Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making...

1
Scan me! www.nhsaaa.net to visit our website: Find us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/nhsaaa Follow us on Twitter @NHSaaa Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business Background The Scottish Government 20/20 vision (2011) set out its strategic vision for achieving sustainable quality in the delivery of healthcare services across Scotland. Within NHS Ayrshire and Arran, a new Emergency Department (ED)/Combined Assessment Unit (CAU) opened transforming the delivery of unscheduled care and enabling the appropriate patients to be seen in the appropriate department, thus improving delivery of emergency care. Within the ED this transitional period was a suitable time to develop and introduce a framework for ongoing continuous clinical improvement. Aims We aimed to establish and maintain a continuous quality improvement (QI) programme. Identified priorities for improvement were: Improved staff confidences /competencies to assess deteriorating patients Improved care of deteriorating/septic patients Improved imaging process for out-of-hours patients Methodology Using improvement methodology we devised a driver diagram defining our improvement plan. PDSA (plan, do, study, act) methodology was used to carry out small tests of change and identify further areas for improvement. Improving journey and imaging process for out of hours patients Our aim here was to facilitate and expedite the care and management of minor injury patients attending ED during out of hours period. It was our vision to increase patient satisfaction by reducing their overall waiting time with the department. Initially the focus has been on supporting staff through a competency based framework to allow them to request x-rays out of hours. Additionally staff have been collecting baseline data to identify which aspects of the process could/should be improved. A focus of the month poster was developed to raise staff awareness of the improvement project and introduce a framework for ongoing continuous clinical improvement. Improved Staff confidence/ competencies to assess deteriorating patients We collected baseline data which has identified the need for improvement: Results/Outcomes Improved Care of Septic Patients The LNA identified areas in which nursing staff felt they would need additionally training/ competencies to be able to successfully initiate a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle . Unsurprisingly these were aspects of the bundle that are normally carried out by medics in the ED. Conclusion This is still very much ‘work in progress’ within the ED. Staff attitudes have changed with many embracing quality Improvement as part of our ‘daily business’. We plan to continue to support and develop a framework for Improvement which will be inclusive for all staff. By doing so we will be able to deliver the high quality healthcare that the people of Ayrshire and Arran expect and deserve. It is our vision that the introduction of both our new structured documentation and our new ‘buddy’ system will increase the compliance with patients having a documented A-E assessment and improve staff confidence and competency in assessment of the deteriorating patient. Improved Care of Septic Patients Our aim here was to introduce a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle. Again we indentified staffs learning needs by carrying out a learning needs analysis (LNA). Following this we devised a competency framework and process to allow nurses to carry out all aspects of the sepsis 6 bundle within the ED MIS18-058-DM Sharon Deans SCN, Sadie Wilson SCN, Rosemary Murray SCN, Stephanie Frearson S-04 Aim / Outcome Primary Drivers Secondary Drivers Improved staff confidence/competencies to assess Deteriorating patients Development of ED specific resus documentation Re-visit ED Care Rounding Improved Family Communication To establish/maintain an ongoing continuous Quality Improvement programme within UHA Emergency Department and achieve 95% compliance by July 2018 Identification of suitable staff Implementation of training/competencies Development of imaging criteria Improving patient journey and Imaging process for out of hours patients Team development to effectively deliver care required in relation to deteriorating patients Reliable identification and treatment of deteriorating patients Reliable identification and treatment of septic patients Improved Care of Septic Patients Develop/test A-E approach document Electronic Communication Board Revised Care rounding documentation Family Info leaflet Test ‘Sepsis Nurse’ Role Introduction of NEWs Focus of the Month Algorithm for process Competency framework Change Ideas for Testing University Hospital Ayr Emergency Department Improvement Plan 2017-2018 Evaluation of the ABCDE Approach Ratings Scales:[ 1= not at all 2= a little confidence, limited knowledge and skills in this area 3= reasonably confident/ I feel there are some gaps in my knowledge 4= confident 5= extremely confident QUESTION 1 2 3 4 5 Airway Airway obstruction Paradoxical chest and abdominal movements (‘see-saw’ respirations) and the use of the accessory muscles of respiration. Central cyanosis Breath sounds at the mouth or nose Breathing General signs of respiratory distress: sweating, central cyanosis, use of theaccessory muscles of respiration, and abdominal breathing Count the respiratory rate. Assess the depth of each breath, rhythm and whether chest expansion is equal on both sides. Chest deformity Breath sounds e.g. Stridor or wheeze Circulation Look at the colour of the hands and digits: are they blue, pink, pale or mottled? Assess the limb temperature by feeling the patient’s hands: are they cool or warm? Measure the capillary refill Assess the state of the veins Count the patient’s pulse rate Palpate peripheral and central pulses, assessing for presence, rate, quality, regularity and equality. Measure