CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s...

91
CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies, and prac7ces that impact incarcera7on and community supervision in Massachuse;s April 12, 2016 The Council of State Governments Jus(ce Center Steve Allen, Senior Policy Advisor, Behavioral Health Ka<e Mosehauer, Project Manager Monica Peters, Research Manager Cassondra Warney, Policy Analyst

Transcript of CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s...

Page 1: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

CSGJus(ceCenter—Massachuse2sCriminalJus(ceReview

WorkingGroupMee.ng2Keystatutoryframeworks,sentencingpolicies,andprac7cesthatimpact

incarcera7onandcommunitysupervisioninMassachuse;s

April12,2016

TheCouncilofStateGovernmentsJus(ceCenterSteveAllen,SeniorPolicyAdvisor,BehavioralHealthKa<eMosehauer,ProjectManager

MonicaPeters,ResearchManager

CassondraWarney,PolicyAnalyst

Page 2: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

TheCouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 2

Jus<ceCenterprovidesprac(cal,nonpar(sanadviceinformedbythe

bestavailableevidence.

National nonprofit, nonpartisan membership association of state government officials that engage members of all three branches of state government.

Page 3: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 3

Adata-drivenapproachtoreducecorrec.onsspendingandreinvestsavingsinstrategiesthatcandecreaserecidivismandincreasepublicsafetyTheJus<ceReinvestmentIni<a<veissupportedbyfundingfrom

theU.S.DepartmentofJus<ce’sBureauofJus(ceAssistance(BJA)andThePewCharitableTrusts

Page 4: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

SenatePresidentRosenberg“Throughcollabora7onbetweentheworking

groupandCSG,wewilliden7fypoliciesfor

Massachuse;stomakesmartreformsto

reducerecidivismrates,lowercosts,andinvest

inreentryprograms.”

Stateleadersaredemonstra<ngbipar<sansupportfor

MassachusePs’sjus<cereinvestmentapproach

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 4

HouseSpeakerDeLeo“Byusingadata-drivenanalysis,withthe

inputoftheappointees,wewillensurethat

ourpolicieshelpreducerecidivismand

incarcera7onrates,arecost-effec7ve,andare

structuredinawaythatbestservesthe

ci7zensofthecommonwealth.”

ChiefJus(ceGants"Iwelcometheopportunityto...pursueour

commongoalofenhancingpublicsafetyby

reducingtherateofrecidivismandtherateof

incarcera7on.”

GovernorBaker“Thisgroupofdis7nguishedindividualswithbackgrounds

incriminaljus7ceandlawenforcementwillservethe

commonwealthwellinourendeavorwiththeCouncilof

StateGovernmentstofurtherreformandimprovethe

judicialprocessandreducerecidivismandincarcera7on

rates.”

Massachuse2sCriminalJus(ceReview—WorkingGroupFirstMee<ng,January12,2016

Source:“StateLeadersRequestIndependentReviewofCriminalJus<ceSystem,”www.stanrosenberg.com/Independent-Review-Criminal-Jus<ce-System,and“StateLeadersAnnounceWorkingGroupforReviewofCriminalJus<ceSystem”www.mass.gov/governor/press-office/press-releases/fy2016/leaders-announce-criminal-jus<ce-system-working-group.html

Page 5: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Thefirstworkinggroupmee<ngiden<fiedathree-partscope

ofworkfortheproject

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 5

Incarcera(on

MassachusePs’s

incarceratedpopula<onsare

dividedinhalfbetween

countyandstatefacili<es

HOCpopula<onshavedriven

overalldeclinein

incarcera<on

Trendsinjailpopula<ons

differacrosscoun<es

Recidivism

Fewrecidivismmeasuresare

rou<nelycalculatedand

reportedinMA

Recidivismforprison

releaseshasremainedat

around40%

Useofriskandneeds

assessmentsare

fundamentaltoeffec<ve

recidivism-reduc<on

strategies

Supervision

Communitysupervision

servesapproximately3/4of

thecriminaljus<ce

popula<oninMA

Proba<onhasconsistently

beenrelieduponforpost-

releasesupervisionfrom

incarcera<on

Twooutoffiveprison

releasesarereleasedtono

supervision

Page 6: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Glossaryoftermsusedinthispresenta<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 6

Disposi(on—Post-arraignmentcourtappearancewiththeoutcomeofaguiltyornotguiltyfinding,or

Con<nuanceWithoutaFinding(CWOF)Convic(on—Atypeofdisposi<onresul<nginaguiltyfindingeitherthroughapleadeal,trial,orthe

revoca<onofaCWOFdisposi<onSentence—Theoutcomeofaconvic<on;op<onsincludeafine,proba<on,orsentencetoHouseof

Correc<on(HOC)orDepartmentofCorrec<on(stateprison)Proba(onSentence—Includesstraightandsuspendedproba<onsentences;doesnotincludeCWOFsSentencingEvent—Unitofsentencingdataanalysis,represen<ngtheeventatwhichacharge,orgroupof

charges,reachesconvic<on;theoutcomeofasentencingeventisdefinedusingthefollowinghierarchy:

lifesentence,stateprisonsentence,HOCsentence,HOC/splitsentence,proba<onsentence,andfineGoverningOffense—Thesinglechargeassociatedwithasentencingevent;iftherearemul<plecharges,

thegoverningoffenseiscategorizedbythemostseriouschargebasedonapriori<zedscaleDistrictCourt—Jurisdic<onovermisdemeanorandfelonycaseswithsentencingop<onstoHOCupto30

months,proba<on,fine,orotherpre-convic<ondisposi<ons;includesBostonMunicipalCourt

SuperiorCourt—Jurisdic<onovermisdemeanorandfelonycaseswithallsentencingop<onsavailable

Page 7: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Defini<onsofoffensecategoriesusedinthisanalysisaredrawnfromthe

SentencingCommission’sannualSurveyofSentencingPrac<ces

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 7

MotorVehicle•  Opera<ngwith

suspendedlicense

(OSL)

•  Opera<ngunderthe

influence(OUI)

•  OSLajerOUI

•  Leavingthescene

•  Insuranceviola<on

•  Reckless/negligent

driving

•  MVhomicide

Person•  Assault&BaPery

(A&B)

•  Robbery/armed

•  Homicide

•  Manslaughter

•  A&Bdeadlyweapon

•  In<mida<on

•  Kidnapping

•  Stalking

•  Threats

Property•  Larceny

•  Larcenyfromaperson

•  Shoplijing

•  ReceivingStolenGoods

•  Burglary/armed

•  Breaking&entering

•  Vandalism/destruc<on

ofproperty

•  Forgery/fraud

Drug•  Possession

•  Distribu<on(includes

possessionwith

intenttodistribute)

•  Drugparaphernalia

•  Forgedprescrip<on

•  Trafficking

•  Controlledsubstance

atschool

Weapons•  Firearmpossession

withoutapermit

•  Carryingdangerous

weapon

•  Bartley-Fox

mandatorysentence

Violentsexoffense•  Indecentassault&

baPery

•  Rape

•  Statutoryrape

•  Possessionchild

pornography

Other•  Disorderlyconduct

•  Trespassing

•  Resis<ngarrest

•  Escape

•  Pros<tu<on

•  Indecentexposure

•  Sexoffender

registra<onviola<on

•  APempttocommit

crime,accessory,or

conspiracy

•  Disturbingthepeace

•  Minorinpossession

ofalcohol

•  Procuringalcoholfor

aminor

•  Opencontainer

•  Truenameviola<on

•  Falsealarm

•  Crueltytoanimals

Source:MassachusePsOfficeoftheTrialCourts,Massachuse;sAnnualSurveyofSentencingPrac7ces

Page 8: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 8

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

KeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

Page 9: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

3,18510,713

34,444

26,399

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Between1980and2014,althoughviolentcrimefell26

percent,theDOCpopula<onspiked236percent

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 9

Sources:BureauofJus7ceSta7s7cs.CountofTotalJurisdic7onPopula7on.GeneratedusingtheCorrec7onsSta7s7calAnalysisToolatwww.bjs.gov.StateprisonJurisdic<onalpopula<onincludescriminaljurisdic<onalcases,includingpeopleawai<ngtrial.ThisdoesnotincludetheHOCpopula7on.

Theresidentpopula<onin

MassachusePsincreased14%

between1980and2010.

StatePrisonJurisdic<onalPopula<onandFBIUCRReportedViolentCrimes,1980–2014

DOCpop.

ViolentCrimes

+236%

-26%

Page 10: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

AlthoughMassachusePs’sincarcera<onrateisbelowthe

na<onalrate,ithasincreasedatafasterrate

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 10

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Sources:BureauofJus7ceSta7s7cs.ImprisonmentRateofSentencedPrisonersUndertheJurisdic7onofStateofFederalCorrec7onalAuthori7esper100,000residents,December31,1978-2014).GeneratedusingtheCorrec7onsSta7s7calAnalysisToolatwww.bjs.gov.

Incarcera<onRates,*1980–2014

*Incarcera<onratereportedbyBJSincludesfelonypopula<onssentencedtostateprisonorHOCswithasentencegreaterthan1year.

MA

US

+242

+219%

Percentchange

1980–2014

Page 11: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Eachyearthestatespendsoveronebilliondollarson

incarcera<oninstate-orcounty-operatedfacili<es

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 11

$583million

$1.1BILLION

DEPARTMENTOFCORRECTION

$553million

HOUSESOFCORRECTION/JAIL

Approximatelyhalfofthe

incarceratedpopula<onisserving

<meinstateprison,theotherhalf

inHOCandjails. TOTALSPENDINGONINCARCERATION

Source:MassachusePsExecu<veOfficeforAdministra<onandFinance,StateBudgetSummary,2015

Page 12: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Manyopportuni<esexisttoresolveacasebeforesentencing

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 12

CaseDismissedorNolle

ProsequiFiled

PRETRIALDIVERSIONS

Pretrial

Proba<on

Caseput

onfile

Dismissalon

Condi<ons

Successful

Comple<on

Source:MassachusePsExecu<veOfficeoftheTrialCourt,FY2014AnnualReport.

