Crooked Judge Honeywell's Rule of Rape

8/9/2019 Crooked Judge Honeywell's Rule of Rape

1/26

4

trickery and conceal said record fake land parcels, said record fake resolution [O.R.

569/875], and fake condemnation claims. No state remedy was everidentifiedhere.

Here, Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed that the Plaintiffs could not be coerced

into pleading inverse condemnation, because the Plaintiffs categorically and rightfully

defended against any unlawful exchange of their title and the Government corruption and

fraud on the public record.

DEFENDANT WHORE HONEYWELL UPHELD THE RULE OF RAPE

8. Just like the Pope presided over a Church in which priests raped children and innocent

victims, here Defendant legal whore Honeywell presided over judicial rape, corruption,

and extortion under color of record fake land parcels and facially forged law. Just like

psychopath Catholic Church Officials, Honeywell covered up and concealed.

9. On the record, the Plaintiffs objected to Honeywells rule of Government rape. Here, the

record series of Defendant Honeywells idiotic illegal orders and judgment documented

Honeywells pattern and policy of NOT upholding but PERVERTING the law and acting

like a cheap Government whore. Here, Government Crook Honeywell swore on the bible

with the intent to rape innocent Plaintiffs and fraudulently conceal, e.g., U.S. corruption and

said forged land parcels.

IDIOTICDEFENSES& CLAIMSOF RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS

10. Here, Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell knew that the named party Defendants, Officials,

and/or Defendant Attorney Fesak knew that no ripeness requirements had ever existed in

order for Plaintiffs to plead, e.g., well-proven record fraud, corruption, extortion, bribery, and

deliberate 1st, 14

th, 7

th, and 4

thU.S. Const. Amendment deprivations. Here, Defendants and


2/26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDAFORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;

KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;

RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE

ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendants.

EMERGENCY MOTION

____________________________________________________________________________/

EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECUSE DEFENDANT CROOKED JUDGE

CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL FOR RECORD FRAUD ON THE COURT,

CORRUPTION, FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT & OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL HAD MULTIPLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

1. Defendant presiding crooked U.S. Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell had multiple recorded

conflicts of interest and fraudulently concealed, e.g., Government and judicial corruption,

extortion, fraud, bribery, conspiracy to defraud and deprive, and deliberate deprivations on

the record under color of fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-

00001.0000, facially forged law / resolution O.R. 569/875.

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL WAS OBJECTIVELY UNFIT, PARTIAL & CROOKED


3/26

2

2. Here nofit, rational, and honestjudge could havepossibly dismissedPlaintiffs Case(s) and

concocted frivolity and vexatiousness when the record had conclusively proven brazen

prima facie corruption, fraud, extortion, bribery, and facially forged land parcels.

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL FIXED PLAINTIFFS CASE # 2:09-CV-00791

3. Defendant Honeywell fixed Plaintiffs Case 2:2009-cv-00791 by fraudulently and idiotically

perverting the public record evidence of Plaintiffs unimpeachable ownership of and

marketable title to riparian Lot 15A on the Gulf of Mexico, STRAP # 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A as legally described and conveyed in reference to the 1912 Cayo Costa

Subdivision Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25. See Doc. # 213; 2:2009-cv-00791.

PLAINTIFF RECORD LANDOWNERS SUED DEF. CORRUPT JUDGE HONEYWELL

4. EXPRESSLY, the Plaintiffs sued Defendant corrupt U.S. Judge Honeywell in her private

individual capacity, because Honeywell perpetrated, e.g., fraud, fraud on the Courts,

fraudulent concealment of Government corruption, which were outside the scope of her

official capacity. See Case # 2:2010-cv-00390.

PLAINTIFFS DIRECTLY ATTACKED HONEYWELLS FRAUDULENT ORDERS

5. Here, the Plaintiffs directly attacked Defendant crooked Judge Honeywells facially

fraudulent orders and judgments, which were based on, e.g., record fabrications of, e.g., fake

land parcels, a fake resolution [O.R.569/875], and fake frivolity and vexatiousness

defenses / claims.

HONEYWELLS ORDERS TO CONCEAL FRAUD & KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY

6. Just like a desperate and isolated criminal on the run, Honeywell can no longer hide

and cover up. In her facially fraudulent order, Doc. # 236, 07/02/10, corrupt Case Fixer

Honeywell perverted the law and fraudulently pretended under color of official right:


4/26

3

The Clerk is further directed to no longer accept ANY filings from Plaintiffs in

this case because a [facially fraudulent] judgment has been entered and

Plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal as to the Courts Order (Dkt. 213), and

this case is CLOSED [FIXED].

