Critical Analysis : Success and Failure Of IT projects

17
Business Project Management By Sachin Mathews -18241208 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF SOFTWARE PROJECTS

description

The paper has two objectives. One to uncover the potential reasons of software project failures and discuss the critical factors that influence successful IT projects

Transcript of Critical Analysis : Success and Failure Of IT projects

  • Business Project Management

    By

    Sachin Mathews -18241208

    CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF

    SOFTWARE PROJECTS

  • 2

  • 3

    Executive Summary

    This paper has two objectives. One to uncover the potential reasons of software project

    failures and discuss the critical factors that influence successful projects. The other to

    evaluate the validity of the statement given in assessment, that is taken from Attarzadeh

    (2008). The first part of the paper analyses the trends of IT project success rates over the

    past two decades and then describes the critical factors that cause software project failures

    in detail. The paper then tries to recognize what constitutes a successful IT Project from the

    IT industry's perspective and explore the possible ways by which success rate can be

    improved by citing few of the best practices from sources within the industry. This paper

    then discusses the research findings along with inferences drawn and finally give our

    recommendations that can help managers to better navigate the common pitfalls in IT

    project management and enable them to achieve higher success rates.

    In terms of the scope of the paper, it is limited to the reasons for failure or success of IT

    and software projects and does not go into projects related to the other management aspects

    of an organization, such as sales or marketing or the affect IT projects have on them.

    For the purpose of the research, the author of this paper mainly used articles from journals

    pertaining to Information Technology that are listed in section 2. We also used conference

    papers and world accepted reports such as IEEE, Standish Group reports, along with

    articles and popular books on this subject written by renowned experts from the industry

    and notable authors to support our research.

    The main findings of the research are that around 60 percent of IT Project fails. This

    percentage is excluding those that are challenged or have cost and schedule overruns. The

    paper broadly classifies the reasons found into three categories, which are people,

    organizational culture and processes and lack of proper resources and technological

    platforms. The paper explores the critical failure factors falling under each category in

    detail. After analysing the causes of IT project failure, we feel that the use of agile methods

    such as Crystal, Extreme programming and Rational Unified Process along with some best

    practices in terms of organizational management and having a Project Manager with

    appropriate skill set and experience and good top management support can help IT projects

    to be more successful. However we feel that further research needs to be done in order to

    find out what constitutes IT project success especially in some specific cases.

  • 4

    1. Introduction

    In this global age, an age where speed, accessibility and visibility are the talking point,

    companies rely heavily on Information Technology for their business performance. This

    fact has been validated beyond doubt as companies are incessantly trying to use IT where

    ever applicable in order to optimize their resources, be it manpower, finances, material or

    information flow and most importantly "time" to gain competitive advantage and increase

    profitability. Software companies on the other end are trying to get as many projects as

    they can to garner greater respectability, expand their business and obviously their bottom-

    line. However, it's not a rosy picture for software firms who develop these softwares.

    In November 2012, the U.S Air force had to give up the "Expeditionary Combat Support

    System" an ERP project, after it racked up $1 Billion, with only one forth its original scope

    completed. It would need additional time, and would not be completed until 2020. The

    department felt it would not be suitable as it was not improving anything in terms of

    military application and was eventually scraped. Kanaracus. (2012). There are many such

    cases of projects being scraped in various industries.

    Software projects have a high failure rate compared to other projects which is matter of

    great concern not only for the IT industry but to all those companies who use them, as it

    can incur huge losses in terms of money, time and resources as seen in the above examples.

    In this paper we explore why this happens, what are the critical factors that cause IT

    projects to fail. We also look at ways by which we can improve the success rate and

    explain some key methodologies used by successful projects. We then discuss the findings,

    weather it substantiates the statement provided in the assessment, from Attarzadeh (2008).

    Finally the paper gives its recommendations to have better success rate in the future.

  • 5

    2. Scope of the Literature Review

    3. Software Project Management

    The term "Software" is a widespread term and can be applied in a variety of ways

    depending on the requirement. For example there are real time, engineering and scientific,

    embedded, personal computer, artificial intelligence softwares. Softwares are intended to

    improve the overall efficiency of systems and process that use them. It is essential for

    business, science and engineering at hence effects all areas of life. Software applications

    are increasingly being used in various sectors such as telecom, banking, infrastructure,

    manufacturing, healthcare, hospitality, transportation, defence and government

    organizations to name a few. They have become an integral part of any office, for the main

    purpose of speeding up process by automation and information sharing. It has become the

    single most important technology in the world and is an excellent example of "law of

    unintended consequences" as described by Kelkar (2013).

