Cracking Explained

download Cracking Explained

of 7

Transcript of Cracking Explained

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    1/7

    This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved

    By Mohammed Amir Eleffendi, Li Yang, Pearl Agyakwa,

    and Mark Johnson, Department of Electrical andElectronics Engineering, University of Nottingham, UK

    egradation of the thermal

    conduction path is one of

    the most common failure

    mechanisms of power

    semiconductor packages. Typically,

    solder fatigue happens due to the thermo-

    mechanical stresses at the interfacing

    contacts resulting from mismatched

    coefcient of thermal expansionsbetween different materials (which

    make up the heat ow path) and causes

    cracking. Thermal transient measurement

    using Mentor Graphics' T3Sterhardware

    is a common characterization method

    for heat conduction path in power

    semiconductor packages.

    The heat ow path in this type of test can

    be represented by an equivalent electrical

    Resistance-Capacitance Cauer-type

    model. T3Ster uses thermal impedance via

    structure functions as a non-destructive

    evaluation technique to detect structuraldefects in the heat conduction path.

    In this work, junction-to-case thermal

    resistance Rthjc

    and cracked area, from

    structure functions, are compared to the

    cracked and unattached area estimated by

    Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM) for

    a conventional 1.2 kV/200 A IGBT power

    module that is actively power-cycled to

    degrade the solder at the substrate-base

    plate interface. SAM imaging was performed

    at regular intervals for multiple stages

    of the power cycling test to observe the

    gradual degradation of the solder layer. The

    Power Module under test (see Figure. 1)

    was an off-the-shelf 3-phase IGBT module

    consisting of three substrate tiles mounted

    on a copper baseplate with two IGBT chips

    and two freestanding diodes on each [1].

    D

    Quantication of Cracked Areas in the Thermal Path ofHigh-power Multi-chip Modules using MicReD PowerTester1500A

    The IGBT module was mounted onto acold plate with a 25 m thick Kapton lm

    used as an interfacing material between

    the cold plate and the baseplate. The

    purpose of this lm was to increase the

    case-to-ambient thermal resistance in

    order to achieve a temperature swing

    at the substrate-case interface and so

    accelerate the degradation of the substrate

    mount-down solder layer compared to

    other failure mechanisms. All IGBTs were

    biased with a gate-emitter voltage VGE

    = 15 V such that the cycling current IC

    as well as the measurement current IM

    were shared between the three legs of the

    module. The collectoremitter voltage VCE

    is a global measurement across the whole

    module and therefore, it represents an

    average measurement of the three legs. A

    Figure 1.Layout of the Power Module under test (left) with the MicReD Industrial 1500A

    Power Tester Unit (that contains a T3Ster) used in the Power Cycling Test (right)

    Cracking Explained

    calibration curve TJ =f(VCE) at a constantmeasurement current of IM = 200 mA was

    used to calculate junction temperature TJ.

    The cycling current IC was regulated by

    the Power Tester to preserve a constant

    TJ=120 K with T

    Jmax= 140C and

    TJmin = 20C as estimated from VCE with

    the water temperature maintained at 20C.

    The heating time and cooling time were

    xed at 50 s, and 60 s respectively. This

    achieved a T of 70 K at the substrate

    with T max = 90C and T min = 20C. The

    test started with an initial cycling current

    IC = 236 A which resulted in a power

    dissipation PD = 704 W. As the thermal

    resistance increased during the test due

    to solder fatigue, the cycling current was

    regulated to keep theTJconstant. Under

    these conditions, the wire-bond lift-off

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    2/7

    This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved

    Power Electronics

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    3/7

    This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved

    Figure 2.Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM) images at different cycles during the power cycling test.

    Figure 3.Estimated attached area of solder layer during the cycling test from SAM images.

    Figure 4.Cumulative T3Ster structure function showing different layers of the thermal stack as number of cycles increase

    mechanism is not the dominant mechanism

    and the substrate mount-down solder

    degrades before any wire-bond lift-off is

    observed. The power cycling was paused

    regularly every 1000 cycles, at which time

    a thermal impedance measurement was

    made of the module in situ by the 1500A

    Power Tester and this resulted in a total

    of 17 thermal impedance measurements

    during the test.

    SAM characterization was carried out

    during the power cycling test using a

    PVA TePla AM300. Scanning acoustic

    microscopy is a non-destructive technique

    that allows us to image the internal

    features of a specimen and can detect

    discontinuities and voids of sub-micronthickness. It creates 2D greyscale images

    from the reected ultrasonic echoes.

