Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

48
Daniela Morales, Sergio Gutierrez, Edgar Lopez, Zhangde Lin Impact Capital Partners 2015 ACG Cup Competition

Transcript of Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Page 1: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Daniela Morales, Sergio Gutierrez, Edgar Lopez, Zhangde Lin

Impact Capital Partners

2015 ACG Cup Competi ti on

Page 2: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Index

Objective

Recommendation

Qualitative Analysis− Company Analysis− Industry Analysis

Quantitative Analysis− Purchase Price Analysis− IRR Analysis

Summary Conclusion

Alternative options

Appendix

2 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Intro →

Page 3: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Objective

Conduct a qualitative and quantitative analysis to

advise Impact Capital Partners on:

− Interest in buying ParentCo

− Purchase price of ParentCo

− Capital structure and alternative options

− Exit opportunities

3 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Recommendation

ValuationsIntro → AppendixSummary AlternativesIntro →

Page 4: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Impact Capital Partners should:

− Make an offer to purchase ParentCo

− Make an offer to purchase FashionCo based on 2016 performance

− Pursue a 2020 exit strategy to maximize IRR

− Break up the ParentCo by industry

Recommendation

4 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Recommendation

Page 5: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Impact Capital Partners

Company Analysis

Daniela Morales

Page 6: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

SWOT Analysis

6 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

StrengthsParentCo Long , established company On track to meet (or beat) projected

earnings Strong management team

FashionCo High growth projections for 2016

WeaknessesParentCo Decline in stock price of 9.72% in the

last year

FashionCo Performance uncertainty

Opportunities

ParentCo Undervalued Increase value through acquisition Profit after exit

FashionCo Synergies through acquisition Profit after exit

Threats

ParentCo Low industry future expected growth

FashionCo Not meeting projected performance Skepticism from ParentCo’s CFO

Inte

rnal

Ext

ern

al

Positive Negative

Company

Page 7: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Impact Capital Partners

Industry Analysis

Sergio Gutierrez

Page 8: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Porter’s Five Forces: Media Industry

8 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

• High customer loyalty• Low price sensitivity• Medium switching

costs• Recurring purchases

Buyer Power

MED

• Scattered suppliers • Low cost of inputs• Low switching costs

Supplier Power

LOW

• Abundance of substitute media

• High quality substitute media

Threats of Substitution

HIGH

• Economies of scale• Capital requirements• low growth• Internet

Threat of New Entrants

LOW

• Wide and diverse competitors

• Long, established competitors

• Exit barriers

Rivalry

MED

Industry

Page 9: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Porter’s Five Forces: Fashion Industry

9 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

• Men, women, and children

• High price sensitivity• High customer

acquisition price

Buyer Power

HIGH

• Low switching costs• Economies of scale• Low product

differentiation

Supplier Power

HIGH

• Abundance of substitute products

• Low switching costs• High buyer

propensity to substitute

Threats of Substitution

HIGH

• Economies of scale• High branding costs• High capital

requirements

Threat of New Entrants

LOW

• Competitors are big• Low long-term

growth rates• Low product

differentiation

Rivalry

HIGH

Industry

Page 10: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Impact Capital Partners

Quantitative Analysis

Edgar Lopez

Page 11: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Capitalization Table

11 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

(figures in millions except per share amount)

As of Round 1 As of Round 2 Internal EstimateShare Price Mkt. Value Share Price Mkt. Value

Masterson Family

Harvey Masterson 4.7 15.5% $18.3 $85.1 $16.5 $76.9William Masterson 0.9 3.0% 18.3 16.5 16.5 14.9Rebecca Masterson 1.7 5.5% 18.3 30.2 16.5 27.3

Total 7.2 24.0% $18.3 $131.8 $16.5 $119.0

Investors

Activist Capital 1.2 3.9% $18.3 $21.4 $16.5 $19.3Other Institutional Investors 6.8 22.8% 18.3 125.1 16.5 112.9

Total 8.0 26.7% $18.3 $146.5 $16.5 $132.2

Public 14.8 49.3% $18.3 $271.0 $16.5 $244.6

Total 30.0 100.0% $18.3 $549.3 $16.5 $495.9

Fully Diluted Shares

%Shareholders

Quantitative

Page 12: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Purchase Price Analysis

12 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

EBITDA Purchase Multiple 6.1x 6.6x 7.1x 7.6x 8.1x2015E EBITDA $80.8 $80.8 $80.8 $80.8 $80.8Implied Total Enterprise Value $489.5 $529.89 $570.3 $610.7 $651.1

Plus: Net Debt $2.8 $2.8 $2.8 $2.8 $2.8Implied Equity Value $492.3 $532.7 $573.1 $613.5 $653.9

Sale Price As of Round 1 As of Round 2

Market Capitalization $549.3 $495.9Control Premium (15%) 82.4 74.4Debt 70.1 70.1Cash (67.2) (67.2)

Implied Total Equity Value $634.5 $573.1

As of Round 2 by Entity MediaCo ApparelCoNet Income % 66.3% 33.7%

Market Capitalization $329.0 $166.9Control Premium (15%) 49.3 25.0Debt 70.1 0.0Cash (55.9) (11.3)

Implied Total Equity Value $392.4 $180.7

Quantitative

Page 13: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Purchase Price

$392.4 ($mm)

Multiples 2014A 2015E

Sales 0.7x 0.7xEBITDA 6.1x 6.7x

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

Perp. Method

Multiple Method

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000

$265.7

$195.0

$262.1

$178.6

$560.8

$441.7

$553.1

$404.6

$419.2

$269.7

$819.4

$573.4

$808.2

$525.2

$736.3

$603.7

$726.2

$553.0

$656.3

$528.5

Implied Total Enterprise Value ($ in millions)

Relevant MultiplePrecedent Transac-

tions

3.0x-8.9x

0.5x-1.5x

0.5x-1.5x

3.0x-8.9x

Multiple Method:3.0x-8.9x exit multiple

8.8-10.8% discount rate

Perp. Method:1.0-3.0% growth rate

8.8-10.8% discount rateDCF Analysis

6.9x-9.4x

6.9x-9.4x

1.0x-1.4x

1.0x-1.5x

Public Compara-bles

$392.4

Precedent Transactions

Fit

Transaction 3

Transaction 6

Transaction 7

Transaction 9

Public Comparables

Fit

NYT CompanyTime Inc.

