Creating Better Learners by Driving Neuroplasticity
-
Upload
oecd-education -
Category
Education
-
view
980 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Creating Better Learners by Driving Neuroplasticity
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Améliorer les performances des apprenants grâce à la plasticité cérébrale Prof. Andrea A. Chiba University of California, San Diego
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
The goal of our Center: To understand the role of time and timing in learning
From the neuronal and millisecond scale…
…to the brain and year-long scale
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Ο χρόνος είναι µια οργανωτική αρχή του κόσµου Le temps est un principe organisateur du monde Time is an organizing principle of the world
5+3x6=48 =oops!
THE CHILD JUMPED ON THE FROG.
THE FROG JUMPED ON THE CHILD.
• Sequences underlie much of what we learn
• The brain is organized according to temporal patterns as is our world
• The ability of the brain and the world to integrate is crucial
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
STDP Spikes Local Field Potentials Cortical EEG
Time is an organizing principle of the brain
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012 Initiative 1
● Temporal patterns are learned and recognized ● Temporal pattern recognition is basic for perception, language, and cognitive processing ● Deficiency in rapid temporal processing underlies some learning deficits
Elements D C B Dt Dt Dt
time 1 2 3
wi A
Temporal pattern & sequence
How are temporal sequences organized?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012 OECD 2012
Naive model
How do brain circuits learn sequences?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Time matters for processing…
“say”
“stay”
Freq
uenc
y
100 ms
Time (milliseconds)
These wave forms are identical except for the artificially inserted gap and a compensating shrinkage of the waveform.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Time matters for processing…
“say”
“stay”
Freq
uenc
y
100 ms
Time (milliseconds)
These wave forms are identical except for the artificially inserted gap and a compensating shrinkage of the waveform.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
8 15 30 60 150
305
428
947
1466
1985
3023
3543
4062
Interstimulus Interval (ISI) in milliseconds
Per
cen
t C
orr
ect
ControlLanguage Impaired< 40ms - Phonemes40-350ms - Syllables
Tone Duration = 75 msec Tone 1 = 100 Hz, Tone 2 = 300 Hz
Time matters for learning…
Tallal & Piercy (1973) Nature.
6-8 year old language impaired children can’t do the task at short ISI’s: correlation, or causation?
PHONEME RANGE
SYLLABLE RANGE
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012 11
Timescales of investigation
Seconds Action selection Prediction Temporal Diff. learning Reinforcement
Neuromodulation Motor action Perceptual decisions Brain rhythms
100s of msec
Minutes Days Weeks Years
LTP Neurogenesis Spacing effects Expertise
10s of msec
Ba Da Whisking Spikes STDP Phoneme processing
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Clarke County School District
• The Clarke County School District of GA implemented the Fast ForWord products in eight schools during the 2006-‐2007 and 2007-‐2008 school years.
• 2,257 students had their reading achievement assessed with the Criterion-‐Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT). Some students used Fast ForWord products, others served as a comparison group.
• Based on CRCT results, on average, the Fast ForWord parMcipants made greater gains than the comparison group.
• Following Fast ForWord parMcipaMon in 2006-‐2007, 40% of students who were not proficient in 2006 crossed the proficiency threshold in 2007, compared to 27% of the students in the comparison group. These results were replicated by students who first used Fast ForWord products during the 2007-‐2008 school year: 42% of the parMcipants crossed the proficiency threshold in 2008, compared to 29% of the students in the comparison group.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
20082007
m08clrk03mflongitudinal scaled score CRCTwave 1 n=571wave 2 n=758wave 3 n=928
2006
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
0
2792
794
796
798
800
802
804
806
Wave 3 - Did not start Fast ForWord before 2008 CRCT
Wave 1- Started Fast ForWord in 2006-2007
Wave 2- Started Fast ForWord in 2007-2008
Pro
ficie
nc
y Th
resh
old
CRCT
Clarke County School District: CRCT Results
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012 Initiative 1
Inactive brain state
Active brain state
AM noise stimulus
State for effective coding and learning
of temporal patterns?
Brain Activation Improves Stimulus Fidelity in the Cortex
● Rodent Audition (Harris): Neural encoding of auditory temporal patterns is highly nonlinear and depends on brain state.
synchronized EEG, sleep, anesthesia
desynchronized EEG, alertness, attention
From the Harris Lab
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012 Initiative 1
Inactive brain state
Active brain state
clicks clicks
Rodent Audition (Harris): Neural encoding of auditory temporal patterns is highly nonlinear and depends on brain state.
