CRISPR: what it is, and why it is having a profound impact on human health
-
Upload
pistoia-alliance -
Category
Science
-
view
128 -
download
3
Transcript of CRISPR: what it is, and why it is having a profound impact on human health
November 16, 2016
CRISPR: what it is, and why it is having a profound impact on
human health A Pistoia Alliance Debates Webinar
Chaired by Alvis Brazma – EMBL-EBI
This webinar is being recorded
Poll Question 1: How would you rate your
personal knowledge of CRISPR?
A. I’m an expert
B. I have used CRISPR
C. I’ve heard of it
D. I know next to nothing about it
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 4
The Panel
Patrick Harrison, Senior Lecturer Physiology, University College of CorkThe focus of Dr Harrison’s lab is the development gene editing for treatment of rare diseases. His early work in this field pioneered the use of ZFNs and CRISPR to successfully repair the most common CF-causing mutation, F508del, in cell culture. The current focus extends the work to correct CF mutations of the deep intron theratype in primary cells, stem cells and animal models. Dr. Harrison is a principal investigator in the CF Trust’s Gene Editing Strategic Research Centre, and has additional grant funding from the CF Foundation (USA), with collaborations across Europe, USA and New Zealand. He is also using CRISPR editing to model skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis and Epidermolysis Bullosa.
Alvis Brazma, Senior Team Leader of Functional Genomics, EMBL-EBIDr Alvis Brazma is a Senior Scientist at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) and leading a group on gene expression at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI). He studied mathematics at the University of Latvia, Riga, before obtaining his PhD in computer science from the Moscow State University. In 1997 he joined the EMBL and in 1999 was among the first scientists to use microarray data to study gene regulation. In 1999 he founded the Microarray Gene Expression Data society and started a microarray database ArrayExpress. Now he is in charge of several major EBI resources, including ArrayExpress, Expression Atlas, and BioStudies database. He is co-leading the working group on data integration for Pan-cancer Whole Genome project of the International Cancer Genome Consortium.
Mike Ollmann, Principal Scientist, AmgenDr. Ollmann’s work focuses on use of somatic cell genetics techniques, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi, for early stage drug discovery. Dr. Ollmann obtained his Ph.D. in Genetics with Dr. Greg Barsh at Stanford University, prior to joining Exelixis Inc., where his work included early use of RNAi in Drosophila and mammalian cells for target identification and validation. He joined Amgen in 2011 and is a Principal Scientist in the Genome Analysis Unit based in South San Francisco.
Anna Middleton, Head of Society & Ethics Research Wellcome Genome Campus
November 16, 2016
Dr Anna Middleton is a social scientist, continually asking ‘how are people responding to genomics?’ Her PhD is in psychology and she is also a trained genetic counsellor, having worked in the NHS for 10 years with patients exploring the impact of genetics on themselves and their families. She runs the Society and Ethics Research Group at the Wellcome Genome Campus in Cambridge and delivers research that explore the social and ethical impact of new genomic technologies.
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 5
Agenda
• CRISPR – Cas9 Gene Editing(PH)• Accelerating science (MO)• The informatics challenge (AB)• Cystic Fibrosis - the case for gene-editing (PH)• Ethics and CRISPR (slides from AM; presented
by PH)
5November 16, 2016
CRISPR – Cas9 Gene EditingWhy How What
Patrick Harrison, PhD – University College Cork, Ireland
7CRISPR
Val His Leu Thr Pro Glu Glu Lys Ser Asp
November 16, 2016
8CRISPR
Val His Leu Thr Pro Val Glu Lys Ser AspTarget DNA
November 16, 2016
9CRISPR
Thr Pro Glu Glu Lys
Val His Leu Thr Pro Val Glu Lys Ser AspTarget DNA
Donor DNA
November 16, 2016
10CRISPR
Target DNA
Donor DNA
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
Cas9
guide RNA
November 16, 2016
11CRISPR
Target DNA
Donor DNA
Cas9
guide RNA
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
12CRISPR
Target DNA
Donor DNA
Cas9
guide RNA
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
13CRISPR
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
14CRISPR
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
15CRISPR
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
16CRISPR
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
17CRISPR
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
November 16, 2016
18CRISPR
Thr Pro Glu Glu Lys
Val His Leu Thr Pro Glu Glu Lys Ser Asp
Cut Resect Incorporate Seal Precision Repair
HDRHomology-directed repair
November 16, 2016
19CRISPR
Target DNA
Cas9
guide RNA
November 16, 2016
20CRISPRNovember 16, 2016
21CRISPRNovember 16, 2016
CRISPR
Val His Leu Thr Pro Gly Glu Val STOP
NHEJNon-homologous
end joining
In-frame STOP codon = gene knock-out
November 16, 2016 22
CRISPR
Cas9(2013)
gRNA
Why has Cas9/gRNA surpassed ZFNs and TALENs?