Termina<on

General

Con<nuance

DISPOSITION

NotGuilty

Guilty

SENTENCE

Houseof

Correc<on

StatePrison

Fines/Fees

Proba<on

Successful

Comple<on

Termina<on

Successful

Comple<on

Termina<on

Con<nueWithoutAFinding

(CWOF)

2013

DistrictCourt,BostonMunicipalCourt,andSuperiorCourtCaseFilings

Page 13: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

In2013,39,049criminaldocketsconcludedinconvic<onand

sentencing

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 13

23,559Fines/FeesandProba<on

60%

13,636HouseofCorrec<on

35%

1,854StatePrison

5%

Source:MassachusePsExecu<veOfficeoftheTrialCourt,FY2014AnnualReport.

In2013,therewere221,715totalcasefilingsintheDistrictCourt,Boston

MunicipalCourt,andSuperiorCourt.A

singlecase,orgroupofcases,maybe

associatedwithasingleconvic<on.

39,049Convic<ons

Page 14: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

TherearenearlyasmanyCWOFdisposi<onsascriminal

convic<onsinMassachusePs

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 14

31,855

88

35,684

3,365

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

2013Convic<onsand2014CWOFsbyCourt*

*2014istheonlyyearforwhichCWOFinforma<onisavailable.2013isthelatestyearofconvic<ondataavailabletotheCSGJus<ceCenter.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013and2014CARIsentencingdata.

DistrictCourt/BMC SuperiorCourt

RATIOOFCWOFsTOCONVICTIONS:

1TO38SUPERIORCOURT

1TO1.12

DISTRICTCOURT/BOSTONMUNICIPALCOURT

CWOFs

Convic<ons

AmajorityofCWOFsare

fromDistrictCourtorthe

BostonMunicipalCourt

Page 15: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

458

5,701

476

1,880

1,0691,267

855 407 302 227 226 253

10,070

3,949

5,174

99

2,383

78

3,580

287

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

SuperiorCourtsentencesareprimarilyforpersonsanddrugoffenseswhileDistrict

Court/BMCsentencesareprimarilyformotorvehicleandpropertyoffenses

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 15

MOTORVEHICLE

27%OFCONVICTIONS

2013Convic<onsforGoverningOffensebyOffenseTypeandLevel*

N=39,049

*91percentofconvic<onswerefromDistrictCourt/BMC,and9percentwerefromSuperiorCourt.Chargesatsentencingareincluded.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

PERSON

21%OFCONVICTIONS

PROPERTY

26%OFCONVICTIONS

DRUG

12%OFCONVICTIONS

OTHER

11%OFCONVICTIONS

WEAPON

2%OFCONVICTIONS

VIOLENTSEXOFFENSE

1%OFCONVICTIONS

Misdemeanor(DistrictCourt/BMC)

Felony(DistrictCourt/BMC)

Felony(SuperiorCourt)

Misdemeanor(SuperiorCourt)

Page 16: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

36%ofDistrictCourt/BMCsentencesand82%ofSuperiorCourt

sentencesaretoincarcera<on

16

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.Thisslideincludessentencesforconvic<onsinDistrictCourt,BostonMunicipalCourt,andSuperiorCourt.ThesefiguresdonotincludeCWOFs.

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

2013SentencestoStatePrison,HOC,Proba<on,andFinesbyOffenseType

N=39,049

Misdemeanor(DistrictCourt/BMC) Felony(DistrictCourt/BMC) Felony(SuperiorCourt)Misdemeanor(SuperiorCourt)

468

4,126

5,647

6,999

11,3587,086

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

Fine Proba<on HOC StatePrison

0

470

723

1,854

121

180

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

Fine Proba<on HOC StatePrison

36%

43%

21%

55%

27%

18%

<1%

Page 17: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

10%13% 13%

42%

21%

35%

22% 22%

18-24 25-34 35-44 45andolder

ResidentPopula<on

Convic<ons

Male

Female

Demographiccomposi<onoftheconvictedpopula<on

comparedtoresidentpopula<oninthestate

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 17

75%

6%10% 9%

66%

16% 15%

3%

White Black Hispanic Other

ResidentPopula<on

Convic<ons

83%17%

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;U.S.Census2010-2014AmericanCommunitySurvey5-YearEs<mates.

Male

Female52%

48%

PercentofResidentPopula<on/PercentofConvic<onsbyRace,2013

PercentofResidentPopula<on/PercentofConvic<onsbyAge,2013

PercentofResidentPopula<onbyGender,2013

PercentofConvic<onsbyGender,2013

Page 18: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Convic<ons,CWOFs,andsentencesbyrace

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 18

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Disposi<onsandSentencesforWhiteIndividuals Disposi<onsandSentencesforBlackIndividuals

Disposi<onsandSentencesforHispanicIndividuals Disposi<onsandSentencesforOtherIndividuals

Convic<ons CWOFs Fines Proba<on HOC DOC

25,874

23,133

Percentof25,874Convic<ons

19%

44%

34%

3%

Convic<ons CWOFs Fines Proba<on HOC DOC

Convic<ons CWOFs Fines Proba<on HOC DOC

6,416

3,850

Percentof6,416Convic<ons

16%

38% 39%

7%

5,717

3,639Percentof5,717Convic<ons

20%

33%38%

9%

Convic<ons CWOFs Fines Proba<on HOC DOC

1,042

1,321

Percentof1,042Convic<ons

27%

41%

27%

5%

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 19: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Anumberofstatutes,policies,andprac<cesshapethedistribu<onof

incarcera<onandcommunitysupervisionsentencesinMassachusePs

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 19

DATAANALYZEDTOEXPLORETHESETOPICS:

2013Sentencingdata(CARI)

2014CWOFdisposi<ondata(CARI)

2016JudicialsurveyconductedbyCSG

Criminalhistorydata(ICORI)

FACTORSSHAPINGINCARCERATIONANDSUPERVISION:

CWOFs

SentencingStatutes

SentencingGuidelines

DOC&HOCStructure

Post-ReleaseSupervisionStructure

Page 20: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Someanalysisisnotincludedinthispresenta<on*

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 20

ANALYSISNOTCOVEREDINTHISPRESENTATION

WHENANALYSISWILLBECOVERED

Pretrialprocesses(pretrialrelease,lengthofstay,bail,etc.)

May–June

DOC/HOCpopula<ons May–June

Paroledecisionmaking May–June

Recidivism/outcomes May–June

Post-releasesupervision June–July

Proba<on June–July

*DelaysinreceivingdatalimitedsomeoftheanalysisCSGJus<ceCentercouldcompleteforthisinterimreport

Page 21: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 21

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

KeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

Page 22: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

KEYFINDING:Peoplewithpreviousjus<cesysteminvolvementare

responsibleforthree-quartersofnewconvic<ons

22

16%

21%

26%

18%

19%

21%

38%

34%

33%

28%

26%

20%

HOC

StatePrison

AllSentences

0priors 1to2priors 3to10priors 11ormorepriors

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

NumberofPriorOffensesbySentenceType,2013

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

74%hadprior

convic<ons

Page 23: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Recidivismdrivesmostnewconvic<onac<vity

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 23

PercentofIndividualsConvictedin2013EverReceivingaCWOF*

N=32,839

34%(11,188people)

NOPRIORCWOF

25%(8,372people)

ONEPRIOR

CWOF

18%(5,832people)

TWOPRIOR

CWOFs

23%(7,447people)

THREEOR

MORE

PRIORCWOFs

66percentofindividualsconvictedin2013hadahistoryofatleastoneCWOF.11percentof

convic<onsweretheresultofarevoca<onofaCWOF.

*Individuals’latestdisposi<ondatein2013wasselected.Datanotavailablefor0.7%ofconvic<ons.Juvenilecriminalhistorywasexcludedfromtheanalysis.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIandiCORIdata.Criminalhistoriesarecalculatedusingthenumberofincidentsandincludesadultcriminalhistoryonly.

Peopleconvictedforpropertyoffenseshadthehighest

numberofpreviousconvic(ons

7.6

4.4

6.0

7.9

4.1

6.1

3.1

Other

Motorvehicle

Drug

Property

Weapons

Persons

Violentsexoffense

AverageNumberofPreviousConvic<onsbyOffenseType

Page 24: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

ArevolvingdoorexistswithHOCsentencesandstateprison

24CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

ofindividualssentencedtoDOCin2013hadaprior

HOCsentenceswithinthelastthreeyearsof

sentencingdata(sinceFY2010)

Sentencedto

HOC

Sentencedto

DOC

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

ofindividualssentencedtoHOCin2013hada

priorHOCsentencewithinthelastthreeyears

ofsentencingdata(sinceFY2010)43%

ofindividualssentencedtoDOCin2013hada

priorHOCsentencewithinthelastthreeyears

ofsentencingdata(sinceFY2010)31%

RELEASESFROMHOC

Page 25: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

179

1,199

259

891

3,111

465266

2,380

179

1,000

1,055

1,763

889

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Violentsex

offense

Persons Weapons Drug Property Motorvehicle Other

KEYFINDING:Motorvehicleandpropertyoffensesgeneratealarge

volumeofshortsentencestoHOC

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 25

2013SentencestoHOCbyOffenseTypeandLevel

N=13,636

Misdemeanor

Felony

47%ofallHOCsentences

6,394peoplereceived

asentencetoHOCfora

motorvehicleor

propertyoffensein

2013

Averagesentence

length:

Property7.3monthsMV4.4months

Alloffenseslistedinthischartare

the“governingoffense.”Individuals

mayhavehadaddi7onalchargeson

theircourtdocket,buttheoffense

shownherewasdeemedtobethe

mostseriousinthesentencingevent.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 26: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Morethan1,200peopleweresentencedtoHOC

forlarcenyoffenses,atacostofupto$13million

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 26

LESSTHAN$250MISDEMEANORLARCENY

Punishablebyafine/proba<onoruptoa

yearinanHOC

MORETHAN$250FELONYLARCENY

Punishablebyafine/proba<on,uptotwo

yearsinanHOC,orfiveyearsinstateprison

271

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000984

2013LarcenySentencestoHOC

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.MassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costper

inmate.Thecalcula<onrepresentsanaveragecostacrosscountyfacili<es.Someofthecostperinmateinforma<onincludesbothcountyjailandHOCcosts.