    A software project like any other project is a mission to create a platform that will make the

    end user's life easy. It is limited by time, budget and people and constitutes of certain

    performance specification and features to meet the user expectation. It involves what is

  • 6

    known as "software programming" which is building a software tool or application using

    programming languages. It could either use "object oriented" programming languages like

    C++,Java, Linux or "assembly level" like microprocessor 8085/86, or even "hardware

    development" language like VHDL. And there are different methods of system

    development each using different tools to accomplish the same task ( examples - object

    oriented, rapid prototyping, waterfall etc.) Dorsey (2005) Stepanek. (2012)

    Project management as Schawalbe (2011) describes it is " the application of knowledge,

    skills, tools and techniques to project activities to meet project requirements." The project

    manager along with the project team must make every effort to meet the specific scope,

    time, cost, quality and goals of projects while facilitating the entire process to meet needs,

    the wants and the expectations of the customer. Software Project Management as the term

    suggests deals with management of every stage of the development cycle and the proper

    management of the people involved, or its stakeholders Mc Leod (2011). They include the

    project sponsor, project manager, client, client team, solution architect, consultants, sub-

    contractor. A example of a IT project roadmap is shown in the figure 1 and the

    stakeholders that are involved in an IT project are shown in figure 2.

    Figure 10: Example of a IT Project Roadmap, Source - Kothari (2010)

    Figure 2 : Stakeholders in a IT project Source - Kothari (2010)

  • 7

    3.1 Why is Software Development Different

    In order to better understand why software projects fail we first need to understand what

    makes Software Projects so different from other kinds of projects. Stepanek. (2012) an

    experienced team leader and software developer describes how complexity, conceptuality,

    frequent technological changes that are inevitable ( For example, Java 6 a programming

    language, had 81 updates, each differing significantly) which results in the lack of

    developer's expertise in the new technology, lack of proven best practices. These factors

    along with some others make software development unique and different from other

    projects. To explain it in a lucid way he tells us that software development is not just a

    method to build software but also a process of learning how to build the software that is

    best suited for its function. No software is perfect as first envisioned it will always require

    changes, to make it more suitable to its role.

    3.2 IT Project Success Rate Trends

    Kraft (2008) observe that on a average 66 % IT project fail, with 52 % project being

    cancelled and 82 % being delivered late. These stats might look shocking given the fact

    that companies invest huge amount of money on IT projects. In order to validate this data

    we explored a few other reports and came across the Standish Group Report Rubenstein

    (2007), that says in 2007, 35 % of software projects started in 2006 were completed

    successfully compared to 16% in 1994, which was a significant improvement Cerpa and

    Verner (2009).

    Figure 3: IT Project Success Rate, Source - Chaos Research 2012 Standish (2013)

  • 8

    The latest report "Chaos Manifesto 2013" by the same group suggest that it has further

    improved to about 39% as shown in Figure 3, indicating that the industry is responding

    well to the situation Standish (2013). However, the fact that still around 60% are either

    unsuccessful or had cost and schedule overruns or dint deliver the required features means

    there is much more to be done. Figure 4 illustrates the percentages of time, cost overruns

    and features for the period - 2004 to 2012. As shown there has been an increase in time and

    cost overruns since 2010 ( 71 to 74%). Although, percentage of projects failing to meet the

    "features" that is nothing but the specified functional requirements has gone down a bit to

    69%, but is still higher than during the period from 2004 to 2008. These stats are very high

    and is a reason for concern in many organizations in the world as lot of the company's

    resources like people, time, money, hardware and software can be saved as stated by Purna

    Sudhakar (2012).

    Figure 4 : IT Project Overruns and Features, Source - Chaos Research 2012 Standish (2013)

    3.3 Why Software Projects Fail

    "If there's more than one way to do a job and one of those ways will end in disaster, then

    somebody will do it that way." Murphys Law. The current scenario of IT projects sums

    up this statement. So Why do software project fail ? Let us look at some of the causes of

    project failure that we have explored in our paper.