Finally, the Clerk is also directed to strike Published Public Notices from the record(Dkt. 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 229, 230, 232, 233, 234, 235). See Doc. # 236, p. 3.

Here, Honeywell had no authority and/or official right to illegally fix Plaintiffs Case and

fraudulently conceal the record truth of, e.g., fake land parcels and a fake resolution, and

obstruct justice. Here, Defendant objectively crooked presiding Judge Honeywell evaded her

own prosecution by perpetrating fraud on the Court and making self-serving orders

such as, e.g., Doc. ## 213, 236.

HONEYWELL CONSPIRED WITH OTHER DEFENDANTS TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE

7. Here Defendant objectively partial and corrupt Judge Honeywell knew that the sued

Defendants could not possibly have, and of course had no immunity. However here,

Defendant Attorney Matthew L. Fesak deceived the Court by fraudulently and ignorantly

pretending blanket immunity. See Doc. # 29, p. 5. Furthermore, Defendant Attorney

Matthew L. Fesak materially misrepresented, id., p. 2:

Plaintiffs first case was not facially improper, but after a full and fair opportunity tolitigate their case, Plaintiffs complaint was dismissed as unripe because Plaintiffs had

not availed themselves of state remedies.

Here, Defendant Judge Honeywell knew that bungling Defendant Attorney Fesak, North

Carolina Bar No. 35276, was unfamiliar with Florida property law. In particular, Honeywell

knew that Defendant Fesak was unfit and dishonest with regard to, e.g., Florida Statutes,

Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN; Ch. 95, ADVERSE POSSESSION; Ch. 712,

MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT. Here, Defendants Honeywell and Fesak conspired

with other Defendants to perpetrate and/or perpetuate the other Defendants deception and


5/26

4

trickery and conceal said record fake land parcels, said record fake resolution [O.R.

569/875], and fake condemnation claims. No state remedy was everidentifiedhere.

Here, Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed that the Plaintiffs could not be coerced

into pleading inverse condemnation, because the Plaintiffs categorically and rightfully

defended against any unlawful exchange of their title and the Government corruption and

fraud on the public record.

DEFENDANT WHORE HONEYWELL UPHELD THE RULE OF RAPE

8. Just like the Pope presided over a Church in which priests raped children and innocent

victims, here Defendant legal whore Honeywell presided over judicial rape, corruption,

and extortion under color of record fake land parcels and facially forged law. Just like

psychopath Catholic Church Officials, Honeywell covered up and concealed.

9. On the record, the Plaintiffs objected to Honeywells rule of Government rape. Here, the

record series of Defendant Honeywells idiotic illegal orders and judgment documented

Honeywells pattern and policy of NOT upholding but PERVERTING the law and acting

like a cheap Government whore. Here, Government Crook Honeywell swore on the bible

with the intent to rape innocent Plaintiffs and fraudulently conceal, e.g., U.S. corruption and

said forged land parcels.

IDIOTICDEFENSES& CLAIMSOF RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS

10. Here, Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell knew that the named party Defendants, Officials,

and/or Defendant Attorney Fesak knew that no ripeness requirements had ever existed in

order for Plaintiffs to plead, e.g., well-proven record fraud, corruption, extortion, bribery, and

deliberate 1st, 14

th, 7

th, and 4

thU.S. Const. Amendment deprivations. Here, Defendants and


6/26

5

their Attorney gave no explanation orjustification, whatsoever, in support of their facially

idiotic defenses.

CONSPIRACY TO KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY FROM U.S. COURTS

11. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Def. Fesak conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently

pretend state remedies which Fesak and the other Defendants and Officials knew to be a

prima facie hoax, because the Plaintiffs could of course plead their ripe claims for relief

directly in Federal Court. Fesak and the Defendant Officials knew and fraudulently

concealed that the Plaintiffs had no intent to exchange their unimpeachable record title but

rightfully defended their ownership against fraud, extortion, bribery, and corruption under

color of fake paper O.R. 569/875.

RECORD EMERGENCIES OF CORRUPTION, BRIBERY, AND FRAUD ON COURTS

12. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the judicial and Government corruption, fraud, bribery, and

extortion on record were EMERGENCIES, because they violently injured the American

people. The Plaintiffs and American people had fundamental rights to be free of record

brazen idiotic Government oppression in State and Federal Courts since 2006. See, e.g.,

judicial and Government concealment of facially fraudulent land, parcel, and

condemnation claims and defenses such as, e.g., O.R. 569/875.