NumberofsentencestoHOCfor

felonylarceny:

984

Es<matedLOsbasedonmaximum

sentencelength:

105days

Costtoincarcerateaone-yearcohort

offelonylarcenyoffendersinHOC:

$11.5M

NumberofsentencestoHOCfor

misdemeanorlarceny:

271

Es<matedLOsbasedonmaximum

sentencelength:

55days

Costtoincarcerateaone-yearcohort

ofmisdemeanorlarcenyoffendersin

HOC:$1.7M

TotalPoten(alCost:$13.2M

Theabovefiguresarecostes7mates.Amore

thoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojecttoes7matecostsandpoten7al

savingsofspecificprac7cesandpolicies,andmay

differfromwhatisshownhere.

Thestatutorydefini(onoflarcenyonlystaircasestwolevelsofthel:

LESSTHAN$250andMORETHAN$250

Page 27: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

NearlyhalfofHOCsentencesformisdemeanormotorvehicle

offenseswereforOpera<ngwithaSuspendedLicense

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 27

MisdemeanorMotorVehicleSentencestoHOCs2013

N=1,763

819

286

215180

132

73 58

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Opera<ng

Suspended

License(OSL)

OUI Reckless

Negligence

Leavingthe

Scene

OSLajerOUI Insurance

Viola<on

Other*

47%ofmisdemeanormotor

vehiclesentencesto

incarcera<onarefor

drivingwithasuspended

license

MassachusePscould

bespendingasmuchas

$8millionayearincarcera<ng

misdemeanormotorvehicle

offenders

Theabovefigureisacostes7mate.A

morethoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojectto

es7matecostsandpoten7alsavingsof

specificprac7cesandpolicies,andmay

differfromwhatisshownhere.

Source:CSGCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdataaswellasMassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costperInmateinforma<on.Thecalcula<onrepresentsanaveragecostacrosscountyfacili<es.Someofthecostperinmateinforma<onincludesbothcountyjailandHOCcosts.*OtherincludesHabitualTrafficOffenderandMVHomicide.

AverageSentenceLength

1.5MONTHS

2.6MONTHS

4.3MONTHS

5.1MONTHS

3.6MONTHS

0.8MONTHS

3.5MONTHS

IndividualsinMassachuse2smayhavetheirdriver’slicense

suspendedorrevokedforanumberofreasons:

Opera<ngundertheinfluence

Recklessdriving

Convic<onofcertaindrugoffenses

Delinquencyinpayingchildsupport

Existenceofanoutstandingwarrant

Viola<onofseriousvehiclelaw

Habitualoffenderconvic<on

9.3PRIORS

3.5PRIORS

6.1PRIORS

7.3PRIORS

7.5PRIORS

5.6PRIORS

7.8PRIORS

AverageNumberofPriorConv

Page 28: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

MisdemeanorsentencestoHOCcostthestateanes<mated

$48millionayear

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 28

*Theabovefigureisacostes7mate.Amorethoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojecttoes7matecostsandpoten7alsavingsofspecificprac7cesandpolicies,andmaydifferfromwhatisshownhere.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;MassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costperinmate.Thecalcula<onrepresentsanaveragecostacross

countyfacili<es.Someofthecostperinmateinforma<onincludesbothcountyjailandHOCcosts.

ESTIMATEDCOSTOFINCARCERATING

MISDEMEANOROFFENSES

$48million*

MISDEMEANORSENTENCESTOHOC

7,266 AVERAGESENTENCELENGTH

AVERAGECOSTPERDAYINHOC

AVERAGELENGTHOFSTAYESTIMATE

4.3months

2months

$112

7,266x60

daysx$112

Page 29: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

KEYFINDING:Sentencingprac<cesimpactwhetherpeople

sentencedtoincarcera<onreceivepost-releasesupervision

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 29

Sentencingpolicyandprac(cethatsetslimita(onsonPAROLE

Sentencingpolicyandprac(cethatallowopportuni(esforPROBATION

MIN/MAXRATIO

Ø  Reducingtherangebetweentheminandmax

resultsinashorterwindowofparoleeligibility.

Ø  “Andaday”sentencesareacommonprac<ceof

sexngthemaxwithinonedayofthemin.

MANDATORYMINIMUMS

Ø  Restric<onsonpar<cipa<oninpre-release

programspriortominimumterm.

HOCPAROLE

Ø  HOCsentencesshorterthan60daysarenot

paroleeligible.

FROM&AFTERPROBATIONØ  Asentencetoproba<onfollowingasentenceto

incarcera<on.

Ø  Musthavemul<plechargesatsentencing.

Ø  AllowableforbothHOCandDOCsentences.

SPLITSENTENCES

Ø  Asuspendedsentenceofproba<onfollowinga

sentencetoHOC.

Ø  Applicableonasinglecharge.

Ø  AllowableforHOC,butnotforDOCsentences.

Opportuni<esforproba<onreferstopost-releasesupervisiononly.Source:CSGJus<ceCenterreviewofMassachusePsGeneralLaws.

Page 30: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

620

387

233

355

245

110

536

447

89

343

172

171

Nearly20%ofstateprisonsentencesrestrictparoleandhave

noguaranteedpost-releaseproba<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 30

NoAndaDayorFrom&Ajer

From&Ajer+AndaDay

From&Ajer

AndaDay

Mandatory

Sentences

N=603

Non-Mandatory

Sentences

N=1,251

TotalStatePrison

Sentences

N=1,854

39% 18% 15% 28%

31% 20% 36% 14%

33% 19% 29% 19%

698total“andaday”sentences

2013StatePrisonSentences

AndaDayAsentencewiththeminimumand

maximumsentenceonedayapart

From&Aler

Asentenceofpost-releaseproba<on

From&Aler+AndaDay

Asentenceofpost-releaseproba<on

aswellasminandmaxonedayapart

NoAndaDayorFrom&AlerNosentenceofpost-release

proba<onandtheperiodbetween

minandmaxlongerthanoneday42%haveasentencerangeofoneyearorless

20to50percentofstateprisonsentenceswillbereviewedbytheparoleboardtodetermine

eligibilityandreleasetopost-releasesupervision.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 31: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Thelikelihoodofreceivingapost-releaseproba<onsentence

decreasedascriminalhistoryscoreincreased

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 31

51%48% 49%

42%40%

34%

30%

24%

No/MinorRecord ModerateRecord SeriousRecord ViolentorRepe<<veRecord

StatePrison HOC

CriminalHistory

PercentofSentencestoIncarcera<onwithPost-ReleaseProba<onbyCriminalHistoryScore,2013

Howaredecisionsaboutpost-releasesupervisionmade?

Aretheindividuals

mostlikelytobenefitfrompost-

releasesupervisiontheonesreceivingit?

31% 39% 32% 37%Stateprisonsentenceswithan

“andaday”sentenceoutofthose

withnopost-releaseproba<on.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 32: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Peoplewithmorethanthreeprioroffensesweremorelikelyto

receivestraightHOCsentenceswithnopost-releaseproba<on*

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 32

13%

20%

24%

17%

21%

25%

38%

38%

32%

32%

21%

19%

StraightHOC

HOCSplit

HOCFrom&Ajer

0priors 1to2priors 3to10priors 11ormorepriors

NumberofPriorOffensesfor2013SentencesbySentenceType

*StraightHOCsentencesover60daysareparoleeligibleiftheindividualdoesnotwaivetheirparolehearingSource:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

N=1,033

N=3,507

N=9,096

Post-releaseProba(on

70%ofstraight

HOCsentences

have3ormore

prioroffenses

60%ofstraightHOCsentenceswillbeeligibleforparoleduetosentencelengthandthereforemay

bereviewedbytheparoleboardtodeterminereleasetopost-releasesupervision.

Page 33: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

SUMMARY:Peoplewithpreviousjus<cesysteminvolvement

areresponsibleforthree-quartersofnewconvic<ons

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 33

Recidivismdrivesmostnewconvic<onac<vity:74percentofpeoplesentencedhadapriorconvic<onand66percenthadahistoryofatleastoneCon<nuanceWithoutaFinding(CWOF).

Morethan40percentofpeoplesentencedtoanHOChadapriorHOCsentencewithinthepreviousthreeyears.

Peopleconvictedofpropertyoffenseshadthehighestnumberofprior

offenses.

Page 34: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

SUMMARY:Motorvehicleandpropertyoffensesaccountfor

alargevolumeofshortsentencestoHOC

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 34

NearlyhalfofallsentencestoHOC(6,394convic<ons)wereformotor

vehicleandpropertyoffenses.

54percentofmotorvehicleandpropertyHOCconvic<ons(3,464

convic<ons)werefor6monthsorless.Peoplereceivedanaveragesentenceof7.3monthsforpropertyand4.4monthsformotorvehicle

offenses.

39percentofallmisdemeanorsentencestoHOCwereformotorvehicle

andpropertyoffenses,including271convic<onsforLarcenyunder$250.819motorvehiclesentencestoHOCwereforOpera(ngwithaSuspendedLicense.

Thestatespentupto$15million*onincarcera<onformisdemeanor

motorvehicleandpropertyoffenses.

*Theabovefigureisacostes7mate.Amorethoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojecttoes7matecostsandpoten7alsavingsofspecificprac7cesandpolicies,andmaydifferfromwhatisshownhere.

