Cracking Explained
Transcript of Cracking Explained
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
1/7
This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved
By Mohammed Amir Eleffendi, Li Yang, Pearl Agyakwa,
and Mark Johnson, Department of Electrical andElectronics Engineering, University of Nottingham, UK
egradation of the thermal
conduction path is one of
the most common failure
mechanisms of power
semiconductor packages. Typically,
solder fatigue happens due to the thermo-
mechanical stresses at the interfacing
contacts resulting from mismatched
coefcient of thermal expansionsbetween different materials (which
make up the heat ow path) and causes
cracking. Thermal transient measurement
using Mentor Graphics' T3Sterhardware
is a common characterization method
for heat conduction path in power
semiconductor packages.
The heat ow path in this type of test can
be represented by an equivalent electrical
Resistance-Capacitance Cauer-type
model. T3Ster uses thermal impedance via
structure functions as a non-destructive
evaluation technique to detect structuraldefects in the heat conduction path.
In this work, junction-to-case thermal
resistance Rthjc
and cracked area, from
structure functions, are compared to the
cracked and unattached area estimated by
Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM) for
a conventional 1.2 kV/200 A IGBT power
module that is actively power-cycled to
degrade the solder at the substrate-base
plate interface. SAM imaging was performed
at regular intervals for multiple stages
of the power cycling test to observe the
gradual degradation of the solder layer. The
Power Module under test (see Figure. 1)
was an off-the-shelf 3-phase IGBT module
consisting of three substrate tiles mounted
on a copper baseplate with two IGBT chips
and two freestanding diodes on each [1].
D
Quantication of Cracked Areas in the Thermal Path ofHigh-power Multi-chip Modules using MicReD PowerTester1500A
The IGBT module was mounted onto acold plate with a 25 m thick Kapton lm
used as an interfacing material between
the cold plate and the baseplate. The
purpose of this lm was to increase the
case-to-ambient thermal resistance in
order to achieve a temperature swing
at the substrate-case interface and so
accelerate the degradation of the substrate
mount-down solder layer compared to
other failure mechanisms. All IGBTs were
biased with a gate-emitter voltage VGE
= 15 V such that the cycling current IC
as well as the measurement current IM
were shared between the three legs of the
module. The collectoremitter voltage VCE
is a global measurement across the whole
module and therefore, it represents an
average measurement of the three legs. A
Figure 1.Layout of the Power Module under test (left) with the MicReD Industrial 1500A
Power Tester Unit (that contains a T3Ster) used in the Power Cycling Test (right)
Cracking Explained
calibration curve TJ =f(VCE) at a constantmeasurement current of IM = 200 mA was
used to calculate junction temperature TJ.
The cycling current IC was regulated by
the Power Tester to preserve a constant
TJ=120 K with T
Jmax= 140C and
TJmin = 20C as estimated from VCE with
the water temperature maintained at 20C.
The heating time and cooling time were
xed at 50 s, and 60 s respectively. This
achieved a T of 70 K at the substrate
with T max = 90C and T min = 20C. The
test started with an initial cycling current
IC = 236 A which resulted in a power
dissipation PD = 704 W. As the thermal
resistance increased during the test due
to solder fatigue, the cycling current was
regulated to keep theTJconstant. Under
these conditions, the wire-bond lift-off
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
2/7
This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved
Power Electronics
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
3/7
This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved
Figure 2.Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM) images at different cycles during the power cycling test.
Figure 3.Estimated attached area of solder layer during the cycling test from SAM images.
Figure 4.Cumulative T3Ster structure function showing different layers of the thermal stack as number of cycles increase
mechanism is not the dominant mechanism
and the substrate mount-down solder
degrades before any wire-bond lift-off is
observed. The power cycling was paused
regularly every 1000 cycles, at which time
a thermal impedance measurement was
made of the module in situ by the 1500A
Power Tester and this resulted in a total
of 17 thermal impedance measurements
during the test.
SAM characterization was carried out
during the power cycling test using a
PVA TePla AM300. Scanning acoustic
microscopy is a non-destructive technique
that allows us to image the internal
features of a specimen and can detect
discontinuities and voids of sub-micronthickness. It creates 2D greyscale images
from the reected ultrasonic echoes.