MediaCoFinancial Data ($mm)

  2014A 2015E

Sales $535.1 $527.8

EBITDA $64.1 $58.7

Illustrative Valuation Analysis: MediaCo

13 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Source: ACG Cup 2015 Case

Quantitative

Page 14: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Purchase Price

$180.7 ($mm)

Multiples 2014A 2015E

Sales 0.7x 0.6xEBITDA 8.8x 8.2x

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

Perp. Method

Multiple Method

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800

$113.6

$106.4

$122.4

$114.2

$74.5

$92.7

$80.3

$99.5

$208.3

$143.3

$336.6

$270.0

$362.8

$290.0

$244.0

$246.1

$263.0

$264.2

$693.9

$316.4

Implied Total Enterprise Value ($ in millions)

Relevant MultiplePrecedent Transac-

tions

5.2x-13.2x

0.4x-1.3x

0.4x-1.3x

5.2x-13.2x

Multiple Method:5.2x-13.2x exit multiple

11.0-13.0% discount rate

Perp. Method:8.0-9.0% growth rate

11.0-13.0% discount rateDCF Analysis

4.5x-12.0x

4.5x-12.0x

0.3x-0.9x

0.3x-0.9x

Public Compara-bles

$180.7

ApparelCoFinancial Data ($mm)

  2014A 2015E

Sales $258.1 $278.2

EBITDA $20.5 $22.1

Precedent Transactions

Fit

Transaction 6

Transaction 8

Transaction 13

Transaction 15

Transaction 17

Transaction 20

Public Comparables

Fit

Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

Illustrative Valuation Analysis: ApparelCo

14 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Source: ACG Cup 2015 Case

Quantitative

Page 15: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Base Case: Assumptions & Summary of Operating Results

15 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS Pro Forma 1 2 3 4 5Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Total revenues $790.5 $793.2 $806.0 $824.1 $848.3 $877.5 $911.6 $954.7

% growth 0.3% 1.6% 2.2% 2.9% 3.4% 3.9% 4.7%

Gross Profit $267.2 $267.9 $265.5 $265.8 $276.2 $281.9 $289.1 $299.4% margin 33.8% 33.8% 32.9% 32.3% 32.6% 32.1% 31.7% 31.4%

EBITDA $89.2 $84.7 $80.8 $76.9 $85.3 $89.1 $92.2 $96.6% margin 11.3% 10.7% 10.0% 9.3% 10.1% 10.2% 10.1% 10.1%

Other Financial DataCash interest expense $41.0 $40.0 $38.9 $37.7 $36.2Total interest expense 45.1 44.2 43.2 42.0 40.6(Increase) decrease in net working capital 0.7 (2.3) (2.4) (2.4) (2.2)Capital expenditures 9.7 9.1 9.5 9.9 10.5

Sources & Uses of Funds% of Mult. of Cumulative

Sources of Funds ($mm) Total Cap. 2015 EBITDA Multiple Uses of Funds ($mm)Revolver $0.0 0.0% 0.0x 0.0x Purchase equity $570.3Term Loan 282.8 48.6% 3.5x 3.5x Repay bank debt 70.1Subordinated notes 0.0 0.0% 0.0x 3.5x Financing Fees 6.4Mezzanine Debt 202.0 34.7% 2.5x 6.0x Other Fees & Expenses 2.0Impact Capital Partners Equity 96.7 16.6% 1.2x 7.2x Cash on balance sheet (67.2) Total Sources of Funds $581.5 100.0% 7.2x 7.2x Total Uses of Funds $581.5

Quantitative

Page 16: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Base Case: Capital Structure & Credit Statistics

16 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Pro Forma

CAPITALIZATION 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Cash $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0

Revolver $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0Term Loan 282.8 259.9 234.3 205.9 174.8 140.2 Total Bank Debt $282.8 $259.9 $234.3 $205.9 $174.8 $140.2

Senior notes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Senior Debt $282.8 $259.9 $234.3 $205.9 $174.8 $140.2

Mezzanine Debt 202.0 206.0 210.2 214.4 218.7 223.1Existing debt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Debt $484.8 $465.9 $444.5 $420.3 $393.6 $363.3

Shareholders' equity 94.7 100.9 115.0 132.0 151.5 174.4 Total Capitalization $579.46 $566.9 $559.5 $552.3 $545.1 $537.7

Cash available for debt service $22.9 $25.5 $28.5 $31.0 $34.7Cumulative cash available for debt service 22.9 48.4 76.9 107.9 142.6% of bank debt outstanding 91.9% 82.9% 72.8% 61.8% 49.6%

CREDIT STATISTICSEBITDA / Cash interest expense 1.9x 2.1x 2.3x 2.4x 2.7x(EBITDA-Cap Ex) / Cash interest expense 1.6x 1.9x 2.0x 2.2x 2.4x

EBITDA / Total interest expense 1.7x 1.9x 2.1x 2.2x 2.4x(EBITDA-Cap Ex) / Total interest expense 1.5x 1.7x 1.8x 2.0x 2.1x

Bank debt / EBITDA 3.4x 2.7x 2.3x 1.9x 1.5xMezzanine debt / EBITDA 2.7x 2.5x 2.4x 2.4x 2.3xTotal debt / EBITDA 6.1x 5.2x 4.7x 4.3x 3.8x