Page 35: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

SUMMARY:Sentencingprac<cesimpactwhetherpeople

sentencedtoincarcera<onreceivepost-releasesupervision

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 35

Nearlyhalfofsentencestostateprisonincludedasentenceofpost-releaseproba<on.

19percentofstateprisonsentencespreventanypost-releasesupervision,solelybasedonthesentence;drugsentencesweremost

likelytorestrictpost-releasesupervision.

Thelikelihoodofreceivingapost-releaseproba<onsentencedecreased

ascriminalhistoryscoreincreased.

Two-thirdsofHOCsentenceswerestraightsentencesthatdidnotincludepost-releaseproba<on,and40percentofpeoplewhoreceivedstraightsentenceswillnotbeeligibleforparoleduetosentencelength.

Page 36: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Keypolicyconsidera<ons

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 36

Recidivismaccountsforthreeoutofeveryfournewsentences.Whatstepscanbetakentoreduceratesofrecidivismacrosstheboard,

par<cularlyforpeoplereleasedfromHOC?

Massachuse2sspendstensofmillionsofdollarsincarcera(ngpeopleconvictedofmisdemeanoroffensessuchasmotorvehicleandpropertycrimes.Aretherelesscostlyapproachestoholdingthesepeopleaccountablefor

theiroffensesthatcouldalsoproducebePerpublicsafetyoutcomes?

Sentencingpoliciesandprac(cesresultininconsistentuseofpost-releasesupervisionandaccesstocommunitysupports.AretherewaystobePertargetresourcestopeoplewhoaremostlikelyto

reoffendandreduceinvestmentsinpeoplewhopresentalowrisk?

v 

v 

v 

Page 37: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 37

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

CWOFs

KEYSENTENCINGSTATUTES

SENTENCINGGUIDELINES

DOC&HOCSTRUCTURE

POST-RELEASESUPERVISION

DetailedDiscussionofKeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

Thislistispresentedinorderofanindividual’s

progressionthroughthecriminaljus7cesystem

anddoesnotreflectorderofpriorityorimpact.

Page 38: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Con<nuanceWithoutaFinding(CWOF)isabroadlydefined

andapplieddisposi<oninMassachusePscourts

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 38

Ø  ACWOFisadisposi<oninwhich

allpar<esagreethatthereis

sufficientevidencetosupporta

guiltyfinding.

Ø  Ratherthandisposingofthecaseasaconvic<on,thecourt

“con<nueswithoutafinding”fora

designatedperiodof<me.

Ø  Duringthis<me,thedefendantis

placedonproba<on.Ifthe

individualsa<sfiesthetermsofhis

orherCWOF,thecasewillbe

dismissedbythecourtwithouta

convic<on.

Ø  Shouldtheindividualfailtomeet

thetermsoftheCWOF,thecourt

willdisposethecaseasaconvic<on

andproceedtosentencing.

GUILTY NOTGUILTY

SENTENCING

PROBATION FINE INCARCERATION

SUCCESSFULCOMPLETION

PROBATIONSURRENDERED

WRAP-UP PROBATION

SUCCESSFULCOMPLETION REVOCATION

PRETRIALHEARING

COMPLIANCEANDELECTIONOFTRIALDATE

DISPOSITION

ARRAIGNMENT

PAROLE

CWOF

Source:MassachusePsGeneralLawsChapter278,Sec<on18

Page 39: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Therearefewrestric<onsonoffensesthatcanqualifyforaCWOF

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 39

Chapter278,Sec(on18impartsbroadauthoritytothecourttouseCWOFs:

UseofCWOFsisnotlimitedtofirst-<meoffenders

CWOFscanbeusedforbothmisdemeanorandfelonyoffenses

solongasstatutedoesnotprohibituseofCWOForproba<on

CWOFscanbeusedconcurrentlywithaconvic<onforother

charges

IndividualsmayreceivemorethanoneCWOF

CWOFsmaybeusedinbothDistrictCourtandtheBoston

MunicipalCourt.Commonwealthv.Powell(2009)allowsfor

theuseofCWOFsinSuperiorCourt,thoughCWOFdisposi<ons

remainrare.

ü ü ü ü ü 

Source:MassachusePsGeneralLawsChapter278,Sec<on18:

Page 40: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

TherearenearlyasmanyCWOFdisposi<onsascriminal

convic<onsinMassachusePs

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 40

31,855

88

35,684

3,365

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

2013Convic<onsand2014CWOFsbyCourt*

*2014istheonlyyearforwhichasnapshotofCWOFinforma<onisavailable.2013isthelatestyearofconvic<ondataavailabletotheCSGJus<ceCenter.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013and2014CARIsentencingdata.

DistrictCourt/BMC SuperiorCourt

RATIOOFCWOFsTOCONVICTIONS:

1TO38SUPERIORCOURT

1TO1.12

DISTRICTCOURT/BOSTONMUNICIPALCOURT

CWOFs

Convic<ons

AmajorityofCWOFsare

fromDistrictCourtorthe

BostonMunicipalCourt

Page 41: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

CWOFsareusedinalloffensecategories,thoughthe

propor<onofCWOFstoconvic<onsvaries

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 41

MotorVehicle Property Persons Drug Other Weapons Violentsexoffense

95%

61%

39%

5%

10,623

13,528

10,151

6,047

8,222

5,760

4,5834,166 4,122

1,860

869451 479

131

2013Convic<onsand2014CWOFsbyOffense*

64%

36%

54%

46%

87%

13% 61%39%

100%

MisdemeanorConvic<on

FelonyConvic<on

MisdemeanorCWOF

FelonyCWOF

99%

1%

34%

66%

77%

23%

78%

22%

88%

12%45%55% 100%

n=39,049

n=31,943

ThenumberofCWOFs

andconvic<ons

representindividual

disposi<ons,butnot

individualpeople.One

personmayhaveboth

anac<veCWOFanda

convic<on.

*2014istheonlyyearforwhichCWOFinforma<onisavailable.2013isthelatestyearofconvic<ondataavailabletotheCSGJus<ceCenter.Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013and2014CARIsentencingdata.

99%ofCWOFsarein

DistrictCourt/BMC

Lessthan1%ofCWOFsareinSuperiorCourt

Page 42: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

1,744

1,074

4,139

173

5,517

731

4,174

909

4,842

70

2,166

2,828

4,457

6,224

1,333

1,618

3,282

142

4,528

532

3,251

911

4,024

125

2,157

2,8533,054

4,133

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Convic<ons CWOFs

Thenumbersofconvic<onsandCWOFsvaryacrosscoun<es

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 42

2013Convic<onsand2014CWOFsbyCounty*

*2014istheonlyyearforwhichasnapshotofCWOFinforma<onisavailable.TheCSGJus<ceCenterhasnotyetreceived2014sentencingdata.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013and2014CARIsentencingdata.

Thereareavarietyofreasonsfordifferencesinthenumbersandpropor7onsofCWOFsandconvic7ons,

includingvariancesinlocalcrimeratesandseriousnessofoffenses.

Page 43: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Male

Female

Demographiccomposi<onofCWOFscomparedto

residentpopula<oninthestate

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 43

71%29%

10%13% 13%

42%

21%

35%

22% 22%

18-24 25-34 35-44 45andolder

ResidentPopula<on

CWOFs

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2014CARIcourtdata;U.S.Census2010–2014AmericanCommunitySurvey5-YearEs<mates.

.

Male

Female

52%

48%

PercentofResidentPopula<on/PercentofCWOFsbyRace,2013

PercentofResidentPopula<on/PercentofCWOFsbyAge,2013

PercentofResidentPopula<onbyGender,2013

PercentofCWOFsbyGender,201375%

6%10% 9%

72%

12% 11%

4%

White Black Hispanic Other

ResidentPopula<on

CWOFs

Page 44: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Two-thirdsofpeopleconvictedin2013hadahistoryofat

leastonepriorCWOFasanadult

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 44

PercentofPeopleConvictedin2013EverReceivingaCWOF*

N=32,839

34%(11,188people)

NOPRIORCWOF

25%(8,372people)

ONEPRIOR

CWOF

18%(5,832people)

TWOPRIOR

CWOFs

23%(7,447people)

THREEORMORE

PRIORCWOFs

66percentofpeopleconvictedin2013hadahistory

ofatleastoneCWOF.

In201311percentofconvic<onsweretheresultofa

revoca<onofaCWOF.

*Individuals’latestdisposi<ondatein2013wasselected.Datanotavailablefor0.7%ofconvic<ons.Juvenilecriminalhistorywasexcludedfromtheanalysis.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIandCORIdata.

Page 45: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

NearlyhalfofCWOFshaveaperiodofsupervisedproba<on

of10to12months

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 45

12%

25%

11%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

13monthsormore

10to12months

4to9months

3monthsorless

PeoplewithCWOFshave

ashortertermof

supervisedproba<on

thanconvicted

individualssentencedto

straightproba<on.

Theaverage

proba<onsentenceis

17–20months.

2014CWOFDisposi<onsbyLengthofProba<on*

N=31,943

*3%ofcasesdidnothavelengthofsupervisionavailable

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2014CARIsentencingdataandproba<oncaseloaddata;MAOfficeoftheCommissionerofProba<on.

49%

Page 46: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Judgesiden<fiedseverityofoffenseandcriminalhistoryas

keyconsidera<onsindecisionstouseaCWOFoverconvic<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 46

Judgesiden(fiedaddi(onalfactorsasbeinginfluen(alin

theirdecisionmaking:

Inputandconsensus

amongvic<msinthecase

Likelihoodofadefendant

toreoffend

Thecourtinwhichthey

arepresiding:CWOFsare

rareinSuperiorCourt

PercentofJudgesRepor<ngFactorsasVeryImportanttoMakingDecisionsonCWOFs

*CSGJus<ceCenterelectronicsurveyofMassachusePsjudges,March2016.14BostonMunicipalCourtjudges,31DistrictCourtjudgesand30SuperiorCourtjudgespar<cipatedinthesurvey.

