Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers

26

Transcript of Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers

Page 1: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 2: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 3: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 4: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 5: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 6: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 7: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 8: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 9: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 10: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 11: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 12: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 13: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 14: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 15: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 16: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 17: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 18: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 19: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 20: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 21: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 22: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 23: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 24: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 25: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers
Page 26: Creating Optimal Reviews: Getting the most out of your code reviewers

WHO REVIEWS THE REVIEWERS? COPE...•Fake Reviewers •Vigilance •Non-institutional address can be a red flag. •Policy Options •Do not use author-suggested reviewers •Use author-suggested

WHO REVIEWS THE REVIEWERS? COPE...•Fake Reviewers •Vigilance •Non-institutional address can be a red flag. •Policy Options •Do not use author-suggested reviewers •Use author-suggested

Section B. 3a Read the reviews. Circle the things the reviewers like, and underline the things the reviews don’t like. Yellow River Fisherman This is.

Section B. 3a Read the reviews. Circle the things the reviewers like, and underline the things the reviews don’t like. Yellow River Fisherman This is.

Remarks on three recent reviews of The Autonomy of ...cfranks/ReviewsResponse.pdf · The Autonomy of Mathematical Knowledge curtis franks ... All three reviewers have made substantial

Remarks on three recent reviews of The Autonomy of ...cfranks/ReviewsResponse.pdf · The Autonomy of Mathematical Knowledge curtis franks ... All three reviewers have made substantial

List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include ...

List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include ...

What Does PCORI Want? An Open Discussion of PCORI Reviews, Reviewers and Successes Lenore Arab, PhD, MSc

What Does PCORI Want? An Open Discussion of PCORI Reviews, Reviewers and Successes Lenore Arab, PhD, MSc

Canadian Society for Civil Engineering · Division chairs to identify and invite reviewers. Each paper should receive a minimum of two reviews two reviews, one of which can be from

Canadian Society for Civil Engineering · Division chairs to identify and invite reviewers. Each paper should receive a minimum of two reviews two reviews, one of which can be from

Reviewers Guide

Reviewers Guide

Random Inspections and Periodic Reviews: Optimal Dynamic ... · Random Inspections and Periodic Reviews: Optimal Dynamic Monitoring Felipe Varas y Iv an Marinovicz Andrzej Skrzypacz

Random Inspections and Periodic Reviews: Optimal Dynamic ... · Random Inspections and Periodic Reviews: Optimal Dynamic Monitoring Felipe Varas y Iv an Marinovicz Andrzej Skrzypacz

About OutdoorInformer.com Mission: Delivers outdoor gear reviews and news Profile: Went “live” February 2010 8 Writers/Reviewers Partnering relationships.

About OutdoorInformer.com Mission: Delivers outdoor gear reviews and news Profile: Went “live” February 2010 8 Writers/Reviewers Partnering relationships.

2017 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Reviewers · 2018. 1. 30. · 1 2017 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Reviewers *Reviewers who complete more than two reviews in a

2017 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Reviewers · 2018. 1. 30. · 1 2017 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Reviewers *Reviewers who complete more than two reviews in a

Oregon Work Zone Reviews Summary Report 2017 · 2017 Work Zone Reviews Summary Report | 4 The Work Zone Review Evalua on Form (Figure 1) is used by Reviewers to record scores, notes

Oregon Work Zone Reviews Summary Report 2017 · 2017 Work Zone Reviews Summary Report | 4 The Work Zone Review Evalua on Form (Figure 1) is used by Reviewers to record scores, notes

Populate Reviewers

Populate Reviewers

Methodology for JBI umbrella reviews...Methodology for JBI umbrella reviews Abstract Every year the Joanna Briggs Institute publishes a Reviewers' Manual, which is designed to support

Methodology for JBI umbrella reviews...Methodology for JBI umbrella reviews Abstract Every year the Joanna Briggs Institute publishes a Reviewers' Manual, which is designed to support

AppSec California – Santa Monica, CA - Code Dx · Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and manual code reviews don’t find all software vulnerabilities Manual code reviewers

AppSec California – Santa Monica, CA - Code Dx · Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and manual code reviews don’t find all software vulnerabilities Manual code reviewers

518 Reviewers

518 Reviewers

Screening Colonoscopy Quality IndicatorsNature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.11:419-425. 2014. Optimal vs. Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Optimal Preparation Suboptimal Preparation

Screening Colonoscopy Quality IndicatorsNature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.11:419-425. 2014. Optimal vs. Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Optimal Preparation Suboptimal Preparation

What reviews can reveal about Reviewers? Jiří KLEMEŠ Chepos Brno, Morava, Czechoslovakia ECOSSE Edinburgh, Scotland UMIST Manchester, England The University.

What reviews can reveal about Reviewers? Jiří KLEMEŠ Chepos Brno, Morava, Czechoslovakia ECOSSE Edinburgh, Scotland UMIST Manchester, England The University.

MedTech Reviewers

MedTech Reviewers

The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2014 · make evidence informed policy decisions and often require evidence in short timeframes – as a result, “rapid reviews”

The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2014 · make evidence informed policy decisions and often require evidence in short timeframes – as a result, “rapid reviews”

THE REVIEWERS!

THE REVIEWERS!