    Defects at any of the internal layers cause

    discontinuity in the structure and block

    the ultrasonic signal preventing it from

    penetrating through the layers beneath

    the defected areas. Thus, defects in the

    substrate solder result in a black shadow

    appearing in the C scan images taken from

    the chip level (Figure 2). In this way, the C

    scan images were used to obtain distinct

    boundaries between the attached and

    discontinuous areas. However, the exact

    location of the defects within the structurecan be unclear from SAM images, and

    therefore, correlative metallurgical cross-

    sectioning was necessary. The power

    cycling test was terminated after 17,700

    cycles by which time the total junction-

    to-ambient thermal resistance Rthja had

    increased by 14% from its original value.

    After examination, all IGBT devices were

    still electrically functional. Following the

    nal SAM observation, metallurgical cross-

    sections were prepared and examined

    under an optical microscope in order to

    conrm the degradation mode.

    The IGBT module was imaged in its

    original state, i.e. prior to power cycling.

    No cracks or voids were observed in the

    internal layers at that stage (Figure 2). The

    power cycling test was interrupted for

    SAM imaging at 9100, 10,450, 13,350,

    and 15,500 cycles. At 17,700 cycles, the

    test was terminated and a nal scan was

    performed. The percentage of attached

    area was calculated as Attached Area (%)

    = Number of White Pixels/Total Number

    of Pixels. Figure 3 shows the estimated

    attached area of the solder layer at different

    cycle numbers during the cycling test.

    At zero cycles, the attached area was

    estimated to be 93%. This is because

    the processing algorithm recognizes

    the separation lines between different

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    4/7

    This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved

    substrates and between copper traces

    and the wire bond footprints as black

    (cracked) pixels. However, this feature

    does not affect the observed trends as it

    is persistent in the remaining images. As

    the number of cycles increases, cracking

    propagates through the solder causing the

    attached area to be reduced gradually until

    it reaches 43% attached area after 17,700

    cycles.

    Figure 4 shows that a change develops

    in the structure function as the number of

    cycles increases. This change appears as

    an increasing thermal resistance since the

    curve is shifting to the right over the x-axis

    with the increasing number of cycles. The

    change starts at the interface between thebase-plate region and substrate where an

    expansion over the x-axis can be spotted.

    However, it is difcult to conclude from

    this plot alone exactly where in the solder

    interface region the cracking is happening.

    The junction-to-case thermal resistance

    Rthjc

    can be measured from the structure

    function at the end of the baseplate region

    and before the start of the Kapton lm

    region. Figure 5 shows Rthjc

    as a function

    of number of cycles. It can be seen that

    Rthjc

    stays unchanged until 8000 cycles,

    and from this point onwards it increasesprogressively until the end of the test.

    The total increment in Rthjc

    is about 70%

    from its original value which is estimated

    as 0.024C/W. This increment is a result

    of cracks in the solder at the substrate-

    base-plate interface which is conrmed by

    metallurgical cross-sectioning as shown in

    gure 6.

    Figure 5 also shows values of Rthjc

    measured at 7000, 9000, 11,000, 15,000,

    and 17,000 cycles plotted as a function

    of the percentage of attached area as

    estimated from the SAM images of gure2. It can be seen that as the attached

    area decreases the thermal resistance

    increases rapidly. It is also noted in gure 5

    that the sensitivity of the structure function

    for structural defects is dependent on the

    location of the semiconductor chip relative

    to the location of the defect. That is, it has

    higher sensitivity for defects located directly

    below the chip such that the defect has a

    direct thermal effect on the chip, whereas

    a defect located far from the chip would

    result in lower sensitivity of the structure

    function for that defect. That is the reason

    why no change in the structure function is

    seen until 35% of the substrate-case solder

    layer is cracked through. Cracking of the

    solder starts at the corners of the substrate

    and initially this has little effect on the heat

    owing from the semiconductor chips

    towards the heatsink. With propagation

    of the cracking towards the center of the

    substrate, the heat ow is obstructed and

    only then does the structure function start

    to indicate the presence of a defect.

    Figure 7 shows the T3Ster differential

    structure function K(R) between 7000

    cycles and 15,000 cycles. Each peak in

    this plot indicates a new layer of material

    with a different cross-sectional area.