86%

93%

79% 79%

71%

50%

21%

87%90%

77% 77%

45%

39%

32%

93%

83%87%

73%

40%

33%

23%

Severityofcrime Criminalhistory Typeofoffense

(person,drug,

property,etc.)

First<me

offenderstatus

Ageofoffender Abilitytoprevent

collateral

consequences

Pleaagreement

offeredbyDA

anddefense

BostonMunicipalCourt DistrictCourt SuperiorCourt

Page 47: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

CWOFsarebroadlyused,butliPleisknownabouttheirimpacton

thecriminaljus<cesystemorpeoplewhoreceivethem

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 47

Thereissignificantflexibilityintheuseof

CWOFs.DistrictCourtandBMCmostheavily

relyonthisdisposi<onop<on.

CWOFsareusedasastrongincen<veto

successfullycompleteproba<on.

CWOFspreventcollateralconsequencesfor

manyrecipientsbypreven<ngapermanent

criminalrecord(thoughthefederal

governmentviewsCWOFsasaconvic<onin

professionallicensingandimmigra<on

circumstances).

ItislikelythatpeoplewhoreceiveCWOFswill

havemul<pleinterac<onswiththecriminal

jus<cesystem.

Whatarethekeydifferencesbetweenpeople

whoreceiveaCWOFandthosethatare

convictedandreceiveasentencetostraight

proba<on?

Dorecidivismoutcomesdifferforpeoplewith

CWOFsversuspeoplewithstraightproba<on

sentences?

Howdotheratesofsuccessfulcomple<onof

proba<ondifferforpeoplewithCWOFsversus

peoplewithstraightproba<onsentences?

WhatdoCWOFscostthecriminaljus<ce

system?Howdoesthatcomparetoother

disposi<ons/sentences?

KEYSYSTEMFACTSABOUTCWOFs UNKNOWNSFORCWOFDISPOSITIONS

Page 48: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Addi<onalanalysisonCWOFs

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 48

HowmanyCWOFsarethereeachyear?

Whatkindofoffenses/offendersreceiveCWOFs?

HowojendopeoplewhoreceiveCWOFsrecidivate?Istheir

recidivismratebePerorworsethanpeoplewhoproceedto

convic<onsandreceiveeitherproba<onorincarcera<on

sentences?

WhatdoCWOFscostorsavethesystem?

HowdoCWOFsimpactpublicsafety?

IfCWOFsascurrentlyusedlackeffec<veness,howcouldthey

bepoten<allyrestructuredtobePerfitintoaneffec<ve

con<nuumofresponses?

ü ü 

Page 49: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 49

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

CWOFs

KEYSENTENCINGSTATUTES

SENTENCINGGUIDELINES

DOC&HOCSTRUCTURE

POST-RELEASESUPERVISION

DetailedDiscussionofKeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

Thislistispresentedinorderofanindividual’s

progressionthroughthecriminaljus7cesystem

anddoesnotreflectorderofpriorityorimpact.

Page 50: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

Motorvehicle Property Persons Drug Other Weapons Violentsex

offense

2,122

517 529 479

Overhalfofconvic<onswereforpropertyormotorvehicleoffenses

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 50

2013Convic<onsbyOffenseTypeandLevel

N=39,049

10,097

3,974

5,273

2,4613,605

340

6,177

526

2,949

Misdemeanor Felony

53%ofallconvic(ons 6,643

individualsreceived

asentenceto

incarcera<onfora

motorvehicleor

propertyoffensein

2013

Alloffenseslistedinthischartare

the“governingoffense.”Peoplemay

havehadaddi7onalchargesontheir

courtdocket,buttheoffenseshown

herewasdeemedtobethemost

seriousinthesentencingevent.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 51: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Thestatespentupto$15milliononincarcera<onfor

misdemeanormotorvehicleandpropertyoffenses

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 51

Therearedozensofcriminalmotorvehicle

offensesinMassachusePs,amajorityof

whichcanbesentencedtoincarcera<on.

PropertyCrimeStatutes

CriminalMotorVehicleStatutes

Larcenystatuteshavemanycategories,but

liPledefini<onaroundseverity.Mostlarceny

convic<onscanbesentencedtoincarcera<on.

Source:GeneralLawsChapter266,Sec<ons30-60.DistrictCourtDepartmentoftheTrialCourt&RegistryofMotorVehicles.TableofCitableMotorVehicleOffenseseffec7veOctober23,2013basedonGeneralLawsChapter90,Sec<ons1-4.CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;MassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costperInmate.

1,055

1,432 1,487

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

HOC Proba<on Other

1,763

5,332

3,002

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

HOC Proba<on Other

MisdemeanorPropertyCrimebySentence MisdemeanorMotorVehicleCrimebySentence

N=10,097N=3,974

Page 52: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

NearlyhalfofHOCsentencesformisdemeanormotorvehicle

offenseswereforOpera<ngwithaSuspendedLicense

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 52

MisdemeanorMotorVehicleSentencestoHOCs2013

N=1,763

819

286

215180

132

73 58

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Opera<ng

Suspended

License(OSL)

OUI Reckless

Negligence

Leavingthe

Scene

OSLajerOUI Insurance

Viola<on

Other*

47%ofmisdemeanormotor

vehiclesentencesto

incarcera<onarefor

drivingwithasuspended

license

MassachusePscould

bespendingasmuchas

$8millionayearincarcera<ng

misdemeanormotorvehicle

offenders

Theabovefigureisacostes7mate.A

morethoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojectto

es7matecostsandpoten7alsavingsof

specificprac7cesandpolicies,andmay

differfromwhatisshownhere.

Source:CSGCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdataaswellasMassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costperInmateinforma<on.Thecalcula<onrepresentsanaveragecostacrosscountyfacili<es.Someofthecostperinmateinforma<onincludesbothcountyjailandHOCcosts.*OtherincludesHabitualTrafficOffenderandMVHomicide.

AverageSentenceLength

1.5MONTHS

2.6MONTHS

4.3MONTHS

5.1MONTHS

3.6MONTHS

0.8MONTHS

3.5MONTHS

PeopleinMassachuse2smayhavetheirdriver’slicensesuspendedor

revokedforanumberofreasons:

Opera<ngundertheinfluence

Recklessdriving

Convic<onofcertaindrugoffenses

Delinquencyinpayingchildsupport

Existenceofanoutstandingwarrant

Viola<onofseriousvehiclelaw

Habitualoffenderconvic<on

9.3PRIORS

3.5PRIORS

6.1PRIORS

7.3PRIORS

7.5PRIORS

5.6PRIORS

7.8PRIORS

AverageNumberofPriorConv

Page 53: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Morethan1,200peopleweresentencedtoHOC

forlarcenyoffenses,atacostofupto$13million

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 53

LESSTHAN$250MISDEMEANORLARCENY

Punishablebyafine/proba<onoruptoa

yearinanHOC

MORETHAN$250FELONYLARCENY

Punishablebyafine/proba<on,uptotwo

yearsinanHOC,orfiveyearsinstateprison

271

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000984

2013LarcenySentencestoHOC

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.MassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costper

inmate.Thecalcula<onrepresentsanaveragecostacrosscountyfacili<es.Someofthecostperinmateinforma<onincludesbothcountyjailandHOCcosts.

NumberofsentencestoHOCfor

felonylarceny:

984

Es<matedLOsbasedonmaximum

sentencelength:

105days

Costtoincarcerateaone-yearcohort

offelonylarcenyoffendersinHOC:

$11.5M

NumberofsentencestoHOCfor

misdemeanorlarceny:

271

Es<matedLOsbasedonmaximum

sentencelength:

55days

Costtoincarcerateaone-yearcohort

ofmisdemeanorlarcenyoffendersin

HOC:$1.7M

TotalPoten(alCost:$13.2M

Theabovefiguresarecostes7mates.Amore

thoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojecttoes7matecostsandpoten7al

savingsofspecificprac7cesandpolicies,andmay

differfromwhatisshownhere.

Thestatutorydefini(onoflarcenyonlystaircasestwolevelsofthel:

LESSTHAN$250andMORETHAN$250

Page 54: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Thefelonylarcenythresholdhasnotbeenadjustedtokeep

upwithinfla<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 54

Changesinfelonylarceny*thresholdshavenotresultedinhigherpropertycrimeorthejrates.Otherstatesrefertolarcenyasthej.Source:MassachusePsGeneralLawsChapter266,Sec<on30.CSGJus<ceCenterlegalanalysisofstates’felonylarcenythresholds.

FelonyThej/Larceny$500orLess FelonyThej/Larceny$650orMore

FelonyThej/Larceny*ThresholdsbyState2015

Massachuse2sisoneof14stateswithafelonylarcenythreshold

of$500orless

ValueofMassachusePs’sHistoricalFelonyLarcenyThresholdin

2014Dollars,1977–2014

$977

$250

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

$977IN2014DOLLARSISEQUIVALENTTO$250IN1977DOLLARS

Page 55: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

66%

16% 15%

3%

72%

16%11%

2%

72%

11%14%

4%

White Black Hispanic Other

Convic<ons Property MotorVehicle

21%

35%

22% 22%23%

36%

23%

19%

15%

34%

23%

28%

18-24 25-34 35-44 45andolder

Convic<ons Property MotorVehicle

2013Property,MotorVehicle,andTotalConvic<onsbyAge

Demographiccomposi<onofmotorvehicleandproperty

convic<onscomparedtototalconvic<ons

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 55

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;U.S.Census2010-2014AmericanCommunitySurvey5-YearEs<mates.

2013Property,MotorVehicle,andTotalConvic<onsbyRace

Male

Female

83% 17%

2013Convic<onsbyGender

Male

Female

75%25%

2013PropertyConvic<onsbyGender

Male

Female

84% 16%

2013MotorVehicleConvic<onsbyGender

Page 56: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Addi<onalanalysisonkeysentencingstatutes

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 56

Whatarethemostcommonlyusedcriminalstatutes?