the patient’s blood pressure. Disability Make a rapid initial assessment of the patient’s conscious level using the AVPU method Review and treat the ABCs: exclude or treat hypoxia and hypotension. Drug-induced causes of depressed consciousness. Examine the pupils (size, equality and reaction to light). Exposure Examine the patient properly, full exposure and minimise heat loss. FEBRUARY FOCUS OF THE MONTH SCIENCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2017/2018 NURSE REQUESTED IMAGES FOR MINOR INJURIES(OOH PERIOD ) AIMS To facilitate and expedite the care and management of minor injury patients attending Accident and Emergency during out of hours period. To increase patient satisfaction by reducing their overall waiting time with the department To provide registered nurses opportunity to develop professional practice by achieving competence in examing a pre-determined group of patients attending Accident & Emergency (requesting x-ray examination as indicated) To ensure service delivery with Accident and Emergency remains patient focused. BOUNDARIES OF PRACTICE Fingers & thumb Foot Forearm Lower leg Big toe Wrist Ankle Hand Heel Foreign body exclusion TRAINING PROGRAMME INCLUDED *Professional Accountability within the framework of professional practice *Decision making at triage *Principles of clinical examination *Ionising radiation guidelines *Theory and implication of ionising radiation *X-Ray protocols *X-Ray requesting *Supervision *Assessment process and competency 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2/1/18 2/2/18 2/3/18 2/7/18 2/10/18 2/12/18 2/13/18 2/15/18 2/18/18 2/23/18 2/24/18 2/25/18 % of patients Date UHA ED Total % of patients with a Physiological Deterioration who have a documentented A-E Nursing Assessment in Resus bay Median Overall how well do we identify and initiate treatment of deteriorating patient Well Well but could improve Could improve No answer Are you confident inserting a venflon? YES NO Unsure further training would be of benefit? Are you confident taking bloods? YES NO Unsure further training would be of benefit? Are you confident taking blood cultures? YES NO Unsure further training would be of benefit? As part of our ongoing Improvement work within ED we plan to review/improve our care of deteriorating and/or septic patients. To enable us to understand staff’s understanding and learning needs please complete the following questionnaire. This should then be returned to Sadie or Kimberley. Many thanks. Please answer yes or no to each question YES NO UNSURE COMMENTS 1. Are you confident with the triage process? If no do feel further training would be of benefit? 2. If a patient scores high on NEWs are you confident with the escalation process? If no do you require further training? 3. Have you completed a PGD for administration of fluids? 4. Are you confident inserting a venflon? If no do you require further training? 5. Are you confident taking bloods? If no do you require further training? 6. Are you confident taking blood cultures? If no do you require further training? 7. Are you confident taking ABG’s? If no do you require further training? 8. Are you confident with the administration of IV AB’s? If no do you require further training? Overall how well do we identify and initiate treatment of deteriorating patients? Please circle appropriate answer A I think we do it very well B I think we do it well but could improve C I think we could improve Improved Staff confidence/ competencies to assess deteriorating patients Our aim here was to develop new structured documentation within the resus bay to support nursing staff to carry out an A-E assessment of deteriorating patient’s. This is currently being tested in the ED. Additionally we carried out a confidence score to identify staff learning needs. Improving journey and imaging process for out of hours patients University Hospital Ayr Emergency Department Triage NEWS SCORE Is it 4 or more? Refer to Nurse led Sepsis 6 Identifiers YES NO Does the pt have a score of 2 or more accompanied by +ve or presumed infection? YES NO Triage pt as orange contact nurse in charge or nurse co-ordinator Immediately begin sepsis 6 bundle STOP AND THINK! Continue normal triage process University Hospital Ayr Emergency Department Nurse Led Early Identification and Delivery of Sepsis Six Bundle If score is 2 or more and accompanied by positive or presumed infection then this patient has SEPSIS - triage as orange – inform the nurse co-ordinator. Implementation of Sepsis Six Bundle must be completed within one hour. Vital signs require to be measured every 15 minutes throughout this episode. Reassessment is required at 1 hour of initiation- are there signs of organ dysfunction, BP systolic < 90 after fluid challenge, urine output <0.5mls/kg, O2 needed to keep sats >90%? Is NEWs > 4? Could this be due to Infection and/or does patient look sick? Yes but source unclear at present Pneumonia UTI Abdo pain or distension Cellulitis/septic arthritis/infected wound Device-related Infection Meningitis Recent Chemo/immuno compromised Other (specify).................................... Identification Criteria Met Time...................... YES because at least 2 of the below: Systollic <90 Temp >38.3 Temp <36 Heart rate >90/min Resp rate >20/min Acutely altered mental state Blood Glucose > 6.6 in absence of diabetes NO as less than 2 of the above 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 3/7/17 10/7/17 17/7/17 24/7/17 31/7/17 7/8/17 14/8/17 21/8/17 Time in Minutes Date UHA ED Triage To X-Ray Time (Baseline) Median 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 12/1/17 12/8/17 12/15/17 12/22/17 12/29/17 1/5/18 1/12/18 1/19/18 1/26/18 2/2/18 2/9/18 2/16/18 2/23/18 Time in minutes Date UHA ED Triage to Xray Time Median Early signs of improvement have been noted since the introduction of staff competency framework/training. This is an on-going programme with many staff still to complete.

