do most of the day to day flight training. The manager
performs the final UAA quality check on the student “product” before they allowed to stand for
the FAA practical examination and certification.
The coordinator performs a key role in supporting student learning through preparation and
maintenance of student flight training files and the coordinator maintains records of the many
financial transactions attendant to a pay-as-you-go operation. Lastly, the coordinator works to
manage aircraft assignments in real time as maintenance breaks or flight delays occur.
The ability to run a safe operation is critical to the quality of a flight operations program. The
flight operations positions represent safety critical infrastructure within the Aviation Division
and play a pivotal role in risk management and professional supervision of our flight training
operation. Among the job duties of the flight operations manager, safety occupies 25% of the
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #1)
2
incumbent’s time to monitor and enforce flight school safety policies; to establish and maintain
the flight safety, risk assessment/mitigation, and hazard identification and tracking programs.
Additionally, the position maintains and updates emergency response procedures for aircraft
incidents, accidents and personnel injury.
In the long view, UAA has made remarkable progress building the flight training program from
scratch since inception in 2001. Taken together, our human and physical infrastructure
initiatives are an outstanding example of creativity and determination that has built the only
program of its kind in the state, a program recognized for safety and quality. The next natural
step in program development is to attain Aviation Accreditation Board International (AABI)
accreditation, a goal that seems doubtful if the flight training leadership is lost.
MARKET DEMAND (www.alaskaasp.com/Documents.aspx)
Transportation workers (such as commercial pilots, aircraft technicians, air traffic
controllers, etc.) are classified as high demand career fields; the most intensively trained
of all transportation workers is the commercial pilot.
Aviation is the 5th
largest industry in the State and represents about 8 percent of the gross
state product.
Alaskans experience 8 times more enplanements per capita than their nearest peer states
in the lower 48
Alaskans are 39 times more reliant on air freight.
NUMBER OF STUDENTS AFFECTED/EMPLOYER DEMAND MET
UAA currently serves 82 Professional Piloting majors. AY12 produced 9 graduates with a
BSAT Professional Piloting emphasis and 2 AAS Professional Piloting awards. All AY12
piloting graduates took flying jobs in Alaska.
b. How does the request advance the strategic priorities stated in the Cabinet Strategic Guidance in
Attachment V?
Under III. Operational Priorities and New Investment, and consistent with the Strategic
Direction Initiative and the 2017 Strategic Plan, the request advances these strategic priorities:
Access, Persistence, Completion (SDI 1 & 2)
Improve the effectiveness and efficiency with which students enter the university, receive
placement and advising, and navigate the many pathways through our programs to graduation
Among many other functions, the Flight Operations Manager acts as the student pilot’s guidance
counselor for flight. She is the one who identifies the student’s goals and personality and assigns
the appropriate flight instructor. She follows the student’s progress and steps in if the student
develops problems in any particular phase of training. Just as importantly, the Flight Operations
Manager manages the hiring and assignment of the Certified Flight Instructors (CFI) who form a
critical link to student success. Although the CFI’s are only labor pool employees, they are the
face of UAA flight training to the average student. Therefore, carefully choosing, assigning and
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #1)
3
managing and guiding the CFI pool has a huge impact on student success and persistence to
graduation.
Education for High Demand Jobs (SD1, 2, 3, & 5)
Career and Technical Education (CTE). With public and private partners, we must ensure
ongoing fiscal support for high demand CTE programs by addressing the challenges in the
current Alaska Technical Vocational Education Program (TVEP) allocation model.
This request is directly applicable to not only the Statewide Strategic Direction Initiative (SD1),
which notes Student Achievement and Attainment emerging as a strategic point of emphasis, but
also to UAA 2017 Strategic Priority A1 to “Build depth, reinforce success and ensure
sustainability in programs that support…workforce development, preparation for high demand
careers.”
The UA Office of Workforce Programs has recognized the importance of the two requested
positions by awarding TVEP funding for the FY08-FY13 budget years. ATD programs,
including the Flight Training component, fall within the Transportation category, one of the State
of Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development’s top five Alaska high demand job
areas. Transportation workers are classified as high demand and the most intensively trained of
all transportation workers is the commercial pilot. Replacement requirements for the
transportation and warehousing sector through 2020 total 1,692 jobs with job growth projected at
8.0% (Trends, October 2012). A healthy aviation program clearly serves the state’s interests.
Funding these positions will help sustain the output of high demand graduates. With funding, we
will continue to graduate between 5-10 Professional Pilots per year. Additionally, we will
continue to cross flow approximately 20-25 students per year from Professional Piloting to
Management and Air Traffic Control. These cross flow students are attracted to UAA by the
professional piloting program and often turn to a second aviation program if they cannot afford
piloting (most common), lack the aptitude (second most common), or lack the necessary
perseverance to overcome the obstacles to completing flight training (e.g. extended weather
delays, instructor shortages, equipment shortages, etc.). The majority of the students who switch
from piloting to another aviation program complete their degree. All aviation graduates are
classified as high demand in the classification of transportation.
c. Does the request fill a gap, remedy a problem, or respond to an external requirement (e.g.
accreditation or professional standard)?
The focus of this request is on sustainability and safety of a key aviation program. It fills a gap
in general funding available to support Flight Training—a degree completion requirement for
Professional Piloting students.
2. Internal MBU Reallocation. (Will any funds be reallocated internally to support this effort?)
Other than internal redistribution, no new general funds have ever been allocated to support flight
training since the program’s inception. Over the last 6 years, the Aviation Technology Division has
redirected funds internally as opportunities have presented themselves. Internal redistributions have
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #1)
4
been used to fund two other positions critical to flight training: a mechanic (transferred maintenance
technician position from the AMT program) and the Chief Flight Instructor (transferred and
redefined a position formerly belonging to the simulations unit).