HowdoMassachusePs’spropertyoffensethresholds

comparena<onally?

Whatarethecostsforincarcera<ngpeopleconvictedof

low-levelpropertyoffenses?

Whatarethestatutoryrequirementsforimposing

res<tu<onaspartofsentencingandhowdothese

comparetootherstates?

Whatopportuni<esexistpretrial?

Whatistheimpactofmandatorysentences?

Whatistherela<onshipbetweenpropertyoffensesand

substanceusedisorders?

ü ü ü 

Page 57: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 57

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

CWOFs

KEYSENTENCINGSTATUTES

SENTENCINGGUIDELINES

DOC&HOCSTRUCTURE

POST-RELEASESUPERVISION

DetailedDiscussionofKeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

Thislistispresentedinorderofanindividual’s

progressionthroughthecriminaljus7cesystem

anddoesnotreflectorderofpriorityorimpact.

Page 58: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

MassachusePsisoneof21stateswithsomeformof

sentencingguidelines

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 58

Source:IncludesWashingtonDC,whichisnotmarkedonthemap.hPp://www.ncsc.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/CSI/State_Sentencing_Guidelines.ashx

In1991theMassachusePsTaskForceonJus<cefoundthat“sentencinginMassachuse;sis

haphazard,confusing,andarchaic,withahodgepodgeofop7ons.Asaresult,thereisa

substan7aldispropor7onalityinsentencesgivenforvariousoffensesandalackofuniformity

amongsentencesimposedforthesameoffense.”

DevelopmentofthesentencingguidelinesinMAreflectedseveralkeyconsidera(ons

Ø  Ensuringadequatediscre(onwhileprovidingadequateguidance

Ø  Promo(ngfairnessandreducingdisparity

StateswithSentencingGuidelines

Page 59: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Theguidelinesincludeagridthatsortscasesintozonesbased

onoffenseseverityandcriminalhistory

59CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

Incarcera(onZonePresump7vesentence

ofincarcera7on

(stateprisonorHOC)

Discre(onaryZonePresump7vesentence

ofincarcera7on(state

prisonorHOC)or

intermediatesanc7ons

(proba7on/fine)

INTERMEDIATESANCTIONSZONEPresump7vesentenceof

intermediatesanc7ons

(proba7on/fine)

CriminalHistory

SENTENCINGGUIDELINESGRID

12%ofsentencesin2013werenotassigned

tothesentencinggrid(OUI,Mandatoryfirearms,

Non-jailableoffenses)

A-No/MinorRecordB-ModerateRecordC-SeriousRecordD-ViolentorRepe((veRecordE-SeriousViolentRecord

SeverityLevels1and2arealmost

primarilymisdemeanors—drug,

publicorder,motorvehicle,

property

SeverityLevels3and4aremixture

offelony/misdemeanorandmostly

drug/propertybutalsosomelow-

levelassault

SeverityLevels5andhigheraremostlyviolentfeloniesorhigh-level

drugtrafficking

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;MassachusePsSentencingCommission,1998SentencingGuide:Massachuse;sSentencingGuidelines.

Page 60: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

ThegridisaconsistenttoolusedbySuperiorCourtjudges,

buttheguidelinesarenotapplicabletoDistrictCourtcases

60CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

Strongestfactorsindecidingonincarcera(onandincarcera(on

lengthinclude:

“Rarely”or“Never”

98%DistrictCourt/BMCJudges

71% ofjudgesreportedtheyreceivesufficient

informa<ontofeelconfidentinmaking

sentencingdecisions

91% rarelyorneverorderapre-sentence

inves<ga<on

Offensetypeandseverity

Criminalhistory

Statutoryrequirement

Professionaljudgment

CONSULTINGTHESENTENCINGGUIDELINESINSENTENCINGDECISIONS

*DistrictCourtresponsesincludeBostonMunicipaljudges.CSGJus<ceCenterelectronicsurveyofMassachusePsjudges,March2016.45BostonMunicipalandDistrictCourtjudgesand30superiorcourtjudgespar<cipatedinthesurvey.

“Always”or“Ojen”

93%SuperiorCourtJudges

Page 61: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

3,837

5,924

10,255

5,527

207

0

0

0

0

0

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,00012,000

Nogrid

Level1

Level2

Level3

Level4

Level5

Level6

Level7

Level8

Level9

999

9

767

6,658

2,811

1,067

575

218

118

77

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,00012,000

Nogrid

Level1

Level2

Level3

Level4

Level5

Level6

Level7

Level8

Level9

Amajorityofoffenses,especiallythoseprocessedinDistrictCourt,

fallintooffenselevels1through4andareinthediscre<onaryzone

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 61

“Nogrid”includesOUI,mandatorygun,andnon-jailableoffenses.Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;MassachusePsSentencingCommission,1998SentencingGuide:Massachuse;sSentencingGuidelines.

MISDEMEANORSN=25,750

FELONIESN=13,299

No/MinorRecord(A)

ModerateRecord(B)

SeriousRecord(C)

ViolentorRepe((ve(D)

SeriousViolent(E)

9 Mandatory

Life

Mandatory

Life

Mandatory

Life

Mandatory

Life

Mandatory

Life

8 StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison

7 StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison

6 StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison StatePrison

5 Prison/HOC

Proba<on

Prison/HOC

Proba<onStatePrison StatePrison StatePrison

4 Prison/HOC

Proba<on

Prison/HOC

Proba<on

Prison/HOC

Proba<on

StatePrison

HOC

StatePrison

HOC

3HOC

Proba<on

Fine

Prison/HOC

Proba<on

Fine

Prison/HOC

Proba<on

Fine

Prison/HOC

Proba<on

Prison/HOC

Proba<on

2 Proba<on

Fine

HOC

Proba<on

Fine

HOC

Proba<on

Fine

HOC

Proba<on

Fine

HOC

Proba<on

Fine

1 Proba<on

Fine

Proba<on

Fine

Proba<on

Fine

HOC

Proba<on

Fine

HOC

Proba<on

Fine

Notassigned OUI,mandatorygun,andnon-jailableoffenses

Offense

Severity

Criminal

History

Ofsentencesthatareassignedtothegrid,86%aresentencedwithintheproposedguidelinesranges,

58%wereinthe“discre<onaryzone”

Page 62: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Sentencingoutcomescanvaryforindividualswiththesame

offenseandsimilarcriminalhistory

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 62

EXAMPLEOFFENSE1:

LarcenyLessThan$250CriminalHistory:Minor—Moderate

OffenseSeverityLevel:2

EXAMPLEOFFENSE3:

DrugPossessionClassBCriminalHistory:Minor—Moderate

OffenseSeverityLevel:2

30%

HOC

57%

Proba<on

13%

Fine

39%

HOC

47%

Proba<on

14%

Fine

N=522

N=522

Theoffensesincludedinthisanalysisrepresent

thechargeatsentencingandmay,insome

cases,bedifferentfromtheoriginalcharge.

CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

N=278

EXAMPLEOFFENSE2:

Opera(ngLicenseSuspended(Subsequent)CriminalHistory:Minor—Moderate

OffenseSeverityLevel:2

48%

HOC

40%

Proba<on

12%

Fine

2013Sentences

Page 63: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

11.2

15.614.0

22.6 22.9

25.5

SuperiorCourtsentencesareconsistentlylongerthanDistrict

Courtsentencesforsimilaroffenses

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 63

N=393

N=58

N=1,077

N=238

N=3,290

N=174

OFFENSESEVERITY

20-30

months

*MandatorysentencesareexcludedCSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Arraignmentin

DistrictCourt/BMC

Sentencedin

DistrictCourt/BMC

Indicted&Sentencedin

SuperiorCourt

Level3

District/BMC

Level4

District/BMC

Level5

District/BMCLevel3

Superior

Level4

Superior

Level5

Superior

Thedecisiontoindictandbringa

casetoSuperiorCourtisinformed

byvariousfactorsthatmaynotbe

fullycapturedbyoffenseseverity

level.Furthermore,offense

severitylevelissomewhatbroad

inthevaryingdegreesofoffense

severitywithinagivenlevel.

CasesthatmovethroughSuperiorCourtreceive

longersentences

100%

longer

47%

longer

82%

longer

Page 64: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Addi<onalanalysisonsentencingguidelines

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 64

Howdojudgesusethesentencingguidelinesandother

informa<oninmakingsentencingdecisions?

Howmanycasesapplytothesentencinggridandwhere

dotheytypicallyfall?

Whatarethesentencingoutcomesforthesameoffense

withsimilarcriminalhistory?

Shouldprocessesbeimprovedtocreatemoreconsistency

andstandardiza<oninsentencing?

Whatarerela<vecostsandrecidivismoutcomesforsimilar

individualsreceivingdifferenttypesofsentences?

ü ü ü 

Page 65: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 65

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

CWOFs

KEYSENTENCINGSTATUTES

SENTENCINGGUIDELINES

DOC&HOCSTRUCTURE

POST-RELEASESUPERVISION

DetailedDiscussionofKeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

Thislistispresentedinorderofanindividual’s

progressionthroughthecriminaljus7cesystem

anddoesnotreflectorderofpriorityorimpact.

Page 66: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

DOCandcountyfacili<es*managesimilarlysizedpopula<ons

andreceivesimilarlevelsofstatefunding

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 66

*Countyfacili<esincludebothjailsandHOCs.

Thereare17prisonfacili(esand14jail/HOCfacili(esinMassachuse2s

Ø  Correc<onssystemfundingwas

consolidatedin2010via

appropria<onsbillsSenate,No.