    A decrease in the amplitude of a peak

    indicates a reduction in cross-sectional

    area of the layer related to that peak. The

    shift in the location of the peak along the

    x-axis indicates a change in the thermal

    resistance of this layer. Hence, the thermal

    resistance of the individual layers can be

    identied. In addition, the thickness can

    be identied if the material properties are

    known. The most signicant peak is Peak

    3, which is related to the baseplate layer.

    The other peaks are shown related to the

    different materials heat is owing through.

    The most signicant changes can be seen

    in the amplitude of Peaks 2 & 3, which

    are decreasing. Peak 1 and Peak 4, on

    the other hand, remain at almost constant

    amplitude. This decrease in the amplitude

    signies a reduced cross-sectional area of

    Figure 5.The change in the junction-to-case thermal resistance Rthjc during the power cycling test as

    a result of solder fatigue and how it correlates to the cross sectional attached area of the layer.

    Figure 6.Image of metallurgical cross-section showing the cracking

    resulting from power cycling at the substrate-baseplate interface.

    Figure 7.T3Ster differential structure function during the power cycle

    test. Different peaks indicate different layers (as shown)

    Power Electronics

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    5/7

    This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved

    the solder layer which is at the interface

    between the DBC substrate and the

    baseplate. This is accompanied by an

    increase in the thermal resistance of the

    solder layer which is indicated by a shift in

    the location of Peak 2 and Peak 3 along

    the positive x-axis.

    The K-value of Peak 3 (that is, the Case)

    from the T3Ster differential structure

    function (Figure 7) can be plotted against

    the number of cycles and this is shown in

    gure 8. A decrease in the K-value is clear

    as the number of power cycles increases,

    and is indicative of reduced cross-sectional

    area. In order to reveal the relationship

    between the two quantities, the cross-

    sectional area estimated earlier from theSAM images was compared to the K-value

    given by a differential T3Ster structure

    function. This is correlated in gure 9 where

    the K-value can be seen to be linearly

    related to the cross-sectional area squared.

    This is in agreement with theoretical

    relationships we have evaluated [1] and is

    an important nding of this study.

    If we now look at the individual IGBTs in

    our module under test, all were functional

    after 17,700 power cycling tests. At this

    point in the test, the SAM image showed

    different levels of discontinuity beneaththe individual IGBT devices. Therefore, an

    investigation was carried out to examine

    whether this non-uniformity in heat ow

    can be observed in the structure functions

    for the individual IGBT chips in addition

    to the module as a whole. For this study,

    thermal paste was used as the interface

    material instead of the Kapton lm used

    during the power cycling test. The local

    thermal impedance of each individual

    IGBT in the module was measured and

    the structure function was calculated.

    The attached area under each individual

    IGBT is estimated from the SAM imageat 17,700 cycles and these are shown

    in gure 10. The IGBT devices were

    numbered from 1 to 6 and the area under

    each IGBT was cropped to calculate

    the attached area using a MatLab

    methodology [1].

    The estimated percentage attached area

    under each device is shown in gure

    11 with values from lowest to highest

    being Device 4, followed by Device 2,

    then Device 3, Device 5, Device 6, and

    nally Device 1. Figure 11 also shows

    the cumulative structure function for the

    individual IGBTs. A large difference can

    be seen between the curves as a result

    of the different levels of discontinuity in

    the substrate to baseplate interface area

    Figure 8.K value of the case region shows a steady decline over

    the power cycling test indicating a decreasing cross-sectional area.

    Figure 9.K value given by the differential structure function at the baseplate region it has a

    linear correlation to the square of the fractional cross-sectional area of the solder layer.

    Figure 10.SAM image of the cycled module at 17,700 cycles shows

    different levels of delamination under the 6 IGBT devices.

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    6/7

    This article was originally published in Engineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation all rights reserved

    below each IGBT. The different thermal

    layers can be most easily identied on the

    curves related to Device 1 and Device 6

    as they are the least affected by solder

    fatigue. Features of the different layers

    in the structure start to disappear as the

    level of local delamination increases in

    the other devices. Device 4 is the worst

    affected by cracking and its different

    layers' features cannot be distinguished.

    Hence, we concluded that the junction-

    to-ambient thermal resistance Rthja

    may be

    directly compared with the percentage of

    attached area below the individual IGBTs.

    Figure 12 shows Rthja

    of the individual

    IGBTs as a function of attached area of

    the solder under each IGBT. Similar to theresult shown in gure 5, it can be seen

    that the Rthja can be correlated to the

    attached area. If we also produce and

    plot K-value against the square of the

    percentage of attached area, gure 13

    shows yet again a clear linear correlation

    can be deduced with K-value being a

    function of the square of the fractional

    attached area of each individual IGBT.