3. Statewide System Performance Measures. What is the anticipated impact of the requested
increment on one or more of the SWS performance measures? If there is no obvious link between the
request and an existing SWS Performance Measure, it is not necessary to fill out this section.
a. For each performance measure related to this request, provide the estimated timeframe for
realization. Professional Piloting graduates are in the high demand job category of
transportation. The program has produced an average of 5.5 BSAT, Professional Piloting
emphasis over the last 7 years. In AYs ’10, ’11 and ’12 the BSAT program produced 8, 7 and 9
Professional Piloting graduates. This funding would ensure continued professional management
of Flight Training Operations – an integral component of the AAS and BSAT, Professional
Piloting curriculum.
b. What strategy-specific sub-metric will be used to demonstrate return on investment?
Which strategy specific sub-metric will be used to track intermediate progress. (Example:
Program major enrollment will be tracked as a preliminary indicator of eventual increases
in high-demand graduates.) Number of AAS and BSAT, Professional Piloting emphasis
graduates to continue at or above the running average of the previous seven years.
c. For this sub-metric, what is the current baseline, the expected change, and the timeframe
for realizing it if the requested funding is received? Seven year average of BSAT,
Professional Piloting emphasis – 5.57 graduates per academic year; AAS Professional Piloting
1.2 graduates per academic year.
4. Other Output Measures. If no SWS Performance Measure is applicable, what measure will you use
to assess the effectiveness of this investment? What change in the measure, from what baseline, within
what time frame? Provide specific estimates.)
General Funding of these positions would send a strong message to the Alaskan aviation industry
that the University ranks aviation among its important programs.
5. Total Amount Requested. (In the table below, list the general funds requested, any non-general
fund revenue that may be generated as a result of new general fund received, and the number of
positions requested. Enter the fiscal year(s) for which the request is being made.)
Request Type Fiscal Year General
Funds
Non-General
Funds
Generated
Number of
Positions
One-time
Base 2014 $160,400 2
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #2)
1
Incremental Request Form
FY14/FY15
Title Alaska Middle College School (AMCS) Partnership Support
MBU Priority Ranking #: 1 (Extended Studies & Workforce Development)
1. Request Description/Strategic Purpose.
The Community & Technical College is requesting $121,521 in base general funds to provide
critical support to the Alaska Middle College School (AMCS) partnership, a University of Alaska
Strategic Direction Initiative (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_VUeqvTsro). Identified as a
“Productive Partnership with Alaska’s Schools,” the AMCS program establishes the first middle
college in the State of Alaska and represents the first on-site dual enrollment model for high school
students. The program is designed to increase levels of educational attainment and student success
for students participating in the program, improving the transition from high school to college by
easing the procedural burden for secondary students and their parents.
AMCS is a partnership between the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) and the Matanuska-
Susitna Borough School District (MSBSD) to develop and operate a middle college at the UAA
Chugiak-Eagle River Campus (CERC) located at the Eagle Center in Eagle River, Alaska. AMCS
opened in August 2012 as a funded MSBSD-funded school with 43 high school juniors and seniors.
Once fully operational, AMCS is designed for 175 MSBSD students (both non-college and college
ready). These students will earn over 2,000 college credits each academic year.
Through a memorandum of agreement, UAA provides two major services for AMCS: 1) college
instruction and student services, and 2) facility space. While state formula funding for students
through the MSBSD provides the major sustainable funding stream for these services, operation of
this best practice program also requires a contribution from UAA, in the form of a coordinator
position and facility enhancements, to achieve the best possible outcomes for students.
1) College Instruction and Student Services (new program coordinator position):
College instruction includes college courses scheduled at CERC during the day. These courses are
taught by term and adjunct faculty and are offered in a sequence that allows fully college-ready high
school juniors to complete a majority of the course requirements for an associate of arts degree prior
to high school graduation. Student services support provided by UAA includes college advising
(related to the associate of arts degree), registration, and transcript reporting.
This request includes the establishment of a new Alaska Middle College School Coordinator to:
Provide overall UAA coordination for the AMCS program
Meet with MSBSD administrators and high school counselors and teachers to coordinate
goals, actions, and procedures related to the program
Develop a comprehensive advising plan for AMCS students
Develop a comprehensive AMCS student scheduling process
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #2)
2
Coordinate individual student schedules between MSBSD and UAA to allow for university
input focused on associate of arts degree completion
Develop a comprehensive orientation and enrollment day agenda for future academic years
Complete an extensive program review and make necessary programmatic changes to better
the program (in conjunction with the Community College Research Center from Teachers
College, Columbia University – contractually providing the development of a research plan
to serve as the program assessment plan)
Develop an annual report for the AMCS program
Contribute to program outcomes assessment
Work with appropriate UAA offices/services to develop and maintain currency of program
informational material
2) Facility (requested enhancements):
The facility space includes classrooms dedicated to the high school instruction portion of the
program, classrooms for the college courses offered to AMCS and other UAA students, college
faculty and high school teacher offices, and student common areas (e.g., student union, bookstore,
etc.).
The Chugiak-Eagle River Campus (CERC) has remodeled suites 122 and 234, formerly used as part
of a workforce development contract, into a videoconferencing classroom and a bookstore outlet.
These spaces provide Alaska Middle College School partnership support.
The campus did not previously have videoconferencing capabilities. Approximately 25% of CERC
courses cannot be scheduled in the Eagle Center due to a lack of classroom space. These courses
currently meet at Chugiak High School. The lease expense for suite 234 is being sought to provide
the videoconferencing capability so that the campus may:
Virtually participate in main campus and statewide events
Enable tele-advising and course delivery to the AMCS partnership
Increase participation of faculty in professional development opportunities related to the
AMCS program
Increase staff participation in meetings and trainings related to the AMCS program
The lease expense for suite 122 is being sought to provide:
Student access to UAA textbooks, apparel, and class supplies
Student access to prepared food and beverages
Mat-Su Borough School District student access to free and reduced lunch offerings as part of
partnership support for the AMCS
a. How does the request advance the strategic priorities stated in the Cabinet Strategic Guidance in
Attachment V?