Quantitative

Page 17: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Downside Case: Assumptions & Summary of Operating Results

17 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS Pro Forma 1 2 3 4 5Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Total revenues $790.5 $793.2 $806.0 $824.1 $848.3 $877.5 $911.6 $954.7

% growth 0.3% 1.6% 2.2% 2.9% 3.4% 3.9% 4.7%

Gross Profit $267.2 $267.9 $265.5 $265.8 $276.2 $281.9 $289.1 $299.4% margin 33.8% 33.8% 32.9% 32.3% 32.6% 32.1% 31.7% 31.4%

EBITDA $89.2 $84.7 $80.8 $76.9 $84.6 $88.5 $91.5 $95.8% margin 11.3% 10.7% 10.0% 9.3% 10.0% 10.1% 10.0% 10.0%

Other Financial DataCash interest expense $41.0 $40.1 $39.0 $37.7 $36.3Total interest expense 45.1 44.2 43.2 42.0 40.7(Increase) decrease in net working capital 0.7 (2.3) (2.4) (2.4) (2.2)Capital expenditures 9.7 9.1 9.5 9.9 10.5

Sources & Uses of Funds% of Mult. of Cumulative

Sources of Funds ($mm) Total Cap. 2015 EBITDA Multiple Uses of Funds ($mm)Revolver $0.0 0.0% 0.0x 0.0x Purchase equity $570.3Term Loan 282.8 48.6% 3.5x 3.5x Repay bank debt 70.1Subordinated notes 0.0 0.0% 0.0x 3.5x Financing Fees 6.4Mezzanine Debt 202.0 34.7% 2.5x 6.0x Other Fees & Expenses 2.0Impact Capital Partners Equity 96.7 16.6% 1.2x 7.2x Cash on balance sheet (67.2) Total Sources of Funds $581.5 100.0% 7.2x 7.2x Total Uses of Funds $581.5

Quantitative

Page 18: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Downside Case: Capitalization & Credit Statistics

18 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

CREDIT STATISTICSEBITDA / Cash interest expense 1.9x 2.1x 2.3x 2.4x 2.6x(EBITDA-Cap Ex) / Cash interest expense 1.6x 1.9x 2.0x 2.2x 2.3x

EBITDA / Total interest expense 1.7x 1.9x 2.0x 2.2x 2.4x(EBITDA-Cap Ex) / Total interest expense 1.5x 1.7x 1.8x 1.9x 2.1x

Bank debt / EBITDA 3.4x 2.8x 2.3x 1.9x 1.5xMezzanine debt / EBITDA 2.7x 2.5x 2.4x 2.4x 2.3xTotal debt / EBITDA 6.1x 5.3x 4.8x 4.3x 3.8x

Pro Forma

CAPITALIZATION 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Cash $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0

Revolver $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0Term Loan 282.8 259.9 234.8 206.8 176.2 142.2 Total Bank Debt $282.8 $259.9 $234.8 $206.8 $176.2 $142.2

Senior notes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Senior Debt $282.8 $259.9 $234.8 $206.8 $176.2 $142.2

Mezzanine Debt 202.0 206.0 210.2 214.4 218.7 223.1Existing debt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Debt $484.8 $465.9 $445.0 $421.2 $395.0 $365.3

Shareholders' equity 94.7 100.9 114.6 131.1 150.1 172.4 Total Capitalization $579.46 $566.9 $559.5 $552.3 $545.1 $537.7

Cash available for debt service $22.9 $25.1 $28.0 $30.5 $34.1Cumulative cash available for debt service 22.9 48.0 76.0 106.5 140.6% of bank debt outstanding 91.9% 83.0% 73.1% 62.3% 50.3%

Quantitative

Page 19: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Upside Case: Assumptions & Summary of Operating Results

19 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS Pro Forma 1 2 3 4 5Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Total revenues $790.5 $793.2 $806.0 $824.1 $1,107.6 $1,160.5 $1,219.1 $1,289.0

% growth 0.3% 1.6% 2.2% 34.4% 4.8% 5.1% 5.7%

Gross Profit $267.2 $267.9 $265.5 $265.8 $324.4 $335.1 $347.0 $362.4% margin 33.8% 33.8% 32.9% 32.3% 29.3% 28.9% 28.5% 28.1%

EBITDA $89.2 $84.7 $80.8 $76.9 $76.6 $114.2 $119.4 $126.0% margin 11.3% 10.7% 10.0% 9.3% 6.9% 9.8% 9.8% 9.8%

Other Financial DataCash interest expense $41.0 $39.6 $38.5 $37.5 $35.5Total interest expense 45.1 43.8 42.7 41.8 39.9(Increase) decrease in net working capital 0.7 4.7 (37.2) (5.0) (5.2)Capital expenditures 9.7 13.7 13.8 14.2 16.2

Sources & Uses of Funds% of Mult. of Cumulative

Sources of Funds ($mm) Total Cap. 2015 EBITDA Multiple Uses of Funds ($mm)Revolver $0.0 0.0% 0.0x 0.0x Purchase equity $570.3Term Loan 282.8 48.6% 3.5x 3.5x Repay bank debt 70.1Subordinated notes 0.0 0.0% 0.0x 3.5x Financing Fees 6.4Mezzanine Debt 202.0 34.7% 2.5x 6.0x Other Fees & Expenses 2.0Impact Capital Partners Equity 96.7 16.6% 1.2x 7.2x Cash on balance sheet (67.2) Total Sources of Funds $581.5 100.0% 7.2x 7.2x Total Uses of Funds $581.5

Quantitative

Page 20: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

CREDIT STATISTICSEBITDA / Cash interest expense 1.9x 1.9x 3.0x 3.2x 3.6x(EBITDA-Cap Ex) / Cash interest expense 1.6x 1.6x 2.6x 2.8x 3.1x