    Conclusions

    An evaluation using MicReD T3Ster

    structure functions within a Mentor

    Graphics 1500A Power Tester as a non-destructive testing tool for examining

    the integrity of the heat ow path in

    high power multi-chip semiconductor

    modules under repeated cycling has

    been carried out. A 1.2 kV/200 A IGBT

    power module (with six IGBTs) was power

    cycled to activate the solder fatigue

    failure mechanism at the substrate

    baseplate interface. Thermal impedance

    measurements and SAM imaging were

    performed at regular intervals during the

    power cycling test. From this data, the

    thermal structure function was calculated

    and the cracked area in the solder layerwas estimated. Failure analysis by cross-

    sectioning conrmed the location of the

    discontinuity at the substratebaseplate

    solder layer. A clear correlation was found

    in this study between the change in the

    junction-to-case thermal resistance Rthjc

    estimated from the structure function and

    the remaining attached area of the solder

    layer calculated from SAM images. It was

    shown that the K-value obtained from the

    differential structure function was linearly

    related to the square of the percentage

    of attached area estimated from SAM

    images. Similar results were found for the

    structure function calculated from the local

    measurement of the thermal impedances

    of individual IGBT devices in the module.

    Hence, the MicReD 1500A Power Tester

    and its structure functions can be used

    to estimate degradation in specic layers

    of a power module and individual devices

    non-destructively. Consequently, it can

    be used as a primary inspection tool to

    rapidly test the integrity of heat ow path

    in power modules before deciding whether

    further, but potentially time-consuming

    alternatives like SAM, or destructive

    analysis is required.

    References

    [1] M.A. Eleffendi, et al., Quantication

    of cracked area in thermal path of high-

    power multi-chip modules using transient

    thermal impedance measurement,

    Microelectronics Reliability (2015), http://

    dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2016.01.002

    Figure 11.Percentage of attached area local to the IGBT devices and the cumulative

    structure function of each individual IGBT device after 17,700 cycles.

    Figure 12.The junction-to-ambient thermal resistance Rthja of the individual IGBTs

    after 17,700 cycles as a function of the attached area below each IGBT.

    Figure 13.K-value as a function of the square of the fractional attached area of the individual IGBTs.

    Power Electronics

  • 7/25/2019 Cracking Explained

    7/7

    This article originally appeared inEngineering Edge Vol. 5 Iss. 1

    Download the latest issue:

    www.mentor.com/mechanical/products/engineering-edge

    2016 Mentor Graphics Corporation,

    all rights reserved. This document contains

    information that is proprietary to Mentor

    Graphics Corporation and may be duplicated

    in whole or in part by the original recipient

    for internal business purposes only, provided

    that this entire notice appears in all copies. In

    accepting this document, the recipient agrees

    to make every reasonable effort to preventunauthorized use of this information.

    All trademarks mentioned in this publication are

    the trademarks of their respective owners.

    Accelerate Innovation

    with CFD & Thermal

    Characterization

    You might also be interested in...

    Airbus Operations Ltd.: Aircraft Refuel Rig Pressure Surge Modeling

    Early Stage Analysis of EV Power Electronics

    Ask the GSS Expert: Simplifying Modeling Challenges

    in Complex Networks

    Analog Devices Inc.: Thermal Analysis of PCB Mounted Small Outline

    Packages

    How ToHow to characterize Heat Exchangers

    Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH: The Liebherr LHM 550 Mobile Harbor

    Crane

    Rockwell Collins: In-Depth Lessons Learned: Review of an Avionics

    Thermal Analysis Project

    Lenovo: Electrolytic Capacitor Thermal Conductivity Study

    Interview: Alberto Deponti, EnginSoft SpA

    battenfeld-cincinnati: FloEFD to Model High-spec Extrusion Pipes

    Chongqing Changan Motors: Analysis of the Optimized Designs for the

    VVL Engine Lubrication System

    Rohm Semiconductors: Dynamic Compact Thermal Model Development

    Pan Asia Technical Automotive Center: HVAC Module Temperature

    Linearity Design

    EU Joint Research Center ISPRA: European Nuclear Safeguards

    Robert Bosch Automotive Steering GmbH: Flow Conditions Optimization

    Mercury Racing: Innovation as Standard

    Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences: Hole Implantable

    Collamer Lens

    Geek Hub: Whats the Fastest Way to Dry your Hands?