PATTERN & POLICY OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ORDERS / JUDGMENTS

13. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that no intelligentandfitjudge and/or official in the Defendants

and Officials shoes could havepossiblydeterminedthat Lee County had any official right

to claim land and illegally fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and

07-44-21-01-00001.0000. See Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN, Ch. 95, ADVERSE

POSSESSION; Ch. 712, MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT.


7/26

6

THE U.S. DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENTLY PRETENDED UNRIPE CLAIMS

ADMITTEDLY FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF UNRIPE CLAIMS

14. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the judicial Defendants conceded the record fraud on the

Court that

Plaintiffs complaint was dismissed as unripe, because Plaintiffs had not availedthemselves of state remedies. See Doc. # 29, p. 2

Here admittedly, the Defendants knew and fraudulently concealed that fraud, corruption,

extortion, and bribery of course could of course be directly pleaded in Federal Court:

must comply not only with but also with Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)s heightened

pleading standard. Id., p. 4.

Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs had sued the Defendant crooked Government

Officials in STATE Court, and STATE Court Defendant U.S. Judges John E. Steele and

Sheri Polster Chappell themselves had removed Plaintiffs ripe legal action from STATE to

Federal Court. Here, Federal jurisdiction had been admittedly patently clear as evidenced

by said Judges removal. Again, the record showed idiotic record Government corruption.

See attached STATE Court docket, Case # 2006-CA-003185, BUSSE v. STATE OF

FLORIDA, Lee Count Circuit Court.

JUDICIAL OFFICERS FRAUD ON THE COURTS UNDER FALSE PRETENSES

15. Here, Honeywell, and the other Defendants & Officials fraudulently kept the Plaintiffs away

from Court for the criminal purposes of obstructing justice and covering up for the fellow

crooked Government Defendants and Officials, who had, e.g., concocted a fake resolution,

fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-000001.0000 on the

public record.


8/26

7

CORRUPTION WAS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF ANY JUDICIALIMMUNITY

16. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Rules and public policy prohibited the judicial

corruption, fraud on the Courts, bribery, and extortion on the record, which the Plaintiff

whistleblowers had conclusively evidenced in multiple State and Federal lawsuits since 2006.

Said record judicial corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion were outside the scope of any

judicial immunity. Just like vexatious and vile Nazi Officials, here the judicial Defendants

pulled the wool over the peoples eyes:

Judicial immunity provides judges with blanket immunity

Here, Def. Honeywell knew that said Defendants, Officials, and Attorneys provided the

American people with a blanket of prima facie judicial horseshit for the criminal purposes

of concealment and cover-up.

RECORD FRAUD EVIDENCE AND DIRECT ATTACK ON JUDGMENT(S)/ORDER(S)

17. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that it was a hackneyed truism that res judicata does not

preclude a litigant from making a direct attack upon the judgment before the court which

renders it. A party may of course introduce fraud evidence

with the direct and primary objective of modifying, setting aside, canceling,

vacating, or enjoining the enforcement of the judgment.

See C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure at 4406. Here, the fake

resolution and land parcels were such prima facie fraud evidence on the public record,

and the Defendant judicial crooks knew and fraudulently concealed that said fake land

parcels had never beenplatted, conveyed, and/orlegally describedin reference to the 1912

Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25.


9/26

8

18. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs were of course entitled to directly attack the

prima facie fraudulent orders and judgments, because as a matter of law, involuntary

alienation of private property was never a legislative function. See also separation-of-

powers Doctrine. Just like the Katrina and Gulf oil spill disasters proved, U.S. Government

screws up all the time as it did over and over in these Cases since 2006.

19. Just like the fake weapons of mass destruction never existed, here U.S. Government

Defendants also employed weapons of mass deception such as, e.g., a fake resolution,

fake land parcels, fake frivolity, and fake vexatiousness. Defendants and Judges

prima facie idiocy on the record was again embarrassing and for the whole world to see.

IDIOTIC & INCOMPREHENSIBLE CLAIM AND/OR DEFENSE O.R. 569/875

20. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Plaintiffs lawsuits in State and Federal Courts since 2006

had conclusively proven, e.g., fraud, fraud on the Courts, corruption, extortion, and deliberate

deprivations under color of, e.g., sham claim and/or defense O.R. 569/875, which the

law did not recognize. Here, Defendants sham defense and/or claim of a resolution

(non-existent O.R. 569/875) were facially idiotic and incomprehensible. As a matter of

law, no lawmaker could have possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their property against

Plaintiffs will. Any valid condemnation and/or involuntary alienation would have

exclusively been a judicial function. Here, no judicial proceedings and/or involuntary

alienation ever took place as conclusively evidenced by the record. Here, the Plaintiffs

defended their record unimpeachable property ownership and title against fraud, corruption,

bribery, and extortion. Here, the Defendants and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed

that there were no ripeness requirements. Here, the Plaintiffs were of course entitled to

plead prima facie fraud, corruption, extortion, and bribery in Federal Courts.