Defects at any of the internal layers cause
discontinuity in the structure and block
the ultrasonic signal preventing it from
penetrating through the layers beneath
the defected areas. Thus, defects in the
substrate solder result in a black shadow
appearing in the C scan images taken from
the chip level (Figure 2). In this way, the C
scan images were used to obtain distinct
boundaries between the attached and
discontinuous areas. However, the exact
location of the defects within the structurecan be unclear from SAM images, and
therefore, correlative metallurgical cross-
sectioning was necessary. The power
cycling test was terminated after 17,700
cycles by which time the total junction-
to-ambient thermal resistance Rthja had
increased by 14% from its original value.
After examination, all IGBT devices were
still electrically functional. Following the
nal SAM observation, metallurgical cross-
sections were prepared and examined
under an optical microscope in order to
conrm the degradation mode.
The IGBT module was imaged in its
original state, i.e. prior to power cycling.
No cracks or voids were observed in the
internal layers at that stage (Figure 2). The
power cycling test was interrupted for
SAM imaging at 9100, 10,450, 13,350,
and 15,500 cycles. At 17,700 cycles, the
test was terminated and a nal scan was
performed. The percentage of attached
area was calculated as Attached Area (%)
= Number of White Pixels/Total Number
of Pixels. Figure 3 shows the estimated
attached area of the solder layer at different
cycle numbers during the cycling test.
At zero cycles, the attached area was
estimated to be 93%. This is because
the processing algorithm recognizes
the separation lines between different
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
4/7
This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved
substrates and between copper traces
and the wire bond footprints as black
(cracked) pixels. However, this feature
does not affect the observed trends as it
is persistent in the remaining images. As
the number of cycles increases, cracking
propagates through the solder causing the
attached area to be reduced gradually until
it reaches 43% attached area after 17,700
cycles.
Figure 4 shows that a change develops
in the structure function as the number of
cycles increases. This change appears as
an increasing thermal resistance since the
curve is shifting to the right over the x-axis
with the increasing number of cycles. The
change starts at the interface between thebase-plate region and substrate where an
expansion over the x-axis can be spotted.
However, it is difcult to conclude from
this plot alone exactly where in the solder
interface region the cracking is happening.
The junction-to-case thermal resistance
Rthjc
can be measured from the structure
function at the end of the baseplate region
and before the start of the Kapton lm
region. Figure 5 shows Rthjc
as a function
of number of cycles. It can be seen that
Rthjc
stays unchanged until 8000 cycles,
and from this point onwards it increasesprogressively until the end of the test.
The total increment in Rthjc
is about 70%
from its original value which is estimated
as 0.024C/W. This increment is a result
of cracks in the solder at the substrate-
base-plate interface which is conrmed by
metallurgical cross-sectioning as shown in
gure 6.
Figure 5 also shows values of Rthjc
measured at 7000, 9000, 11,000, 15,000,
and 17,000 cycles plotted as a function
of the percentage of attached area as
estimated from the SAM images of gure2. It can be seen that as the attached
area decreases the thermal resistance
increases rapidly. It is also noted in gure 5
that the sensitivity of the structure function
for structural defects is dependent on the
location of the semiconductor chip relative
to the location of the defect. That is, it has
higher sensitivity for defects located directly
below the chip such that the defect has a
direct thermal effect on the chip, whereas
a defect located far from the chip would
result in lower sensitivity of the structure
function for that defect. That is the reason
why no change in the structure function is
seen until 35% of the substrate-case solder
layer is cracked through. Cracking of the
solder starts at the corners of the substrate
and initially this has little effect on the heat
owing from the semiconductor chips
towards the heatsink. With propagation
of the cracking towards the center of the
substrate, the heat ow is obstructed and
only then does the structure function start
to indicate the presence of a defect.
Figure 7 shows the T3Ster differential
structure function K(R) between 7000
cycles and 15,000 cycles. Each peak in
this plot indicates a new layer of material
with a different cross-sectional area.