Under III. Operational Priorities and New Investment, and consistent with the Strategic
Direction Initiative and the 2017 Strategic Plan, the request advances these strategic priorities:
Access, Persistence, Completion (SDI 1 & 2)
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #2)
3
Improve the effectiveness and efficiency with which students enter the university, receive placement
and advising, and navigate the many pathways through our programs to graduation
AMCS is clearly a productive partnership with Alaska’s schools—in this case, the Matanuska-
Susitna Borough School District. The program operating guidelines lessen the burden of college
attendance by shifting the responsibility of activities such as registration, grade transfer and
reporting, and college attendance approval, from students and parents to the school district and
university.
Enrollment in AMCS provides Matanuska-Susitna Borough students with a secondary school option
to complete their high school diploma (grades 11–12) on a college campus, with a curriculum
ensuring college and career readiness, and the opportunity for attainment of individual educational
goals at UAA. The partnership allows students to successfully bridge the transition between high
school and college, and from the first to second year of college. AMCS provides more choice for
borough students and allows families to provide a college experience for their children at an
affordable cost.
Through AMCS, the school district and university provide greater accountability to the people of
Alaska. MSBSD does so by offering another educational choice for borough families and students.
This choice decreases the time and money required to complete a college degree, promotes rigorous
academics in high school, improves transition from high school to college, and increases college
access for all students. UAA provides greater accountability through more efficient use of
classroom space, additional daytime course offerings for traditional college students, and early
advising and intervention.
Effectively align our multi-campus MAU for student success: AMCS students will have the
opportunity to earn a MSBSD high school diploma, become academically ready for college
courses or career training, and earn up to 60 credits towards an associate of arts degree. This
degree is transferable within the University of Alaska system and the credits earned are also
transferable to colleges and universities outside of the state. AMCS students will navigate a
seamless post-secondary transition into the University of Alaska system. Finally, the AMCS
partnership will contribute to filling the need for high wage, high demand jobs with
Alaskans. Student achievement and attainment are enhanced by reducing students’ time to
completion of a college degree. For those non-college ready students enrolled in AMCS, the
school environment (on a college campus) encourages a greater focus on becoming college-
ready.
To effectively and efficiently provide this partnership support to the AMCS program, a full-time
AMCS coordinator is required. As noted earlier, this position would:
Provide overall UAA coordination for the AMCS program
Meet with MSBSD administrators and high school counselors and teachers to coordinate
goals, actions, and procedures related to the program
Develop a comprehensive advising plan for AMCS students
Develop a comprehensive AMCS student scheduling process
Coordinate individual student schedules between MSBSD and UAA to allow for university
input focused on associate of arts degree completion
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #2)
4
Develop a comprehensive orientation and enrollment day agenda for future academic years
Complete an extensive program review and make necessary programmatic changes to better
the program (in conjunction with the Community College Research Center from Teachers
College, Columbia University – contractually providing the development of a research plan
to serve as the program assessment plan)
Develop an annual report for the AMCS program
Contribute to program outcomes assessment
Work with appropriate UAA offices/services to develop and maintain currency of program
informational material
Suite 234 will provide partnership support for the AMCS program. The room will be utilized to
provide for tele-advising of AMCS students with high school counselors and UAA academic
advisors. The room will also be used to deliver courses to AMCS students.
Effectively align our multi-campus MAU for student success: Suite 122 at the Eagle Center
will align the auxiliary services available to students on the main campus for students at the
extension site on the Chugiak Eagle River Campus, including AMCS students. The
bookstore outlet will be patterned after the outlet at the University Center.
Develop a balanced and sustainable content delivery system consisting of e-learning and
traditional classroom platforms: Suite 234 will expand UAA capabilities to deliver course
content to a number of locations in the state, thereby increasing access to students living in
the Chugiak and Eagle River communities to courses and programs offered statewide,
including AMCS students.
Under IV. Infrastructure Priorities, continuing to invest in our infrastructure to sustain and
strengthen our existing facilities, the request advances these strategic priorities:
Maintenance, and, where necessary, the upgrading, of previous infrastructure investments
Information technology with emphasis on security, reliability, and inter-campus network
connectivity to support faculty, staff, and students
Suite 234 represents the continued investment in our infrastructure that increases campus
connectivity in support of faculty, staff and students and our partnership with Mat-Su Borough
School District. The videoconferencing capabilities enable faculty to join in professional
development opportunities, staff to join meetings and training, and students to enroll in courses
previously unavailable to them. Students will also gain access to tele-advising and other student
support services.
b. Does the request fill a gap, remedy a problem, or respond to an external requirement (e.g.
accreditation or professional standard)?
As discussed in the request description, the AMCS program establishes the first middle college in
the State of Alaska and represents the first on-site dual enrollment model. The program is designed
to ease the procedural burden for secondary students and their parents, to improve the transition from
high school to college, and to increase levels of educational attainment and student success for
students participating in the program.
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #2)
5
Once fully operational, AMCS is designed for 175 MSBSD students, both non-college and college
ready. These students will earn over 2,000 college credits each academic year.
Both suites 122 and 234 provide enhancements for the Chugiak-Eagle River Campus that were
previously unattainable. The bookstore outlet will provide access to auxiliary student services
important to student success. It is also key to providing food service as part of our commitment to
the partnership with Mat-Su Borough School District on the AMCS program.
Current Highlights
1. AMCS memorandum of agreement (for two academic years) signed in June 2012
2. AMCS opened its doors August 16, 2012, to 43 high school juniors and seniors
84% juniors (36) and 16% seniors (7)
26% fully college-ready (11)
37% partially college-ready (16)
29 AMCS students registered for 91 classes in Fall 2012 semester (approximately 300
SCHRS)
AMCS students assigned unique identifier in Banner; allows for accurate data pulls for
future analysis
2. Internal MBU Reallocation. (Will any funds be reallocated internally to support this effort?)
While initial start-up work was assigned to current faculty and staff (particularly, the CERC director,
CERC student services manager, and CTC associate dean), a permanently funded coordinator
position is required as the program matures.