Transcript of Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making...

Page 1: Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making …nhsscotlandevent.whitespacers.com/sites/default/files/S...Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s

Scan me!

www.nhsaaa.net

to visit our website:

Find us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/nhsaaaFollow us on Twitter @NHSaaa

Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

BackgroundThe Scottish Government 20/20 vision (2011) set out its strategic vision for achieving sustainable quality in the delivery of healthcare services across Scotland. Within NHS Ayrshire and Arran, a new Emergency Department (ED)/Combined Assessment Unit (CAU) opened transforming the delivery of unscheduled care and enabling the appropriate patients to be seen in the appropriate department, thus improving delivery of emergency care. Within the ED this transitional period was a suitable time to develop and introduce a framework for ongoing continuous clinical improvement.

AimsWe aimed to establish and maintain a continuous quality improvement (QI) programme. Identified priorities for improvement were:

• Improved staff confidences /competencies to assess deteriorating patients• Improved care of deteriorating/septic patients• Improved imaging process for out-of-hours patients

MethodologyUsing improvement methodology we devised a driver diagram defining our improvement plan.

PDSA (plan, do, study, act) methodology was used to carry out small tests of change and identify further areas for improvement.

Improving journey and imaging process for out of hours patientsOur aim here was to facilitate and expedite the care and management of minor injury patients attending ED during out of hours period. It was our vision to increase patient satisfaction by reducing their overall waiting time with the department.

Initially the focus has been on supporting staff through a competency based framework to allow them to request x-rays out of hours. Additionally staff have been collecting baseline data to identify which aspects of the process could/should be improved.

A focus of the month poster was developed to raise staff awareness of the improvement project and introduce a framework for ongoing continuous clinical improvement.

Improved Staff confidence/competencies to assess deteriorating patientsWe collected baseline data which has identified the need for improvement:

Results/Outcomes

Improved Care of Septic PatientsThe LNA identified areas in which nursing staff felt they would need additionally training/ competencies to be able to successfully initiate a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle .

Unsurprisingly these were aspects of the bundle that are normally carried out by medics in the ED.

ConclusionThis is still very much ‘work in progress’ within the ED. Staff attitudes have changed with many embracing quality Improvement as part of our ‘daily business’. We plan to continue to support and develop a framework for Improvement which will be inclusive for all staff. By doing so we will be able to deliver the high quality healthcare that the people of Ayrshire and Arran expect and deserve.

It is our vision that the introduction of both our new structured documentation and our new ‘buddy’ system will increase the compliance with patients having a documented A-E assessment and improve staff confidence and competency in assessment of the deteriorating patient.

Improved Care of Septic PatientsOur aim here was to introduce a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle. Again we indentified staffs learning needs by carrying out a learning needs analysis (LNA).