2121andHouse,No.4181

Ø  Asaresultoftheconsolida<on,all14independentlyelected

sheriffsinthestatereceiveall

fundingthroughthestate

generalappropria<onsact

Ø  Thefinancialshijwasmeantto

createmorefinancialstabilityfor

sheriffsandreducetotalcosts

StatePrison CountyJail/HOC

Year-EndPopula(on(2013)

10,099(11%ofsystem)

11,125(12%ofsystem)

FY14Budget

$583m(45%ofsystem)

$553m(42%ofsystem)

Source:MassachusePsExecu<veOfficeforAdministra<onandFinance,StateBudgetSummary,2015

Page 67: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

AnumberofoffensescanbesentencedtoeitherHOCor

stateprison

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 67

HouseofCorrec(on1day–2.5years Therearemorethan

480offensesdefinedinstatutethatcanresultinasentencetoeitherHOCorstateprison

Source:MassachusePsGeneralLawsChapter126,Sec<ons4,8and23andChapter279Sec<on24.

HouseofCorrec(on1day–2.5years

Stateprison1+year

1year–2.5years

DISTRICTCOURT/BMCDistrictCourtjudgeshavethe

op<ontosentencetoHOCup

to30months

SUPERIORCOURTSuperiorCourtjudgeshavethe

op<ontosentencetoHOCfor

upto30monthsortostate

prisonforuptoanylength

allowedbystatute

Page 68: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Three-quartersofsentencestoHOCareforlessthanoneyear

68

6,401

47%

3,891

29%

8656%

2,479

18%

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

Misdemeanor

sentences

Felony

sentences

Lessthan1Year

1–2½Years

79

859

920

943

1,660

1,940

Weapons

Other

DrugPoss

Property

MotorVehicle

Persons

Thestatespendsupto$48million*eachyearincarcera<ngmisdemeanoroffendersforshortsentences

WhataretherecidivismratesforthoseleavingHOCalerservingashortsentence?

NearlyhalfofMV

offenseswere

Drivingwith

SuspendedLicense

SentencestoHOCbyOffense,2013

N=13,636

MisdemeanorSentencesLessthan1Year,2013

N=6,401

*Theabovefigureisacostes<mate.Amorethoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojecttoes<matecostsandpoten<alsavingsofspecificprac<cesandpolicies,andmaydifferfromwhatisshownhere.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata;MassachusePsSheriffsAssocia<onFY2013andFY2014costperInmate.Thecalcula<onrepresentsanaveragecostacross

countyfacili<es.Someofthecostperinmateinforma<onincludesbothcountyjailandHOCcosts.

Page 69: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

StateprisonandHOCsentencesaresimilarlydistributedacrossoffenses,

butstateprisonsentencesareformoreseverecrimesthanHOCsentences

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 69

193

0

2

57

454

282

479

200

110

77

0 100 200 300 400 500

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

155

782

155220

482

29 31

179

1,199

259

3,111

891

465

266

2,380

179

1,0551,000

1,763

889

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

Felony

HOCFelony

HOCMisdemeanor

Violent/Sex

8%

Persons

42%

Weapons

8%

Property

12%

Drug

26%

MV

2%

Other

2%

0

10%

SentencestoHOCandStatePrisonbyOffense,2013SentencestoStatePrisonbyOffenseSeverityLevel,2013

1,091

1,059

3,597

5,846

1,539

453

43

8

0

0

0 2,000 4,000 6,000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

SentencestoHOCbyOffenseSeverityLevel,2013

CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Low

Severity

High

Severity

Low

Severity

High

Severity

Page 70: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

26%

34%

21%18%

23%

39%

21%

17%

18-24 25-34 35-44 45orolder

HOC

DOC

Demographiccomposi<onofsentencestoHOCand

stateprison

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 70

64%

18%16%

2%

44%

26%27%

3%

White Black Hispanic Other

HOC

DOC 88%

12%

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2014CARIsentencingdata.

2013SentencestoHOCandStatePrisonbyRace

2013SentencestoHOCandStatePrisonbyAge

2013SentencestoHOCandStatePrisonbyGender

Male

Female96%

4%

Male

Female

DOCHOC

Page 71: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

2013SentencestoStatePrison

One-thirdofsentencestostateprisonrequiremandatory

incarcera<onforamotorvehicle,drug,weapons,orpersonoffense

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 71

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Other MV Drug Property Weapons Persons Violent

sex

offense

Mandatory

Nomandatory

N=1,854

67%mandatory

100%mandatory

96%mandatory

10%mandatory

*Mandatorypersonsoffensessentencedtoprisonwerelifesentences

5%

0%

59%

36%

Other

Possession

Distribu<on

Trafficking N=174

N=286

8%

44%

48%

0%

Other

Possession

Distribu<on

Trafficking

N=910

N=836

CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

2013SentencestoStatePrisonforDrugOffenses

2013SentencestoHOCforDrugOffenses

Page 72: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

7,996

2,327

1,999

259

711

156 16226

White Black Hispanic Other

HOCNon-Mandatory

HOCMandatory

MandatorysentencestoHOCandDOCbyrace

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 72

2013Non-MandatoryandMandatorySentencestoHOCbyRace

Non-MandatoryN=12,581,MandatoryN=1,055

649

279 287

36

176

209 205

13

White Black Hispanic Other

DOCNon-Mandatory

DOCMandatory

2013Non-MandatoryandMandatorySentencestoDOCbyRace

Non-MandatoryN=1,251,MandatoryN=603

8%ofsentencestoHOCare

mandatories

33%ofsentencestoDOCare

mandatories

CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 73: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Nearlythree-quartersofallsentenceswereimposedon

peoplewithatleastsomecriminalhistory

73

16%

21%

26%

18%

19%

21%

38%

34%

33%

28%

26%

20%

HOC

StatePrison

AllSentences

0priors 1to2priors 3to10priors 11ormorepriors

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

NumberofPriorConvic<onsbySentenceType,2013

Whatisthecostofthesereturnstoincarcera(on?

Whatimpactcouldrecidivismreduc(onstrategieshaveonHOCandstateprisonpopula(ons?

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIandiCORIdata.Criminalhistoriesarecalculatedusingthenumberofincidentsandincludesadultcriminalhistoryonly.

Page 74: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

ArevolvingdoorexistswithHOCsentencesandDOC

74CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter

ofindividualssentencedtoDOCin2013hadaprior

HOCsentenceswithinthelastthreeyearsof

sentencingdata(sinceFY2010)

Sentencedto

HOC

Sentencedto

DOC

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

ofpeoplesentencedtoHOCin2013hadaprior

HOCsentencewithinthelastthreeyearsof

sentencingdata(sinceFY2010)43%

ofpeoplesentencedtoDOCin2013hadaprior

HOCsentencewithinthelastthreeyearsof

sentencingdata(sinceFY2010)31%

RELEASESFROMHOC

Page 75: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Addi<onalanalysisonHOCsandstateprison

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 75

WhattypesofoffensesaredrivingHOCandstateprison

sentences?

Whatistheoffenseseverityandcriminalhistoryforpeople

sentencedtoHOCandstateprison?

WhatisthelengthofsentencestoHOC?

WhoisinHOCandstateprisonforasupervisionviola<on

versusanewcrime?

Whatistheriskandneedsassessmentinforma<onforthis

popula<onandhowisitusedindeterminingtreatment

andprogramming?

Whatarethepropor<onofpeoplewithinHOCandstate

prisonthatareparoleeligibleandhowdoesgood<me

impacttheirsentence?

ü ü ü 

Page 76: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 76

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

CWOFs

KEYSENTENCINGSTATUTES

SENTENCINGGUIDELINES

DOC&HOCSTRUCTURE

POST-RELEASESUPERVISION

DetailedDiscussionofKeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

Thislistispresentedinorderofanindividual’s

progressionthroughthecriminaljus7cesystem

anddoesnotreflectorderofpriorityorimpact.

Page 77: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Sentencingop<onsresultinrestric<ngandrequiringpost-

releasesupervision

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 77

Sentencingpolicyandprac(cethatsetslimita(onsonPAROLE

Sentencingpolicyandprac(cethatallowopportuni(esforPROBATION

MIN/MAXRATIO

Ø  Reducingtherangebetweentheminandmax

resultsinashorterwindowofparoleeligibility.

Ø  “Andaday”sentencesareacommonprac<ce

ofsexngthemaxwithinonedayofthemin.

MANDATORYMINIMUMS

Ø  Restric<onsonpar<cipa<oninpre-release

programspriortominimumterm.

HOCPAROLE

Ø  HOCsentencesshorterthan60daysarenot

paroleeligible.

FROM&AFTERPROBATION

Ø  Asentencetoproba<onfollowingasentence

toincarcera<on.

Ø  Musthavemul<plechargesatsentencing.

Ø  AllowableforbothHOCandstateprison

sentences.

SPLITSENTENCES

Ø  Asuspendedsentenceofproba<onfollowinga

sentencetoHOC.

Ø  Applicableonasinglecharge.

Ø  AllowableforHOC,butnotforstateprison

sentences.

Opportuni<esforproba<onreferstopost-releasesupervisiononly.Source:CSGJus<ceCenterreviewofMassachusePsGeneralLaws.

Page 78: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Theflexibilityofsentencingop<onshasanimpactonthe

consistencyofpost-releasesupervisionop<ons

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 78

HOCSENTENCINGOPTIONS

OPTIONS POST-RELEASEIMPACT

Splitsentence

60+daysentence/

splitorF&A

<60daysentence Noparole

Proba<on

Proba<on&

paroleeligible

DOCSENTENCINGOPTIONS

(availableonlytosuperiorcourtjudges)

From&ajer

sentence

“Andaday”sentence

Proba<on&

paroleeligible

Noparole

OPTIONS POST-RELEASEIMPACT

891

698

603

Fromandajer

Andaday

Mandatory

1,854totalstate

prison

sentences

3,507

1,055

1,033

Splitsentence

Mandatory

Fromandajer

13,636totalHOC

sentences

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisofCARIsentencingdata.

Whilemandatorysentences

donotprecludeparole,some

policiesresultinrestric<onof

par<cipa<oninpre-release

programsun<lthemandatory

minimumtermhasbeen

completed,whichmayhave

animpactonparole.