EBITDA / Total interest expense 1.7x 1.8x 2.7x 2.9x 3.2x(EBITDA-Cap Ex) / Total interest expense 1.5x 1.4x 2.4x 2.5x 2.8x

Bank debt / EBITDA 3.4x 2.9x 1.9x 1.4x 1.0xMezzanine debt / EBITDA 2.7x 2.7x 1.9x 1.8x 1.8xTotal debt / EBITDA 6.1x 5.6x 3.7x 3.2x 2.7x

Upside Case: Capitalization & Credit Statistics

20 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Pro Forma

CAPITALIZATION 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Cash $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0

Revolver $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $14.5 $0.0 $0.0Term Loan 282.8 259.9 219.7 197.8 168.6 121.1 Total Bank Debt $282.8 $259.9 $219.7 $212.2 $168.6 $121.1

Senior notes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Senior Debt $282.8 $259.9 $219.7 $212.2 $168.6 $121.1

Mezzanine Debt 202.0 206.0 210.2 214.4 218.7 223.1Existing debt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Debt $484.8 $465.9 $429.9 $426.6 $387.3 $344.2

Shareholders' equity 94.7 100.9 185.2 216.0 250.0 289.0 Total Capitalization $579.46 $566.9 $615.1 $642.6 $637.3 $633.3

Cash available for debt service $22.9 $23.8 $7.5 $43.6 $47.5Cumulative cash available for debt service 22.9 46.7 54.2 97.9 145.3% of bank debt outstanding 91.9% 77.7% 75.1% 59.6% 42.8%

Quantitative

Page 21: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Impact Capital Partners Equity 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Initial Investment ($94.7)Equity Participation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 413.2

($94.7) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $413.2

Exit ValuationExit Year 2020Exit Multiple 8.1xExit Year EBITDA $96.6 Exit Valuation (Total Firm Value) $778.5

Revolver $0.0Term Loan 140.2Mezzanine Debt 223.1Existing debt 0.0Transaction Fees 2.0 Total Debt 365.3Less: Accumulated Cash 0.0 Net Debt $365.3

Allocation Proceeds (Equity Value) $413.2

Base Case: IRR Analysis

21 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Equity Allocation EquityInvestment Ownership

FashionCo Seller Equity 0.0 0.0%Impact Capital Partners Equity 94.7 100.0% Total $94.7 100.0%

Sponsor IRR

33.7%Sponsor IRR

34.3%

Quantitative

Page 22: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Downside Case: IRR Analysis

22 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Exit ValuationExit Year 2020Exit Multiple 8.1xExit Year EBITDA $95.8 Exit Valuation (Total Firm Value) $772.1

Revolver $0.0Term Loan 142.2Mezzanine Debt 223.1Existing debt 0.0Transaction Fees 2.0 Total Debt 367.3Less: Accumulated Cash 0.0 Net Debt $367.3

Allocation Proceeds (Equity Value) $404.8

Equity Allocation EquityInvestment Ownership

FashionCo Seller Equity 0.0 0.0%Impact Capital Partners Equity 94.7 100.0% Total $94.7 100.0%

Impact Capital Partners Equity 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Initial Investment ($94.7)Equity Participation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 404.8

($94.7) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $404.8

Sponsor IRR

33.7%

Quantitative

Page 23: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Impact Capital Partners Equity 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Initial Investment ($94.7)Equity Participation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 512.6

($94.7) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $512.6

Equity Allocation EquityInvestment Ownership

FashionCo Seller Equity 0.0 23.4%Impact Capital Partners Equity 94.7 76.6% Total $94.7 100.0%

Exit ValuationExit Year 2020Exit Multiple 8.1xExit Year EBITDA $126.0 Exit Valuation (Total Firm Value) $1,015.5

Revolver $0.0Term Loan 121.1Mezzanine Debt 223.1Existing debt 0.0Transaction Fees 2.0 Total Debt 346.2Less: Accumulated Cash 0.0 Net Debt $346.2

Allocation Proceeds (Equity Value) $669.3

Sponsor IRR

40.2%

Upside Case: IRR Analysis

23 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Quantitative

Page 24: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

IRR Summary

24 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Downside Base Upside0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

33.7% 34.3%

40.2%

Total IRRAdditional IRRMinimum IRR

Quantitative

Page 25: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Impact Capital Partners

Summary Recommendation

Zhangde Lin

Page 26: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Leverage Buyout

CompanyCriteria ParentCo FashionCo

Mature industry and/or company

√ √

Clean balance sheet with low leverage

√ √

Strong management team and potential synergies

√ √

Steady cash flows √ √

Low future capital expenditure and working

capital requirements√ √

Possible sale of underperforming/non-core

assets√ √

Feasible exit options √ √

26 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Summary

Page 27: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Conclusion

Impact Capital Partners should:− Make an offer to purchase ParentCo – $573.1 million

− Capital Structure:

− Make an offer to purchase FashionCo if they meet their 2016 projections

− Pursue a 2020 exit strategy to maximize IRR:

− Break up the ParentCo by industry

27 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Downside Case Base Case Upside Case

33.7% 34.3% 40.2%

Sources & Uses of FundsMult. of

Sources of Funds ($mm) 2015 EBITDA Uses of Funds ($mm)Revolver $0.0 0.0x Purchase equity $570.3Term Loan 282.8 3.5x Repay bank debt 70.1Subordinated notes 0.0 0.0x Financing Fees 6.4Mezzanine Debt 202.0 2.5x Other Fees & Expenses 2.0Impact Capital Partners Equity 96.7 1.2x Cash on balance sheet (67.2) Total Sources of Funds $581.5 7.2x Total Uses of Funds $581.5

Summary

Page 28: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Impact Capital Partners

Alternative Options

Zhangde Lin

Page 29: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Alternative Options

− Roll over the non-public existing shareholder equity

− Public share repurchase

− Seek other private equity partners

− Raise capital from private investors

29 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Alternatives

Page 30: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Impact Capital Partners

