Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

31
Title Layout SUBTITLE Crescent Pure: Case Analysis

Transcript of Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Page 1: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Title LayoutSUBTITLE

Crescent Pure:Case Analysis

Page 2: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Companies Involved

CRESCENTPURE

PDB

Page 3: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

01CEO : PETER HOOPER

02

03

MANUFACTURES OF NON ALCOHOLIC ORGANIC BEVERAGE

FOUNDED IN 2008

Crescent Pure

Page 4: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

01 CEO : MICHAEL BOOTHMARKETING VP : SARAH RYAN

02

03

MANUFACTURES OF ORGANIC JUICES AND SPARKLING WATER

LARGE PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

PORTLAND DRAKE BEVERAGES

Page 5: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

SITUATION ANALYSIS

• PDB acquired Crescent Pure in July 2013

Page 6: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

OBJECTIVEChoose a suitable brand positioning for Crescent Pure by analysing the

available data

Page 7: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis
Page 8: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Word with which consumers describe Energy or Sports drinks

Refreshing Healthy Affordable Functional Too sweet For teens Functional Natural Hydrating None0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Energy Drinks Sports Drinks

perc

enta

ge

Page 9: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Demographics of Crescent Online Customers

18-2425-3435-4445-5455+36%

15%

3% 2%

Age Range

44%

Page 10: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Add a Slide Title - 3INCOME: $42500

Page 11: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Demographics of Crescent Pure Consumers

Gender

Male41%

59%

Page 12: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Product Positioning Options

1. •Energy Drink

2. •Sports Drink

3. •Organic Drink

Page 13: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

• SPORTS DRINKS PERCEIVED AS HIGH HYDRATION AND LOW ENERGY DRINKS.

• ENERGY DRINKS PERCEIVED AS LOW HYDRATION AND HIGH ENERGY DRINKS.

PERCEPTUAL MAP

Page 14: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

• SPORTS DRINKS PERCEIVED AS HIGH NUTRITION AND GOOD TASTING DRINKS.

• ENERGY DRINKS PERCEIVED AS LOW NUTRITION AND GOOD TASTING DRINKS.

PERCEPTUAL MAP

Page 15: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

ENERGY DRINKS

Page 16: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Positioning as Energy drinkPROS CONS

• Fierce industry competition• Publics disapproval of new drink on the market• Potentially stricter government regulation• Consumption has lowered after negative media attention

• 42% consider them as “any time beverage”• Market growing at the rate of 40%• Price of Crescent pure ($2.75) will be less than industry average of $2.99

Page 17: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Sports Drinks

Page 18: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Positioning as Sports drinkPROS

CONS

• Health risks associated with them• Fierce competition• 85% of category revenue with big players• $2.75 price is higher then industry average

• Large expected market growth • Low caffeine content acts as point of Difference• Diet and low sugar sports drinks are growth areas in the industry

Page 19: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

ORGANIC DRINKS

Page 20: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Positioning as Organic drinkPROS CONS

• Large advertising budget required• Larger consumer base, thus, larger distribution channels needed.

• No competition from big firms• Premium pricing can be done, thus, large revenues• Attracts health conscious consumers

Page 21: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Hypothesis

Page 22: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Organic drinks market is very diverse and hence will require large advertising expenditure

Page 23: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Average price for 12 and 24 Oz can is $1 and $2 respectively. Thus this positioning will not be very lucrative.

Page 24: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Crescent should be positioned as healthy energy drink

Page 25: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Crescent’s organic certification and minimum caffeine provide strong differentiators in energy drinks market

Page 26: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Analysis

Page 27: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Advertising Expenses = $750000Variable cost per can = $ 1.02Variable cost per case = 24*1.02

= $24.48Selling price per case = 24*1.24

= $29.76

Profit per case = $5.28

Analysis (1/3)

Page 28: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Number to be sold to break even= 142046 Cases to be sold per month= 11838 Production capacity per month= 12000

Analysis (2/3)

Page 29: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

Profit per month = $(12000-11838)* 5.28

= $ 855.36

Annual Profit = $855.36*12 = $ 10264.32

Analysis (3/3)

Page 30: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis
Page 31: Crescent Pure: A Harvard Business School Case Analysis

This presentation was created by Ramji Binnani, SGSITS, Indore during a marketing internship under the guidance of Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM

Lucknow.