3. Statewide System Performance Measures.1 What is the anticipated impact of the requested
increment on one or more of the SWS performance measures? If there is no obvious link between the
request and an existing SWS Performance Measure, it is not necessary to fill out this section.
a. For each performance measure related to this request, provide the estimated timeframe for
realization. (Example: This increment will increase student credit hours by FY15, because
FY14 will be used to hire the additional professor. University-generated revenue and student
credit hours will be impacted in FY15 by the additional course offerings provided by the new
professor.)
Enrolled Unduplicated (college ready): AY13 - 31 students, AY14 Est. - 75 students
Student Credit Hours: AY13 - 739 SCHR, AY14 Est. - 1,400 SCHR
b. What strategy-specific sub-metric will be used to demonstrate return on investment?
Which strategy specific sub-metric will be used to track intermediate progress. (Example:
Program major enrollment will be tracked as a preliminary indicator of eventual increases
in high-demand graduates.)
1 For reference, please see UAA Performance ‘11, pp 33 ff. at
http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/institutionaleffectiveness/upload/Performance-11_web-version.pdf
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #2)
6
c. For this sub-metric, what is the current baseline, the expected change, and the timeframe
for realizing it if the requested funding is received? (Example: In Fall 2010, there were 120
program majors enrolled. This increment would grow enrollment by 20 majors in FY14.
Strategy Sub-
Metric
Intermediate
Progress
Current Baseline Expected Change Timeframe
SCHR of AMCS
students
Semester Banner
reports
739 SCHR 2000 Total SCHR AY2015
4. Other Output Measures. If no SWS Performance Measure is applicable, what measure will you use
to assess the effectiveness of this investment? What change in the measure, from what baseline, within
what time frame? Provide specific estimates.)
SCHRS earned by AMCS students
Associate of arts degrees awarded to AMCS students
Number of AMCS students attending college after high school
Number of AMCS students attending any University of Alaska institution after high school
Number of AMCS students completing a baccalaureate degree after high school
All of the AMCS post high school measures will also be compared against measures of students not
participating in the AMCS program (e.g., 6-year baccalaureate graduation rate of AMCS students vs. the
overall 6-year baccalaureate graduation rate for UA students).
5. Total Amount Requested. (In the table below, list the general funds requested, any non-general
fund revenue that may be generated as a result of new general fund received, and the number of
positions requested. Enter the fiscal year(s) for which the request is being made.)
Request Type Fiscal Year General
Funds
Non-General
Funds
Generated
Number of
Positions
One-time
Base 14 $121,521 1
Personnel: Administrative Professional (grade 79), 48 weeks – salary, benefits, travel, commodities,
equipment = $83,169
Lease/Facility:
Suite 234: 680 sq. ft.*$1.70/sq. ft.*12 months = $13,872
Suite 122: 1200 sq. ft.*$1.70/sq. ft.*12 months = $24,480
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #3)
1
Incremental Request Form
FY14/FY15
Title This funding requests a full-time faculty position and additional instructional costs required to support
the BS programs in Dietetics and Nutrition.
MBU Priority Ranking #: 2 (Academics Programs)
1. Request Description/Strategic Purpose.
a. Provide a detailed narrative of the request. Include the purpose of the request and the
market demand the request is intended to meet. If applicable, include the number of
students affected and specific employer demand met. For research programs, include
areas of state needs met and external funding source (i.e., National Science Foundation.)
This funding request is for a full-time faculty position and additional instructional costs required
to support the Bachelor of Science programs in Dietetics and Nutrition.
In the original degree development proposal for the Bachelor of Science Degrees in Dietetics and
Nutrition, this faculty position was determined to be absolutely critical. The degree programs
were approved by UA Board of Regents (Sept. 2009), and are now fully implemented. In
August 2012 funding was secured for the first Dietetics and Nutrition position requested. Due to
the large growth in these degree programs a second faculty position is necessary for the
operation and success of these two new degrees, and required for the accreditation of the
dietetics program.
b. How does the request advance the strategic priorities stated in the Cabinet Strategic
Guidance in Attachment V?
This request supports the Education for High Demand Jobs in Health. The present and long-term
employment opportunities demand for nutrition and dietetics graduates remains high. According
to the Bureau of Labor Statistics projections from the 2008-2009 Occupational Outlook
Handbook: “Employment of dietitians and nutritionists is expected to increase 9% during the
2006-16 projection decade; about as fast as the average for all occupations. Job growth will
result from an increasing emphasis on disease prevention through improved dietary habits and
nutrition education. A growing and aging population will boost demand for nutritional
counseling and treatment in hospitals, residential care facilities, schools, correctional facilities,
community health programs, and home healthcare agencies. Public interest in nutrition and
increased emphasis on health education and prudent lifestyles also will spur demand, especially
in food service management.”
This agrees with the State of Alaska, Department of Labor publication: Alaska Occupational
Forecast to 2014, where a needed increase of approximately 25.3% is projected in healthcare
practitioners and technical workers. These factors appear to indicate anticipated steady growth
of employment opportunities in the dietetics and nutrition field.
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #3)
2
c. Does the request fill a gap, remedy a problem, or respond to an external requirement (e.g.
accreditation or professional standard)?
Without funding for a second Dietetics and Nutrition position over half of Dietetics and Nutrition
courses would be taught by an adjuncts, which does not meet the accreditation standards. UAA
assured the visiting accreditation team from the American Dietetic Association Commission on
Dietetics Education (CADE) that resources were in place to hire required full-time/tenured
faculty positions per CADE standards/requirements.
2. Internal MBU Reallocation. (Will any funds be reallocated internally to support this effort?)
UAA CTC will continue to support the program with central resources for faculty professional
development, IT help desk support and distributions for equipment needs.
