People vs. Mariano | G.R. No. L-40527 | June 30, 1976 | Munoz PalmaFACTS:ISSUES/HELD:W/N civil courts and military commissions exercise concurrent jurisdiction over the offense of estafa of goods valued at not more than 6 thousand pesos and allegedly committed by a civilian NO RATIOMIRANDA vs. ARIZONA | 384 U.S. 436 | 1966 | WarrenAdmissibility of statements obtained from an individual who is subjected to custodial police interrogation and the necessity for procedures which assure that the individual is accorded due process. What did the police do? - Law enforcement officials took the defendant into custody and interrogated him in a police station for the purpose of obtaining a confession.-They did not advise him of his right to remain silent or of his right to consult with his attorney. - They confronted him with an alleged accomplice who accused him of having perpetrated a murder. He denied accusation, but the police handcuffed him and took him to an interrogation room. He stayed there for 4 hours until he confessed. - The police denied his request to speak to his attorney and they prevented his retained atty from consulting him.