Appendix

Page 31: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Appendix Index

31 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Appendix

Company Background: ParentCo 32

Company Background: fashionCo 33

SWOT Analysis 34

Valuation Analysis: MediaCo 35

Valuation Analysis: ApparelCo 37

Valuation Analysis: FashionCo 39

Comparable Company Transactions 41

Comparable Public Companies 43

WACC Analysis 45

Control Premium Analysis 47

Assumptions and Financial Models 48

Page 32: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Company Background: ParentCo

32 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Founded approximately 40 years ago by Harvey Masterson Comprised on two entities: MediaCo and ApparelCo

− Few synergies due to differences in industries

MediaCo Publishing of daily, weekly and

monthly periodicals focused on consumer product reviews− Account for over 90% of revenues− Niche market of 45 to 65 year olds

Consumer product reviews website Small television production company

− Not very profitable. However, enhances marketing reach

Considerations:− Limited opportunities for organic growth

in the coming years, except for attracting a younger audience

ApparelCo Funded 10 years ago by William Masterson Design, development, sourcing, marketing,

and distribution of apparel for men and women

High quality and fashionable products Target audience between the age 18 and

35 years old Lower margins due to higher SG&A

expenses

Considerations:− Management believes that by achieving a

greater scale and streamlining operations they can reduce SG&A expenses by 2% of revenue

Appendix

Page 33: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Company Background: FashionCo

33 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Founded 40 years ago Privately held by a small group of passive investors Engages in design, sourcing, marketing, and distribution of

apparel and accessories for men, women and children− Products known for their affordability

Products are carried by major apparel retailers throughout the country

Retail and outlet stores sales account for less than 10% of total sales

Open for sale after 2016− Open to alternative structures such as stock rollover or earn-out

Considerations: − Synergies between ApparelCo and FashionCo could reduce SG&A

expenses by 3.5% per year

Appendix

Page 34: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

SWOT Analysis by Company

34 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

StrengthsMediaCo Long, established companyApparelCo High quality and fashionable apparel Young target audience Revenue growth in line with comp.

companiesFashionCo Ample distribution channels Affordable products

WeaknessesMediaCo Non-diversified revenue stream Low profits in Production portionApparelCo Few synergies with MediaCo Lower profit marginsFashionCo Lack of owners interest in industry Untrendy products

Opportunities

MediaCo Capturing new market segment Strengthening brands ApparelCo Faster future growth than MediaCo Economies of scaleFashionCo Increase sales percentage in brick

and mortar stores

Threats

MediaCo Low industry future expected growthApparelCo Possible request for a seat in the

board of directors from activist hedge funds

FashionCo Lack of customer interest Economic downturn can impact

demand

Inte

rnal

Ext

ern

al

Positive Negative

Appendix

Page 35: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Purchase Price

$392.4 ($mm)

Multiples 2014A 2015E

Sales 0.7x 0.7xEBITDA 6.1x 6.7x

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

Perp. Method

Multiple Method

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000

$265.7

$195.0

$262.1

$178.6

$560.8

$441.7

$553.1

$404.6

$419.2

$269.7

$819.4

$573.4

$808.2

$525.2

$736.3

$603.7

$726.2

$553.0

$656.3

$528.5

Implied Total Enterprise Value ($ in millions)

Relevant MulitplePrecedent Transac-

tions

3.0x-8.9x

0.5x-1.5x

0.5x-1.5x

3.0x-8.9x

Multiple Method:3.0x-8.9x exit multiple

8.8-10.8% discount rate

Perp. Method:1.0-3.0% growth rate

8.8-10.8% discount rateDCF Analysis

6.9x-9.4x

6.9x-9.4x

1.0x-1.4x

1.0x-1.5x

Public Compara-bles

$392.4

Precedent Transactions

Fit

Transaction 3

Transaction 6

Transaction 7

Transaction 9

Public Comparables

Fit

NYT CompanyTime Inc.

MediaCoFinancial Data ($mm)

  2014A 2015E

Sales $535.1 $527.8

EBITDA $64.1 $58.7

Illustrative Valuation Analysis: MediaCo

35 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Source: ACG Cup 2015 Case

Appendix

Page 36: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Preliminary Discounted Cash Flow and Sensitivity Analysis: MediaCo

36 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

$ in millions

Cash Flow 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020ENet Sales $522.3 $522.9 $524.5 $528.5 $539.1

% growth -1.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.8% 2.0% Perp growth rate / multiple 2.0% 6.0x

PF EBITDA 56.0 62.0 62.2 62.7 63.9 PV of UFCF $153.2 $153.2

% margin 10.7% 11.9% 11.9% 11.9% 11.9% Discount rate 9.8% 9.8%

Depreciation & Amortization 16.0 14.2 14.2 14.4 14.6 Terminal value $563.3 $382.9

PF EBIT 40.0 47.8 47.9 48.3 49.3 PV of terminal value $353.5 $240.2

% margin 7.7% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% TEV $506.7 $393.4Taxes @ 35% 14.0 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.2 Net debt $14.1 $14.1 Unlevered Net Income $26.0 $31.1 $31.2 $31.4 $32.0 Equity value $492.5 $379.3

+ Depreciation & Amortization 16.0 14.2 14.2 14.4 14.6 Implied EBITDA multiple 8.6x 6.7x

- Capital expenditures 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.9 - Changes in working capital 0.5 0.1 (0.2) (0.4) (1.1) Implied Sales multiple 1.0x 0.7x