A decrease in the amplitude of a peak
indicates a reduction in cross-sectional
area of the layer related to that peak. The
shift in the location of the peak along the
x-axis indicates a change in the thermal
resistance of this layer. Hence, the thermal
resistance of the individual layers can be
identied. In addition, the thickness can
be identied if the material properties are
known. The most signicant peak is Peak
3, which is related to the baseplate layer.
The other peaks are shown related to the
different materials heat is owing through.
The most signicant changes can be seen
in the amplitude of Peaks 2 & 3, which
are decreasing. Peak 1 and Peak 4, on
the other hand, remain at almost constant
amplitude. This decrease in the amplitude
signies a reduced cross-sectional area of
Figure 5.The change in the junction-to-case thermal resistance Rthjc during the power cycling test as
a result of solder fatigue and how it correlates to the cross sectional attached area of the layer.
Figure 6.Image of metallurgical cross-section showing the cracking
resulting from power cycling at the substrate-baseplate interface.
Figure 7.T3Ster differential structure function during the power cycle
test. Different peaks indicate different layers (as shown)
Power Electronics
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
5/7
This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved
the solder layer which is at the interface
between the DBC substrate and the
baseplate. This is accompanied by an
increase in the thermal resistance of the
solder layer which is indicated by a shift in
the location of Peak 2 and Peak 3 along
the positive x-axis.
The K-value of Peak 3 (that is, the Case)
from the T3Ster differential structure
function (Figure 7) can be plotted against
the number of cycles and this is shown in
gure 8. A decrease in the K-value is clear
as the number of power cycles increases,
and is indicative of reduced cross-sectional
area. In order to reveal the relationship
between the two quantities, the cross-
sectional area estimated earlier from theSAM images was compared to the K-value
given by a differential T3Ster structure
function. This is correlated in gure 9 where
the K-value can be seen to be linearly
related to the cross-sectional area squared.
This is in agreement with theoretical
relationships we have evaluated [1] and is
an important nding of this study.
If we now look at the individual IGBTs in
our module under test, all were functional
after 17,700 power cycling tests. At this
point in the test, the SAM image showed
different levels of discontinuity beneaththe individual IGBT devices. Therefore, an
investigation was carried out to examine
whether this non-uniformity in heat ow
can be observed in the structure functions
for the individual IGBT chips in addition
to the module as a whole. For this study,
thermal paste was used as the interface
material instead of the Kapton lm used
during the power cycling test. The local
thermal impedance of each individual
IGBT in the module was measured and
the structure function was calculated.
The attached area under each individual
IGBT is estimated from the SAM imageat 17,700 cycles and these are shown
in gure 10. The IGBT devices were
numbered from 1 to 6 and the area under
each IGBT was cropped to calculate
the attached area using a MatLab
methodology [1].
The estimated percentage attached area
under each device is shown in gure
11 with values from lowest to highest
being Device 4, followed by Device 2,
then Device 3, Device 5, Device 6, and
nally Device 1. Figure 11 also shows
the cumulative structure function for the
individual IGBTs. A large difference can
be seen between the curves as a result
of the different levels of discontinuity in
the substrate to baseplate interface area
Figure 8.K value of the case region shows a steady decline over
the power cycling test indicating a decreasing cross-sectional area.
Figure 9.K value given by the differential structure function at the baseplate region it has a
linear correlation to the square of the fractional cross-sectional area of the solder layer.
Figure 10.SAM image of the cycled module at 17,700 cycles shows
different levels of delamination under the 6 IGBT devices.
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
6/7
This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved
below each IGBT. The different thermal
layers can be most easily identied on the
curves related to Device 1 and Device 6
as they are the least affected by solder
fatigue. Features of the different layers
in the structure start to disappear as the
level of local delamination increases in
the other devices. Device 4 is the worst
affected by cracking and its different
layers' features cannot be distinguished.
Hence, we concluded that the junction-
to-ambient thermal resistance Rthja
may be
directly compared with the percentage of
attached area below the individual IGBTs.
Figure 12 shows Rthja
of the individual
IGBTs as a function of attached area of
the solder under each IGBT. Similar to theresult shown in gure 5, it can be seen
that the Rthja can be correlated to the
attached area. If we also produce and
plot K-value against the square of the
percentage of attached area, gure 13
shows yet again a clear linear correlation
can be deduced with K-value being a
function of the square of the fractional
attached area of each individual IGBT.