    Existing literature on software projects failure point towards that failure are caused by the

    project environment, tasks, process and individuals Lehtinen, Mntyl et al. (2014). For the

    purpose of this research paper we broadly classify the reasons for failures into three

    categories which are people, organizational culture and process, and the lack of proper

    resources and technology which are discussed in detail in the following sections.

  • 9

    3.3.1 Effect of People

    (i) Lack of understanding between participants of a software project system

    Project coordination, collaboration and common understanding among the stakeholder is

    necessary for a project to be successful as portrayed by Imtiaz (2013). However this is

    sometimes what is lacking. This could be between users and developers or among the

    developers within a project team. The developers may have good technical knowledge but

    lack the business knowledge and on the other hand users lack the technical understanding.

    What results is a difference in expectations. The developers might perceive certain aspects

    to be important and may enhance or add new features, but these may not be useful or

    required by the customer. The aspects that are essential to their jobs might not be there.

    This in turn can make their jobs more complicated as it may require additional steps that

    are unnecessary making it "non-fit". In addition, many of the projects are outsourced to

    companies in different countries, and hence factors like geographical distance, cultural

    differences and languages (at a communication level) add to lack of understanding between

    participants.

    (ii) Lack of User Involvement

    User involvement is another aspect that needs to be present throughout the project

    development cycle. Most of the time the user involvement will be good at the start of the

    project but at this stage all systems requirements that are needed to make it a complete fit

    for the purpose cannot be well understood. Majid, Noor et al. (2010) had carried out a

    research in this regard and found that software professionals tend not to include the end

    users in the technical meetings which then results in the not involvement of users in

    formulating the type of software used. This is why in many cases we see that user

    satisfaction is not met.

    (iii) Lack of people with the required technical skills

    Technical as well as business and soft skills of the team members and the project manager

    plays a crucial role in success of software projects as validated by Mc Leod (2011). Earlier

    while differentiating from software project from other projects we learnt that software

    technology keeps undergoing changes. This leads to lack of knowledge of new platforms.

    The team members need to adapt to the changes quickly or need to be trained as per the

    latest tools or versions required for the project. It becomes even more important for the

    project manager to have solid knowledge of the platforms, software version and programs

  • 10

    to better guide the team. In addition to this, he must also have the ability to lead, negotiate,

    communicate, assess his teams capabilities and be able to reorganize and solve problems

    quickly and effectively. Jiang (2007) in their paper discusses how these aspects effect the

    performance of software projects. In his research he establishes how Information Systems

    (IS) personal skills and project performance is to some extent mediated by organizational

    technology learning. Hence skill set of the people involved in development is a critical

    factor for software project success.

    3.3.2 Effect of Organizational Culture and Process

    (i) Lack of Project Selection and Insufficient Planning

    Planning is the foremost step in an IT project. It refers to the process of deciding in

    advance what to do, where to do and with what resources. It is at this stage that cost

    estimates, team size and composition, the customer requirement, project assumptions and

    other resource planning activities pertaining to the IT environment and systems are

    established. It is also in this stage where "Software Requirement Specification" or SRS is

    defined. This is a basic component of any software development project and when not well

    defined can cause misunderstandings. Imprecise or an unconvincing business case might

    lead to lack of proper approvals which in turn leads poor estimation and causes project

    failure.

    (ii) Lack of Top Management Support and Commitment

    The entrepreneur in the company is the one who makes the strategic decision and thus it

    goes without saying he plays the most important role in terms of the 'decision context'. All

    studies done so far point towards this attribute as a critical success factor. The management

    need to be aware upfront or be visibly and vocally behind a project. In some cases a strong

    backup from top management can turn things around for projects that are going badly or is

    going through a bad implementation phase. Commitment is another aspect that is

    important. At times change of management occurs in the client company. The new

    manager might not understand the initial project scope and might not have the complete

    knowledge of processes involved and sometimes may withheld approvals. He may not

    want to pursue the project in the current manner for a variety of reasons as elucidated by

    Imtiaz (2013). Also the project team might not be able to easily communicate and convince

    the new manager. This leads to project failure.

  • 11

    (iv) Project scope or scope creep is managed poorly

    Not all projects that are cancelled can be termed as failure. For example, some projects

    though well managed gets cancelled because of the expediency of original purpose ceases

    and can be no longer applicable Jrgensen (2014). In some of these cases, what happens is

    that the project scope is extended beyond the initial requirement also known as "scope

    creep" in order to meet the new objectives. This uncontrolled changes that keep occurring

    during the project life cycle leads to project failure.