Page 79: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Ascriminalhistoryscoreincreases,thelikelihoodofreceiving

apost-releaseproba<onsentencedecreases

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 79

51%48% 49%

42%40%

34%

30%

24%

No/MinorRecord ModerateRecord SeriousRecord ViolentorRepe<<veRecord

StatePrison HOC

CriminalHistorySource:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

PercentofSentencestoIncarcera<onwithPost-ReleaseProba<onbyCriminalHistoryScore,2013

Howaredecisionsaboutpost-releasesupervisionmade?

Aretheindividuals

mostlikelytobenefitfrompost-

releasesupervisiontheonesreceivingit?

31% 39% 32% 37%

Stateprisonsentenceswithan

“andaday”sentenceoutofthose

withnopost-releaseproba<on.

Page 80: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Peoplewithmorethanthreeprioroffensesweremorelikelyto

receivestraightHOCsentenceswithnopost-releaseproba<on*

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 80

13%

20%

24%

17%

21%

25%

38%

38%

32%

32%

21%

19%

StraightHOC

HOCSplit

HOCFrom&Ajer

0priors 1to2priors 3to10priors 11ormorepriors

NumberofPriorOffensesfor2013SentencesbySentenceType

*StraightHOCsentencesover60daysareparoleeligibleiftheindividualdoesnotwaivetheirparolehearingSource:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

N=1,033

N=3,507

N=9,096

Post-ReleaseProba(on

70%ofstraight

HOCsentences

have3ormore

prioroffenses

60%ofstraightHOCsentenceswillbeeligibleforparoleduetosentencelengthandthereforemay

bereviewedbytheparoleboardtodeterminereleasetopost-releasesupervision.

Page 81: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Drugandpropertyoffensesweretheleastlikelytoreceivea

sentenceofpost-releaseproba<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 81

76%

51%48%

36%38%

69%

32%

37%

41%

19%

14%

23%

13%

HOC-Felony HOC-Misdemeanor

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

PercentofSentenceswithPost-releaseProba<onbyOffenseType,2013

Violentsex

offense

N=179

Persons

N=3,579

Weapon

N=438

Property

N=4,166

Drug

N=1,891

MotorVehicle

N=2,228

Other

N=1,155

19% 35% 22% 13% 21% 48% 12% 47% 3% 76% 28% 73%

Percentofcases

noteligiblefor

paroledueto

sentencelength

outofthosenot

receiving

proba<on

Page 82: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

620

387

233

355

245

110

536

447

89

343

172

171

Nearly20%ofstateprisonsentencesrestrictparoleandhave

noguaranteedpost-releaseproba<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 82

NoAndaDayorFrom&Ajer

From&Ajer+AndaDay

From&Ajer

AndaDay

Mandatory

Sentences

N=603

Non-Mandatory

Sentences

N=1,251

TotalStatePrison

Sentences

N=1,854

39% 18% 15% 28%

31% 20% 36% 14%

33% 19% 29% 19%

698total“andaday”sentences

2013StatePrisonSentences

AndaDayAsentencewiththeminimumand

maximumsentenceonedayapart

From&Aler

Asentenceofpost-releaseproba<on

From&Aler+AndaDay

Asentenceofpost-releaseproba<on

aswellasminandmaxonedayapart

NoAndaDayorFrom&AlerNosentenceofpost-release

proba<onandtheperiodbetween

minandmaxlongerthanoneday42%haveasentencerangeofoneyearorless

20to50percentofstateprisonsentenceswillbereviewedbytheparoleboardtodetermine

eligibilityandreleasetopost-releasesupervision.

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 83: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Drugoffenseswerethemostlikelytohavean“AndaDay”

sentencewithoutpost-releaseproba<on

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 83

19%

9% 9%

17% 16%

41%

Total Violentsex

offense

Persons Weapons Property DrugN=1,776 N=155N=782 N=220 N=482

LifeSentencesareExcluded

Ofthe195drug

sentenceswithan“and

aday”sentencewithout

post-releaseproba<on,

morethantwo-thirds

weremandatory

sentences.

StatePrison“AndaDay”SentencesasaPercentofTotal,2013

N=155

Source:CSGJus<ceCenteranalysisof2013CARIsentencingdata.

Page 84: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Confidenceinproba<onisevenlydistributedbetween

DistrictandSuperiorCourt,butvariedforparole

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 84

*DistrictCourtresponsesincludeBostonMunicipaljudges.CSGJus<ceCenterelectronicsurveyofMassachusePsjudges,March2016.45BostonMunicipalandDistrictCourtjudgesand30superiorcourtjudgespar<cipatedinthesurvey.

18%

10%

76%

77%

13%

13%

DistrictCourt*

SuperiorCourt

JudicialConfidenceinProba<on

Howconfidentareyouthatproba(on

iseffec(veinprotec(ng

communitysafety?

4%

3%

29%

63%

13%

17%

53%

17%

DistrictCourt*

SuperiorCourt

JudicialConfidenceinParole

Howconfidentareyouthatparoleis

effec(veinprotec(ng

communitysafety?

VeryConfident SomewhatConfident NotVeryConfident

Idonothaveadequateinforma<ontoanswerthisques<on

VeryConfident SomewhatConfident NotVeryConfident

Page 85: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Addi<onalanalysisonpost-releasesupervision

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 85

Whoislikelytoreceivepost-releasesupervision?

Whatkindofoffenses/offendersojendonotreceivepost-

releasesupervision?

Whoisbeingreleasedwithoutpost-releasesupervisionat

bothHOCandstateprisonfacili<es?

Whatotherobstaclestoreleaseonparoleexistbeyond

sentencing?

HowdoessentencingimpactHOCandstateprison

classifica<onandaccesstoprogramming,treatment,and

reentryplanning?

Whataretherecidivismratesforpeoplewhodoreceive

post-releasesupervision?Forthosewhodonot?

ü ü 

Page 86: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Presenta<onOverview

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 86

SystemOverview

Execu(veSummary

KeyStatutes,Policies,andPrac(ces

SummaryofFindingsandNextSteps

Page 87: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

KEYFINDING:Peoplewithpreviousjus<cesysteminvolvementare

responsibleforthree-quartersofnewconvic<ons

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 87

Recidivismdrivesmostnewconvic<onac<vity:74percentofpeoplesentencedhadapriorconvic<onand66percenthadahistoryofatleastoneCon<nuanceWithoutaFinding(CWOF).

Morethan40percentofpeoplesentencedtoanHOChadapriorHOCsentencewithinthepreviousthreeyears.

Peopleconvictedofpropertyoffenseshadthehighestnumberofprior

offenses.

Page 88: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

KEYFINDING:Motorvehicleandpropertyoffensesaccount

foralargevolumeofshortsentencestoHOC

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 88

NearlyhalfofallsentencestoHOC(6,394convic<ons)wereformotor

vehicleandpropertyoffenses.

54percentofmotorvehicleandpropertyHOCconvic<ons(3,464

convic<ons)werefor6monthsorless.Peoplereceivedanaveragesentenceof7.3monthsforpropertyand4.4monthsformotorvehicle

offenses.

39percentofallmisdemeanorsentencestoHOCwereformotorvehicle

andpropertyoffenses,including271convic<onsforLarcenyunder$250.819motorvehiclesentencestoHOCwereforOpera(ngwithaSuspendedLicense.

Thestatespentupto$15million*onincarcera<onformisdemeanor

motorvehicleandpropertyoffenses.

*Theabovefigureisacostes7mate.Amorethoroughfiscalimpactanalysiswillbeconductedlaterintheprojecttoes7matecostsandpoten7alsavingsofspecificprac7cesandpolicies,andmaydifferfromwhatisshownhere.

Page 89: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

KEYFINDING:Sentencingprac<cesimpactwhetherpeople

sentencedtoincarcera<onreceivepost-releasesupervision

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 89

Nearlyhalfofsentencestostateprisonincludedasentenceofpost-releaseproba<on.

19percentofstateprisonsentencespreventanypost-releasesupervision,solelybasedonthesentence;drugsentencesweremost

likelytorestrictpost-releasesupervision.

Thelikelihoodofreceivingapost-releaseproba<onsentencedecreased

ascriminalhistoryscoreincreased.

Two-thirdsofHOCsentenceswerestraightsentencesthatdidnotincludepost-releaseproba<on,and40percentofpeoplewhoreceivedstraightsentenceswillnotbeeligibleforparoleduetosentencelength.

Page 90: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

Jus<cereinvestment<meline

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 90

WorkingGroup(WG)

Mee(ng1

ImpactAnalysis

DataAnalysis

Ini<al

AnalysisDetailedDataAnalysis

WG

Mee<ng

2BillIntroduc(on

FinalReportReleased

PolicymakerandStakeholderEngagement

StakeholderEngagementandPolicymakerBriefings PolicyOp<onDevelopmentOngoing

engagement

WG

Mee<ng5:

Ini<alPolicy

Op<on

Discussion

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Oct–Dec 2017Session

WG

Mee<ng

3

Steeringcommi;eetomeet1–2weeksinadvanceofeachworkinggroupmee7ng

WG

Mee<ng

4

WGMee<ng

6:

FinalPolicy

Op<ons

Discussion

Sept

Page 91: CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review · CSG Jus(ce Center—Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review Working Group Mee.ng 2 Key statutory frameworks, sentencing policies,

CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenter 91

ThankYouCassondraWarney,[email protected]

ThismaterialwaspreparedfortheStateofMassachusePs.Thepresenta<onwas

developedbymembersoftheCouncilofStateGovernmentsJus<ceCenterstaff.

Becausepresenta<onsarenotsubjecttothesamerigorousreviewprocessas

otherprintedmaterials,thestatementsmadereflecttheviewsoftheauthors,and

shouldnotbeconsideredtheofficialposi<onoftheJus<ceCenter,themembers

oftheCouncilofStateGovernments,orthefundingagencysuppor<ngthework.

C SG J U S T I C E C EN T E R . O RG / SUB S C R I B E