3. Statewide System Performance Measures.1 What is the anticipated impact of the requested
increment on one or more of the SWS performance measures? If there is no obvious link between the
request and an existing SWS Performance Measure, it is not necessary to fill out this section.
a. For each performance measure related to this request, provide the estimated timeframe for
realization. (Example: This increment will increase student credit hours by FY15, because
FY14 will be used to hire the additional professor. University-generated revenue and student
credit hours will be impacted in FY15 by the additional course offerings provided by the new
professor.)
Currently the student credit hour production for Dietetics and Nutrition is 3,550. Courses for
Dietetics and Nutrition are at 93% capacity with a SCHRS increase 10% from FY12 to FY13.
It’s projected that this number will continue to grow if funding is secured for additional credit
offerings and will increase to approximately 4,000 SCHRS in FY 14 (based on BANNER data).
Due to more robust enrollment numbers than originally anticipated, a second faculty member is
being requested along with 18 credits (6 each, 3 credit Dietetics and Nutrition courses) to cover
required courses taught by adjunct faculty, 9 credits of overload during the summer for Nutrition
and Dietetics course updates required by CADE and 2 credits for summer adjunct coordination
(required to support the 24 credits taught by adjuncts during the summer months.) Currently a
search for a tenure track Assistant Professor in Dietetics and Nutrition is being conducted; if
funds were allotted this position could be filled with first alternate from this search, therefore
there would be immediate realization of student credit hour production.
1 For reference, please see UAA Performance ‘11, pp 33 ff. at
http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/institutionaleffectiveness/upload/Performance-11_web-version.pdf
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #3)
3
The courses are:
DN A355 Weigh Mgmt. & Eating Dis 3cr 1 section 25 students
DN A315 World Food Patterns 3cr 1 section 25 students
DN A215 Sports Nutrition 3cr 2 sections 50 students
DN A350 Foodservice & Quantity 3cr 1 section 25 students
DN A151 Nutr. Through the Life Span 3 cr. 2 sections 90 students
DN A203 Nutr. for the Health Sciences 3 cr. 4 sections 185 students
The above courses support the Dietetics and Nutrition degrees. Also note that DN A151 and
DN A203 are support courses for Dental Hygiene, Early Childhood Development,
Hospitality/Restaurant Management, HPER, Medical Laboratory Technology, Nursing, and
Radiology Majors. Classes fill to capacity and with projected future growth in Health Sciences at
UAA, additional sections will be necessary.
b. What strategy-specific sub-metric will be used to demonstrate return on investment? Which
strategy specific sub-metric will be used to track intermediate progress. (Example: Program
major enrollment will be tracked as a preliminary indicator of eventual increases in high-demand
graduates.)
This funding request will continue to contribute to teaching and learning by providing instruction
that meets relevant national accreditation standards. The program will continue to graduate
Dietetic Interns who are prepared to complete the National Registered Dietitian Exam necessary
to become a Registered Dietitian (RD).
The total degrees awarded for the next 5 years are projected at:
Degrees/graduates: ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ’16 Total 5 YR
B.S. Dietetics (Registered Dietitians) 5 5 5 8 8 31
B.S. Nutrition 0 15 20 35 40 110
c. For this sub-metric, what is the current baseline, the expected change, and the timeframe for
realizing it if the requested funding is received? (Example: In Fall 2010, there were 120
program majors enrolled. This increment would grow enrollment by 20 majors in FY14.
Enrollment trends have been difficult to project for the new degrees as there is no past history to
base analysis on. Currently new admissions to the BS Nutrition are suspended for AY ’12-’13
due to unanticipated enrollment boom. It was projected in the first year of the implementation of
the new degree there might be approximately 25 declared majors. In actuality there were 83
(BANNER data/department advising records). In the BS Dietetics degree there are 134 declared
majors (Banner). It was quickly determined said enrollment numbers could not be sustainable
given the level of faculty funding. Without identified hard funding for the second faculty
position, it has been recommended to Dean Karen Schmitt that admissions to the BS Nutrition
degree be suspended again for AY ’13-’14 until University determination is made regarding
resource allocation for the program.
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #3)
4
Holistically, given the current UA budget climate, it might be necessary and prudent for the
University to ponder if the BS Nutrition degree is sustainable.
4. Other Output Measures. If no SWS Performance Measure is applicable, what measure will you use
to assess the effectiveness of this investment? What change in the measure, from what baseline, within
what time frame? Provide specific estimates.)
With regard to other UA and UAA programs, Dietetics and Nutrition courses foster student
success by supporting other majors such as Nursing, Med-Lab Technology, Radiology, Dental
Hygiene, Early Childhood Education, Health/Physical Education & Recreation,
Hospitality/Restaurant Management and Nutrition Minor. Approximately 497 UA Nursing
Majors completed DN A203 Nutrition for the Health Sciences in academic year 2011 (Banner
data).
The employment rate is anecdotal at this time as no data has been collected pertaining to the two
new degrees. Alaska Department of Labor data indicates employment opportunities exist (State of
Alaska, Department of Labor publication – Alaska Occupational Forecast to 2014). Further, another
indicator might be the success of the UAA Dietetic Internship program. Of all students completing
the program and then going on to pass the National Registered Dietitian Exam, all graduates (100%) are
successfully placed (if they seek employment). On April 27, 2012 the 17th class of UAA DI interns
will graduate. To date, 48%, or 32, of the program graduates have remained in Alaska and
currently work in the Alaska healthcare industry.
5. Total Amount Requested. (In the table below, list the general funds requested, any non-general
fund revenue that may be generated as a result of new general fund received, and the number of
positions requested. Enter the fiscal year(s) for which the request is being made.)
Request Type Fiscal Year General
Funds
Non-General
Funds
Generated
Number of
Positions
One-time
Base 2014 139,447 1 faculty plus
adjuncts for
29 credits
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #4)
1
Incremental Request Form
FY14/FY15
(FY14 CTC Internally Funded Initiative)
Title Developmental Student Success Advisor to serve underprepared students enrolled in
CTC College Preparatory and Developmental Studies (CPDS) (80% of which are declared
majors in Programs offered outside of CTC).