Following this we devised a competency framework and process to allow nurses to carry out all aspects of the sepsis 6 bundle within the ED

MIS

18-0

58-D

M

Sharon Deans SCN, Sadie Wilson SCN, Rosemary Murray SCN, Stephanie FrearsonS-04

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

PDSA (plan, do, study, act) methodology was used to carry out small tests of change and identify further areas for improvement. Improved Staff confidence/competencies to assess deteriorating patients – our aim here was to develop new structured documentation within the resus bay to support nursing staff to carry out an A-E assessment of deteriorating patient’s. This is currently being tested in the ED. Additionally we carried out a confidence score to identify staff learning needs.

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

Sharon Deans, Sadie Wilson, Rosemary Murray - Senior Charge Nurses ED Stephanie Frearson Improvement Advisor Background The Scottish Government 20/20 vision (2011) set out its strategic vision for achieving sustainable quality in the delivery of healthcare services across Scotland. Within NHS Ayrshire and Arran, a new Emergency Department (ED)/Combined Assessment Unit (CAU) opened transforming the delivery of unscheduled care and enabling the appropriate patients to be seen in the appropriate department, thus improving delivery of emergency care. Within the ED this transitional period was a suitable time to develop and introduce a framework for ongoing continuous clinical improvement. Aim We aimed to establish and maintain a continuous quality improvement (QI) programme. Identified priorities for improvement were:

• Standardised A-E approach to nursing assessment; • Improved care of deteriorating/septic patients • Improved imaging process for out-of-hours patients

Methodology Using improvement methodology we devised a driver diagram defining our improvement plan

Aim / Outcome Primary Drivers

Secondary Drivers

Improved staff confidence/competencies to assess Deteriorating

patients

• Development of ED specific resus

documentation• Re-visit ED Care Rounding• Improved Family Communication

To establish/maintain

an ongoing continuous Quality

Improvement programme within UHA Emergency Department and

achieve 95% compliance by July

2018

• Identification of suitable staff• Implementation of

training/competencies• Development of imaging criteria

Improving patient journey and Imaging process for

out of hours patients

• Team development to effectively deliver care required in relation to deteriorating patients

• Reliable identification and treatment of deteriorating patients

• Reliable identification and treatment ofseptic patients

Improved Care of Septic Patients

Develop/test A-Eapproach document

Electronic Communication Board

Revised Care rounding documentation

Family Info leaflet

Test ‘Sepsis Nurse’ Role

Introduction of NEWs

Focus of the Month

Algorithm for process

Competency framework

Change Ideas for Testing

University Hospital Ayr Emergency Department

Improvement Plan 2017-2018

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

Evaluation of the ABCDE Approach

Ratings Scales:[

1= not at all

2= a little confidence, limited knowledge and skills in this area

3= reasonably confident/ I feel there are some gaps in my knowledge

4= confident

5= extremely confident

QUESTION 1 2 3 4 5 Airway Airway obstruction

Paradoxical chest and abdominal movements (‘see-saw’ respirations) and the use of the accessory muscles of

respiration.

Central cyanosis

Breath sounds at the mouth or nose

Breathing

General signs of respiratory distress: sweating, central cyanosis, use of theaccessory muscles of respiration, and abdominal breathing

Count the respiratory rate.

Assess the depth of each breath, rhythm and whether chest expansion is equal on both sides.

Chest deformity

Breath sounds e.g. Stridor or wheeze

Circulation

Look at the colour of the hands and digits: are they blue, pink, pale or mottled?

Assess the limb temperature by feeling the patient’s hands: are they cool or warm?

Measure the capillary refill

Assess the state of the veins

Count the patient’s pulse rate

Palpate peripheral and central pulses, assessing for presence, rate, quality, regularity and equality.

Measure the patient’s blood pressure.

Disability

Make a rapid initial assessment of the patient’s conscious level using the AVPU method

Review and treat the ABCs: exclude or treat hypoxia and hypotension.

Drug-induced causes of depressed consciousness.

Examine the pupils (size, equality and reaction to light).

Exposure Examine the patient properly, full exposure and minimise heat loss.