    (v) Deadlines and project goals are unrealistic

    It has been researched that there is close relation between the expectations or project goals

    and pressure caused by deadlines and the skills set of the team. At times, project leads

    neglect to understand that it's not practically possible to cover all aspects of the project

    within the stipulated time frame. Even over estimating the capabilities and skills of team

    members add on to this. This may be due to lack of experience of the project lead in

    properly analysing the situation. All these factors put together, lead to not meeting the

    desired objectives within the stipulated time frame.

    (vi) Absence or Bad Risk Management

    This one aspect that has not be adhered to sufficiently enough even in the latest context of

    new agile methodologies being adopted by companies for software project success. Not

    giving due attention to risk management can cause projects to fail. Risks are unplanned

    events that can occur at any stage of the SDLC cycle. These may include workforce issues

    and financial conditions on both the clients either or the developers side. These

    unprecedented events include global recession, natural calamities in either ones location,

    high dependence on certain project team members and their unavailability, certain failures

    of technical platforms etc. Some of these can't be predicted but there many management

    process like the predictive risk analysis for example that can be used tackle the threats of

    these risks. In his paper de Bakker, Boonstra et al. (2012) discusses how risk management

    can be approached with regard to the IT Industry in particular.

    3.3.3 Effect of Lack of Resources and Appropriate Technological Platforms

    Insufficient allotment or Poor estimation where initially itself project receives fewer

    resources than that would be required for carrying out the planned activities is one of the

    main causes of project failure. These resources could be in terms of people with

  • 12

    appropriate skill set, appropriate technological platforms needed and the availability of

    financial resources. Many times projects goes wrong because wrong and inappropriate

    technology choices. A project may receive the right resources but if managed poorly leads

    to wastage and requirement of additional resources. Imtiaz (2013) points out that

    availability of these resources- financial, people and technology are dependent on the Top

    Management support discussed earlier.

    3.4 Defining IT Project Success

    Figure 4: Defining IT Project Success, Source - 2013 IT Project Success Rate Survey Scott W. (2013)

    The above figure illustrates what IT professionals consider a successful project based on

    survey carried out in 2013 by Scott W. (2013) . Majority felt completing project on time

    was the most important determinant for defining project success, were as 36 % believed it

    was to be within budget constraints and 14% felt it was to meet the desired specifications.

    Agarwal (2006) in their research found that most of the stakeholders of IT project

    management team consider 'scope' of the software project as the most important criteria for

    defining success. Scope includes the functionality and quality of project outcome.

    Schawalbe (2011) in her book gives a more inclusive definition of IT project success,

    saying if it met scope, time, cost goals, satisfied customer or the sponsor.

  • 13

    3.4.1 Critical Factors of IT Project Success

    From the above discussion on what constitutes a successful IT project and after

    understanding the causes of IT project failure the paper find these factors to be most

    important for IT project success. Most of these factors were explained in section 3.3 and

    supported by research carried out by Imtiaz (2013) .

    (i) Proper Planning and Estimation

    (ii) Avoiding Scope Creep

    (iii) Top management support

    (iv) Well Qualified Project team and Project Manager

    (iv) Clear Goals

    (v) Effective monitoring and control

    (vi) Customer or User Involvement throughout the SDLC

    (vii) Proper Risk Management

    In order to have greater IT Project Success rate firms need to adopt "agile" practices that

    cover the entire SDLC. This is discussed briefly in the following section.

    3.4.2 Use of new Agile Software Engineering Methods to achieve Project Success

    The emergence of agile software engineering methods as compared to conventional

    methods have improved the overall efficiency in software development Chow and Cao

    (2008). Agile methods give greater flexibility and responsiveness in environment of

    constant change. Some of the agile methods used in the software industry are Crystal,

    Extreme Programming (XP), Scrum, Feature driven development (FDD), Dynamic System

    Development Method (DSDM), Adaptive Software development (ASD), and Lean

    Software Development (LD) and Joint Application Design (JAD) Koch (2005). The book

    explains how adopting these new practices helps in improving the overall project

    performance. For example XP's pair programming concept programmers can learn from

    each other and monitor each other's progress. It includes the simple designing methods that

    help in keeping the complexity of the software within the skill level of the whole team.