Unlevered free cash flow $36.6 $40.5 $40.8 $41.4 $42.9

DCFPerpetuity

methodMultiples method

Perpetuity Method Multiples MethodGrowth Rate Exit Multiple

$507 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% $393 3.0x 6.0x 8.9x7.8% $593.6 $675.0 $790.6 7.8% $286.9 $416.6 $546.38.8% $519.6 $577.9 $656.3 8.8% $280.8 $404.7 $528.59.8% $463.3 $506.7 $562.8 9.8% $275.1 $393.4 $511.710.8% $419.2 $452.5 $494.3 10.8% $269.7 $382.8 $495.911.8% $383.9 $410.0 $442.1 11.8% $264.6 $372.7 $480.8

DiscountRate

DiscountRate

Sensativity Analysis

Appendix

Page 37: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Purchase Price

$180.7 ($mm)

Multiples 2014A 2015E

Sales 0.7x 0.6xEBITDA 8.8x 8.2x

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

Perp. Method

Multiple Method

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800

$113.6

$106.4

$122.4

$114.2

$74.5

$92.7

$80.3

$99.5

$208.3

$143.3

$336.6

$270.0

$362.8

$290.0

$244.0

$246.1

$263.0

$264.2

$693.9

$316.4

Implied Total Enterprise Value ($ in millions)

Relevant MultiplePrecedent Transac-

tions

5.2x-13.2x

0.4x-1.3x

0.4x-1.3x

5.2x-13.2x

Multiple Method:5.2x-13.2x exit multiple

11.0-13.0% discount rate

Perp. Method:8.0-9.0% growth rate

11.0-13.0% discount rateDCF Analysis

4.5x-12.0x

4.5x-12.0x

0.3x-0.9x

0.3x-0.9x

Public Compara-bles

$180.7

ApparelCoFinancial Data ($mm)

  2014A 2015E

Sales $258.1 $278.2

EBITDA $20.5 $22.1

Precedent Transactions

Fit

Transaction 6

Transaction 8

Transaction 13

Transaction 15

Transaction 17

Transaction 20

Public Comparables

Fit

Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

Illustrative Valuation Analysis: ApparelCo

37 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Source: ACG Cup 2015 Case

Appendix

Page 38: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Preliminary Discounted Cash Flow and Sensitivity Analysis: ApparelCo

38 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Cash Flow 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020ENet Sales $301.8 $325.4 $353.1 $383.1 $415.6

% growth 8.5% 7.8% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5% Perp growth rate / multiple 8.5% 9.2x

PF EBITDA 23.7 27.2 29.5 32.0 34.7 PV of UFCF $45.9 $45.9

% margin 7.9% 8.4% 8.4% 8.4% 8.4% Discount rate 12.0% 12.0%

Depreciation & Amortization 4.3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 Terminal value $473.4 $318.4

PF EBIT 19.5 23.9 25.9 28.1 30.5 PV of terminal value $268.0 $180.3

% margin 6.4% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% TEV $313.9 $226.1Taxes @ 35% 6.8 8.4 9.1 9.8 10.7 Net debt ($11.3) ($11.3)Unlevered Net Income $12.6 $15.5 $16.8 $18.3 $19.8 Equity value $325.2 $237.4

+ Depreciation & Amortization 4.3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 Implied EBITDA multiple 14.2x 10.3x

- Capital expenditures 4.8 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 - Changes in working capital 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.7 3.0 Implied Sales multiple 1.1x 0.8x

Unlevered free cash flow $9.9 $12.4 $13.2 $14.3 $15.5

Perpetuity method

Multiples method

DCF

Perpetuity Method Multiples MethodGrowth Rate Exit Multiple

$314 8.00% 8.5% 9.0% $226 5.2x 9.2x 13.2x10.0% $551.5 $717.7 $1,042.4 10.0% $157.4 $243.1 $328.911.0% $370.6 $436.1 $533.6 11.0% $152.4 $234.4 $316.412.0% $279.7 $313.9 $359.3 12.0% $147.8 $226.1 $304.513.0% $225.3 $245.9 $271.6 13.0% $143.3 $218.3 $293.314.0% $189.1 $202.8 $219.1 14.0% $139.1 $210.9 $282.6

DiscountRate

DiscountRate

Sensativity Analysis

$ in millions

Appendix

Page 39: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

2014A Sales

2014A EBITDA

2015E Sales

2015E EBITDA

Perp. Method

Multiple Method

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500

$85.6

$79.7

$91.7

$93.5

$56.1

$69.4

$60.2

$81.4

$99.1

$76.7

$196.3

$201.8

$210.4

$236.8

$183.8

$184.3

$197.0

$216.3

$231.3

$181.2

Implied Total Enterprise Value ($ in millions)

Relevant MulitplePrecedent Transac-

tions

8.0x-10.0x

0.5x-2.0x

0.5x-2.0x

8.0x-10.0x

Multiple Method:7.0x-9.0x exit multiple

10.0-14.0% discount rate

Perp. Method:5.0-7.0% growth rate

10.0-14.0% discount rateDCF Analysis

6.0x-9.0x

8.0x-10.0x

0.5x-2.0x

0.5x-2.0x

Public Compara-bles

$132.0

FashionCoFinancial Data ($mm)

  2014A 2015E

Sales $194.5 $208.5

EBITDA $15.4 $18.1

Starting Valuation

$132.0 ($mm)

Multiples 2014A 2015E

Sales 0.7x 0.6xEBITDA 8.6x 7.3x

Precedent Transactions

Fit

Transaction 8

Transaction 13

Transaction 15

Transaction 17

Transaction 20

Public Comparables

Fit

Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

Illustrative Valuation Analysis: FashionCo

39 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Source: ACG Cup 2015 Case

Appendix

Page 40: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Perpetuity Method Multiples MethodGrowth Rate Exit Multiple

$137 6.3% 7.3% 8.3% $127 5.2x 9.2x 13.2x10.0% $176.0 $235.1 $361.1 10.0% $85.2 $137.0 $188.811.0% $139.5 $173.2 $231.3 11.0% $82.2 $131.7 $181.212.0% $115.7 $137.4 $170.5 12.0% $79.4 $126.7 $174.113.0% $99.1 $114.0 $135.3 13.0% $76.7 $122.0 $167.314.0% $86.8 $97.7 $112.4 14.0% $74.1 $117.5 $160.8