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

Improving journey and imaging process for out of hours patients – our aim here was to facilitate and expedite the care and management of minor injury patients attending ED during out of hours period. It was our vision to increase patient satisfaction by reducing their overall waiting time with the department. Initially the focus has been on supporting staff through a competency based framework to allow them to request x-rays out of hours. Additionally staff have been collecting baseline data to identify which aspects of the process could/should be improved. A focus of the month poster was developed to raise staff awareness of the improvement project

Results/Outcomes Improved Staff confidence/competencies to assess deteriorating patients We collected baseline data which has identified the need for improvement:

FEBRUARY FOCUS OF THE MONTH

SCIENCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2017/2018 NURSE REQUESTED IMAGES FOR MINOR INJURIES(OOH PERIOD ) AIMS To facilitate and expedite the care and management of minor injury patients attending Accident and Emergency during out of hours period. To increase patient satisfaction by reducing their overall waiting time with the department To provide registered nurses opportunity to develop professional practice by achieving competence in examing a pre-determined group of patients attending Accident & Emergency (requesting x-ray examination as indicated) To ensure service delivery with Accident and Emergency remains patient focused. BOUNDARIES OF PRACTICE Fingers & thumb Foot Forearm Lower leg Big toe Wrist Ankle Hand Heel Foreign body exclusion TRAINING PROGRAMME INCLUDED *Professional Accountability within the framework of professional practice *Decision making at triage *Principles of clinical examination *Ionising radiation guidelines *Theory and implication of ionising radiation *X-Ray protocols *X-Ray requesting *Supervision *Assessment process and competency

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

It is our vision that the introduction of both our new structured documentation and our new ‘buddy’ system will increase the compliance with patients having a documented A-E assessment and improve staff confidence and competency in assessment of the deteriorating patient. Improved Care of Septic Patients The LNA identified areas in which nursing staff felt they would need additionally training/ competencies to be able to successfully initiate a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle

Overall how well do we identify and initiate treatment of deteriorating patient

Well

Well but could improve

Could improve

No answer

Are you confident inserting a venflon?

YES

NO

Unsure

further training would be of benefit?

Are you confident taking bloods?

YES

NO

Unsure

further training would be of benefit?

Are you confident taking blood cultures?

YES

NO

Unsure

further training would be of benefit?

Unsurprisingly these were aspects of the bundle that are normally carried out by medics in the ED.

0102030405060708090

100

2/1/

18

2/2/

18

2/3/

18

2/7/

18

2/10

/18

2/12

/18

2/13

/18

2/15

/18

2/18

/18

2/23

/18

2/24

/18

2/25

/18

% o

f pat

ient

s

Date

UHA EDTotal % of patients with a Physiological Deterioration who have a documentented

A-E Nursing Assessment in Resus bay

Median

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

It is our vision that the introduction of both our new structured documentation and our new ‘buddy’ system will increase the compliance with patients having a documented A-E assessment and improve staff confidence and competency in assessment of the deteriorating patient. Improved Care of Septic Patients The LNA identified areas in which nursing staff felt they would need additionally training/ competencies to be able to successfully initiate a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle

Overall how well do we identify and initiate treatment of deteriorating patient

Well

Well but could improve

Could improve

No answer

Are you confident inserting a venflon?

YES

NO

Unsure

further training would be of benefit?

Are you confident taking bloods?

YES

NO

Unsure

further training would be of benefit?

Are you confident taking blood cultures?

YES

NO

Unsure

further training would be of benefit?

Unsurprisingly these were aspects of the bundle that are normally carried out by medics in the ED.

0102030405060708090

100

2/1/

18

2/2/

18

2/3/

18

2/7/

18

2/10

/18

2/12

/18

2/13

/18

2/15

/18

2/18

/18

2/23

/18

2/24

/18

2/25

/18

% o

f pat

ient

s

Date

UHA EDTotal % of patients with a Physiological Deterioration who have a documentented

A-E Nursing Assessment in Resus bay

Median

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

Improved Care of Septic Patients – Our aim here was to introduce a nurse led sepsis 6 bundle. Again we identified staffs learning needs by carrying out a learning needs analysis (LNA).

Following this we devised a competency framework and process to allow nurses to carry out all aspects of the sepsis 6 bundle within the ED

As part of our ongoing Improvement work within ED we plan to review/improve our care of

deteriorating and/or septic patients. To enable us to understand staff’s understanding and

learning needs please complete the following questionnaire. This should then be returned to

Sadie or Kimberley. Many thanks.

Caroline or Yvonne B.