  • 14

    4. Discussion

    In today's world, no field is without software programmes and systems. To work

    effectively one must be able to articulate one's needs to the Software developer in order to

    get a system that best works in the business environment. In order to do this the IT user

    must be able to "speak the IT language". As we have seen that all is not well with Software

    Project Management with success rate currently being a mere 40 %. Hence I do agree with

    factors discussed which are quite valid especially with regard to the software industry.

    But there is another side to it. The definition of IT project success with regard to the time -

    budget requirement is usually decided by the vendor or supplier. There needs to be a

    stakeholders perspective while defining success as well. Also the fact that most of the time,

    the budget and timelines are set at the start when uncertainty is at its maximum it is

    practically impossible to define the project success criteria at that stage. In addition as we

    have seen in section 3.1 how software development is unique in its own way and have

    constant technological changes that are inevitable, along with the fact that all techniques

    need not work with specific types of project I feel that there are more things that need to be

    considered in terms of the definition of IT project success. Hence the statement found in

    Attarzadeh (2008) is valid.

    5. Recommendations

    All is not lost for IT projects. I feel there are certain things that need to be set right, some

    of which are quite basic in nature with regard to project management, this along with best

    practices followed by leading firms could enhance the project success rate. Some of the

    key recommendations that I would like to propose in order to have IT project success in the

    future based on the research carried out are discussed below.

    (i) Team Motivation and Collaborative Atmosphere plays a critical role in project

    success. Higher the motivation greater will be the overall output. I find this the single most

    important factor especially considering the fact that there is a lot of pressure when it comes

    to software projects. People get disgruntled fast especially when things don't go right.

    Sometimes they even leave their jobs in middle of the project. How well the project lead

    can motivate the team when the chips are down, when there are disagreements or when

    deadlines are approaching close, more the chances of the project succeeding. I would also

    like to includes aspects such as user involvement, and better understanding between all

  • 15

    stakeholders, discussed in section 3.3.1 under this point. There needs to be an overall

    collaborative atmosphere among team members, internal and external stakeholders,

    solution architects, client team and the executive sponsor.

    (ii) Manager should use Best Practices and Lessons Learned

    In order minimize or avoid the nastiest scope creep, a project manger should contemplate

    even minor changes to the initial project scope cautiously and rework the course of events ,

    provide new estimates and communicate it with all the stakeholders before incorporating

    the changes. Jones (2010) discusses about fifty best practices used by highly successful

    software project companies like Microsoft, IBM, Sony and EDS. The author explores how

    these practices can ensure success in the field of software engineering. One practice for

    example is instilling a process of continuous improvement while modelling the software

    development process which can have a good impact on the performance of future projects.

    (iii) Use of Agile Methods

    I believe the use of latest Agile methods can be very effective technique and can turn

    things around for IT projects. It covers all aspects of the SDLC right from planning to

    delivery in a very unique and effective way. Many of the methodologies discussed in

    section 3.4.2 are not yet being followed on a large scale and more the companies use them

    better will be the end results. However there is much more to be done with regard to use of

    agile methods to mitigate risk.

    6. Conclusion

    Summary: This paper investigated the prime factors that affects software project success.

    The study was carried out in order to understand why there is such a low success rate for

    IT projects compared to other projects.

    Findings : We found that currently the project success rate of IT projects is around 40

    percent section 3.1 that is quite low compared to other kinds of projects and causes huge

    losses to companies. Nevertheless, in our study, we also found that the industry is

    responding well by incorporating new and agile methods that has helped in improving the

    success rate over the last decade. In addition we found that Project Managers play an

    important role. They need to inculcate a habit of using best practices and have a continuous

    learning mentality that can help the entire team in meeting the project deliverables.

  • 16

    Limitation : We limited the scope of this study to projects pertaining to the Information

    Technology sector or the software projects and its success criteria. We did not explore the

    affects, IT projects have on other management aspects of an organization, such as sales or

    marketing. Also our paper does not look into specific IT projects where additional

    determinants needs to be considered in defining "success". Further research needs to be

    carried out for analysing and understanding these factors in a more comprehensive way.