DiscountRate

DiscountRate

Sensativity Analysis

Perp growth rate / multiple 7.3% 9.2x

PV of UFCF $17.8 $17.8

Discount rate 12.0% 12.0%

Terminal value $168.2 $192.3

PV of terminal value $119.6 $108.9

TEV $137.4 $126.7Net debt $3.0 $3.0 Equity value $134.4 $123.7

Implied EBITDA multiple 7.6x 7.0x

Implied Sales multiple 0.7x 0.6x

DCFPerpetuity

methodMultiples method

Cash Flow 2015E 2016E 2017ENet Sales $208.5 $224.0 $240.1

% growth 7.5% 7.2%PF EBITDA 18.1 20.9 21.0

% margin 8.7% 9.3% 8.7%Depreciation & Amortization 2.9 2.3 3.3PF EBIT 15.1 18.6 17.7

% margin 7.3% 8.3% 7.4%Taxes @ 40% 6.1 7.4 7.1Unlevered Net Income $9.1 $11.2 $10.6

+ Depreciation & Amortization 2.9 2.3 3.3

- Capital expenditures 2.1 2.9 4.3 - Changes in working capital 4.7 2.1 2.1

Unlevered free cash flow $5.3 $8.6 $7.5

Preliminary Discounted Cash Flow and Sensitivity Analysis: FashionCo

40 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Source: ACG Cup 2015 Case

Appendix

Page 41: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Comparable Company Analysis – Comparable Transactions: Media

41 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

($ in millions)                                                             

  Announced     Target EV /   EV /           EBITDATransaction   Date     Enterprise Value   Revenue   EBITDA   Revenue   EBITDA   Margin                               Transaction 1   2014     $972   NA   11.7x  NA   $83   NA

Transaction 2   2014     690   NA   NA  NA   NA   NA

Transaction 3   2014     511   1.5x   8.9x  $334   58   17.2%

Transaction 4   2014     350   NA   NA  NA   NA   NA

Transaction 5   2014     25   0.2x   6.9x  139   4   2.6%

Transaction 6   2014     6   0.5x   3.5x  13   2   14.2%

Transaction 7   2013     105   0.8x   8.9x  140   12   8.4%

Transaction 8   2013     76   1.9x   NA  41   NA   NA

Transaction 9   2013     82   0.5x   3.0x  162   27   16.7%

Transaction 10   2013     252   1.1x   NA  239   NA   NA

Transaction 11   2013     3   0.3x   NA  12   NA   NA

Transaction 12   2013     829   2.1x   8.0x  386   103   26.7%

Transaction 13   2013     201   NA   NA  NA   NA   NA

Transaction 14   2013     355   2.1x   11.3x  171   31   18.4%

Transaction 15   2013     108   NA   17.0x  NA   6   NA

Transaction 16   2013     214   2.7x   NA  80   NA   NA

Transaction 17   2012     13   0.3x   8.7x  42   1   3.5%

Transaction 18   2012     86   1.0x   5.2x  85   16   19.5%

Transaction 19   2012     15   0.4x   8.6x  41   2   4.3%

                              

                              

    Min     $3   0.2x   3.0x           

    Max     972   2.7x   17.0x           

    Median     108   0.9x   8.6x           

    Mean     258   1.1x   8.5x           

Appendix

Page 42: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Comparable Company Analysis – Comparable Transactions: Apparel and Fashion

42 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

($ in millions)                                                             

    Announced     Target EV /   EV /           EBITDATransaction   Date     Enterprise Value   Revenue   EBITDA   Revenue   EBITDA   Margin                               Transaction 1   2014     $359   0.6x   NA  $633   NA  NA

Transaction 2   2014     189   NA   13.0x  NA   $15   NA

Transaction 3   2013     2,201   0.6x   9.8x  3,848   226   5.9%

Transaction 4   2013     1,486   1.4x   11.1x  1,031   134   13.0%

Transaction 5   2013     615   2.2x   9.6x  285   64   22.5%

Transaction 6   2013     253   1.3x   13.2x  194   19   9.9%

Transaction 7   2013     2,274   0.9x   8.0x  2,503   285   11.4%

Transaction 8   2013     567   1.0x   13.1x  562   43   7.7%

Transaction 9   2013     143   1.9x   13.5x  74   11   14.3%

Transaction 10   2013     1,000   1.1x   9.8x  921   102   11.0%

Transaction 11   2013     628   1.3x   7.2x  481   87   18.1%

Transaction 12   2013     18   0.4x   9.8x  46   2   4.0%

Transaction 13   2013     548   0.7x   8.7x  742   63   8.5%

Transaction 14   2012     2,847   1.2x   9.9x  2,406   288   12.0%

Transaction 15   2012     88   0.4x   5.2x  200   17   8.5%

Transaction 16   2012     852   0.4x   10.2x  1,969   84   4.3%

Transaction 17   2012     1,809   0.5x   8.4x  3,505   216   6.2%

Transaction 18   2012     246   0.5x   10.6x  478   23   4.9%

Transaction 19   2012     553   4.4x   10.9x  125   51   40.5%

Transaction 20   2012     58   0.4x   5.5x  139   11   7.6%

Transaction 21   2011     60   0.6x   10.6x  103   6   5.5%

Transaction 22   2011     60   0.6x   10.6x  103   6   5.5%

Transaction 23   2011     357   0.3x   NA  1,144   NA   NA

                             

                              

    Min     $18   0.3x   5.2x           

    Max     2,847   4.4x   13.5x           

    Median     548   0.7x   9.9x           

    Mean     748   1.0x   9.9x           

Appendix

Page 43: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Comparable Public Companies: Media Industry