Thank you for taking the time to complete.

Please answer yes or no to each question YES NO UNSURE COMMENTS

. 1. Are you confident with the triage process?

. If no do feel further training would be of benefit?

2. If a patient scores high on NEWs are you

confident with the escalation process?

If no do you require further training?

3. Have you completed a PGD for

administration of fluids?

4. Are you confident inserting a venflon?

If no do you require further training?

5. Are you confident taking bloods?

If no do you require further training?

6. Are you confident taking blood cultures?

If no do you require further training?

7. Are you confident taking ABG’s?

If no do you require further training?

8. Are you confident with the administration of

IV AB’s?

If no do you require further training?

Overall how well do we identify and initiate treatment of deteriorating patients?

Please circle appropriate answer

A I think we do it very well

B I think we do it well but could improve

C I think we could improve

Improved Staff confidence/competencies to assess deteriorating patientsOur aim here was to develop new structured documentation within the resus bay to support nursing staff to carry out an A-E assessment of deteriorating patient’s. This is currently being tested in the ED. Additionally we carried out a confidence score to identify staff learning needs.

Improving journey and imaging process for out of hours patients

Ayr Hospital Emergency Department Creating a culture of quality in the ED - making quality improvement everyone’s business

University Hospital Ayr

Emergency Department Triage

NEWS SCORE

Is it 4 or more?

Refer to Nurse led Sepsis 6 Identifiers

YES NO

Does the pt have a score of 2 or more accompanied

by +ve or presumed infection?

YES

NO

Triage pt as orange – contact nurse in charge or nurse co-ordinator

Immediately begin sepsis 6 bundle

STOP AND THINK!

Continue normal triage process

University Hospital Ayr Emergency Department Nurse Led Early Identification and Delivery of Sepsis Six Bundle

• If score is 2 or more and accompanied by positive or presumed infection then this patient has SEPSIS - triage as orange – inform the nurse co-ordinator.

• Implementation of Sepsis Six Bundle must be completed within one hour. • Vital signs require to be measured every 15 minutes throughout this episode. • Reassessment is required at 1 hour of initiation- are there signs of organ dysfunction, BP systolic < 90 after fluid

challenge, urine output <0.5mls/kg, O2 needed to keep sats >90%?

Is NEWs > 4? Could this be due to Infection and/or does

patient look sick?

Yes but source unclear at present

Pneumonia

UTI

Abdo pain or distension

Cellulitis/septic arthritis/infected wound

Device-related Infection

Meningitis

Recent Chemo/immuno compromised

Other (specify)....................................

Identification Criteria Met Time......................

YES because at least 2 of the below:

Systollic <90

Temp >38.3

Temp <36

Heart rate >90/min

Resp rate >20/min

Acutely altered mental state

Blood Glucose > 6.6 in absence of diabetes

NO as less than 2 of the above

Early signs of improvement have been noted since the introduction of staff competency framework/training. This is an on-going programme with many staff still to complete.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

3/7/

17

10/7

/17

17/7

/17

24/7

/17

31/7

/17

7/8/

17

14/8

/17

21/8

/17

Tim

e in

Min

utes

Date

UHA EDTriage To X-Ray Time

(Baseline)Median

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12/1

/17

12/8

/17

12/1

5/17

12/2

2/17

12/2

9/17

1/5/

18

1/12

/18

1/19

/18

1/26

/18

2/2/

18

2/9/

18

2/16

/18

2/23

/18

Tim

e in

min

utes

Date

UHA EDTriage to Xray Time Median

Early signs of improvement have been noted since the introduction of staff competency framework/training. This is an on-going programme with many staff still to complete.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

3/7/

17

10/7

/17

17/7

/17

24/7

/17

31/7

/17

7/8/

17

14/8

/17

21/8

/17

Tim

e in

Min

utes

Date

UHA EDTriage To X-Ray Time

(Baseline)Median

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

12/1

/17

12/8

/17

12/1

5/17

12/2

2/17

12/2

9/17

1/5/

18

1/12

/18

1/19

/18

1/26

/18

2/2/

18

2/9/

18

2/16

/18

2/23

/18

Tim

e in

min

utes

Date

UHA EDTriage to Xray Time Median

Early signs of improvement have been noted since the introduction of staff competency framework/training. This is an on-going programme with many staff still to complete.