10/26

9

DEFENDANTS FAILED TODEFEND AGAINST NULL & VOID HOAX O.R. 569/875

21. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Defendant Officials failed to defendagainst said proof

and allegations on the record. In particular, said Officials and Judges failed to defend against

the idiotic pretenses of involuntary alienation by fraudulently pretended virtue of prima

facie scam and hoax O.R. 569/875.

PLAINTIFFS SUED CORRUPT U.S. OFFICIALS IN THEIR PRIVATE CAPACITIES

22. Here, Defendant Honeywell knew that because the record corruption, bribery, fraud, and

extortion by the Defendant U.S. Judges and Officials were outside the scope of any lawful

judicial and/or governmental activity, the Plaintiffs expressly sued the Defendant corrupt

Judges in theirindividual private capacities.

23. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that public policy demanded criminal investigation and

prosecution of the Defendant crooked U.S. Judges for their crimes on the public record.

24. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that U.S. Officials refused to investigate and prosecute the

Defendant corrupt Judges and Officials for the criminal purposes of concealing said record

crimes. Here, public policy had absolutely required equalprosecution. Here, judges were no

differentfrom any other citizen.

EMERGENCY OF PRIMA FACIE FRAUDULENT MOTION, DOC. # 29, 06/30/10

25. In Document 29, 06/30/10, purportedly the United States of America, by and through

its Defendant undersigned attorneys, and including Defendant crooked Attorney Matthew

Fesak, fraudulently pretended that Plaintiffs proof and allegations of, e.g., corruption,

extortion, bribery, and fraud were barred by absolute immunity, Doc. # 29, p. 1.

DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF OFFICIAL CAPACITY SUIT


11/26

10

26. Here, Defendant presiding Government Crook Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs had

expressly sued the Defendants and Officials in their private individual capacities. See Doc. #

1. However falsely and shamelessly, the Defendant crooked Judges, Officials, and Attorneys

pretended:

Insofar as this is an official capacity suit properly brought against the United Statesand not the individual federal officers See Doc. # 29, p. 5, fn 2.

DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF res judicata

27. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that unintelligently, Defendant M. Fesak, on behalf of the

crooked Officials, rambled about res judicata, Doc. # 29, p. 3:

Plaintiffs utter contempt of this Courts authority, principles ofres judicata, and

the rule of law;

Here, the rule of law prohibited Defendants and Officials fraud, fraud on the Courts,

corruption, and deliberate deprivations under color of sham land and parcel claims.

See Chapters 73, 74, 95, 712, Florida Statutes.

DEFENDANTS ABSURD & IDIOTIC IMMUNITY CLAIMS / DEFENSES

28. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that said prima facie false pretenses were absurd as easily

illustrated and explained by the fact that judges were and are of course not immune from,

e.g., murder or other crimes outside the judicial scope.

U.S. FRIVOLITY & VEXATIOUSNESS SCAMS AND COVER-UP

29. Just like, e.g., Nazi Judges in Nazi Germany were not immune from prosecution, the

Defendant Nazi-style Officials in these Government corruption Cases had to defend against

their crimes on the public record. Cover-up was not any option. Idiotically blurting out

frivolity and vexatiousness was not any option under the rule of law.


12/26

11

THE PLAINTIFFS WERE ABSOLUTELY ENTITLED TO RELIEF

30. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that, of course, the Plaintiffs were entitled to, e.g., equitable

relief. Here, said Defendants ignorance and arrogance were injurious. Here, the Plaintiffs

were entitled to defend against Government extortion and fraud scheme O.R. 569/875.

DEFENDANTS EXTORTED UNDER COLOR OF FACIALLY FAKE O.R. 569/875

31. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that said Defendants extorted and conspired to extort property

and fees under fraudulent pretenses and color of authority, office, and/or fake resolution

O.R. 569/875.

DEFENDANTS IDIOTICALLY CONCOCTED LAW [O.R. 569/875]

32. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Defendants prima facie unrecognized concoction and/or

defense oflegislative condemnation [O.R. 569/875] was an idiotic crime. Here, no fit

and intelligentjudge could havepossibly concocted such judicial trash, because any and all

involuntary alienation of property would have been exclusively a judicial function. Here, no

court judgment/orderhad everexisted, and no law was everadoptedby anyone.