Conclusions
An evaluation using MicReD T3Ster
structure functions within a Mentor
Graphics 1500A Power Tester as a non-destructive testing tool for examining
the integrity of the heat ow path in
high power multi-chip semiconductor
modules under repeated cycling has
been carried out. A 1.2 kV/200 A IGBT
power module (with six IGBTs) was power
cycled to activate the solder fatigue
failure mechanism at the substrate
baseplate interface. Thermal impedance
measurements and SAM imaging were
performed at regular intervals during the
power cycling test. From this data, the
thermal structure function was calculated
and the cracked area in the solder layerwas estimated. Failure analysis by cross-
sectioning conrmed the location of the
discontinuity at the substratebaseplate
solder layer. A clear correlation was found
in this study between the change in the
junction-to-case thermal resistance Rthjc
estimated from the structure function and
the remaining attached area of the solder
layer calculated from SAM images. It was
shown that the K-value obtained from the
differential structure function was linearly
related to the square of the percentage
of attached area estimated from SAM
images. Similar results were found for the
structure function calculated from the local
measurement of the thermal impedances
of individual IGBT devices in the module.
Hence, the MicReD 1500A Power Tester
and its structure functions can be used
to estimate degradation in specic layers
of a power module and individual devices
non-destructively. Consequently, it can
be used as a primary inspection tool to
rapidly test the integrity of heat ow path
in power modules before deciding whether
further, but potentially time-consuming
alternatives like SAM, or destructive
analysis is required.
References
[1] M.A. Eleffendi, et al., Quantication
of cracked area in thermal path of high-
power multi-chip modules using transient
thermal impedance measurement,
Microelectronics Reliability (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2016.01.002
Figure 11.Percentage of attached area local to the IGBT devices and the cumulative
structure function of each individual IGBT device after 17,700 cycles.
Figure 12.The junction-to-ambient thermal resistance Rthja of the individual IGBTs
after 17,700 cycles as a function of the attached area below each IGBT.
Figure 13.K-value as a function of the square of the fractional attached area of the individual IGBTs.
Power Electronics
-
7/25/2019 Cracking Explained
7/7
This article originally appeared inEngineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1
Download the latest issue:
www.mentor.com/mechanical/products/engineering-edge
2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation,
all rights reserved. This document contains
information that is proprietary to Mentor
Graphics Corporation and may be duplicated
in whole or in part by the original recipient
for internal business purposes only, provided
that this entire notice appears in all copies. In
accepting this document, the recipient agrees
to make every reasonable effort to preventunauthorized use of this information.
All trademarks mentioned in this publication are
the trademarks of their respective owners.
Accelerate Innovation
with CFD & Thermal
Characterization
You might also be interested in...
Airbus Operations Ltd.: Aircraft Refuel Rig Pressure Surge Modeling
Early Stage Analysis of EV Power Electronics
Ask the GSS Expert: Simplifying Modeling Challenges
in Complex Networks
Analog Devices Inc.: Thermal Analysis of PCB Mounted Small Outline
Packages
How ToHow to characterize Heat Exchangers
Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH: The Liebherr LHM 550 Mobile Harbor
Crane
Rockwell Collins: In-Depth Lessons Learned: Review of an Avionics
Thermal Analysis Project
Lenovo: Electrolytic Capacitor Thermal Conductivity Study
Interview: Alberto Deponti, EnginSoft SpA
battenfeld-cincinnati: FloEFD to Model High-spec Extrusion Pipes
Chongqing Changan Motors: Analysis of the Optimized Designs for the
VVL Engine Lubrication System
Rohm Semiconductors: Dynamic Compact Thermal Model Development
Pan Asia Technical Automotive Center: HVAC Module Temperature
Linearity Design
EU Joint Research Center ISPRA: European Nuclear Safeguards
Robert Bosch Automotive Steering GmbH: Flow Conditions Optimization
Mercury Racing: Innovation as Standard
Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences: Hole Implantable
Collamer Lens
Geek Hub: Whats the Fastest Way to Dry your Hands?