Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

18
Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013

description

Previous Work Poon and Granger (2003) Gray (1996) Klaassen (2002) Marcucci (2005) 3

Transcript of Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

Page 1: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

Crude Oil Price Volatility

Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor

March 22, 2013

Page 2: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

2

Why the Crude Oil Market?

• Many implications of crude oil price uncertainty on the macroeconomy.

• Higher oil prices lead to higher production costs, which have a negative effect on GDP growth.

• The Federal Reserve considers oil price volatility when setting monetary policy.

• Large movements in oil prices may cause firms to delay investments or to alter production.

Page 3: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

3

Previous Work

• Poon and Granger (2003)• Gray (1996)• Klaassen (2002)• Marcucci (2005)

Page 4: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

4

Main Focus

• Model and forecast crude oil price volatility.

• GARCH and MS-GARCH models.

Page 5: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

5

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

Daily Returns of Oil Prices1/2/1986 to 12/30/2011

Daily Returns

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Page 6: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

6

Data

• Monthly spot prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil.

• Sample period: January 2, 1986 to December 31, 2012.

• Daily returns.• Returns are characterized by mean reversion, fat-

tails, asymmetry, and volatility clustering.• Student’s t or Generalized Error Distribution

(GED) is appropriate.

Page 7: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

7

Descriptive Statistics

MeanStandardDeviation Min Max Variance Skewness Kurtosis

0.01877 2.5731 -40.6395 19.1506 6.6213 -0.7567 17.5698

Note: Descriptive statistics for WTI rates of return. The sample period is January 2, 1986 to December 31, 2012 for 6812 observations.

Page 8: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

8

GARCH Model

• Where μt is the time varying conditional mean.• α0, α1, and γ1 are all positive• α1 + γ1 < 1 • Distributions for ηt Student’s t and GED

Page 9: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

9

1/2/86

1/2/87

1/2/88

1/2/89

1/2/90

1/2/91

1/2/92

1/2/93

1/2/94

1/2/95

1/2/96

1/2/97

1/2/98

1/2/99

1/2/00

1/2/01

1/2/02

1/2/03

1/2/04

1/2/05

1/2/06

1/2/07

1/2/08

1/2/09

1/2/10

1/2/11

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

GARCH Conditional Variance

GARCH Conditional Variance

Date

Volatility

Page 10: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

10

MS-GARCH Model

• Both μSt and ht are subject to the hidden Markov chain St

• Transition probability matrix:

• However, estimation is intractable due to path dependence.

Page 11: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

11

Klaassen’s (2002) Solution

• Klaassen’s approach eliminates path dependence• Multi-step ahead volatility forecasts are relatively

straightforward.

Page 12: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

12

GARCH ResultsMaximum Likelihood Estimates

GARCH-N  δ 0.0281  (0.0216)σ 2.5668  (0.0125)α1 0.1065  (0.0042)γ1 0.8737  (0.0055)α1 + γ1 0.9802Log(L) -11369.1015

Page 13: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

13

MS-GARCH Results

• This confirms there are two volatility states for all models.

• State two is dominant.

Table 3: Selected Maximum Likelihood Estimates of MS-GARCH Models MRS-GARCH-N MRS-GARCH-t2 MRS-GARCH-GEDσ(1) 4.4564 1.4719 0.4627  (0.3712) (0.0622) (0.0313)σ(2) 1.6242 2.5998 2.3075  (0.0122) (0.0272) (0.0318)π1 0.1464 0.2866 0.4127π2 0.8536 0.7134 0.5873α(1)

1 + γ(1)1 0.7855 0.8887 0.9674

α(2)1 + γ(2)

1 0.9812  0.9825  0.9808

Page 14: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

14

MS-GARCH ResultsTable 3: Selected Maximum Likelihood Estimates of MS-GARCH Models

MRS-GARCH-N MRS-GARCH-t2 MRS-GARCH-GEDν(1) - 6.5624 1.3579  (1.0273) (0.0266)ν(2) - 6.0386  (0.4622)

Log(L) -14520.1688  -14369.9502  -14410.1269

N. of Par. 10 12 11

Page 15: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

15

1/2/08

1/14/08

1/26/0

8

2/7/08

2/19/08

3/2/08

3/14/0

8

3/26/0

8

4/7/08

4/19/0

8

5/1/08

5/13/0

8

5/25/08

6/6/08

6/18/08

6/30/08

7/12/0

8

7/24/0

8

8/5/08

8/17/0

8

8/29/0

8

9/10/0

8

9/22/0

8

10/4/08

10/16/08

10/28/08

11/9/08

11/21/08

12/3/08

12/15/08

12/27/08

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1401-Day Forecast of GARCH-N vs. Realized Volatility

GARCH-N 1 Day Forecast Realized Volatility

Vola

tility

Vola

tility

Page 16: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

16

1/2/08

1/12/0

8

1/22/0

8

2/1/08

2/11/08

2/21/0

8

3/2/08

3/12/0

8

3/22/0

8

4/1/08

4/11/0

8

4/21/0

8

5/1/08

5/11/0

8

5/21/0

8

5/31/08

6/10/0

8

6/20/0

8

6/30/0

8

7/10/08

7/20/0

8

7/30/0

8

8/9/08

8/19/08

8/29/0

8

9/8/08

9/18/0

8

9/28/0

8

10/8/08

10/18/08

10/28/08

11/7/08

11/17/08

11/27/08

12/7/08

12/17/08

12/27/08

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1-Day Forecast of MS-GARCH-N vs. Realized Volatility

MS GARCH-N 1 Day Forecast Realized Volatility

Vola

tility

Vola

tility

Page 17: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

17

Evaluation of Volatility Forecasts

• Seven different loss functions used for in sample comparison of MS-GARCH models.

• MS-GARCH-t2 ranks first or second in all but one.

• A model where the degrees of freedom parameter is allowed to switch between regimes seems the best.

• Out-of-sample forecast evaluation forthcoming.

Page 18: Crude Oil Price Volatility Ana María Herrera, Liang Hu, Daniel Pastor March 22, 2013.

18

Questions?