NO immunity FROM GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION

33. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that EXTORTION has been defined as

"the obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or

threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right."

See Black's Law Dictionary.

"the unlawful exaction of money or property through intimidation."

See Encyclopedia Britannica.

34. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Defendants and Defendant Government Officials conspired

to fraudulently interact, defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property and

fees from the Plaintiffs under color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, no


13/26

12

Government ever had any official rightorauthority to claim any lands. Here, Defendant

Officials and Judges fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of said

Government scam O.R. 569/875.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs again demand

1. An EMERGENCY Orderremoving Judicial Officer and Defendant crooked Judge C. E.

Honeywell from these farce proceedings, because Honeywell deceived the Court and

conspired with other Defendants to keep the Plaintiffs away from Court and defraud them

under color of scam O.R. 569/875 and facially forged land parcels;

2. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Judicial Officer and Defendant crooked Judge C. E.

Honeywell, because Honeywell obstructed justice and concealed said record fake land

parcels as conclusively proven by said Plat in Lee County PB 3, Page 25 (1912);

3. An EMERGENCY Orderremoving Judicial Officer and Defendant Attorney Matthew L.

Fesak from these proceedings, because he deceived the Court and conspired with other

Defendants to keep the Plaintiffs away from Court and defraud them under color of scam

O.R. 569/875 and facially forged land parcels;

4. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials from perpetuating the perpetration of fraud on the Courts since 2006;

5. An EMERGENCY Order vacating the facially fraudulent orders and judgments in any

and all Cases of record since 2006;


other Officials from perpetrating fraud on the Courts under fraudulent pretenses of

purportedly unripe claims, because the Plaintiffs rightfully pleaded fraud, corruption,


14/26

13

extortion directly in Federal Court and defended their record ownership against Defendants

facially frivolous and fraudulent claims and defenses;


other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending res judicata and immunity,

because corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous

scam O.R. 569/875 were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawfulactivity

and did not preclude Plaintiffs direct attack on the facially fraudulent orders and judgment

by Defendant crooked Officials;

8. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining theDefendants and Officials from further concealing

the non-existence of fabricated land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-

01-00001.0000, which could not be found on said 1912 Plat in Plat Book 3, Page 25;


other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending res judicata and immunity,

because corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous

scam O.R. 569/875 were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawful activity;


other Officials on the record from the absurd pretenses of immunity, because of course the

corruption and Government crimes on the record demanded equal prosecution and

investigation of the Defendant Officials and Judges under the Rules and public policy;


other Officials from corruptly concocting frivolity and vexatiousness for criminal

purposes of extending prima facie fraud and extortion scheme O.R. 569/875 and

concealing the criminality and nullity of said scam and scandal;


15/26

14

12. An EMERGENCY Orderfor the removal of prima facie scam O.R. 569/875 from the

public record;

13. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell from concealing Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of Lot 15A, Parcel #

12-44-20-01-00015.015A, as affirmed and conclusively proven by the public record;

14. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell from maliciously perverting the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record

ownership by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th

Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of

Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);

35. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked presiding Judge Honeywell,

because she disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants,

perverted the facts of record, and could notpossibly be trusted to be impartialand fair, 28

U.S.C. 455; 18 U.S.C. 241, 242 (see Doc. # 213, 2:2009-cv-00791).

__________________________________

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro se

P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295_______________________________________

/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.

Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro se

State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;

[email protected]


16/26

15

Defendant Crooked Officials Real Estate Fraud Scheme

Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:

o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;

Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block

00001ever existed.

Fake Government ownership claims;

Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.

569/875;

Fake resolution and law claims;

Fake land parcels;

Fake frivolity defenses;

Fake vexatiousness contentions;

Fake legal descriptions:


17/26


18/26

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 14 of 18


19/26

16


20/26

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its

adoption.

The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner____________, who

moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner _____________ and,

being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:

ROBERT P. JANES

BRIAN BIGELOW

RAY JUDAH

TAMMARA HALL

FRANK MANN

DULY ADOPTED this 29th day of April, 2009.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

(SEAL)

By:Chairman

ATTEST:

Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM ANDLEGAL SUFFICIENCY

County Attorney


21/26

11


22/26

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 5 of 10


23/26

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 7 of 10


24/26

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!

JACK N. PETERSONIMAGES OF A FRAUDSTER


25/26



26/26


Crooked Judge Honeywell's Rule of Rape

Documents

Transcript of Crooked Judge Honeywell's Rule of Rape