Inactive brain state
Active brain state
clicks
Inactive brain state
Active brain state
clicks
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
inactivated
Rat
e (H
z)
Cor
tex
activated
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 60
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 60
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
400
0
200
400
0
200
Cortical Representation is Degraded in the Inactivated State
Auditory clicks:
inactivated
seconds
Rat
e (H
z)
seconds
Thal
amus
activated
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 60
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 60
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
1000
0
500
1000
0
500
Thalamic Activity Represents the Stimulus in Both States
Minces, Harris, Chiba
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Burst Spiking of a Single Cortical Neuron Modifies Global Brain State
Li, Poo, and Dan, Science 2009
Initiative 2
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012 18
Timescales of investigation
Seconds Action selection Prediction Temporal Diff. learning Reinforcement
Neuromodulation Motor action Perceptual decisions Brain rhythms
100s of msec
Minutes Days Weeks Years
LTP Neurogenesis Spacing effects Expertise
10s of msec
Ba Da Whisking Spikes STDP Phoneme processing
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
• Your brain is a giant oscillator (Buzsaki)
• EEG power in the gamma band of this oscillation (~40Hz) has been implicated in attention, perception, memory, language, and neural synchrony
• Gamma power increases throughout development.
• Can we use gamma power in toddlers to predict language ability?
Gamma Power and Language Learning April Benasich
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Resting Gamma Power In the Frontal Regions Predicts Preschool Language Scores
Resting Gamma Power at 36 months of age predicts language skills at 4 and 5 years of age
From Benasich Lab with Harris
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
• These results suggests brain dynamics are important for cognitive function
• Early diagnosis means we can now think about early interventions - perhaps a “FastForWord for toddlers” that can ameliorate the problems that these children face.
Brain dynamics matter for learning…
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
• In an inactivated state, cortical processing of the stimulus is degraded in Auditory, Visual, and Tactile modalities.
• Thalamic processing of the stimulus is maintained in the inactive state for auditory information but not for visual.
• Stimulus fidelity is enhanced by an activated brain state for all modalities. • Cortical activation can be achieved via neuromodulation from a subcortical source (Basal Forebrain Acetylcholine) or locally (a single bursting cortical neuron) or from training. • Natural activation in the form of gamma oscillations in babies predicts later language acquisition. • Early identification can allow for early intervention.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
How can we drive temporal processing at rapid timescales, while also driving group synchrony ? Gamelan, Attention, and Synchrony!
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Estimate and reproduce interval:
100s of ms
Monitor unison with target beat:
10s of ms
Adjust following interval Accordingly:
10s of ms
Synchronizing with an isochronous beat
Target beat
Player
Filter out Non-targets
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
10s of ms
100s of ms
10s of seconds
minutes
10s of minutes - hours
Details of note shaping, beat to beat alignment
Note to note and beat to beat movement
Rhythmic or melodic motives or themes
Melodic phrases and chord progressions
Musical structures and compositions
Accurate synchrony and integration
Amongst players, too
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
1) Does ability to pay attention correlate with ability to synchronize in a group setting?
2) Is this correlation, if it exists, solely due to differences in attentional allocation or do underlying differences in time processing also exist?
3) Since it is possible to improve one’s ability to synchronize through group music practice, can such improvements translate into measurable improvements in
attentional performance?
Research Questions
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
The Gamelan Project – preliminary study
Does ability to pay attention correlate with ability to synchronize in a group setting?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Experimental instrument: aluminum keys with piezoelectric film elements
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Audio recording data
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
-3-2
-10
12
302468101214
-3-2
-10
12
302468101214
Examples of good and poor synchronizers using vector strength analysis
poor
good
phase
phase
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Results
A significant correlation was found across all measures
p<0.0025
Other measures
Swann teacher ratings
Psychometric tests
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Passive Listening.
Sounds are all the same. We only care about timing.
deviant
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Short Condition
Long Condition
Time
Volta
ge u
V
deviant standard
Example A
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Short Condition
Long Condition
Example A
Time
Volta
ge u
V
deviant standard
Sensitivity to Time
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Synchronization
Subject drums to a steady beat, even when sounds are omitted.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Drumming Data
Accuracy
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
sound omitted
Time (seconds)
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Conclusions:
• There exists a correlation between the ability to synchronize and classic measures of attention
• We have developed measures of individual
differences in temporal processing at the behavioral and neural level
• A tool to measure the effects of musical training on measures of attention and classroom performance
• These differences correlate with other cognitive characteristics across individuals
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Neuroimaging techniques provide a window into The structural development necessary for timing
Courtesy of Terry Jernigan
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
How does white matter maturation relate to readiness for academic skills? Can development be facilitated?
Thus far, longitudinal DTI findings support continued microstructural change in white matter during late adolescence, and suggest ongoing refinement of
projection and association fibers into early adulthood. Structural asymmetries are correlated with measures several measures of academic performance.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Why does time matter?
• Time matters for processing
• Time matters for learning
• Time matters for action
• Thus, optimizing temporal processing is a key feature of the ability to learn effectively
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
Timescales of investigation
Seconds Action selection Prediction Temporal Diff. learning Reinforcement
Neuromodulation Motor action Perceptual decisions Brain rhythms
100s of msec
Minutes Days Weeks Years
LTP Neurogenesis Spacing effects Expertise
10s of msec
Ba Da
Whisking Spikes STDP Phoneme processing
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
What are the implications for education?
Timing is an essential property of the world and the brain and it must be optimal for optimal learning to occur. Plasticity is an inherent feature of the brain that can be optimized and remediated through specific types of behavioral training. Basic aspects of our culture including music, exercise, and enrichment may facilitate learning and cognition. We should be circumspect before removing them from the curriculum.