43 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

(figures in millions except per share amount)                                                                                         Shares           LTM   LTM   LTM   LTM     EBITDA Sales EBITDACompany Ticker Stock Price   Outstanding   Debt   Cash   Sales   EBITDA   EBIT   Earnings   TEV Margin Multiple Multiple                                          Gannett Co., Inc. GCI 31.50   225.6   4,112.6   1,374.5   5,675.2   1,254.7   1,023.9   476.9   9,846.0 22.1% 1.7x 7.8x

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated LEE 3.73   53.7   815.0   17.8   657.1   160.2   112.9   (85.1)  997.6 24.4% 1.5x 6.2x

The McClatchy Company MNI 3.56   86.7   1,560.3   225.1   1,215.2   248.9   144.6   83.9   1,644.1 20.5% 1.4x 6.6xThe New York Times Company NYT 12.84   150.3   669.4   414.6   1,587.7   232.1   152.8   64.1   2,184.6 14.6% 1.4x 9.4xTime Inc. TIME 22.59   109.0   1,376.0   325.0   3,352.0   510.0   352.0   8.0   3,512.6 15.2% 1.0x 6.9x                                                                        Min   $997.6   1.0x 6.2x                               Max   $9,846.0   1.7x 9.4x                               Median   $2,184.6   1.4x 6.9x                               Mean   $3,637.0   1.4x 7.4x

Appendix

Page 44: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Comparable Public Companies: Apparel and Fashion

44 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

(figures in millions except per share amount)                                               Shares           LTM   LTM   LTM   LTM     EBITDA Sales EBITDACompany Ticker Stock Price   Outstanding   Debt   Cash   Sales   EBITDA   EBIT   Earnings   TEV Margin Multiple Multiple                                          Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. EVK 6.19   14.8   55.4   25.0   422.3   27.0   20.8   12.8   121.9 6.4% 0.3x 4.5xG-III Apparel Group, Ltd. GIII 79.35   22.4   71.2   21.5   1,931.7   152.4   135.9   80.2   1,825.9 7.9% 0.9x 12.0x

Oxford Industries Inc. OXM 61.25   16.5   108.5   6.4   951.8   121.9   85.3   45.9   1,110.8 12.8% 1.2x 9.1xPerry Ellis International Inc. PERY 20.45   15.7   172.5   49.2   899.0   34.7   21.3   (25.1)  444.9 3.9% 0.5x 12.8xPVH Corp. PVH 114.35   82.4   3,907.4   461.1   8,250.7   1,202.2   948.9   321.0   12,867.9 14.6% 1.6x 10.7xV.F. Corporation VFC 67.68   431.1   2,083.5   496.5   11,993.4   2,047.8   1,775.2   1,293.1   30,763.9 17.1% 2.6x 15.0x

                                                                      Min   $121.9   0.3x 4.5x                               Max   $30,763.9   2.6x 15.0x                               Median   $1,468.3   1.1x 11.3x                               Mean   $7,855.9   1.2x 10.7x

Appendix

Page 45: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

WACC Analysis: Media

45 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Cost of DebtDebt

Market Value of Equity

Total Capitalizatio

nDebt to Equity

Debt to Total Capitalization

Gannett Co., Inc. $4,112.6 $7,107.9 $11,220.5 57.9% 36.7% 4.2%Lee Enterprises, Incorporated 815.0 200.4 1,015.4 406.8% 80.3% 4.5%The McClatchy Company 1,560.3 308.8 1,869.1 505.3% 83.5% 5.5%The New York Times Company 669.4 1,929.9 2,599.2 34.7% 25.8% 3.9%Time Inc. 1,376.0 2,461.6 3,837.6 55.9% 35.9% 4.3%

Min 669.4 200.4 1,015.4 34.7% 25.8% 3.9%Max 4,112.6 7,107.9 11,220.5 505.3% 83.5% 5.5%Median $1,376.0 $1,929.9 $2,599.2 57.9% 36.7% 4.3%Mean 1,706.7 2,401.7 4,108.4 212.1% 52.4% 4.5%

Appendix

Page 46: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

WACC Analysis: Apparel

46 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Debt

Market Value of Equity

Total Capitalization

Debt to Equity

Debt to Total CapitalizationCost Of Debt

Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. $55.4 $91.6 $146.9 60.5% 37.7% 2.6%G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. 71.2 1,776.2 1,847.4 4.0% 3.9% 4.5%Oxford Industries Inc. 108.5 1,008.7 1,117.2 10.8% 9.7% 5.5%Perry Ellis International Inc. 172.5 321.6 494.1 53.6% 34.9% 4.3%PVH Corp. 3,907.4 9,421.6 13,329.0 41.5% 29.3% 4.3%V.F. Corporation 2,083.5 29,176.9 31,260.4 7.1% 6.7% 4.3%

Min 55.4 91.6 146.9 4.0% 3.9% 2.6%Max 3,907.4 29,176.9 31,260.4 60.5% 37.7% 5.5%Median $140.5 $1,392.5 $1,482.3 26.1% 19.5% 4.3%Mean 1,066.4 6,966.1 8,032.5 29.6% 20.4% 4.3%

Appendix

Page 47: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Control Premium Analysis

47 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Control Premium % Paid in Recent Transactions

MedianControl Number of

Premium TransactionsAll Transactions

2014 26.2% 7642013 20.7% 7772012 20.6% 565

Manufacturing - Apparel2014 34.9% 82013 11.0% 42012 32.8% 5

Printing, Publishing and Allied Industries2014 15.2% 112013 12.1% 142012 18.2% 8

Appendix

Page 48: Creighton team acg cup 2015 final round v final 2

Recommendation Company Industry QuantitativeIntro → AppendixSummary Alternatives

Impact Capital Partners

Refer to Assumptions and Financial Models Supplement

48 | CONFIDENTIAL – ACG Cup 2015

Assumptions and Financial Models

Appendix