ZFNs(1996)
TALENs(2011)
Standing on the shoulders of giants
November 16, 2016 23
24CRISPR
Cas9/guideRNADesign and synthesis (2013)
November 16, 2016
25CRISPR
|||||||||||||||||||| 5’ GUCACCUCCAAUCAGUAGGG 3'
gRNA
Cas9/guideRNADesign and synthesis (2013)
November 16, 2016
26CRISPR
|||||||||||||||||||| 5’ GUCACCUCCAAUCAGUAGGGGUUUUAGAGCUAG .|||||. |||| GUUCAACUAUUGCCUGAUCGGAAUAAAAUU CGAUA |||| GAA AAAGUGGCACCGA .|||||||G 3’ UUUUUUCGUGGCU
AA
AA
gRNA
Cas9/guideRNADesign and synthesis (2013)
November 16, 2016
27CRISPR
|||||||||||||||||||| 5’ GUCACCUCCAAUCAGUAGGGGUUUUAGAGCUAG .|||||. |||| GUUCAACUAUUGCCUGAUCGGAAUAAAAUU CGAUA |||| GAA AAAGUGGCACCGA .|||||||G 3’ UUUUUUCGUGGCU
AA
AA
Cas9
DSB
gRNA
Cas9/guideRNADesign and synthesis (2013)
November 16, 2016
28CRISPR
Double Stranded BreakTwo options
NHEJ• High efficiency KO• All cell types• KO in any animal• Clinical Editing
HDR• Low efficiency Precision
Repair• Dividing cells only • Multiple corrections in vivo
November 16, 2016
29CRISPR
GFP transgenic
rat
~40% Knock Outs
CRISPR 2016
MiceRatsCowsSheepRabbits
MonkeysZebrafish
Human Embryos (14-day limit)
Transfer KO eggsto surrogatePronuclei
Germline EditingInject Nuclease into Fertilised Eggs
Yang 2009
November 16, 2016
30CRISPR
F.IX genevariant 1 2 3 4
Pre-clinical in vivo editing – haemophilia Bi.v. inject nuclease and donor
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
31CRISPR
F.IX genevariant 1 2 3 4
Pre-clinical in vivo editing – haemophilia Bi.v. inject nuclease and donor
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
32CRISPR
F.IX genevariant 1 2 3 4
Pre-clinical in vivo editing – haemophilia Bi.v. inject nuclease and donor
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
33CRISPR
F.IX genevariant
Super-exon Donor
1 2 3 4
2 3 4
F.IX genewild-type
1 2 3 42 3 4
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
34CRISPR
Gene Editing = Permanent
cDNA addition = Transient
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
35CRISPR
Gene Editing = Permanent
cDNA addition = Transient
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
36CRISPR
Gene Editing = Permanent
cDNA addition = Transient
Li 2011
Li 2011
November 16, 2016
37CRISPR
100 to 1,000-fold reduction in viral load
Control
Tebas 2014
Patient #1ZFNs delete CCR5
November 16, 2016
38CRISPR
Acute Lymphoid Leukaemia
Modified Patient T cells
CAR targets CD19
TALENs delete TCR (avoids rejection)
2015 Patient #2TALENs enable CAR-T cells
November 16, 2016
39CRISPR
CRISPR – Cas9 Gene EditingInterim Summary
• Cas9/gRNA creates DNA breaks
• HDR – precision repair @ low efficiency
• NHEJ – targeted deletions @ high efficiency
• Gene-edited cells already used in patients
• CRISPR clinical trials – 2017/18?