MBU Priority Ranking #:
1. Request Description/Strategic Purpose.
Request Description
This request comprises 1 FTE specialized developmental advisor whose workload is
dedicated to supporting the early and first-year transition success of all underprepared
students entering UAA Anchorage campus. Lacking this intensive, focused advising
intervention, the historical pattern of high attrition will likely continue, undermining
existing UA open enrollment philosophy and policy. The Developmental Student
Success Advisor will provide full-time, student-centered professional advising services to
underprepared students enrolled in developmental math and English courses delivered by
the College Preparatory and Developmental Studies (CPDS) department, of the
Community & Technical College (CTC). This focused advising serves the entire UAA
Anchorage campus in that 80% of CPDS students required to remediate math and/or
English competencies as a condition of admission are declared majors in colleges other
than CTC. The Advisor will coordinate services with CPDS faculty to ensure that
advising is closely aligned with current best practices in the field of developmental
education instruction.
Specialized developmental advising includes close collaboration with CPDS faculty in
support of curriculum through non-instructional, in-person and online support services to
include: individual and group advising for life-work-school balance; obtaining and
managing financial aid and debt literacy; academic and career planning; stress
management; career exploration and interest assessment; behavioral coaching for
academic success; and problem solving and conflict resolution skills. (Specific goals of
developmental advising are described below.)
Rationale
The majority of incoming UAA students require academic remediation in math, English
or both, and are required to enroll in developmental coursework to advance into/through
academic programs. According to UAA Offices of Institutional Effectiveness and
Institutional Research, “the number of students who enroll in developmental or college
preparatory courses at UAA now represents 59% of all first-time-full-time (FTFT)
certificate- and degree-seeking students” (OIE, 2011, p. 47). At the Anchorage Campus,
39% of the Fall 2009 Entry Cohort1
were designated as academically underprepared (UP).
These students must enroll in developmental math and/or English and successfully
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #4)
2
complete all courses with a C grade or better in order to progress into gateway courses of
standard undergraduate curriculum. At UAA Anchorage Campus, students requiring
developmental coursework enroll in the remediation programs offered by the College
Preparatory and Developmental Studies (CPDS) department of the Community &
Technical College (CTC).
Unfortunately, the need for developmental coursework winds up acting as an
insurmountable barrier for most students.
A substantial number of UP students whose placement test scores mandate CPDS courses
never actually register for any courses, becoming effectively an ‘invisible’ cohort of
college ‘drop outs’ even prior to admission. Of those UP students who do enroll in
developmental coursework, less than 20% actually successfully complete a college-level
course after one year. For example, of the Fall 2009 UP entering FTFT UP cohort, 84%
were enrolled in remedial courses after one year. At the one year point, 59% were
successful in at least one remedial course, but only 39% enrolled in a subsequent course.
Of those who did enroll in a subsequent course, 31% were successful.
Of all the UP students in this 2009 cohort, a total of 18% were successful in a college
level course (UAA, 2011, p. 19).
To add to the unsuccessful academic outcomes, many underprepared students extend
development enrollment to qualify for federal financial aid that later is unavailable for
college-level coursework. Over several semesters or years of unsuccessful developmental
course enrollment, many at-risk students accrue significant loan debt, tied to increasing
loan default rates.
Research has shown that additional intensive advising support can help many more at-
risk developmental students succeed academically, and to enter the workforce with high
value credentials. The proposed Advising position is meant to intervene early and
consistently to improve the academic, financial and workforce outcomes for
underprepared UAA students.
Developmental Advising Goals
Institutional Level: Support open enrollment element of UA/UAA/CTC mission
through specialized advising; increase developmental student success to increase
student credit hour production; retention and graduation rate.
Program/Service Delivery Level: Increase student persistence while reducing early
attrition; increase student success in subsequent coursework at college-level through
focused advising in close alignment with CPDS academic curricula.
Student Level: Understand costs and benefits of developmental education; increase
college readiness and knowledge/skills in multiple domains (affective, cognitive,
behavior) for efficient and effective transition into college level coursework.
Developmental Advising Goals Aligned to Strategic Priorities
UA SDI
Theme
UAA 2017
CTC Strategic
Goal
CTC
Core
Theory of
Action
Target
Populatio
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #4)
3
Theme n
Student
Achievement and
Attainment
Effect 3:
Certificate and
degree attainment
rates exceed
national averages
for peer
institutions.
Academic
advising and
financial aid
advising are
effective in
retaining
students and
facilitating
their
satisfactory
academic
progress;
Developmenta
l education
enables
students to
transition to
college level
courses and to
graduate
without course
failures or
non-
completions.
Priority C -
Expand
educational
opportunity and
increase student
success:
improve
transition to
higher education
with an
emphasis on
serving Alaska
Natives, other
underrepresente
d populations,
and first-
generation
college students
Improve quality
of performance
through
continuous focus
on the
teaching/learnin
g process, the
career and
academic
advising process
and college-
wide customer
service
Student
Succes
s
Remediation
in English
and math will
have a
positive and
significant
effect on
individual
student
cognition,
behavior, and
future action
to facilitate
entry into and
success in the
regular
undergraduat
e curriculum.
Any UAA
Anchorage
Campus
student
enrolled in
one or
more
CPDS
courses.
Notes: 1Most recent year of UAA analysis reported for this population.
a. How does the request advance the strategic priorities stated in the Cabinet Strategic
Guidance in Attachment V?
This request directly responds to SDI 1: Student Achievement and Attainment.
Intensive advising support to at-risk, developmental students addresses both student
and institutional goals of:
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #4)
4
1) increasing student persistence in CPDS courses to efficiently and effectively
transition into gateway (college-level, credit bearing) courses that count
toward certificates and degrees (with corresponding effects of increasing
student credit hour production to increase tuition revenue and decrease
demand for remediation, as well as reserving student financial aid for later
credit producing courses, reducing student debt load and potential loan default
rates; and
2) reducing current high developmental student attrition rate by accelerating
satisfactory academic progress (with corresponding effects of increasing
effective transition into certificate and degree programs to potentially create
positive impact on UAA 6 year graduation rate).
b. Does the request fill a gap, remedy a problem, or respond to an external requirement
(e.g. accreditation or professional standard)?