    7. Reflection

    Coming from a Telecomm management background there were many things I could

    connect with in terms of project management, but nonetheless the learning curve was a

    steep one for me as it had a lot to do with software projects in particular. In order to find

    the criteria for success and failure, I had to start from square one, which was understanding

    the fundamentals of IT Project Management and how IT Project Management differ from

    other kinds of projects. The next challenge was to understand the way IT projects are done

    in the real world, the processes, tools and techniques. Only then could I move towards

    critical analysis of the project cycle and its pitfalls. There are two books I liked in

    particular and would like to mention. One was Schawalbe (2011) and the other Stepanek.

    (2012) which helped me understand information technology projects in a better way. From

    the research, I learnt that a Project Manager plays a crucial role in building the team and

    delivering a successful system. He needs to have experience, good technical and analytical

    skills along with exceptional soft skills that are needed to bring the team together and get

    the best from each team member. I also learnt a few things about the latest technological

    and statistical methods that are used in better analysing the pitfalls in software

    development and how they improve the process in order to achieve greater success.

  • 17

    8. References

    Agarwal, N., Rathod,Urvashi (2006). "Defining 'success' for software projects : An Explanatory reveleation." International Journal of Project Management(24): 358-370. Attarzadeh, I., Hock,Siew (2008). "Project Management Practices: The Criteria for Success or Failure " Communications of the IBIMA: 234-241. Cerpa, N. and J. M. Verner (2009). "Why did your project fail?" Communications of the ACM 52(12): 130-134. Chow, T. and D.-B. Cao (2008). "A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects." Journal of Systems and Software 81(6): 961-971. de Bakker, K., A. Boonstra and H. Wortmann (2012). "Risk managements' communicative effects influencing IT project success." International Journal of Project Management 30(4): 444-457. Dorsey, P., Dr., (2005) "Top 10 reasons why systems project fail." Imtiaz, A., Md.,Al-Mudhary,S.,Abduljalil,Mirashemi,Taha.Md.,Ibrahim,Roslina (2013). "Critical Success factors of Information Technology Projects." International Jornal of Social,Management,Economics and Business Engineering 7(12): 1879-1874. Jiang, J., Klein,Gary,Beck,Phil,Wang,G.,T.,Eric (2007). "Lack of Skills Risks to Organizational Technology Learning and software Project performance." Information Resources Management Journal 20(3): 32-44. Jones, C. (2010). Software Engineering Best Practices. New York, NY, USA McGraw-Hill, Inc. . Jrgensen, M. (2014). "Failure factors of small software projects at a global outsourcing marketplace." Journal of Systems and Software 92(0): 157-169. Kanaracus., C. (2012). The scariest software project horror stories of 2012 - Billions of dollars were wasted and tempers ran hot as multiple projects hit the skids this year. IDG News Service. Kelkar, A., S., (2013). Software project management - a concise study. Delhi, PHI Learning Private Ltd. Koch, S., Allan (2005). Agile Software Development: Evaluating the Methods for Your Organizations. Norwood,MA 02062, Artech House. Kothari, D., Mitchell,Romeo (2010). Baselining the Schedule. NASA Project Management Challenge 2010. Kraft, T. (2008). Systematic and holistic IT Project Management approach for commercial software with case studies. 3311415 D.M.I.T., Lawrence Technological University. Lehtinen, T. O. A., M. V. Mntyl, J. Vanhanen, J. Itkonen and C. Lassenius (2014). "Perceived causes of software project failures An analysis of their relationships." Information and Software Technology 56(6): 623-643. Majid, R. A., N. L. M. Noor, W. A. W. Adnan and S. Mansor (2010). A survey on user involvement in software Development Life Cycle from practitioner's perspectives. Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT), 2010 5th International Conference on. Mc Leod, L., MacDonell,G.,S., (2011). "Factors that Effect Software Systems Development Project Outcomes - A Survey of Research " ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 43(4): 24. Purna Sudhakar, G. (2012). "A model of critical success factors for software projects." Journal of Enterprise Information Management 25(6): 537-558. Rubenstein, D., D. (2007). Standish Group Report: There's Less Development Chaos Today. Standish Group Report. Schawalbe, K. (2011). Managing Information Technology Projects, Course Technology, Cengage Learning. Scott W., A. (2013) "2013 IT Project Success Rates Survey Results." Ambysoft. Standish, G. (2013). The Chaos Manifesto 2013 - think big,act small: 1-52. Stepanek., G. (2012). Software Project Secrets - Why Software Projects Fail, apress.