November 16, 2016
Poll Question 2: Does your company have
an active CRISPR research/informatics
effort underway?
A. Actively using CRISPR
B. Exploring use of CRISPR
C. Not currently using CRISPR
D. I don’t know
Accelerating science
Mike Ollmann - Amgen
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 42
Drug Discovery at Amgen Target discovery & validation driven by human genetics
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 43
Gene Knockout & Editing by CRISPR/Cas9
Figure from ThermoFisher
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR
Rapid Gene Knockout by Delivery of Cas9/sgRNA Ribonucleoprotein complex
Liang et al, J Biotech, 2015
102 103 104 105
200
150
100
50
Flow cytometry to quantify target protein levels 4 days after
electroporation of Cas9/sgRNA complex
Control cells - no sgRNACells+Cas9/target sgRNA
Target protein expression levelCe
ll co
unt
November 16, 2016 44
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 45
Rapid Gene Knockout by Delivery of Cas9/sgRNA Ribonucleoprotein complex
Not-so-rapid clonal isolation of edited cells
Ran et al, Nature Protocols, 2013Liang et al, J Biotech, 2015
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR
Pooled Lentiviral sgRNA Libraries for Genome-scale Gene Knockout Screening
Figure adapted from Hartenian & Doench, FEBS, 2015
November 16, 2016 46
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
Beyond Gene Knockout: Alternative Cas9-mediated Screening Methods
Sanjana, Analytical Biochem., 2016
47November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Poll Question 3: Which is more important to
your research?
A. Precision editing by homology-directed
recombination (HDR)
B. Targeted knock-out/deletion by non-
homologous end-joining (NHEJ)
C. Don’t use CRISPR
The informatics challengeFrom predicting the target sites to assessing the effects
Alvis Brazma – EMBL-EBI
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 50
Why bioinformatics?
• Doing things in silico saves time and resources • Some examples of what can be done
– Finding the target – a gene or locus of interest in the genome
– Finding where to cut the genome near the target
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 51
Cas9 nuclease is guided to the genome position by 20 nt short guide RNA (sgRNA) sequence
From Sander & Joung, Nature Biotech. 32, 247
The guide sequence
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 52
Selecting the sgRNA sequence
Genome
Gene of interest
20 nt sequence
Most similar sequence off target
Target sequence - perfect match
Most similar sequence off target
TCC
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 53
Selecting the sgRNA sequence
Genome
Gene of interest
20 nt sequence
Most similar sequence off target
Most similar sequence off target
Target sequence - perfect match
TCC TCC
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
54CRISPR
Annotated CRISPR/Cas9 target sites in Ensembl genome browser at European Bioinformatics Institute
Anna Farne, Mark Thomas, David Parry-Smith
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 54November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 55
What can bioinformatics do for CRISPR?
• Tools for predicting and assessing the short guide RNA (sgRNA)– Purely sequence based
methods – Methods utilizing the
growing experimental evidence
• Collecting the successes and failures of sgRNA sequences
• Using machine learning to interpolate these
• Tools for assessing and interpreting the editing results– Using and analyzing
direct effects based on RNA sequencing
– Assessing further downstream effects, such as systematic gene knockouts in cell lines
November 16, 2016
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
56CRISPR
CRISPR activities at EMBL-EBI in collaboration with the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
• Computational annotation of sgRNA binding sites
• (Planned) Curated database of experimental results– Experimentally validated sgRNA binding sites– Knockout screen results
• Gene essentiality in various cell lines
November 16, 2016
Cystic FibrosisThe Case for Gene Editing
Patrick Harrison, Ph.D. – University College Cork, Ireland
58November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Cl-Cl-
HCO3-
HCO3-
Airway hydrationNeutral pH
Normal LungCFTR anion channel
Cilia beating
H2O H2O
59November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Cilia beating
CF LungMutations in CFTR gene
collapsed
Cl-Cl-
HCO3-
HCO3-
H2O H2O
Cilia collapsed
60November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Class IIINo conductance
Class IIReduced Trafficking
Class INo protein
CF – Personalised Medicine
4,000 people 92,000 people 4,000 people
61November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Abs
olut
e ch
ange
in %
of
pre
dict
ed F
EV1
Ramsay 2011
Nick Talbot
Class IIINo conductance
4,000 people
62November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Abs
olut
e ch
ange
in %
of
pre
dict
ed F
EV1
.