This request addresses several challenges currently facing the UAA Anchorage Campus
and CTC College communities:
1. High early attrition rate of incoming and first-year students.
2. High rate of academic failure of developmental students with associated human,
financial, and institutional costs.
3. Inefficient use of institutional resources under current model of developmental
education provision, e.g. high cost of program delivery with low level of success as
measured in terms of student success in subsequent coursework.
2. Internal MBU Reallocation. (Will any funds be reallocated internally to support this
effort?)
1. Statewide System Performance Measures.1 What is the anticipated impact of the
requested increment on one or more of the SWS performance measures? If there is no
obvious link between the request and an existing SWS Performance Measure, it is not
necessary to fill out this section.
a. For each performance measure related to this request, provide the estimated
timeframe for realization. (Example: This increment will increase student credit
hours by FY15, because FY14 will be used to hire the additional professor.
University-generated revenue and student credit hours will be impacted in FY15 by
the additional course offerings provided by the new professor.)
1. 6-Year Graduation Rate: Percentage of first-time full-time baccalaureate degree-
seeking students in a given fall semester who earn a degree within six years.
1 For reference, please see UAA Performance ‘11, pp 33 ff. at
http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/institutionaleffectiveness/upload/Performance-11_web-version.pdf
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #4)
5
Substantially increasing the number of students who succeed in remediation,
while also accelerating their rate of transition into college-level work, results in
more prepared students persisting longer to meet their academic goals. The effect
of these changes in the CPDS student population will positively impact UAA
Anchorage Campus-wide graduation rate. Effects of this will be evident in Fall
2014 retention rate increase, with contribution to improved UAA graduation rate
beginning as early as 2015 for 2-year certificates and degrees awards levels, and
2017 baccalaureate awards level.
2. Student Credit Hours: Number of student credit hours attempted, all levels,
including audits.
Because CPDS students declare majors of all UAA Anchorage Campus colleges
(80% outside of CTC), intensive advising support will directly contribute to
increased credit hour production of the entire Anchorage campus. Specifically,
proposed intensive advising services to at-risk, developmental students will: 1)
prevent early attrition from required remedial courses; and 2) accelerate
successful progression through required remedial courses for more efficient
transition into gateway courses. The result of increased retention for successful
transition will be additional credit hours produced by student persistence through
the remedial sequence.
b. What strategy-specific sub-metric will be used to demonstrate return on
investment? Which strategy specific sub-metric will be used to track
intermediate progress. (Example: Program major enrollment will be tracked as
a preliminary indicator of eventual increases in high-demand graduates.)
1. Undergraduate Retention: Proportion of first-time full-time undergraduate
certificate-and degree-seeking students enrolled in a given full semester that re-
enrolled in an undergraduate program anywhere in the UA system in the
following fall semester.
2. Developmental Skills Core Indicator: Success in Subsequent College-level Work:
Proportion of underprepared students that successfully completes both
dervelopmental0level coursework AND their first college-level English or Math
class within one year of entry.
c. For this sub-metric, what is the current baseline, the expected change, and the
timeframe for realizing it if the requested funding is received? (Example: In Fall
2010, there were 120 program majors enrolled. This increment would grow
enrollment by 20 majors in FY14.
1. Retention among developmental students is demonstrated by their persistence in
developmental courses to point of successful completion, demonstrated by timely
transition into subsequent first college-level course. Because many CPDS students
fail to complete their first course, In Fall 2009, 39% (460) of UP cohort enrolled in a
subsequent course after 1 year. An increase in persistence of 2% is anticipated.
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #4)
6
2. Currently as noted, about 20% of developmental students are successful in a college-
level course after 1 year in remediation. Using 2009 Fall UP Cohort data as a
baseline, 211 of original cohort of 1,169 were successful in a subsequent college
course. Applying a higher target of 25% success in a subsequent college course, this
increment would grow the number of incoming prepared students by 81 students,
realizing a 5% increase.
1. Other Output Measures. If no SWS Performance Measure is applicable, what measure
will you use to assess the effectiveness of this investment? What change in the measure, from
what baseline, within what time frame? Provide specific estimates.)
5. Total Amount Requested. (In the table below, list the general funds requested, any non-
general fund revenue that may be generated as a result of new general fund received, and the
number of positions requested. Enter the fiscal year(s) for which the request is being made.)
Request Type Fiscal Year General
Funds
Non-General
Funds
Generated
Number of
Positions
One-time
Base FY14 $100,000. 1.0 FTE
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #5)
1
Project/Initiative Status Report
FY13
Project/Initiative Title: Dietetics & Nutrition Faculty
Awarded: $116,000
Org #: 11868
Contact: Timothy Doebler
E-mail: twdoebler @uaa.alaska.edu
This document is intended to provide basic assessment information for each special project or
initiative program funded in FY13 (identified in Attachment IV). This includes priority program
funding from the Legislature, base funding through the UAA internal reallocation process, or
one-time funds received. This evaluation will be used to assess the effectiveness of funded
projects and programs and as part of the internal scan for the upcoming accreditation process.
Please provide a brief paragraph on each question, with the total document totaling no more than
two pages.
1. What were the original objectives of this initiative? (Include goals, expected
outcomes, what you hoped to accomplish.)
This request is making the implementation of the new B.S. in Nutrition, and the
implementation of the new B.S. in Dietetics possible. This faculty position was necessary
to the operation and success of these two new degrees, and required for the accreditation
of the dietetics program. UAA assured the visiting accreditation team from the American
Dietetic Association Commission on Dietetics Education (CADE) that resources were in
place to hire required full-time/tenured faculty position per CADE. With this initiative
funding UAA has been able to sustain the degree programs and meet accreditation
standards.
