Critical Equipment Inspections Xstrata Coal South Africa.
-
Upload
rudolph-melton -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Critical Equipment Inspections Xstrata Coal South Africa.
Critical Equipment Inspections
Xstrata Coal South Africa
2
Contents
• Historical situation• ATCOM Fatal accident 23/02/2004• Identification of critical equipment and
installations• Inspection criteria used• Out sourcing contract work• Tagging of equipment
3
Historical review
• Pre use inspection lists for equipment
• Log book system
• No physical proof of inspections conducted
• Contractors pack requirements
4
Critical equipment
• List compiled of critical equipment and installations
• Inspection criteria developed
5
ATCOM 23 February 2004
Incident -Electrocution
• Work planned to replace water column – contractors pack completed
• Task delayed – Making up of pipes – work extended into evening
• Changing conditions – rain, darkness and using different type of tools as planned
• Sub contractor bring additional undisclosed equipment onto mine
• Faulty extension lead and inadequate earth leakage protection
• Incident
• Medical condition of now deceased
• Certificate of compliance for electrical installations
6
Short Comings identified
• Appointment of responsible persons to do various inspections ( plant / opencast working)
• Listing of critical equipment and installations
• Proof that inspections were carried out – not a paper exercise
• Inspection of contractors/ sub contractors equipment
7
Tagging of equipment and out sourcing of inspection authority
• Appointment of Gear Industry – legal appointment
• Critical inspection lists developed and signed off mine engineers (include vehicle checks)
• Quality inspections carried out of facility by mine engineers
• Requirement in contractors pack that inspections were conducted and equipment tagged
• Three month inspection cycle observed
• Pre-use inspection system still in place for daily checks
8
Inspection Tagg
9
Results of inspections
Past four months:• 28% rejection on vehicles – breaks and lights• 23% rejection on vehicles – fire extinguishers• 26% rejection on electrical equipment• 25% on hydraulic/ lifting and other equipment
Improvement on the quality of equipment from contractors that have been through the process