Wainwright 2015
Orkambi (dose A)
Orkambi (dose B)
Placebo
BA
Class IIReduced Trafficking
92,000 people
63November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Abs
olut
e ch
ange
in %
of
pre
dict
ed F
EV1
cDNA
Placebo
Alton 2015
Multi-dose CFTR cDNA is safe
Class INo protein
4,000 people
64CRISPR
Genome F508del5'3'
3’5'
Donor CTT 3'5'
5'3'
CTT GAA
------
Lee 2012
November 16, 2016
65CRISPR
Genome F508del5'3'
3’5'
Donor CTT 3'5'
5'3'
CTT GAA
------
Lee 2012
November 16, 2016
66CRISPR
Genome F508del5'3'
3’5'
NGG
Donor CTT 3'5'
5'3'
CTT GAA
------
Schwank 2013
November 16, 2016
67CRISPR
5'3'
3’5'
3'5'
5'3'
CTT GAA
Genome F508del
Donor CTT
November 16, 2016
68CRISPR
5'3'
3’5'
3'5'
5'3'
GAA
CTT
Genome F508del
Donor CTT
November 16, 2016
69CRISPR
5'3'
3’5'
3'5'
5'3'
GAA
CTT
Genome F508del
Donor CTT
November 16, 2016
70CRISPR
5'3'
3’5'
3'5'
5'3'
GAA
CTT
CTT
Genome F508del
Donor CTT
November 16, 2016
71CRISPR
5'3'
3’5'
3'5'
5'3'
GAA
CTT
CTTGAA
CTT
Genome F508del
Donor CTT
November 16, 2016
72
Editing restores function Stem Cell Organoids
WT F508del F508del edited
November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Schwank 201372
73
WT F508del F508del edited
Editing restores function Stem Cell Organoids
November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Schwank 201373
74
WT F508del F508del edited
Editing restores function Stem Cell Organoids
November 16, 2016 CRISPR
Schwank 201374
75
Schwank 2013
WT F508del F508del edited
Editing restores function Stem Cell Organoids
November 16, 2016 CRISPR
75
76CRISPR
HDRrestores
CFTR<1%
Select & enrich
NHEJ >50%KO
How can KO fix CF?
76
November 16, 2016
77CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
CRISPR KO – 40% of Class I (and IV) mutationsDeep intron Mutations
3272 -26A>G(n = 463)
3849 +10kb C>T(n = 1,143)
* * *1811+1.6kb A>G
(n = 71)
77
November 16, 2016
78CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
3849 +10kb C>T(n = 1,143)
*
WT GTEx 22 AG GC AG Ex 23
November 16, 2016
79CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
3849 +10kb C>T(n = 1,143)
*
WT GTEx 22 AG GT AG Ex 23
79
November 16, 2016
80CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
3849 +10kb C>T(n = 1,143)
*
WT GTEx 22 AG GT AG Ex 23pseudo Exon
TAA
80
November 16, 2016
81CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
3849 +10kb C>T(n = 1,143)
*
GWT GTEx 22 GT AG Ex 23pseudo Exon
TAA
Delete 25 to 150 bp
3849 +10kb C>T(n = 1,143)
A
81
November 16, 2016
82CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 2724 25
3’5'
WT GTEx 22 AG Ex 23
82
November 16, 2016
83November 16, 2016 CRISPR
One for AllCFTR super-exons
83
84CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
84
November 16, 2016
85CRISPR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
Bednarski 2016
CFTR Exons 11-27
85
November 16, 2016
86CRISPR
CFTR Exons 11-27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
Bednarski 201686
November 16, 2016
87CRISPR
CFTR Exons 11-27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
3’5'
Bednarski 201687
November 16, 2016
88
CFTR Exons 11-27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
5'
CFTR Exons 11-27CFTR Exons 11-27
3’
Bednarski 201688
November 16, 2016 CRISPR
89
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 2722 24 25
5' CFTR Exons 11-27
CFTR Exons 11-27
CFTR Exons 11-27
AAAA
3’
Unedited
Super-exon
Bednarski 2016
November 16, 2016 CRISPR
89
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 90
Cystic Fibrosis – Cas9 Gene EditingInterim Summary
• HDR – precise but inefficient
• NHEJ – efficient but only 2% of individuals
• HDR superexon – all mutations but inefficient
• NHEJ superexon – TBC
Cystic FibrosisThe Case for Gene Editing
Patrick Harrison, Ph.D. – University College Cork, Ireland