2. What was accomplished? (What actually happened? Include personnel hiring, status
of funds spent, and any changes to original plans, goals, or objectives. What goals were
met? Include specific outcomes of the project or initiative.)
With the initiative funding a Term Associate Professor of Dietetics and Nutrition was
appointed for FY13 to teach 18 credits. Additionally this Professor was assigned the task
of Advisor for the Nutrition Majors (approx. 42 advisees). Currently there is a tenure
track Assistant/Associate Professor of Dietetics and Nutrition search being conducted to
permanently fill the position. The initiative funding was used to hire the additional
adjuncts needed to teach 9 credits of Dietetics and Nutrition courses which supports
Dietetic and Nutrition students along with the following majors: Dental Hygiene, Early
Childhood Development, Hospitality/Restaurant Management, HPER, Medical
Laboratory Technology, Nursing, and Radiology Majors.
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #5)
2
3. What has been the impact? (How has UAA benefited from this initiative? Were
additional courses offered or students served? What research was completed, what
knowledge gained? What are the indicators that point to the impacts? How do the
results further the strategic objectives of UAA 2017? How has the initiative affected UA
Performance Measures?)
Currently the student credit hour production for Dietetics and Nutrition is 3,550. Courses
for Dietetics and Nutrition are at 93% capacity. The Dietetics and Nutrition Program has
seen a 10% increase in student credit hour production from FY12 to FY13.
The following classes were offered in FY13 in Dietetics and Nutrition:
DN A355 Weigh Mgmt & Eating Dis 3cr 1 section 24 students
DN A315 World Food Patterns 3cr 1 section 22 students
DN A215 Sports Nutrition 3cr 2 sections 49 students
DN A350 Foodservice & Quantity 3cr 1 section 18 students
DN A151 Nutr. Through the Life Span 3 cr. 2 sections 60 students
DN A203 Nutr. for the Health Sciences 3 cr. 4 sections 220 students
In May of 2013 the Dietetics and Nutrition program is expected to graduate 5 students
from the Bachelor of Science in Dietetics and 6 students from the Bachelors of Nutrition
Degree (these are the first graduates completing matriculation).
4. What are the expected future outcomes of this initiative? (Where is this initiative
going next? How will this initiative continue to benefit UAA and its constituents? What is
the anticipated future impact on UA Performance Measures?)
This funding request will continue to contribute to teaching and learning by providing
instruction that meets relevant national accreditation standards. The program will
continue to graduate Dietetic Interns who are prepared to complete the National
Registered Dietitian Exam necessary to become a Registered Dietitian (RD).
5. Amount Spent. (As of month end: ___February 2013_____)
Expense Category YTD Expense Projected Expense Unspent Balance
Personnel 86,509.90 30,130.18 0
Non-personnel
Total 86,509.90 30,130.18 0
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #6)
1
Project/Initiative Status Report
FY13
Project/Initiative Title: Eagle River/Aviation Lease
Awarded: $32,900
Org #: 17018 & 17019
Contact: Coy Gullett
E-mail: clgullett @uaa.alaska.edu
This document is intended to provide basic assessment information for each special project or
initiative program funded in FY13 (identified in Attachment IV). This includes priority program
funding from the Legislature, base funding through the UAA internal reallocation process, or
one-time funds received. This evaluation will be used to assess the effectiveness of funded
projects and programs and as part of the internal scan for the upcoming accreditation process.
Please provide a brief paragraph on each question, with the total document totaling no more than
two pages.
1. What were the original objectives of this initiative? (Include goals, expected
outcomes, what you hoped to accomplish.)
The goal of the lease-related requests was to continue to support ongoing operations for
the Aviation Technology Division and the Chugiak Eagle River Campus (CERC).
Additionally, the request was meant to support partnership and initiative expansion for
CERC.
The Aviation Technology Division pays an annual land lease for two buildings located on
Merrill Field. The Municipality of Anchorage raised the rate 11.7% beginning in FY12,
for a total increase of $10,400.
The Chugiak Eagle River Campus (CERC) is fortunate to hold most classes at no charge
in Anchorage School District high school buildings, but we also lease administrative and
classroom space in the Eagle Center. In FY13 we expected the annual CPI increase to
total $9,000.
In addition, CTC intended to add one room in the CERC Eagle Center for four faculty
offices to support a new collaborative agreement with the College of Arts and Sciences to
share two faculty, which will support an agreement with the Matanuska-Susitna Borough
School District (MSBSD) to provide a middle college experience for 120 high school
students. Two additional MSBSD faculty needed offices in the building as well. The
annual cost for the faculty office space was expected to be $13,500.
CTC PBAC FY14 (Attachment #6)
2
2. What was accomplished? (What actually happened? Include personnel hiring, status
of funds spent, and any changes to original plans, goals, or objectives. What goals were
met? Include specific outcomes of the project or initiative.)
FY13 lease obligations from the Municipality of Anchorage and the CERC Eagle Center
were met.
Four new faculty were provided the new office space in support of an agreement with the
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School for the newly formed Alaska Middle College School.
3. What has been the impact? (How has UAA benefited from this initiative? Were
additional courses offered or students served? What research was completed, what
knowledge gained? What are the indicators that point to the impacts? How do the
results further the strategic objectives of UAA 2017? How has the initiative affected UA
Performance Measures?)
Allowed continued operational support of programs at CERC and Aviation, which
produced a total of 24,038 Student Credit Hours in AY13.
Provided support for the new Alaska Middle College School, which generated 739
Student Credit Hours.
4. What are the expected future outcomes of this initiative? (Where is this initiative
going next? How will this initiative continue to benefit UAA and its constituents? What is
the anticipated future impact on UA Performance Measures?)
This funding request will continue to contribute to teaching and learning by providing
instruction that meets relevant national accreditation standards.
5. Amount Spent. (As of April 2013)