Ethics and CRISPRDr Anna Middleton
Head of Society and Ethics ResearchWellcome Genome Campus
Cambridge, UK
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 92
The most discussed ethics…• The most controversial aspect of CRISPR is the
potential use in editing gametes or embryos
• It is illegal to edit a human embryo with the aim of implanting it to achieve a pregnancy
• However, it is acceptable (e.g. in the UK, under license) to do research using CRISPR on embryos up to 14 days of age
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 93
Public Debate pivotal• Public debate about ‘designer babies’, eugenics
and the ‘slippery slope’ in the application of genetic technology has been happening for the last 40 years
• However, now is the time to consider, what is socially acceptable in terms of research on embryos
• If parents consent for research to happen on their discarded ’IVF’ embryos (that will never result in a pregnancy), does this mean it is socially acceptable to do?
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 94
The Debate so far…• Should all research on embryos be banned?• We live in a society where research on embryos
up to the 14 day point is acceptable (and is being done)
• CRISPR research should form part of this picture• If there is a moratorium on editing embryos in a
research setting, this will push the research underground and out of public scrutiny
• Research needs to be publicly funded on editing, in order to maintain safe regulation
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 95
Help the debate…• There are concerns that ethical debates about
embryo editing will negatively affect research on somatic cells
• we mustn’t let discussion about embryos dominate the public debate
• We need to avoid the unhelpful ‘slippery slope’ arguments and consider the evolution of editing on a case by case basis
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 96
Policy is on its way…• A policy statement from the American Society of
Human Genetics on ‘Germline Gene Editing’ will be issued shortly – has contribution from British, Canadian and USA genetic counsellors
November 16, 2016 CRISPR 97
Audience Q&APlease use the Question function in GoToWebinar
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
Other CRISPR events and resources
• Pistoia Alliance member Benchling is hosting a panel discussion: Engineering the Future: Opportunities and Applications of CRISPRWednesday November 30th 5:30-7:30pm PSTRock Health, 455 Mission Bay Boulevard, South #124, San Francisco, CA 94158 (more information at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/engineering-the-future-opportunities-and-applications-of-crispr-tickets-28795197210):
• Pistoia Alliance member Merck KGaA (Millipore Sigma/SigmaAldrich) has series of technical webinars and other videos availablehttp://www.sigmaaldrich.com/video/life-science/crispr-webinars.html
• Others?
Partner logo if required
© P
isto
ia A
llian
ce
CRISPR 100
To address question posed by attendee re: tools
November 16, 2016
• <Alvis Brazma> The two widely used tools for CRISPR/Cas9 design that I would recommend are:– GPP Web Portal at the Broad Institute -
http://portals.broadinstitute.org/gpp/public/analysis-tools/sgrna-design
– CRISPRseek Bioconductor packagehttp://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/CRISPRseek.html
• <Patrick Harrison> Recommended the following site for additional CRISPR resources:– https://www.addgene.org/crispr
IDMP: Overview and collaboration opportunities
The next Pistoia Alliance Discussion Webinar:
Moderator: Gerhard Noelken
Date: January 2017
check http://www.pistoiaalliance.org/events/ for the latest information
[email protected] @pistoiaalliance www.pistoiaalliance.org